Notebookcheck

Test: Aorus 17 YA - Extrem prestanda, extrem ljudnivå (Sammanfattning)

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Glaser (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 12/10/2019

En val som blåser ut luft. Den är stor, den är högljudd och den är tung. Aorus 17 är definitivt inte till för den som gillar finstämda modeller med tyst drift. Den har istället massor av prestanda för gamers och riktar sig åt den som inte har något emot massiva laptops. I vårt test ska vi ta reda på exakt vad nya Aorus 17 YA har att erbjuda.

RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionBest Price
82%12/2019Aorus 17 YA
9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
3.8 kg38 mm17.3"1920x1080
87%Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2.8 kg19.9 mm17.3"3840x2160
86%Asus ROG G703GXR
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
4.7 kg48 mm17.3"1920x1080
83%09/2019Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
4.8 kg42 mm17.3"1920x1080
84%07/2019MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2.3 kg18.9 mm17.3"1920x1080
Aorus 17 YA
Processor
Intel Core i9-9980HK
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Kärna: 1380 MHz, Minne: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 441.12
Minne
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dubbla kanaler, alla platser upptagna, max 64 GB
Skärm
17.3 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN05.0 (AUO509D), IPS, Full-HD, 240 Hz, X-Rite Pantone, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel HM370
Hårddisk
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8, 1024 GB 
, + WDC WDC20SPZX-22UA7T0, 2 TB HDD. Platser: 2x M.2 Typ 2280 och 1x 2.5 tum
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Anslutningar
5 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: 1x 3.5 mm hörlurar, 1x 3.5 mm mikrofon, Kortläsare: SD, SDHC, SDXC
Nätverk
Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 38 x 396 x 293
Batteri
94.24 Wh, 6200 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: 0.9 MP, 16:9 (1280 x 720)
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2.1-högtalarsystem (Stereo + Subwoofer), Tangentbord: Chiclet, RGB, Mekaniskt, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 2x 330 Watt Nätadapter, XSplit Gamecaster Premium Abonnemang (3 månader), XSplit Broadcaster Premium Abonnemang (3 månader), 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
3.826 kg, Strömförsörjning: 2.352 kg
Pris
3900 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Aorus 17 YA
Aorus 17 YA
Aorus 17 YA
Aorus 17 YA
Aorus 17 YA
Aorus 17 YA
Aorus 17 YA
Aorus 17 YA

