Notebookcheck Logo

Test: MSI GT76 9SG - En Titan bland bärbara speldatorer

Designad för att vara kraftfull. Splitter nya GT76 Titan DT från MSI kommer i synnerhet attrahera passionerade gamers som kan leva med ett stort och tungt chassi. Tack vare en Core i9-9900K och ett GeForce RTX 2080 har denna laptop på 17 tum massor av kraft åt moderna spel.
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG (GT76 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i9-9900K 8 x 3.6 - 5 GHz, Coffee Lake-R, I sockel
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1575 MHz, Minne: 7000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 425.31, Optimus
Minne
64 GB 
, 4x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dubbla kanaler, alla platser upptagna; max. 128 GB
Skärm
17.30 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 127 PPI, Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, Full HD, 144 Hz, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Cannon Lake Z390 (Cannon Lake-H)
Hårddisk
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), 512 GB 
, NVMe SSD:s + WDC WD10SPZX, 1 TB HDD, 5400 rpm, Platser: Tre M.2 2280-platser (en ledig) & en enhetsplats på 2.5 tum
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Anslutningar
6 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: 1x Hörlurar, 1x Mikrofon, Kortläsare: MicroSD
Nätverk
Killer E3000 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 42 x 397 x 330
Batteri
90 Wh, 6250 mAh Litiumjon, 8 celler
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: FHD
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2.1 Dynaudio, Tangentbord: Chiclet, RGB, SteelSeries, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Två 230-watts nätadaptrar, Diverse verktyg från tillverkaren, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
4.167 kg, Strömförsörjning: 1.87 kg
Pris
4560 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76

