Notebookcheck

Test: HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl (i5-8250U, HD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 08/08/2018

Bättre och bättre. Pavilion-serien har kommit lång i fråga om design och känsla. Den senaste versionen är rejält förbättrad, men fortfarande underlägsen dom lyxigare Envy- och Spectre-serierna.

HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl (Pavilion 15 Serie)
Grafikkort
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Kärna: 300 MHz, Minne: 1200 MHz, DDR4, 23.20.16.4973
Minne
12288 MB 
, 1x 8 GB SK Hynix DDR4-2400 1200 MHz, 1x 4 GB Micron DDR4-2666 1333 MHz
Skärm
15.6 tum 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixlar 100 PPI, AU Optronics B156XW02 V0, TN LED, AUO20EC, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Hårddisk
Toshiba MQ04ABF100, 1000 GB 
, 5400 rpm
Ljudkort
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Anslutningar
3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: kombinerad 3.5 mm, Kortläsare: SD-kortläsare
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 17.8 x 361.7 x 245.6
Batteri
41 Wh, 3 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Övrigt
Högtalare: Bang & Olufsen stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, McAfee LifeSafe, HP CoolSense, 12 Månader Garanti
Vikt
1.785 kg, Strömförsörjning: 242 g
Pris
550 USD
Länkar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Framsidan: Inga anslutningar
Framsidan: Inga anslutningar
Vänster: HDMI 1.4, RJ-45, USB Typ C Gen 1, 3.5 mm kombinerad ljudanslutning
Vänster: HDMI 1.4, RJ-45, USB Typ C Gen 1, 3.5 mm kombinerad ljudanslutning
Baksidan: Inga anslutningar
Baksidan: Inga anslutningar
Höger: Kensington-lås, 2x USB 3.1, Nätadapter, SD-kortläsare
Höger: Kensington-lås, 2x USB 3.1, Nätadapter, SD-kortläsare
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
174 MB/s ∼100% +379%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
163.8 MB/s ∼94% +351%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
36.31 MB/s ∼21%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
212.4 MB/s ∼100% +451%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
192 MB/s ∼90% +398%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
38.56 MB/s ∼18%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
656 MBit/s ∼100% +168%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
525 MBit/s ∼80% +114%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821
245 MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
575 MBit/s ∼100% +105%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
479 MBit/s ∼83% +71%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821
280 MBit/s ∼49%
209.6
cd/m²
211.8
cd/m²
204.9
cd/m²
212.3
cd/m²
220.1
cd/m²
208.7
cd/m²
204.9
cd/m²
214.3
cd/m²
204.7
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 220.1 cd/m² Medel: 210.1 cd/m² Minimum: 14.94 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 220.1 cd/m²
Kontrast: 759:1 (Svärta: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.4 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 4.09
ΔE Greyscale 12 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
57.5% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 36.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.09
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
AU Optronics B156XW02 V0, TN LED, 15.6, 1366x768
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD
AU Optronics B156HAN06.1, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
AUO, B156HW01, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM
Chi Mei CMN15D5, TN LED, 15.6, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh
Sharp SHP149A LQ156M1, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
-33%
-43%
4%
-55%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
43.6 (20, 23.6)
32 (19.2, 12.8)
27%
41 (19, 22)
6%
44 (23, 21)
-1%
49 (25, 40)
-12%
Response Time Black / White *
15.2 (10, 5.2)
29.2 (17.2, 12)
-92%
29 (17, 12)
-91%
14 (10, 4)
8%
30 (16, 14)
-97%
PWM Frequency
25000 (10)
961 (10)
Screen
23%
29%
-4%
60%
Brightness middle
220.1
240.1
9%
251
14%
234
6%
413
88%
Brightness
210
233
11%
240
14%
211
0%
378
80%
Brightness Distribution
93
91
-2%
84
-10%
83
-11%
86
-8%
Black Level *
0.29
0.23
21%
0.2
31%
0.43
-48%
0.29
-0%
Contrast
759
1044
38%
1255
65%
544
-28%
1424
88%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
11.4
4.25
63%
5.25
54%
11.27
1%
2.44
79%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
25.96
17.84
31%
10.04
61%
18.03
31%
4.46
83%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.09
4
2%
2.48
39%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
12
2.8
77%
3.28
73%
11.54
4%
2.48
79%
Gamma
2.09 105%
2.3 96%
2.15 102%
2.09 105%
2.43 91%
CCT
12625 51%
6503 100%
6502 100%
11607 56%
7006 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36.5
36.8
1%
35
-4%
38
4%
62
70%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
57.5
57.8
1%
55
-4%
60
4%
96
67%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-5% / 14%
-7% / 17%
0% / -3%
3% / 43%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8943 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Core i5-8300H
171 Points ∼80% +19%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-8259U
154 Points ∼72% +7%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Core i7-8550U
149 Points ∼70% +3%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
Intel Core i5-8250U
144 Points ∼67%
HP ZBook 14u G4
Intel Core i7-7500U
142 Points ∼66% -1%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
142 Points ∼66% -1%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (81 - 147, n=84)
141 Points ∼66% -2%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
134 Points ∼63% -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼60% -10%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel Atom x7-Z8750
38.9 Points ∼18% -73%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Core i5-8300H
818 Points ∼19% +53%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-8259U
687 Points ∼16% +28%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-8259U
608 Points ∼14% +13%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
623 Points ∼14% +16%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
618 Points ∼14% +15%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (320 - 730, n=87)
569 Points ∼13% +6%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
Intel Core i5-8250U
536 Points ∼12%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Core i7-8550U
523 Points ∼12% -2%
HP ZBook 14u G4
Intel Core i7-7500U
349 Points ∼8% -35%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼8% -38%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel Atom x7-Z8750
133 (min: 112.75, max: 133) Points ∼3% -75%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
Intel Core i5-8250U
1.64 Points ∼67%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (0.91 - 1.79, n=33)
1.614 Points ∼66% -2%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
1.61 Points ∼66% -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
6.91 Points ∼26% +18%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (3.15 - 7.76, n=33)
6.02 Points ∼22% +3%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
Intel Core i5-8250U
5.86 Points ∼22%
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.64 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
5.86 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
44.22 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
144 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
536 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
48.26 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Hjälp
PCMark 10 - Score
