Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Razer Blade Pro 17 2020 - Behöver du verkligen en laptop med 300 Hz? (Sammanfattning)

Snabb skärm på en snabb laptop. Detta är första gången en spellaptop på 17.3 tum erbjuder bilduppdatering som är snabbare än 240 Hz. Men om du inte är en superentusiast är det svårt att se skillnad på 300 Hz och förra årets 240 Hz-skärm.
Comet Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz (Blade Pro 17 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1420 MHz, Minne: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, 442.53, Manual
Minne
16 GB 
, Samsung DDR4-3200, 21-21-21-47, Dubbla kanaler, 2x SODIMM
Skärm
17.30 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 127 PPI, Sharp LQ173M1JW02, IPS, SHP14D8, glansig: nej, 300 Hz
Moderkort
Intel HM470
Hårddisk
Lite-On CA5-8D512, 512 GB 
Ljudkort
Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller
Anslutningar
5 USB 3.0, 5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 5 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Kombinerad 3.5 mm, Kortläsare: SD-kortläsare (UHS-III)
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 19.9 x 395 x 260
Batteri
70 Wh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Razer Synapse, 12 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.718 kg, Strömförsörjning: 784 g
Pris
2600 USD
Länkar
Razer hemsida
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.4 %
06/2020
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		2.7 kg19.9 mm17.30"1920x1080
81.2 %
12/2019
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		2.7 kg18.7 mm17.30"1920x1080
82.9 %
07/2019
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		2.3 kg18.9 mm17.30"1920x1080
84.2 %
03/2020
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		2.6 kg20.5 mm17.30"1920x1080
86.5 %
06/2020
Aorus 17G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		2.7 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080
❌
405 mm 276 mm 26 mm 2.7 kg399.8 mm 295.5 mm 20.5 mm 2.6 kg399 mm 272 mm 18.7 mm 2.7 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.7 kg396 mm 259 mm 18.9 mm 2.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 17G XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
212 MB/s +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
208.5 MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198.5 MB/s -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
181.3 MB/s -13%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
181 MB/s -13%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus 17G XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
247 MB/s +19%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
208.3 MB/s
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
204 MB/s -2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198 MB/s -5%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
197.9 MB/s -5%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1283 (1089min - 1413max) MBit/s
Aorus 17G XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1260 MBit/s -2%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
880 MBit/s -31%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
623 (577min - 656max) MBit/s -51%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
496 (459min - 531max) MBit/s -61%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1520 MBit/s +29%
Aorus 17G XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1260 MBit/s +7%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1182 (1085min - 1338max) MBit/s
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
638 (625min - 645max) MBit/s -46%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
634 (621min - 646max) MBit/s -46%
07515022530037545052560067575082590097510501125120012751350Tooltip
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1182 (1085-1338)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1283 (1089-1413)
ColorChecker
4.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
7 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8 ∆E
ColorChecker Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz: 8.71 ∆E min: 1.66 - max: 21.72 ∆E
368.4
cd/m²		356.9
cd/m²		367
cd/m²
323.2
cd/m²		328
cd/m²		332
cd/m²
287.1
cd/m²		293.1
cd/m²		308.3
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
Sharp LQ173M1JW02 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 368.4 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 329.3 cd/m² Minimum: 16.4 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 78 %
Mitt på batteriet: 328 cd/m²
Kontrast: 937:1 (Svärta: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.12
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
73% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Sharp LQ173M1JW02, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080		Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
AU Optronics B173HAN05.1, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080		MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080		Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Chi Mei 173HCE, CMN175F, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080		Aorus 17G XB
AU Optronics B173HAN05.0 (AUO509D), IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080		Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
AU Optronics B173ZAN03.3, IPS, 17.30, 3840x2160
Display
-2%
-10%
-1%
-1%
18%
Display P3 Coverage
72.2
70
-3%
62.6
-13%
70.8
-2%
70.6
-2%
84.8
17%
sRGB Coverage
98.5
96.6
-2%
93.5
-5%
98.5
0%
97.2
-1%
99.9
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
73
72.3
-1%
64.7
-11%
72.2
-1%
72.8
0%
98.6
35%
Response Times
11%
-17%
-110%
-106%
-90%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
5.6 ?(2.6, 3)
5.6 ?(2.4, 3.2)
-0%
7.2 ?(3.8, 3.4)
-29%
17.2 ?(8.8, 8.4)
-207%
16 ?(7.6, 8.4)
-186%
15.2 ?(8.4, 6.8)
-171%
Response Time Black / White *
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2)
21%
10 ?(5.2, 4.8)
-4%
10.8 ?(6, 4.8)
-13%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
-25%
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
-8%
PWM Frequency
25510 ?(17)
26320 ?(25)
Screen
23%
31%
32%
31%
3%
Brightness middle
328
288
-12%
366
12%
384.2
17%
293
-11%
346.7
6%
Brightness
329
276
-16%
343
4%
357
9%
285
-13%
332
1%
Brightness Distribution
78
93
19%
91
17%
90
15%
95
22%
91
17%
Black Level *
0.35
0.24
31%
0.29
17%
0.29
17%
0.24
31%
0.27
23%
Contrast
937
1200
28%
1262
35%
1325
41%
1221
30%
1284
37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.74
1.92
59%
1.51
68%
1.35
72%
1.27
73%
5.62
-19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.99
4.57
49%
3.22
64%
3.45
62%
2.24
75%
9.36
-4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.12
1.14
46%
0.71
67%
1.42
33%
1.06
50%
3.81
-80%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.8
3.08
55%
1.93
72%
1.2
82%
1.34
80%
5.5
19%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.42 91%
2.38 92%
2.23 99%
2.38 92%
2.25 98%
CCT
6446 101%
7055 92%
6881 94%
6580 99%
6542 99%
6175 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
64.8
65
0%
60
-7%
65.5
1%
73
13%
87.2
35%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98.6
96
-3%
94
-5%
98.5
0%
94
-5%
100
1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
11% / 17%
1% / 18%
-26% / 8%
-25% / 8%
-23% / -6%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.6 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

