Notebookcheck

Test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S - Billig vatten- och dammskyddad Android-telefon (Sammanfattning)

IP53-certifierad. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S är en billig IP-certifierad smartphone. Redmi Note 10S kostar ungefär lika mycket som föregångaren Redmi Note 9S men har aningen bättre hårdvara. Läs vår recension för att få reda på hur vi upplever Redmi Note 10S.
Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Redmi Note Serie)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G95 8 x 2 - 2.1 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G76 MP4
Minne
6144 MB 
Skärm
6.43 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 409 PPI, Kapacitiv, AMOLED, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm kombinerad ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD (FAT, FAT32), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Närhetssensor, Accelerometer, Gyroskop, e-kompass, OTG, IR-Sändare
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G GSM (850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz), 3G WCDMA (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G LTE FDD/TDD (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.29 x 160.46 x 74.5
Batteri
5000 mAh Litiumjon
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix Huvudkamera (1.97", 0.7 μm, f/1.79), 8 MP ultra-vidvinkel (118°, f/2.2), 2 MP makro (f/2.4), 2 MP djup (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.45)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Nätadapter, USB-C kabel, Skyddsfodral, Sim-verktyg, MIUI 12.5, 12 Månader Garanti, SAR (Huvud): 0.599 W/kg, SAR (Kropp): 0.904 W/kg, IP53, Camera2 API: Level 3, SNR: 91,42 dBFS, fanless
Vikt
178.8 g, Strömförsörjning: 112 g
Pris
280 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
sökrelation
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81 %
06/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4
178.8 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080
81 %
05/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
SD 720G, Adreno 618
209 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
81 %
04/2021
realme 8
Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4
177 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.40"2400x1080
79 %
05/2021
Oppo A74
SD 662, Adreno 610
175 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
85 %
06/2021
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
SD 860, Adreno 640
215 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S

Storleksjämförelse

165.3 mm 76.8 mm 9.4 mm 215 g165.8 mm 76.7 mm 8.8 mm 209 g160.46 mm 74.5 mm 8.29 mm 178.8 g160.6 mm 73.9 mm 8 mm 177 g160.3 mm 73.8 mm 7.95 mm 175 g
SDCardreader Transfer Speed - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Oppo A74
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
36.62 MB/s ∼100% +95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18.76 MB/s ∼51%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
15.75 MB/s ∼43% -16%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580854949.749.950.74650.949.341.536.744.243.741.441.541.742.44041.139.338.242.940.735.44240.942.642.242.337.937.941.642.4404342.841.339.74238.935.540.941.142.843.636.842.242.943.635.842.341.341.640.141.542.241.740.237.242.238.643.339.741.742.241.641.737.240.239.344.243.642.14040.842.742.43646.943.543.246.245.243.345.344.238.840.54344.144.943.54145.240.744.540.342.845.639.943.443.745.543.644.544.235.944.846.644.840.943.242.64544.246.637.646464543.244.945.146.642.739.145.743.842.341.64949.749.950.74650.949.341.536.744.243.741.441.541.742.44041.139.338.242.940.735.44240.942.642.242.337.937.941.642.4404342.841.339.74238.935.540.941.142.843.636.842.242.943.635.842.341.341.640.141.542.241.740.237.242.238.643.339.741.742.241.641.737.240.239.344.243.642.14040.842.742.43646.943.543.246.245.243.345.344.238.840.54344.144.943.54145.240.744.540.342.845.639.943.443.745.543.644.544.235.944.846.644.840.943.242.64544.246.637.646464543.244.945.146.642.739.145.743.842.341.650.785.585.185.285.382.685.585.584.785.284.985.585.585.484.985.28380.285.284.885.58585.285.485.285.186.385.284.685.585.985.185.884.385.884.585.684.785.384.985.485.385.18584.885.284.685.785.585.385.584.485.285.685.284.785.685.385.384.984.285.985.284.985.984.58585.384.7858585.685.385.484.58585.685.384.885.18685.285.384.884.786.384.882.787.784.785.585.584.385.984.786.184.984.785.685.685.384.885.58585.185.684.685.385.585.784.985.185.685.985.184.985.284.885.484.984.885.985.583.584.784.985.689.2Tooltip
; Sequential write; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø42.4 (35.4-50.9)
; Sequential read; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø84.9 (50.7-89.2)
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
652 (326min - 669max) MBit/s ∼100% +130%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=305, last 2 years)
415 MBit/s ∼64% +47%
realme 8
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
346 (317min - 353max) MBit/s ∼53% +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
283 (145min - 322max) MBit/s ∼43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
256 (247min - 263max) MBit/s ∼39% -10%
Oppo A74
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
249 (155min - 290max) MBit/s ∼38% -12%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
486 (425min - 550max) MBit/s ∼100% +52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=305, last 2 years)
419 MBit/s ∼86% +31%
realme 8
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
335 (281min - 350max) MBit/s ∼69% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
320 (299min - 340max) MBit/s ∼66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
286 (225min - 321max) MBit/s ∼59% -11%
Oppo A74
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
276 (170min - 314max) MBit/s ∼57% -14%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320311324306309309324318331331324339339319327321305321332311300321316334301310321308340299329311324306309309324318331331324339339319327321305321332311300321316334301310321308340299329293289292295286293145289290294291291291294245322180284293294291294293298295289298293291282Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (299-340)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø283 (145-322)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S - Navigering
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S - Navigering
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S - Navigering
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S - Navigering
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S - Navigering
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S - Navigering

