Notebookcheck Logo

Recension av Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model från början av 2022 - Kompakt spellaptop med snabb skärm

En ännu vassare rakhyvel. Nya Razer Blade 15 har helt nya 12:e generationens Intel-processorer och en Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti/3080 Ti. Tillsammans med en blixtsnabb 360 Hz-panel utlovar detta en otroligt jämn skärm. Ta reda på hur det lilla chassit klarar av den kraftfulla hårdvaran i följande recension.
Marius Schell, 👁 Florian Glaser (översatt av DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Razer Blade 15 2022, vårmodellen Razer Blade 15 2022, är utrustad med de senaste Intel- och Nvidia-chipsen och lovar iterativa förbättringar för den populära serien av bärbara 15-tums gamingdatorer. Den största skillnaden mellan den modell som recenseras här och den tidigare recenserade Blade 15 2022 är 1080p 360 Hz-panelen, så läsarna kan hålla sig till den här recensionen för detaljer om de i stort sett identiska fysiska specifikationerna. Blade 15:s direkta konkurrenter är bland annat andra högpresterande bärbara 15,6-tums gamingdatorer med hög prestanda, t.ex Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22, den Asus ROG Strix Scar 15, den MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS och MSI Vector GP66 12UGS.

Ytterligare recensioner av Razer:

Blade 15 Profimodell Frühjahr 2022 (Blade 15 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12800H 14 x 1.8 - 4.8 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16384 MB, Kärna: 1125 MHz, Minne: 1750 MHz, 110 W TDP, GDDR6, 511,69, Optimus
Minne
32768 MB 
, Quad-channel DDR5-4800
Skärm
15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, glansig: nej, 360 Hz
Moderkort
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Hårddisk
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4
Ljudkort
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Anslutningar
5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5mm headset, Kortläsare: SD card reader
Nätverk
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 16.99 x 355 x 235
Batteri
80 Wh, 5209 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webbkamera: 1080p webcam
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Secondary Camera: IR camera
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Razer Synapse, 12 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.09 kg, Strömförsörjning: 646 g
Pris
4099 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Jämförelse av potentiella konkurrenter

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.3 %
05/2022
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg16.99 mm15.60"1920x1080
89.1 %
03/2022
Razer Blade 15 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg16.99 mm15.60"2560x1440
03/2022
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.2 kg26.6 mm15.60"2560x1440
86.3 %
09/2021
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg27.2 mm15.60"2560x1440
84.5 %
02/2022
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.2 kg19.8 mm15.60"2560x1440
86.9 %
03/2022
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23.4 mm15.60"1920x1080

Hölje - Kompakt och lämplig för resor

I fallet ser vi återigen den välbekanta, smidiga metallkonstruktionen som Blade-serien ursprungligen gjorde sig känd för. Stabilitet, utförande och torsionsbeständighet är alltså fortfarande utmärkta. Baksidan är den höga känsligheten för fingeravtryck

Razer Blade 15 är en mycket kompakt bärbar dator på 15,6 tum och är både mindre och tunnare än de flesta av sina konkurrenter. I synnerhet ROG Strix Scar 15 och XMG Neo 15 E22 är betydligt tjockare och cirka 100-200 g tyngre än vår 2,1 kg tunga granskningsenhet.

Storleksjämförelse

360.2 mm 243.5 mm 26.6 mm 2.2 kg358 mm 267 mm 23.4 mm 2.3 kg354 mm 259 mm 27.2 mm 2.3 kg358 mm 248 mm 19.8 mm 2.2 kg355 mm 235 mm 16.99 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 16.99 mm 2.1 kg

Hårdvara - Blade 15 har moderna anslutningsmöjligheter

Det finns inga stora överraskningar när det gäller anslutningsmöjligheter. Värt att nämna är den fullfjädrade SD-kortläsaren och HDMI-porten, som stöder version 2.1. Till skillnad från många konkurrenter som t.ex XMG Neo 15 E22finns det ingen dedikerad LAN-port här. Men detta kan rättas till via en Thunderbolt-dockapparat om det behövs.

