Notebookcheck

Test: Nokia 8.1 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Felicitas Krohn (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 02/11/2019

Rum för förbättring. HMD Global tänker sig Nokia 8.1 som en enhet i det övre mittenskiktet. Men företaget har satt ett pris på 4.000 kronor på 8.1, vilket gör att den hamnar mitt i siktet på förra årets flaggskepp. Läs vidare för att se vad Nokia 8.1 har att sätta emot den starka oppositionen.

Nokia 8.1 (8 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 616
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
6.18 tum 18,7:9, 2246 x 1080 pixlar 408 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD-kort på upp till 400 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Kompass, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, USB Typ C
Nätverk
Qualcomm Wi-Fi B/G/N/AC (2x2) (b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS: 850, 900, 1,900, 2,100 MHz. LTE: Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20., Dual SIM, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8 x 154.8 x 75.8
Batteri
13.3 Wh, 3500 mAh Litiumjon, Snabbladdare på 18 W
Operativsystem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix , f/1.8, Fasdetekterande autofokus (Dual-pixel) (PDAF), OIS, dubbel LED-blixt, Video i upp till 2160p/30 FPS (Huvudkamera). 13.0 MP, f/2.4, Skärpedjup (Sekundär kamera)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix , f/2.0
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare på enhetens undersida, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Snabbladdare, USB Typ C-kabel, Hörlurar, SIM-verktyg, Android One, Nokia Mobile Care, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: Kropp – 1.490 W/kg, Huvud - 0.514 W/kg; FM-radio; LTE Cat. 6 – upp till 300 MBit/s nedladdning och 50 MBit/s uppladdning; VoLTE, VoWiFi., fanless
Vikt
180 g, Strömförsörjning: 72 g
Pris
400 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Nokia 8.1
Nokia 8.1
Nokia 8.1
Nokia 8.1
Nokia 8.1
Nokia 8.1
Nokia 8.1
Nokia 8.1
Nokia 8.1

