Debut för ScreenPad 2.0: Recension av Asus VivoBook S15 S532FL (Sammanfattning)

Name: Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
Brand: Asus

Sagan om de två skärmarna. Asus andra försök med en styrplatteskärms-hybrid är mycket bättre än första generationens ScreenPad som satt på förra årets ZenBook Pro 15 UX580 när det kommer till användbarhet och skärmkvalitet. Några hinder återstår, som påverkan på batteritiden, det gryniga matta överdraget och de dåliga betraktningsvinklarna.

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 07/25/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Laptop / Notebook Touchscreen Ultrabook Whiskey Lake

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus VivoBook S15 S532F (VivoBook S15 S532 Serie)

Processor

Intel Core i7-8565U 4 x 1.8 - 4.6 GHz, Whiskey Lake-U

Grafikkort

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 - 2048 MB VRAM, Kärna: 1519 MHz, Minne: 1502 MHz, GDDR5, 419.72, Optimus

Minne

8 GB

, 4 GB fastlött + 4 GB Samsung DDR4-2666 (1x SODIMM), 1200 MHz, 17-17-17-39

Skärm

15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS, LGD0563, glansig: nej

Moderkort

Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium

Hårddisk

WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, 256 GB

Ljudkort

Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS

Anslutningar

2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Ljudanslutningar: Kombinerad 3.5 mm, Kortläsare: MicroSD-kortläsare

Nätverk

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 18 x 357.2 x 230.3

Batteri

42 Wh Litiumpolymer, 3 celler

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webbkamera: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, ScreenPad 2.0, Asus E-Service, McAfee LiveSafe, 12 Månader Garanti

Vikt

1.8 kg, Strömförsörjning: 325 g

Pris

800 USD

Länkar

Asus hemsida
Asus kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE Asus VivoBook S15 S532F Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD DIN A4 ❌

Höger: MicroSD-kortläsare, Kombinerad ljudanslutning 3.5 mm, USB Typ C Gen. 1, USB 3.0, HDMI, AC-adapter

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	176.6 MB/s +430%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	77.8 MB/s +134%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-14IWL-81N70056GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	71.6 MB/s +115%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	65.6 MB/s +97%
Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	34 MB/s +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II)	33.3 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	207.8 MB/s +484%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	88.2 MB/s +148%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-14IWL-81N70056GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	83.7 MB/s +135%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	78 MB/s +119%
Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	38.3 MB/s +8%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II)	35.6 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Wireless-AC 9560	648 (626^min - 667^max) MBit/s +35%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD Intel Wireless-AC 9560	644 (499^min - 661^max) MBit/s +34%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U Intel Wireless-AC 9560	643 MBit/s +34%
Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	564 MBit/s +18%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	479 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD Intel Wireless-AC 9560	651 (547^min - 681^max) MBit/s +7%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U Intel Wireless-AC 9560	638 MBit/s +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	610 MBit/s
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Wireless-AC 9560	522 (371^min - 601^max) MBit/s -14%
Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	487 MBit/s -20%


258.4 cd/m²	260.6 cd/m²	243.3 cd/m²
260.1 cd/m²	262.3 cd/m²	250.2 cd/m²
235.7 cd/m²	245.6 cd/m²	233.4 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 262.3 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 250 cd/m² Minimum: 13.02 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 262.3 cd/m²
Kontrast: 610:1 (Svärta: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.81 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 5.36
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
55.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
35.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
55.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.12% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.15