Till vänster: strömkontakt, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2, 3,5 mm ljudkontakt
Till vänster: strömkontakt, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2, 3,5 mm ljudkontakt
Just det: SD-kortläsare, Thunderbolt, USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2, HDMI 2.1, låsbar port
Just det: SD-kortläsare, Thunderbolt, USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2, HDMI 2.1, låsbar port

SD-kortläsare

SD-kortläsarens prestanda är på en hög nivå. I det sekventiella AS-SSD-läsningstestet med vårt microSD AV PRO 128GB V60-kort inträffade ett fel på vår granskningsenhet

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
165.4 MB/s ∼100% +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
155 MB/s ∼94%
Average of class Gaming
  (18 - 222, n=93, last 2 years)
117.3 MB/s ∼71% -24%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
68.3 (65.41min - 69.52max) MB/s ∼41% -56%

Kommunikation

Den integrerade Killer Wi-Fi 6E 1690i-modulen gav mycket snabba överföringshastigheter när den var ansluten till vår testrouter Asus GT-AXE11000. Bluetooth 5.2-stöd finns också

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1621 (1412min - 1672max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (851 - 1695, n=12, last 2 years)
1443 MBit/s ∼89% -11%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1727 (866min - 1759max) MBit/s ∼100%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1569 (622min - 1690max) MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (787 - 1727, n=13, last 2 years)
1549 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1697 (866-1759)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 GT-AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1621 (1412-1672)

Webbkamera


ColorChecker
10.7 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
15 ∆E
16 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022: 12.53 ∆E min: 2.28 - max: 18.39 ∆E

Underhåll

Efter att ha tagit bort sex Torxskruvar (T5) har man tillgång till båda RAM-modulerna, batteriet, WLAN-modulen och (efter att ha tagit bort ytterligare ett skydd) M.2 SSD-modulen

Razer Blade 15 2022 - inre arbete

Inmatningsenheter - Stor klickplatta och snyggt tangentbord

Tangentbord

Tangentbordet har RGB-tangentbelysning med 16 ljusstyrkor (inklusive "off") och halvhöga pil-upp- och pil-ned-tangenter, vilket gör att Razer kan placera hela tangentbordet i ett rektangulärt område centrerat mellan högtalaröppningarna. Tangenterna erbjuder en platt tangentväg och tyst, dämpat skrivljud. Tangentmotståndet är måttligt och tangentbordets mitt ger knappt efter när man skriver.

Razer Blade 15 2022 - Inmatningsenheter
Razer Blade 15 2022 - Bakgrundsbelysning

Pekplatta

Pekplattan har en yta på cirka 13x8 cm och ger en utmärkt glidning med fingrarna. Klickarna kännetecknas av en kort tangentväg och tydlig haptisk återkoppling

Skärm - Snabb panel med begränsat färgspektrum

Subpixel
Subpixel

I vår recensionsmodell finns en matt IPS-panel i full HD med en ursprunglig upplösning på 1920x1080 pixlar och en uppdateringsfrekvens på 360 Hz. Alternativt finns en QHD 240 Hz- och en 4K 144 Hz-skärm, som alla ska täcka DCI-P3-färgrymden. QHD-modellen har även stöd för Nvidia G-Sync och Advanced Optimus.

Ljusstyrkan på 315 cd/m² i genomsnitt är mer än tillräcklig för de flesta tillämpningsscenarier och tillsammans med ett hyfsat svartvärde på 0,24 resulterar det i en kontrast på 1 375:1 över genomsnittet i klassjämförelsen. Svarstiderna från grått till grått är särskilt korta och vi kunde inte upptäcka någon PWM.

