Test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 - En drömskärm för den prismedvetne köparen (Sammanfattning)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Redmi Note Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 610
Minne
6144 MB
Skärm
6.30 tum 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 409 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB
, 108 GB ledigt
Vikt
190 g, Strömförsörjning: 51 g
Pris
200 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Enhetsöversikt
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79.2 % | 11/2019 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 SD 665, Adreno 610 | 190 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.30" | 2340x1080 | |
77.9 % | 10/2019 | Xiaomi Mi A3 SD 665, Adreno 610 | 173.8 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.09" | 1560x720 | |
80.7 % | 04/2019 | Nokia 4.2 SD 439, Adreno 505 | 161 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 5.71" | 1520x720 | |
75.5 % | 07/2019 | Samsung Galaxy A20e Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2 | 141 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 5.80" | 1560x720 | |
75 % | 10/2019 | LG K50 Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320 | 170 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.26" | 1520x720 | |
70.9 % | 08/2019 | Gigaset GS195 SC9863A, GE8322 / IMG8322 | 180 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.18" | 2246x1080 | |
84.6 % | 05/2019 | Honor 20 Lite Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4 | 164 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.21" | 2340x1080 |
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12 | |
Average of class Smartphone (5.59 - 1395, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12 | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.5 - 1348, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Gigaset GS195 |
; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø339 (320-349)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø303 (242-355)

14.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E

26.8 ∆E
48.9 ∆E
36 ∆E
38 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
59.1 ∆E
49.1 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
59.7 ∆E
60.4 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
70.2 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
42.4 ∆E
74.7 ∆E
66.6 ∆E
48.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
13 ∆E
|
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 658 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 642.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.45 cd/m²Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 95 %
Mitt på batteriet: 656 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1215:1 (Svärta: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.30 | Xiaomi Mi A3 AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.09 | Nokia 4.2 IPS, 1520x720, 5.71 | Samsung Galaxy A20e IPS, 1560x720, 5.80 | LG K50 IPS, 1520x720, 6.26 | Gigaset GS195 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18 | Honor 20 Lite IPS, 2340x1080, 6.21 | Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -191% | -114% | -160% | -89% | -155% | -92% | 8% | |
Brightness middle | 656 | 348 -47% | 445 -32% | 475 -28% | 489 -25% | 487 -26% | 455 -31% | 593 -10% |
Brightness | 643 | 355 -45% | 424 -34% | 473 -26% | 453 -30% | 507 -21% | 456 -29% | 587 -9% |
Brightness Distribution | 95 | 91 -4% | 91 -4% | 93 -2% | 85 -11% | 84 -12% | 94 -1% | 94 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.54 | 0.26 52% | 0.35 35% | 0.42 22% | 0.55 -2% | 0.58 -7% | ||
Contrast | 1215 | 1712 41% | 1357 12% | 1164 -4% | 885 -27% | 784 -35% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 5.86 -433% | 5.9 -436% | 6.8 -518% | 4.75 -332% | 5.67 -415% | 4.43 -303% | 0.9 18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.4 | 15.6 -550% | 9.3 -288% | 13.4 -458% | 7.75 -223% | 13.54 -464% | 6.81 -184% | 2 17% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 3.6 -64% | 6.8 -209% | 8.7 -295% | 4.6 -109% | 8.2 -273% | 5.4 -145% | 1.5 32% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.232 99% | 2.2 100% | 2.33 94% | 2.164 102% | 2.27 97% | 2.248 98% | 2.27 97% |
CCT | 6263 104% | 7051 92% | 8443 77% | 9385 69% | 7510 87% | 7569 86% | 7336 89% | 6548 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21941 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.6 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
49.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise | |
↘ 26 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37 ms). |
Geekbench 5.0 | Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | Basemark GPU 1.1 | VRMark | BaseMark OS II | AnTuTu v8
Geekbench 5.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (313 - 315, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (363 - 1164, n=4, last 2 years) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1327 - 1392, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1257 - 3699, n=4, last 2 years) | |
