Notebookcheck

Test: Asus ROG GU501GM (i7-8750H, GTX 1060) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Sam Medley, 👁 Allen Ngo (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 06/15/2018

Vissla när du jobbar. Förpackad i ett attraktivt och tunt paket är Asus ROG GU501GM en kompetent spelmaskin som effektivt gifter stil och kraft. Tyvärr så är CPU-stabilitet och fläktljud stora problem med en i övrigt utmärkt, om än dyr, laptop.

Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Kärna: 1405 MHz, Minne: 2002 MHz, GDDR5, NVIDIA GeForce Game Ready Driver 397.64, NVIDIA Optimus
Minne
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2666 / PC4-21300 (1333.3 MHz), 1x16 GB
Skärm
15.6 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, AU Optronics AUO45ED, IPS, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel HM370
Hårddisk
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, 128 GB 
, 128 GB PCIe NVMe SSD + 1 TB 5400 RPM SSHD (8 GB SSD cache), 1049 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Anslutningar
4 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: kombinerad ljud ut/in, Brightness Sensor
Nätverk
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 17.8 x 384 x 262
Batteri
55 Wh Litiumjon, 4 celler
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2x 2 W, Tangentbord: Chiclet, RGB (ROG Aura Core), Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Asus ROG Gaming Center, ROG Aura Core, Asus Sonic Studio, 12 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.499 kg
Pris
1900 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Vänster: DC, HDMI, 3x USB 3.1 Gen 2, kombinerad ljudanslutning
Vänster: DC, HDMI, 3x USB 3.1 Gen 2, kombinerad ljudanslutning
Höger: USB 3.1 Gen 2, Thunderbolt 3, Kensington-Lås
Höger: USB 3.1 Gen 2, Thunderbolt 3, Kensington-Lås
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
682 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
682 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Aorus X5 v8
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
673 MBit/s ∼99% +1%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
666 MBit/s ∼98%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
660 MBit/s ∼97% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=173)
594 MBit/s ∼87% -11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s ∼100% +12%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
593 MBit/s ∼90%
Aorus X5 v8
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
587 MBit/s ∼89% -1%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
585 MBit/s ∼88% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
551 MBit/s ∼83% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (213 - 697, n=173)
532 MBit/s ∼80% -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
379 MBit/s ∼57% -36%
271.4
cd/m²
278.3
cd/m²
277.2
cd/m²
288.3
cd/m²
286.7
cd/m²
278.3
cd/m²
296.2
cd/m²
278.7
cd/m²
278.2
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 296.2 cd/m² Medel: 281.5 cd/m² Minimum: 15.54 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 286.7 cd/m²
Kontrast: 735:1 (Svärta: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.17 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
87% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.274
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
AU Optronics AUO45ED, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Aorus X5 v8
AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Acer Predator Triton 700
AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
49%
71%
52%
48%
-26%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
30.8 (13.6, 17.2)
17.6 (9.2, 8.4)
43%
6.6 (3.4, 3.2)
79%
16.8 (8.4, 8.4)
45%
18.8 (10, 8.8)
39%
44.8 (21.2, 23.6)
-45%
Response Time Black / White *
27.6 (16, 11.6)
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
54%
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
62%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
59%
12 (7.6, 4.4)
57%
29.6 (15.6, 14)
-7%
PWM Frequency
Screen
21%
-13%
27%
23%
-13%
Brightness middle
286.7
254
-11%
307
7%
313
9%
271
-5%
291
1%
Brightness
281
262
-7%
296
5%
300
7%
259
-8%
277
-1%
Brightness Distribution
92
89
-3%
89
-3%
78
-15%
87
-5%
84
-9%
Black Level *
0.39
0.22
44%
0.25
36%
0.33
15%
0.27
31%
0.22
44%
Contrast
735
1155
57%
1228
67%
948
29%
1004
37%
1323
80%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.17
2.37
43%
5.74
-38%
1.29
69%
1.81
57%
5.52
-32%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.22
4.71
35%
11.32
-57%
2.04
72%
3.33
54%
10.72
-48%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
1.58
37%
6.44
-158%
0.69
72%
1.09
56%
6.59
-164%
Gamma
2.274 97%
2.48 89%
2.48 89%
2.43 91%
2.45 90%
2.44 90%
CCT
6885 94%
6785 96%
8395 77%
6550 99%
6435 101%
7816 83%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
60
5%
60
5%
60
5%
61
7%
58
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
87
92
6%
93
7%
94
8%
93
7%
89
2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.84
1.94
Total Average (Program / Settings)
35% / 25%
29% / 1%
40% / 31%
36% / 27%
-20% / -15%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.6 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8644 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z: CPU
CPU-Z: CPU
CPU-Z: Cache
CPU-Z: Cache
CPU-Z: Moderkort
CPU-Z: Moderkort
CPU-Z: Minne
CPU-Z: Minne
CPU-Z: SPD
CPU-Z: SPD
GPU-Z: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU-Z: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU-Z: GeForce GTX 1060
GPU-Z: GeForce GTX 1060
HWiNFO64
HWiNFO64
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
205 Points ∼96% +22%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Intel Core i7-8700
197 Points ∼92% +17%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
185 Points ∼87% +10%
Aorus X5 v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
182 Points ∼85% +8%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Core i7-8650U
176 Points ∼83% +5%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Intel Core i7-8705G
174 Points ∼82% +4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
173 Points ∼81% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=43)
173 Points ∼81% +3%
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
Intel Core i7-8550U
169 Points ∼79% +1%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
168 Points ∼79%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points ∼73% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 209, n=411)
151 Points ∼71% -10%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
144 Points ∼68% -14%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
140 Points ∼66% -17%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1408 Points ∼45% +27%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1378 Points ∼44% +24%
Aorus X5 v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
1265 Points ∼41% +14%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Intel Core i7-8700
1215 Points ∼39% +9%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
1129 Points ∼36% +1%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1113 Points ∼36%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=45)
1099 Points ∼35% -1%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
932 Points ∼30% -16%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
807 Points ∼26% -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1865, n=412)