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus VivoBook S15 S532F LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD LQ156D1, IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160	HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Chi Mei CM15E9, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD BOE07D8, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L BOE NV156FHM-N48, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS LED, 15.60, 1920x1080
Display		99%	11%	69%	7%	4%
Display P3 Coverage	37.12	79.6 114%	41.36 11%	67.2 81%	40.02 8%	38.51 4%
sRGB Coverage	55.9	98.4 76%	62.2 11%	88.4 58%	58.5 5%	57.9 4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	38.35	79.7 108%	42.74 11%	64.6 68%	41.34 8%	39.79 4%
Response Times		-72%	-35%	-68%	-60%	-34%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	24.8 ?(12.8, 12)	52.4 ?(27.6, 24.8) -111%	40 ?(22, 18) -61%	45 ?(21, 24) -81%	45 ?(23, 22) -81%	38.8 ?(20.8, 18) -56%
Response Time Black / White *	24 ?(14, 10)	31.6 ?(18, 13.6) -32%	26 ?(14, 12) -8%	37 ?(23, 14) -54%	33 ?(18, 15) -38%	26.8 ?(16, 10.8) -12%
PWM Frequency		1000 ?(25)	25000 ?(30)		250 ?(90)
Screen		28%	34%	31%	19%	18%
Brightness middle	262.3	451.9 72%	221 -16%	311 19%	278 6%	262 0%
Brightness	250	414 66%	207 -17%	303 21%	271 8%	256 2%
Brightness Distribution	89	81 -9%	87 -2%	81 -9%	89 0%	90 1%
Black Level *	0.43	0.36 16%	0.15 65%	0.24 44%	0.26 40%	0.21 51%
Contrast	610	1255 106%	1473 141%	1296 112%	1069 75%	1248 105%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.81	5.62 3%	4.35 25%	5.1 12%	4.73 19%	5.8 -0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	14.7	19.1 -30%	8.98 39%	8.91 39%	8.38 43%	14.3 3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	5.36	2.69 50%		2.48 54%	5.17 4%	4.6 14%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.8	6.9 -146%	3.09 -10%	4.93 -76%	2.59 7%	2.5 11%
Gamma	2.15 ^102%	2.2 ^100%	2.23 ^99%	2.44 ^90%	2.38 ^92%	1.99 ^111%
CCT	7016 ^93%	6254 ^104%	6068 ^107%	7641 ^85%	6160 ^106%	6528 ^100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	35.2	71.8 104%	56 59%	58 65%	36 2%	36.6 4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	55.6	98.5 77%	86 55%	88 58%	58 4%	57.6 4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		18% / 29%	3% / 20%	11% / 26%	-11% / 7%	-4% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12.8 ms rise
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Asus VivoBook S15 S532F GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø502 (489.9-680.49)

Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø704 (683.27-815.1)

Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø470 (467.49-492.88)

Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø588 (570.26-651.27)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD Intel Core i7-8565U	191 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U (138.3 - 193, n=51)	172.5 Points +3%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	171 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 Intel Core i7-8550U	168 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F Intel Core i7-8565U	168 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB Intel Core i7-7500U	146 Points -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	146 Points -13%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB Intel Core i5-8250U	145 Points -14%
Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE AMD Ryzen 7 2700U	136 Points -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD Intel Core i7-8565U	815 Points +20%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H	769 Points +13%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F Intel Core i7-8565U	680 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	675 (643.4^min - 674.64^max) Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE AMD Ryzen 7 2700U	654 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 Intel Core i7-8550U	651 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB Intel Core i5-8250U	613 Points -10%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U (452 - 815, n=52)	612 Points -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB Intel Core i7-7500U	338 Points -50%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

168 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

680 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

103.8 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Hjälp

... jämför

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5059 Points +22%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4443 Points +7%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4236 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	4148 Points
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG	4072 Points -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	3711 Points -11%
Essentials
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG	9291 Points +10%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8951 Points +6%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	8471 Points
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	8233 Points -3%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	8233 Points -3%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	6710 Points -21%
Productivity
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	7212 Points +11%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	7212 Points +11%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	6879 Points +6%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG	6505 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	6486 Points
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	6236 Points -4%
Digital Content Creation
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5444 Points +54%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4204 Points +19%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	3527 Points
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	3475 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	3315 Points -6%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG	3033 Points -14%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4220 Points +18%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4052 Points +13%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	3840 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	3620 Points +1%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG	3615 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	3575 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5381 Points +9%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5272 Points +7%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG	5110 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027	5025 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	4946 Points
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4620 Points -7%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3575 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4946 poäng
PCMark 10 Score		4148 poäng
Hjälp

