Notebookcheck

Test: Schenker XMG Ultra 15 (i7-9700K, RTX 2070) Clevo P751TM1-G Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 03/14/2019

Uppgraderingsbar toppskiktsenhet som presterar. Schenkers XMG Ultra 15 har kraftfull hårdvara som är kapabel att köra alla aktuella spel smidigt. Dessutom har den utförliga möjligheter till underhåll och uppgraderingar - inklusive möjligheten att byta både CPU och GPU.

Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Processor
Intel Core i7-9700K, i sockel
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Kärna: 1215 MHz, Minne: 1750 MHz, 256-bit GDDR6, ForceWare 419.17, no Optimus
Minne
32768 MB 
, SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dubbla kanaler, totalt fyra platser (två används)
Skärm
15.6 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), IPS, 144 Hz, G-Sync, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Z370 (Kaby Lake)
Hårddisk
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB 
, 2 st M.2-platser (RAID 0/1 kapabel), 2 st SATA III-platser (RAID 0/1 kapabel)
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC898 @ Intel Kaby Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: line-in, line-ut, mikrofoningång, 2-i-1 ljudutgång (hörlurar + optisk S/PDIF), Kortläsare: SD, SDHC, SDXC, Mini SD, MMC, RSMMC, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, TPM 2.0
Nätverk
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 5
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 38 x 386 x 262
Batteri
82 Wh, 5400 mAh Litiumjon, removeable, 14.8 V
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2.1, Tangentbord: Chiclet, RGB med 3 zoner, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Nätadapter på 330 W, återställnings-DVD, DVD med drivrutiner, 16 GB USB-minne, manual, nyckelring, ett års licens för Bullguard Internet Security, Control Center, 36 Månader Garanti
Vikt
3.52 kg, Strömförsörjning: 1.246 kg
Pris
3248 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