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Close-up shotPanoramic shotUltra wide-angle shot5X zoomLow-light shot
click to load images
ColorChecker
2.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S: 6.84 ∆E min: 2.27 - max: 11.4 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.9 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
43.9 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
34 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
65.4 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
48.3 ∆E
37 ∆E
76.1 ∆E
43 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
91 ∆E
70.3 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S: 46.44 ∆E min: 13.76 - max: 91.04 ∆E
700
cd/m²
700
cd/m²
702
cd/m²
693
cd/m²
706
cd/m²
706
cd/m²
701
cd/m²
697
cd/m²
700
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Max: 706 cd/m² Medel: 700.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.63 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 98 %
Mitt på batteriet: 706 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
91.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
realme 8
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Oppo A74
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
-62%
-27%
-41%
7%
Brightness middle
706
622
-12%
590
-16%
606
-14%
567
-20%
Brightness
701
612
-13%
607
-13%
606
-14%
524
-25%
Brightness Distribution
98
94
-4%
92
-6%
98
0%
87
-11%
Black Level *
0.56
0.57
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.1
3.98
-90%
2.64
-26%
3.6
-71%
1
52%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.9
7.33
-50%
6.85
-40%
6.2
-27%
2.1
57%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.5
4.5
-200%
2.4
-60%
3.3
-120%
1.7
-13%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.206 100%
2.265 97%
2.31 95%
2.16 102%
CCT
6447 101%
7361 88%
6913 94%
6704 97%
6343 102%
Contrast
1111
995
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
114.9

