Notebookcheck

Test: BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 07/29/2018

Mer kraft! BQ har tillverkat en ny utgåva av sin topp-smartphone - inklusive en Pro-version. Fina former och färger möter en toppskikts-SoC, rikligt med lagring, nya kameror - och ett högt pris. Är Pro-modellen värd sin extra kostnad? Få reda på det i vår recension.

BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Aquaris Serie)
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 512, Kärna: 650 MHz
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
5.65 tum 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixlar 427 PPI, 10 punkters kapacitiv tryckkänslig, LTPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51.8 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 256 GB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: närhetssensor, accelerometer, Hall-sensor, eKompass, gyroskop, FM-radio, OTG, USB-PD, Galileo
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 och 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900 och 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 6 (Band 1, 3, 7 och 20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.35 x 150.7 x 72.3
Batteri
3100 mAh Litiumjon, QuickCharge 4+
Operativsystem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Samsung S5K2L8, bländare f/1.8, 1.29 μm/pixel, 6 Largan-linser, Dual-Tonsblixt, autofokus med fasdetektion Dual-PD) + 5 MP (Samsung S5K5E8, 1.12 μm), Ultra-HD video med stabilisering
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (Samsung S5K4H7, bländare f/2.0, 1.12 μm/pixel, 4 linser, framåtriktad blixt, Full-HD video)
Övrigt
Högtalare: dubbla högtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt, nätadapter, USB-kabel, Snabbstartsguide, säkerhetsinformation, Android One, BQ Plus, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR (Huvud): 1.495 W/Kg, SAR (Kropp): 1.451 W/Kg, IP52-certifierad, fanless
Vikt
168 g, Strömförsörjning: 35 g
Pris
400 Kr
Länkar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Mellanrummens mått är inte särskilt jämna.
Mellanrummens mått är inte särskilt jämna.

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
281 MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
242 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
232 MBit/s ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=306)
211 MBit/s ∼75% -25%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
210 MBit/s ∼75% -25%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
346 MBit/s ∼100%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
307 MBit/s ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
269 MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
237 MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
236 MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=306)
206 MBit/s ∼60% -40%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
148 MBit/s ∼43% -57%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro - Översikt
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro - Översikt
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro - Trafikplats
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro - Trafikplats
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro - Runt sjön
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro - Runt sjön
Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
Garmin Edge 500 - Trafikplats
Garmin Edge 500 - Trafikplats
Garmin Edge 500 - Runt sjön
Garmin Edge 500 - Runt sjön