Storleksjämförelse

162.5 mm 77 mm 7.8 mm 183 g153 mm 72 mm 11.1 mm 198 g154.8 mm 75.8 mm 8 mm 180 g150.9 mm 74.9 mm 8.1 mm 189 g140.9 mm 72.97 mm 7.5 mm 176 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
669 MBit/s ∼100% +114%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
654 MBit/s ∼98% +110%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
584 (min: 557, max: 605) MBit/s ∼87% +87%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 273, max: 341) MBit/s ∼47%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
278 MBit/s ∼42% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=367)
219 MBit/s ∼33% -30%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
668 MBit/s ∼100% +123%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 MBit/s ∼95% +111%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
550 MBit/s ∼82% +83%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
300 (min: 169, max: 367) MBit/s ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
285 (min: 249, max: 304) MBit/s ∼43% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=367)
210 MBit/s ∼31% -30%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø311 (273-341)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø294 (169-367)
GPS-test: Nokia 8.1 - Översikt
GPS-test: Nokia 8.1 - Översikt
GPS-test: Nokia 8.1 - Slinga
GPS-test: Nokia 8.1 - Slinga
GPS-test: Nokia 8.1 - Bro
GPS-test: Nokia 8.1 - Bro
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Slinga
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Slinga
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bro
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Foto taget med det bakåtriktade kameran
Foto taget med det bakåtriktade kameran
Foto taget med den bakåtriktade kameran med Live-Bokeh aktiverat
Foto taget med den bakåtriktade kameran med Live-Bokeh aktiverat
Foto taget med den bakåtriktade kameran med en smalare betraktningsvinkel
Foto taget med den bakåtriktade kameran med en smalare betraktningsvinkel
Foto av vår testkarta
Foto av vår testkarta
Testkartan i detalj
Testkartan i detalj
ColorChecker Passport: Den lägre halvan av varje färgområde visar referensfärgen
ColorChecker Passport: Den lägre halvan av varje färgområde visar referensfärgen
523
cd/m²
543
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
566
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
553
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 567 cd/m² Medel: 547.2 cd/m² Minimum: 4.88 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 567 cd/m²
Kontrast: 930:1 (Svärta: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.39 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.248
Nokia 8.1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
OLED, 2220x1080, 6.3
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Sony Xperia XZ2
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
Nokia 8 Sirocco
P-OLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
25%
4%
35%
-5%
Brightness middle
567
553
-2%
492
-13%
630
11%
576
2%
Brightness
547
553
1%
463
-15%
632
16%
597
9%
Brightness Distribution
92
96
4%
90
-2%
96
4%
85
-8%
Black Level *
0.61
0.59
3%
0.44
28%
Contrast
930
834
-10%
1432
54%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.39
2.2
50%
2.4
45%
1.5
66%
5
-14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.28
5.1
30%
6.2
15%
4.3
41%
8
-10%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.9
1.7
65%
4.5
8%
2.1
57%
5.4
-10%
Gamma
2.248 98%
2.06 107%
2.25 98%
2.17 101%
2.3 96%
CCT
7642 85%
6434 101%
6395 102%
6513 100%
7730 84%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 75.76 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 75.76 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 75.76 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9705 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.7 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6813 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5542 Points ∼39% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
14362 Points ∼100% +111%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
7865 Points ∼55% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (6601 - 6813, n=3)
6730 Points ∼47% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (870 - 21070, n=251)
4624 Points ∼32% -32%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5856 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5826 Points ∼65% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8937 Points ∼100% +53%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8510 Points ∼95% +45%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
6701 Points ∼75% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (5754 - 5856, n=3)
5818 Points ∼65% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=304)
4449 Points ∼50% -24%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1799 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1601 Points ∼65% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2456 Points ∼100% +37%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2464 Points ∼100% +37%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
1952 Points ∼79% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1799 - 1829, n=3)
1814 Points ∼74% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (437 - 4824, n=305)
1309 Points ∼53% -27%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6887 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5789 Points ∼72% -16%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8078 Points ∼100% +17%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8069 Points ∼100% +17%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
7193 Points ∼89% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (6419 - 6887, n=4)
6682 Points ∼83% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2828 - 9868, n=314)
4804 Points ∼59% -30%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8309 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
6338 Points ∼68% -24%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9179 Points ∼98% +10%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
9319 Points ∼100% +12%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
7925 Points ∼85% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (7154 - 8414, n=4)
7874 Points ∼84% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2695 - 13531, n=483)
5234 Points ∼56% -37%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2534 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2774 Points ∼78% +9%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2246 Points ∼64% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3537 Points ∼100% +40%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
2382 Points ∼67% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1836 - 2534, n=4)
2199 Points ∼62% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4439, n=329)
1779 Points ∼50% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1845 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1268 Points ∼22% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4621 Points ∼81% +150%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5690 Points ∼100% +208%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
4187 Points ∼74% +127%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1845 - 1871, n=4)
1862 Points ∼33% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=329)
1518 Points ∼27% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1964 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1433 Points ∼29% -27%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3742 Points ∼75% +91%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5012 Points ∼100% +155%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
3584 Points ∼72% +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1862 - 1981, n=4)
1921 Points ∼38% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 5913, n=332)
1415 Points ∼28% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2516 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2645 Points ∼75% +5%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2270 Points ∼64% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3540 Points ∼100% +41%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
2119 Points ∼60% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1846 - 2526, n=4)
2268 Points ∼64% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=344)
1756 Points ∼50% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2855 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1757 Points ∼21% -38%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5228 Points ∼64% +83%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8233 Points ∼100% +188%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