 
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1362 (1352.68-1494.38)
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1773 (1724.58-1815.79)
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1640 (1625.22-1699.96)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1572 (1548.11-1671.4)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4288 Points +27%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
4136 Points +23%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4132 Points +23%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3843 Points +14%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
3712 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1986 - 4176, n=32)
3455 Points +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
3367 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3224 Points -4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
2888 Points -14%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H
2328 Points -31%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
1906 Points -43%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
495 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (430 - 524, n=32)
486 Points +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
483 Points
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
478 Points -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
478 Points -1%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
477 Points -1%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
476 Points -1%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
441 Points -9%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
437 Points -10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H
431 Points -11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
428 Points -11%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
1863 Points +20%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1816 (1724.58min - 1815.79max) Points +17%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1754 Points +13%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points +11%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1708 (1581.15min - 1708.45max) Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1003 - 1833, n=38)
1554 Points 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
1549 (1352.68min - 1494.38max) Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1398 (1313.46min - 1397.77max) Points -10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
1308 Points -16%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H
1094 Points -29%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
839 (755.39min - 839.42max) Points -46%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
206 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (190 - 220, n=37)
204 Points +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
200 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
195.8 Points -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
Intel Core i9-9980HK
195 Points -2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
193 Points -3%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points -5%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
189 Points -5%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
180 Points -10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
178 Points -11%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points -12%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
555 Seconds * -71%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
379.1 Seconds * -17%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
345 Seconds * -6%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (259 - 535, n=30)
327 Seconds * -1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
324 Seconds *
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
297 Seconds * +8%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
293 Seconds * +10%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
278 Seconds * +14%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
271 Seconds * +16%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5463 MIPS +4%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (5071 - 5780, n=31)
5360 MIPS +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
5245 MIPS
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
5086 MIPS -3%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
4924 MIPS -6%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4717 MIPS -10%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
4662 MIPS -11%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4634 MIPS -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4471 MIPS -15%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
48837 MIPS +45%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
48577 MIPS +44%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
46976 MIPS +40%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
46591 MIPS +38%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (29844 - 49562, n=31)
43117 MIPS +28%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
36693 MIPS +9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
33674 MIPS
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
32386 MIPS -4%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
22139 MIPS -34%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1352 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1233 - 1371, n=29)
1304 Points +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
1278 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
1227 Points -4%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
1218 Points -5%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1189 Points -7%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
1143 Points -11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1108 Points -13%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8104 Points +8%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
7782 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (5715 - 8620, n=29)
7734 Points +3%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
7675 Points +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
7531 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
6317 Points -16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
5260 Points -30%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
4032 Points -46%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
13 fps
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
12.2 fps
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
12.19 fps
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
11.86 fps
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (7.27 - 14.1, n=27)
11.7 fps
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
9.41 fps
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
9.27 fps
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
6.34 fps
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
64.1 s * -11%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
61.4 s * -6%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
58.9 s * -2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H
57.8 s *
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
53.4 s * +8%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (30.2 - 84.3, n=30)
50.3 s * +13%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
50.2 s * +13%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.676 sec *
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.626 sec *
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
0.626 sec *
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.596 sec *
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (0.546 - 0.662, n=29)
0.582 sec *
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.564 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1549 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
166 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
200 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Score
Aorus 17G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6571 Points +4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
6290 Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6202 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6049 Points -4%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
5804 Points -8%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
5502 Points -13%
Essentials
Aorus 17G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
10239 Points +4%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
9933 Points +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9927 Points +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
9831 Points
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
9501 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9405 Points -4%
Productivity
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
8253 Points +3%
Aorus 17G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8237 Points +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
8028 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7654 Points -5%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
7622 Points -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7357 Points -8%
Digital Content Creation
Aorus 17G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
9128 Points +7%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8862 Points +4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
8560 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8344 Points -3%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
7330 Points -14%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
5514 Points -36%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5319 Points +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
5217 Points
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
4461 Points -14%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
4384 Points -16%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4255 Points -18%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6593 Points +4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
6317 Points
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
5818 Points -8%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
5716 Points -10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4755 Points -25%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5217 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6317 poäng
PCMark 10 Score
6290 poäng
Hjälp
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
8852 μs * -759%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
2952 μs * -187%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
2841 μs * -176%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
1030 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Lite-On CA5-8D512		MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)		Alienware m17 R2 P41E
2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)		Aorus 17G XB
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ		Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
AS SSD
41%
26%
68%
54%
Seq Read
2019
2855
41%
1938
-4%
1791
-11%
1881
-7%
Seq Write
1314
2687
104%
2094
59%
2193
67%
2354
79%
4K Read
46.61
30.31
-35%
25.88
-44%
50.7
9%
43.42
-7%
4K Write
90.2
96.3
7%
100.8
12%
116.8
29%
104.1
15%
4K-64 Read
665
1460
120%
1217
83%
1525
129%
1805
171%
4K-64 Write
813
1224
51%
1137
40%
1958
141%
1775
118%
Access Time Read *
0.058
0.054
7%
0.051
12%
0.07
-21%
0.049
16%
Access Time Write *
0.167
0.038
77%
0.107
36%
0.032
81%
0.106
37%
Score Read
913
1776
95%
1437
57%
1755
92%
2037
123%
Score Write
1034
1589
54%
1447
40%
2294
122%
2115
105%
Score Total
2392
4259
78%
3624
52%
4972
108%
5215
118%
Copy ISO MB/s
1715
2226
30%
1926
12%
1877
9%
Copy Program MB/s
622
426.4
-31%
626
1%
539
-13%
Copy Game MB/s
1506
1152
-24%
1533
2%
1368
-9%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
4%
-3%
5%
-10%
Write 4K
119
95.5
-20%
110.6
-7%
123.4
4%
121.7
2%
Read 4K
51.9
42.59
-18%
41.46
-20%
45.02
-13%
43.81
-16%
Write Seq
2258
2851
26%
2378
5%
2526
12%
1276
-43%
Read Seq
2283
2696
18%
2114
-7%
2062
-10%
1183
-48%
Write 4K Q32T1
491
402.6
-18%
445.4
-9%
497.9
1%
527
7%
Read 4K Q32T1
540
443.9
-18%
509
-6%
579
7%
592
10%
Write Seq Q32T1
2253
3420
52%
2735
21%
2982
32%
2379
6%
Read Seq Q32T1
3172
3514
11%
3206
1%
3440
8%
3213
1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
23% / 28%
12% / 15%
37% / 41%
22% / 31%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Lite-On CA5-8D512
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3172 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2253 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 540 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 491 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2283 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2258 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 51.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 119 MB/s