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
621
cd/m²
636
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
675
cd/m²
673
cd/m²
663
cd/m²
659
cd/m²
673
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 675 cd/m² Medel: 650.3 cd/m² Minimum: 13.5 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 675 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1467:1 (Svärta: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.9 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.36
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
LTPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
BQ Aquaris X Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Honor 10
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6
Nokia 7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 5.6
Screen
-31%
15%
-10%
15%
6%
Brightness middle
675
458
-32%
555
-18%
446
-34%
458
-32%
541
-20%
Brightness
650
473
-27%
537
-17%
451
-31%
463
-29%
538
-17%
Brightness Distribution
92
88
-4%
94
2%
93
1%
92
0%
96
4%
Black Level *
0.46
0.51
-11%
0.39
15%
0.22
52%
Contrast
1467
898
-39%
1423
-3%
2082
42%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.9
7.1
-20%
2.3
61%
6.58
-12%
4
32%
5.8
2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.5
14.5
-53%
6
37%
11.94
-26%
7.4
22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.6
10.5
-59%
3.9
41%
3.6
45%
4.7
29%
2.7
59%
Gamma
2.36 93%
2.28 96%
2.19 100%
2.199 100%
2.19 100%
2.07 106%
CCT
7846 83%
8951 73%
6212 105%
7116 91%
7425 88%
6570 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2315 Hz ≤ 46 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2315 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 46 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2315 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8931 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.2 ms rise
↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
115834 Points ∼66%
Honor 10
174272 Points ∼100% +50%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
66226 Points ∼38% -43%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
93813 Points ∼54% -19%
Nokia 7 Plus
117165 Points ∼67% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
83284 Points ∼48% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
110680 Points ∼64% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (110680 - 120479, n=6)
116609 Points ∼67% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=389)
76442 Points ∼44% -34%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
140875 Points ∼69%
Honor 10
205297 Points ∼100% +46%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
82343 Points ∼40% -42%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
115656 Points ∼56% -18%
Nokia 7 Plus
141701 Points ∼69% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
116746 Points ∼57% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
140714 Points ∼69% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (126462 - 142189, n=5)
138388 Points ∼67% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=170)
118332 Points ∼58% -16%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5965 Points ∼85%
Honor 10
7046 Points ∼100% +18%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4915 Points ∼70% -18%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
5640 Points ∼80% -5%
Nokia 7 Plus
6077 Points ∼86% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5214 Points ∼74% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
5995 Points ∼85% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (5965 - 6124, n=5)
6042 Points ∼86% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=255)
4555 Points ∼65% -24%
Work performance score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
6332 Points ∼74%
Honor 10
8530 Points ∼100% +35%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
5886 Points ∼69% -7%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
6457 Points ∼76% +2%
Nokia 7 Plus
6825 Points ∼80% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5916 Points ∼69% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
6723 Points ∼79% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (6332 - 7026, n=5)
6766 Points ∼79% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=423)
4958 Points ∼58% -22%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1146 Points ∼87%
Honor 10
1316 Points ∼100% +15%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
806 Points ∼61% -30%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1052 Points ∼80% -8%
Nokia 7 Plus
1101 Points ∼84% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1195 Points ∼91% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1108 Points ∼84% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1078 - 1146, n=5)
1105 Points ∼84% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=499)
698 Points ∼53% -39%
Graphics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2279 Points ∼52%
Honor 10
4397 Points ∼100% +93%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1012 Points ∼23% -56%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1625 Points ∼37% -29%
Nokia 7 Plus
2298 Points ∼52% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1331 Points ∼30% -42%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2295 Points ∼52% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2257 - 2298, n=5)
2283 Points ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=499)
1737 Points ∼40% -24%
Memory (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2494 Points ∼65%
Honor 10
3808 Points ∼100% +53%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1046 Points ∼27% -58%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
2208 Points ∼58% -11%
Nokia 7 Plus
2503 Points ∼66% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
2275 Points ∼60% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2470 Points ∼65% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2256 - 2503, n=5)
2414 Points ∼63% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=499)
1244 Points ∼33% -50%
System (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5048 Points ∼86%
Honor 10
5882 Points ∼100% +17%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3492 Points ∼59% -31%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
4628 Points ∼79% -8%
Nokia 7 Plus
4976 Points ∼85% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4358 Points ∼74% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
4797 Points ∼82% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (4797 - 5282, n=5)
5066 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=499)
2512 Points ∼43% -50%
Overall (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2394 Points ∼71%
Honor 10
3374 Points ∼100% +41%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1314 Points ∼39% -45%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
2044 Points ∼61% -15%
Nokia 7 Plus
2369 Points ∼70% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1993 Points ∼59% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2343 Points ∼69% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2322 - 2394, n=6)
2348 Points ∼70% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=503)
1255 Points ∼37% -48%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5688 Points ∼66%
Honor 10
8634 Points ∼100% +52%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
4501 Points ∼52% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3680 Points ∼43% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
5486 Points ∼64% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (5486 - 5811, n=4)
5664 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=197)
4524 Points ∼52% -20%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5856 Points ∼89%
Honor 10
6610 Points ∼100% +13%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4369 Points ∼66% -25%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
4941 Points ∼75% -16%
Nokia 7 Plus
5867 Points ∼89% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4431 Points ∼67% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
5843 Points ∼88% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (5806 - 5867, n=6)
5847 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=247)
4308 Points ∼65% -26%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1579 Points ∼84%
Honor 10
1890 Points ∼100% +20%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
928 Points ∼49% -41%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1330 Points ∼70% -16%
Nokia 7 Plus
1646 Points ∼87% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1526 Points ∼81% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1620 Points ∼86% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1579 - 1646, n=6)
1619 Points ∼86% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=248)
1270 Points ∼67% -20%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2628 Points ∼95%
Honor 10
2582 Points ∼94% -2%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2132 Points ∼77% -19%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
2327 Points ∼84% -11%
Nokia 7 Plus
2749 Points ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1950 Points ∼71% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2757 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2628 - 2757, n=5)
2714 Points ∼98% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=352)
1642 Points ∼60% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1196 Points ∼40%
Honor 10
2993 Points ∼100% +150%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