742 Points ∼24% -33%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
734 Points ∼24% -34%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Intel Core i7-8705G
699 Points ∼22% -37%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Core i7-8650U
619 Points ∼20% -44%
HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA
Intel Core i7-8550U
577 Points ∼19% -48%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.33 Points ∼95% +21%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
2.09 Points ∼86% +9%
Aorus X5 v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
2.08 Points ∼85% +8%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Core i7-8650U
2.02 Points ∼83% +5%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Intel Core i7-8705G
1.97 Points ∼81% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (1.92 - 2, n=29)
1.968 Points ∼81% +3%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.96 Points ∼80% +2%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.92 Points ∼79%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼75% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=404)
1.678 Points ∼69% -13%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1.63 Points ∼67% -15%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
1.55 Points ∼64% -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
15.76 Points ∼58% +26%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.05 Points ∼56% +20%
Aorus X5 v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
13.85 Points ∼51% +10%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.55 Points ∼46%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
12.5 Points ∼46% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (9.54 - 13.5, n=29)
12.3 Points ∼45% -2%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
10.33 Points ∼38% -18%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Core i5-8300H
8.79 Points ∼32% -30%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.13 Points ∼30% -35%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Intel Core i7-8705G
7.65 Points ∼28% -39%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.2, n=505)
7.24 Points ∼27% -42%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Core i7-8650U
6.82 Points ∼25% -46%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Intel Core i7-8700
7257 Points ∼67% +13%
Aorus X5 v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
6841 Points ∼63% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (6292 - 6643, n=10)
6484 Points ∼60% +1%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
6438 Points ∼59%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Intel Core i7-8705G
6436 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.85 - 8872, n=398)
4715 Points ∼44% -27%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
4330 Points ∼40% -33%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
4286 Points ∼40% -33%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Intel Core i7-8700
38543 Points ∼77% +12%
Aorus X5 v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
36819 Points ∼74% +7%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
34488 Points ∼69%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (29952 - 35307, n=10)
33562 Points ∼67% -3%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
29330 Points ∼59% -15%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
25561 Points ∼51% -26%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Intel Core i7-8705G
23794 Points ∼48% -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.7 - 48808, n=398)
17351 Points ∼35% -50%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
353.153 s * ∼4% -181%
Average of class Gaming
  (117 - 2331, n=201)
327 s * ∼4% -161%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Core i7-8650U
268.279 s * ∼3% -114%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Intel Core i7-8700
253.095 s * ∼3% -102%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Intel Core i7-8705G
197.647 s * ∼2% -58%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (125 - 181, n=5)
154 s * ∼2% -23%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
125.49 s * ∼1%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Average of class Gaming
  (-1 - 207000, n=2871)
3173 Seconds * ∼14% -506%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (1 - 10645, n=33)
2542 Seconds * ∼11% -386%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
693.994 Seconds * ∼3% -33%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
677.2 Seconds * ∼3% -29%
Dell Latitude 7390
Intel Core i7-8650U
542 Seconds * ∼2% -4%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
523.27 Seconds * ∼2%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
Intel Core i7-8705G
503.967 Seconds * ∼2% +4%
Aorus X5 v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
483 Seconds * ∼2% +8%
Schenker XMG Apex 15
Intel Core i7-8700
460.08 Seconds * ∼2% +12%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6959
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
34488
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6438
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
69.41 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
12.55 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.92 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
103.72 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1113 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
168 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X5 v8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5953 Points ∼91% +16%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5676 Points ∼87% +11%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5662 Points ∼87% +11%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5621 Points ∼86% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (5111 - 5731, n=12)
5513 Points ∼85% +8%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
5211 Points ∼80% +2%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5111 Points ∼78%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=308)
4915 Points ∼75% -4%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (5336 - 7765, n=3)
6185 Points ∼65% +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (2303 - 9529, n=223)
5475 Points ∼57% 0%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5454 Points ∼57%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X5 v8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5773 Points ∼95% +40%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
5160 Points ∼85% +25%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4665 Points ∼77% +13%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4627 Points ∼76% +12%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (4119 - 5371, n=12)
4522 Points ∼74% +10%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4504 Points ∼74% +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=326)
4217 Points ∼69% +2%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
4119 Points ∼68%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4119 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5454 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5111 poäng
Hjälp
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Aorus X5 v8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Acer Predator Triton 700
2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
Average Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
 