Storleksjämförelse

425 mm 319 mm 48 mm 4.7 kg430 mm 299 mm 42 mm 4.8 kg396 mm 293 mm 38 mm 3.8 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.8 kg396 mm 259 mm 18.9 mm 2.3 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.8 kg
Vänster: 1x USB 3.1 Gen1 Typ C, 1x Thunderbolt 3, 1x USB 3.1 Gen1 Typ A, 1x mikrofon, 1x hörlurar
Vänster: 1x USB 3.1 Gen1 Typ C, 1x Thunderbolt 3, 1x USB 3.1 Gen1 Typ A, 1x mikrofon, 1x hörlurar
Höger: 1x USB 3.1 Gen1 Typ C, UHS-II SD-kortläsare, 2x USB 3.1 Gen1 Typ A
Höger: 1x USB 3.1 Gen1 Typ C, UHS-II SD-kortläsare, 2x USB 3.1 Gen1 Typ A
Baksidan: HDMI, 2x nätadapter, GigabitLAN
Baksidan: HDMI, 2x nätadapter, GigabitLAN
Framsidan: Inga portar
Framsidan: Inga portar
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 17 YA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
206 MB/s ∼100%
Asus ROG G703GXR
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
194 MB/s ∼94% -6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
181.3 MB/s ∼88% -12%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
174.4 MB/s ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 206, n=264)
91.5 MB/s ∼44% -56%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG G703GXR
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
246 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Aorus 17 YA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
246 MB/s ∼100%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
203.4 MB/s ∼83% -17%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198 MB/s ∼80% -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=262)
109 MB/s ∼44% -56%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
692 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Aorus 17 YA
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
687 MBit/s ∼99%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
686 MBit/s ∼99% 0%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
682 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
676 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
655 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1490, n=286)
620 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Aorus 17 YA
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
743 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
729 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
697 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
677 MBit/s ∼91% -9%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
668 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
647 (min: 652) MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1420, n=286)
573 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
253
cd/m²
245
cd/m²
259
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
244
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
AU Optronics B173HAN05.0 (AUO509D)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 261 cd/m² Medel: 251.6 cd/m² Minimum: 11 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 253 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1265:1 (Svärta: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.14 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.01
ΔE Greyscale 1.12 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
98% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 66% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
Aorus 17 YA
AU Optronics B173HAN05.0 (AUO509D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
AU Optronics B173ZAN03.3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Asus ROG G703GXR
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
AU Optronics B173HAN03.1 (AUO319D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
6%
23%
-5%
33%
36%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16 (8.4, 7.6)
15.2 (8.4, 6.8)
5%
6.4 (3.4, 3)
60%
16.8 (8.4, 8.4)
-5%
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
55%
6.8 (3.4, 3.4)
57%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 (6.4, 4.8)
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
7%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-14%
11.6 (6, 5.6)
-4%
10 (5.2, 4.8)
11%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
14%
PWM Frequency
25510 (17)
Screen
-124%
-101%
-136%
-10%
-64%
Brightness middle
253
346.7
37%
290
15%
288
14%
366
45%
299.3
18%
Brightness
252
332
32%
281
12%
271
8%
343
36%
294
17%
Brightness Distribution
93
91
-2%
91
-2%
85
-9%
91
-2%
94
1%
Black Level *
0.2
0.27
-35%
0.2
-0%
0.2
-0%
0.29
-45%
0.29
-45%
Contrast
1265
1284
2%
1450
15%
1440
14%
1262
0%
1032
-18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.14
5.62
-393%
4.77
-318%
5.79
-408%
1.51
-32%
2.55
-124%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.01
9.36
-366%
9.08
-352%
11.89
-492%
3.22
-60%
4.73
-135%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.01
3.81
-277%
1.46
-45%
1.89
-87%
0.71
30%
2.9
-187%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.12
5.5
-391%
5.83
-421%
6.92
-518%
1.93
-72%
3.5
-213%
Gamma
2.43 91%
2.25 98%
2.47 89%
2.46 89%
2.38 92%
2.28 96%
CCT
6366 102%
6175 105%
8076 80%
8433 77%
6881 94%
7101 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
66
87.2
32%
59
-11%
60
-9%
60
-9%
57
-14%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98
100
2%
92
-6%
92
-6%
94
-4%
88.7
-9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-59% / -104%
-39% / -82%
-71% / -116%
12% / -4%
-14% / -49%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.4 ms rise
↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 13560 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