390 mm 266 mm 39.8 mm 3.1 kg386 mm 262 mm 38 mm 3.5 kg389 mm 305 mm 25 mm 3.5 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.1 kg
Höger: line-in, mikrofon-in, line-ut, 2-i-1 ljud (hörlurar + optisk S/PDIF), USB 2.0 Type-A, USB 3.1 Gen 1 Typ A, kabellås
Höger: line-in, mikrofon-in, line-ut, 2-i-1 ljud (hörlurar + optisk S/PDIF), USB 2.0 Type-A, USB 3.1 Gen 1 Typ A, kabellås
Vänster: Gigabit Ethernet, Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.1 Gen 2 Typ C, 2x USB 3.1 Gen 1 Typ A, kortläsare
Vänster: Gigabit Ethernet, Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.1 Gen 2 Typ C, 2x USB 3.1 Gen 1 Typ A, kortläsare
Baksidan: HDMI 2.0, 2x Mini DisplayPort 1.4, ström
Baksidan: HDMI 2.0, 2x Mini DisplayPort 1.4, ström
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
200 MB/s ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
193 MB/s ∼97%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
185 MB/s ∼93% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=224)
91.1 MB/s ∼46% -53%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s ∼100% +14%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
212 MB/s ∼88%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
207 MB/s ∼86% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=222)
110 MB/s ∼45% -48%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
693 MBit/s ∼100%
Alienware 15 R4
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
690 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
686 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
671 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=223)
599 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Alienware 15 R4
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
692 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s ∼99% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s ∼98% +4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s ∼95% 0%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
654 MBit/s ∼95%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
641 MBit/s ∼93% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 721, n=223)
547 MBit/s ∼79% -16%
265
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
275
cd/m²
251
cd/m²
263
cd/m²
256
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
258
cd/m²
269
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 281 cd/m² Medel: 264.3 cd/m² Minimum: 12 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 263 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1547:1 (Svärta: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.45 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 1.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.77 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
93% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.52
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
AU Optronics B156HTN05.2 (AUO52ED), TN, 1920x1080
Alienware 15 R4
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD0540), IPS, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Predator Triton 500
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
-1%
-101%
1%
7%
34%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
17.6 (9.2, 8.4)
24.2 (13.4, 10.8)
-38%
37.6 (18.8, 18.8)
-114%
16.4 (8.8, 7.6)
7%
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
5%
8 (4, 4)
55%
Response Time Black / White *
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
8 (5.6, 2.4)
37%
24 (13.2, 10.8)
-88%
13.6 (8.4, 5.2)
-6%
11.6 (7.2, 4.4)
9%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
12%
PWM Frequency
20830 (99)
Screen
-47%
-14%
8%
-0%
-8%
Brightness middle
263
363
38%
292
11%
250
-5%
314.7
20%
304
16%
Brightness
264
365
38%
278
5%
235
-11%
312
18%
299
13%
Brightness Distribution
89
74
-17%
88
-1%
85
-4%
90
1%
89
0%
Black Level *
0.17
0.58
-241%
0.29
-71%
0.29
-71%
0.38
-124%
0.27
-59%
Contrast
1547
626
-60%
1007
-35%
862
-44%
828
-46%
1126
-27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.45
8.7
-96%
4.9
-10%
1.46
67%
2.56
42%
4.66
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.33
12.91
-55%
10.08
-21%
2.47
70%
4.89
41%
9.65
-16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.93
2.36
-22%
2.27
-18%
1.71
11%
1.72
11%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.77
9.26
-94%
4.89
-3%
1.27
73%
3.4
29%
5.53
-16%
Gamma
2.52 87%
2.16 102%
2.36 93%
2.4 92%
2.3 96%
2.5 88%
CCT
7767 84%
9390 69%
7598 86%
6749 96%
6435 101%
8028 81%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
59
-2%
56
-7%
60
0%
60.7
1%
60
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
91
-2%
86
-8%
93
0%
94.6
2%
93
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-24% / -40%
-58% / -28%
5% / 6%
4% / 1%
13% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 8.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9554 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
Intel XTU
 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320133013401350136013701380139014001410142014301440145014601470Tooltip
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing Intel Core i7-9700K, Intel Core i7-9700K: Ø1449 (1441.6-1465.07)
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Intel Core i5-8600K, Intel Core i5-8600K: Ø988 (976.37-994.09)
Alienware 15 R4 Intel Core i9-8950HK, Intel Core i9-8950HK: Ø1064 (1038.8-1083)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1095 (1087.31-1156.25)
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø980 (961.82-1019.05)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø922 (913.2-999)
CPU-klockfrekvenser när vi körde CB15-loopen
CPU-klockfrekvenser när vi körde CB15-loopen
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7682
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
42677
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
14667
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
203 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1465 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
140.95 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Hjälp
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
203 Points ∼100%
Alienware 15 R4
Intel Core i9-8950HK
197 Points ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Intel Core i5-8600K
181 Points ∼89% -11%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points ∼87% -13%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼86% -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 212, n=466)
154 Points ∼76% -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
1465 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1156 Points ∼79% -21%
Alienware 15 R4
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1083 Points ∼74% -26%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1019 Points ∼70% -30%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
999 Points ∼68% -32%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Intel Core i5-8600K
991 Points ∼68% -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1979, n=469)
791 Points ∼54% -46%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
7682 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Intel Core i5-8600K
6875 Points ∼89% -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
6351 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.85 - 8872, n=414)
4783 Points ∼62% -38%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
42677 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
33923 Points ∼79% -21%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Intel Core i5-8600K
32863 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.7 - 48808, n=414)
17926 Points ∼42% -58%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
27774 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
21358 Points ∼77% -23%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Intel Core i5-8600K
18970 Points ∼68% -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (9307 - 27774, n=66)
15588 Points ∼56% -44%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
4825 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Intel Core i5-8600K
4217 Points ∼87% -13%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
3741 Points ∼78% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (2926 - 4825, n=66)
3643 Points ∼76% -24%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
26471 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
17795 Points ∼67% -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (8085 - 26471, n=29)
15155 Points ∼57% -43%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
5744 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
4692 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (3387 - 5744, n=29)
4476 Points ∼78% -22%
Geekbench 4.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