379 Points ∼13% -68%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
815 Points ∼27% -32%
Nokia 7 Plus
1161 Points ∼39% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
618 Points ∼21% -48%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1164 Points ∼39% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1161 - 1201, n=5)
1183 Points ∼40% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=352)
1186 Points ∼40% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1361 Points ∼47%
Honor 10
2891 Points ∼100% +112%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
464 Points ∼16% -66%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
953 Points ∼33% -30%
Nokia 7 Plus
1332 Points ∼46% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
729 Points ∼25% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1335 Points ∼46% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1332 - 1372, n=6)
1353 Points ∼47% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=360)
1134 Points ∼39% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2638 Points ∼95%
Honor 10
2773 Points ∼100% +5%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2127 Points ∼77% -19%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
2337 Points ∼84% -11%
Nokia 7 Plus
2734 Points ∼99% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1946 Points ∼70% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2680 Points ∼97% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2638 - 2780, n=5)
2714 Points ∼98% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=384)
1540 Points ∼56% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1938 Points ∼54%
Honor 10
3573 Points ∼100% +84%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
725 Points ∼20% -63%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1333 Points ∼37% -31%
Nokia 7 Plus
1895 Points ∼53% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
879 Points ∼25% -55%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1891 Points ∼53% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1856 - 1938, n=5)
1903 Points ∼53% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=384)
1632 Points ∼46% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2059 Points ∼61%
Honor 10
3358 Points ∼100% +63%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
849 Points ∼25% -59%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1474 Points ∼44% -28%
Nokia 7 Plus
2035 Points ∼61% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1001 Points ∼30% -51%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2023 Points ∼60% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1999 - 2071, n=5)
2037 Points ∼61% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=392)
1387 Points ∼41% -33%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
19050 Points ∼90%
Honor 10
21070 Points ∼100% +11%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
17044 Points ∼81% -11%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
16939 Points ∼80% -11%
Nokia 7 Plus
20085 Points ∼95% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
13306 Points ∼63% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
21016 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (19050 - 21016, n=5)
20110 Points ∼95% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=539)
12880 Points ∼61% -32%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
29306 Points ∼90%
Honor 10
32674 Points ∼100% +11%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13277 Points ∼41% -55%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
20908 Points ∼64% -29%
Nokia 7 Plus
29333 Points ∼90% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15262 Points ∼47% -48%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
28984 Points ∼89% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (26322 - 29422, n=5)
28673 Points ∼88% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=539)
17994 Points ∼55% -39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
26175 Points ∼90%
Honor 10
29111 Points ∼100% +11%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13963 Points ∼48% -47%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
19873 Points ∼68% -24%
Nokia 7 Plus
26610 Points ∼91% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
14779 Points ∼51% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
26731 Points ∼92% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (24669 - 26731, n=5)
26177 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=540)
15114 Points ∼52% -42%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
46 fps ∼37%
Honor 10
124 fps ∼100% +170%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
23 fps ∼19% -50%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
36 fps ∼29% -22%
Nokia 7 Plus
50 fps ∼40% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
34 fps ∼27% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
50 fps ∼40% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (43 - 51, n=5)
48 fps ∼39% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=564)
31.4 fps ∼25% -32%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
51 fps ∼86%
Honor 10
59 fps ∼100% +16%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
22 fps ∼37% -57%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
35 fps ∼59% -31%
Nokia 7 Plus
48 fps ∼81% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
31 fps ∼53% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
48 fps ∼81% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (47 - 52, n=5)
49.2 fps ∼83% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=567)
25 fps ∼42% -51%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
23 fps ∼39%
Honor 10
59 fps ∼100% +157%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.8 fps ∼17% -57%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
16 fps ∼27% -30%
Nokia 7 Plus
23 fps ∼39% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
16 fps ∼27% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
23 fps ∼39% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (21 - 23, n=5)
22.6 fps ∼38% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=486)
16.8 fps ∼28% -27%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
22 fps ∼44%
Honor 10
50 fps ∼100% +127%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.6 fps ∼19% -56%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
15 fps ∼30% -32%
Nokia 7 Plus
22 fps ∼44% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15 fps ∼30% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
21 fps ∼42% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (21 - 23, n=5)
21.8 fps ∼44% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=489)
16 fps ∼32% -27%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
15 fps ∼38%
Honor 10
39 fps ∼100% +160%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.4 fps ∼16% -57%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
10 fps ∼26% -33%
Nokia 7 Plus
14 fps ∼36% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.9 fps ∼25% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
15 fps ∼38% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (13 - 15, n=5)
14.4 fps ∼37% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=349)
14.3 fps ∼37% -5%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
14 fps ∼41%
Honor 10
34 fps ∼100% +143%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.3 fps ∼19% -55%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
9.8 fps ∼29% -30%
Nokia 7 Plus
15 fps ∼44% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.6 fps ∼28% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
14 fps ∼41% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (12 - 15, n=6)
13.8 fps ∼41% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=352)
13.9 fps ∼41% -1%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
9.1 fps ∼40%
Honor 10
23 fps ∼100% +153%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼15% -62%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
6.3 fps ∼27% -31%
Nokia 7 Plus
8.3 fps ∼36% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
6 fps ∼26% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
9 fps ∼39% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8.3 - 9.1, n=5)
8.9 fps ∼39% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=280)
9.86 fps ∼43% +8%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
8.6 fps ∼43%
Honor 10
20 fps ∼100% +133%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼18% -59%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
6 fps ∼30% -30%
Nokia 7 Plus
9.1 fps ∼46% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5.8 fps ∼29% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
8.6 fps ∼43% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8.3 - 9.8, n=6)
8.83 fps ∼44% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=283)
8.89 fps ∼44% +3%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
15.07 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3.052 fps ∼20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
15.1 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (1.06 - 38.7, n=72)
12.1 fps ∼80%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
349 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
355 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
353 Points ∼51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (349 - 353, n=2)
351 Points ∼51%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 2754, n=76)
693 Points ∼100%

