Notebookcheck

Test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Inge Schwabe, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Sabrina Hartmann (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 03/26/2019

Quo Vadis. Den Kinesiska telefonen Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 heter nu - på grund av Xiaomis nya marknadsföringsstrategier - bara Redmi Note 7. Den är svår att kategorisera då den har den mest högupplösta kameran som för tillfället finns i någon smartphone och en relativt svag Snapdragon 660. Vi har testat den första officiella telefonen från sub-märket Redmi för att avslöja dess sanna potential.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Redmi Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Åtta kärnor, 64 Bit
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 512
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
6.3 tum 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 409 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, 10 punkters multitouch, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infraröd, Ljudanslutningar: Kombinerad 3.5 mm, USB Typ C, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 256 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, Kompass, Fingeravtrycksläsare, USB Typ C 2.0
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM 900/1800/1900 MHz, UMTS 850/900/1900/2100 MHz, FDD LTE: B1,B3,B5,B7,B8, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.1 x 159.21 x 75.21
Batteri
4000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix Dual: 48MP (Samsung GM1, 1/2", 0.8 µm, f/1.8) PDAF + 5MP (f/2.4) djupsensor, Dual-LED, [email protected]/60/120fps
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix HDR, AI-porträttläge, Video [email protected]
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, CHN AC-adapter, USB-laddare, Silikonhölje (+ EU-adapter och USB OTG-kabel), MIUI 10.2, Systemspråk: Engelska, Kinesiska; Game Speed Booster, 12 Månader Garanti, FM-radio, Infraröd, OTG, Wireless Display, Quick charge 4.0, fanless
Vikt
186 g, Strömförsörjning: 76 g
Pris
227 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Låsskärmen
Låsskärmen
Högtalaren mellan skärmen och det yttre chassit
Vänster sida, kort-tråget
Det inkluderade mjuka höljet
Redmi Note 7 i sitt hölje
Kameran sticker ut
OEM-demofoto
OEM-demofoto av den svarta modellen
OEM-demofoto av dream blue-modellen
OEM-demofoto av twilight gold-modellen

Storleksjämförelse

158.4 mm 75.64 mm 9.55 mm 186 g159.21 mm 75.21 mm 8.1 mm 186 g156.4 mm 75.8 mm 7.5 mm 169 g154.9 mm 74.8 mm 7.6 mm 175 g150.7 mm 72.3 mm 8.35 mm 168 g148.6 mm 71.2 mm 7.4 mm 145 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 MBit/s ∼100% +76%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash
356 (min: 342, max: 371) MBit/s ∼58% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
350 (min: 327, max: 361) MBit/s ∼57%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
281 MBit/s ∼46% -20%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s ∼40% -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=354)
219 MBit/s ∼36% -37%
Huawei P20 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
198 MBit/s ∼32% -43%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 MBit/s ∼100% +158%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
346 MBit/s ∼56% +45%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
307 MBit/s ∼50% +29%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash
285 (min: 142, max: 294) MBit/s ∼46% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
238 (min: 189, max: 285) MBit/s ∼39%
Huawei P20 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
233 MBit/s ∼38% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=354)
210 MBit/s ∼34% -12%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø350 (327-361)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø356 (342-371)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø238 (189-285)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø281 (142-294)
Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
Garmin Edge 500 - Damm
Garmin Edge 500 - Damm
Garmin Edge 500 - Slinga
Garmin Edge 500 - Slinga
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 - Översikt
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 - Översikt
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 - Damm
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 - Damm
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 - Slinga
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 - Slinga
48 MP-bild, Redmi Note 7
48 MP-bild, Redmi Note 7
48 MP-bild, Honor View 20
48 MP-bild, Honor View 20
HDR-foto (12MP), Redmi Note 7
HDR-foto (12MP), Honor View 20