AS SSD
253%
213%
129%
121%
207%
-13%
Copy Game MB/s
419.25
381 (344 - 419, n=2)
-9%
Copy Program MB/s
269.19
186 (102 - 269, n=2)
-31%
Copy ISO MB/s
772.67
608 (444 - 773, n=2)
-21%
Score Total
900
4122
358%
3649
305%
2536
182%
2515
179%
3282
265%
767 (634 - 900, n=2)
-15%
Score Write
345
2051
494%
1446
319%
939
172%
954
177%
1243
260%
271 (196 - 345, n=2)
-21%
Score Read
377
1346
257%
1471
290%
1092
190%
1061
181%
1350
258%
344 (311 - 377, n=2)
-9%
Access Time Write *
0.058
0.035
40%
0.041
29%
0.046
21%
0.044
24%
0.041
29%
0.064 (0.058 - 0.07, n=2)
-10%
Access Time Read *
0.278
0.073
74%
0.046
83%
0.119
57%
0.166
40%
0.062
78%
0.274 (0.27 - 0.278, n=2)
1%
4K-64 Write
237.04
1760.16
643%
1198.18
405%
742.09
213%
773.05
226%
913.1
285%
177 (116 - 237, n=2)
-25%
4K-64 Read
270.32
1170.26
333%
1218.4
351%
847.34
213%
856.23
217%
1056.86
291%
232 (193 - 270, n=2)
-14%
4K Write
67.1
107.15
60%
90.23
34%
80.44
20%
84.51
26%
92.99
39%
63.1 (59.1 - 67.1, n=2)
-6%
4K Read
22.62
48.94
116%
43.42
92%
23.36
3%
23.21
3%
41.47
83%
20.8 (18.9 - 22.6, n=2)
-8%
Seq Write
404.73
1834.04
353%
1580.23
290%
1163.11
187%
965.76
139%
2371.95
486%
309 (213 - 405, n=2)
-24%
Seq Read
840.77
1266.1
51%
2090.99
149%
2212.97
163%
1813.23
116%
2517.2
199%
917 (841 - 993, n=2)
9%