4514 Points ∼55% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2855 - 2887, n=4)
2874 Points ∼35% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=344)
2093 Points ∼25% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2772 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1898 Points ∼30% -32%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4054 Points ∼64% +46%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
6359 Points ∼100% +129%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
3608 Points ∼57% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2554 - 2798, n=4)
2704 Points ∼43% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 7856, n=345)
1778 Points ∼28% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2514 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2073 Points ∼57% -18%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2606 Points ∼72% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3630 Points ∼100% +44%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
2946 Points ∼81% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2054 - 2514, n=4)
2359 Points ∼65% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4216, n=405)
1711 Points ∼47% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1702 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1185 Points ∼23% -30%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5181 Points ∼100% +204%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5122 Points ∼99% +201%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
3926 Points ∼76% +131%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1701 - 1714, n=4)
1707 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6355, n=407)
1248 Points ∼24% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1834 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1354 Points ∼29% -26%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4248 Points ∼91% +132%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
4693 Points ∼100% +156%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
3656 Points ∼78% +99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1774 - 1836, n=4)
1816 Points ∼39% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5509, n=415)
1194 Points ∼25% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2467 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2741 Points ∼75% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2159 Points ∼59% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3642 Points ∼100% +48%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
2287 Points ∼63% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1878 - 2495, n=4)
2320 Points ∼64% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4215, n=438)
1615 Points ∼44% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1918 Points ∼24% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6630 Points ∼82% +140%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8122 Points ∼100% +194%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
4511 Points ∼56% +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2745 - 2767, n=4)
2758 Points ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 9963, n=438)
1696 Points ∼21% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2691 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2054 Points ∼32% -24%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4540 Points ∼71% +69%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
6378 Points ∼100% +137%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
3709 Points ∼58% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2490 - 2694, n=4)
2636 Points ∼41% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7166, n=446)
1455 Points ∼23% -46%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14820 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
18523 Points ∼52% +25%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
30245 Points ∼84% +104%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
35856 Points ∼100% +142%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
21407 Points ∼60% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (13687 - 14820, n=4)
14425 Points ∼40% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3958 - 37475, n=598)
13315 Points ∼37% -10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
39655 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
29065 Points ∼36% -27%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
76078 Points ∼95% +92%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
80233 Points ∼100% +102%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
58018 Points ∼72% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (38163 - 39655, n=4)
38975 Points ∼49% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1152 - 162695, n=598)
19049 Points ∼24% -52%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
28895 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
25783 Points ∼41% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
56913 Points ∼90% +97%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
62926 Points ∼100% +118%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
42040 Points ∼67% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (27310 - 28895, n=4)
28271 Points ∼45% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2915 - 77599, n=599)
15969 Points ∼25% -45%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
65 fps ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
46 fps ∼31% -29%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
150 fps ∼100% +131%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
150 fps ∼100% +131%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
106 fps ∼71% +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (65 - 65, n=3)
65 fps ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.4 - 251, n=622)
33.1 fps ∼22% -49%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
57 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
50 fps ∼83% -12%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +5%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (55 - 57, n=3)
56 fps ∼93% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11 - 120, n=625)
26 fps ∼43% -54%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
32 fps ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
23 fps ∼28% -28%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
74 fps ∼90% +131%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
82 fps ∼100% +156%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
54 fps ∼66% +69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (32 - 33, n=3)
32.3 fps ∼39% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 132, n=541)
18 fps ∼22% -44%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
31 fps ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
21 fps ∼36% -32%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +90%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
59 fps ∼100% +90%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
37 fps ∼63% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (29 - 31, n=3)
30.3 fps ∼51% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 115, n=546)
16.9 fps ∼29% -45%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
23 fps ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
15 fps ∼25% -35%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +161%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +161%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
41 fps ∼68% +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (23 - 23, n=3)
23 fps ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.3 - 88, n=403)
15.1 fps ∼25% -34%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
22 fps ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
14 fps ∼25% -36%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
55 fps ∼100% +150%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
55 fps ∼100% +150%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
24 fps ∼44% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (20 - 22, n=3)
21.3 fps ∼39% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.8 - 110, n=406)
14.6 fps ∼27% -34%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8.2 fps ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
3 fps ∼32% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (5.9 - 8.4, n=3)
7.5 fps ∼80% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.7 - 59, n=107)
9.34 fps ∼100% +14%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5 fps ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
4.8 fps ∼75% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (5 - 7.8, n=3)
6 fps ∼93% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 31, n=107)
6.44 fps ∼100% +29%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
7.5 fps ∼55% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (12 - 13, n=3)
12.7 fps ∼93% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.5 - 59, n=108)
13.7 fps ∼100% +5%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14 fps ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.6 fps ∼57% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (14 - 14, n=3)
14 fps ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.75 - 63, n=107)
15.2 fps ∼100% +9%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
9.1 fps ∼26% -30%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100% +169%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
35 fps ∼100% +169%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
26 fps ∼74% +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (13 - 13, n=3)
13 fps ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.6 - 54, n=332)
10.3 fps ∼29% -21%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.3 fps ∼24% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34 fps ∼100% +183%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
33 fps ∼97% +175%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
15 fps ∼44% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (12 - 13, n=3)
12.3 fps ∼36% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 58, n=336)
9.3 fps ∼27% -22%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14.3 fps ∼47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (14.3 - 15.5, n=3)
14.9 fps ∼49% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.98 - 651, n=46)
30.6 fps ∼100% +114%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12.1 fps ∼43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (10.1 - 12.1, n=2)
11.1 fps ∼40% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.1 - 606, n=42)
28 fps ∼100% +131%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (11.4 - 13, n=3)
12.2 fps ∼36% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11.4 - 739, n=41)
34.2 fps ∼100% +163%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
169262 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
140878 Points ∼53% -17%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
266601 Points ∼100% +58%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
266981 Points ∼100% +58%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
209729 Points ∼79% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (155493 - 169262, n=4)
162648 Points ∼61% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (41483 - 374820, n=226)
124968 Points ∼47% -26%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
135848 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
116969 Points ∼52% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
162183 Points ∼72% +19%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
225663 Points ∼100% +66%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
185487 Points ∼82% +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (135848 - 137693, n=3)
136892 Points ∼61% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23275 - 274007, n=437)
81300 Points ∼36% -40%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1681 Score ∼86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1681 - 1708, n=3)
1699 Score ∼87% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1029 - 5025, n=46)
1962 Score ∼100% +17%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1077 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1105 Points ∼82% +3%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1234 Points ∼92% +15%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
1346 Points ∼100% +25%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
1202 Points ∼89% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1070 - 1100, n=4)
1086 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=555)
720 Points ∼53% -33%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
3086 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2332 Points ∼29% -24%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7918 Points ∼100% +157%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7868 Points ∼99% +155%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
6084 Points ∼77% +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2980 - 3102, n=4)
3056 Points ∼39% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=555)
1840 Points ∼23% -40%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2947 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2393 Points ∼76% -19%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3012 Points ∼95% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2193 Points ∼69% -26%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
3162 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2947 - 3518, n=4)
3133 Points ∼99% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 6283, n=555)
1351 Points ∼43% -54%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5681 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5063 Points ∼60% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5792 Points ∼69% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8402 Points ∼100% +48%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
5888 Points ∼70% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (5603 - 5782, n=4)
5682 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=555)
2705 Points ∼32% -52%
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2731 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2364 Points ∼63% -13%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3614 Points ∼97% +32%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3738 Points ∼100% +37%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
3416 Points ∼91% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2731 - 2843, n=4)
2771 Points ∼74% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=559)
1342 Points ∼36% -51%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
482 Points ∼65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (479 - 488, n=3)
483 Points ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (36.3 - 2754, n=85)
744 Points ∼100% +54%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
89.54 Points ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
69.765 Points ∼78% +6%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
66.048 Points ∼74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (65.3 - 66, n=3)
65.8 Points ∼73% 0%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)
62.157 Points ∼69% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
51.786 Points ∼58% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 273, n=470)
37.8 Points ∼42% -43%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
16774 Points ∼100% +32%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
14491 Points ∼86% +14%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
12717 Points ∼76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (12209 - 12802, n=3)
12576 Points ∼75% -1%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)
11544 Points ∼69% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
10145 Points ∼60% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (4865 - 43280, n=615)
5910 Points ∼35% -54%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=634)
11105 ms * ∼100% -266%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)
4812.6 ms * ∼43% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
3841.8 (min: 1) ms * ∼35% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (3035 - 3177, n=3)
3090 ms * ∼28% -2%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
3034.9 ms * ∼27%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
2868 ms * ∼26% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
2394.3 ms * ∼22% +21%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
98 Points ∼100% +36%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)
77 Points ∼79% +7%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
72 Points ∼73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (70 - 72, n=3)
71 Points ∼72% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (24 - 161, n=91)
64.2 Points ∼66% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
59 Points ∼60% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Points ∼0% -100%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
262 Points ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
228 Points ∼87% +9%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
209 Points ∼80%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)
204 Points ∼78% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (189 - 209, n=3)
199 Points ∼76% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
167 Points ∼64% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 362, n=312)
117 Points ∼45% -44%

* ... smaller is better

Nokia 8.1Samsung Galaxy A9 2018Xiaomi Mi Mix 2SSony Xperia XZ2Nokia 8 SiroccoAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
46%
481%
47%
119%
26%
0%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
58.27 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
30.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-48%
55.7 (58.4 - 74.7, n=92)
-4%
47.4 (9.5 - 87.1, n=369)
-19%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
34.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-60%
73.9 (81.2 - 87.2, n=92)
-13%
65.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=369)
-23%
Random Write 4KB
7.3
19.79
171%
128.36
1658%
17
133%
22.4
207%
23.1 (3.4 - 88.2, n=101)
216%
18.5 (0.14 - 250, n=666)
153%
Random Read 4KB
69.9
116.76
67%
135.14
93%
149.4
114%
140.7
101%
53 (11.4 - 149, n=101)
-24%
42 (1.59 - 174, n=666)
-40%
Sequential Write 256KB
203.8
194.65
-4%
208.1
2%
198.7
-3%
211.6
4%
172 (40 - 246, n=101)
-16%
87.4 (2.99 - 388, n=666)
-57%
Sequential Read 256KB
279.3
426.63
53%
756.07
171%
679.2
143%
737.5
164%
272 (115 - 704, n=101)
-3%
245 (12.1 - 912, n=666)
-12%
Asphalt 9: Legends
 InställningarVärde
 High Quality29 fps
 Standard / low29 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 InställningarVärde
 min60 fps
 high HD60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Shadow Fight 3
 InställningarVärde
 high60 fps
 minimal60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
PUBG Compare
010203040506070Tooltip
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; min; 1.27.1.2: Ø59.9 (57-60)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Arena of Valor; min: Ø60 (58-61)
Nokia 8 Sirocco Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Arena of Valor; min; 1.21.1.2: Ø59.7 (53-60)
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.27.1.2: Ø59.6 (47-60)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD: Ø60 (56-61)
Nokia 8 Sirocco Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.21.1.2: Ø59.8 (54-60)
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.3.1a: Ø28.9 (25-31)
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality: Ø27.7 (24-30)
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.3.1a: Ø29.3 (28-31)
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.16.1: Ø59.1 (53-60)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Shadow Fight 3; high: Ø59.1 (53-61)
Nokia 8 Sirocco Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.9.4: Ø59.5 (54-60)
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.16.1: Ø59.5 (57-60)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Shadow Fight 3; minimal: Ø59.3 (53-61)
Nokia 8 Sirocco Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.9.4: Ø59.5 (54-60)
Hög belastning
 46.1 °C41.4 °C42.6 °C 
 44.6 °C41.2 °C42.8 °C 
 43.2 °C40.8 °C41.2 °C 
Max: 46.1 °C
Medel: 42.7 °C
38.6 °C39.6 °C44.1 °C
38.6 °C39.7 °C43.8 °C
38.5 °C40.3 °C42.1 °C
Max: 44.1 °C
Medel: 40.6 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  44.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.1372539.138.23130.331.84034.2315031.431.76327.526.98021.822.610022.82612524.332.616020.539.320019.345.125018.750.831517.353.640016.758.350016.56263016.665.680015.666.7100015.172.4125014.171.4160014.163.7200014.462250013.959.8315013.866400013.662.8500014.670.863001470.9800014.270.31000013.762.61250013.758.41600013.948.9SPL69.763.426.979.8N22.916.80.946.1median 14.6median 62Delta2832.83924.328.518.619.924.330.133.835.221.223.424.82318.525.216.436.617.144.517.941.816.850.714.953.915.158.714.262.913.966.514.86814.269.414.771.214.473.414.372.31475.313.880.214.88114.475.61573.714.773.614.870.514.860.814.75526.787.50.865.9median 14.8median 680.610.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia 8.1Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia 8.1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.3 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.5 / 1.8 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.2 / 5.4 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
3800 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3400 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Nokia 8 Sirocco
3260 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-24%
-40%
-35%
-5%
-7%
-15%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
1.06
-33%
0.75
6%
0.72
10%
0.78
2%
0.787 (0.76 - 0.8, n=3)
2%
0.884 (0.2 - 3.4, n=700)
-11%
Idle Average *
1.5
1.94
-29%
2.25
-50%
2.21
-47%
1.53
-2%
1.657 (1.4 - 2.07, n=3)
-10%
1.738 (0.6 - 6.2, n=699)
-16%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
1.98
-10%
2.26
-26%
2.22
-23%
1.57
13%
2 (1.8 - 2.31, n=3)
-11%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=700)
-12%
Load Average *
3.2
3.56
-11%
4.89
-53%
4.6
-44%
3.49
-9%
3.62 (3.2 - 3.97, n=3)
-13%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=694)
-27%
Load Maximum *
5.4
7.49
-39%
9.6
-78%
9.34
-73%
6.96
-29%
5.44 (5.1 - 5.82, n=3)
-1%
5.84 (1.2 - 14.2, n=694)
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
28tim 02min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12tim 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14tim 17min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 06min
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
3800 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3400 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Nokia 8 Sirocco
3260 mAh
Battery Runtime
-0%
-6%
-19%
1%
Reader / Idle
1682
1780
6%
1678
0%
1402
-17%
1603
-5%
H.264
857
1005
17%
718
-16%
722
-16%
725
-15%
WiFi v1.3
738
689
-7%
716
-3%
679
-8%
693
-6%
Load
246
205
-17%
239
-3%
159
-35%
317
29%

För

+ lyxigt hölje
+ bra prestanda
+ skapliga kameror
+ låg energiförbrukning
+ gedigen batteritid
+ stryps ej vid belastning
+ ljusstark skärm

Emot

- har bara stöd för ett fåtal LTE-band
- lite intern lagring
- långsam intern lagring
- skärmen har hög svärta
Recension av Nokia 8.1. Recensionsex från notebooksbilliger.de.
Recension av Nokia 8.1. Recensionsex från notebooksbilliger.de.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Prisskiktet kring 4.500 kronor är en tuff marknad där ytterligare konkurrens uppstår i form av tidigare års flaggskeppsenheter som nu gått ner i pris. På papperet såg det ut som att Nokia 8.1 skulle behöva kämpa mot modeller som Sony Xperia XZ2, men HMD Global har gjort ett utmärkt jobb med att skapa en välavrundad smartphone som har mycket att erbjuda. 

Enheten har en tjusig och lyxig design som till och med kan stå sig mot dyrare telefoner. Vidare kan dess moderna SoC tävla med äldre flaggskeppsmodellers motsvarigheter och den har en enastående batteritid. Skärmen är dessutom precis lika ljusstark som de som återfinns i förra årets flaggskeppsmodeller och har inga problem med att befinna sig i direkt solljus. Dessutom imponerade kamerorna i våra tester, även om de saknar en del av de gimmicks som många flaggskeppstelefoner har.

Nokia 8.1 klarar grunderna bra och avvarar tramsigheter för att sudda ut gränsen mellan mittenskiktet och flaggskeppsmodellerna.

Nokia 8.1 har dock sina brister. HMD Global har utrustat den med långsam eMMC-lagring och den har färre LTE-band än vi hade önskat. Dessutom har skärmen en jämförelsevis hög svärta och ett svagt kontrastförhållande. Men om du är något av en Android-purist och vill ha en flaggskeppsnära upplevelse till ett överkomligt pris bör Nokia 8.1 finnas med på listan över modeller att överväga.

Nokia 8.1 - 02/06/2019 v6
Florian Schmitt

Design
87%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
97%
Anslutningar
42 / 60 → 70%
Vikt
90%
Batteri
95%
Skärm
86%
Spelprestanda
57 / 63 → 91%
Programprestanda
64 / 70 → 91%
Temperatur
86%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Camera
73%
Medel
77%
87%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Nokia 8.1 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Florian Schmitt, 2019-02-11 (Update: 2019-02-11)