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Referensbild
Referensbild
Förstoring av detaljer
Förstoring av detaljer
531
cd/m²
558
cd/m²
565
cd/m²
512
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
562
cd/m²
518
cd/m²
537
cd/m²
539
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 565 cd/m² Medel: 540.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.24 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 541 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1639:1 (Svärta: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
IPS, 2280x1080, 6.26
Huawei P20 Lite
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
Nokia 7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
LTPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Super AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2
Screen
-20%
-47%
-16%
-43%
-15%
Brightness middle
541
421
-22%
528
-2%
458
-15%
675
25%
429
-21%
Brightness
540
389
-28%
525
-3%
463
-14%
650
20%
432
-20%
Brightness Distribution
91
85
-7%
89
-2%
92
1%
92
1%
88
-3%
Black Level *
0.33
0.33
-0%
0.51
-55%
0.22
33%
0.46
-39%
Contrast
1639
1276
-22%
1035
-37%
2082
27%
1467
-10%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.7
3.4
-26%
4.7
-74%
4
-48%
5.9
-119%
3.39
-26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.6
5.9
-28%
8.9
-93%
7.4
-61%
9.5
-107%
5.25
-14%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.1
3.9
-26%
6.4
-106%
4.7
-52%
6.6
-113%
3.3
-6%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.26 97%
2.22 99%
2.19 100%
2.36 93%
2.238 98%
CCT
6853 95%
7330 89%
7987 81%
7425 88%
7846 83%
7135 91%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2336 Hz ≤ 18 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2336 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 18 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2336 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9858 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27.6 ms rise
↘ 32.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.7 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5576 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5640 Points ∼39% +1%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
3116 Points ∼22% -44%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5688 Points ∼40% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14299 Points ∼100% +156%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (4983 - 5811, n=9)
5524 Points ∼39% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 21070, n=244)
4673 Points ∼33% -16%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5913 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5893 Points ∼69% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
3749 Points ∼44% -37%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5867 Points ∼69% -1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5856 Points ∼69% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8548 Points ∼100% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (4895 - 5913, n=11)
5694 Points ∼67% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1634 - 11598, n=296)
4485 Points ∼52% -24%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1639 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1621 Points ∼66% -1%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
935 Points ∼38% -43%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1646 Points ∼67% 0%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1579 Points ∼65% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2441 Points ∼100% +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1431 - 1646, n=11)
1598 Points ∼65% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (590 - 4824, n=297)
1320 Points ∼54% -19%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6187 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
6052 Points ∼82% -2%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
4793 Points ∼65% -23%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6077 Points ∼83% -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5965 Points ∼81% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7360 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (5789 - 6187, n=10)
6022 Points ∼82% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2828 - 9868, n=307)
4797 Points ∼65% -22%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6870 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
6274 Points ∼70% -9%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
5704 Points ∼64% -17%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6825 Points ∼76% -1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6332 Points ∼71% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8967 Points ∼100% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (6274 - 7026, n=10)
6654 Points ∼74% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3977 - 13531, n=475)
5228 Points ∼58% -24%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2768 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2758 Points ∼99% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
1638 Points ∼59% -41%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2789 Points ∼100% +1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2615 Points ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2227 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (2121 - 2797, n=10)
2654 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (939 - 4439, n=322)
1782 Points ∼64% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1262 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1265 Points ∼30% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
401 Points ∼10% -68%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1239 Points ∼29% -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1268 Points ∼30% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4209 Points ∼100% +234%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1134 - 1268, n=10)
1235 Points ∼29% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (138 - 8206, n=322)
1538 Points ∼37% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1436 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1438 Points ∼41% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
482 Points ∼14% -66%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1441 Points ∼41% 0%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1432 Points ∼41% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3512 Points ∼100% +145%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1270 - 1442, n=10)
1403 Points ∼40% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (170 - 5913, n=325)
1430 Points ∼41% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2772 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2751 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
1671 Points ∼60% -40%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2768 Points ∼100% 0%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2756 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2145 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (2238 - 2815, n=10)
2700 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=338)
1755 Points ∼63% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2006 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2015 Points ∼34% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
604 Points ∼10% -70%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1980 Points ∼33% -1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2024 Points ∼34% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5922 Points ∼100% +195%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1734 - 2033, n=10)
1934 Points ∼33% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=338)
