Notebookcheck

Test: Eurocom Sky X7C (i7-8086K, GTX 1080, Clevo P775TM1-G) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 08/08/2018

Portabel debut för Core i7-8086K. Sky X7C lyckas få plats med en Core i7-8086K LGA1151 CPU i ett chassi på 15.6 tum, vilket gör den till en av de snabbaste bärbara speldatorerna som finns att tillgå. Men trots detta är de prestandamässiga fördelarna ganska marginella. Det största försäljningsargumentet för denna Eurocom-laptop är fortfarande dess goda servicemöjligheter.

Eurocom Sky X7C (Sky Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8086K
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Kärna: 1657 MHz, Minne: 10010 MHz, GDDR5X, 398.11
Minne
65536 MB 
, PC4-24000 DDR4 Corsair, 1499.6 MHz, 16-18-18-39, Dual-Kanal
Skärm
17.3 tum 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixlar 255 PPI, AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, ID: AUO109B, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Z370 (Kaby Lake)
Hårddisk
2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), 1024 GB 
Ljudkort
NVIDIA GP104 - High Definition Audio Controller
Anslutningar
5 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm extern 7.1CH ljudutgång; hörlurar ut, mikrofon in, S/PDIF och Line-in port, Kortläsare: SDXC-kortläsare, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare
Nätverk
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 39.9 x 418 x 295
Batteri
82 Wh, 5200 mAh Litiumjon, removeable
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: 2 MP
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo 2.2 W + 2.5 W subwoofer, Tangentbord: Sluttande, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Servicemanual, extra skruvar, skiva med drivrutiner, värmepasta, konsol för 2.5 tumsenhet, 12 Månader Garanti
Vikt
4.44 kg, Strömförsörjning: 1.54 kg
Pris
3000 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Vänster: Gigabit RJ-45, Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0 Typ C, 2x USB 3.0, SD-kortläsare
Vänster: Gigabit RJ-45, Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0 Typ C, 2x USB 3.0, SD-kortläsare
Baksidan: HDMI 2.0, 2x mini DisplayPort 1.3, Nätadapter
Baksidan: HDMI 2.0, 2x mini DisplayPort 1.3, Nätadapter
Höger: 3.5 mm 7.1 ljudutgång, hörlurar, mikrofon in, S/PDIF line-in, 2x USB 3.0, Kensington-lås
Höger: 3.5 mm 7.1 ljudutgång, hörlurar, mikrofon in, S/PDIF line-in, 2x USB 3.0, Kensington-lås
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus Chimera G703GI
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198 MB/s ∼100% +2%
Eurocom Sky X7C
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
194.3 MB/s ∼98%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s ∼40% -59%
Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼39% -60%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus Chimera G703GI
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
246 MB/s ∼100% +17%
Eurocom Sky X7C
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
209.48 MB/s ∼85%
Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼35% -58%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼35% -58%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
686 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
681 MBit/s ∼99% +2%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
670 MBit/s ∼98%
Aorus X7 DT v8
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
655 MBit/s ∼95% -2%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
690 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s ∼99% 0%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
679 MBit/s ∼98%
Aorus X7 DT v8
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
599 MBit/s ∼87% -12%
317.4
cd/m²
326.7
cd/m²
339.9
cd/m²
334.3
cd/m²
333
cd/m²
352
cd/m²
323.3
cd/m²
310.1
cd/m²
333.9
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 352 cd/m² Medel: 330.1 cd/m² Minimum: 16.7 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 333 cd/m²
Kontrast: 833:1 (Svärta: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.87 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 4.59
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
Eurocom Sky X7C
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 17.3, 1920x1080
Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935)
CV69H_173WF4 (LGD0459), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Asus Chimera G703GI
B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Aorus X7 DT v8
AU Optronics B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 17.3, 3840x2160
Response Times
79%
14%
72%
54%
-51%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38.4 (18, 20.4)
8 (4.4, 3.6)
79%
33 (13, 20)
14%
6.4 (3.4, 3)
83%
18 (8.8, 9.2)
53%
60.8 (28.8, 32)
-58%
Response Time Black / White *
26.8 (15.6, 11.2)
5.6 (3.8, 1.8)
79%
23 (5, 18)
14%
10.8 (6, 4.8)
60%
12 (6.8, 5.2)
55%
38.4 (22, 16.4)
-43%
PWM Frequency
26000 (19)
204.9 (20)
Screen
22%
-3%
19%
21%
1%
Brightness middle
333
240
-28%
360
8%
285
-14%
297
-11%
230
-31%
Brightness
330
248
-25%
336
2%
275
-17%
281
-15%
207
-37%
Brightness Distribution
88
83
-6%
90
2%
82
-7%
84
-5%
83
-6%
Black Level *
0.4
0.22
45%
0.44
-10%
0.22
45%
0.23
42%
0.2
50%
Contrast
833
1091
31%
818
-2%
1295
55%
1291
55%
1150
38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.87
2.14
64%
4.76
19%
3.18
46%
2.19
63%
5.62
4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.74
5.04
48%
10.8
-11%
5.99
39%
4.81
51%
10.24
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.59
1.54
66%
1.73
62%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.5
1.62
64%
3.69
18%
2.93
35%
1.31
71%
4.54
-1%
Gamma
2.34 94%
2.28 96%
2.24 98%
2.45 90%
2.42 91%
2.36 93%
CCT
6384 102%
6846 95%
6091 107%
7165 91%
6464 101%
6625 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88
77
-12%
55
-37%
60
-32%
59
-33%
88
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
100
0%
84
-16%
93
-7%
91
-9%
100
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
51% / 31%
6% / 0%
46% / 27%
38% / 26%
-25% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.6 ms rise