Diskstrypning: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
25497 Points +20%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
23032 Points +9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
21191 Points
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
21004 Points -1%
MSI GS66 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
20117 Points -5%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
19338 Points -9%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
19230 Points -9%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
18807 Points -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (11563 - 21191, n=31)
17489 Points -17%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
14753 Points -30%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
12038 Points -43%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H
9621 Points -55%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
9854 Points +22%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
8844 Points +10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
8065 Points
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
7732 Points -4%
MSI GS66 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
7618 Points -6%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
7358 Points -9%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
7294 Points -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (5948 - 8065, n=28)
6745 Points -16%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
6312 Points -22%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5335 Points -34%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
3749 Points -54%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H
3461 Points -57%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
10012 Points +22%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
8460 Points +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
8236 Points
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
7878 Points -4%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
7633 Points -7%
MSI GS66 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
7475 Points -9%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
7261 Points -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (5989 - 8236, n=28)
6746 Points -18%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
6610 Points -20%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5406 Points -34%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
3751 Points -54%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H
3554 Points -57%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
34846 Points +26%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
30910 Points +12%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
27955 Points +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
27694 Points
MSI GS66 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
26855 Points -3%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
26413 Points -5%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
25706 Points -7%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
24465 Points -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (14723 - 27694, n=31)
22548 Points -19%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
19329 Points -30%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
15145 Points -45%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H
13168 Points -52%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS
18934 Points +22%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
16266 Points +5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
15564 Points
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13742 Points -12%
MSI GS66 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
13592 Points -13%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
13126 Points -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (9107 - 17603, n=30)
12665 Points -19%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
12170 Points -22%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
11416 Points -27%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
10270 Points -34%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H
8969 Points -42%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
7358 Points -53%
3DMark 11 Performance
23306 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
48701 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18543 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
8236 poäng
Hjälp
The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Aorus 17 YA
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
95.4 (80min) fps +18%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
85.1 (71min) fps +5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
81 (72min - 91max) fps 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
80.9 (75min - 90max) fps
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
74.3 fps -8%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
73.6 (62min) fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (56 - 83.8, n=31)
66.3 fps -18%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
63 fps -22%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
55.6 (53min - 60max) fps -31%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
39.6 fps -51%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
37.4 fps -54%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
161 (133min) fps +6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
151.4 (144min - 166max) fps
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
145 (127min - 163max) fps -4%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
142.7 fps -6%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
142 (118min) fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (86.5 - 151.4, n=22)
121 fps -20%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
108.9 fps -28%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
103 (98min - 108max) fps -32%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
66 fps -56%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
66 fps -56%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Aorus 17 YA
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
133.8 (117.2min) fps +6%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
129 (112.4min) fps +2%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
126 (109.6min) fps 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
126 (108.2min) fps
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
119.6 (103.2min) fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (105.8 - 126, n=13)
119.2 fps -5%
EVGA SC15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
117.9 fps -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
116.8 (99min) fps -7%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
116 (101.2min) fps -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
107.5 (90.7min) fps -15%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
104 (91min) fps -17%
0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512: Ø150.6 (141-160)
Average of class Gaming  : Ø196.1 (188.9-214)
låg med. hög ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 355.6 254.3 151.4 80.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 143 138 135 126
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 112 101 85.3
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512		Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)		Alienware m17 R2 P41E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)		Aorus 17G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ		Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Noise
-3%
-6%
-3%
-12%
1%
off / environment *
28.2
30
-6%
30
-6%
29.1
-3%
30
-6%
28.2
-0%
Idle Minimum *
28.2
32
-13%
31
-10%
29.4
-4%
35
-24%
28.2
-0%
Idle Average *
28.2
33
-17%
32
-13%
29.4
-4%
36
-28%
28.2
-0%
Idle Maximum *
30.5
34
-11%
38
-25%
31.5
-3%
41
-34%
30.8
-1%
Load Average *
42.2
40
5%
47
-11%
49.7
-18%
47
-11%
42
-0%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53
49
8%
48
9%
49.5
7%
48
9%
51
4%
Load Maximum *
55.5
50
10%
49
12%
53.3
4%
49
12%
53
5%