2111 Points ∼36% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2073 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2142 Points ∼51% +3%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
704 Points ∼17% -66%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2114 Points ∼50% +2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2151 Points ∼51% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4232 Points ∼100% +104%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1887 - 2151, n=10)
2055 Points ∼49% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 7856, n=339)
1789 Points ∼42% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2708 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2759 Points ∼100% +2%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
1757 Points ∼64% -35%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2749 Points ∼100% +2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2628 Points ∼95% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2118 Points ∼77% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1883 - 2759, n=10)
2573 Points ∼93% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (918 - 4216, n=398)
1712 Points ∼62% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1189 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1193 Points ∼32% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
207 Points ∼6% -83%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1161 Points ∼31% -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1196 Points ∼32% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3742 Points ∼100% +215%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1061 - 1201, n=10)
1173 Points ∼31% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6355, n=400)
1260 Points ∼34% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1358 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1365 Points ∼43% +1%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
257 Points ∼8% -81%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1332 Points ∼42% -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1361 Points ∼43% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3197 Points ∼100% +135%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1175 - 1372, n=11)
1339 Points ∼42% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (184 - 5509, n=408)
1203 Points ∼38% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2834 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2719 Points ∼96% -4%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
1760 Points ∼62% -38%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2734 Points ∼96% -4%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2638 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2176 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (2383 - 2834, n=10)
2700 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4215, n=432)
1612 Points ∼57% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1925 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1929 Points ∼29% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
109 Points ∼2% -94%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1895 Points ∼29% -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1938 Points ∼30% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6554 Points ∼100% +240%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1711 - 1938, n=10)
1891 Points ∼29% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 9963, n=432)
1706 Points ∼26% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2073 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2062 Points ∼46% -1%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
138 Points ∼3% -93%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2035 Points ∼45% -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2059 Points ∼45% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4529 Points ∼100% +118%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1825 - 2073, n=10)
2025 Points ∼45% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7166, n=440)
1460 Points ∼32% -30%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
19087 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
20437 Points ∼66% +7%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
13387 Points ∼44% -30%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
20085 Points ∼65% +5%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
19050 Points ∼62% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
30765 Points ∼100% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (15088 - 21016, n=10)
19357 Points ∼63% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3958 - 37475, n=591)
13336 Points ∼43% -30%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
29496 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
29116 Points ∼38% -1%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
11713 Points ∼15% -60%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
29333 Points ∼38% -1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
29306 Points ∼38% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
77003 Points ∼100% +161%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (25561 - 29496, n=10)
28566 Points ∼37% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1152 - 162695, n=591)
19149 Points ∼25% -35%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
26308 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
26605 Points ∼46% +1%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
12048 Points ∼21% -54%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
26610 Points ∼46% +1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
26175 Points ∼45% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
57711 Points ∼100% +119%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (22145 - 26731, n=10)
25808 Points ∼45% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2915 - 77599, n=592)
16033 Points ∼28% -39%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
51 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
50 fps ∼49% -2%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
19 fps ∼19% -63%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
50 fps ∼49% -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
46 fps ∼45% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
102 fps ∼100% +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (43 - 51, n=10)
48.2 fps ∼47% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.1 - 251, n=615)
33.3 fps ∼33% -35%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
44 fps ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
47 fps ∼81% +7%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
19 fps ∼33% -57%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
48 fps ∼83% +9%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
51 fps ∼88% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (42 - 52, n=10)
47.8 fps ∼82% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.9 - 120, n=618)
26.1 fps ∼45% -41%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
23 fps ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
22 fps ∼41% -4%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
8.7 fps ∼16% -62%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
23 fps ∼43% 0%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
23 fps ∼43% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
54 fps ∼100% +135%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (20 - 23, n=10)
22.3 fps ∼41% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.2 - 132, n=536)
18.1 fps ∼34% -21%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
20 fps ∼39%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
21 fps ∼41% +5%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
8.9 fps ∼17% -55%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
22 fps ∼43% +10%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