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8550U, SK hynix PC300 HFS512GD9MND
4458 Points ∼57% +37%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
3938 Points ∼51% +21%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba MQ04ABF100
3250 Points ∼42%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (0 - 4081, n=56)
3248 Points ∼42% 0%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM
Vega 3, 2200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
3064 Points ∼39% -6%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
Vega 8, 2500U, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
2814 Points ∼36% -13%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix SC311 SATA
2208 Points ∼28% -32%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba MQ04ABF100
4654 Points ∼71%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2699 - 5106, n=49)
4644 Points ∼71% 0%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM
Vega 3, 2200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4592 Points ∼70% -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix SC311 SATA
4556 Points ∼70% -2%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
4323 Points ∼66% -7%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8550U, SK hynix PC300 HFS512GD9MND
4188 Points ∼69% +14%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba MQ04ABF100
3675 Points ∼60%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2986 - 4458, n=59)
3600 Points ∼59% -2%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
3482 Points ∼57% -5%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM
Vega 3, 2200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
3457 Points ∼57% -6%
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
Vega 8, 2500U, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
3385 Points ∼56% -8%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix SC311 SATA
3370 Points ∼55% -8%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3675 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4654 poäng
Hjälp
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
Toshiba MQ04ABF100
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
Dell G3 15 3579
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD
SK hynix PC300 HFS512GD9MND
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
SK hynix SC311 SATA
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-22%
-44%
6194%
3535%
Write 4K
3.885
1.168
-70%
0.202
-95%
95.91
2369%
48.25
1142%
Read 4K
0.426
0.536
26%
0.461
8%
31.32
7252%
23.77
5480%
Write Seq
121
114.1
-6%
53.48
-56%
745.5
516%
444.9
268%
Read Seq
142.6
114.9
-19%
107.2
-25%
1347
845%
497.5
249%
Write 4K Q32T1
4.249
1.212
-71%
0.882
-79%
294.6
6833%
223.5
5160%
Read 4K Q32T1
1.106
1.189
8%
1.057
-4%
334
30099%
171.8
15433%
Write Seq Q32T1
134.3
113.2
-16%
63.74
-53%
765.9
470%
510.9
280%
Read Seq Q32T1
149.8
114.1
-24%
77.14
-49%
1896
1166%
552.8
269%
Write 4K Q8T8
310.2
Read 4K Q8T8
349.5
Toshiba MQ04ABF100
Överföringshastighet min.: 60.7 MB/s
Överföringshastighet max.: 144.3 MB/s
Överföringshastighet med.: 110.4 MB/s
Accesstid: 19.4 ms
Burst rate: 175.4 MB/s
CPU-användning: 2.2 %
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
4296 Points ∼24% +186%
Dell Latitude 5491
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, 8850H
2958 Points ∼16% +97%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, 2700U
2734 Points ∼15% +82%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
2683 Points ∼15% +79%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 8550U
2395 Points ∼13% +60%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
1838 Points ∼10% +22%
Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1540 Points ∼8% +3%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1501 Points ∼8%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (959 - 1928, n=103)
1497 Points ∼8% 0%
HP Stream 14-ax002ng
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
395 Points ∼2% -74%
1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
4708 Points ∼9% +183%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, 2700U
3728 Points ∼7% +124%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
3549 Points ∼7% +113%
Dell Latitude 5491
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, 8850H
3041 Points ∼6% +83%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 8550U
2613 Points ∼5% +57%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
2124 Points ∼4% +27%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 1979, n=103)
1680 Points ∼3% +1%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1666 Points ∼3%
Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1589 Points ∼3% -5%
HP Stream 14-ax002ng
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
381 Points ∼1% -77%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
3622 Points ∼9%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, 2700U
2442 Points ∼6%
Dell Latitude 5491
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, 8850H
2427 Points ∼6%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
2310 Points ∼6%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 8550U
2069 Points ∼5%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
1369 Points ∼3%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
1284 Points ∼3%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1336, n=84)
1083 Points ∼3%
Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1058 Points ∼3%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
19900 Points ∼11% +132%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, 2700U
15613 Points ∼8% +82%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
15186 Points ∼8% +77%
Dell Latitude 5491
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, 8850H
14807 Points ∼8% +73%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7560U
11232 Points ∼6% +31%
Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 8550U
10816 Points ∼6% +26%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
10131 Points ∼5% +18%
Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
8893 Points ∼5% +4%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11294, n=93)
8858 Points ∼5% +3%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
8567 Points ∼5%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
68150 Points ∼9%
Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
51580 Points ∼7%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (30939 - 59483, n=28)
45012 Points ∼6%
3DMark 11 Performance
1840 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
7721 poäng
Hjälp
låg med. hög ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 39.218.315.7fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 23.316.4fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 10.46.5fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
31.7 / 31.7 / 32 dB(A)
Hög belastning
32.8 / 35 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba MQ04ABF100
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8550U, SK hynix PC300 HFS512GD9MND
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix SC311 SATA
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM
Vega 3, 2200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
Vega 8, 2500U, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
Noise
-8%
3%
-5%
0%
-9%
off / environment *
28.2
29.2
-4%
30.4
-8%
30.3
-7%
29.7
-5%
28.5
-1%
Idle Minimum *
31.7
29.3
8%
30.4
4%
30.3
4%
30.3
4%
32.3
-2%
Idle Average *
31.7
29.5
7%
30.4
4%
30.3
4%
30.3
4%
32.4
-2%
Idle Maximum *
32
30.5
5%
31.2
2%
30.9
3%
31.1
3%
34.2
-7%
Load Average *
32.8
41.2
-26%
31.5
4%
37.8
-15%
34.9
-6%
36.2
-10%
Load Maximum *
35
47.2
-35%
31.5
10%
40.6
-16%
34.9
-0%
45.3
-29%
Witcher 3 ultra *
44
34.3
42.8