Legend

 
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
56.506 Points ∼100% +14%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
53.89 Points ∼95% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (49.4 - 54.7, n=5)
52.7 Points ∼93% +7%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
49.396 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
49.07 Points ∼87% -1%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
44.587 Points ∼79% -10%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
44.245 Points ∼78% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=422)
36.7 Points ∼65% -26%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
26.837 Points ∼47% -46%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
10965 Points ∼100% +14%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
10945 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (9582 - 10945, n=6)
10106 Points ∼92% +5%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
9582 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
9350 Points ∼85% -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
9004 Points ∼82% -6%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
8519 Points ∼78% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=558)
5562 Points ∼51% -42%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
4424 Points ∼40% -54%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=578)
11474 ms * ∼100% -180%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
8741.5 ms * ∼76% -114%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
4820 ms * ∼42% -18%
BQ Aquaris X2
4733 ms * ∼41% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
4275.2 ms * ∼37% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3796 - 4769, n=5)
4105 ms * ∼36% -0%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
4093.5 ms * ∼36%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
3937.3 ms * ∼34% +4%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
3899 ms * ∼34% +5%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
182 Points ∼100% +14%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
168 Points ∼92% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (159 - 173, n=4)
168 Points ∼92% +6%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
164 Points ∼90% +3%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
159 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
156 Points ∼86% -2%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
154 Points ∼85% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 362, n=284)
111 Points ∼61% -30%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
86 Points ∼47% -46%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
69 Points ∼100% +19%
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 161, n=63)
63.6 Points ∼92% +10%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
63 Points ∼91% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (58 - 63, n=3)
60.7 Points ∼88% +5%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
58 Points ∼84%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
55 Points ∼80% -5%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
54 Points ∼78% -7%