	Asus VivoBook S15 S532F WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
AS SSD		71%	1%	102%	34%
Seq Read	1147	1320 15%	2465 115%	2469 115%	1557 36%
Seq Write	752	1500 99%	1318 75%	1991 165%	1237 64%
4K Read	41.52	30.73 -26%	42.97 3%	54.3 31%	42.56 3%
4K Write	149.7	94.4 -37%	81.9 -45%	99.8 -33%	127.2 -15%
4K-64 Read	605	1453 140%	1025 69%	1823 201%	1034 71%
4K-64 Write	453.2	1815 300%	338.6 -25%	1282 183%	1186 162%
Access Time Read *	0.073	0.061 16%	0.077 -5%	0.042 42%	0.077 -5%
Access Time Write *	0.025	0.044 -76%	0.046 -84%	0.039 -56%	0.028 -12%
Score Read	761	1616 112%	1314 73%	2125 179%	1233 62%
Score Write	678	2059 204%	552 -19%	1581 133%	1437 112%
Score Total	1821	4507 148%	2488 37%	4771 162%	3291 81%
Copy ISO MB/s	1093	2577 136%	700 -36%		1313 20%
Copy Program MB/s	775	515 -34%	167.2 -78%		334.6 -57%
Copy Game MB/s	1196	1120 -6%	370.4 -69%		684 -43%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1728 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 662 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 410.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 460.8 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1085 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 970 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.13 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 149.9 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	9536 Points +157%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK	7374 Points +99%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U	5622 Points +52%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	4133 Points +12%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	3726 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	3705 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (2939 - 3885, n=29)	3531 Points -5%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	2977 Points -20%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-14IWL-81N70056GE NVIDIA GeForce MX230, i7-8565U	2729 Points -26%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8250U	2347 Points -37%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 2500U	2310 Points -38%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	1216 Points -67%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	3565 Points +221%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	1147 Points +3%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	1138 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	1111 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (881 - 1169, n=22)	1070 Points -4%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 2500U	649 Points -42%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	349 Points -69%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	8075 Points +144%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK	6688 Points +102%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U	5209 Points +57%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	3651 Points +10%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	3377 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	3308 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (2726 - 3567, n=28)	3201 Points -3%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	2762 Points -17%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-14IWL-81N70056GE NVIDIA GeForce MX230, i7-8565U	2476 Points -25%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8250U	2212 Points -33%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 2500U	2123 Points -36%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	1112 Points -66%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	13447 Points +183%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK	9032 Points +90%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U	7016 Points +48%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	4905 Points +3%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	4826 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	4756 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3585 - 4942, n=29)	4404 Points -7%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	3593 Points -24%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-14IWL-81N70056GE NVIDIA GeForce MX230, i7-8565U	3582 Points -25%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 2500U	3549 Points -25%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8250U	2895 Points -39%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U	1911 Points -60%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	1734 Points -64%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK	8450 Points +94%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H	7595 Points +74%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U	6774 Points +55%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	4466 Points +3%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	4394 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	4357 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3532 - 4638, n=29)	4250 Points -2%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U	3902 Points -10%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-14IWL-81N70056GE NVIDIA GeForce MX230, i7-8565U	3816 Points -12%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8250U	2940 Points -33%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 2500U	2683 Points -38%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U	1862 Points -57%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	1524 Points -65%

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark 11 Performance		4946 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		12992 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		3308 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score		1223 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	62.2 fps +226%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q	42.6 fps +123%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	41 fps +115%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150	22.6 fps +18%
Asus GL552VW-DK725T Intel Core i7-6700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M	21.3 fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (16.3 - 23.1, n=27)	20.1 fps +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250	19.1 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10	15 fps -21%
Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10	13.3 fps -30%

Asus VivoBook S15 S532F: Ø33.4 (11-37)

	låg	med.	hög	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	191.8	109.2	88.3	33.7
The Witcher 3 (2015)	66.9	36.8	19.1	10.7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	24	7

	Asus VivoBook S15 S532F GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Noise		-3%	-2%	-3%	-5%	-4%
off / environment *	28	28.2 -1%	30.13 -8%	30.3 -8%	30.5 -9%	29.9 -7%
Idle Minimum *	28	28.5 -2%	30.13 -8%	30.3 -8%	30.5 -9%	29.9 -7%
Idle Average *	28	28.6 -2%	30.13 -8%	30.3 -8%	30.5 -9%	29.9 -7%
Idle Maximum *	30	28.8 4%	30.13 -0%	30.3 -1%	30.5 -2%	29.9 -0%
Load Average *	41.4	36.2 13%	38.8 6%	39.3 5%	40.8 1%	41.7 -1%
Witcher 3 ultra *	41.5	47.6 -15%
Load Maximum *	41.5	47.6 -15%	38.8 7%	39.6 5%	41.8 -1%	41.7 -0%

* ... smaller is better

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		28 / 28 / 30 dB(A)
Hög belastning		41.4 / 41.5 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28 dB(A)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


31.2 °C	45.4 °C	38.2 °C
29.2 °C	39 °C	36.2 °C
29 °C	28.4 °C	30.6 °C

Max: 45.4 °C
Medel: 34.1 °C


40.6 °C	40.4 °C	32 °C
36.2 °C	40.8 °C	29.8 °C
30 °C	30.4 °C	29.4 °C

Max: 40.8 °C
Medel: 34.4 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 46.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 22.4 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


28 °C	29.6 °C	29.6 °C
27.6 °C	29.2 °C	28.6 °C
28.6 °C	28.8 °C	27.8 °C

Max: 29.6 °C
Medel: 28.6 °C


30.8 °C	31 °C	30 °C
30.2 °C	31.2 °C	28.2 °C
28.4 °C	29.2 °C	30 °C

Max: 31.2 °C
Medel: 29.9 °C

Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


34 °C	44 °C	42.4 °C
30.2 °C	39.4 °C	37.8 °C
30.6 °C	30.2 °C	32 °C

Max: 44 °C
Medel: 35.6 °C


40.4 °C	39.8 °C	31.2 °C
35.6 °C	37.8 °C	28.2 °C
28.4 °C	30 °C	28.8 °C

Max: 40.4 °C
Medel: 33.4 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 46.8 °C | Rumstemperatur 22.8 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.2 °C / -5.8 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus VivoBook S15 S532F audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.36 / 4.2 Watt
Låg belastning	6 / 10.3 / 10.5 Watt
Hög belastning	69.1 / 88 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus VivoBook S15 S532F i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60	HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng R5 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Power Consumption		-44%	31%	8%	14%	23%
Idle Minimum *	6	7.1 -18%	4.8 20%	3.7 38%	2.7 55%	4.4 27%
Idle Average *	10.3	13.6 -32%	7 32%	8 22%	8 22%	6.9 33%
Idle Maximum *	10.5	14.1 -34%	9.5 10%	9.8 7%	10.6 -1%	9.9 6%
Load Average *	69.1	103.9 -50%	40.8 41%	85 -23%	74 -7%	55 20%
Witcher 3 ultra *	57.8	103 -78%
Load Maximum *	88	130.9 -49%	44.3 50%	92.4 -5%	89 -1%	63.4 28%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		10tim 55min
WiFi Websurfing		5tim 06min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		1tim 26min

	Asus VivoBook S15 S532F i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 42 Wh	Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 97 Wh	HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng R5 2500U, Vega 8, 55.8 Wh	Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 79 Wh	Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 73 Wh	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh	Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 42 Wh
Battery Runtime		26%	39%	73%	104%	30%	27%
Reader / Idle	655	899 37%		1356 107%	1587 142%	773 18%
WiFi v1.3	306	514 68%	426 39%	588 92%	519 70%	414 35%	388 27%
Load	86	62 -28%		102 19%	171 99%	117 36%