22 fps ∼43% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
51 fps ∼100% +155%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (19 - 23, n=10)
21.3 fps ∼42% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.1 - 115, n=540)
17 fps ∼33% -15%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
15 fps ∼47%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
15 fps ∼47% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
5.2 fps ∼16% -65%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
14 fps ∼44% -7%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
15 fps ∼47% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32 fps ∼100% +113%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (13 - 15, n=10)
14.5 fps ∼45% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.6 - 88, n=397)
15.2 fps ∼48% +1%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
13 fps ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
14 fps ∼48% +8%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
5.6 fps ∼19% -57%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
15 fps ∼52% +15%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
14 fps ∼48% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
29 fps ∼100% +123%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (12 - 15, n=11)
13.7 fps ∼47% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.5 - 110, n=400)
14.7 fps ∼51% +13%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
4.8 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5.1 fps ∼53% +6%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5.2 fps ∼54% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (3 - 6.3, n=5)
4.88 fps ∼50% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 59, n=102)
9.68 fps ∼100% +102%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
3.2 fps ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
3.2 fps ∼48% 0%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
3.2 fps ∼48% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (3.2 - 4.8, n=5)
3.52 fps ∼53% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 31, n=102)
6.68 fps ∼100% +109%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
7.6 fps ∼53%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.1 fps ∼57% +7%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.2 fps ∼57% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (7.5 - 9.7, n=5)
8.22 fps ∼57% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 59, n=102)
14.3 fps ∼100% +88%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.7 fps ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.5 fps ∼53% -2%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.6 fps ∼54% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (8.5 - 8.7, n=5)
8.6 fps ∼54% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.77 - 63, n=101)
16 fps ∼100% +84%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
9.1 fps ∼36%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
9 fps ∼36% -1%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
3.1 fps ∼12% -66%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.3 fps ∼33% -9%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
9.1 fps ∼36% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
25 fps ∼100% +175%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (8.1 - 9.1, n=10)
8.88 fps ∼36% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 54, n=327)
10.4 fps ∼42% +14%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
7.8 fps ∼33%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.4 fps ∼35% +8%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
3.3 fps ∼14% -58%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
9.1 fps ∼38% +17%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.6 fps ∼36% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +208%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (7.5 - 9.8, n=11)
8.58 fps ∼36% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 58, n=330)
9.4 fps ∼39% +21%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
143352 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
143551 Points ∼50% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
88550 Points ∼31% -38%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
141701 Points ∼49% -1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
140875 Points ∼49% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
288062 Points ∼100% +101%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (116346 - 143551, n=10)
137699 Points ∼48% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (41483 - 374820, n=220)
125525 Points ∼44% -12%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
118368 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
118773 Points ∼51% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
68232 Points ∼29% -42%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
117165 Points ∼50% -1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
115834 Points ∼50% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
232931 Points ∼100% +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (105973 - 120479, n=11)
116194 Points ∼50% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23275 - 274007, n=435)
81530 Points ∼35% -31%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1086 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1086 Points ∼84% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
858 Points ∼67% -21%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1101 Points ∼85% +1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1146 Points ∼89% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1288 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1027 - 1146, n=10)
1092 Points ∼85% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=548)
720 Points ∼56% -34%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2308 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2293 Points ∼29% -1%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
848 Points ∼11% -63%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2298 Points ∼29% 0%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2279 Points ∼29% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7965 Points ∼100% +245%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1970 - 2332, n=10)
2257 Points ∼28% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=548)
1852 Points ∼23% -20%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2332 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2269 Points ∼64% -3%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
1930 Points ∼55% -17%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2503 Points ∼71% +7%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2494 Points ∼71% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3521 Points ∼100% +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1737 - 2799, n=10)
2360 Points ∼67% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 6283, n=548)
1352 Points ∼38% -42%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5141 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5237 Points ∼80% +2%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
3109 Points ∼47% -40%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
4976 Points ∼76% -3%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5048 Points ∼77% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6556 Points ∼100% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (3745 - 5282, n=10)
4957 Points ∼76% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=548)
2705 Points ∼41% -47%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2342 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2332 Points ∼59% 0%
Huawei P20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2, 4096
1445 Points ∼37% -38%
Nokia 7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2369 Points ∼60% +1%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2394 Points ∼61% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3923 Points ∼100% +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  (1905 - 2428, n=11)
2314 Points ∼59% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=552)
1344 Points ∼34% -43%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
80.876 Points ∼100% +48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
54.708 Points ∼68%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
53.89 Points ∼67% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
52.897 Points ∼65% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (45.3 - 55.5, n=10)
52.4 Points ∼65% -4%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
49.396 Points ∼61% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 273, n=470)
37.8 Points ∼47% -31%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
23.424 Points ∼29% -57%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
14617 Points ∼100% +37%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
10945 Points ∼75% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
10679 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
10378 Points ∼71% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8463 - 10945, n=11)
10080 Points ∼69% -6%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
9582 Points ∼66% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=609)
5917 Points ∼40% -45%
Huawei P20 Lite
4191 Points ∼29% -61%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=628)
11104 ms * ∼100% -181%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
10788.1 ms * ∼97% -173%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
4093.5 ms * ∼37% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3796 - 4769, n=10)
4057 ms * ∼37% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
3948 ms * ∼36%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
3937.3 ms * ∼35% -0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
3879.5 ms * ∼35% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
2316.8 ms * ∼21% +41%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (24 - 161, n=87)
65.1 Points ∼100% +7%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
63 Points ∼97% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
62 Points ∼95% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
61 Points ∼94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (58 - 63, n=6)
60.7 Points ∼93% 0%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
58 Points ∼89% -5%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
34 Points ∼52% -44%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
251 Points ∼100% +44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
174 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite (Chrome 71)
171 Points ∼68% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (159 - 182, n=8)
171 Points ∼68% -2%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
168 Points ∼67% -3%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
159 Points ∼63% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 362, n=311)
117 Points ∼47% -33%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
86 Points ∼34% -51%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7Xiaomi Mi 8 LiteHuawei P20 LiteNokia 7 PlusBQ Aquaris X2 ProXiaomi Mi 8 Explorer EditionAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
2%
53%
-1%
-7%
62%
-6%
-25%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
59.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
63.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
69.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
16%
62.31
5%
61.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
55.1 (59.5 - 74.7, n=87)
-7%
47.2 (19.2 - 87.1, n=360)
-21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
83.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
82.21
-1%
83.35 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
73.4 (83.2 - 87.2, n=87)
-12%
65.4 (29.8 - 96.5, n=360)
-21%
Random Write 4KB
16.06
18.75
17%
71.07
343%
19.62
22%
15.43
-4%
22.65
41%
22.7 (3.4 - 88.2, n=96)
41%
18.5 (0.14 - 250, n=657)
15%
Random Read 4KB
82.94
81.25
-2%
48.19
-42%
54.65
-34%
51.25
-38%
135.21
63%
52.8 (11.4 - 149, n=96)
-36%
41.9 (1.59 - 174, n=657)
-49%
Sequential Write 256KB
204.72
172.43
-16%
198.3
-3%
211.6
3%
204.83
0%
205.23
0%
171 (40 - 246, n=96)
-16%
86.9 (2.99 - 388, n=657)
-58%
Sequential Read 256KB
283.36
282.62
0%
293.94
4%
283.12
0%
280.78
-1%
691.65
144%
272 (115 - 704, n=96)
-4%
244 (12.1 - 912, n=657)
-14%
Asphalt 9 - Legends - Jämförelse
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality; 1.4.1a: Ø28.2 (26-30)
; Standard / low; 1.4.1a: Ø28 (24-31)
Subway Surfers - Jämförelse
0102030405060Tooltip
; 1.100.0: Ø59.7 (51-60)
Hög belastning
 33.8 °C32.8 °C31.4 °C 
 33.1 °C32.7 °C32.2 °C 
 32.5 °C32.9 °C31.4 °C 
Max: 33.8 °C
Medel: 32.5 °C
28.8 °C31.1 °C33.9 °C
28 °C31.2 °C34.2 °C
29.2 °C31.1 °C33.6 °C
Max: 34.2 °C
Medel: 31.2 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  28.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.635.42528.224.53124.624402124.4502834.76327.226.88025.422.210023.621.512519.223.91602040.820016.449.72501756.631516.560.440015.665.250014.37063012.869.78001470.3100014.673125014.276.816001476.9200014.179.5250014.479.4315014.277.4400014.675.5500014.173.1630014.666.9800014.767.71000015.1731250014.968.4160001557SPL26.687.6N0.869median 14.6median 69.7Delta1.6935.24232.941.837.230.431.736.639.641.828.331.427.331.526.934.226.731.42429.620.938.320.947.619.546.618.55417.562.817.559.415.758.915.86316.666.415.869.315.471.315.573.41674.815.875.91676.516.371.216.371.616.271.316.467.516.459.628.684.11.153.6median 16.4median 632.111.331.727.933.935.647.65031.234.63837.527.128.327.129.424.627.320.634.318.840.918.546.417.749.71752.216.55916.961.114.463.71468.313.567.513.765.913.967.312.767.812.770.112.769.412.566.611.96311.461.611.564.411.664.111.552.811.442.570.167.725.778.725.721.20.743median 13.7median 632.58.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 7Huawei P20 LiteXiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei P20 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.11 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.61 / 1.95 / 2.03 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.56 / 9.15 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
3350 mAh
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
3100 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
1%
-3%
3%
-1%
-69%
-4%
3%
Idle Minimum *
0.61
0.56
8%
0.98
-61%
0.65
-7%
0.63
-3%
1.8
-195%
0.738 (0.56 - 1.2, n=10)
-21%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=687)
-44%
Idle Average *
1.95
1.99
-2%
2
-3%
1.76
10%
2.16
-11%
2.9
-49%
1.903 (1.4 - 2.2, n=10)
2%
1.729 (0.6 - 6.2, n=686)
11%
Idle Maximum *
2.03
2.05
-1%
2.11
-4%
1.78
12%
2.18
-7%
3.5
-72%
2.21 (1.54 - 4.1, n=10)
-9%
2.01 (0.74 - 6.6, n=687)
1%
Load Average *
4.56
4.62
-1%
3.9
14%
4.47
2%
4.48
2%
4.8
-5%
4.61 (3.47 - 8.2, n=10)
-1%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=681)
11%
Load Maximum *
9.15
8.94
2%
5.62
39%
9.13
-0%
7.87
14%
11.2
-22%
8.22 (5.93 - 12.2, n=10)
10%
5.84 (1.2 - 14.2, n=681)
36%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
32tim 30min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12tim 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15tim 40min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 19min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite
3350 mAh
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
3100 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-29%
-35%
-22%
-31%
-17%
Reader / Idle
1950
1678
-14%
750
-62%
1703
-13%
1374
-30%
1401
-28%
H.264
940
662
-30%
470
-50%
706
-25%
658
-30%
921
-2%
WiFi v1.3
768
547
-29%
582
-24%
672
-12%
605
-21%
694
-10%
Load
259
150
-42%
247
-5%
158
-39%
145
-44%
191
-26%

