Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Alienware m15 P79F (i7-8750H, RTX 2070 Max-Q, OLED) (Sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
| Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
| Alienware m15 P79F | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
| Alienware m15 P79F | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 452.1 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.34 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
91% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
100% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
| Alienware m15 P79F Samsung SDCA029, 156WR04, OLED, 15.60, 3840x2160 | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q AU Optronics B156HAN, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Aorus 15 W9 LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2 (LGD05E8), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD LQ156D1, IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160 | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -27% | -26% | -25% | -14% | -26% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 63.5 -36% | 64.9 -35% | 64.3 -36% | 79.6 -20% | 63.5 -36% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 89.4 -11% | 91 -9% | 93.5 -6% | 98.4 -2% | 92.4 -8% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 100 | 64.5 -35% | 65.9 -34% | 65.6 -34% | 79.7 -20% | 64.7 -35% |
| Response Times | -507% | -230% | -502% | -543% | -549% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.6 ? | 18 ? -592% | 7.2 ? -177% | 16.8 ? -546% | 52.4 ? -1915% | 18.8 ? -623% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 2.3 ? | 12 ? -422% | 8.8 ? -283% | 12.8 ? -457% | 31.6 ? -1274% | 13.2 ? -474% |
| PWM Frequency | 60.2 ? | 1000 ? 1561% | ||||
| Screen | -9% | 4% | -15% | -28% | -4% | |
| Brightness middle | 452.1 | 353.6 -22% | 286 -37% | 295 -35% | 451.9 0% | 320.4 -29% |
| Brightness | 452 | 346 -23% | 275 -39% | 292 -35% | 414 -8% | 298 -34% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 86 -4% | 90 0% | 80 -11% | 81 -10% | 85 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.37 | 0.34 | 0.36 | 0.42 | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.34 | 4.55 28% | 2.19 65% | 3.89 39% | 5.62 11% | 3.21 49% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.97 | 7.91 39% | 4.4 66% | 7.28 44% | 19.1 -47% | 5.54 57% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 4.1 -46% | 2.2 21% | 4.98 -78% | 6.9 -146% | 3.6 -29% |
| Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.27 97% | 2.41 91% | 2.45 90% | 2.2 100% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6114 106% | 7434 87% | 6405 101% | 6407 101% | 6254 104% | 6503 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 91 | 57.9 -36% | 59 -35% | 60 -34% | 71.8 -21% | 59 -35% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 88.9 -11% | 91 -9% | 93 -7% | 98.5 -1% | 92 -8% |
| Contrast | 1179 | 773 | 868 | 1255 | 763 | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.37 | 2.27 | 1.44 | 2.69 | 2.36 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -181% /
-90% | -84% /
-39% | -181% /
-92% | -195% /
-135% | -193% /
-93% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60.2 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 60.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 60.2 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3570 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4465 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5485 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Alienware m15 P79F Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0) | Aorus 15 W9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -24% | 36% | 8% | 21% | 31% | |
| Seq Read | 1937 | 1967 2% | 1832 -5% | 2506 29% | 2611 35% | 1320 -32% |
| Seq Write | 1066 | 1135 6% | 1864 75% | 1712 61% | 1545 45% | 1500 41% |
| 4K Read | 31.76 | 29.17 -8% | 52.1 64% | 48.32 52% | 55.2 74% | 30.73 -3% |
| 4K Write | 102.6 | 93.4 -9% | 108.3 6% | 103.6 1% | 111.9 9% | 94.4 -8% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1140 | 995 -13% | 1159 2% | 624 -45% | 884 -22% | 1453 27% |
| 4K-64 Write | 938 | 656 -30% | 1807 93% | 1253 34% | 941 0% | 1815 93% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.058 | 0.116 -100% | 0.05 14% | 0.08 -38% | 0.045 22% | 0.061 -5% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.04 | 0.063 -58% | 0.034 15% | 0.04 -0% | 0.033 17% | 0.044 -10% |
| Score Read | 1366 | 1221 -11% | 1394 2% | 923 -32% | 1200 -12% | 1616 18% |
| Score Write | 1147 | 862 -25% | 2102 83% | 1528 33% | 1207 5% | 2059 80% |
| Score Total | 3168 | 2667 -16% | 4221 33% | 2896 -9% | 2982 -6% | 4507 42% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 946 | 642 -32% | 2083 120% | 2131 125% | 2577 172% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 452.8 | 431.5 -5% | 496.5 10% | 407.2 -10% | 515 14% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1013 | 706 -30% | 977 -4% | 1094 8% | 1120 11% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 19009 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 24876 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 16197 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6901 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Alienware m15 P79F | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (57 - 89, n=12) | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | 4K | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 296.7 | 261.5 | 243.7 | 153.7 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 261.8 | 200.6 | 123.8 | 64.4 | 47.2 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 204.7 | 162.3 | 125.8 | 105.7 | 45.6 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 119 | 93 | 87 | 84 | 33 |
| Alienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0) | Aorus 15 W9 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 13% | 17% | 1% | -1% | 15% | |
| off / environment * | 28.2 | 28.6 -1% | 28.3 -0% | 30 -6% | 29 -3% | 28.2 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.3 | 28.6 6% | 28.8 5% | 31 -2% | 34 -12% | 28.5 6% |
| Idle Average * | 35.4 | 28.6 19% | 28.8 19% | 33 7% | 36 -2% | 28.6 19% |
| Idle Maximum * | 50.3 | 28.6 43% | 29 42% | 38 24% | 38 24% | 28.8 43% |
| Load Average * | 50.3 | 40.8 19% | 33.5 33% | 50 1% | 52 -3% | 36.2 28% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 50.2 | 49.6 1% | 45 10% | 53 -6% | 52 -4% | 47.6 5% |
| Load Maximum * | 50.2 | 49.6 1% | 45.2 10% | 56 -12% | 53 -6% | 47.6 5% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 30.3 / 35.4 / 50.3 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 50.3 / 50.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55.6 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 62.4 °C / 144 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.2 °C / 95.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.3 °C / -11.4 F).
