Notebookcheck

Test: Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Marcus Herbrich, Tanja Hinum-Balaz (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 10/05/2018

Efter 6 kommer 8. Xiaomis senaste angrepp mot smartphone-eliten heter Mi 8 Explorer Edition. På papperet är detta billiga flaggskepp ett komplett erbjudande till ett rimligt pris. I den här recensionen kommer vi att fastställa de många styrkor Mi 8 Explorer Edition har, men även utreda vilka svagheter som reflekteras i det låga priset.

Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Mi Serie)
Minne
6144 MB 
Skärm
6.2 tum 18.7:9, 2248 x 1080 pixlar 402 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 109 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: USB Typ C, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Infraröd, Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, Barometer, Kompass, USB Typ C, USB On-The-Go (OTG), Miracast, Status-LED, Face Unlock, VoLTE
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: B2, B3, B5, B8. CDMA: 1x EVDO BC0. WCDMA: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8. TD-SCDMA: B34, B39. TD-LTE: B34, B38, B39, B40, B41; 120 MHz. FDD-LTE: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B17, B20. LTE: B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.6 x 154.9 x 74.8
Batteri
3000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix Dual-kamera: 12 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.55”, 1.4 μm, 4 axlar, dual-pixel. 12 MP f/2.4, 1/3.4”, 1.0 μm, 2x optisk zoom
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.0, 0.9 μm
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, 1 x OVP, 1 x USB Typ A till Typ C-kabel, 1x Kinesisk laddare och EU-adapter, 1 x USB Typ C till 3.5 mm adapter, 1 x Silikonfodral, MIUI 10, 12 Månader Garanti, SAR-värde: Huvud - 0.7 W/kg, Kropp – 1.66 W/kg, fanless
Vikt
175 g, Strömförsörjning: 58 g
Pris
380 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
654 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Huawei P20
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
637 MBit/s ∼97% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 MBit/s ∼94%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
609 MBit/s ∼93% -1%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
579 MBit/s ∼89% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 6
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
574 MBit/s ∼88% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=270)
196 MBit/s ∼30% -68%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
116 MBit/s ∼18% -81%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
668 MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 MBit/s ∼92%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
612 MBit/s ∼92% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
573 MBit/s ∼86% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼78% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 6
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
500 MBit/s ∼75% -19%
Huawei P20
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
397 MBit/s ∼59% -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=270)
191 MBit/s ∼29% -69%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
117 MBit/s ∼18% -81%
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Slinga
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Slinga
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Skogsområde
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Skogsområde
GPS-test: Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition - Slinga
GPS-test: Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition - Slinga
GPS-test: Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition – Översikt
GPS-test: Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition – Översikt
GPS-test: Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition – Skogsområde
GPS-test: Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition – Skogsområde
Normalt läge
Normalt läge
HDR-läge
HDR-läge
HDR-läge med AI
HDR-läge med AI
2x optisk zoom
2x optisk zoom
Bokeh-effekt
Bokeh-effekt

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Foto av vår testkarta
Foto av vår testkarta
Testkarta i detalj
425
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
460
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 460 cd/m² Medel: 431.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 429 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.39 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.238
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Super AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2
Xiaomi Mi 6
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Xiaomi Black Shark
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Huawei P20
LTPS, 2240x1080, 5.8
OnePlus 6
Optic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.28
HTC U12 Plus
Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6
Samsung Galaxy S9
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8
Screen
-15%
-37%
-0%
54%
12%
24%
32%
Brightness middle
429
620
45%
549
28%
492
15%
753
76%
430
0%
395
-8%
529
23%
Brightness
432
586
36%
541
25%
463
7%
748
73%
437
1%
402
-7%
527
22%
Brightness Distribution
88
89
1%
95
8%
90
2%
96
9%
87
-1%
90
2%
96
9%
Black Level *
0.28
0.42
0.59
0.37
0.37
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.39
4.8
-42%
6.08
-79%
2.4
29%
1.3
62%
2.3
32%
1.6
53%
1.4
59%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.25
8.8
-68%
10.69
-104%
6.2
-18%
2.3
56%
4.6
12%
3.4
35%
4
24%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.3
5.3
-61%
6.6
-100%
4.5
-36%
1.7
48%
2.4
27%
1.1
67%
1.6
52%
Gamma
2.238 98%
2.25 98%
2.305 95%
2.25 98%
2.18 101%
2.28 96%
2.14 103%
2.16 102%
CCT
7135 91%
7473 87%
8399 77%
6395 102%
66.76 9736%
6160 106%
6536 99%
6358 102%
Contrast
2214
1307
834
2035
1068