* ... smaller is better

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
28.2 / 28.2 / 30.5 dB(A)
Hög belastning
42.2 / 55.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)
Hög belastning
 38.4 °C40.8 °C34.8 °C 
 34.2 °C36 °C30.8 °C 
 32.2 °C26.8 °C30.4 °C 
Max: 40.8 °C
Medel: 33.8 °C
40.4 °C48.4 °C42.2 °C
35.6 °C43 °C39 °C
33 °C36.6 °C34.8 °C
Max: 48.4 °C
Medel: 39.2 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  62 °C | Rumstemperatur 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.2 °C / 91.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.3 °C / -7.8 F).
Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.44 / 0.85 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 19.6 / 21.7 / 36.1 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 115.6 / 219.9 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Lite-On CA5-8D512, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		Aorus 17G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Power Consumption
-14%
16%
-39%
-3%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
19.6
32
-63%
13
34%
24.7
-26%
20
-2%
34.2
-74%
Idle Average *
21.7
34
-57%
17
22%
35.9
-65%
23
-6%
37.2
-71%
Idle Maximum *
36.1
36
-0%
25
31%
69.6
-93%
38
-5%
50
-39%
Load Average *
115.6
95
18%
96
17%
141.8
-23%
105
9%
106.1
8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
157
155
1%
156
1%
185.8
-18%
158
-1%
178.7
-14%
Load Maximum *
219.9
187
15%
239
-9%
235.4
-7%
243
-11%
223.6
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
WiFi Websurfing
4tim 56min
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh		Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh		MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh		Alienware m17 R2 P41E
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh		Aorus 17G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94 Wh		Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Battery Runtime
-39%
21%
-2%
52%
-25%
WiFi v1.3
296
182
-39%
357
21%
290
-2%
450
52%
223
-25%
Reader / Idle
246
461
426
598
Load
69
74
31
134

För

+ Imponerande prestanda från dess GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
+ Samma tjusiga chassidesign som på 2019 års modell
+ 2x M.2 2280 och 2x SODIMM som är lätta att komma åt
+ Extremt snabb bilduppdatering på 300 Hz
+ Inbyggd UHS-III SD-kortläsare
+ Manuellt grafikbyte
+ Täcker hela sRGB
+ Längre Shift-tangent
+ Stor klickplatta
+ IR-kamera

Emot

- Smalare färgomfång och lägre kontrast jämfört med 4K-alternativet
- De sekundära tangentsymbolerna lyser inte upp i alla regioner
- AC-adaptern blir fortfarande väldigt varm vid belastning
- Tangentbordets knappar kunde varit skarpare och djupare
- Saknar fingeravtrycksläsare och skydd för webbkameran
- Mindre Up/Ner-piltangenter
- Fläktarna låter mycket när man spelar
- Saknar Optimus och G-Sync
- Mjuka klickplatte-knappar
Recension av Razer Blade Pro 17 RZ09-03297E42. Recensionsex från Razer
Recension av Razer Blade Pro 17 RZ09-03297E42. Recensionsex från Razer

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

I likehet med hur Blade 15 2020 är en mindre uppdatering till Blade 15 2019 är Blade Pro 17 2020 en mindre uppdatering av Blade Pro 17 2019. En ny åttakärnig CPU, Super Max-Q grafikkort och en 300 Hz-skärm är huvudanledningarna att skaffa 2020 års modell framför den från 2019, som istället har en sexkärnig CPU, Max-Q grafikkort och en 240 Hz-skärm. Uppdateringarna på insidan förbättrar bara spelprestandan en aning och man missar inte mycket om man istället väljer förra årets modell. Kom ihåg att du inte behöver nå 300 FPS när du spelar för att dra nytta av en 300 Hz-skärm.

En mer förvånande aspekt av Blade Pro 17 är inte den 10:e generationens Core CPU eller 300 Hz-skärmen utan hur snabbt systemet kan köra sin GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q GPU. 3DMark-resultaten är runt 20 procent snabbare än genomsnittet i vår databas för GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q. Därmed ger RTX 2070 Max-Q i Blade Pro 17 högre grafikprestanda än en del andra modellers nyare RTX 2070 Super Max-Q eller RTX 2080 Super Max-Q. Om du väljer den modellen av Blade Pro 17 2020 kan du vara säker på att du har ett av de snabbaste alternativen som finns med en GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q GPU.

300 Hz bilduppdatering är en lyx som bara de allra mest dedikerade spelarna kommer vilja ha. För alla andra räcker 240 Hz gott och väl. Av den anledningen tilltalar 2019 års Blade Pro-serie en bredare publik eftersom den dyrare versionen från 2020 inte erbjuder särskilt mycket bättre prestanda än förra årets modell.

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz - 06/27/2020 v7
Allen Ngo

Design
94 / 98 → 95%
Tangentbord
82%
Mus
92%
Anslutningar
71 / 80 → 88%
Vikt
58 / 10-66 → 86%
Batteri
63 / 95 → 66%
Skärm
82%
Spelprestanda
97%
Programprestanda
93%
Temperatur
85 / 95 → 89%
Ljudnivå
78 / 90 → 86%
Audio
80%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Medel
78%
87%
Gaming - Vägt medel

More articles related to this device

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz (Blade Pro 17 Serie)

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Razer Blade Pro 17 2020 - Behöver du verkligen en laptop med 300 Hz? (Sammanfattning)
Allen Ngo, 2020-06-30 (Update: 2020-06-30)