311
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
324
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
TL156VDXP02-0
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 330 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 314.7 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 330 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1375:1 (Svärta: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.47 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 0.63
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
67.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.282
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Razer Blade 15 2022
Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
BOE0A67 (BOE CQ NE156QHM-NZ1), IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Sharp LQ156T1JW04 (SHP153C), IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.60
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
BOE NE156FHM-NZ3, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
33%
31%
31%
10%
Display P3 Coverage
65.3
99.1
52%
97.6
49%
96.4
48%
70.1
7%
sRGB Coverage
85.1
99.9
17%
99.9
17%
99.7
17%
99.5
17%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
67.4
86.8
29%
85.3
27%
85.6
27%
72.1
7%
Response Times
-123%
-119%
-122%
-10%
-13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
4.3 ?(2.4, 1.9)
14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6)
-235%
14.4 ?(6.6, 7.8)
-235%
14 ?(7.2, 6.8)
-226%
6 ?(3.2, 2.8)
-40%
5.8 ?(3.4, 2.4)
-35%
Response Time Black / White *
10.5 ?(5.7, 4.8)
11.6 ?(5.6, 6)
-10%
10.8 ?(5.4, 5.4)
-3%
12.4 ?(7.2, 5.2)
-18%
8.4 ?(4.4, 4)
20%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
9%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-54%
-38%
-77%
-87%
-45%
Brightness middle
330
286
-13%
295
-11%
304.3
-8%
272
-18%
353.1
7%
Brightness
315
271
-14%
277
-12%
286
-9%
253
-20%
325
3%
Brightness Distribution
89
89
0%
62
-30%
76
-15%
87
-2%
85
-4%
Black Level *
0.24
0.25
-4%
0.28
-17%
0.33
-38%
0.25
-4%
0.38
-58%
Contrast
1375
1144
-17%
1054
-23%
922
-33%
1088
-21%
929
-32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.47
2.74
-86%
2.36
-61%
2.76
-88%
3.73
-154%
2.24
-52%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.73
5.21
-91%
4.24
-55%
5.57
-104%
9.43
-245%
5
-83%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.63
2.52
-300%
2.38
-278%
0.98
-56%
1.02
-62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
1.1
39%
3.43
-91%
4
-122%
6.5
-261%
4
-122%
Gamma
2.282 96%
2.2 100%
2.44 90%
2.14 103%
2.172 101%
2.24 98%
CCT
6499 100%
6408 101%
6266 104%
6844 95%
6485 100%
6864 95%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-48% / -45%
-79% / -54%
-56% / -60%
-22% / -51%
-16% / -28%

* ... smaller is better

I vår konfiguration täcker Razer Blade 15 endast 85 % av sRGB-färgrymden. Med tanke på tillverkarens påstående om "upp till 100 %" förväntade vi oss mer här.

CalMAN: Gråskala
CalMAN: Gråskala
CalMAN: Färgmättnad
CalMAN: Färgmättnad
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Gråskala (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: Gråskala (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: Färgmättnad (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: Färgmättnad (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrerad)

Vid leverans ligger DeltaE-avvikelserna i färgrymden för gråskalor och färger redan i det ideala intervallet (mindre än 3) och kan förbättras till 0,63 respektive 0,8 genom efterföljande kalibrering

Razer Blade 15 vs sRGB
Razer Blade 15 vs sRGB
Razer Blade 15 vs AdobeRGB
Razer Blade 15 vs AdobeRGB
Razer Blade 15 vs P3
Razer Blade 15 vs P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.7 ms rise
↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 1.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21941 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Tack vare en ljusstyrka på över 300 cd/m² är skärmen även lämpad för utomhusbruk så länge du håller dig i skuggan

Användning utomhus
Användning utomhus
Betraktningsvinkel
Betraktningsvinkel

Visningsvinklarna är utmärkta. Även vid branta vinklar förvrängs knappt färgerna och kontrasterna på IPS-displayen

Prestanda - Razer gaming laptop med bästa hårdvara

Vår Razer Blade 15 är utrustad med en Intel Core i7-12800H och en Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. Det finns också 32 GB DDR5 RAM i fyrkanalsläge och en 1 TB PCIe 4.0 SSD. I kombination med 4K-panelen finns den bärbara datorn alternativt tillgänglig med Core i9-12900H.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z - Huvudkort
CPU-Z - Minne
CPU-Z - SPD
GPU-Z - Intel
GPU-Z - Nvidia
HWiNFO
 

Testvillkor

För att få nya insikter under testningen utförde vi alla mätningar med Synapse-profilen "Balanced". Detta gör att GPU:n arbetar med en maximal TGP på cirka 95 W och begränsar även CPU:n. Du kan hitta de maximalt uppnåeliga poängen i vår annan granskning.

Processor

Intel Core i7-12800H är en helt ny 12:e generationens Intel-processor med stöd för DDR5 RAM-minne. DDR5-funktionen gör det möjligt för de två RAM-modulerna att fungera i fyrkanalsläge.

Razer Blade 15 har sämre förutsättningar att hålla jämna steg med konkurrenterna när det gäller CPU-prestanda i läget "Balanserad" än utan prestandabegränsningar. Även den nominellt svagare Core i7-12700H i XMG Neo 15 E22 slår vår recensionsenhet i båda scenarierna i Cinebench R15 flerspråkigt test. Att vissa benchmarks med en enda tråd blir bättre beror förmodligen på att temperaturgränserna nås före TDP-gränserna. Turbo Boost är bara aktiv under en kort tid.

Cinebench R15 multi-thread-testet ger samma poäng i batteriläge med den profil vi valde.