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 100 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8754 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.2 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
232931 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 6
181909 Points ∼78% -22%
Xiaomi Black Shark
230642 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
162183 Points ∼70% -30%
Huawei P20
179393 Points ∼77% -23%
OnePlus 6
230421 Points ∼99% -1%
HTC U12 Plus
221971 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9
217950 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 232931, n=11)
221422 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 232931, n=359)
72132 Points ∼31% -69%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
288062 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Black Shark
290397 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
266601 Points ∼92% -7%
Huawei P20
200756 Points ∼69% -30%
OnePlus 6
266686 Points ∼92% -7%
HTC U12 Plus
255739 Points ∼88% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S9
243861 Points ∼84% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 290397, n=14)
268351 Points ∼92% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=140)
108924 Points ∼38% -62%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
7360 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 6
6686 Points ∼78% -9%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8309 Points ∼97% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
8078 Points ∼94% +10%
Huawei P20
7002 Points ∼81% -5%
OnePlus 6
8282 Points ∼96% +13%
HTC U12 Plus
8601 Points ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S9
5291 Points ∼62% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7360 - 8601, n=14)
8107 Points ∼94% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 8601, n=228)
4409 Points ∼51% -40%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
8967 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Mi 6
7548 Points ∼74% -16%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
9179 Points ∼89% +2%
Huawei P20
8700 Points ∼85% -3%
OnePlus 6
9630 Points ∼94% +7%
HTC U12 Plus
10264 Points ∼100% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S9
5736 Points ∼56% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 10571, n=12)
9542 Points ∼93% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (4147 - 10571, n=391)
4748 Points ∼46% -47%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
1288 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 6
1263 Points ∼88% -2%
Xiaomi Black Shark
1243 Points ∼86% -3%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
1234 Points ∼86% -4%
Huawei P20
1313 Points ∼91% +2%
OnePlus 6
1386 Points ∼96% +8%
HTC U12 Plus
1437 Points ∼100% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S9
1099 Points ∼76% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1009 - 1613, n=13)
1356 Points ∼94% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=468)
679 Points ∼47% -47%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
7965 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 6
6206 Points ∼78% -22%
Xiaomi Black Shark
5846 Points ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
7918 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P20
3697 Points ∼46% -54%
OnePlus 6
7949 Points ∼100% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
7945 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9
6373 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5846 - 7965, n=13)
7736 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15875, n=468)
1620 Points ∼20% -80%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3521 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi 6
4054 Points ∼98% +15%
Xiaomi Black Shark
2871 Points ∼69% -18%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3012 Points ∼73% -14%
Huawei P20
4154 Points ∼100% +18%
OnePlus 6
3799 Points ∼91% +8%
HTC U12 Plus
3641 Points ∼88% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2669 Points ∼64% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 4798, n=13)
3442 Points ∼83% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=468)
1161 Points ∼28% -67%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
6556 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 6
5857 Points ∼71% -11%
Xiaomi Black Shark
7105 Points ∼86% +8%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
5792 Points ∼70% -12%
Huawei P20
5797 Points ∼70% -12%
OnePlus 6
8228 Points ∼100% +26%
HTC U12 Plus
7862 Points ∼96% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S9
6234 Points ∼76% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5792 - 8435, n=13)
7672 Points ∼93% +17%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=468)
2357 Points ∼29% -64%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3923 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 6
3694 Points ∼86% -6%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3489 Points ∼81% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3614 Points ∼84% -8%
Huawei P20
3288 Points ∼76% -16%
OnePlus 6
4308 Points ∼100% +10%
HTC U12 Plus
4252 Points ∼99% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3285 Points ∼76% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3489 - 4478, n=13)
4056 Points ∼94% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=472)
1180 Points ∼27% -70%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
14299 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark
13620 Points ∼95% -5%
HTC U12 Plus
12493 Points ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S9
6219 Points ∼43% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (12493 - 14417, n=11)
13859 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14417, n=165)
4105 Points ∼29% -71%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
8548 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 6