↘ 11.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8929 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320133013401350136013701380139014001410Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
207 Points ∼95%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
199 Points ∼91% -4%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
190 Points ∼87% -8%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
190 Points ∼87% -8%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
185 Points ∼85% -11%
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼80% -16%
AMD Ryzen 1800X
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
162 Points ∼74% -22%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
162 Points ∼74% -22%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Core i7-8550U
149 Points ∼68% -28%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
144 Points ∼66% -30%
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
142 Points ∼65% -31%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
138 Points ∼63% -33%
CPU Multi 64Bit
AMD Ryzen 1800X
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
1619 Points ∼37% +15%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1408 Points ∼32% 0%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
1408 Points ∼32%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
1405 (min: 1375.04, max: 1405.28) Points ∼32% 0%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1388 Points ∼32% -1%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
1334 Points ∼30% -5%
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
Intel Core i7-8750H
1091 Points ∼25% -23%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
897 Points ∼20% -36%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
798 Points ∼18% -43%
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
723 Points ∼17% -49%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
681 Points ∼16% -52%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Core i7-8550U
523 Points ∼12% -63%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
2.27 Points ∼93% +3%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
2.23 Points ∼91% +1%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
2.2 Points ∼90%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
2.19 Points ∼90% 0%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.1 Points ∼86% -5%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.78 Points ∼73% -19%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.64 Points ∼67% -25%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1.63 Points ∼67% -26%
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.62 Points ∼66% -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
15.76 Points ∼58% +2%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
15.64 Points ∼58% +1%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
15.41 Points ∼57%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.13 Points ∼56% -2%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
15.02 Points ∼55% -3%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
9.78 Points ∼36% -37%
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.03 Points ∼30% -48%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
7.48 Points ∼28% -51%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points ∼28% -52%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
7423 Points ∼69% +13%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
7413 Points ∼68% +13%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
7222 Points ∼67% +10%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
6978 Points ∼64% +7%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
6541 Points ∼60%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
6115 Points ∼56% -7%
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5454 Points ∼50% -17%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5432 Points ∼50% -17%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
4286 Points ∼40% -34%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
39624 Points ∼80% +20%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
39382 Points ∼79% +19%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
39380 Points ∼79% +19%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
33064 Points ∼66%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
29330 Points ∼59% -11%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
28189 Points ∼57% -15%
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21883 Points ∼44% -34%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
21752 Points ∼44% -34%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20324 Points ∼41% -39%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
357.5 s * ∼4% -199%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
229.514 s * ∼3% -92%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
205.94 s * ∼2% -72%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
176.329 s * ∼2% -47%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
119.722 s * ∼1%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
118.6 s * ∼1% +1%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
116.591 s * ∼1% +3%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
677.2 Seconds * ∼3% -34%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
565.023 Seconds * ∼3% -12%
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
561.7 Seconds * ∼2% -11%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
558.56 Seconds * ∼2% -11%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
503.822 Seconds * ∼2%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
481.1 Seconds * ∼2% +5%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
452.938 Seconds * ∼2% +10%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
442.8 Seconds * ∼2% +12%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
440.036 Seconds * ∼2% +13%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6831
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
33064
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6541
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
91.96 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
15.41 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.2 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
155.78 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1408 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
207 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 10 - Score
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
6607 Points ∼85% +4%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
6558 Points ∼84% +3%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
6495 Points ∼84% +2%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
6387 Points ∼82% 0%
Eurocom Sky X7C
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8086K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
6369 Points ∼82%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
3991 Points ∼51% -37%
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
6093 Points ∼100% +24%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
5859 Points ∼96% +19%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5720 Points ∼94% +17%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
5005 Points ∼82% +2%
Eurocom Sky X7C
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8086K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
4908 Points ∼81%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
4531 Points ∼74% -8%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4908 poäng
Hjälp
Eurocom Sky X7C
2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
Asus Chimera G703GI
2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
Aorus X7 DT v8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Razer Blade Pro 2017
2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
Aorus X9 DT
Transcend TS1TMTE850
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-20%
30%
-43%
-28%
-45%
Write 4K
152.2
111.8
-27%
130.2
-14%
88.55
-42%
124
-19%
104.4
-31%
Read 4K
60.4
42.09
-30%
57.33
-5%
30.76
-49%
40.68
-33%
35.69
-41%
Write Seq
3002
2288
-24%
4049
35%
1340
-55%
617.8
-79%
1015
-66%
Read Seq
3329
3321
0%
5325
60%
1362
-59%
2446
-27%
1283
-61%
Write 4K Q32T1
432.9
308.3
-29%
383.2
-11%
305.7
-29%
554.3
28%
308.9
-29%
Read 4K Q32T1
494
364.9
-26%
424.9
-14%
366.8
-26%
627.1
27%
371.9
-25%
Write Seq Q32T1
3391
2440
-28%
4316
27%
1562
-54%
620.4
-82%
1056
-69%
Read Seq Q32T1
3405
3485
2%
8905
162%
2414
-29%
2228
-35%
2204
-35%
2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3405 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3391 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 494 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 432.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3329 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3002 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 60.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 152.2 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky X7C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8086K
14228 Points ∼78%
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
14119 Points ∼78% -1%
Eurocom Q8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK
12215 Points ∼67% -14%
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
11498 Points ∼63% -19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
  (7533 - 16949, n=26)
11440 Points ∼63% -20%
Eurocom Q6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
10351 Points ∼57% -27%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
9771 Points ∼54% -31%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
8935 Points ∼49% -37%
Eurocom X8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4940MX
8693 Points ∼48% -39%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
8343 Points ∼46% -41%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1600
7838 Points ∼43% -45%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
46773 Points ∼92% +71%
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
32126 Points ∼63% +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
  (24868 - 31412, n=26)
28106 Points ∼55% +3%
Eurocom Sky X7C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8086K
27275 Points ∼53%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
23540 Points ∼46% -14%
Eurocom X8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4940MX
22072 Points ∼43% -19%
Eurocom Q8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK
21286 Points ∼42% -22%
Eurocom Q6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
18363 Points ∼36% -33%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1600
15182 Points ∼30% -44%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
14528 Points ∼28% -47%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
12472 Points ∼24% -54%
3DMark 11 Performance
22653 poäng
Hjälp
låg med. hög ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 379.5320.7303.4178.5fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 72fps
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra. Red represents frames per second with Control Center active while Orange is with Control Center disabled. The results mirror our experience on the Eurocom Q8.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
28.2 / 28.2 / 29 dB(A)
Hög belastning
41.8 / 42.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)
Eurocom Sky X7C
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8086K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935)
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
Aorus X7 DT v8
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
Noise
-22%
-9%
-21%
-22%
-15%
off / environment *
28.2
30
-6%
30
-6%
29
-3%
29
-3%
30
-6%
Idle Minimum *
28.2
32
-13%
31
-10%
30
-6%
35
-24%
30
-6%
Idle Average *
28.2
34
-21%
32
-13%
34
-21%
36
-28%
31
-10%
Idle Maximum *
29
37
-28%
33
-14%
42
-45%
41
-41%
33
-14%
Load Average *
41.8
43
-3%
38
9%
53
-27%
43
-3%
43
-3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42.2
57
-35%
51
-21%
53
-26%
55
-30%
Load Maximum *
42.2
62
-47%
50
-18%
53
-26%
54
-28%
58
-37%