För

+ ScreenPad 2.0 är mer ljusstark, smidigare, snabbare och lättare att använda än ScreenPad 1.0

+ diskret '1D13' GeForce MX250-grafik; respektabel grafikprestanda

+ 2x M.2 2280, 1x SODIMM-expansionsplats

+ grå matta ytor som döljer fingeravtryck

+ relativt billig

+ MicroSD-kortläsare

Emot

- ScreenPad-ljusstyrkan ändras dramatiskt beroende på betraktningsvinkel

- CPU-prestanda under genomsnittet; dålig Turbo Boost-prestanda

- batteritiden är bara medelmåttig; låg batterikapacitet

- saknar fingeravtrycksläsare och Kensington-lås

- förlitar sig fortfarande på propretiär AC-adapter

- ScreenPad är fortfarande en aning grynig

- långsam MicroSD-prestanda

- svår att serva

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

I vår recension av den första ZenBook Pro 15 med ScreenPad 1.0 kallade vi den för en av sin natur användbar innovation som dock led av ett flertal förstagenerationsproblem som hög inlärningskurva, klumpigt gränssnitt, en riktigt grynig skärm och reducerad batteritid. ScreenPad 2.0 åtgärdar många av dessa klagomål med en större storlek, en mer ljusstark skärm och ett uppdaterat Android-liknande gränssnitt i en laptop som bara kostar hälften så mycket som ZenBook Pro 15. Det är vanligt att användare hoppar över första generationens produkter då andra generationen nästan alltid är betydligt bättre och billigare. Detta hade inte kunnat vara mer sant för ScreenPad 2.0; Om du tilltalades av Asus teknik men valde att vänta förra året är årets billiga VivoBook läget att ta klivet.

ScreenPad 2.0 är inte på något sätt perfekt. Det matta överdraget är fortfarande en aning grynigt, särskilt när man jämför med de skarpa blanka skärmarna som sitter på telefonerna vi har i våra fickor. Den extra skärmen påverkar fortfarande batteritiden och Windows är inte särskilt optimerat för en skärm med så låg PPI. Kanske hade en ScreenPad med samma upplösning, kontrast och färg som huvudskärmen skapat en bättre synergi mellan de båda.

Vad det gäller själva datorn så är processorn långsammare än genomsnittet på grund av sin begränsade förmåga att upprätthålla Turbo Boost. Som tur är påverkar detta inte spelprestandan, vilket gör VivoBook till en bra lösning för både arbete och casual-spelande.

ScreenPad är inte bara en nymodighet som försöker vara annorlunda. Dess bildförhållande och funktion som andra skärm gör den objektivt sett mer användbar än Apples Touch Bar-lösning. Det finns fortfarande en hel del problem att lösa, särskilt när det gäller grynighet, men detta är ett stort steg i rätt riktning jämfört med förra årets ScreenPad 1.0.

Asus VivoBook S15 S532F - 2019-07-23 07/23/2019 v6^(old)
Allen Ngo

Design

77 / 98 → 78%

Tangentbord

79%

Mus

81%

Anslutningar

46 / 81 → 57%

Vikt

65 / 20-67 → 97%

Batteri

82%

Skärm

83%

Spelprestanda

77 / 85 → 90%

Programprestanda

92 / 92 → 100%

Temperatur

89%

Ljudnivå

90 / 95 → 95%

Audio

50%

Camera

39 / 85 → 46%

Medel

73%

83%

Multimedia - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5190 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Debut för ScreenPad 2.0: Recension av Asus VivoBook S15 S532FL (Sammanfattning)

Allen Ngo, 2019-07-25 (Update: 2019-07-25)

Debut för ScreenPad 2.0: Recension av Asus VivoBook S15 S532FL (Sammanfattning)

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Asus VivoBook S15 S532F audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare