Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Nokia 7 Plus Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 458 cd/m²
Kontrast: 2082:1 (Svärta: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
| Nokia 7 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6.00 | Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50 | Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra IPS, 1920x1080, 6.00 | Wiko WIM AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50 | Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 5.60 | OnePlus 5T AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.01 | Samsung Galaxy S8 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.80 | Huawei P20 Pro OLED, 2240x1080, 6.10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -25% | -4% | -28% | 7% | 22% | 24% | 43% | |
| Brightness middle | 458 | 456 0% | 659 44% | 344 -25% | 541 18% | 425 -7% | 566 24% | 569 24% |
| Brightness | 463 | 455 -2% | 680 47% | 353 -24% | 538 16% | 423 -9% | 564 22% | 578 25% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 85 -8% | 88 -4% | 90 -2% | 96 4% | 92 0% | 94 2% | 95 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.56 -155% | ||||||
| Contrast | 2082 | 1177 -43% | ||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4 | 5.6 -40% | 2.8 30% | 5.7 -43% | 5.8 -45% | 2.1 47% | 2.7 32% | 1.3 67% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.4 | 11.1 -50% | 6.5 12% | 12.2 -65% | 3.4 54% | 5.4 27% | 2.1 72% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 6.9 -47% | 3 36% | 5.1 -9% | 2.7 43% | 2.5 47% | 3.1 34% | 1.6 66% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.3 96% | 2.18 101% | 2.73 81% | 2.07 106% | 2.32 95% | 2.15 102% | 2.31 95% |
| CCT | 7425 88% | 7883 82% | 6938 94% | 7407 88% | 6570 99% | 6455 101% | 6335 103% | 6401 102% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 81.57 | |||||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.87 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (45.3 - 55.5, n=12) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL (Chrome 64) | |
| Wiko WIM (Chrome Version 59) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8463 - 10945, n=14) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL (Chrome 64) | |
| Wiko WIM (Chrome Version 59) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL (Chrome 64) | |
| Wiko WIM (Chrome Version 59) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3796 - 4769, n=13) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (159 - 182, n=8) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (47 - 63, n=9) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 7 Plus | Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL | Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra | Wiko WIM | Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | OnePlus 5T | Samsung Galaxy S8 | Huawei P20 Pro | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -16% | -7% | -17% | -4% | 74% | 41% | 267% | 6% | 625% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 283.1 | 269.3 -5% | 273.7 -3% | 272.1 -4% | 299.9 6% | 699 147% | 793 180% | 832 194% | 273 ? -4% | 1508 ? 433% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 211.6 | 139.5 -34% | 138.8 -34% | 136.7 -35% | 104.2 -51% | 203.4 -4% | 193.2 -9% | 196.7 -7% | 176.8 ? -16% | 1118 ? 428% |
| Random Read 4KB | 54.7 | 36.8 -33% | 76 39% | 38.1 -30% | 82.6 51% | 138.1 152% | 127.2 133% | 144.3 164% | 59.1 ? 8% | 247 ? 352% |
| Random Write 4KB | 19.62 | 12 -39% | 10.1 -49% | 13.34 -32% | 14.69 -25% | 20 2% | 15.25 -22% | 160.5 718% | 31.7 ? 62% | 272 ? 1286% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.2 | 83.9 ? 2% | 85.9 ? 5% | 83.8 2% | 77.9 ? -5% | 63.9 ? -22% | 77.4 ? -6% | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.3 | 72.1 ? 16% | 63.3 ? 2% | 61.4 -1% | 62.3 ? 0% | 53.5 ? -14% | 58.3 ? -6% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high | 29 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| World of Tanks Blitz | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high, 0xAA, 0xAF | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Nokia 7 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0 / 0.13 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.65 / 1.76 / 1.78 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
4.47 / 9.13 Watt |
    
| |
| Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh | Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra 3580 mAh | Wiko WIM 3200 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 3000 mAh | OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh | Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 36% | -6% | 21% | 25% | 16% | 21% | 23% | -37% | -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.65 | 0.58 11% | 0.77 -18% | 0.93 -43% | 0.67 -3% | 0.58 11% | 0.78 -20% | 0.84 -29% | 1.052 ? -62% | 0.897 ? -38% |
| Idle Average * | 1.76 | 1.31 26% | 2.12 -20% | 1.28 27% | 1.02 42% | 1.44 18% | 1.1 37% | 1.54 12% | 2.62 ? -49% | 1.452 ? 17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.78 | 1.33 25% | 2.17 -22% | 1.37 23% | 1.1 38% | 1.53 14% | 1.16 35% | 1.57 12% | 2.88 ? -62% | 1.629 ? 8% |
| Load Average * | 4.47 | 1.88 58% | 4.3 4% | 2.39 47% | 3.86 14% | 3.17 29% | 4.15 7% | 2.47 45% | 5.1 ? -14% | 5.55 ? -24% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.13 | 3.8 58% | 6.73 26% | 4.25 53% | 5.97 35% | 8.54 6% | 5.12 44% | 2.49 73% | 9.08 ? 1% | 8.31 ? 9% |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh | Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra 3580 mAh | Wiko WIM 3200 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 3000 mAh | OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh | Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -3% | 27% | -27% | 20% | 22% | 20% | 35% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1703 | 1788 5% | 1546 -9% | 1754 3% | 1667 -2% | 1727 1% | ||
| H.264 | 706 | 876 24% | 908 29% | 799 13% | 771 9% | 784 11% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 672 | 654 -3% | 849 26% | 492 -27% | 646 -4% | 718 7% | 719 7% | 744 11% |
| Load | 158 | 238 51% | 260 65% | 257 63% | 264 67% | 345 118% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Med Nokia 7 Plus erbjuder den Finska tillverkaren HMD Global en väldigt intressant helhet som ligger i prisskiktet runt 3 600 - 4000 kronor (vid skrivande stund). Detta gäller särskilt med tanke på att telefonen kommer via Android One-programmet och därför garanteras säkerhets och mjukvaruuppdateringar för en lång tid framöver.
Nokia 7 Plus ser bra ut och känns väldigt bra. Men med det sagt så tyckte vi inte att materialvalet på enhetens baksida var 100% imponerande. Dessutom känns telefonens sidor kantiga och den känns klumpig i handen.
Skärmen, kameran och dess SoC är ganska konkurrenskraftiga för en enhet på 4 000 kronor. Men om du kan tänka dig att spendera runt 500 - 1 000 kronor mer så kan du skaffa dig en Samsung Galaxy S8, som har en mycket bättre skärm och en snabbare SoC. Batteritiden är redan vid släpp väldigt bra, men det finns ändå rum för förbättring.
Om det priset som vanligt faller efter den släppts så erbjuder Nokia 7 Plus en väldigt intressant kombination av hårdvara och mjukvara. Den som är intresserad av en mittenskikts-smartphone borde ta en närmare titt på Nokia 7 Plus.
Nokia 7 Plus
-
11/04/2019 v7
Marcus Herbrich