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz ≤ 57 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 57 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 14793 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 2.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.1 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
507 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
559 Points ∼77% +10%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
532 Points ∼73% +5%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
305 Points ∼42% -40%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
728 Points ∼100% +44%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (506 - 532, n=4)
514 Points ∼71% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=235, last 2 years)
565 Points ∼78% +11%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1685 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1690 Points ∼64% 0%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1689 Points ∼64% 0%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1234 Points ∼46% -27%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
2657 Points ∼100% +58%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1622 - 1689, n=4)
1668 Points ∼63% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4455, n=235, last 2 years)
1939 Points ∼73% +15%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2258 Points ∼94%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2400 Points ∼100% +6%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
2324 Points ∼97% +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2121 - 2400, n=3)
2260 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=125, last 2 years)
2045 Points ∼85% -9%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2248 Points ∼84%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2314 Points ∼87% +3%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
374 Points ∼14% -83%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
2668 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2210 - 2314, n=4)
2257 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=129, last 2 years)
2133 Points ∼80% -5%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
8236 Points ∼74%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
10373 Points ∼93% +26%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7554 Points ∼68% -8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
11153 Points ∼100% +35%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (8236 - 10373, n=2)
9305 Points ∼83% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 16564, n=45, last 2 years)
9536 Points ∼86% +16%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3202 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3501 Points ∼100% +9%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2542 Points ∼73% -21%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1797 Points ∼51% -44%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2542 - 3511, n=4)
3127 Points ∼89% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=261, last 2 years)
3370 Points ∼96% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3558 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3647 Points ∼93% +3%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2398 Points ∼61% -33%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1681 Points ∼43% -53%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2398 - 3592, n=4)
3201 Points ∼81% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=261, last 2 years)
3942 Points ∼100% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2372 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3070 Points ∼95% +29%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
3222 Points ∼100% +36%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2368 Points ∼73% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2372 - 3253, n=4)
3024 Points ∼94% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=261, last 2 years)
2757 Points ∼86% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3120 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3669 Points ∼47% +18%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
3293 Points ∼42% +6%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1819 Points ∼23% -42%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
7752 Points ∼100% +148%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (3120 - 3336, n=4)
3230 Points ∼42% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=277, last 2 years)
3947 Points ∼51% +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3335 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3803 Points ∼32% +14%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
3285 Points ∼27% -1%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1737 Points ∼14% -48%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
12070 Points ∼100% +262%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (3148 - 3335, n=4)
3272 Points ∼27% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=277, last 2 years)
4982 Points ∼41% +49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2547 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3267 Points ∼95% +28%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
3323 Points ∼97% +30%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2182 Points ∼63% -14%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
3442 Points ∼100% +35%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2547 - 3392, n=4)
3128 Points ∼91% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=275, last 2 years)
2908 Points ∼84% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2587 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2507 Points ∼91% -3%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2745 Points ∼100% +6%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1151 Points ∼42% -56%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2587 - 2754, n=4)
2702 Points ∼98% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=259, last 2 years)
2628 Points ∼96% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2633 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2369 Points ∼85% -10%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2633 Points ∼95% 0%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
998 Points ∼36% -62%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2599 - 2643, n=4)
2627 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=259, last 2 years)
2784 Points ∼100% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2436 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3152 Points ∼98% +29%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
3228 Points ∼100% +33%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2474 Points ∼77% +2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2436 - 3261, n=4)
3039 Points ∼94% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=259, last 2 years)
2803 Points ∼87% +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2682 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2680 Points ∼39% 0%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2754 Points ∼40% +3%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1152 Points ∼17% -57%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
6871 Points ∼100% +156%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2682 - 2849, n=4)
2767 Points ∼40% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=275, last 2 years)
3191 Points ∼46% +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2743 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2551 Points ∼31% -7%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2712 Points ∼33% -1%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1015 Points ∼12% -63%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
8218 Points ∼100% +200%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2682 - 2743, n=4)
2715 Points ∼33% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=275, last 2 years)
3565 Points ∼43% +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2488 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3256 Points ∼75% +31%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2914 Points ∼67% +17%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2177 Points ∼50% -12%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
4367 Points ∼100% +76%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2488 - 3405, n=4)
3005 Points ∼69% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=275, last 2 years)
2959 Points ∼68% +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2641 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2353 Points ∼44% -11%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2826 Points ∼52% +7%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1113 Points ∼21% -58%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
5406 Points ∼100% +105%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2641 - 2852, n=4)
2778 Points ∼51% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=216, last 2 years)
2634 Points ∼49% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2845 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2257 Points ∼32% -21%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2878 Points ∼41% +1%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
968 Points ∼14% -66%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
6987 Points ∼100% +146%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2788 - 2878, n=4)
2847 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=216, last 2 years)
2956 Points ∼42% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2110 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2765 Points ∼92% +31%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2656 Points ∼88% +26%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2349 Points ∼78% +11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
3017 Points ∼100% +43%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2110 - 2813, n=4)
2586 Points ∼86% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=216, last 2 years)
2651 Points ∼88% +26%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1493 Points ∼43%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
383 Points ∼11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
3488 Points ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
 