* ... smaller is better

BQ Aquaris X2 ProBQ Aquaris X ProNokia 7 PlusSamsung Galaxy A8 2018Motorola Moto Z3 PlayAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-18%
7%
2%
75%
-3%
-25%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
49.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-19%
62.31
2%
62.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
62.7
3%
54.3 (14.1 - 74.7, n=68)
-11%
45.5 (3.4 - 87.1, n=318)
-26%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.35 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
78.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-6%
82.21
-1%
77.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
83.7
0%
73.2 (21.1 - 86.9, n=68)
-12%
63.8 (8.2 - 96.5, n=318)
-23%
Random Write 4KB
15.43
12.07
-22%
19.62
27%
14.69
-5%
84.1
445%
19.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=77)
28%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=607)
4%
Random Read 4KB
51.25
37.97
-26%
54.65
7%
82.62
61%
60.6
18%
50.4 (11.4 - 149, n=77)
-2%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=607)
-25%
Sequential Write 256KB
204.83
139.63
-32%
211.6
3%
104.2
-49%
182.5
-11%
165 (40 - 246, n=77)
-19%
79.9 (2.99 - 246, n=607)
-61%
Sequential Read 256KB
280.78
270.46
-4%
283.12
1%
299.94
7%
271.7
-3%
271 (115 - 704, n=77)
-3%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=607)
-18%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InställningarVärde
 high30 fps
PUBG Mobile
 InställningarVärde
 HD30 fps
Hög belastning
 40.1 °C39.1 °C39.9 °C 
 39.9 °C39 °C38.9 °C 
 39.5 °C37.5 °C37.2 °C 
Max: 40.1 °C
Medel: 39 °C
35.8 °C38.6 °C39.1 °C
35.9 °C37.8 °C37.3 °C
35.4 °C37.3 °C37.4 °C
Max: 39.1 °C
Medel: 37.2 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  30.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 20.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.929.52528.437.73136.130.54030.929.25030.6326322.225.68024.922.310024.422.712523.52716020.327.720019.845.725018.249.231517.458.240016.661.950017.16263015.961.380015.957.1100015.963.6125016.773.316001674.5200015.970.9250016.272.8315016.471.540001774.1500016.573.3630016.468.4800016.665.6100001765.31250016.5571600016.949.2SPL28.683.2N1.151.8median 16.6median 62Delta1.69.835.244.432.941.737.232.531.737.339.641.828.335.827.335.926.934.126.7362439.920.944.820.952.219.550.118.554.117.564.817.561.815.769.215.873.816.675.115.874.115.474.115.574.71675.915.8741672.216.374.316.371.916.268.216.456.416.452.128.685.31.161.3median 16.4median 68.22.111.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseBQ Aquaris X2 ProNokia 7 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Nokia 7 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.13 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.63 / 2.16 / 2.18 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.48 / 7.87 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
3100 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
11%
4%
-14%
27%
-7%
5%
Idle Minimum *
0.63
0.67
-6%
0.65
-3%
1.3
-106%
0.67
-6%
0.738 (0.56 - 1.2, n=5)
-17%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=636)
-40%
Idle Average *
2.16
1.7
21%
1.76
19%
2
7%
1.02
53%
1.914 (1.51 - 2.2, n=5)
11%
1.719 (0.6 - 6.2, n=635)
20%
Idle Maximum *
2.18
1.78
18%
1.78
18%
2.7
-24%
1.1
50%
2.31 (1.54 - 4.1, n=5)
-6%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=636)
8%
Load Average *
4.48
4.42
1%
4.47
-0%
3.7
17%
3.86
14%
5.15 (3.94 - 8.2, n=5)
-15%
4.04 (0.8 - 10.8, n=630)
10%
Load Maximum *
7.87
6.3
20%
9.13
-16%
5.1
35%
5.97
24%
8.6 (5.93 - 12.2, n=5)
-9%
5.75 (1.2 - 14.2, n=630)
27%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
22tim 54min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 67)
10tim 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10tim 58min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 25min
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
3100 mAh
Honor 10
3400 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
3000 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2
3100 mAh
Battery Runtime
11%
32%
6%
13%
34%
2%
Reader / Idle
1374
1162
-15%
1840
34%
1245
-9%
1703
24%
1546
13%
H.264
658
662
1%
644
-2%
648
-2%
706
7%
908
38%
WiFi v1.3
605
663
10%
730
21%
595
-2%
672
11%
646
7%
617
2%
Load
145
216
49%
254
75%
199
37%
158
9%
260
79%

