Notebookcheck

Test: Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070, Full-HD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Felicitas Krohn (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 04/04/2018

Premiär för Coffee Lake. Efter att Intels nya CPU-arkitektur hade sin debut i desktop-segmentet för ett par månader sedan så finns nu Coffee Lake tillslut tillgänglig för laptops. Gamers kan se fram mot enheter såsom ROG Zephyrus M GM501 från Asus, som vi har tagit en närmare titt på i den här recensionen.

Asus Zephyrus M GM501 (Zephyrus M GM501 Serie)
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Kärna: 1443 MHz, Minne: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 389.04, Optimus
Minne
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dual-Kanal, båda platserna upptagna, max. 32 GB
Skärm
15.6 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, Full-HD, G-Sync, 144 Hz, AHVA, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel HM370
Hårddisk
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, 512 GB 
, NVMe-SSD + Seagate FireCuda ST1000LX015, 1 TB SSHD, 5400 rpm. Platser: 1x M.2 Type 2280 & 1x 2.5 tum
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC294 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Anslutningar
5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: kombinerad (hörlurar & mikrofon)
Nätverk
Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 20 x 384 x 261
Batteri
55 Wh, 3605 mAh Litiumjon, 4 celler
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2.0, Tangentbord: Chiclet 4 zoners RGB, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 230 watts nätadapter, flertalet verktyg från tillverkaren, McAfee Security testversion, XSplit Gamecaster testversion, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.51 kg, Strömförsörjning: 630 g
Pris
2399 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
698 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
684 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
683 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼98%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
682 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=180)
594 MBit/s ∼85% -13%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
585 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
551 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 697, n=180)
534 MBit/s ∼91% -9%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
524 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
413 MBit/s ∼71% -29%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
354 MBit/s ∼61% -39%
292
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
302
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 311 cd/m² Medel: 295.7 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 307 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1228:1 (Svärta: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.74 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 1.94
ΔE Greyscale 6.44 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
93% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.48
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus GX501
AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Predator Triton 700
AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Chi Mei N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Chi Mei N156HHE-GA1 (CMN15F4), TN LED, 1920x1080
Response Times
-322%
-382%
-364%
-11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
6.6 (3.4, 3.2)
40.4 (23.2, 17.2)
-512%
44.8 (21.2, 23.6)
-579%
43.2 (22.8, 20.4)
-555%
10.4 (6, 4.4)
-58%
Response Time Black / White *
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
24 (11.6, 12.4)
-131%
29.6 (15.6, 14)
-185%
28.4 (15.6, 12.8)
-173%
6.6 (4.4, 2.2)
37%
PWM Frequency
26000 (20)
25510 (25)
Screen
2%
0%
-7%
18%
Brightness middle
307
328
7%
291
-5%
338
10%
269
-12%
Brightness
296
305
3%
277
-6%
324
9%
254
-14%
Brightness Distribution
89
83
-7%
84
-6%
88
-1%
85
-4%
Black Level *
0.25
0.25
-0%
0.22
12%
0.34
-36%
0.21
16%
Contrast
1228
1312
7%
1323
8%
994
-19%
1281
4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.74
6.02
-5%
5.52
4%
5.92
-3%
3
48%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.32
10.14
10%
10.72
5%
11.77
-4%
5.62
50%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.94
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.44
6.32
2%
6.59
-2%
7.45
-16%
3.18
51%
Gamma
2.48 89%
2.28 96%
2.44 90%
2.58 85%
2.25 98%
CCT
8395 77%
8194 79%
7816 83%
6366 102%
7274 89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
60
0%
58
-3%
59
-2%
77
28%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
92
-1%
89
-4%
90
-3%
100
8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-160% / -52%
-191% / -63%
-186% / -66%
4% / 13%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.4 ms rise
↘ 3.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8929 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
Latencies
Software
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=52)
173 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points ∼98%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼93% -5%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼92% -6%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
158 Points ∼91% -7%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points ∼90% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 209, n=420)
152 Points ∼88% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
1168 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=55)
1107 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1865, n=421)
749 Points ∼64% -36%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points ∼64% -36%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points ∼63% -37%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points ∼63% -37%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
734 Points ∼63% -37%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (1.89 - 2, n=34)
1.965 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.92 Points ∼98%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.84 Points ∼94% -4%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼93% -5%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼93% -5%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼93% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=408)
1.68 Points ∼85% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Core i7-8750H
13.29 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (9.54 - 13.5, n=35)
12.3 Points ∼93% -7%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.21 Points ∼62% -38%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.15 Points ∼61% -39%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.14 Points ∼61% -39%
Acer Predator Triton 700
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.13 Points ∼61% -39%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.2, n=509)
7.28 Points ∼55% -45%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6426
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
34892
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.92 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
13.29 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
170 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1168 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 10 - Score
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (4854 - 5939, n=6)
5414 Points ∼100% +4%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
5277 Points ∼97% +2%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5194 Points ∼96%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH
5125 Points ∼95% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 6959, n=120)
4946 Points ∼91% -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4933 Points ∼91% -5%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
4542 Points ∼84% -13%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5662 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (5210 - 5968, n=6)
5621 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH
5289 Points ∼93% -7%
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
5211 Points ∼92% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5195 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
5176 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=315)
4928 Points ∼87% -13%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
5160 Points ∼100% +12%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH
5057 Points ∼98% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (4271 - 5557, n=6)
4962 Points ∼96% +7%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4627 Points ∼90%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4394 Points ∼85% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=333)
4222 Points ∼82% -9%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
4193 Points ∼81% -9%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4627 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5662 poäng
Hjälp
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Asus Zephyrus GX501
Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH
Acer Predator Triton 700
2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)
Gigabyte Aero 15X
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
Average Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
 