* ... smaller is better

Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1498 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 471.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 342.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 264.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 706.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 469.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 32.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 75.55 MB/s
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
18120 Points ∼45% +54%
Aorus X5 v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8850H
17257 Points ∼42% +47%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
14780 Points ∼36% +26%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
11733 Points ∼29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (10708 - 12298, n=73)
11545 Points ∼28% -2%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1600
11512 Points ∼28% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=440)
10267 Points ∼25% -12%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H
7610 Points ∼19% -35%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8305G
7355 Points ∼18% -37%
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H
6356 Points ∼16% -46%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE
AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), 7300HQ
5738 Points ∼14% -51%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Aorus X5 v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8850H
118612 Points ∼64% +66%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
115579 Points ∼63% +62%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
98013 Points ∼53% +37%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
71431 Points ∼39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (26770 - 86193, n=65)
70757 Points ∼38% -1%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1600
70020 Points ∼38% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=431)
62089 Points ∼34% -13%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H
51038 Points ∼28% -29%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8305G
44796 Points ∼24% -37%
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H
38881 Points ∼21% -46%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE
AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), 7300HQ
36528 Points ∼20% -49%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H
200390 Points ∼27%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8305G
165559 Points ∼23%
Average of class Gaming
  (27912 - 390417, n=153)
163607 Points ∼22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (33205 - 257260, n=33)
152262 Points ∼21%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Aorus X5 v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8850H
12471 Points ∼69% +34%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
10663 Points ∼59% +14%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
9333 Points ∼51%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
9075 Points ∼50% -3%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H
8786 Points ∼48% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (5655 - 12930, n=72)
8364 Points ∼46% -10%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1600
7838 Points ∼43% -16%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8305G
7788 Points ∼43% -17%
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H
7025 Points ∼39% -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (510 - 16949, n=514)
6864 Points ∼38% -26%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE
AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), 7300HQ
5933 Points ∼33% -36%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
23694 Points ∼46% +58%
Aorus X5 v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8850H
21823 Points ∼43% +46%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
18687 Points ∼37% +25%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1600
15182 Points ∼30% +1%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
14975 Points ∼29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (12731 - 15607, n=73)
14725 Points ∼29% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=513)
11866 Points ∼23% -21%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8305G
9862 Points ∼19% -34%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H
9147 Points ∼18% -39%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE
AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), 7300HQ
8345 Points ∼16% -44%
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H
7133 Points ∼14% -52%
3DMark 06 Standard
33570 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
13082 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
30938 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
10370 poäng
Hjälp
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value)
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
57 fps ∼35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (51 - 68.8, n=35)
61.2 fps ∼38% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.9 - 126, n=141)
62.4 fps ∼39% +9%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) (sort by value)
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
39 fps ∼34%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
52.7 fps ∼46% +35%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
59.4 fps ∼52% +52%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
52.4 fps ∼46% +34%
Aorus X5 v8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
60 fps ∼52% +54%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
62.9 fps ∼55% +61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (24 - 42.3, n=57)
38.5 fps ∼33% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=215)
44.8 fps ∼39% +15%
låg med. hög ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 19417316299fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 1661206639fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 1631207157fps
Hitman 2016 (2016) 71705946fps
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
31.4 / 31.4 / 34.2 dB(A)
Hög belastning
42.8 / 50.9 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 28.6 dB(A)
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Aorus X5 v8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
Noise
5%
-1%
-3%
-7%
-2%
off / environment *
28.6
30
-5%
29
-1%
29
-1%
30
-5%
31
-8%
Idle Minimum *
31.4
30
4%
30
4%
30
4%
33
-5%
33
-5%
Idle Average *
31.4
31
1%
31
1%
31
1%
35
-11%
34
-8%
Idle Maximum *
34.2
34
1%
33
4%
35
-2%
40
-17%
40
-17%
Load Average *
42.8
43
-0%
49
-14%
49
-14%
45
-5%
41
4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50.9
42
17%
50
2%
51
-0%
50
2%
43
16%
Load Maximum *
50.9
44
14%
52
-2%
54
-6%
55
-8%
48
6%