6714 Points ∼75% -21%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8453 Points ∼95% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
8937 Points ∼100% +5%
Huawei P20
6557 Points ∼73% -23%
HTC U12 Plus
8812 Points ∼99% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9
8786 Points ∼98% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (8437 - 9182, n=13)
8763 Points ∼98% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 11598, n=215)
4113 Points ∼46% -52%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2441 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi 6
1938 Points ∼53% -21%
Xiaomi Black Shark
2437 Points ∼66% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
2456 Points ∼67% +1%
Huawei P20
1886 Points ∼51% -23%
HTC U12 Plus
2429 Points ∼66% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3688 Points ∼100% +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2425 - 2468, n=13)
2449 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=216)
1213 Points ∼33% -50%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2118 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi 6
3007 Points ∼88% +42%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3408 Points ∼99% +61%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
2606 Points ∼76% +23%
Huawei P20
2795 Points ∼81% +32%
OnePlus 6
3432 Points ∼100% +62%
HTC U12 Plus
3197 Points ∼93% +51%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2486 Points ∼72% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3669, n=13)
3200 Points ∼93% +51%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 3669, n=320)
1571 Points ∼46% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3742 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 6
4072 Points ∼78% +9%
Xiaomi Black Shark
5220 Points ∼100% +39%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
5181 Points ∼99% +38%
Huawei P20
3040 Points ∼58% -19%
OnePlus 6
5212 Points ∼100% +39%
HTC U12 Plus
3488 Points ∼67% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3553 Points ∼68% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5220, n=13)
4888 Points ∼94% +31%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5220, n=320)
1100 Points ∼21% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3197 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Mi 6
3775 Points ∼81% +18%
Xiaomi Black Shark
4668 Points ∼100% +46%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
4248 Points ∼91% +33%
Huawei P20
2982 Points ∼64% -7%
OnePlus 6
4673 Points ∼100% +46%
HTC U12 Plus
3419 Points ∼73% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3244 Points ∼69% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=13)
4358 Points ∼93% +36%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=328)
1052 Points ∼23% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2176 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Mi 6
2921 Points ∼85% +34%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3443 Points ∼100% +58%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
2159 Points ∼63% -1%
Huawei P20
2811 Points ∼81% +29%
OnePlus 6
3452 Points ∼100% +59%
HTC U12 Plus
2774 Points ∼80% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2600 Points ∼75% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2159 - 3642, n=13)
2986 Points ∼87% +37%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 3642, n=351)
1470 Points ∼43% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
6554 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Mi 6
6231 Points ∼75% -5%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8312 Points ∼100% +27%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
6630 Points ∼80% +1%
Huawei P20
3550 Points ∼43% -46%
OnePlus 6
8252 Points ∼99% +26%
HTC U12 Plus
5637 Points ∼68% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S9
4569 Points ∼55% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=13)
7720 Points ∼93% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (104 - 8312, n=351)
1497 Points ∼18% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
4529 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 6
4978 Points ∼79% +10%
Xiaomi Black Shark
6324 Points ∼100% +40%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
4540 Points ∼72% 0%
Huawei P20
3354 Points ∼53% -26%
OnePlus 6
6304 Points ∼100% +39%
HTC U12 Plus
4585 Points ∼73% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3911 Points ∼62% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4529 - 6378, n=13)
5683 Points ∼90% +25%
Average of class Smartphone (127 - 6378, n=359)
1277 Points ∼20% -72%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
30765 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 6
20330 Points ∼59% -34%
Xiaomi Black Shark
31384 Points ∼92% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
30245 Points ∼88% -2%
Huawei P20
23046 Points ∼67% -25%
OnePlus 6
34191 Points ∼100% +11%
HTC U12 Plus
33810 Points ∼99% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S9
26851 Points ∼79% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (27817 - 36762, n=13)
33616 Points ∼98% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (7095 - 36762, n=506)
12397 Points ∼36% -60%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
77003 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 6
58228 Points ∼71% -24%
Xiaomi Black Shark
82423 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
76078 Points ∼92% -1%
Huawei P20
34146 Points ∼41% -56%
OnePlus 6
81269 Points ∼99% +6%
HTC U12 Plus
81726 Points ∼99% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9
48433 Points ∼59% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (76078 - 84681, n=13)
80584 Points ∼98% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 160199, n=506)
16673 Points ∼20% -78%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
57711 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 6
41172 Points ∼66% -29%
Xiaomi Black Shark
60543 Points ∼97% +5%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
56913 Points ∼91% -1%
Huawei P20
30845 Points ∼50% -47%
OnePlus 6
62241 Points ∼100% +8%
HTC U12 Plus
62152 Points ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S9
41093 Points ∼66% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (56669 - 64592, n=13)
61413 Points ∼99% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=507)
14140 Points ∼23% -75%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
102 fps ∼68%
Xiaomi Mi 6
119 fps ∼79% +17%
Xiaomi Black Shark
151 fps ∼100% +48%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
150 fps ∼99% +47%
Huawei P20
125 fps ∼83% +23%
OnePlus 6
150 fps ∼99% +47%
HTC U12 Plus
98 fps ∼65% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9
144 fps ∼95% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 151, n=14)
143 fps ∼95% +40%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=532)
29.1 fps ∼19% -71%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
58 fps ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 6
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Black Shark
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Huawei P20
59 fps ∼98% +2%
OnePlus 6
60 fps ∼100% +3%
HTC U12 Plus
59 fps ∼98% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 60, n=13)
59.8 fps ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=535)
24.1 fps ∼40% -58%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
54 fps ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi 6
63 fps ∼77% +17%
Xiaomi Black Shark
82 fps ∼100% +52%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
74 fps ∼90% +37%
Huawei P20
59 fps ∼72% +9%
OnePlus 6
66 fps ∼80% +22%
HTC U12 Plus
72 fps ∼88% +33%
Samsung Galaxy S9
73 fps ∼89% +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=13)
73.5 fps ∼90% +36%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 115, n=454)
15.5 fps ∼19% -71%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
51 fps ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 6
56 fps ∼95% +10%
Xiaomi Black Shark
59 fps ∼100% +16%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
59 fps ∼100% +16%
Huawei P20
56 fps ∼95% +10%
OnePlus 6
58 fps ∼98% +14%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼59% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S9
45 fps ∼76% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (35 - 59, n=13)
54.6 fps ∼93% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (4.4 - 115, n=457)
15.2 fps ∼26% -70%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
32 fps ∼53%
Xiaomi Mi 6
43 fps ∼72% +34%
Xiaomi Black Shark
60 fps ∼100% +88%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
60 fps ∼100% +88%
Huawei P20
39 fps ∼65% +22%
OnePlus 6
56 fps ∼93% +75%
HTC U12 Plus
39 fps ∼65% +22%
Samsung Galaxy S9
46 fps ∼77% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 60.9, n=14)
53.6 fps ∼89% +68%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 69.3, n=319)
13.3 fps ∼22% -58%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
29 fps ∼53%
Xiaomi Mi 6
42 fps ∼76% +45%
Xiaomi Black Shark
53 fps ∼96% +83%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
55 fps ∼100% +90%
Huawei P20
39 fps ∼71% +34%
OnePlus 6
54 fps ∼98% +86%
HTC U12 Plus
31 fps ∼56% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9
24 fps ∼44% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (26 - 56, n=13)
48.2 fps ∼88% +66%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=321)
13.2 fps ∼24% -54%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
25 fps ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi 6
26 fps ∼74% +4%
Xiaomi Black Shark
35 fps ∼100% +40%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
35 fps ∼100% +40%
Huawei P20
23 fps ∼66% -8%
OnePlus 6
35 fps ∼100% +40%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼100% +40%
Samsung Galaxy S9
28 fps ∼80% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=13)
34.1 fps ∼97% +36%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 40, n=250)
9.13 fps ∼26% -63%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
24 fps ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi 6
26 fps ∼76% +8%
Xiaomi Black Shark
31 fps ∼91% +29%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
34 fps ∼100% +42%
Huawei P20
23 fps ∼68% -4%
OnePlus 6
32 fps ∼94% +33%
HTC U12 Plus
20 fps ∼59% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S9
14 fps ∼41% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (17 - 37, n=13)
29.9 fps ∼88% +25%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 50, n=253)
8.33 fps ∼25% -65%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P20 HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U12 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
87.695 Points ∼100% +8%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
87.036 Points ∼99% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
80.876 Points ∼92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 89.5, n=14)
73.2 Points ∼83% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)
70.453 Points ∼80% -13%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
69.765 Points ∼80% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
67.721 Points ∼77% -16%
Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126)
56.188 Points ∼64% -31%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=389)
35.1 Points ∼40% -57%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Points ∼0% -100%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
17026 Points ∼100% +16%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
16285 Points ∼96% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
15233 Points ∼89% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 17131, n=14)
14849 Points ∼87% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
14617 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
14491 Points ∼85% -1%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
13663 Points ∼80% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)
11909 Points ∼70% -19%
Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126)
11468 Points ∼67% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=525)
5241 Points ∼31% -64%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=544)
11769 ms * ∼100% -408%
Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126)
3978.9 ms * ∼34% -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2264 - 11204, n=14)
3120 ms * ∼27% -35%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
2868 ms * ∼24% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58)
2667.5 ms * ∼23% -15%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
2445 ms * ∼21% -6%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
2409.6 ms * ∼20% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
2316.8 ms * ∼20%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
2287 ms * ∼19% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2077.8 ms * ∼18% +10%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
257 Points ∼100% +2%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
252 Points ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
251 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
246 Points ∼96% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (96 - 291, n=14)
237 Points ∼92% -6%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
228 Points ∼89% -9%
Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126)
182 Points ∼71% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
163 Points ∼63% -35%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=261)
105 Points ∼41% -58%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer EditionXiaomi Mi 6Xiaomi Black SharkXiaomi Mi Mix 2SHuawei P20OnePlus 6HTC U12 PlusSamsung Galaxy S9Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
5%
101%
119%
159%
0%
86%
5%
86%
-61%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
61 (51.3 - 66.7, n=3)
44.2 (3.4 - 87.1, n=294)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77.8 (75.4 - 81, n=3)
62.6 (8.2 - 96.5, n=294)
Random Write 4KB
22.65
25.19
11%
114.1
404%
128.36
467%
161.49
613%
21.8
-4%
104.24
360%
23.07
2%
98.4 (20 - 164, n=12)
334%
14.2 (0.14 - 164, n=576)
-37%
Random Read 4KB
135.21
143.49
6%
127.2
-6%
135.14
0%
147.04
9%
137
1%
118.14
-13%
131
-3%
139 (132 - 147, n=12)
3%
35.8 (1.59 - 173, n=576)
-74%
Sequential Write 256KB
205.23
196.7
-4%
199.6
-3%
208.1
1%
193.56
-6%
201.4
-2%
195.82
-5%
206.94
1%
202 (192 - 212, n=12)
-2%
74.9 (2.99 - 228, n=576)
-64%
Sequential Read 256KB
691.65
728.2
5%
741.5
7%
756.07
9%
826.76
20%
725.6
5%
709.11
3%
815.43
18%
764 (692 - 832, n=12)
10%
218 (12.1 - 895, n=576)
-68%
Asphalt 9: Legends
 InställningarVärde
 High Quality30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
PUBG Mobile
 InställningarVärde
 HD30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Hög belastning
 43.7 °C40.3 °C38.8 °C 
 44.1 °C40.3 °C39.5 °C 
 43.3 °C40.3 °C39 °C 
Max: 44.1 °C
Medel: 41 °C
37.8 °C39.5 °C40.7 °C
36.6 °C38.6 °C42.8 °C
36.9 °C38.9 °C41.8 °C
Max: 42.8 °C
Medel: 39.3 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  42.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.727.92533.935.63147.6504031.234.6503837.56327.128.38027.129.410024.627.312520.634.316018.840.920018.546.425017.749.73151752.240016.55950016.961.163014.463.78001468.3100013.567.5125013.765.9160013.967.3200012.767.8250012.770.1315012.769.4400012.566.6500011.963630011.461.6800011.564.41000011.664.11250011.552.81600011.442.5SPL70.167.725.778.7N25.721.20.743median 13.7Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Editionmedian 63Delta2.58.622.924.324.224.125.12522.230.227.739.917.420.717.517.214.918.61419.514.732.112.243.413.649.513.153.910.857.29.754.29.357.19.6628.2668.168.1869.97.771.37.875.17.874.47.869.47.864.47.857.48.159.78.157.98.147.98.129.257.920.681.69.90.343.5median 8.1OnePlus 6median 57.42.211hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.6 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.8 / 2.9 / 3.5 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.8 / 11.2 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 6
3350 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3400 mAh
Huawei P20
3400 mAh
OnePlus 6
3300 mAh
HTC U12 Plus
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
42%
30%
25%
26%
44%
20%
53%
29%
40%
Idle Minimum *
1.8
0.45
75%
0.8
56%
0.75
58%
0.67
63%
0.6
67%
0.77
57%
0.65
64%
0.84 (0.42 - 1.8, n=11)
53%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=604)
51%
Idle Average *
2.9
1.67
42%
1.5
48%
2.25
22%
2.05
29%
1
66%
2.18
25%
0.81
72%
1.957 (1 - 2.9, n=11)
33%
1.717 (0.6 - 6.2, n=603)
41%
Idle Maximum *
3.5
1.69
52%
2.3
34%
2.26
35%
2.11
40%
1.6
54%
2.21
37%
0.92
74%
2.18 (1.57 - 3.5, n=11)
38%
1.988 (0.74 - 6.6, n=604)
43%
Load Average *
4.8
4.07
15%
4.8
-0%
4.89
-2%
6.15
-28%
4.3
10%
6.25
-30%
4.76
1%
4.67 (3.7 - 6.25, n=11)
3%
4.02 (0.8 - 10.8, n=598)
16%
Load Maximum *
11.2
8.54
24%
10.1
10%
9.6
14%
8.09
28%
8.6
23%
10.16
9%
5.16
54%
9.04 (6.87 - 11.2, n=11)
19%
5.68 (1.2 - 14.2, n=598)
49%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
23tim 21min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11tim 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15tim 21min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
3tim 11min
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 6
3350 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3400 mAh
Huawei P20
3400 mAh
OnePlus 6
3300 mAh
HTC U12 Plus
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
6%
10%
7%
24%
14%
-13%
-24%
Reader / Idle
1401
1753
25%
1678
20%
1888
35%
1806
29%
1452
4%
1182
-16%
H.264
921
747
-19%
718
-22%
810
-12%
791
-14%
464
-50%
609
-34%
WiFi v1.3
694
739
6%
711
2%
716
3%
818
18%
762
10%
507
-27%
474
-32%
Load
191
253
32%
239
25%
295
54%
246
29%
230
20%
164
-14%

För

+ massor av minne – 128 GB ROM, 8 GB RAM
+ lyxigt hantverk och känsla
+ slående design (Explorer Edition)
+ OLED-skärm
+ LTE Band 20
+ bra prestanda
+ snabba biometriska upplåsningsfunktioner (Mi 8)

Emot

- MIUI och GPS behöver mjukvaru-optimering
- högtalare
- höga yttemperaturer
- Explorer Edition har sämre batteritid än genomsnittet vid ihållande belastning
- USB 2.0
Recension av Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition. Recensionsex från TradingShenzhen.com
Recension av Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition. Recensionsex från TradingShenzhen.com

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Xiaomi har skapat en av årets mest prisvärda smartphone-modeller, något vi inte hade förväntat oss med tanke på tidigare Mi-enheter. Vi skulle till och med rekommendera att uppgradera från Mi 6, så mycket förbättringar och förfiningar har Mi 8.

Om du ställs inför frågan om vilken version av Mi 8 du bör välja är vårt svar tydligt: Välj den vanliga Mi 8, särskilt då den för tillfället är 2.000 kronor billigare. Även om vi bortser från prisskillnaden är Mi 8 den bättre telefonen tack vare överlägsen batteritid och en pålitligare fingeravtrycksläsare. Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition kommer få omgivningen att reagera med sin slående baksida, 2 GB extra RAM och innovativa biometriska tekniker. De sistnämnda är dock inte snabbare än de mer traditionella motsvarigheterna som Mi 8 använder.

Du kan inte misslyckas med Xiaomi Mi 8, men det är inte årets bästa smartphone.

Oavsett om det rör Explorer Edition eller inte är Mi 8 en imponerande och lyxig smartphone. Men enheten saknar en del för att vara en toppskiktstelefon från 2018. Kamerorna, högtalarna, mjukvaran, GPS-mottagaren och avsaknaden av både IP-certifiering och trådlös laddning skiljer Mi 8 Explorer Edition från dyrare flaggskeppsenheter. Detta är acceptabelt med tanke på vad Explorer Edition kostar, särskilt då Xiaomi har gjort mycket rätt med denna enhet.

Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition - 09/24/2018 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Design
87%
Tangentbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Mus
94%
Anslutningar
49 / 60 → 81%
Vikt
90%
Batteri
94%
Skärm
86%
Spelprestanda
64 / 63 → 100%
Programprestanda
73 / 70 → 100%
Temperatur
86%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
67 / 91 → 74%
Camera
80%
Medel
80%
88%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Marcus Herbrich, 2018-10- 5 (Update: 2018-10- 9)