1493 Points ∼43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=91, last 2 years)
2735 Points ∼78%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1502 Points ∼43%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points ∼0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
3455 Points ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
 
1502 Points ∼43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 8672, n=88, last 2 years)
2941 Points ∼85%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
108 Points ∼11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
987 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (83 - 2288, n=39, last 2 years)
856 Points ∼87%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points ∼0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
974 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (117 - 1982, n=37, last 2 years)
873 Points ∼90%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
60 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
59 fps ∼50% -2%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
35 fps ∼29% -42%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
119 fps ∼100% +98%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (45 - 60, n=2)
52.5 fps ∼44% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=216, last 2 years)
57 fps ∼48% -5%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
85 fps ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
86 fps ∼47% +1%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
35 fps ∼19% -59%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
184 fps ∼100% +116%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (81 - 85, n=2)
83 fps ∼45% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=216, last 2 years)
106 fps ∼58% +25%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
49 fps ∼48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
37 fps ∼36% -24%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
19 fps ∼18% -61%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
103 fps ∼100% +110%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (42 - 49, n=2)
45.5 fps ∼44% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=214, last 2 years)
44.9 fps ∼44% -8%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
52 fps ∼47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
42 fps ∼38% -19%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
19 fps ∼17% -63%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
110 fps ∼100% +112%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (52 - 52, n=2)
52 fps ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=215, last 2 years)
61.9 fps ∼56% +19%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
31 fps ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼36% -13%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps ∼18% -58%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
74 fps ∼100% +139%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (29 - 31, n=2)
30 fps ∼41% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=213, last 2 years)
35.4 fps ∼48% +14%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
32 fps ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
31 fps ∼40% -3%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps ∼17% -59%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
77 fps ∼100% +141%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (32 - 33, n=2)
32.5 fps ∼42% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=213, last 2 years)
42.4 fps ∼55% +33%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
18 fps ∼41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼36% -11%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7 fps ∼16% -61%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
44 fps ∼100% +144%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (17 - 18, n=2)
17.5 fps ∼40% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=212, last 2 years)
22.1 fps ∼50% +23%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19 fps ∼41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼39% -5%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7.1 fps ∼15% -63%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
46 fps ∼100% +142%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (19 - 19, n=2)
19 fps ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=212, last 2 years)
25.4 fps ∼55% +34%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19 fps ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼38% -11%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼42% 0%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
8.3 fps ∼18% -56%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
45 fps ∼100% +137%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (18 - 19, n=4)
18.8 fps ∼42% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=281, last 2 years)
22.2 fps ∼49% +17%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
20 fps ∼43%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
21 fps ∼46% +5%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
8.2 fps ∼18% -59%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
46 fps ∼100% +130%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (20 - 21, n=4)
20.8 fps ∼45% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=280, last 2 years)
25.5 fps ∼55% +28%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
12 fps ∼41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼38% -8%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼41% 0%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
4.9 fps ∼17% -59%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
29 fps ∼100% +142%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (11 - 12, n=4)
11.8 fps ∼41% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=281, last 2 years)
14.7 fps ∼51% +23%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
7.4 fps ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7 fps ∼41% -5%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
7.7 fps ∼45% +4%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2.8 fps ∼16% -62%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
17 fps ∼100% +130%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (7.4 - 7.8, n=4)
7.65 fps ∼45% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=280, last 2 years)
10.1 fps ∼59% +36%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
330876 Points ∼59%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
198053 Points ∼35% -40%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
563850 Points ∼100% +70%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
 