OpenCL Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (363 - 371, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1175 - 4186, n=4, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1495 - 1536, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (711 - 6984, n=58, last 2 years) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (5134 - 5663, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3531 - 15310, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (5122 - 5144, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2810 - 11362, n=46, last 2 years) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7437 - 9051, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3341 - 19989, n=118, last 2 years) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Gigaset GS195 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6189 - 11432, n=12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=166, last 2 years) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (30 - 52, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (9.5 - 143, n=203, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (35 - 37, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 428, n=203, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (15 - 34, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (4.5 - 121, n=202, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (19 - 20, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2.4 - 251, n=203, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (10 - 27, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 121, n=202, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K50 | |
Honor 20 Lite | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (13 - 13, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 169, n=203, last 2 years) |
Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | |
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.65 - 10.7, n=2) | |
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (8.24 - 12, n=2) |
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T | |
Nokia 8.1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1092 - 1134, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (421 - 7649, n=45, last 2 years) |
AnTuTu v8 | |
Total Score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (167305 - 181432, n=9) | |
Average of class Smartphone (77514 - 727247, n=142, last 2 years) | |
CPU (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (62570 - 71112, n=9) | |
Average of class Smartphone (30597 - 195269, n=142, last 2 years) | |
GPU (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (32489 - 34855, n=9) | |
Average of class Smartphone (4095 - 320795, n=142, last 2 years) | |
MEM (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (27018 - 44461, n=9) | |
Average of class Smartphone (14535 - 118523, n=142, last 2 years) | |
UX (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (26864 - 45742, n=9) | |
Average of class Smartphone (20014 - 119537, n=142, last 2 years) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182.6, n=176, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78) | |
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22.9 - 31.2, n=6) | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=183, last 2 years) | |
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33.4 - 51, n=8) | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) | |
LG K50 (Chrome 77) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chome 76) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (25.4 - 30.8, n=6) | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) |
WebXPRT 3 - --- | |
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 265, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9) | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) | |
LG K50 (Chrome 77) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=192, last 2 years) | |
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9) | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) | |
LG K50 (Chrome 77) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
LG K50 (Chrome 77) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121) | |
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9) | |
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78) | |
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 15230, n=193, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 | Xiaomi Mi A3 | Nokia 4.2 | Samsung Galaxy A20e | LG K50 | Gigaset GS195 | Honor 20 Lite | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 26% | -41% | -16% | -28% | -46% | -3% | -2% | 92% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 297.6 | 502 69% | 220.4 -26% | 300.4 1% | 263.4 -11% | 107.3 -64% | 288.1 -3% | 282 ? -5% | 900 ? 202% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 160.5 | 184 15% | 18.17 -89% | 103.6 -35% | 78.9 -51% | 29.42 -82% | 200.9 25% | 191.9 ? 20% | 437 ? 172% |
Random Read 4KB | 84.8 | 126.9 50% | 17.51 -79% | 79.8 -6% | 52.1 -39% | 28.43 -66% | 38.7 -54% | 81.2 ? -4% | 160 ? 89% |
Random Write 4KB | 91.2 | 117.4 29% | 4.31 -95% | 13.18 -86% | 12.03 -87% | 4.97 -95% | 73.1 -20% | 48.7 ? -47% | 152.2 ? 67% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 71.6 ? | 67.8 ? -5% | 86.7 ? 21% | 79.2 ? 11% | 78.9 ? 10% | 80.9 ? 13% | 75.7 ? 6% | 78.1 ? 9% | 78.1 ? 9% |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 52.8 ? | 50.1 ? -5% | 65.9 ? 25% | 64.3 ? 22% | 58.9 ? 12% | 62.1 ? 18% | 66.9 ? 27% | 61.8 ? 17% | 59.6 ? 13% |
PUBG Mobile
; Smooth: Ø30 (29-31)
; Balanced: Ø24.7 (20-26)
Asphalt 9: Legends
; High Quality: Ø14.8 (9-23)
; Standard / low: Ø20.3 (12-31)
Dead Trigger 2
: Ø59.6 (49-60)
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.