Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Asus TUF FX705GM (i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Bra balanserad. Trots många besparingar är Asus TUF FX705 en intressant spellaptop som har en bra balans mellan pris och prestanda. I den här recensionen får du reda på var denna modell på 17 tum briljerar och vilka svagheter som behöver beaktas.
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook
Asus TUF FX705GM (TUF FX705 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1405 MHz, Minne: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 398.35, Optimus
Minne
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-kanal, alla platser upptagna
Skärm
17.30 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel HM370
Hårddisk
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, 256 GB 
, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW, 256 GB NVMe-SSD + Seagate BarraCuda Pro ST1000LM049, 1 TB HDD, 7200 rpm. Platser: 1x M.2 typ 2280 & 1x 2.5 tum
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC235 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning
Nätverk
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 27 x 400 x 279
Batteri
64 Wh, 4240 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2.0, Tangentbord: Chiclet RGB, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, nätadapter på 180 watt, McAfee LiveSafe Testversion, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.753 kg, Strömförsörjning: 439 g
Pris
1499 Kr
Länkar
Asus hemsida
Asus kategori
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

❌
432 mm 290 mm 29 mm 2.9 kg419 mm 289 mm 27 mm 2.9 kg414 mm 279.4 mm 23.9 mm 2.9 kg412 mm 285 mm 19.6 mm 2.4 kg400 mm 279 mm 27 mm 2.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Vänster sida: DC in, RJ45-LAN, HDMI 2.0, USB typ A 2.0, 2x USB typ A 3.0, ljud
Vänster sida: DC in, RJ45-LAN, HDMI 2.0, USB typ A 2.0, 2x USB typ A 3.0, ljud
Höger sida: Kensington-lås
Höger sida: Kensington-lås
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)
1139 MBit/s +65%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
692 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
670 MBit/s -3%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
640 MBit/s -8%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
448 MBit/s -35%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
317 MBit/s -54%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)
1379 MBit/s +102%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
693 MBit/s +2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
692 MBit/s +2%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
681 MBit/s
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
657 MBit/s -4%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
468 MBit/s -31%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Asus TUF FX705GM
Asus TUF FX705GM
Asus TUF FX705GM
Asus TUF FX705GM
Asus TUF FX705GM
236
cd/m²		246
cd/m²		236
cd/m²
225
cd/m²		234
cd/m²		228
cd/m²
208
cd/m²		225
cd/m²		215
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 246 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 228.1 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 205 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1170:1 (Svärta: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.02
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
Asus TUF FX705GM
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080		Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Chi Mei CMN1747 M173JJE-G32, TN LED, 1920x1080		MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 1920x1080		SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080
Display
30%
31%
-1%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
62.4
90
44%
90.8
46%
66.1
6%
67.1
8%
sRGB Coverage
88.8
100
13%
99.9
13%
84.4
-5%
86.1
-3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
63.8
84.8
33%
85.8
34%
61.7
-3%
63
-1%
Response Times
4%
17%
-281%
-253%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6)
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
-19%
7.8 ?(4.4, 3.4)
-5%
39.2 ?(20.4, 18.8)
-430%
36 ?(18.8, 17.2)
-386%
Response Time Black / White *
10 ?(4.8, 5.2)
7.4 ?(5.2, 2.2)
26%
6.2 ?(4.4, 1.8)
38%
23.2 ?(10.8, 12.4)
-132%
22 ?(10.4, 11.6)
-120%
PWM Frequency
25510 ?(15)
25510 ?(14)
119000 ?(90)
122000 ?(95)
Screen
-33%
-15%
-61%
-68%
Brightness middle
234
297.8
27%
262
12%
362
55%
365
56%
Brightness
228
285
25%
261
14%
350
54%
341
50%
Brightness Distribution
85
84
-1%
94
11%
91
7%
89
5%
Black Level *
0.2
0.33
-65%
0.2
-0%
0.29
-45%
0.32
-60%
Contrast
1170
902
-23%
1310
12%
1248
7%
1141
-2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.16
3.68
-70%
3.96
-83%
6.06
-181%
6.51
-201%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.39
7.71
-127%
7.29
-115%
11.6
-242%
12.32
-263%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.02
2.71
-34%
2.18
-8%
3.13
-55%
2.9
-44%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2
5
-150%
3.09
-55%
7.22
-261%
7.65
-283%
Gamma
2.46 89%
2.06 107%
2.48 89%
2.51 88%
2.64 83%
CCT
6394 102%
6728 97%
6977 93%
7659 85%
8066 81%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58
84.77
46%
76
31%
55
-5%
56
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
89
99.97
12%
100
12%
84
-6%
86
-3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
0% / -16%
11% / -3%
-114% / -77%
-107% / -78%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.8 ms rise
↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
Mjukvara
LatencyMon
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=231, last 2 years)
268 Points +53%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points 0%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
173 Points -1%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Intel Core i7-8750H
168 Points -4%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=232, last 2 years)
3090 Points +172%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H
1137 Points
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Intel Core i7-8750H
1132 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
1112 Points -2%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Intel Core i7-8750H
1027 Points -10%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
807 Points -29%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (2.62 - 3.73, n=23, last 2 years)
3.21 Points +61%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H
2 Points
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.99 Points 0%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.96 Points -2%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.92 Points -4%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 64.3, n=24, last 2 years)
35.6 Points +178%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.79 Points
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.33 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.2 Points -5%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.2 Points -12%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
8.79 Points -31%
06012018024030036042048054060066072078084090096010201080Tooltip
Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1022 (992.14-1137)
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø995 (976.78-1132)
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø981 (966-1112.47)
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø935 (926.78-1026.8)
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
12.79 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
175 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1137 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=199, last 2 years)
7588 Points +47%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5525 Points +7%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
5169 Points
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB
4734 Points -8%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5371 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (4166 - 6653, n=34, last 2 years)
5222 Points +12%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4660 Points
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4393 Points -6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND
4253 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB
4196 Points -10%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4622 - 7085, n=32, last 2 years)
6048 Points +6%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
5719 Points
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5528 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB
5389 Points -6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND
5347 Points -7%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5323 Points -7%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4660 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5719 poäng
PCMark 10 Score
5169 poäng
Hjälp
Asus TUF FX705GM
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G		Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP		MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP		SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Hynix HFS128G39TND
AS SSD
8%
12%
34%
-61%
Seq Read
1571
1993
27%
1749
11%
2589
65%
513
-67%
Seq Write
1236
1031
-17%
1173
-5%
1449
17%
128.2
-90%
4K Read
38.49
35.76
-7%
42.81
11%
52.8
37%
26.5
-31%
4K Write
101.9
88.4
-13%
98.4
-3%
112.3
10%
62.7
-38%
Score Read
913
1520
66%
1456
59%
1153
26%
414
-55%
Score Write
1082
825
-24%
906
-16%
1592
47%
196
-82%
Score Total
2458
3075
25%
3083
25%
3291
34%
811
-67%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1704 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1301 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 321.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 282.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1325 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1295 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.46 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 104.2 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=231, last 2 years)
40470 Points +195%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18349 Points +34%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14528 Points +6%
Asus TUF FX705GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
13722 Points
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9332 Points -32%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9147 Points -33%
3DMark 11 Performance
13450 poäng
Hjälp
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Asus TUF FX705GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G: Ø37.1 (34-39)
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP: Ø50.2 (46-54)
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND: Ø24.7 (23-26)
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 449, n=166, last 2 years)
220 fps +232%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
91.6 fps +38%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
66.2 fps
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
58.8 fps -11%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H
46.7 fps -29%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
44.6 fps -33%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=226, last 2 years)
117.1 fps +221%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
49.6 fps +36%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
41 fps +12%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
36.5 fps
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H
26 fps -29%
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
24.7 fps -32%
låg med. hög ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 66.2 36.5
The Crew 2 (2018) 60 60
Monster Hunter World (2018) 50.8 40.6
F1 2018 (2018) 92 58
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 53 47
FIFA 19 (2018) 205 203
Forza Horizon 4 (2018) 85 66
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) 52 37
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) 69.4 63.1