Alienware m15 P79F audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.04 / 0.11 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 10.9 / 12.3 / 19 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
96 / 229.1 Watt |
   
| |
| Alienware m15 P79F i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Aorus 15 W9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 12% | -6% | -59% | -21% | 20% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 10.9 | 7.6 30% | 12.5 -15% | 24 -120% | 18 -65% | 7.1 35% |
| Idle Average * | 12.3 | 13.8 -12% | 15.3 -24% | 27 -120% | 20 -63% | 13.6 -11% |
| Idle Maximum * | 19 | 14.6 23% | 20.7 -9% | 33 -74% | 28 -47% | 14.1 26% |
| Load Average * | 96 | 97.6 -2% | 90.2 6% | 129 -34% | 87 9% | 103.9 -8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 161.7 | 145.8 10% | 162 -0% | 176 -9% | 135 17% | 103 36% |
| Load Maximum * | 229.1 | 172.5 25% | 209.3 9% | 216 6% | 175 24% | 130.9 43% |
* ... smaller is better
| Alienware m15 P79F i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 90 Wh | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 90 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 76 Wh | Aorus 15 W9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 62 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 97 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 50% | 27% | -29% | -54% | 66% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 309 | 463 50% | 393 27% | 220 -29% | 141 -54% | 514 66% |
| Reader / Idle | 627 | 953 | 353 | 176 | 899 | |
| Load | 103 | 102 | 62 | 81 | 62 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Alienware m15 kan krama mer ur samma CPU och GPU än andra bärbara speldatorer. Dess Core i7-8750H och RTX 2070 Max-Q är till exempel båda 8 till 9 procent snabbare än genomsnittet för i7-8750H eller RTX 2070 Max-Q i vår databas. Om du vill ha snabbast möjliga prestanda i ett chassi med tunn design bör Alienware m15 passa perfekt.
Nackdelarna är högre kärntemperaturer och mer högljudda fläktar, vilket är ett direkt resultat av att datorn försöker krama ur varje liten MHz ur processorn. Förvänta dig CPU-temperaturer så höga som 90 C och fläktar som låter så mycket som 50 dB(A) om du vill få ut mesta möjliga ur Alienware m15.
Jokern i leken är dock OLED-skärmen med 4K UHD-upplösning. Även om den kostar två gånger så mycket som IPS-skärmarna på 1080p och 144 eller 240 Hz så vill vi vara tydliga med att den inte objektivt sett erbjuder den bästa spelupplevelsen eller automatiskt gör IPS-varianterna onödiga. En högre upplösning, djupare färger, högre ljusstyrka och snabbare svart-vita responstider ger den onekligen en fördel, men en bilduppdateringsfrekvens på 60 Hz är en nackdel i en del titlar där 144 Hz är att föredra. Overwatch, Rocket League, CS:GO och Apex Legends, till exempel, passar antagligen bättre i 144 Hz medans singelplayerspel som Shadow of the Tomb Raider eller Metro Exodus kan dra mer nytta av OLED-skärmen. Trots att den imponerar så är OLED för tillfället inte för alla, i synnerhet då IPS-alternativen har blivit mer prisvärda.
Beroende på vilka spel du spelar mest kan du vilja välja med omsorg mellan 1080p 144/240 Hz IPS eller 2160p 60 Hz OLED. Det är en utmärkt start för OLED, men det är fortfarande ett nischalternativ tills fler alternativ för upplösning och bilduppdatering blir tillgängliga och kan utmana IPS.
Alienware m15 P79F
-
06/13/2019 v6(old)
Allen Ngo
Pricecompare