* ... smaller is better

 36.6 °C43 °C39.8 °C 
 29.6 °C40.6 °C34 °C 
 26 °C24.6 °C28 °C 
Max: 43 °C
Medel: 33.6 °C
46.6 °C45.2 °C41 °C
35.4 °C37.2 °C32.4 °C
27 °C28 °C28 °C
Max: 46.6 °C
Medel: 35.6 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  43.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Aorus X5 v8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
Heat
-1%
-6%
-10%
-7%
-21%
Maximum Upper Side *
43
49
-14%
52
-21%
53
-23%
50
-16%
61
-42%
Maximum Bottom *
46.6
63
-35%
49
-5%
65
-39%
62
-33%
69
-48%
Idle Upper Side *
29.2
24
18%
31
-6%
26
11%
27
8%
29
1%
Idle Bottom *
34
25
26%
31
9%
30
12%
29
15%
32
6%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.637.5253535.63135.733.94034.434.15032.236.96334.237.18031.844.910030.251.712529.257.416029.665.720028.564.325027.464.831527.563.440026.359.350026.358.963025.162.680025.666.2100025.56612502564.416002564.5200024.267250024.470.9315024.571.6400023.974.3500023.769.4630023.765.8800023.466.61000023.464.31250023.558.71600023.450.3SPL36.880.8N2.850.1median 25median 64.5Delta1.82.640.943.13638.231.531.732.539.126.729.826.13026.228.826.933.226.233.822.94224.250.122.451.520.353.720.153.119.755.619.160.719631964.717.768.617.367.417.465.617.464.117.45717.558.717.663.517.46317.560.517.557.517.461.417.361.330.375.81.435.6median 17.7median 60.52.56hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.27 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.08 / 0.8 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 12.35 / 19.98 / 25.44 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 94.28 / 140.63 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus FX503VM-EH73
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Aorus X5 v8
8850H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Predator Triton 700
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
15%
13%
-20%
-3%
-52%
-55%
Idle Minimum *
12.35
12.8
-4%
7
43%
16
-30%
14
-13%
25
-102%
28
-127%
Idle Average *
19.98
15.4
23%
11
45%
19
5%
18
10%
31
-55%
33
-65%
Idle Maximum *
25.44
15.9
37%
20
21%
26
-2%
22
14%
33
-30%
41
-61%
Load Average *
94.28
78
17%
98
-4%
103
-9%
91
3%
102
-8%
94
-0%
Load Maximum *
140.63
143.4
-2%
182
-29%
223
-59%
173
-23%
239
-70%
222
-58%
Witcher 3 ultra *
132.86
107.3
19%
132
1%
164
-23%
142
-7%
194
-46%
160
-20%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
4tim 31min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4tim 00min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
0tim 45min
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 55 Wh
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 55 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Aorus X5 v8
8850H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 92.24 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 700
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 54 Wh
Battery Runtime
73%
4%
181%
51%
-10%
Reader / Idle
271
507
87%
237
-13%
762
181%
294
8%
150
-45%
WiFi v1.3
240
362
51%
164
-32%
513
114%
144
-40%
Load
45
81
80%
70
56%
156
247%
87
93%
70
56%