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
32 / 33 / 44 dB(A)
Hårddisk
33 dB(A)
Hög belastning
46 / 50 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Asus TUF FX705GM
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
8%
6%
4%
7%
14%
off / environment *
29
28.6
1%
30
-3%
29
-0%
29
-0%
24.1 ?(19.5 - 29.9, n=183, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Minimum *
32
29.4
8%
30
6%
31
3%
29
9%
25.6 ?(21.9 - 41.6, n=185, last 2 years)
20%
Idle Average *
33
29.4
11%
34
-3%
32
3%
31
6%
27.4 ?(21.9 - 42.1, n=185, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Maximum *
44
33.7
23%
36
18%
44
-0%
33
25%
30.7 ?(21.9 - 47, n=185, last 2 years)
30%
Load Average *
46
41.2
10%
43
7%
44
4%
45
2%
43.1 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=185, last 2 years)
6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
47.3
1%
45
6%
42
12%
45
6%
Load Maximum *
50
48.3
3%
45
10%
46
8%
51
-2%
53.4 ?(42.1 - 68.2, n=185, last 2 years)
-7%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 49 °C51 °C54 °C 
 41 °C48 °C45 °C 
 28 °C31 °C31 °C 
Max: 54 °C
Medel: 42 °C
53 °C46 °C47 °C
51 °C40 °C39 °C
29 °C24 °C30 °C
Max: 53 °C
Medel: 39.9 °C
Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
Asus TUF FX705GM
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-3%
-8%
-4%
-0%
2%
Maximum Upper Side *
54
54.6
-1%
58
-7%
55
-2%
50
7%
46 ?(28.2 - 60, n=183, last 2 years)
15%
Maximum Bottom *
53
41.2
22%
63
-19%
49
8%
52
2%
49.5 ?(30 - 66.3, n=183, last 2 years)
7%
Idle Upper Side *
30
35
-17%
32
-7%
32
-7%
33
-10%
31.4 ?(21.2 - 42.8, n=183, last 2 years)
-5%
Idle Bottom *
30
35.2
-17%
30
-0%
34
-13%
30
-0%
32.5 ?(22.6 - 45, n=183, last 2 years)
-8%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.644.72537.338.43131.630.64030.536.25026.2296325.829.78026.627.510025.129.512523.130.716021.24020023.448.625023.253.431520.456.140019.157.450017.859.263017.864.480016.965.6100017.764.1125017.961.2160017.763.9200017.366.1250017.567.4315017.566.7400017.566.6500017.664.1630017.362800017.258.11000017.155.51250017.148.81600017.148.7SPL29.976.4N1.337.8median 17.7median 59.2Delta1.88.140.639.133.836.432.635.734.933.732.233.631.535.7323831.243.428.847.72856.628.460.126.962.926.46325.961.525.762.824.966.824.669.224.367.62462.624.162.42463.423.867.423.759.82467.223.569.723.764.923.665.923.657.823.552.723.646.236.377.82.744.4median 24.1median 62.81.44.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus TUF FX705GMAsus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus TUF FX705GM audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.8 / 2.2 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 13 / 17 / 24 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 106 / 179 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus TUF FX705GM
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-18%
10%
20%
36%
-15%
Idle Minimum *
13
18.88
-45%
8
38%
11
15%
6
54%
13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=179, last 2 years)
-6%
Idle Average *
17
24.36
-43%
14
18%
14
18%
9
47%
19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=179, last 2 years)
-13%
Idle Maximum *
24
32.27
-34%
22
8%
20
17%
13
46%
27 ?(9 - 101.1, n=179, last 2 years)
-13%
Load Average *
106
107.74
-2%
92
13%
96
9%
95
10%
111.3 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years)
-5%
Witcher 3 ultra *
151
142
6%
154
-2%
97
36%
102
32%
Load Maximum *
179
160.28
10%
207
-16%
136
24%
134
25%
251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years)
-40%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
6tim 20min
WiFi Websurfing
4tim 32min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4tim 20min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 35min
Asus TUF FX705GM
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh		Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 74 Wh		MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 51 Wh		SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 48 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-21%
-24%
57%
41%
30%
Reader / Idle
380
320
-16%
346
-9%
704
85%
710
87%
544 ?(57 - 1290, n=83, last 2 years)
43%
H.264
260
399 ?(56 - 747, n=92, last 2 years)
53%
WiFi v1.3
272
213
-22%
200
-26%
378
39%
354
30%
368 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years)
35%
Load
95
70
-26%
60
-37%
141
48%
100
5%
84.2 ?(36 - 173, n=143, last 2 years)
-11%

