Test: Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Base Model — Ingen RTX? Inga problem! (Sammanfattning)
Snabbare än någon annan Blade 15 GTX-laptop. GTX 1660 Ti är bara marginellt långsammare än RTX 2060 när det kommer till rena GPU-hästkrafter samtidigt som den kostar tusentals kronor mindre och lyckas prestera bättre än den snabbaste Pascal-baserade konfigurationen av Blade 15. Några dolda brister som lite sämre färgprecision och lägre CPU-prestanda förtar bara helhetsupplevelsen en aning.
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
Alienware m15 R2 P87F |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 312.7 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1158:1 (Svärta: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.57 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 2.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
91.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080 | Alienware m15 R2 P87F Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Samsung 156WR04, SDCA029, OLED, 15.6, 3840x2160 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 15.6, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 3936% | -20% | 3932% | 30% | 3889% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 13.6 (7.2, 6.4) | 12.8 (6.8, 6) 6% | 16.8 (9.2, 7.6) -24% | 16.4 (7.6, 6.8) -21% | 2.3 (1.1, 1.2) 83% | 15.2 (7.6, 7.6) -12% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10 (6, 4) | 10.4 (6, 4.4) -4% | 11.6 (7.2, 4.4) -16% | 8.8 (4.4, 4.4) 12% | 2.4 (1.1, 1.3) 76% | 11.2 (6.8, 4.4) -12% |
PWM Frequency | 200 (99) | 23810 (10) 11805% | 23810 (24) 11805% | 59.52 (100) -70% | 23580 (24) 11690% | |
Screen | 17% | 7% | -17% | 6% | 6% | |
Brightness middle | 312.7 | 293 -6% | 314.7 1% | 324.2 4% | 421.2 35% | 266 -15% |
Brightness | 305 | 270 -11% | 312 2% | 304 0% | 417 37% | 248 -19% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 87 -3% | 90 0% | 90 0% | 94 4% | 89 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.29 -7% | 0.38 -41% | 0.38 -41% | 0.31 -15% | |
Contrast | 1158 | 1010 -13% | 828 -28% | 853 -26% | 858 -26% | |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 4.57 | 1.69 63% | 2.56 44% | 5.01 -10% | 6.06 -33% | 2.78 39% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 6.81 | 3.37 51% | 4.89 28% | 12.7 -86% | 11.89 -75% | 5.96 12% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 2.91 | 1.24 57% | 1.71 41% | 1.64 44% | 0.91 69% | |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 4.3 | 2.3 47% | 3.4 21% | 7.9 -84% | 2.8 35% | 3.58 17% |
Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.3 96% | 2.3 96% | 2.35 94% | 2.15 102% | 2.46 89% |
CCT | 7098 92% | 6758 96% | 6435 101% | 8455 77% | 6235 104% | 7186 90% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.4 | 63 6% | 60.7 2% | 60.8 2% | 81 36% | 62 4% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91.3 | 98.5 8% | 94.6 4% | 95.5 5% | 99.6 9% | 96 5% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1977% /
857% | -7% /
3% | 1958% /
829% | 18% /
12% | 1948% /
838% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
13.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.2 ms rise | |
↘ 6.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.4 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 200 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9338 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (170 - 194, n=64) | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL | |
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
Schenker Key 16 | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
Asus ROG GA502DU | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (964 - 1306, n=66) | |
Schenker Key 16 | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL | |
Asus ROG GA502DU | |
Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (1.96 - 2.19, n=7) | |
Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
Asus ROG GA502DU | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (11.3 - 14.1, n=7) | |
Asus ROG GA502DU | |
Asus FX503VM-EH73 |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (6659 - 7214, n=10) | |
Schenker Key 16 | |
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
Asus ROG GA502DU | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (28251 - 36304, n=10) | |
Schenker Key 16 | |
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
Asus ROG GA502DU |
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m | |
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL | |
Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
Asus ROG GA502DU | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 |
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - --- | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (0.3 - 11365, n=38) | |
Asus ROG GA502DU | |
Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US | |
Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) (5041 - 5913, n=12) | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) (4074 - 5217, n=11) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4074 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5480 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Alienware m15 R2 P87F 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 23% | 13% | 28% | 6% | -17% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1149.77 | 976.6 -15% | 1426.35 24% | 1823.85 59% | 1140.57 -1% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 513.29 | 496.53 -3% | 576.02 12% | 983.98 92% | 454.24 -12% | |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1539.06 | 2082.66 35% | 2073.16 35% | 3182.39 107% | 2085.95 36% | |
Score Total | 3177 | 4221 33% | 3633 14% | 3638 15% | 2870 -10% | 2039 -36% |
Score Write | 1450 | 2102 45% | 1481 2% | 1693 17% | 1141 -21% | 802 -45% |
Score Read | 1152 | 1394 21% | 1407 22% | 1294 12% | 1186 3% | 815 -29% |
Access Time Write * | 0.104 | 0.034 67% | 0.108 -4% | 0.039 62% | 0.065 37% | 0.045 57% |
Access Time Read * | 0.063 | 0.05 21% | 0.065 -3% | 0.05 21% | 0.042 33% | 0.071 -13% |
4K-64 Write | 1212.2 | 1807.21 49% | 1135.27 -6% | 1456.13 20% | 921.88 -24% | 570.49 -53% |
4K-64 Read | 917.46 | 1159.06 26% | 1177.33 28% | 1077.98 17% | 875.61 -5% | 610.88 -33% |
4K Write | 105.96 | 108.34 2% | 108.86 3% | 98.3 -7% | 126.51 19% | 83.83 -21% |
4K Read | 51.32 | 52.08 1% | 37.2 -28% | 43.25 -16% | 59.11 15% | 43.09 -16% |
Seq Write | 1315.15 | 1864.07 42% | 2371.22 80% | 1386.27 5% | 923.81 -30% | 1474.76 12% |
Seq Read | 1828.99 | 1832.18 0% | 1924.95 5% | 1723.09 -6% | 2516.94 38% | 1612.2 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) (9500 - 12916, n=17) | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Razer Blade Pro 2017 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB | |
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) (18610 - 20940, n=18) | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator | |
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T |
3DMark 11 Performance | 16594 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 31563 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 12926 poäng | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 5406 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB | |
Asus G752VS | |
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) (62 - 73, n=6) | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB | |
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) (51.6 - 61.3, n=15) | |
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
Asus TUF FX705GM | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng |