Notebookcheck

Debut för ScreenPad 2.0: Recension av Asus VivoBook S15 S532FL (Sammanfattning)

Sagan om de två skärmarna. Asus andra försök med en styrplatteskärms-hybrid är mycket bättre än första generationens ScreenPad som satt på förra årets ZenBook Pro 15 UX580 när det kommer till användbarhet och skärmkvalitet. Några hinder återstår, som påverkan på batteritiden, det gryniga matta överdraget och de dåliga betraktningsvinklarna.
Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (översatt av Daniel Eriksson),
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F (VivoBook S15 S532 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8565U 4 x 1.8 - 4.6 GHz, Whiskey Lake-U
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 - 2048 MB, Kärna: 1519 MHz, Minne: 1502 MHz, GDDR5, 419.72, Optimus
Minne
8192 MB 
, 4 GB fastlött + 4 GB Samsung DDR4-2666 (1x SODIMM), 1200 MHz, 17-17-17-39
Skärm
15.6 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS, LGD0563, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Hårddisk
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, 256 GB 
Ljudkort
Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS
Anslutningar
2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Ljudanslutningar: Kombinerad 3.5 mm, Kortläsare: MicroSD-kortläsare
Nätverk
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 18 x 357.2 x 230.3
Batteri
42 Wh Litiumpolymer, 3 celler
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, ScreenPad 2.0, Asus E-Service, McAfee LiveSafe, 12 Månader Garanti
Vikt
1.8 kg, Strömförsörjning: 325 g
Pris
800 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

363.4 mm 243.5 mm 17.95 mm 1.8 kg359.7 mm 248.8 mm 19.6 mm 2.1 kg361 mm 243 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg358.8 mm 243.5 mm 17.95 mm 1.9 kg357.2 mm 230.3 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg357 mm 235 mm 17 mm 2 kg354 mm 220 mm 18 mm 1.6 kg
Framsidan: Inga portar
Framsidan: Inga portar
Höger: MicroSD-kortläsare, Kombinerad ljudanslutning 3.5 mm, USB Typ C Gen. 1, USB 3.0, HDMI, AC-adapter
Höger: MicroSD-kortläsare, Kombinerad ljudanslutning 3.5 mm, USB Typ C Gen. 1, USB 3.0, HDMI, AC-adapter
Baksidan: Inga portar
Baksidan: Inga portar
Vänster: 2x USB 2.0
Vänster: 2x USB 2.0
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
176.6 MB/s ∼100% +430%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77.8 MB/s ∼44% +134%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-14IWL-81N70056GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
71.6 MB/s ∼41% +115%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
65.6 MB/s ∼37% +97%
Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
34 MB/s ∼19% +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II)
33.3 MB/s ∼19%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
207.82 MB/s ∼100% +484%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88.2 MB/s ∼42% +148%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-14IWL-81N70056GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83.7 MB/s ∼40% +135%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼38% +119%
Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
38.3 MB/s ∼18% +8%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II)
35.6 MB/s ∼17%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
651 (min: 547, max: 681) MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
638 MBit/s ∼98% +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
610 MBit/s ∼94%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
522 (min: 371, max: 601) MBit/s ∼80% -14%
Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
487 MBit/s ∼75% -20%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
648 (min: 626, max: 667) MBit/s ∼100% +35%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
644 (min: 499, max: 661) MBit/s ∼99% +34%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
643 MBit/s ∼99% +34%
Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
564 MBit/s ∼87% +18%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
479 MBit/s ∼74%
258.4
cd/m²
260.6
cd/m²
243.3
cd/m²
260.1
cd/m²
262.3
cd/m²
250.2
cd/m²
235.7
cd/m²
245.6
cd/m²
233.4
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 262.3 cd/m² Medel: 250 cd/m² Minimum: 13.02 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 262.3 cd/m²
Kontrast: 610:1 (Svärta: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.81 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9, calibrated: 5.36
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
55.6% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 35.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
LQ156D1, IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
Chi Mei CM15E9, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
BOE07D8, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
BOE NV156FHM-N48, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS LED, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
-72%
-35%
-68%
-60%
-34%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
24.8 (12.8, 12)
52.4 (27.6, 24.8)
-111%
40 (22, 18)
-61%
45 (21, 24)
-81%
45 (23, 22)
-81%
38.8 (20.8, 18)
-56%
Response Time Black / White *
24 (14, 10)
31.6 (18, 13.6)
-32%
26 (14, 12)
-8%
37 (23, 14)
-54%
33 (18, 15)
-38%
26.8 (16, 10.8)
-12%
PWM Frequency
1000 (25)
25000 (30)
250 (90)
Screen
28%
34%
31%
19%
18%
Brightness middle
262.3
451.9
72%
221
-16%
311
19%
278
6%
262
0%
Brightness
250
414
66%
207
-17%
303
21%
271
8%
256
2%
Brightness Distribution
89
81
-9%
87
-2%
81
-9%
89
0%
90
1%
Black Level *
0.43
0.36
16%
0.15
65%
0.24
44%
0.26
40%
0.21
51%
Contrast
610
1255
106%
1473
141%
1296
112%
1069
75%
1248
105%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.81
5.62
3%
4.35
25%
5.1
12%
4.73
19%
5.8
-0%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
14.7
19.1
-30%
8.98
39%
8.91
39%
8.38
43%
14.3
3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
5.36
2.69
50%
2.48
54%
5.17
4%
4.6
14%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.8
6.9
-146%
3.09
-10%
4.93
-76%
2.59
7%
2.5
11%
Gamma
2.15 102%
2.2 100%
2.23 99%
2.44 90%
2.38 92%
1.99 111%
CCT
7016 93%
6254 104%
6068 107%
7641 85%
6160 106%
6528 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
35.2
71.8
104%
56
59%
58
65%
36
2%
36.6
4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
55.6
98.5
77%
86
55%
88
58%
58
4%
57.6
4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-22% / 13%
-1% / 23%
-19% / 16%
-21% / 7%
-8% / 10%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.8 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18037 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820Tooltip
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø502 (489.9-680.49)
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø704 (683.27-815.1)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø470 (467.49-492.88)
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø588 (570.26-651.27)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U