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø1535 (1448.91-1565.5)
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2081 (2061.43-2178.41)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2766 (2740.48-2824.46)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2175 (2157.5-2197.2)
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2624 (2577.65-2843.74)
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2372 (2349.62-2449.33)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
82.4 pt ∼82%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
80.8 pt ∼81%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
80.7 pt ∼81%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
72.3 pt ∼72%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
 
70.8 pt ∼71%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS -2!
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
62.7 pt ∼63%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
61.4 pt ∼61%
Average of class Gaming
 
55.7 pt ∼56%
Cinebench R23
CPU (Multi Core)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
18452 Points ∼100% +89%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
17940 Points ∼97% +83%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
16812 (15129.6min - 16812.1max) Points ∼91% +72%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
14893 (13078min - 14893.1max) Points ∼81% +52%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (9777 - 15386, n=4)
13835 Points ∼75% +42%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
13519 (13222.6min - 13519.5max) Points ∼73% +38%
Average of class Gaming
  (4032 - 19282, n=156, last 2 years)
12076 Points ∼65% +24%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
9777 Points ∼53%
CPU (Single Core)
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
1887 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (1796 - 1839, n=4)
1816 Points ∼96% +1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
1803 Points ∼96% 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1799 Points ∼95%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1796 Points ∼95% 0%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1782 Points ∼94% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (778 - 1920, n=155, last 2 years)
1473 Points ∼78% -18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1469 Points ∼78% -18%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
6988 Points ∼100% +87%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
6651 Points ∼95% +78%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
6594 Points ∼94% +76%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5731 Points ∼82% +53%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5214 Points ∼75% +39%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (3741 - 5928, n=4)
5196 Points ∼74% +39%
Average of class Gaming
  (1397 - 7382, n=228, last 2 years)
4285 Points ∼61% +15%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
3741 Points ∼54%
CPU (Single Core)
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
730 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (690 - 708, n=4)
700 Points ∼96% +1%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
696 Points ∼95% 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
695 Points ∼95%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
693 Points ∼95% 0%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
690 Points ∼95% -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
574 Points ∼79% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (300 - 740, n=228, last 2 years)
543 Points ∼74% -22%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
2844 (2577.65min - 2843.74max) Points ∼100% +82%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
2824 (2740.48min - 2824.46max) Points ∼99% +80%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
2449 (2349.62min - 2449.33max) Points ∼86% +56%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2197 (2157.5min - 2197.2max) Points ∼77% +40%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
2178 (2061.43min - 2178.41max) Points ∼77% +39%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (1566 - 2697, n=4)
2166 Points ∼76% +38%
Average of class Gaming
  (536 - 2944, n=239, last 2 years)
1797 Points ∼63% +15%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1566 (1448.91min - 1565.5max) Points ∼55%
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
273 Points ∼100% +13%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
261 Points ∼96% +8%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
260 Points ∼95% +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
258 Points ∼95% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (242 - 266, n=4)
258 Points ∼95% +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
242 Points ∼89%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
234 Points ∼86% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (108 - 277, n=229, last 2 years)
217 Points ∼79% -10%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
306 Seconds * ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (168 - 732, n=227, last 2 years)
295 Seconds * ∼96% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (220 - 306, n=4)
244 Seconds * ∼80% +20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
240 Seconds * ∼78% +22%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
226 Seconds * ∼74% +26%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
197 Seconds * ∼64% +36%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
187 Seconds * ∼61% +39%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
177 Seconds * ∼58% +42%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
73067 MIPS ∼100% +64%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
69454 MIPS ∼95% +56%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
66678 MIPS ∼91% +50%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
61936 MIPS ∼85% +39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
61422 MIPS ∼84% +38%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (44553 - 62231, n=4)
57705 MIPS ∼79% +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (21148 - 76063, n=227, last 2 years)
48679 MIPS ∼67% +9%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
44553 MIPS ∼61%
7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
6071 MIPS ∼100% +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5892 MIPS ∼97%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
5804 MIPS ∼96% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (5726 - 5892, n=4)
5800 MIPS ∼96% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
5775 MIPS ∼95% -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5726 MIPS ∼94% -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5568 MIPS ∼92% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2743 - 6506, n=227, last 2 years)
5366 MIPS ∼88% -9%
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
13745 Points ∼100% +43%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
13033 Points ∼95% +36%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
12434 Points ∼90% +29%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
12382 Points ∼90% +29%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (9607 - 12797, n=4)
11712 Points ∼85% +22%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
9607 Points ∼70%
Average of class Gaming
  (2783 - 14294, n=220, last 2 years)
8182 Points ∼60% -15%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
1883 Points ∼100% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1842 Points ∼98%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1784 Points ∼95% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (1739 - 1842, n=4)
1778 Points ∼94% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1758 Points ∼93% -5%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
1718 Points ∼91% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (703 - 1933, n=220, last 2 years)
1423 Points ∼76% -23%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
20.9 fps ∼100% +79%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
19.8 fps ∼95% +69%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
19.6 fps ∼94% +68%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
17.2 fps ∼82% +47%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.6 fps ∼75% +33%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (11.7 - 17.2, n=4)
15.5 fps ∼74% +32%
Average of class Gaming
  (4.67 - 22, n=226, last 2 years)
13.5 fps ∼65% +15%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
11.7 fps ∼56%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 113, n=224, last 2 years)
52.8 s * ∼100% -23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
52.3 s * ∼99% -22%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
51.5 s * ∼98% -20%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (41.3 - 51.5, n=4)
45.5 s * ∼86% -6%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
42.9 s * ∼81% -0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
42.9 s * ∼81%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
40.3 s * ∼76% +6%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
40.3 s * ∼76% +6%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.412 - 1.088, n=223, last 2 years)
0.555 sec * ∼100% -23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4908 sec * ∼88% -9%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.4715 sec * ∼85% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (0.4522 - 0.4715, n=4)
0.4593 sec * ∼83% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4553 sec * ∼82% -1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.4522 sec * ∼81%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.448 sec * ∼81% +1%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4218 sec * ∼76% +7%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1566 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
198 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
242 Points
Hjälp
Performance Rating
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
93.1 pt ∼93%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
73.6 pt ∼74%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
73.5 pt ∼74%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
69.2 pt ∼69%
Average of class Gaming
 