 
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420143014401450146014701480149015001510152015301540155015601570158015901600161016201630164016501660167016801690170017101720173017401750176017701780Tooltip
Aorus 17 YA Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1717 (1628.6-1778.57)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1076 (1067.18-1187.86)
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1328 (1301.11-1593.37)
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1024 (1016.29-1117.57)
Asus ROG G703GXR Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1251 (1244.71-1256.04)
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1224 (1159.08-1279)
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1133 (1114.27-1233.11)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus 17 YA
Intel Core i9-9980HK
213 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
Intel Core i9-9980HK
201 Points ∼94% -6%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Intel Core i7-9750H
185 Points ∼87% -13%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
180 Points ∼85% -15%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
180 Points ∼85% -15%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points ∼82% -18%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
171 Points ∼80% -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 215, n=540)
157 Points ∼74% -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus 17 YA
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1880 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1481 Points ∼79% -21%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Intel Core i7-9750H
1279 Points ∼68% -32%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
1256 Points ∼67% -33%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
1233 Points ∼66% -34%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
1180 Points ∼63% -37%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H
1094 Points ∼58% -42%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=543)
845 Points ∼45% -55%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
213 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1880 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
159.45 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Hjälp
PCMark 10 - Score
Aorus 17 YA
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
7082 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1014 (RAID 0)
6453 Points ∼91% -9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6202 Points ∼88% -12%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5955 Points ∼84% -16%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
5804 Points ∼82% -18%
Asus ROG G703GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5780 Points ∼82% -18%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5734 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=235)
5264 Points ∼74% -26%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Aorus 17 YA
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
6524 Points ∼100%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
5716 Points ∼88% -12%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5672 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6593, n=409)
5060 Points ∼78% -22%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4755 Points ∼73% -27%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
4668 Points ∼72% -28%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus 17 YA
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5731 Points ∼100%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
4461 Points ∼78% -22%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4412 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=426)
4272 Points ∼75% -25%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4255 Points ∼74% -26%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
3841 Points ∼67% -33%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5731 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6524 poäng
Hjälp
Aorus 17 YA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
Asus ROG G703GXR
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1014 (RAID 0)
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-12%
15%
12%
-23%
Write 4K
139.6
99.28
-29%
115.3
-17%
95.46
-32%
100.7
-28%
Read 4K
62.89
40.25
-36%
41.79
-34%
42.59
-32%
41.03
-35%
Write Seq
1573
2001
27%
2841
81%
2851
81%
1146
-27%
Read Seq
2808
2107
-25%
2547
-9%
2696
-4%
1115
-60%
Write 4K Q32T1
509.3
348.3
-32%
498.6
-2%
402.6
-21%
384.6
-24%
Read 4K Q32T1
639.3
391.5
-39%
554.5
-13%
443.9
-31%
429.5
-33%
Write Seq Q32T1
1573
2003
27%
3123
99%
3420
117%
1859
18%
Read Seq Q32T1
3082
3482
13%
3476
13%
3514
14%
3179
3%
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
Sequential Read: 2423 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1563 MB/s
512K Read: 1284 MB/s
512K Write: 1517 MB/s
4K Read: 35.85 MB/s
4K Write: 134.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 644.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 542.7 MB/s
3DMark - 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
168006 Points ∼100% +17%
Aorus 17 YA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
143755 Points ∼86%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
124764 Points ∼74% -13%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
124677 Points ∼74% -13%
Asus ROG G703GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
119847 Points ∼71% -17%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
118058 Points ∼70% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=547)
68923 Points ∼41% -52%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
39456 Points ∼23% -73%
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
47736 poäng
Hjälp
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H
105 (min: 86) fps ∼100% +10%
Asus ROG G703GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H
97.1 (min: 80) fps ∼92% +2%
Aorus 17 YA
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9980HK
95.4 (min: 80) fps ∼91%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
92.7 fps ∼88% -3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
87.4 fps ∼83% -8%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
76.9 fps ∼73% -19%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9980HK
66.5 fps ∼63% -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=335)
50.8 fps ∼48% -47%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 high (2/3)
Aorus 17 YA
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9980HK
140.7 (min: 123) fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (15.3 - 141, n=28)
96.2 fps ∼68% -32%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Aorus 17 YA
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9980HK
200 fps ∼100%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
189.5 fps ∼95% -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
177.7 fps ∼89% -11%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
163.7 fps ∼82% -18%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9980HK
155.7 fps ∼78% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.7 - 266, n=358)
99.7 fps ∼50% -50%
GRID 2019 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Aorus 17 YA
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9980HK
107 fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.9 - 107, n=11)
59.9 fps ∼56% -44%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110Tooltip
Aorus 17 YA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8: Ø97 (89-104)
låg med. hög ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 200 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 95.4 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 152.8 144.7 140.7 133.8 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 107 fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
42 / 44 / 52 dB(A)
Hög belastning
56 / 64 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.536.836.534.832.42546.644.944.940.543.53140.435.336.935.234.54041.636.139.633.1375046.149.640.439.946.56346.839.834.732.838.18041.140.139.627.155.9100424240.823.746.112540.536.933.224.439.816038.137.230.725.4402003733.729.523.441.525039.335.429.322.143.63154237.731.1214740043.640.832.619.349.450044.14132.618.950.263044.139.531.32050.880043.640.432.617.951100044.441.234.418.951.4125044.741.63318.552.3160045.241.732.318.252.3200046.1423417.453.4250046.343.13017.354.2315046.54126.617.453.5400043.337.825.117.553.5500039.333.221.117.550.1630034.628.420.417.546.1800030.124.31817.543.610000272117.817.540.61250024.319.217.817.338.91600021.31817.817.234.4SPL55.851.942.530.363.6N10.784.11.418.1median 42median 37.8median 30.7median 18.2median 49.4Delta5.154.61.65.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAorus 17 YA
Aorus 17 YA
9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Asus ROG G703GXR
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
20%
15%
20%
25%
23%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.2
6%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=338)
2%
Idle Minimum *
42
33
21%
30
29%
31
26%
28.2
33%
31.4 (28 - 42, n=761)
25%
Idle Average *
44
34
23%
34
23%
32
27%
28.2
36%
32.6 (28 - 46.6, n=761)
26%
Idle Maximum *
52
35
33%
45
13%
38
27%
30.8
41%
34.6 (28 - 52, n=761)
33%
Load Average *
56
38
32%
40
29%
47
16%
42
25%
40.8 (30.1 - 58, n=762)
27%
Witcher 3 ultra *
60
50
17%
57
5%
48
20%
51
15%
Load Maximum *
64
54
16%
60
6%
49
23%
53
17%
48.2 (38.9 - 64.1, n=762)
25%

* ... smaller is better

 44 °C38 °C46 °C 
 32 °C34 °C41 °C 
 32 °C32 °C30 °C 
Max: 46 °C
Medel: 36.6 °C
49 °C46 °C45 °C
46 °C45 °C41 °C
32 °C31 °C30 °C
Max: 49 °C
Medel: 40.6 °C
Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.2 °C / -5.8 F).
Aorus 17 YA
9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Asus ROG G703GXR
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-6%
-3%
-19%
2%
-6%
Maximum Upper Side *
46
46
-0%
37
20%
55
-20%
43
7%
45.9 (28 - 68.8, n=726)
-0%
Maximum Bottom *
49
49
-0%
40
18%
65
-33%
47.2
4%
49.6 (25.9 - 78, n=724)
-1%
Idle Upper Side *
28
31
-11%
34
-21%
30
-7%
27.2
3%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=678)
-10%
Idle Bottom *
28
32
-14%
36
-29%
32
-14%
30
-7%
31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=676)
-14%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.835.42540.5443135.235.94033.139.55039.941.86332.8368027.140.310023.741.812524.437.416025.436.820023.438.725022.150.53152153.840019.358.950018.964.56302069.980017.968.6100018.964.1125018.562.3160018.261.2200017.459.7250017.359.9315017.466.4400017.561.8500017.560.6630017.555.1800017.5581000017.557.81250017.3521600017.244.8SPL30.375.4N1.435.7median 18.2median 58.9Delta1.65.843.64438.140.737.939.338.939.537.336.336.836.435.337.234.242.933.148.433.558.332.962.331.467.831.171.43170.130.271.629.472.629.175.728.773.828.175.327.974.627.671.127.667.727.463.127.466.327.170.927.271.127.164.32759.226.956.726.954.640.283.63.960.4median 28.1median 67.81.95.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAorus 17 YARazer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Aorus 17 YA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.63 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 2 / 3 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 34 / 37 / 41 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 123 / 386 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus 17 YA
9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Asus ROG G703GXR
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
10%
7%
9%
42%
38%
34%
Idle Minimum *
34
34.2
-1%
27
21%
28
18%
13
62%
16.2
52%
19.4 (3.4 - 113, n=722)
43%
Idle Average *
37
37.2
-1%
32
14%
34
8%
17
54%
20.4
45%
24.9 (6.6 - 119, n=722)
33%
Idle Maximum *
41
50
-22%
39
5%
45
-10%
25
39%
26.1
36%
30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=722)
26%
Load Average *
123
106.1
14%
124
-1%
98
20%
96
22%
96.5
22%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=713)
15%
Load Maximum *
386
223.6
42%
338
12%
307
20%
239
38%
214.3
44%
173 (21.9 - 590, n=712)
55%
Witcher 3 ultra *
250
178.7
29%
274
-10%
263
-5%
156
38%
182.9
27%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3tim 55min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 51min
Aorus 17 YA
9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Asus ROG G703GXR
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 96 Wh
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 72 Wh
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-5%
6%
-36%
10%
-2%
-10%
Reader / Idle
484
213
461
295
349 (39 - 1174, n=681)
WiFi v1.3
235
223
-5%
367
56%
168
-29%
357
52%
280
19%
259 (78 - 622, n=387)
10%
Load
111
61
-45%
63
-43%
74
-33%
86
-23%
78.9 (18 - 202, n=648)
-29%
H.264
410
257 (88 - 508, n=149)

För

+ Riktigt bra CPU- och GPU-prestanda
+ Många servicemöjligheter
+ Mekaniskt tangentbord

Emot

- Låter extremt mycket
- Kraftig och tung
- Behöver två nätaggregat

Omdöme - Stark prestanda på bekostnad av ljudnivån

Aorus 17 YA. Recensionsex från Gigabyte Germany.
Aorus 17 YA. Recensionsex från Gigabyte Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

I våra tester visar Aorus 17 YA sitt sanna jag: en spellaptop för passionerade gamers. Hårdvaran kan utan problem visa aktuella spel smidigt på Full HD-skärmen och prestandareserven förbereder dessutom datorn för framtiden. Processorn kan använda sin fulla prestanda och grafikkortet har knappt några begränsningar alls. Det går att justera datorns beteende i detalj i Control Center, vilket säkrar hög flexibilitet. Dessutom har den bra servicemöjligheter, en skärm som är välkalibrerad redan vid leverans och rikligt med anslutningsmöjligheter.

Tack vare bra kylning kan Aorus 17 YA använda hårdvarans fulla potential. Men fläktens ljudnivå ligger verkligen på gränsen.

Ett kraftfullt kylsystem möjliggör förstklassig prestanda, men det leder också till det största klagomålet vi har på Aorus 17 YA. Även om man kan förvänta sig hög energiförbrukning från en dator med den här utrustningen så är fläktarnas ljudnivå något helt annat, till och med för en spelenhet. Vill man ha fullständig prestanda får man helt enkelt vara nöjd med att bära hörlurar och den kommer ändå irritera eventuella andra gamers som befinner sig i samma rum. Bortsett från det får man en spellaptop av riktigt hög kvalitet som till och med har ett mekaniskt tangentbord.

Aorus 17 YA - 12/04/2019 v7
Mike Wobker

Design
81 / 98 → 83%
Tangentbord
85%
Mus
83%
Anslutningar
71 / 80 → 89%
Vikt
51 / 10-66 → 73%
Batteri
57 / 95 → 60%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
95%
Programprestanda
96%
Temperatur
88 / 95 → 93%
Ljudnivå
22 / 90 → 24%
Audio
68%
Camera
33 / 85 → 39%
Medel
71%
82%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Aorus 17 YA - Extrem prestanda, extrem ljudnivå (Sammanfattning)
Mike Wobker, 2019-12-10 (Update: 2019-12-10)