För

+ smidigt och vackert chassi
+ stabilt hölje
+ anodiserat aluminium står emot fläckar och fingeravtryck
+ massor av portar, inklusive Thunderbolt 3
+ RGB-tangentbord som är bekvämt och tyst
+ högtalarna är förbluffande bra och fylliga
+ stark CPU-prestanda (bortsett från syntetisk stress)
+ stabil GPU-prestanda
+ flera fläktlägen
+ temperaturen hanteras bra i områden som är i kontakt med fingrar och händer

Emot

- CPU:n blir instabil vid syntetisk stress (med Prime95)
- liten styrplatta
- fläktljud som är irriterande gällt vid belastning
- enheten är på den tyngre sidan
- batteritiden är medioker
- placeringen av portarna är inte optimal
Recenseras: Asus GU501GM. Recensionsenhet från Asus.
Recenseras: Asus GU501GM. Recensionsenhet från Asus.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

GU501GM försöker ta det bästa från Zephyrus M till en lägre prisklass. För det mesta lyckas den. Samma smidiga och lyxiga chassi (bortsett från den eleganta gångjärnsmekanismen på bottenpanelen) klarar sig genom övergången, precis som tangentbordet, högtalarna och den toppklassade Core i7-8750H.

Tyvärr visar sig denna CPU vara en blandad kompott. Den ökade prestandan uppskattas enormt i dom flesta uppgifter, även om processorn inte verkar kunna hålla ut vid beräknings-stress. Fläktarna är ytterligare ett irritationsmoment; deras höga frekvens gnisslar i öronen och kommer bli händelsernas centrum i ett välfyllt rum eller på ett café. På plus-sidan så finns det förmildrande omständigheter för dessa problem. Även om systemet kraschar vid CPU-stress så klarar den av all annan arbetsbörda bra. Dom olika lägena för fläkten hjälper till att kontrollera fläktens ljudnivå på bekostnad av mer värme och lägre prestanda.

När allt är sagt så finns det inte mycket att ogilla med GU501GM, men med tanke på priset finns det inte mycket anledning utöver det estetiska att köpa den. Med ett rekommenderat pris på ca 17.000 kronor så är GU501GM helt enkelt för dyr för att vara rimlig; det finns andra snyggt konstruerade enheter med liknande specifikationer för mindre pengar (Asus egna Strix-serie är ett exempel). För samma pris eller en aning mer kan man uppgradera till kraftigare hårdvara och ett totalt sett bättre paket, likt vad som erbjuds av Gigabytes Aero 15x eller MSI GS65 Stealth Thin. Till och med för det aktuella priset på 13.000 kronor är det svårt att rekommendera GU501GM över andra liknande maskiner.

GU501GM är helt enkelt en lyxartikel. Även om höljet är vackert och maskinen är en kompetent mittenskikts-laptop för spel så har den ett för högt pris. Bara om man sätter design över alla andra faktorer bör man överväga att köpa GU501GM; och till och med då finns det bättre alternativ där ute.

Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 - 07/07/2018 v6
Sam Medley

Design
90 / 98 → 92%
Tangentbord
86%
Mus
75%
Anslutningar
59 / 81 → 73%
Vikt
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Batteri
75%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
93%
Programprestanda
95%
Temperatur
88 / 95 → 92%
Ljudnivå
76 / 90 → 84%
Audio
65%
Camera
30 / 85 → 35%
Medel
75%
85%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Asus ROG GU501GM (i7-8750H, GTX 1060) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Sam Medley, 2018-06-15 (Update: 2018-06-15)