68.9 pt ∼69%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
63.6 pt ∼64%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
 
60.9 pt ∼61%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53.5 pt ∼54%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
15150 KRay/s ∼100% +159%
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 19199, n=181, last 2 years)
11526 KRay/s ∼76% +97%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9537 KRay/s ∼63% +63%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9023 KRay/s ∼60% +55%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8506 KRay/s ∼56% +46%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
7671 KRay/s ∼51% +31%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (5839 - 7694, n=4)
7165 KRay/s ∼47% +23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5839 KRay/s ∼39%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
100744 Points ∼100% +262%
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 110797, n=181, last 2 years)
62647 Points ∼62% +125%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
41732 Points ∼41% +50%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
41116 Points ∼41% +48%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
38603 Points ∼38% +39%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
36695 Points ∼36% +32%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (27801 - 37471, n=4)
34542 Points ∼34% +24%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
27801 Points ∼28%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
3412 MB/s ∼100% +69%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3343 MB/s ∼98% +66%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3192 MB/s ∼94% +59%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3031 MB/s ∼89% +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (833 - 4851, n=181, last 2 years)
2807 MB/s ∼82% +39%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2681 MB/s ∼79% +33%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (2013 - 2693, n=4)
2515 MB/s ∼74% +25%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2013 MB/s ∼59%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
106194 Points ∼100% +24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
102329 Points ∼96% +19%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
97910 Points ∼92% +14%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
97871 Points ∼92% +14%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (85965 - 101957, n=4)
93912 Points ∼88% +9%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
93492 Points ∼88% +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (30447 - 132615, n=181, last 2 years)
88814 Points ∼84% +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
85965 Points ∼81%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
12610 Points ∼100% +79%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9928 Points ∼79% +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (3007 - 17639, n=181, last 2 years)
9926 Points ∼79% +41%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9899 Points ∼79% +41%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9756 Points ∼77% +39%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9205 Points ∼73% +31%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (7027 - 9271, n=4)
8635 Points ∼68% +23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
7027 Points ∼56%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
55702 Points ∼100% +253%
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 61370, n=181, last 2 years)
33829 Points ∼61% +115%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
26824 Points ∼48% +70%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
24769 Points ∼44% +57%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
23055 Points ∼41% +46%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
21312 Points ∼38% +35%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (15765 - 21600, n=4)
20022 Points ∼36% +27%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
15765 Points ∼28%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
132655 MB/s ∼100% +101%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99638 MB/s ∼75% +51%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
96687 MB/s ∼73% +47%
Average of class Gaming
  (11368 - 156370, n=181, last 2 years)
74779 MB/s ∼56% +14%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
67282 MB/s ∼51% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65871 MB/s ∼50%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (55371 - 65871, n=4)
58347 MB/s ∼44% -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55775 MB/s ∼42% -15%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1156 MB/s ∼100% +65%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1081 MB/s ∼94% +54%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1069 MB/s ∼92% +52%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
928 MB/s ∼80% +32%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (701 - 1034, n=4)
896 MB/s ∼78% +28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
841 MB/s ∼73% +20%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
701 MB/s ∼61%
Average of class Gaming
  (305 - 1209, n=202, last 2 years)
670 MB/s ∼58% -4%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
8644 KRay/s ∼100% +165%
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 10472, n=181, last 2 years)
6244 KRay/s ∼72% +92%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5597 KRay/s ∼65% +72%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
5237 KRay/s ∼61% +61%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
4883 KRay/s ∼56% +50%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4173 KRay/s ∼48% +28%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (3257 - 4287, n=4)
3991 KRay/s ∼46% +23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3257 KRay/s ∼38%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40992 MPixel/s ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40524 MPixel/s ∼99% +2%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
39921 MPixel/s ∼97% +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
39666 MPixel/s ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (31329 - 40992, n=4)
38220 MPixel/s ∼93% -4%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
27416 MPixel/s ∼67% -31%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
25533 MPixel/s ∼62% -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (8341 - 46643, n=181, last 2 years)
24087 MPixel/s ∼59% -39%

Systemets prestanda

Systemprestandan är solid, enligt PCMark 10-testerna. Vid daglig användning är driftshastigheten jämn och det finns inga märkbara fördröjningar, vilket är anledningen till att du kan använda läget "Balanserad" utan att behöva oroa dig.

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
8004 Points ∼100% +9%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7706 Points ∼96% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7313 - 7744, n=3)
7588 Points ∼95% +4%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7582 Points ∼95% +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7313 Points ∼91%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
7240 Points ∼90% -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
7201 Points ∼90% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (4077 - 8186, n=192, last 2 years)
6417 Points ∼80% -12%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
10943 Points ∼100% +3%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10847 Points ∼99% +2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10708 Points ∼98% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10597 - 10814, n=3)
10706 Points ∼98% +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10597 Points ∼97%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
10218 Points ∼93% -4%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
10070 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (7148 - 11205, n=191, last 2 years)
9803 Points ∼90% -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
10141 Points ∼100% +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
10066 Points ∼99% +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9675 Points ∼95%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9581 Points ∼94% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9470 - 9675, n=3)
9575 Points ∼94% -1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9495 Points ∼94% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
8944 Points ∼88% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (6161 - 10638, n=191, last 2 years)
8618 Points ∼85% -11%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
12541 Points ∼100% +21%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
12104 Points ∼97% +17%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10351 - 12306, n=3)
11587 Points ∼92% +12%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
11488 Points ∼92% +11%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
11434 Points ∼91% +10%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10351 Points ∼83%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
9852 Points ∼79% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (3670 - 13098, n=191, last 2 years)
8622 Points ∼69% -17%
CrossMark / Overall
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1768 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
1768 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (974 - 2108, n=24, last 2 years)
1714 Points ∼97% -3%
CrossMark / Productivity
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1719 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
1719 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (907 - 2062, n=24, last 2 years)
1670 Points ∼97% -3%
CrossMark / Creativity
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1868 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
1868 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (1027 - 2165, n=24, last 2 years)
1784 Points ∼96% -4%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 2230, n=24, last 2 years)
1658 Points ∼100% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1633 Points ∼98%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
1633 Points ∼98% 0%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
6657 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
7009 poäng
PCMark 10 Score
7313 poäng
Hjälp
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65103 MB/s ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62522 MB/s ∼96% +1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61994 MB/s ∼95% 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
61946 MB/s ∼95%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (48643 - 62522, n=4)
58859 MB/s ∼90% -5%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
45395 MB/s ∼70% -27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
43318 MB/s ∼67% -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (18074 - 77803, n=181, last 2 years)
41963 MB/s ∼64% -32%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66265 MB/s ∼100% +2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65933 MB/s ∼99% +1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
65341 MB/s ∼99% 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65277 MB/s ∼99%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (56629 - 66199, n=4)
63510 MB/s ∼96% -3%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
49035 MB/s ∼74% -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
45841 MB/s ∼69% -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (20318 - 76185, n=181, last 2 years)
45785 MB/s ∼69% -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66256 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66074 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65772 MB/s ∼99%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65495 MB/s ∼99% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (50923 - 66074, n=4)
62190 MB/s ∼94% -5%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
46932 MB/s ∼71% -29%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
46062 MB/s ∼70% -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (15975 - 66256, n=181, last 2 years)
44180 MB/s ∼67% -33%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
95.2 ns * ∼100%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
94.7 ns * ∼99% +1%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
90.6 ns * ∼95% +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
85.3 ns * ∼90% +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (68.8 - 122, n=203, last 2 years)
62.4 ns * ∼66% +34%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (95.2 - 95.2, n=4)
23.8 (95.2min - 95.2max) ns * ∼25% +75%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0% +100%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0% +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-latenstider