Storleksjämförelse

425 mm 319 mm 51 mm 4.7 kg418 mm 295 mm 41 mm 4.3 kg402.6 mm 319.2 mm 42 mm 3.9 kg397 mm 330 mm 42 mm 4.2 kg397 mm 268.5 mm 27.5 mm 2.7 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Vänster: anslutning för nätadapter, 1x Gigabit Ethernet-port, 1x Thunderbolt 3-port, 2x USB 3.1 Gen2 Typ A-portar, hörlursanslutning, mikrofonanslutning
Vänster: anslutning för nätadapter, 1x Gigabit Ethernet-port, 1x Thunderbolt 3-port, 2x USB 3.1 Gen2 Typ A-portar, hörlursanslutning, mikrofonanslutning
Höger: microSD-kortläsare, 2x USB 3.1 Gen2 Typ A-portar, 1x USB 3.1 Gen2 Typ C-port, 1x Mini DisplayPort 1.4-port, 1x HDMI 2.0-port
Höger: microSD-kortläsare, 2x USB 3.1 Gen2 Typ A-portar, 1x USB 3.1 Gen2 Typ C-port, 1x Mini DisplayPort 1.4-port, 1x HDMI 2.0-port
Baksidan: Inga portar
Baksidan: Inga portar
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)
1139 MBit/s +56%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
730 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
712 MBit/s -2%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
682 MBit/s -7%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
680 MBit/s -7%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
629 MBit/s -14%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)
1379 MBit/s +100%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
690 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
673 MBit/s -2%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
671 MBit/s -3%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
661 MBit/s -4%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
652 MBit/s -6%
378
cd/m²
380
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
355
cd/m²
380
cd/m²
373
cd/m²
353
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 396 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 372.7 cd/m² Minimum: 21 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 396 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1200:1 (Svärta: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.04 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.82
ΔE Greyscale 2.83 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 1920x1080
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
LG Philips 173WFG, IPS, 1920x1080
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160
MSI GE75 9SG
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, AHVA, 1920x1080
Asus ROG G703GX
AU Optronics B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 1920x1080
Display
4%
33%
-1%
2%
Display P3 Coverage
62.3
66.3
6%
86.3
39%
61.5
-1%
64.1
3%
sRGB Coverage
93.4
96.9
4%
100
7%
92
-1%
93.3
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
64.3
66.5
3%
99.1
54%
63.5
-1%
65.6
2%
Response Times
-37%
-268%
15%
7%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8 ?(4.4, 3.6)
13.2 ?(8, 5.2)
-65%
41.6 ?(20.4, 21.2)
-420%
7.2 ?(3.8, 3.4)
10%
7.2 ?(3.8, 3.4)
10%
Response Time Black / White *
10 ?(5.2, 4.8)
10.8 ?(6, 4.8)
-8%
21.6 ?(9.6, 12)
-116%
6.6 ?(3.2, 3.4)
34%
9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2)
4%
PWM Frequency
26040 ?(20)
26040 ?(10)
0%
Screen
-31%
-33%
2%
-44%
Brightness middle
396
335.2
-15%
343
-13%
400.7
1%
296
-25%
Brightness
373
297
-20%
328
-12%
372
0%
279
-25%
Brightness Distribution
89
82
-8%
82
-8%
89
0%
85
-4%
Black Level *
0.33
0.66
-100%
0.31
6%
0.34
-3%
0.25
24%
Contrast
1200
508
-58%
1106
-8%
1179
-2%
1184
-1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.04
2.02
1%
5.03
-147%
1.33
35%
4.77
-134%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.85
7.23
-88%
7.91
-105%
3.51
9%
9.08
-136%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.82
1.17
-43%
0.86
-5%
1.39
-70%
1.46
-78%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.83
3.2
-13%
6.29
-122%
1.3
54%
5.83
-106%
Gamma
2.49 88%
2.16 102%
2.38 92%
2.24 98%
2.47 89%
CCT
7113 91%
6746 96%
6389 102%
6735 97%
8076 80%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
61.3
4%
88
49%
58.2
-1%
60
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94
96.9
3%
100
6%
92.1
-2%
93
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-21% / -25%
-89% / -50%
5% / 4%
-12% / -29%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 26040 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 26040 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 26040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
01052103154205256307358409451050115512601365147015751680178518901995Tooltip
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Intel Core i9-9900K, Intel Core i9-9900K: Ø1998 (1943.92-2022.14)
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 Intel Core i9-9900K, Intel Core i9-9900K: Ø1875 (1847.15-1952.27)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing Intel Core i9-9900K, Intel Core i9-9900K: Ø1887 (1858.65-1934.33)
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2022 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
212 Points
Hjälp
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=231, last 2 years)
268 Points +26%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
212 Points
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
Intel Core i9-9900K
207 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K
207 Points -2%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points -11%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
167 Points -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=232, last 2 years)
3090 Points +53%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
2022 Points
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
Intel Core i9-9900K
1979 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K
1944 Points -4%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points -15%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1212 Points -40%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=228, last 2 years)
698 Points +37%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
509 Points
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
441 Points -13%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=228, last 2 years)
7423 Points +51%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
4926 Points
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
3712 Points -25%
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)
7580 Points +15%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
7050 Points +7%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)
7006 Points +6%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
6599 Points
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6306 Points -4%
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5680 Points -14%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
MSI GE75 9SG
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Asus ROG G703GX
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
20%
25%
-3%
-15%
Write 4K
101.4
111.1
10%
183.2
81%
116.1
14%
90.4
-11%
Read 4K
40.57
45.47
12%
52.4
29%
44.98
11%
39.19
-3%
Write Seq
2229
2454
10%
1790
-20%
2370
6%
1863
-16%
Read Seq
2528
2212
-12%
1743
-31%
1465
-42%
2100
-17%
Write 4K Q32T1
379.6
622
64%
550
45%
337.5
-11%
260.2
-31%
Read 4K Q32T1
421.9
695
65%
648
54%
453.6
8%
297
-30%
Write Seq Q32T1
2439
2675
10%
3236
33%
2399
-2%
1870
-23%
Read Seq Q32T1
3199
3184
0%
3538
11%
3087
-4%
3471
9%
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
58737 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
21988 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
10290 poäng
Hjälp
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100Tooltip
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0): Ø95.9 (90-101)
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=235, last 2 years)
29450 Points +17%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
27080 Points +8%
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
26223 Points +4%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
25126 Points
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
24623 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
23089 Points -8%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=233, last 2 years)
12063 Points +18%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
10720 Points +5%
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
10364 Points +1%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
10243 Points
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
9754 Points -5%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (280 - 14457, n=155, last 2 years)
7720 Points +36%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
5852 Points +3%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
5660 Points
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
5649 Points 0%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
5538 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
5383 Points -5%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=226, last 2 years)
117.1 fps +17%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
101.1 fps +1%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
100 fps
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H
99.7 fps 0%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
95.3 fps -5%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
94.5 fps -5%
låg med. hög ultraQHD4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 186 100 66.9
Apex Legends (2019) 144 144 144 128 75
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 128 121 108 96 57
Metro Exodus (2019) 109 82.2 68.3 54.4 35.6
Anthem (2019) 130 120 112 83.7 48.6
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 212 171 101 79.2
The Division 2 (2019) 169 136 103 72 40
Anno 1800 (2019) 115 92.2 54.3 47.8 34.9
Rage 2 (2019) 144 122 119 78.1 39.1