191 Points ∼85% +14%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (138 - 193, n=50)
172 Points ∼77% +2%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
171 Points ∼76% +2%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4
Intel Core i7-8550U
168 Points ∼75% 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
Intel Core i7-8565U
168 Points ∼75%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB
Intel Core i7-7500U
146 Points ∼65% -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
146 Points ∼65% -13%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB
Intel Core i5-8250U
145 Points ∼65% -14%
Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
136 Points ∼61% -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U
815 Points ∼19% +20%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
769 Points ∼18% +13%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
Intel Core i7-8565U
680 Points ∼16%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
675 (min: 643.4, max: 674.64) Points ∼15% -1%
Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
654 Points ∼15% -4%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4
Intel Core i7-8550U
651 Points ∼15% -4%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB
Intel Core i5-8250U
613 Points ∼14% -10%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (452 - 815, n=51)
610 Points ∼14% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB
Intel Core i7-7500U
338 Points ∼8% -50%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
168 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
680 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
103.75 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Hjälp
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5444 Points ∼42% +54%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4204 Points ∼32% +19%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
3527 Points ∼27%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3475 Points ∼27% -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027
3315 Points ∼26% -6%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
3033 Points ∼23% -14%
Productivity
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7212 Points ∼69% +11%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
7212 Points ∼69% +11%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
6879 Points ∼66% +6%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
6505 Points ∼62% 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
6486 Points ∼62%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027
6236 Points ∼60% -4%
Essentials
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
9291 Points ∼81% +10%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8951 Points ∼78% +6%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
8471 Points ∼74%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
8233 Points ∼72% -3%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
8233 Points ∼72% -3%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027
6710 Points ∼59% -21%
Score
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5059 Points ∼62% +22%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4443 Points ∼55% +7%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4236 Points ∼52% +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4148 Points ∼51%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
4072 Points ∼50% -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027
3711 Points ∼46% -11%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5381 Points ∼82% +9%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5272 Points ∼80% +7%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
5110 Points ∼78% +3%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027
5025 Points ∼76% +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4946 Points ∼75%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4620 Points ∼70% -7%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4220 Points ∼69% +18%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4052 Points ∼67% +13%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
3840 Points ∼63% +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027
3620 Points ∼59% +1%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
3615 Points ∼59% +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
3575 Points ∼59%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3575 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4946 poäng
Hjälp
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
AS SSD
71%
1%
102%
34%
Copy Game MB/s
1196.12
1119.94
-6%
370.35
-69%
684.39
-43%
Copy Program MB/s
774.94
515.14
-34%
167.2
-78%
334.61
-57%
Copy ISO MB/s
1093.22
2576.73
136%
700.22
-36%
1312.95
20%
Score Total
1821
4507
148%
2488
37%
4771
162%
3291
81%
Score Write
678
2059
204%
552
-19%
1581
133%
1437
112%
Score Read
761
1616
112%
1314
73%
2125
179%
1233
62%
Access Time Write *
0.025
0.044
-76%
0.046
-84%
0.039
-56%
0.028
-12%
Access Time Read *
0.073
0.061
16%
0.077
-5%
0.042
42%
0.077
-5%
4K-64 Write
453.18
1814.74
300%
338.56
-25%
1281.75
183%
1186.21
162%
4K-64 Read
604.92
1453.01
140%
1024.83
69%
1823.43
201%
1034.43
71%
4K Write
149.72
94.4
-37%
81.91
-45%
99.81
-33%
127.16
-15%
4K Read
41.52
30.73
-26%
42.97
3%
54.26
31%
42.56
3%
Seq Write
752.41
1500.4
99%
1318.2
75%
1990.72
165%
1236.86
64%
Seq Read
1146.57
1319.61
15%
2464.71
115%
2468.59
115%
1557.17
36%

* ... smaller is better

WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1728 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 662.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 410.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 460.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1085 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 969.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.13 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 149.9 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
3565 Points ∼24% +221%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U
1147 Points ∼8% +3%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
1138 Points ∼8% +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
1111 Points ∼7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (881 - 1169, n=15)
1067 Points ∼7% -4%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, R5 2500U
649 Points ∼4% -42%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
349 Points ∼2% -69%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
9536 Points ∼23% +157%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
7374 Points ∼18% +99%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U
5622 Points ∼14% +52%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4133 Points ∼10% +12%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U
3726 Points ∼9% +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
3705 Points ∼9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (2939 - 3885, n=22)
3529 Points ∼9% -5%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
2977 Points ∼7% -20%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-14IWL-81N70056GE
NVIDIA GeForce MX230, i7-8565U
2729 Points ∼7% -26%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8250U
2347 Points ∼6% -37%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, R5 2500U
2310 Points ∼6% -38%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
1216 Points ∼3% -67%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
8075 Points ∼27% +144%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
6688 Points ∼23% +102%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U
5209 Points ∼18% +57%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
3651 Points ∼12% +10%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U
3377 Points ∼11% +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
3308 Points ∼11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (2737 - 3567, n=21)
3190 Points ∼11% -4%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
2762 Points ∼9% -17%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-14IWL-81N70056GE
NVIDIA GeForce MX230, i7-8565U
2476 Points ∼8% -25%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8250U
2212 Points ∼7% -33%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, R5 2500U
2123 Points ∼7% -36%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
1112 Points ∼4% -66%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
8450 Points ∼37% +94%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
7595 Points ∼34% +74%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U
6774 Points ∼30% +55%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4466 Points ∼20% +3%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U
4394 Points ∼19% +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
4357 Points ∼19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (3532 - 4638, n=21)
4251 Points ∼19% -2%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
3902 Points ∼17% -10%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-14IWL-81N70056GE
NVIDIA GeForce MX230, i7-8565U
3816 Points ∼17% -12%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8250U
2940 Points ∼13% -33%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, R5 2500U
2683 Points ∼12% -38%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U
1862 Points ∼8% -57%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
1524 Points ∼7% -65%
1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
13447 Points ∼26% +183%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
9032 Points ∼18% +90%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U
7016 Points ∼14% +48%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U
4905 Points ∼10% +3%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4826 Points ∼9% +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
4756 Points ∼9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (3593 - 4942, n=21)
4420 Points ∼9% -7%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-55G-768V
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
3593 Points ∼7% -24%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-14IWL-81N70056GE
NVIDIA GeForce MX230, i7-8565U
3582 Points ∼7% -25%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, R5 2500U
3549 Points ∼7% -25%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8250U
2895 Points ∼6% -39%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U
1911 Points ∼4% -60%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U
1734 Points ∼3% -64%
3DMark 11 Performance
4946 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
12992 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3308 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
1223 poäng
Hjälp
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
62.2 fps ∼100% +226%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
42.6 fps ∼68% +123%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
41 fps ∼66% +115%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
22.6 fps ∼36% +18%
Asus GL552VW-DK725T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
21.3 fps ∼34% +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (16.3 - 23.1, n=20)
20.1 fps ∼32% +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
19.1 fps ∼31%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
15 fps ∼24% -21%
Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
13.3 fps ∼21% -30%
010203040Tooltip
: Ø33.4 (11-37)
låg med. hög ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 191.8 109.2 88.3 33.7 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 66.9 36.8 19.1 10.7 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 24 7 fps
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Noise
-3%
-2%
-3%
-5%
-4%
off / environment *
28
28.2
-1%
30.13
-8%
30.3
-8%
30.5
-9%
29.9
-7%
Idle Minimum *
28
28.5
-2%
30.13
-8%
30.3
-8%
30.5
-9%
29.9
-7%
Idle Average *
28
28.6
-2%
30.13
-8%
30.3
-8%
30.5
-9%
29.9
-7%
Idle Maximum *
30
28.8
4%
30.13
-0%
30.3
-1%
30.5
-2%
29.9
-0%
Load Average *
41.4
36.2
13%
38.8
6%
39.3
5%
40.8
1%
41.7
-1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
41.5
47.6
-15%
Load Maximum *
41.5
47.6
-15%
38.8
7%
39.6
5%
41.8
-1%
41.7
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
28 / 28 / 30 dB(A)
Hög belastning
41.4 / 41.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 28 dB(A)
 31.2 °C45.4 °C38.2 °C 
 29.2 °C39 °C36.2 °C 
 29 °C28.4 °C30.6 °C 
Max: 45.4 °C
Medel: 34.1 °C
40.6 °C40.4 °C32 °C
36.2 °C40.8 °C29.8 °C
30 °C30.4 °C29.4 °C
Max: 40.8 °C
Medel: 34.4 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  46.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 22.4 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 31 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 38.9 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-3 °C / -5.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204443.12539.940.23138.638.5404039.25037.437.76336.9378037.336.110035.236.61253440.816033.75420033.258.625031.860.131531.661.340031.263.250030.766.763030.668.380029.672.2100029.468.912502965.8160028.764.2200028.667.8250028.459.5315028.259.5400028.364.150002866.7630027.863.7800027.864.81000027.968.51250027.770.11600027.675.5SPL4178.7N4.145.6median 29median 64.2Delta1.83.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus VivoBook S15 S532FApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.36 / 4.2 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 6 / 10.3 / 10.5 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 69.1 / 88 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
R5 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-44%
31%
8%
14%
23%
Idle Minimum *
6
7.1
-18%
4.8
20%
3.7
38%
2.7
55%
4.4
27%
Idle Average *
10.3
13.6
-32%
7
32%
8
22%
8
22%
6.9
33%
Idle Maximum *
10.5
14.1
-34%
9.5
10%
9.8
7%
10.6
-1%
9.9
6%
Load Average *
69.1
103.9
-50%
40.8
41%
85
-23%
74
-7%
55
20%
Witcher 3 ultra *
57.8
103
-78%
Load Maximum *
88
130.9
-49%
44.3
50%
92.4
-5%
89
-1%
63.4
28%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
10tim 55min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5tim 06min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 26min
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 42 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 97 Wh
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
R5 2500U, Vega 8, 55.8 Wh
Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 79 Wh
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 73 Wh
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T
i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 42 Wh
Battery Runtime
26%
39%
73%
104%
30%
27%
Reader / Idle
655
899
37%
1356
107%
1587
142%
773
18%
WiFi v1.3
306
514
68%
426
39%
588
92%
519
70%
414
35%
388
27%
Load
86
62
-28%
102
19%
171
99%
117
36%

För

+ ScreenPad 2.0 är mer ljusstark, smidigare, snabbare och lättare att använda än ScreenPad 1.0
+ diskret '1D13' GeForce MX250-grafik; respektabel grafikprestanda
+ 2x M.2 2280, 1x SODIMM-expansionsplats
+ grå matta ytor som döljer fingeravtryck
+ relativt billig
+ MicroSD-kortläsare

Emot

- ScreenPad-ljusstyrkan ändras dramatiskt beroende på betraktningsvinkel
- CPU-prestanda under genomsnittet; dålig Turbo Boost-prestanda
- batteritiden är bara medelmåttig; låg batterikapacitet
- saknar fingeravtrycksläsare och Kensington-lås
- förlitar sig fortfarande på propretiär AC-adapter
- ScreenPad är fortfarande en aning grynig
- långsam MicroSD-prestanda
- svår att serva
Recension av Asus VivoBook S15 S532FL
Recension av Asus VivoBook S15 S532FL

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

I vår recension av den första ZenBook Pro 15 med ScreenPad 1.0 kallade vi den för en av sin natur användbar innovation som dock led av ett flertal förstagenerationsproblem som hög inlärningskurva, klumpigt gränssnitt, en riktigt grynig skärm och reducerad batteritid. ScreenPad 2.0 åtgärdar många av dessa klagomål med en större storlek, en mer ljusstark skärm och ett uppdaterat Android-liknande gränssnitt i en laptop som bara kostar hälften så mycket som ZenBook Pro 15. Det är vanligt att användare hoppar över första generationens produkter då andra generationen nästan alltid är betydligt bättre och billigare. Detta hade inte kunnat vara mer sant för ScreenPad 2.0; Om du tilltalades av Asus teknik men valde att vänta förra året är årets billiga VivoBook läget att ta klivet.

ScreenPad 2.0 är inte på något sätt perfekt. Det matta överdraget är fortfarande en aning grynigt, särskilt när man jämför med de skarpa blanka skärmarna som sitter på telefonerna vi har i våra fickor. Den extra skärmen påverkar fortfarande batteritiden och Windows är inte särskilt optimerat för en skärm med så låg PPI. Kanske hade en ScreenPad med samma upplösning, kontrast och färg som huvudskärmen skapat en bättre synergi mellan de båda.

Vad det gäller själva datorn så är processorn långsammare än genomsnittet på grund av sin begränsade förmåga att upprätthålla Turbo Boost. Som tur är påverkar detta inte spelprestandan, vilket gör VivoBook till en bra lösning för både arbete och casual-spelande.

ScreenPad är inte bara en nymodighet som försöker vara annorlunda. Dess bildförhållande och funktion som andra skärm gör den objektivt sett mer användbar än Apples Touch Bar-lösning. Det finns fortfarande en hel del problem att lösa, särskilt när det gäller grynighet, men detta är ett stort steg i rätt riktning jämfört med förra årets ScreenPad 1.0. 

Asus VivoBook S15 S532F - 07/23/2019 v6(old)
Allen Ngo

Design
77 / 98 → 78%
Tangentbord
79%
Mus
81%
Anslutningar
46 / 81 → 57%