Enligt LatencyMon kan DPC-returtiderna vara för höga för ljud- och videoredigering i realtid i den konfiguration vi testade

LatencyMon
LatencyMon drivrutiner
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4836 μs * ∼100%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
3882 μs * ∼80% +20%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
2156 μs * ∼45% +55%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1380 μs * ∼29% +71%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1364 μs * ∼28% +72%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
808 μs * ∼17% +83%

* ... smaller is better

Lagringsenheter

En 1 TB Samsung PM9A1 M.2 SDD med PCIe 4.0 är installerad i vår recensionsenhet, vilket resulterar i mycket höga dataöverföringshastigheter. Eftersom PCIe 4.0 SSD "CA6-8D1024" från SSSTC installerades i vår första Blade 15-prövningsenhetenkan enhetsmodellerna och överföringshastigheterna skilja sig åt.

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7096.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5251.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 863.75 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 631.75 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4212.51 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3980.96 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 92.87 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 242.96 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
87.1 pt ∼87%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS -8!
WDC PC SN810 1TB
87.1 pt ∼87%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
84.6 pt ∼85%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
 
83.8 pt ∼84%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
72 pt ∼72%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
68.1 pt ∼68%
Average of class Gaming
 
53.4 pt ∼53%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
24.8 pt ∼25%
DiskSpd
seq read
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4119 (4098.66min - 4118.81max) MB/s ∼100% +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3946 (3883.92min - 3946.42max) MB/s ∼96%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2514 - 4608, n=19)
3871 MB/s ∼94% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
3225 (3206.01min - 3225.21max) MB/s ∼78% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (170 - 4931, n=190, last 2 years)
2259 MB/s ∼55% -43%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
2119 (2058.22min - 2119.13max) MB/s ∼51% -46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1160 (560.08min - 1160.14max) MB/s ∼28% -71%
seq write
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4167 (4120.63min - 4166.62max) MB/s ∼100% +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3899 (3880.57min - 3898.61max) MB/s ∼94%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2436 - 4368, n=19)
3752 MB/s ∼90% -4%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3405 (3386.69min - 3404.63max) MB/s ∼82% -13%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2661 (2641.11min - 2661max) MB/s ∼64% -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (174 - 7889, n=189, last 2 years)
2424 MB/s ∼58% -38%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1156 (590.64min - 1155.74max) MB/s ∼28% -70%
seq q8 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6921 (6631.14min - 6921.02max) MB/s ∼100% +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6666 (5850.89min - 6666.43max) MB/s ∼96%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (3421 - 6688, n=19)
6259 MB/s ∼90% -6%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
4536 (4257.18min - 4536.14max) MB/s ∼66% -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 13195, n=190, last 2 years)
3665 MB/s ∼53% -45%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3563 (3099.47min - 3563.48max) MB/s ∼51% -47%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1741 (791.56min - 1740.72max) MB/s ∼25% -74%
seq q8 t1 write
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4939 (4931.24min - 4938.77max) MB/s ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4740 (4542.15min - 4740.19max) MB/s ∼96% -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2877 - 4999, n=19)
4733 MB/s ∼96% -4%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3448 (3378.51min - 3448.14max) MB/s ∼70% -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (86.2 - 9830, n=190, last 2 years)
2902 MB/s ∼59% -41%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2665 (2644.09min - 2664.64max) MB/s ∼54% -46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1185 (657.19min - 1184.83max) MB/s ∼24% -76%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
90.6 (86.51min - 90.63max) MB/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
89.7 (89.47min - 89.72max) MB/s ∼99% -1%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (58.6 - 97.4, n=19)
82.4 MB/s ∼91% -9%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
79.6 (78.85min - 79.63max) MB/s ∼88% -12%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
69.5 (66.71min - 69.49max) MB/s ∼77% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.53 - 97.4, n=190, last 2 years)
54.6 MB/s ∼60% -40%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
23.3 (23.23min - 23.32max) MB/s ∼26% -74%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
408 (406.25min - 408.46max) MB/s ∼100% +62%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
256 (23.49min - 256.28max) MB/s ∼63% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
252 (240.11min - 252.24max) MB/s ∼62%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
223 (222.49min - 223.25max) MB/s ∼55% -12%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (161 - 274, n=19)
213 MB/s ∼52% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.79 - 421, n=189, last 2 years)
166.2 MB/s ∼41% -34%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
138 (137.2min - 137.78max) MB/s ∼34% -45%
4k q32 t16 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1129 - 4185, n=19)
3533 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3493 (3465.14min - 3493.06max) MB/s ∼99%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3184 (3180.75min - 3183.86max) MB/s ∼90% -9%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2272 (2266.88min - 2271.97max) MB/s ∼64% -35%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
1844 (1840.41min - 1844.18max) MB/s ∼52% -47%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.1 - 4198, n=189, last 2 years)
1704 MB/s ∼48% -51%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
439 (211.56min - 439max) MB/s ∼12% -87%
4k q32 t16 write
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3354 (3320.28min - 3353.86max) MB/s ∼100% +27%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (373 - 3559, n=19)
2703 MB/s ∼81% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2645 (2612.9min - 2645.36max) MB/s ∼79%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2613 (2594.87min - 2613.35max) MB/s ∼78% -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2141 (2137.08min - 2141.26max) MB/s ∼64% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.15 - 4249, n=189, last 2 years)
1711 MB/s ∼51% -35%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
618 (524.5min - 618max) MB/s ∼18% -77%
AS SSD
Score Total
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
8556 Points ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8103 Points ∼95%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (4873 - 9147, n=19)
7886 Points ∼92% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7659 Points ∼90% -5%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
6267 Points ∼73% -23%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
6130 Points ∼72% -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (910 - 9279, n=183, last 2 years)
5008 Points ∼59% -38%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1814 Points ∼21% -78%
Score Read
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3482 Points ∼100% +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3431 Points ∼99% +12%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3054 Points ∼88%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1688 - 3439, n=19)
2991 Points ∼86% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2462 Points ∼71% -19%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
2008 Points ∼58% -34%
Average of class Gaming
  (389 - 3587, n=183, last 2 years)
1868 Points ∼54% -39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
637 Points ∼18% -79%
Score Write
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3545 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1230 - 4043, n=19)
3430 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3325 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3087 Points ∼87% -13%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2661 Points ∼75% -25%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2563 Points ∼72% -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (335 - 4414, n=183, last 2 years)
2202 Points ∼62% -38%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
882 Points ∼25% -75%
Seq Read
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
5750 MB/s ∼100% +10%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5450 MB/s ∼95% +5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5205 MB/s ∼91%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
5022 MB/s ∼87% -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2834 - 5482, n=19)
4822 MB/s ∼84% -7%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3080 MB/s ∼54% -41%
Average of class Gaming
  (252 - 6562, n=183, last 2 years)
3017 MB/s ∼52% -42%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1757 MB/s ∼31% -66%
Seq Write
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4795 MB/s ∼100% +22%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4073 MB/s ∼85% +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3936 MB/s ∼82%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1625 - 4007, n=19)
3470 MB/s ∼72% -12%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
2997 MB/s ∼63% -24%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2466 MB/s ∼51% -37%
Average of class Gaming
  (308 - 7663, n=183, last 2 years)
2368 MB/s ∼49% -40%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1071 MB/s ∼22% -73%
4K Read
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
81.9 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.55 MB/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
80.4 MB/s ∼98% -1%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (50.6 - 88.1, n=19)
74.5 MB/s ∼91% -9%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
70 MB/s ∼85% -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
67.2 MB/s ∼82% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (20 - 108, n=183, last 2 years)
54.1 MB/s ∼66% -34%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
22.07 MB/s ∼27% -73%
4K Write
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
352 MB/s ∼100% +75%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
302.8 MB/s ∼86% +51%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
221.3 MB/s ∼63% +10%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
201.1 MB/s ∼57%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
193.7 MB/s ∼55% -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (148.7 - 240, n=19)
190.1 MB/s ∼54% -5%