Notebookcheck

Test: Aorus X9 DT (i9-8950HK, GTX 1080, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Florian Glaser (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 04/21/2018

Coffee Lake på tjack. Gigabytes Aorus X9 DT är en högpresterande laptop på 17 tum med toppskikts-hårdvara och en överklockningsbar processor som borde köra alla spel smidigt på sin FHD-skärm. Låt oss jämföra detta desktop-alternativ mot andra modeller med GTX 1080 - vilken kommer att segra?

Aorus X9 DT (X9 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i9-8950HK
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Kärna: 1632 MHz, Minne: 2500 MHz, GDDR5X, ForceWare 391.34
Minne
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dual-Kanal, 2 av 4 platser lediga, max. 64 GB
Skärm
17.3 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 127 PPI, AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, G-Sync, X-Rite Pantone, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel HM370
Hårddisk
Transcend TS1TMTE850,  GB 
, 1 TB NVMe-SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD, 7200 rpm. Tillgängliga platser: 2x M.2 Typ 2280 & 1x 2,5 tum
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, 4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: hörlurar, mikrofon, Kortläsare: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Nätverk
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 30 x 428 x 314
Batteri
94.24 Wh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2.2, Tangentbord: mekaniskt, Chiclet, RGB, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 330 W laddare, garantikort, instruktionsmanual, Adobe Reader XI, olika verktyg från tillverkaren, Killer Perferrmance Suite, MS Office 365 Testversion, XSplit Gamecaster Testversion, XSplit Broadcaster Testversion, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
3.66 kg, Strömförsörjning: 1.188 kg
Pris
3999 EUR

 

Command & Control
Command & Control
Deep Control
Deep Control
Fusion
Fusion
Driver Update
Driver Update

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus X9 DT
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
202 MB/s ∼100%
Aorus X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
199 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Asus G703
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
182 MB/s ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=192)
90.7 MB/s ∼45% -55%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83 MB/s ∼41% -59%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s ∼39% -61%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
73.04 MB/s ∼36% -64%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus X9 DT
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
241 MB/s ∼100%
Aorus X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
240 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Asus G703
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
240 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=190)
110 MB/s ∼46% -54%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89 MB/s ∼37% -63%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼37% -63%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.35 MB/s ∼36% -64%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
700 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s ∼97% +7%
Asus G703
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
681 MBit/s ∼97% +7%
Aorus X9 DT
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
639 MBit/s ∼91%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
593 MBit/s ∼85% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=156)
590 MBit/s ∼84% -8%
Aorus X9
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
396 MBit/s ∼57% -38%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
628 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
604 MBit/s ∼96% 0%
Aorus X9 DT
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
601 MBit/s ∼96%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
558 MBit/s ∼89% -7%
Aorus X9
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
536 MBit/s ∼85% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (213 - 697, n=156)
523 MBit/s ∼83% -13%
Asus G703
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
506 MBit/s ∼81% -16%
263
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
277
cd/m²
280
cd/m²
266
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
252
cd/m²
241
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 280 cd/m² Medel: 262.1 cd/m² Minimum: 12 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 280 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1273:1 (Svärta: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.78 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 0.74 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
92% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
Aorus X9 DT
AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080
Aorus X9
AUO B173QTN01.3 (AUO1396), TN, 2560x1440
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
AU Optronics B173HW01, IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 1920x1080
Asus G703
AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
14%
-151%
-139%
40%
6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
18.4 (9.2, 9.2)
21.6 (11.6, 10)
-17%
44 (22, 22)
-139%
45 (18, 27)
-145%
11.6 (6.4, 5.2)
37%
17.6 (8.4, 9.2)
4%
Response Time Black / White *
12 (6.8, 5.2)
6.6 (4.6, 2)
45%
31.6 (16, 15.6)
-163%
28 (6, 22)
-133%
6.8 (4.8, 2)
43%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
7%
PWM Frequency
25000 (15)
Screen
-119%
-40%
-70%
3%
-74%
Brightness middle
280
346
24%
343
23%
380
36%
274
-2%
274
-2%
Brightness
262
326
24%
332
27%
362
38%
262
0%
268
2%
Brightness Distribution
86
88
2%
83
-3%
91
6%
87
1%
80
-7%
Black Level *
0.22
0.54
-145%
0.35
-59%
0.37
-68%
0.26
-18%
0.29
-32%
Contrast
1273
641
-50%
980
-23%
1027
-19%
1054
-17%
945
-26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.78
5.98
-236%
3.35
-88%
4.12
-131%
1.36
24%
3.99
-124%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.91
9.77
-150%
5.62
-44%
8.19
-109%
4.1
-5%
7.33
-87%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
0.74
5.47
-639%
2.4
-224%
3.95
-434%
0.64
14%
4.14
-459%
Gamma
2.43 99%
2.21 109%
2.35 102%
2.47 97%
2.19 110%
2.58 93%
CCT
6494 100%
7721 84%
6495 100%
6539 99%
6551 99%
7352 88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
55
-8%
57
-5%
55
-8%
77
28%
60
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92
84
-9%
88
-4%
84
-9%
100
9%
92
0%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.5
1.79
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-53% / -97%
-96% / -59%
-105% / -81%
22% / 10%
-34% / -60%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8895 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
latencies
latencies
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
185 Points ∼100% 0%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
185 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
184 Points ∼99% -1%
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
174 Points ∼94% -6%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
162 Points ∼88% -12%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
160 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 207, n=394)
150 Points ∼81% -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1388 Points ∼100%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
932 Points ∼67% -33%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
874 Points ∼63% -37%
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
837 Points ∼60% -40%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
770 Points ∼55% -45%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
758 Points ∼55% -45%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1408, n=395)
726 Points ∼52% -48%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.1 Points ∼100%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
2.09 Points ∼100% 0%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
2.08 Points ∼99% -1%
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.97 Points ∼94% -6%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.84 Points ∼88% -12%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.81 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.34, n=393)
1.667 Points ∼79% -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.13 Points ∼100%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
10.33 Points ∼68% -32%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.55 Points ∼63% -37%
Aorus X9
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.19 Points ∼61% -39%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.47 Points ∼56% -44%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.34 Points ∼55% -45%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 15.8, n=494)
7.11 Points ∼47% -53%
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6978
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
39380
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.1 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
15.13 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
185 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1388 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 10 - Score
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
6387 Points ∼100%
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5611 Points ∼88% -12%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5290 Points ∼83% -17%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5211 Points ∼82% -18%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
5035 Points ∼79% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 6620, n=98)
4904 Points ∼77% -23%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
6123 Points ∼100% +1%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
6055 Points ∼99%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
6016 Points ∼98% -1%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5450 Points ∼89% -10%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5444 Points ∼89% -10%
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5240 Points ∼86% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=293)
4890 Points ∼80% -19%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5975 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
5944 Points ∼99% +1%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
5859 Points ∼98%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
5237 Points ∼88% -11%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5221 Points ∼87% -11%
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5020 Points ∼84% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=310)
4200 Points ∼70% -28%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5859 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6055 poäng
Hjälp
Aorus X9 DT
Transcend TS1TMTE850
Aorus X9
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0)
Asus G703
2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
AS SSD
75%
40%
36%
80%
96%
Score Total
2145
3753
75%
2862
33%
2581
20%
3392
58%
3962
85%
Score Write
916
1478
61%
1029
12%
930
2%
1289
41%
1519
66%
Score Read
828
1534
85%
1248
51%
1118
35%
1412
71%
1633
97%
4K Write
98.92
134.28
36%
116.23
17%
133.79
35%
128.75
30%
148.44
50%
4K Read
22.23
50.63
128%
44.81
102%
39.52
78%
50.12
125%
47.61
114%
Seq Write
1018.64
1677.74
65%
1145.25
12%
1338.19
31%
2352.3
131%
2556.32
151%
Seq Read
1517.93
2694.9
78%
2352.48
55%
2261.03
49%
3136.95
107%
3177.06
109%
Transcend TS1TMTE850
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2204 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1056 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 371.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 308.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1283 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1015 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 35.69 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 104.4 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus X9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop)
32640 Points ∼100% +47%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
22566 Points ∼69% +1%
Aorus X9 DT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
22240 Points ∼68%
Asus G703
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
22160 Points ∼68% 0%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
21366 Points ∼65% -4%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
20307 Points ∼62% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=424)
10168 Points ∼31% -54%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus X9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop)
41469 Points ∼100% +48%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
29109 Points ∼70% +4%
Asus G703
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
29109 Points ∼70% +4%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
28595 Points ∼69% +2%
Aorus X9 DT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
27966 Points ∼67%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
27109 Points ∼65% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=497)
11708 Points ∼28% -58%
3DMark 06 Standard
40395 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
22703 poäng
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
194505 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
42659 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
19250 poäng
Hjälp
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
99.9 fps ∼100% +29%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
77.9 fps ∼78% +1%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK
77.4 fps ∼77%
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
75.9 fps ∼76% -2%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
68.5 fps ∼69% -11%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
65 fps ∼65% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=198)
44.8 fps ∼45% -42%
låg med. hög ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 14677.4fps
Dirt 4 (2017) 157105fps
F1 2017 (2017) 167115fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 12699fps
The Evil Within 2 (2017) 77.775.3fps
ELEX (2017) 12199.2fps
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) 139123fps
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) 10786fps
Call of Duty WWII (2017) 175149fps
Fortnite (2018) 207160fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 77.6fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 10477.5fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 120113fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
36 / 37 / 43 dB(A)
Hårddisk
33 dB(A)
Hög belastning
50 / 61 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
1%
17%
11%
6%
8%
14%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
28.3
6%
30
-0%
30
-0%
30
-0%
29.5 (27.7 - 32, n=203)
2%
Idle Minimum *
36
35
3%
31.5
12%
33
8%
33
8%
35
3%
31.6 (28 - 41.7, n=624)
12%
Idle Average *
37
37
-0%
31.6
15%
35
5%
34
8%
36
3%
32.8 (28 - 46.6, n=624)
11%
Idle Maximum *
43
43
-0%
31.6
27%
37
14%
38
12%
38
12%
34.7 (28 - 50.4, n=624)
19%
Load Average *
50
49
2%
36.8
26%
40
20%
44
12%
46
8%
40.3 (30.3 - 58, n=625)
19%
Witcher 3 ultra *
57
56
2%
48.2
15%
56
2%
48
16%
Load Maximum *
61
60
2%
52.1
15%
50
18%
62
-2%
54
11%
47.6 (38.9 - 64, n=625)
22%

* ... smaller is better

 34 °C38 °C43 °C 
 33 °C37 °C42 °C 
 31 °C36 °C37 °C 
Max: 43 °C
Medel: 36.8 °C
55 °C52 °C42 °C
54 °C52 °C42 °C
42 °C40 °C34 °C
Max: 55 °C
Medel: 45.9 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  45 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-9%
16%
-4%
-15%
-11%
-5%
Maximum Upper Side *
43
47
-9%
35.6
17%
44.2
-3%
46
-7%
55
-28%
45.4 (28 - 68.8, n=589)
-6%
Maximum Bottom *
55
62
-13%
39
29%
43
22%
57
-4%
54
2%
49 (25.9 - 78, n=587)
11%
Idle Upper Side *
27
30
-11%
24.2
10%
32.4
-20%
34
-26%
29
-7%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=540)
-14%
Idle Bottom *
29
30
-3%
27.4
6%
32.8
-13%
35
-21%
32
-10%
31.6 (21.1 - 50.3, n=538)
-9%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.441.22535.834.63129.827.74036.933.45028.727.36325.832.68027.443.210025.947.112524.645.816021.753.220021.958.525022.663.231519.867.340019.170.750017.968.263017.764.980017.664100017.964.8125017.465.5160017.165.5200017.168.1250017.468.1315017.469400017.463.8500017.766.8630017.562800017.552.41000017.452.81250017.552.81600017.254.1SPL29.878N1.344.1median 17.6Aorus X9 DTmedian 64Delta1.66.935.737.233.530.933.831.532.331.631.632.832.530.529.33029.530.327.63427.441.526.545.425.748.525.851.224.951.324.551.724.760.825.164.42463.923.76024.259.923.660.423.362.323.459.923.464.623.66123.559.523.265.723.261.523.258.52453.23673.82.633.2median 24HP Omen X 17-ap0xxmedian 59.91.56hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Aorus X9 DT audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP Omen X 17-ap0xx audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 1.6 / 2 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 28 / 37 / 40 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 109 / 353 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-7%
26%
10%
-8%
4%
27%
Idle Minimum *
28
29
-4%
21.6
23%
27
4%
34
-21%
26
7%
20.5 (3.9 - 113, n=584)
27%
Idle Average *
37
35
5%
26.4
29%
32
14%
41
-11%
30
19%
26.1 (6.8 - 119, n=584)
29%
Idle Maximum *
40
42
-5%
26.6
33%
41
-3%
50
-25%
37
7%
31.2 (8.3 - 122, n=584)
22%
Load Average *
109
140
-28%
95.6
12%
102
6%
106
3%
123
-13%
105 (14.1 - 319, n=575)
4%
Load Maximum *
353
334
5%
199.6
43%
248
30%
320
9%
341
3%
166 (21.9 - 590, n=574)
53%
Witcher 3 ultra *
256
295
-15%
221.7
13%
257
-0%
257
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
4tim 12min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3tim 10min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 17min
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 94.24 Wh
Aorus X9
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 7820HK, 94.24 Wh
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 99 Wh
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 88.8 Wh
MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 75 Wh
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 71 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-23%
55%
24%
-23%
-24%
21%
Reader / Idle
252
174
-31%
348
38%
313
24%
182
-28%
200
-21%
326 (39 - 1174, n=575)
29%
WiFi v1.3
190
134
-29%
333
75%
251
32%
144
-24%
151
-21%
248 (78 - 622, n=248)
31%
Load
77
71
-8%
117
52%
90
17%
65
-16%
54
-30%
78.6 (18 - 202, n=543)
2%
H.264
138
204
148
143
244 (88 - 506, n=119)

För

+ 144 Hz-skärm med hög kontrast och utmärkta betraktningsvinklar
+ mekaniskt RGB-bakgrundsbelyst tangentbord
+ möjlighet till överklockning av CPU/GPU
+ X-Rite Pantone-certifierad
+ hög lagringskapacitet
+ många användbara verktyg
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ G-Sync

Emot

- insidan och ventilationshålen blev väldigt snabbt dammiga
- extremt hög ljudnivå i Spel-läge
- hög energiförbrukning i standby/avstängt läge
- designen verkar ganska planlös
- dålig batteritid
Aorus X9 DT. Review unit courtesy of Gigabyte Germany.
Aorus X9 DT. Review unit courtesy of Gigabyte Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

2018 års version av Gigabyte Aorus X9 DT är en blandad kompott. Ja, jämfört med andra toppskikts-modeller för spel så är höljet behagligt tunt (3 cm) och ja, med en vikt på bara 3.7 kg är den dessutom jämförelsevis lätt. Men platsbesparingen kommer på bekostnad av kylprestandan.

När "Gaming"-läget är aktiverat och med en lätt överklockning inställd så blir denna laptop på 17 tum så enormt högljudd av det helt och hållet förstörde upplevelsen. Med dom inställningarna så har Aorus X9 DT satt ett nytt rekord och sänkt den nedre gränsen avsevärt. Som tur är var "Normal"- och "Quiet"-lägena mycket bättre.

Bortsett från dom extremt höga ljudnivåerna så har Gigabyte gjort ett ganska bra jobb. Det mekaniska tangentbordet med tydlig återkoppling och ljusstark RGB-bakgrundsbelysning var ett nöje att använda. Anslutbarheten var hyfsad och inkluderar Thunderbolt 3. Och 144 Hz-skärmen i kombination med Core i9-8950HKGeForce GTX 1080, and Nvidias G-Sync teknologi var definitivt en höjdpunkt.

Aorus X9 DT - 04/16/2018 v6
Florian Glaser

Design
76 / 98 → 78%
Tangentbord
87%
Mus
78%
Anslutningar
72 / 81 → 89%
Vikt
52 / 10-66 → 75%
Batteri
70%
Skärm
91%
Spelprestanda
100%
Programprestanda
100%
Temperatur
81 / 95 → 85%
Ljudnivå
44 / 90 → 49%
Audio
80%
Subjektivt intryck
-1%
Medel
71%
86%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Aorus X9 DT
Aorus X9 DT
Aorus X9 DT
Aorus X9 DT
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Aorus X9 DT (i9-8950HK, GTX 1080, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Florian Glaser, 2018-04-21 (Update: 2018-04-21)