För

+ RGB-belysning
+ 144 Hz-skärm
+ NVMe-SSD
+ Tunn infattning

Emot

- mycket oljud vid 3D-belastning
- begränsat portutbud
- ljudet imponerar inte
Asus TUF FX705GM, recensionsex från Asus Germany
Asus TUF FX705GM, recensionsex från Asus Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Med sin TUF-serie visar Asus att en potent spellaptop inte behöver vara överdrivet dyr.

Bortsett från det magra portutbudet (ingen kortläsare, ingen Thunderbolt 3, ingen USB 3.1 Gen 2) och det medelmåttiga ljudet så är det inte mycket som saknas hos FX705. Denna modell på 17 tum med sin blixtsnabba 144 Hz-skärm med hög kontrast drivs av en sexkärnig processor och ett välpresterande GeForce GTX 1060.

Höljet och batteritiden är heller inte så dåliga. Chassits kvalitet bör göra de flesta köpare nöjda. Dessutom kommer gamers vara glada över det RGB-belysta tangentbordet (Var försiktig: det finns två varianter av höljet med flera skillnader; se ovan).

Men det finns en hälsosam mängd konkurrens i 17-tumssektorn, såsom MSI GS73, Schenker XMG A707 och Acer Predator Helios 300. Även om de två sistnämnda modellerna hamnade en aning efter i fråga om poäng (82% istället för 83%) så har MSI fått aningen bättre poäng totalt.

Asus TUF FX705GM - 10/19/2018 v6(old)
Florian Glaser

Design
80 / 98 → 82%
Tangentbord
81%
Mus
78%
Anslutningar
52 / 81 → 64%
Vikt
58 / 10-66 → 86%
Batteri
77%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
92%
Programprestanda
98%
Temperatur
83 / 95 → 88%
Ljudnivå
65 / 90 → 72%
Audio
60%
Medel
76%
83%
Gaming - Vägt medel

More articles related to this device

Asus TUF FX705GM (TUF FX705 Serie)
Test
•
Test: Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT ...

Pricecompare

Asus TUF FX705GM
Asus TUF FX705GM
Asus TUF FX705GM
Asus TUF FX705GM
Asus TUF FX705GM
Asus TUF FX705GM
Asus TUF FX705GM
Asus TUF FX705GM
Asus TUF FX705GM
Asus TUF FX705GM
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Asus TUF FX705GM (i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Florian Glaser, 2018-10-22 (Update: 2018-10-22)