För

+ kamera med upplösning på 48 MP
+ utmärkt uthållighet
+ i princip kantlös skärm
+ utökningsbar lagring
+ headset både genom USB Typ C och 3.5 mm ljudanslutning
+ prydligt chassi
+ dual-SIM

Emot

- hybridplats: antingen dual-SIM eller lagringsexpansion
- systemspråkets engelska (CHN-modellen)
- ingen IP-certifiering
- inget stöd för DRM L1
- inget stöd för NFC
- få LTE-band
- monohögtalare
- kameran sticker märkbart ut från höljet
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 från
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 från

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Så hur står sig Xiaomi-telefonen med den höga kameraupplösningen och den i övrigt genomsnittliga hårdvaran mot sina konkurrenter?

Note 7 har ett tydligt övertag över P20 Lite. Den presterar bättre inte bara i fråga om rå prestanda utan även i områden som WiFi-prestanda och batteritid.

Qualcomm-konkurrensen är ganska jämnt matchad. För mellan 2.000 och 2.500 kronor beroende på lagringskonfiguration så är priserna jämförbara med vad Note 7 kostar. Således handlar valet om detaljer som extra funktioner eller estetik, även om ingen av de andra tre kandidaterna kan rå på Note i fråga om kameraupplösning.

När vi genomförde testet kostade 64 GB-versionen av Xiaomi Mi 8 fortfarande 3.500 kronor och modellen med 128 GB kostade bara runt 100 - 150 kr mer. Utöver det högre priset behöver Mi 8:s prestanda utvärderas med en lägre uthållighet i åtanke, vilket är anledningen till att vi inte kan ge ett definitivt svar vid skrivande stund.

Redmi Note 7 är en bra mittenskiktstelefon, kameran på 48 MP är dess definierande egenskap.

I ett vakuum kan vi uppskatta Xiaomis funktionella MIUI, som erbjuder mer än vad vi kan täcka i den här recensionen. Men med det sagt så kommer den Kinesiska modellen också med mycket onödig mjukvara och en del av AI-funktionerna kan tydligen inte användas i Europa.

Framåt slutet av recensionen fick vi information om de tre nu tillgängliga versionerna av Redmi Note 7:

  • Redmi Note 7 China: kamera på 48 MP, upp till 6 GB RAM, inget stöd för LTE band 20
  • Redmi Note 7 Global India: kamera på 12 MP, upp till 4 GB RAM, LTE band 20
  • Redmi Note 7 Global Europe: kamera på 48 MP, upp till 4 GB RAM, LTE band 20

Detta bör göra den eleganta Kinesiska telefonen ännu mer tilltalande i Tyskland och övriga Europa.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 - 03/12/2019 v6
Inge Schwabe

Design
80%
Tangentbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Mus
82%
Anslutningar
43 / 60 → 72%
Vikt
89%
Batteri
96%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
54 / 63 → 86%
Programprestanda
61 / 70 → 87%
Temperatur
93%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
75%
Medel
76%
85%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Inge Schwabe, 2019-03-26 (Update: 2019-03-26)