* ... smaller is better

 35.2 °C38 °C30.2 °C 
 29.8 °C42 °C28.6 °C 
 24.6 °C24.8 °C22.2 °C 
Max: 42 °C
Medel: 30.6 °C
37.4 °C33.8 °C40.2 °C
25 °C25.6 °C29 °C
23 °C24.4 °C25.4 °C
Max: 40.2 °C
Medel: 29.3 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  43 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 41.7 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25 °C / 77 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+3.7 °C / 6.7 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.940.42536.235.23133.334.44031.933.25032.234.46333.433.98029.636.210029.147.81252952.71602856.520027.153.325026.851.831525.457.940025.255.750024.961.763024.259.980023.960.8100023.759.5125023.563.2160023.260200023.260.7250023.159.9315023.156400023.158.7500023.158.763002359.5800023.158.7100002356.61250022.856.11600022.953.6SPL35.671.8N2.531median 23.5median 58.7Delta1.92.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseEurocom Sky X7CApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Eurocom Sky X7C audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (63.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.33 / 1.84 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 33.3 / 40.1 / 42.1 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 95.6 / 220 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Eurocom Sky X7C
8086K, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), TN, 1920x1080, 17.3
Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935)
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 980M, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus Chimera G703GI
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Aorus X7 DT v8
8850H, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Razer Blade Pro 2017
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0), IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.3
Aorus X9 DT
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Transcend TS1TMTE850, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Power Consumption
-28%
35%
-27%
-6%
-9%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
33.3
31
7%
12
64%
29
13%
23
31%
31
7%
28
16%
Idle Average *
40.1
35
13%
18
55%
37
8%
33
18%
36
10%
37
8%
Idle Maximum *
42.1
45
-7%
26
38%
46
-9%
37
12%
44
-5%
40
5%
Load Average *
95.6
130
-36%
95
1%
156
-63%
115
-20%
107
-12%
109
-14%
Load Maximum *
220
374
-70%
188
15%
314
-43%
281
-28%
258
-17%
353
-60%
Witcher 3 ultra *
152.9
268
-75%
252
-65%
225
-47%
212
-39%
256
-67%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
2tim 23min
Eurocom Sky X7C
8086K, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 82 Wh
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 75 Wh
Asus Chimera G703GI
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 71 Wh
Aorus X7 DT v8
8850H, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 2017
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 99 Wh
Eurocom Sky X9C
8700K, GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 89 Wh
Aorus X9 DT
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Battery Runtime
-9%
59%
38%
-45%
33%
Reader / Idle
225
169
296
253
83
252
WiFi v1.3
143
130
-9%
228
59%
197
38%
78
-45%
190
33%
Load
63
51
80
81
47
77

För

+ många konfigurationsalternativ
+ 4 st interna enhetsplatser
+ bra ljudkvalitet
+ löstagbart batteri
+ enkel service
+ LGA 1151-sockel
+ Thunderbolt 3

Emot

- buggig mjukvara - kom ihåg att uppdatera systemet!
- acceptabla temperaturer vid spelande
- begränsad förmåga att upprätthålla Turbo Boost
- tung och dyr
- kort batteritid
Recenseras: Eurocom Sky X7C. Recensionsex från Eurocom
Recenseras: Eurocom Sky X7C. Recensionsex från Eurocom

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Innan vi delger våra tankar om Sky X7C är det av största vikt att den som köpt systemet uppdaterar sin mjukvara till den senaste versionen som finns här. Äldre versioner av Control Center har en bekräftad bugg som gör att GPU:n stryps i vissa spel såsom Witcher 3. Oturligt nog för oss så levererades vår testenhet med den buggiga versionen av mjukvaran och våra testresultat reflekterar således detta. Vi observerade samma resultat även i vår recension av Eurocom Q8.

Med den varningen överstökad så är den omodifierade Core i7-8086K i Eurocom som bäst 5 till 10 procent snabbare i rå prestanda än både  i7-8700K Sky X9C och i9-8950HK i Aorus X9 DT. Full belastning vid basklockfrekvensen på 4.0 GHz resulterar i en stabil kärntemperatur på 83 C. Prestandafördelarna i spel är minst sagt marginella.

Den bästa aspekten av Sky X7C är fortfarande dess modularitet. Entusiaster som önskar varje droppe av flerkärnig prestanda kan vilja överväga den billigare Ryzen 1800X framför i7-8086K. Innan sådana AMD-alternativ blir tillgängliga är Sky X7C dock den ultimata DTR-modellen på 17 tum.

Sky X7C inhyser en av de snabbaste processorerna från Intel som för tillfället finns tillgänglig i en mobil formfaktor. Men vi hoppas ändå på att Threadripper-alternativ kommer bli tillgängliga i framtiden helt enkelt för att AMD har varit extremt konkurrenskraftiga på desktop-marknaden det senaste.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Eurocom Sky X7C (i7-8086K, GTX 1080, Clevo P775TM1-G) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Allen Ngo, 2018-08- 8 (Update: 2018-08- 8)