För

+ ljusstark LTPS-skärm
+ snabb SoC
+ utökningsbar lagring
+ Android One
+ USB 3.1 med bildutmatning
+ exakt positionering
+ bra dualkamera
+ stöd för QC4
+ snabbt WiFi

Emot

- skärmen kunde haft exaktare färger
- varken VoLTE eller VoWiFi
- ej stöd för särskilt många LTE-frekvenser
- konstruktionskvaliteten är inte perfekt
- Hybrid-SIM (ej fullfjädrad Dual-SIM)
Recenseras: BQ Aquaris X2 Pro. Recensionsex från BQ Germany.
Recenseras: BQ Aquaris X2 Pro. Recensionsex från BQ Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

BQ har valt att göra dom två modellerna i sin nya X2-serie mer lika varandra och har utrustat båda med samma kameror. Således ligger dom enda skillnaderna i höljets material, lagringen och minnet samt processorn. Om du jämför dom två versionerna med 64 GB så är den enda märkbara skillnaden vilket material telefonens baksida är tillverkat av, dess SoC och 500 kronor. I slutändan är det upp till användaren - alternativen är glas eller plast. Om du då inte även förväntar dig att din smartphone ska kunna spela krävande spel. I så fall behöver du välja Pro-versionen. För vår del anser vi att den extra kostnaden på runt 1.200 kronor är en aning för högt för större minne (6 GB RAM) och mer intern lagring (128 GB) - vi är inte säkra på att Pro-versionen kommer bli framgångsrik.

Aquaris X2 Pro är en lyckad uppdatering av BQ:s allra dyraste smartphone, men den får stå ut med en del kritik.

X2 Pro imponerade på oss med sina funktioner, en ljusstark skärm, långa batteritider och bra kameror. Den nya dualkamera-modulen tar utmärkta foton - det är bara synd att den inte längre använder Samsungs topp-sensor. Hade BQ inte gjort den ändringen hade kamerorna kanske varit ännu bättre. Tillverkaren kunde också ha lagt till möjligheten att välja en mer naturlig färgåtergivning på skärmen. 

Vi var väldigt nöjda med BQ Aquaris X2 Pros samtalskvalitet. Det är synd att överföringen är begränsad till LTE Cat. 6, men det kan vi ändå leva med. Däremot kan vi inte förstå varför en Europeisk tillverkare inte stödjer alla frekvensband som används i EU och varför VoLTE och VoWiFi inte stöds redan när telefonen släpps. Vi hade även förväntat oss några fler grundläggande frekvensband från utanför Europa.

BQ Aquaris X2 Pro - 07/26/2018 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Design
83%
Tangentbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Mus
92%
Anslutningar
58 / 60 → 97%
Vikt
91%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
85%
Spelprestanda
54 / 63 → 85%
Programprestanda
60 / 70 → 85%
Temperatur
88%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 82%
Camera
73%
Medel
78%
86%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, 2018-07-29 (Update: 2018-07-29)