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 30.6 °C32.2 °C25 °C 
 30 °C35.8 °C23 °C 
 24.8 °C22.6 °C23.8 °C 
Max: 35.8 °C
Medel: 27.5 °C
28.2 °C41.2 °C31.6 °C
25 °C37.8 °C41.4 °C
27.6 °C26.8 °C27.2 °C
Max: 41.4 °C
Medel: 31.9 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  42 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.8 °C / 80.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.1 °C / 84.4 F (+2.3 °C / 4.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.239.92534.7393132.735.54031.734.35033.133.26332.832.18031.131.310030.330.512528.62916027.932.120026.645.925026.756.831526.162.740025.365.150024.965.863024.265.980024.861.6100024.764.612502470.3160025.972.120002465.7250023.960.6315024.362.5400023.967.1500023.364.5630023.363800023.159.51000023.1601250023.261.31600023.256.7SPL36.478.2N2.742.3median 24.3median 62.5Delta1.16.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion 15-cs0053clApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.06 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.26 / 0.43 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 5.6 / 7.1 / 7.9 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 32.8 / 30.5 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba MQ04ABF100, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD
8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), SK hynix PC300 HFS512GD9MND, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 SATA, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM
2200U, Vega 3, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
2500U, Vega 8, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-80%
4%
-19%
-32%
-17%
Idle Minimum *
5.6
5.1
9%
3.9
30%
5.6
-0%
5.9
-5%
3.7
34%
Idle Average *
7.1
6.3
11%
6.6
7%
8.5
-20%
8.7
-23%
8.5
-20%
Idle Maximum *
7.9
10.5
-33%
9.3
-18%
8.4
-6%
10.5
-33%
10
-27%
Load Average *
32.8
82.2
-151%
30.2
8%
41
-25%
45.7
-39%
36
-10%
Load Maximum *
30.5
103.2
-238%
33.2
-9%
44.2
-45%
49.4
-62%
48.7
-60%
Witcher 3 ultra *
85.9
32
45.8