28792 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
18716 Points ∼65% -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (4116 - 32070, n=41)
18444 Points ∼64% -36%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
5925 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
4810 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (2131 - 6030, n=41)
4702 Points ∼79% -21%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (753 - 7545, n=157)
1229 ms * ∼100% -30%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
1138.1 ms * ∼93% -20%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
1125.7 ms * ∼92% -19%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Intel Core i5-8600K (Edge 41)
1021.6 ms * ∼83% -8%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K (Edge 44)
948.2 ms * ∼77%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K (Edge 44)
41962 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
33659 Points ∼80% -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (12288 - 49518, n=152)
32936 Points ∼78% -22%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
30594 Points ∼73% -27%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K (Edge 44)
297.17 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
255.92 Points ∼86% -14%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Intel Core i5-8600K (Edge 41)
255.63 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (51.6 - 333, n=156)
249 Points ∼84% -16%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
245.41 Points ∼83% -17%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score
8114 poäng
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5485 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6780 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6258 poäng
Hjälp
PCMark 10 - Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6868 Points ∼100%
Alienware 15 R4
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
6008 Points ∼87% -13%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
5883 Points ∼86% -14%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8600K, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5779 Points ∼84% -16%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points ∼79% -21%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5353 Points ∼78% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=161)
5103 Points ∼74% -26%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6258 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5645 Points ∼90% -10%
Alienware 15 R4
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
5632 Points ∼90% -10%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8600K, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5618 Points ∼90% -10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5607 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=350)
4988 Points ∼80% -20%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Alienware 15 R4
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
5541 Points ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8600K, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5512 Points ∼99% 0%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5485 Points ∼99%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
4338 Points ∼78% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=368)
4246 Points ∼77% -23%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4150 Points ∼75% -24%
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Sequential Read: 1895 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1773 MB/s
512K Read: 1155 MB/s
512K Write: 1320 MB/s
4K Read: 68.14 MB/s
4K Write: 160 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 619.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 521.8 MB/s
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
Alienware 15 R4
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Acer Predator Triton 500
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-5%
-27%
-15%
-16%
-2%
Write 4K
129.9
147.7
14%
96.85
-25%
97.13
-25%
93.88
-28%
93.6
-28%
Read 4K
47.15
44.02
-7%
35.73
-24%
53.66
14%
40.56
-14%
38.82
-18%
Write Seq
1840
1641
-11%
362.3
-80%
1526
-17%
1468
-20%
2455
33%
Read Seq
1775
1830
3%
2110
19%
2020
14%
1540
-13%
2107
19%
Write 4K Q32T1
294.5
325.9
11%
318.6
8%
285.6
-3%
293.5
0%
298.7
1%
Read 4K Q32T1
373.6
369.1
-1%
366.7
-2%
321.8
-14%
346
-7%
338.7
-9%
Write Seq Q32T1
3295
1847
-44%
351
-89%
1533
-53%
1941
-41%
2902
-12%
Read Seq Q32T1
3535
3344
-5%
2813
-20%
2351
-33%
3266
-8%
3536
0%
3DMark 06 Standard
43781 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
22748 poäng
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
227837 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
43983 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18616 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
7832 poäng
Hjälp
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (3020 - 5942, n=29)
4310 Points ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
4155 Points ∼96%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3679 Points ∼85% -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3557 Points ∼83% -14%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
7815 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6728 Points ∼86% -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6562 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=111)
5525 Points ∼71% -29%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
20759 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
18935 Points ∼91% -9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18153 Points ∼87% -13%
Alienware 15 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17675 Points ∼85% -15%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17598 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=492)
10922 Points ∼53% -47%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator Triton 500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28083 Points ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
26975 Points ∼96%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
24873 Points ∼89% -8%
Alienware 15 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
23308 Points ∼83% -14%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22723 Points ∼81% -16%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22089 Points ∼79% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=567)
12759 Points ∼45% -53%
låg med. hög ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 400.7346320.9187.8fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 331.2223.1128.473fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 214202159108fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 112.410298.6fps
Civilization VI (2016) 224.1163.6129.8121.1fps
Destiny 2 (2017) 206.1181.2169.5144.5fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 128.4114.192.5fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 147125115109fps
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
76.5 (min: 63) fps ∼100% +5%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K
73 (min: 60) fps ∼95%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
68.9 fps ∼90% -6%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8600K
65.3 fps ∼85% -11%
Alienware 15 R4
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK
59.5 fps ∼78% -18%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
58.3 (min: 48) fps ∼76% -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=266)
47.8 fps ∼62% -35%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K
187.8 fps ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
152.5 fps ∼81% -19%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
127.7 fps ∼68% -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.7 - 266, n=305)
93.2 fps ∼50% -50%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K
109 fps ∼100%
Alienware 15 R4
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK
88 fps ∼81% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (10 - 113, n=32)
69.8 fps ∼64% -36%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
67 fps ∼61% -39%
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB; The Witcher 3: Ø74.3 (70-77)
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8600K, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe; The Witcher 3: Ø62.6 (59-67)
Alienware 15 R4 GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G; The Witcher 3: Ø59.6 (54-64)
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0); The Witcher 3: Ø76.1 (70-81)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; The Witcher 3: Ø62.2 (57-70)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8; The Witcher 3: Ø51.3 (44-61)

Ljudnivå</