Notebookcheck

Test: Asus ZenBook 15 UX534F - Ser ut som en Ultrabook, spelar som en Gamer (Sammanfattning)

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 10/09/2019

Ultrabook/gaming-hybrid. Zenbook 15 är en av väldigt få bärbara datorer som är utrustad med en CPU från Intels U-serie och ett GTX 1650 Max-Q, vilket ger en imponerande nivå av spelprestanda i förhållande till det kompakta höljet. Den lyckas uppnå en utmärkt balans mellan mobiliteten och batteritiden hos en traditionell Ultrabook och tillräckligt med GPU-styrka för att kunna spela de senaste spelen i 1080p. ScreenPad 2.0 är skarpare och känns smidigare än innan, men prispåslaget som tillkommer är svårsålt.

Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 (ZenBook 15 UX534 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8565U
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 4096 MB, Kärna: 1020 MHz, Minne: 1751 MHz, GDDR5, 436.30, Optimus
Minne
16384 MB 
, 1200 MHz, 16-20-20-45
Skärm
15.6 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, BOE NV156FHM-N63, IPS, BOE07D8, glansig: ja
Moderkort
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Hårddisk
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB 
,
Ljudkort
Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm, Kombinerad, Kortläsare: SD-kortläsare
Nätverk
Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 18.9 x 354 x 220
Batteri
71 Wh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, My Asus, ICEPower, 12 Månader Garanti
Vikt
1.65 kg, Strömförsörjning: 418 g
Pris
1400 USD
Länkar
Asus hemsida
Asus kategori
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones

359 mm 246 mm 24 mm 2.5 kg361 mm 250 mm 19.3 mm 2.2 kg360 mm 249 mm 17.2 mm 1.9 kg355 mm 235 mm 19.9 mm 2.1 kg357 mm 235 mm 17 mm 2 kg354 mm 220 mm 18.9 mm 1.7 kg354 mm 220 mm 18 mm 1.6 kg
Framsidan: Inga portar
Framsidan: Inga portar
Höger: SD-kortläsare, USB Typ C 3.1 Gen. 2, USB Typ A 3.1 Gen. 2, HDMI, AC-adapter
Höger: SD-kortläsare, USB Typ C 3.1 Gen. 2, USB Typ A 3.1 Gen. 2, HDMI, AC-adapter
Baksidan: Inga portar
Baksidan: Inga portar
Vänster: USB 3.1 Typ A Gen. 1
Vänster: USB 3.1 Typ A Gen. 1
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
172.4 MB/s ∼100% +149%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
149.3 MB/s ∼87% +116%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
69.2 MB/s ∼40%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
193.8 MB/s ∼100% +136%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
192.1 MB/s ∼99% +134%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82.2 MB/s ∼42%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
696 MBit/s ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
674 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
649 MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
616 MBit/s ∼89% -11%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
596 (min: 521, max: 646) MBit/s ∼86% -14%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
659 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
650 MBit/s ∼99% +5%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
644 MBit/s ∼98% +4%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
633 (min: 482, max: 722) MBit/s ∼96% +2%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
621 MBit/s ∼94%
291.7
cd/m²		306.4
cd/m²		303.4
cd/m²
276.1
cd/m²		312.6
cd/m²		286.7
cd/m²
266.3
cd/m²		298.4
cd/m²		271.2
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
BOE NV156FHM-N63
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 312.6 cd/m² Medel: 290.3 cd/m² Minimum: 16.68 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 312.6 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1008:1 (Svärta: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.78 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 3.78
ΔE Greyscale 5.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
87.4% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 57.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
BOE NV156FHM-N63, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080		Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Samsung 156WR04, SDCA029, OLED, 15.6, 3840x2160		HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
AU Optronics AUO30EB, IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160		Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB
BOE HF NV156QUM-N51, IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080		Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
APPA040, IPS, 15.4, 2880x1800
Response Times
94%
-16%
21%
69%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41.2 (22, 19.2)
2.3 (1.1, 1.2)
94%
57 (26, 31)
-38%
34 (16, 18)
17%
13.6 (7.2, 6.4)
67%
43.2 (20.4, 22.8)
-5%
Response Time Black / White *
33.2 (19.6, 13.6)
2.4 (1.1, 1.3)
93%
31 (16, 15)
7%
25 (14, 11)
25%
10 (6, 4)
70%
31.2 (16.4, 14.8)
6%
PWM Frequency
59.52 (100)
961 (90)
200 (99)
117000 (75, 150)
Screen
19%
11%
5%
12%
47%
Brightness middle
312.6
421.2
35%
330
6%
309
-1%
312.7
0%
520
66%
Brightness
290
417
44%
310
7%
299
3%
305
5%
492
70%
Brightness Distribution
85
94
11%
87
2%
84
-1%
90
6%
88
4%
Black Level *
0.31
0.37
-19%
0.29
6%
0.27
13%
0.39
-26%
Contrast
1008
892
-12%
1066
6%
1158
15%
1333
32%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.78
6.06
-5%
4.03
30%
3.9
33%
4.57
21%
1.2
79%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.86
11.89
-34%
6.74
24%
7.5
15%
6.81
23%
2.3
74%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.78
1.96
48%
2.91
23%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.4
2.8
48%
4.49
17%
4.58
15%
4.3
20%
1.3
76%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.15 102%
2.57 86%
2.43 91%
2.29 96%
2.18 101%
CCT
7864 83%
6235 104%
6744 96%
7344 89%
7098 92%
6738 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57.1
81
42%
61
7%
39
-32%
59.4
4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
87.4
99.6
14%
94
8%
90
3%
91.3
4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
57% / 34%
-3% / 7%
13% / 7%
41% / 21%
24% / 38%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms rise
↘ 13.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 19.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 13573 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820Tooltip
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø669 (651.9-718.51)
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø570 (535-723)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø658 (642.69-661.47)
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F GeForce MX250, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø502 (489.9-680.49)
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø704 (683.27-815.1)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
Intel Core i7-8565U
181 Points ∼83%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
Intel Core i7-9750H
179 Points ∼82% -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
Intel Core i7-8550U
172 Points ∼79% -5%
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
Intel Core i5-9300H
171 Points ∼78% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (73.1 - 193, n=48)
170 Points ∼78% -6%
Asus VivoBook 14 X412FJ-EB023T
Intel Core i5-8265U
155 Points ∼71% -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
150 Points ∼69% -17%
Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T
Intel Core i5-8250U
146 Points ∼67% -19%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
144 Points ∼66% -20%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UM462DA-AI023T
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
142.24 Points ∼65% -21%
Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T
Intel Core i7-7500U
141 Points ∼65% -22%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
Intel Core i7-9750H
1166 Points ∼27% +71%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
805 Points ∼18% +18%
Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T
Intel Core i5-8250U
730 Points ∼17% +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
Intel Core i7-8550U
729 Points ∼17% +7%
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE
Intel Core i5-9300H
717 Points ∼16% +5%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
Intel Core i7-8565U
683 Points ∼16%
Asus VivoBook 14 X412FJ-EB023T
Intel Core i5-8265U
666 Points ∼15% -2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
661 Points ∼15% -3%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UM462DA-AI023T
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
651.58 Points ∼15% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (361 - 815, n=49)
586 Points ∼13% -14%
Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T
Intel Core i7-7500U
307 Points ∼7% -55%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
181 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
683 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
107.11 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Hjälp
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6880 Points ∼53% +47%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
6110 Points ∼47% +31%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4884 Points ∼38% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (4680 - 4947, n=3)
4848 Points ∼37% +4%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4680 Points ∼36%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
4473 Points ∼35% -4%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
4042 Points ∼31% -14%
Productivity
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
7569 Points ∼73% +5%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
7494 Points ∼72% +4%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7485 Points ∼72% +4%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7201 Points ∼69%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (7175 - 7201, n=3)
7184 Points ∼69% 0%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
6722 Points ∼65% -7%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
6678 Points ∼64% -7%
Essentials
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
9701 Points ∼85% +7%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9524 Points ∼83% +5%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9067 Points ∼79%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
8894 Points ∼78% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (8709 - 9067, n=3)
8852 Points ∼77% -2%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
8258 Points ∼72% -9%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
8237 Points ∼72% -9%
Score
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5654 Points ∼70% +17%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
5469 Points ∼67% +13%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (4828 - 4851, n=3)
4842 Points ∼60% 0%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4828 Points ∼60%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
4805 Points ∼59% 0%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4636 Points ∼57% -4%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
4347 Points ∼54% -10%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5279 Points ∼80% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (5132 - 5145, n=2)
5139 Points ∼78% 0%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5132 Points ∼78%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
4762 Points ∼72% -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
4575 Points ∼69% -11%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
4382 Points ∼66% -15%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4316 Points ∼65% -16%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4157 Points ∼68% +10%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
3799 Points ∼62% +1%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
3764 Points ∼62%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (3758 - 3764, n=2)
3761 Points ∼62% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Radeon Pro 560X, 8850H, Apple SSD AP0512
3735 Points ∼61% -1%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
3505 Points ∼58% -7%
HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
3494 Points ∼57% -7%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3764 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5132 poäng
Hjälp
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02		HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04		Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB
SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)		Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
AS SSD
18%
-43%
-25%
7%
-14%
Copy Game MB/s
1287.32
1823.85
42%
700.4
-46%
574.39
-55%
1676.98
30%
1149.77
-11%
Copy Program MB/s
468.05
983.98
110%
328.55
-30%
390
-17%
874.26
87%
513.29
10%
Copy ISO MB/s
1375.25
3182.39
131%
1651.54
20%
1640.9
19%
2111.62
54%
1539.06
12%
Score Total
3483
3638
4%
2684
-23%
1951
-44%
3970
14%
3177
-9%
Score Write
1664
1693
2%
1127
-32%
677
-59%
2034
22%
1450
-13%
Score Read
1210
1294
7%
1071
-11%
884
-27%
1278
6%
1152
-5%
Access Time Write *
0.075
0.039
48%
0.057
24%
0.051
32%
0.118
-57%
0.104
-39%
Access Time Read *
0.034
0.05
-47%
0.147
-332%
0.044
-29%
0.041
-21%
0.063
-85%
4K-64 Write
1374.95
1456.13
6%
956.6
-30%
486.04
-65%
1809.77
32%
1212.2
-12%
4K-64 Read
969.22
1077.98
11%
845.02
-13%
623.05
-36%
1092.42
13%
917.46
-5%
4K Write
146.01
98.3
-33%
92.75
-36%
123.04
-16%
93.04
-36%
105.96
-27%
4K Read
52.32
43.25
-17%
24.62
-53%
44.74
-14%
44.99
-14%
51.32
-2%
Seq Write
1432.22
1386.27
-3%
773.05
-46%
679.56
-53%
1316.23
-8%
1315.15
-8%
Seq Read
1886.9
1723.09
-9%
2017.79
7%
2158.18
14%
1408.99
-25%
1828.99
-3%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3464 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2393 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 391.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 458.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2272 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1975 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.28 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 141.6 MB/s
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
6419 Points ∼44% +126%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
5913 Points ∼40% +108%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H
5335 Points ∼36% +88%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
4708 Points ∼32% +66%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
3626 Points ∼25% +28%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H
3510 Points ∼24% +24%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), 2700X
3492 Points ∼24% +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (2836 - 3238, n=10)
3000 Points ∼20% +6%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U
2836 Points ∼19%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
2536 Points ∼17% -11%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8550U
1416 Points ∼10% -50%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
1138 Points ∼8% -60%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, 8565U
1000 Points ∼7% -65%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
862 Points ∼6% -70%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
16483 Points ∼41% +117%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
15696 Points ∼39% +107%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H
14753 Points ∼36% +94%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
14724 Points ∼36% +94%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
11332 Points ∼28% +49%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H
9423 Points ∼23% +24%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), 2700X
9195 Points ∼23% +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (6985 - 8618, n=9)
7903 Points ∼19% +4%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
7791 Points ∼19% +3%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U
7593 Points ∼19%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8550U
5965 Points ∼15% -21%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4133 Points ∼10% -46%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, 8565U
3321 Points ∼8% -56%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
2874 Points ∼7% -62%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
106563 Points ∼55% +128%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
101481 Points ∼53% +117%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
101453 Points ∼53% +117%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H
98452 Points ∼51% +111%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
80615 Points ∼42% +73%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H
61286 Points ∼32% +31%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), 2700X
50549 Points ∼26% +8%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
49314 Points ∼26% +6%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U
46686 Points ∼24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (22113 - 53981, n=8)
42955 Points ∼22% -8%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8550U
26144 Points ∼14% -44%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
25986 Points ∼13% -44%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, 8565U
20961 Points ∼11% -55%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
18633 Points ∼10% -60%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
12458 Points ∼55% +45%
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
12260 Points ∼54% +43%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
12069 Points ∼53% +41%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), 2700X
11707 Points ∼52% +37%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H
11416 Points ∼50% +33%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H
9140 Points ∼40% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (6547 - 10846, n=10)
8878 Points ∼39% +4%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U
8563 Points ∼38%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
8540 Points ∼38% 0%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
6839 Points ∼30% -20%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4466 Points ∼20% -48%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8550U
4446 Points ∼20% -48%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, 8565U
4097 Points ∼18% -52%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
3707 Points ∼16% -57%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Strix Hero III G731GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
20765 Points ∼41% +93%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H
19329 Points ∼38% +80%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
19187 Points ∼38% +78%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
18434 Points ∼36% +71%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), 2700X
13759 Points ∼27% +28%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H
13138 Points ∼26% +22%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
12620 Points ∼25% +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
  (10422 - 12259, n=11)
11296 Points ∼22% +5%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U
10761 Points ∼21%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
9466 Points ∼19% -12%
Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8550U
6935 Points ∼14% -36%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4826 Points ∼9% -55%
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, 8565U
4274 Points ∼8% -60%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
3560 Points ∼7% -67%
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark 11 Performance
10217 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
21547 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6698 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
2949 poäng
Hjälp
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
83 fps ∼100% +144%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
71 fps ∼86% +109%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
67 fps ∼81% +97%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
61 fps ∼73% +79%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
49 fps ∼59% +44%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop)
44 fps ∼53% +29%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
43 fps ∼52% +26%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
34 fps ∼41% 0%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
34 fps ∼41%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
31 fps ∼37% -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H, AMD Radeon Pro 560X
23 (min: 17, max: 39) fps ∼28% -32%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
23 fps ∼28% -32%
1280x720 Lowest Preset
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop)
132 fps ∼100% +43%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
130 fps ∼98% +41%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
128 fps ∼97% +39%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
115 fps ∼87% +25%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
114 fps ∼86% +24%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
111 fps ∼84% +21%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
111 fps ∼84% +21%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
92 fps ∼70%
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Intel Core i7-8850H, AMD Radeon Pro 560X
81 (min: 60, max: 147) fps ∼61% -12%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
63 fps ∼48% -32%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
62 fps ∼47% -33%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
54 fps ∼41% -41%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
24 fps ∼18% -74%
0102030405060Tooltip
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø48.5 (45-52)
låg med. hög ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 259.1 196.1 172.2 72 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 156.1 93.6 54.3 30.7 fps
Rocket League (2017) 216.1 138.1 97.8 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 92 48 39 34 fps
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02		Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ		HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04		Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
Noise
-10%
-6%
-13%
-9%
-5%
off / environment *
28.4
28.2
1%
28.4
-0%
28.5
-0%
30.4
-7%
30.5
-7%
Idle Minimum *
28.4
28.2
1%
29
-2%
30.3
-7%
30.4
-7%
30.5
-7%
Idle Average *
28.4
28.2
1%
29
-2%
30.5
-7%
30.4
-7%
30.5
-7%
Idle Maximum *
28.4
30.4
-7%
29
-2%
30.5
-7%
31.6
-11%
30.5
-7%
Load Average *
33.9
43.8
-29%
35.4
-4%
41
-21%
43.2
-27%
37.5
-11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
39.8
47.2
-19%
42
-6%
48
-21%
Load Maximum *
40.2
47.2
-17%
50
-24%
51.9
-29%
38.3
5%
37.5
7%

* ... smaller is better

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
28.4 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB(A)
Hög belastning
33.9 / 40.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 28.4 dB(A)
Hög belastning
 45.4 °C44.8 °C37 °C 
 39 °C44.6 °C35 °C 
 35 °C31.8 °C32.6 °C 
Max: 45.4 °C
Medel: 38.4 °C
43 °C51.6 °C48 °C
38 °C42.4 °C44.6 °C
34.2 °C36.6 °C37.4 °C
Max: 51.6 °C
Medel: 41.8 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  46 °C | Rumstemperatur 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.6 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-6 °C / -10.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.246.72540.344.83141434038.442.35038.339.46340.239.48036.93810034.936.112534.640.316034.650.920033.355.225031.761.531532.165.44003168.950030.969.863029.969.580029.171100029.269125028.565.1160028.563.3200028.161250028.158.7315027.758.5400027.763.4500027.666.3630027.564.3800027.560.11000027.461.71250027.460.91600027.363.8SPL40.777.5N4.143.3median 28.5median 63.3Delta2.34.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.49 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.1 / 9.2 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 5 / 13.2 / 24 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 70 / 114 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6		Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6		Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
9980HK, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6		Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, Apple SSD AP0512, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4		Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB
8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6		HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Power Consumption
-16%
-108%
-117%
19%
27%
27%
Idle Minimum *
5
6.2
-24%
19.3
-286%
18.7
-274%
3.4
32%
4.8
4%
2.1
58%
Idle Average *
13.2
9.6
27%
24.2
-83%
30.7
-133%
11
17%
10.1
23%
6.7
49%
Idle Maximum *
24
21.2
12%
24.5
-2%
33.9
-41%
14.9
38%
10.7
55%
11.4
52%
Load Average *
70
104.3
-49%
122.3
-75%
93.4
-33%
78.9
-13%
44
37%
77.7
-11%
Load Maximum *
114
135.3
-19%
208.4
-83%
195.3
-71%
91.2
20%
94.7
17%
131.5
-15%
Witcher 3 ultra *
63.3
91.7
-45%
137
-116%
158.9
-151%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
21tim 29min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8tim 23min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 54min
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77
8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 71 Wh		Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 97 Wh		HP Spectre x360 15-df0126ng
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 84 Wh		Lenovo Yoga 730-15IKB
8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 51.5 Wh		Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
9980HK, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 71 Wh		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 65 Wh
Battery Runtime
-7%
-10%
-48%
-47%
-34%
Reader / Idle
1289
910
-29%
1127
-13%
697
-46%
786
-39%
WiFi v1.3
503
467
-7%
528
5%
370
-26%
248
-51%
330
-34%
Load
174
199
14%
135
-22%
50
-71%
84
-52%

För

+ imponerande spelprestanda för sin storlek och vikt
+ ScreenPad 2.0 ger extra skärmutrymme
+ kraftig prestanda vid batteridrift
+ litet fotavtryck; portabel
+ fast lock och bas
+ lång batteritid

Emot

- varmare kärntemperaturer än på anda laptops med Core U
- SD-kort sticker ut från basen med över halva sin längd
- trånga piltangenter och trångt numeriskt tangentbord
- saknar Thunderbolt 3 och fingeravtrycksläsare
- endast en M.2 2280 för lagring
- går inte att ladda genom USB Typ C
- RAM och WLAN går inte att uppgradera
- ScreenPad är fortfarande ganska grynig
- problem med DPC-latens
Recension av Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77. Recensionsex från Xotic PC
Recension av Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77. Recensionsex från Xotic PC

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

ZenBook 15 UX533 och UX534 har något som de flesta andra Ultrabook-modeller på 15.6 tum inte har: En ULV-CPU från Intel tillsammans med en GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q GPU. Konkurrenter som Dell XPS 15 eller HP Spectre x360 15 har snabbare processorer från Core H-serien med GTX 1650 som tillval och de är således större och tyngre än ZenBook. Dessa processorer passar bäst för innehållsskapare och digitala artister och är därför oftast mer våld än nöden kräver för surfande, filmströmning och ordbehandling. ZenBook 15 UX533/UX534 är en mittemellanlösning som passar för multimediabruk till vardags samtidigt som den har nästan samma spelförmåga som tidigare nämnda system från Dell och HP, allt i ett mer energieffektivt paket. Då det finns en risk att traditionella bärbara speldatorer hotas av Google Stadia och liknande går ZenBook 15 UX534 istället en bekväm väg mellan Ultrabook och instegsspelmaskin.

Asus joker är ScreenPad, som kostar 2.000 kronor extra. Om din ZenBook i huvudsak kommer sitta fast hemma eller på ett skrivbord är det istället bättre du investerar de 2.000 kronorna i en extern monitor. Men om du ofta sitter på caféer, flygplatser eller andra ställen utanför kontoret och arbetar med många flikar och fönster samtidigt kan det vara riktigt värt att ha en extra skärm oavsett situation. Kom bara ihåg att ta med dig en extern mus så du kan använda den extra skärmen fullt ut.

När det kommer till spel är ZenBook 15 UX534 effektivare än de flesta andra Ultrabook-modellerna i sin storleksklass. Du blir utan Thunderbolt 3 och processor från Core H-serien, men om du i huvudsak ska använda din ZenBook till multimediauppspelning, spel eller ordbehandling på resande fot är det möjligt att du inte ens märker detta.