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
12tim 02min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6tim 59min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 14min
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 41 Wh
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD
8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 48 Wh
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM
2200U, Vega 3, 37 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 97 Wh
HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx
2500U, Vega 8, 55.8 Wh
Battery Runtime
-24%
-7%
-27%
-3%
-19%
Reader / Idle
722
671
-7%
536
-26%
655
-9%
WiFi v1.3
419
318
-24%
435
4%
344
-18%
576
37%
398
-5%
Load
134
110
-18%
83
-38%
76
-43%
77
-43%
Witcher 3 ultra
62

För

+ Alternativ för GeForce MX150 och AMD Ryzen 5
+ relativt svala kärntemperaturer
+ bra Turbo Boost-prestanda
+ tjusigare, Envy-liknande design
+ fullstort numeriskt tangentbord
+ smal infattning
+ USB Typ C
+ tyst fläkt

Emot

- mörk bakgrundsbelysning; dålig synlighet utomhus
- långsam primär HDD
- systemets fläkt är alltid aktiv
- ingen laddning via USB Typ C
- tangentbordet har mjuk återkoppling
- svår att underhålla
- mjuka styrplatteknappar
- locket tenderar att gunga
- 1x1 WLAN-modul
- dålig 768p-skärm
- långsam SD-kortläsare
Recenseras: HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
Recenseras: HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Känslan av oattraktiv budget-design var en av nyckelfaktorerna som talade mot tidigare Pavilion 15-modeller. En snabb titt på den gamla Pavilion 15 från 2015 jämfört med en MacBook Pro visar varför Pavilion bara kostade hälften så mycket. Denna skillnad finns även mellan den nya Pavilion 15 från 2018 och Apples senaste motsvarighet, men det är inte i närheten så dåligt som det brukade vara. För målgruppen studenter och yngre användare kan denna märkbara visuella uppgradering göra Pavilion värd att överväga.

På insidan imponerades vi av förmågan att upprätthålla Turbo Boost, dom låga kärntemperaturerna och den i allmänhet tysta fläkten. Dessa aspekter är inte så vanliga som vi hade önskat, särskilt när det kommer till dyrare Ultrabook-modeller där kylningen oftast hamnar i skymundan till förmån för liten storlek och låg vikt.

De sämsta aspekterna av nya Pavilion är dess mjuka tangentbordsknappar, mjuka styrplatteknappar och gungande skärm. Dessa aspekter i kombination gör att Pavilion känns som en billig, plastig laptop trots den nya visuella designen.

I det lägre skiktet runt 4.000 - 7.000 kronor kan Pavilion 15 vara värd en titt för den som behöver tänka på budgeten. Undvik dom dyrare varianterna till varje pris då det i så fall är bättre att investera pengarna i någon Envy- eller Spectre-modell.

HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl - 08/05/2018 v6
Allen Ngo

Design
77 / 98 → 78%
Tangentbord
74%
Mus
81%
Anslutningar
46 / 81 → 57%
Vikt
66 / 20-67 → 97%
Batteri
89%
Skärm
73%
Spelprestanda
54 / 85 → 64%
Programprestanda
90 / 92 → 97%
Temperatur
93%
Ljudnivå
90 / 95 → 95%
Audio
60%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Medel
72%
79%
Multimedia - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl (i5-8250U, HD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Allen Ngo, 2018-08- 8 (Update: 2018-08- 8)