330876 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (121238 - 815441, n=37, last 2 years)
465139 Points ∼82% +41%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
282417 Points ∼58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
275931 Points ∼57% -2%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
185542 Points ∼38% -34%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
483527 Points ∼100% +71%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (282417 - 295778, n=2)
289098 Points ∼60% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=187, last 2 years)
331119 Points ∼68% +17%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
6118 Points ∼11%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
15832 Points ∼27% +159%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
46152 Points ∼79% +654%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (6118 - 12399, n=2)
9259 Points ∼16% +51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 264766, n=65, last 2 years)
58160 Points ∼100% +851%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1566 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3542 Points ∼68% +126%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2247 Points ∼43% +43%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
5224 Points ∼100% +234%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1566 - 3182, n=2)
2374 Points ∼45% +52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=199, last 2 years)
3623 Points ∼69% +131%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2083 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6828 Points ∼80% +228%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
4921 Points ∼58% +136%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
8549 Points ∼100% +310%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2083 - 5564, n=2)
3824 Points ∼45% +84%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=199, last 2 years)
6633 Points ∼78% +218%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1012 Points ∼18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
4295 Points ∼75% +324%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2618 Points ∼46% +159%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
5716 Points ∼100% +465%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1012 - 3758, n=2)
2385 Points ∼42% +136%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=199, last 2 years)
4238 Points ∼74% +319%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3178 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3807 Points ∼36% +20%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1832 Points ∼17% -42%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
10549 Points ∼100% +232%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (3178 - 3807, n=2)
3493 Points ∼33% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=199, last 2 years)
5605 Points ∼53% +76%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
898 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1410 Points ∼98% +57%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1081 Points ∼75% +20%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
1445 Points ∼100% +61%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (898 - 1288, n=2)
1093 Points ∼76% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=199, last 2 years)
1272 Points ∼88% +42%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
62.028 Points ∼100% +267%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=185, last 2 years)
50 Points ∼81% +195%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
48.527 Points ∼78% +187%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
32.187 Points ∼52% +90%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (16.9 - 40.4, n=3)
31.4 Points ∼51% +86%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
16.922 Points ∼27%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
110.16 Points ∼100% +313%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=193, last 2 years)
89.7 Points ∼81% +236%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
89.457 Points ∼81% +236%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (26.7 - 70.8, n=2)
48.7 Points ∼44% +83%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
47.837 Points ∼43% +79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
26.662 Points ∼24%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
59 runs/min ∼100% +301%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=166, last 2 years)
50.7 runs/min ∼86% +245%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chome 81)
44.1 runs/min ∼75% +200%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
26.5 runs/min ∼45% +80%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (14.7 - 34.2, n=2)
24.5 runs/min ∼42% +67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
14.7 runs/min ∼25%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
90 Points ∼100% +221%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=203, last 2 years)
77.9 Points ∼87% +178%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
69 Points ∼77% +146%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
59 Points ∼66% +111%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (28 - 55, n=3)
43.3 Points ∼48% +55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
28 Points ∼31%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
23902 Points ∼100% +397%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=210, last 2 years)
17317 Points ∼72% +260%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
17303 Points ∼72% +260%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (4808 - 15814, n=2)
10311 Points ∼43% +114%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
8958 Points ∼37% +86%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
4808 Points ∼20%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
10797.4 ms * ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (3298 - 10797, n=3)
5825 ms * ∼54% +46%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
4321.8 ms * ∼40% +60%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=212, last 2 years)
3993 ms * ∼37% +63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
2794.2 ms * ∼26% +74%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
2154.8 ms * ∼20% +80%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10SXiaomi Redmi Note 9Srealme 8Oppo A74Xiaomi Poco X3 ProAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-4%
-1%
1%
85%
28%
15%
Sequential Read 256KB
498.76
496.6
0%
526.2
6%
514.5
3%
1330.34
167%
704 (482 - 989, n=11)
41%
750 (41.9 - 2037, n=287, last 2 years)
50%
Sequential Write 256KB
371.98
214.8
-42%
187.8
-50%
255.34
-31%
527.22
42%
384 (241 - 710, n=11)
3%
327 (11.9 - 1321, n=287, last 2 years)
-12%
Random Read 4KB
110.47
137
24%
144
30%
139.45
26%
203.15
84%
151 (105 - 208, n=11)
37%
134 (13.5 - 325, n=287, last 2 years)
21%
Random Write 4KB
120.97
123.6
2%
133
10%
126.39
4%
176.9
46%
158 (121 - 207, n=11)
31%
120 (4.97 - 330, n=287, last 2 years)
-1%
051015202530354045505540545851504142354450444047515250495247454654585354504747202425253137404550484250403541463747544646464947414141374239324242444951515049584739333338363239455049434548494839424039424336394239414346434747404648464949454847524947504346464240394235404040463742394342403746505050413544494444434054585150414235445044404751525049524745465458535450474720242525313740455048425040354146374754464646494741414137423932424244495151504958473933333836323945504943454849483942403942433639423941434643474740464846494945484752494750434646424039423540404046374239434240374650505041354449444443485657574751535653535451555651565055564949555453495955585353555953595757594239565056564958555557525353545558525445525151515152574553564052483950384648424543474944544446524951554757485755525552545839554345474451515256504846465447524745494544394350434834434349514351464842455043514746515054525251504950534847525851555450565145494449504955545254505754485652535354575255545151384850474431404043505542495042565555455050545854575351565553535440545851504142354450444047515250495247454654585354504747202425253137404550484250403541463747544646464947414141374239324242444951515049584739333338363239455049434548494839424039424336394239414346434747404648464949454847524947504346464240394235404040463742394342403746505050413544494444434856575747515356535354515556515650555649495554534959555853535559535957575942395650565649585555575253535455585254455251515151525745535640524839503846484245434749445444465249515547574857555255525458395543454744515152565048464654475247454945443943504348344343495143514648424550435147465150545252515049505348475258515554505651454944495049555452545057544856525353545752555451513848504744314040435055424950425655554550505458545753515655535354323734413537393940391937283025353030343534353329292628312930302833303130322925333229312933323526303033303232302928302929302929312631292831293030312523202632272825272524312629272931333129272731323025312725262632312728323334323231322929313233303634333436303026343532343031332730303032323332293633333335353434333333313331302932323233303129323134312929293026302728303027302931282935Tooltip
; Armajet: Ø43.8 (20-58)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø50.5 (31-59)
; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø30.6 (19-41)
Hög belastning
 38.6 °C37.3 °C32.8 °C 
 37.8 °C36.8 °C31.7 °C 
 36.7 °C35.3 °C31 °C 
Max: 38.6 °C
Medel: 35.3 °C
32.9 °C35.9 °C37.5 °C
32.2 °C34.1 °C37.3 °C
30.8 °C33.7 °C34.6 °C
Max: 37.5 °C
Medel: 34.3 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  26.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203032.92526.725.63125.624.54026.121.65036.434.66329.222.6802528.210017.824.912518.328.816018.638.920017.442.225014.247.831515.955.940012.857.85001462.763013.368.780012.274.4100012.376.4125011.977.9160012.876.2200012.777.5250012.178315012.978.7400013.280500013.479630013.677.2800013.473.11000013.970.51250014711600014.266.7SPL25.288.9N0.775median 13.4median 71Delta1.212.233.640.33541.124.824.924.927.128.5272724.815.715.316.52415.722.214.431.89.137.29.641.27.551.110.654.912.358.718.763.517.664.115.768.711.568.810.872.69.972.61372.216.47015.466.81761.318.263.420.266.820.465.917.366.717.850.128.380.90.945.6median 15.7median 63.52.89.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 10Srealme 8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

realme 8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.12 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.69 / 1.46 / 1.5 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.67 / 5.58 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
5020 mAh
Oppo A74
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
5160 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G95
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-61%
-2%
-53%
-64%
-31%
Idle Minimum *
0.69
1.5
-117%
0.62
10%
0.79
-14%
1.595 (0.69 - 2.5, n=2)
-131%
0.934 (0.37 - 2.5, n=234, last 2 years)
-35%
Idle Average *
1.46
2.1
-44%
1.59
-9%
2.21
-51%
2.53 (1.46 - 3.6, n=2)
-73%
1.843 (0.65 - 3.94, n=234, last 2 years)
-26%
Idle Maximum *
1.5
2.5
-67%
1.63
-9%
2.26
-51%
2.6 (1.5 - 3.7, n=2)
-73%
2.1 (0.69 - 4.2, n=234, last 2 years)
-40%
Load Average *
3.67
5.2
-42%
4.05
-10%
6.17
-68%
4.34 (3.67 - 5, n=2)
-18%
4.46 (2.1 - 8.4, n=234, last 2 years)
-22%
Load Maximum *
5.58
7.5
-34%
5.2
7%
10.09
-81%
6.99 (5.58 - 8.4, n=2)
-25%
7.24 (3.16 - 12.3, n=234, last 2 years)
-30%

* ... smaller is better

Energiförbrukning: Geekbench, GFXBench och tomgång (150 cd/m²)

0123456781.1371.1071.0871.0691.1081.061.0981.0751.21.0751.1171.1081.0631.151.1121.1031.0871.0961.0821.0081.0241.0160.9810.9841.0460.9861.041.011.0371.0431.0221.0141.0161.0231.0251.0321.0431.031.0171.0141.0151.0820.9940.9541.0671.0290.991.0020.9820.9741.0590.9770.9891.1281.0841.031.1131.0340.9951.1371.1071.0871.0691.1081.061.0981.0751.21.0751.1171.1081.0631.151.1121.1031.0871.0961.0821.0081.0241.0160.9810.9841.0460.9861.041.011.0371.0431.0221.0141.0161.0231.0251.0321.0431.031.0171.0141.0151.0820.9940.9541.0671.0290.991.0020.9820.9741.0590.9770.9891.1281.0841.031.1131.0340.9953.283.032.832.481.4541.3151.5222.831.6841.5661.3611.3961.4971.5461.5141.3232.011.3171.781.3321.42.112.071.51.7191.9221.3281.792.051.3411.4341.4512.431.41655.365.475.465.685.095.255.375.245.115.25.275.165.315.345.245.225.285.435.565.454.915.325.45.545.485.655.555.855.995.75.615.685.755.775.545.455.435.485.456.055.385.545.315.215.175.455.375.635.485.65.595.625.625.645.635.555.395.295.445.045.545.415.365.353.711.5921.1371.1071.0871.0691.1081.061.0981.0751.21.0751.1171.1081.0631.151.1121.1031.0871.0961.0821.0081.0241.0160.9810.9841.0460.9861.041.011.0371.0431.0221.0141.0161.0231.0251.0321.0431.031.0171.0141.0151.0820.9940.9541.0671.0290.991.0020.9820.9741.0590.9770.9891.1281.0841.031.1131.0340.9953.283.032.832.481.4541.3151.5222.831.6841.5661.3611.3961.4971.5461.5141.3232.011.3171.781.3321.42.112.071.51.7191.9221.3281.792.051.3411.4341.4512.431.41655.365.475.465.685.095.255.375.245.115.25.275.165.315.345.245.225.285.435.565.454.915.325.45.545.485.655.555.855.995.75.615.685.755.775.545.455.435.485.456.055.385.545.315.215.175.455.375.635.485.65.595.625.625.645.635.555.395.295.445.045.545.415.365.353.711.5924.082.412.82.572.572.522.512.472.542.482.612.481.0332.562.472.421.5862.212.252.232.232.213.012.883.282.820.9761.6431.6730.9622.520.9772.622.70.9421.3561.6951.6332.812.680.9421.3142.520.9572.482.562.522.572.532.572.522.522.582.522.532.572.530.9362.312.490.9562.054.24.494.34.294.224.251.9824.210.9581.4292.560.8922.552.562.511.5650.9552.840.9860.9632.712.62.582.71.1661.5542.621.1222.782.812.83.412.773.042.782.792.453.010.9411.122.592.852.682.712.732.130.9181.0840.9471.0945.255.185.124.345.355.224.784.765.395.25.084.715.335.235.074.375.455.255.194.620.9666.115.816.276.25.311.0150.9552.955.635.435.275.35.645.485.825.55.75.571.2041.0216.431.1691.1885.995.31.2566.736.856.75.41.8893.464.825.135.825.976.186.421.0161.0477.035.995.611.0710.975.395.145.10.9475.436.035.384.80.9967.717.924.222.045.185.165.731.0070.9795.996.764.636.096.14.65.980.9596.056.256.076.056.211.4586.77.045.037.225.775.736.394.177.295.157.266.832.171.2187.084.991.0098.047.927.257.514.287.17.066.435.145.546.096.115.384.083.722.134.14.864.354.524.293.154.666.516.486.826.091.6161.1462.661.2571.2961.3331.5713.095.345.285.095.315.295.115.554.894.734.834.193.924.134.31.6011.265.275.181.268Tooltip
; Idle 1min: Ø1.048 (0.954-1.2)
; Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.16 (1.315-6.05)
; Geekbench 5.4: Ø3.74 (0.892-8.04)
Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
60tim 12min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
18tim 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19tim 32min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
6tim 08min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
5020 mAh
realme 8
5000 mAh
Oppo A74
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
5160 mAh
Battery Runtime
-11%
-4%
-15%
-24%
Reader / Idle
3612
2263
-37%
2386
-34%
2372
-34%
H.264
1172
1269
8%
1179
1%
973
-17%
WiFi v1.3
1087
1187
9%
1039
-4%
982
-10%
879
-19%
Load
368
279
-24%
314
-15%
276
-25%