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
33 / 34 / 44 dB(A)
Hög belastning
47 / 59 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Asus ROG G703GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
4%
5%
10%
5%
18%
off / environment *
30
28.1
6%
30
-0%
28.2
6%
30
-0%
Idle Minimum *
33
28.1
15%
30
9%
30.4
8%
30
9%
Idle Average *
34
28.6
16%
33
3%
30.4
11%
35
-3%
Idle Maximum *
44
51
-16%
35
20%
33.4
24%
41
7%
Load Average *
47
51
-9%
44
6%
37.1
21%
44
6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53
51
4%
55
-4%
54.2
-2%
51
4%
Load Maximum *
59
51
14%
58
2%
56.4
4%
52
12%

* ... smaller is better

 42 °C42 °C51 °C 
 41 °C42 °C42 °C 
 33 °C36 °C34 °C 
Max: 51 °C
Medel: 40.3 °C
57 °C53 °C45 °C
50 °C48 °C45 °C
36 °C33 °C34 °C
Max: 57 °C
Medel: 44.6 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  53 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Asus ROG G703GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-10%
-6%
-21%
-5%
-3%
Maximum Upper Side *
51
47
8%
45
12%
48.8
4%
50
2%
Maximum Bottom *
57
58.8
-3%
45
21%
52
9%
50
12%
Idle Upper Side *
26
31
-19%
36
-38%
36.2
-39%
30
-15%
Idle Bottom *
28
35
-25%
33
-18%
44.4
-59%
33
-18%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.835.32541.340.43131.833.84036.338.65030.442.86326.248.78029.443.810025.354.612523.258.716027.96520022.962.125021.971.331520.973.240019.776.550018.777.86301879.780017.488100017.583.2125018.772.6160017.472.5200017.273250017.570.6315017.470.9400017.370.1500017.668.7630017.364.6800017.365.71000017.258.91250017.361.51600017.160.2SPL30.189.8N1.478.1median 17.5median 70.9Delta1.76.443.442.537.237.3303835.538.427.136.327.338.327.247.328.253.225.154.322.464.223.370.42273.920.676.718.877.919.372.318.363.717.866.918.371.817.681.217.184.417.285.917.183.717.179.517.272.717.180.61779.417.177.117.170.717.26516.966.429.892.71.394.7median 17.6median 73.91.97.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GT76 Titan DT 9SGMSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 1.1 / 2.6 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 14 / 18 / 23 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 114 / 443 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Asus ROG G703GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-42%
-74%
8%
-4%
5%
Idle Minimum *
14
23.3
-66%
39
-179%
13.9
1%
5
64%
Idle Average *
18
33.5
-86%
45
-150%
18.8
-4%
24
-33%
Idle Maximum *
23
38.4
-67%
55
-139%
23.1
-0%
42
-83%
Load Average *
114
114.1
-0%
122
-7%
112.3
1%
112
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
283
339.5
-20%
259
8%
231
18%
284
-0%
Load Maximum *
443
485.1
-10%
346
22%
291.5
34%
320
28%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
6tim 49min
WiFi Websurfing
5tim 02min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
0tim 52min
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 90 Wh
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 90 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 82 Wh
MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh
Asus ROG G703GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 96 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-31%
-30%
-3%
1%
39%
Reader / Idle
409
155
-62%
165
-60%
301
-26%
WiFi v1.3
302
127
-58%
135
-55%
294
-3%
238
-21%
Load
52
66
27%
65
25%
78
50%
H.264
135
226

För

+ många möjligheter till underhåll och uppgraderingar
+ massor av portar
+ bra inmatningsenheter
+ utmärkt prestanda
+ RGB-belysning
+ tunn infattning
+ 144 Hz

Emot

- låter riktigt mycket vid belastning
- riktigt stor baksida
- väldigt tung
- två nätadaptrar
- har ej stöd för G-Sync
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG; recensionsex från MSI Taiwan.
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG; recensionsex från MSI Taiwan.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

GT76 9SG Titan DT är en extraordinär spellaptop, åtminstone så länge det gäller pris och prestanda. Den klarar av riktigt snabb bilduppdatering även i extremt krävande titlar.

Den förstklassiga prestandan kommer på bekostnad av ljudnivån, vilket kan skrämma bort en del intresserade kunder (vi rekommenderar att använda hörlurar när man spelar på GT76). Men om du bortser från den rejäla vikten, den stora baksidan och de två nätadaptrarna så finns det inte mycket att klaga på.

GT76 drar till sig din uppmärksamhet med massor av portar (Thunderbolt 3), bra inmatningsenheter och skaplig ljudkvalitet. Den tunt infattade 144 Hz-skärmen har bra bild och är mer än tillräcklig för en enhet med denna prislapp. Du får heller inte glömma de utförliga underhålls- och servicemöjligheterna.

Pricecompare

MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: MSI GT76 9SG - En Titan bland bärbara speldatorer
Florian Glaser, 2019-07- 2 (Update: 2019-07- 2)