För

+ Ljusstark skärm
+ Stereohögtalare
+ IP53-certifiering
+ Kan använda två SIM-kort och ett microSD-kort samtidigt

Emot

- Marginella prestandaförbättringar jämfört med föregångaren
- Allt för aggressiv energihantering påverkar GNSS negativt
- Har inte stöd för Widevine DRM L1
- Instabil bilduppdatering när man spelar spel
- Saknar stöd för exFAT-formaterade SD-kort
- Endast 12 månaders garanti

Omdöme - Gedigen prestanda, bra hårdvara

Recension av Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. Recensionsex från Xiaomi Germany
Recension av Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. Recensionsex från Xiaomi Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Redmi Note 10S är ytterligare en väl prissatt mittenskiktstelefon från Xiaomi. Den har skaplig prestanda och kan hantera de flesta apparna. Väldigt krävande applikationer kan dock kännas långsamma på Xiaomis telefon. Det kan också ta en tag för innehåll att läsas in på riktigt tunga sidor. Däremot är batteritiden bra och kamerasystemet skapligt.         

Redmi Note 10 har en riktigt bra hårdvarumix.

Frågan är vilken man ska välja: Redmi Note 10, Redmi Note 10S eller Redmi Note 10 Pro. Priset på dessa varierar mellan 2.000 - 3.000 kronor. Väljer du rätt kan du spara en del pengar. Redmi Note 10 har inte har något NFC-chip, men det har Note 10 Pro och den kommer också med ett bättre kamerasystem. Redmi Note 10S framstår som en bra kompromiss. Den största konkurrenten till Redmi Note 10S är realme 8, som har liknande prestanda. Har man redan en Redmi Note 9S finns det ingen anledning att byta till Redmi Note 10S.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S - 06/17/2021 v7
Mike Wobker

Design
87%
Tangentbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Mus
89%
Anslutningar
48 / 70 → 68%
Vikt
90%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
89%
Spelprestanda
29 / 64 → 45%
Programprestanda
50 / 86 → 58%
Temperatur
91%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 81%
Camera
63%
Medel
74%
81%
Smartphone - Vägt medel