AS SSD
5%
2%
9%
5%
Score Total
3649
3282
-10%
3570
-2%
3848
5%
3447 (1852 - 4020, n=15)
-6%
Score Write
1446
1243
-14%
1333
-8%
1185
-18%
1267 (104 - 1507, n=15)
-12%
Score Read
1471
1350
-8%
1522
3%
1795
22%
1475 (1072 - 2067, n=15)
0%
4K Write
90.23
92.99
3%
113.85
26%
124.7
38%
114 (1.6 - 155, n=15)
26%
4K Read
43.42
41.47
-4%
46.56
7%
51.03
18%
47.8 (38.9 - 51.5, n=15)
10%
Seq Write
1580.23
2371.95
50%
1124.4
-29%
1280.96
-19%
1438 (350 - 1694, n=15)
-9%
Seq Read
2090.99
2517.2
20%
2507.7
20%
2382.08
14%
2576 (1369 - 2826, n=15)
23%
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3157 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1659 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 325.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 269.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1104 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1652 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 95.98 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
18219 Points ∼100% +7%
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
18120 Points ∼99% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (15718 - 19059, n=56)
17228 Points ∼95% +1%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17046 Points ∼94%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
14607 Points ∼80% -14%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
14394 Points ∼79% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=448)
10263 Points ∼56% -40%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator Triton 700
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
23694 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
23540 Points ∼99% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (13760 - 25604, n=58)
22405 Points ∼95% +2%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
21925 Points ∼93%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18689 Points ∼79% -15%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18205 Points ∼77% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=521)
11899 Points ∼50% -46%
3DMark 06 Standard
31045 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
18278 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
36015 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
14945 poäng
Hjälp
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
62.9 fps ∼100% +6%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
61.9 fps ∼98% +4%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
59.4 fps ∼94%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (48.2 - 68.4, n=41)
59.1 fps ∼94% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
52.4 fps ∼83% -12%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
50.2 fps ∼80% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=224)
44.5 fps ∼71% -25%
låg med. hög ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 10659.4fps
Rocket League (2017) 143fps
Dirt 4 (2017) 12678.4fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 13186.2fps
F1 2017 (2017) 11988fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 10275fps
The Evil Within 2 (2017) 59.658.1fps
ELEX (2017) 99.175fps
Call of Duty WWII (2017) 144117fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 75.654.2fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
30 / 31 / 33 dB(A)
Hög belastning
49 / 52 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
4%
-1%
2%
2%
-3%
2%
off / environment *
29
31
-7%
31
-7%
30
-3%
30
-3%
29.8 (27.8 - 32, n=48)
-3%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=227)
-1%
Idle Minimum *
30
32
-7%
33
-10%
31
-3%
31
-3%
31.9 (28.2 - 35, n=54)
-6%
31.5 (28 - 41.7, n=650)
-5%
Idle Average *
31
33
-6%
34
-10%
32
-3%
34
-10%
33.4 (29.2 - 37, n=54)
-8%
32.8 (28 - 46.6, n=650)
-6%
Idle Maximum *
33
34
-3%
40
-21%
36
-9%
35
-6%
36.3 (30.1 - 50, n=54)
-10%
34.7 (28 - 50.4, n=650)
-5%
Load Average *
49
39
20%
41
16%
39
20%
42
14%
44.5 (33.2 - 55, n=54)
9%
40.4 (30.3 - 58, n=651)
18%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50
42
16%
43
14%
44
12%
44
12%
Load Maximum *
52
46
12%
48
8%
52
-0%
46
12%
51.4 (42.2 - 62, n=54)
1%
47.6 (38.9 - 64, n=651)
8%

* ... smaller is better

 49 °C50 °C52 °C 
 41 °C47 °C45 °C 
 37 °C38 °C37 °C 
Max: 52 °C
Medel: 44 °C
43 °C43 °C49 °C
44 °C45 °C48 °C
33 °C35 °C31 °C
Max: 49 °C
Medel: 41.2 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  50 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 41.7 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-9.3 °C / -16.7 F).
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-6%
-14%
6%
3%
2%
3%
Maximum Upper Side *
52
57
-10%
61
-17%
51
2%
47
10%
47.1 (37.1 - 65, n=54)
9%
45.6 (28 - 68.8, n=615)
12%
Maximum Bottom *
49
54
-10%
69
-41%
58
-18%
63
-29%
50.9 (37.2 - 71, n=54)
-4%
49.1 (25.9 - 78, n=613)
-0%
Idle Upper Side *
31
32
-3%
29
6%
25
19%
25
19%
30.6 (25 - 40, n=54)
1%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=566)
1%
Idle Bottom *
31
31
-0%
32
-3%
25
19%
27
13%
30.3 (24.3 - 41, n=54)
2%
31.6 (21.1 - 50.3, n=564)
-2%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.243.92537.642.43131.330.14036.440.75028326326.237.28027.746.510025.555.91252459.41602165.520021.569.125021.1703152067.940018.663.950017.86363017.767.780017.569.9100017.572.2125016.972160016.772.3200016.872250017.275.1315017.280.2400017.277.1500017.376.2630017.371800017.366.91000017.364.81250017.157.81600017.245.6SPL29.586.3N1.367.1median 17.3median 69.1Delta1.84.234.433.32930.527.227.627.131.92729.42532.324.83925.241.222.438.322.845.721.753.421.357.219.860.719.56519.470.119.475.519.377.119.37619.374.619.472.919.469.319.568.719.763.519.764.619.465.819.364.919.563.419.858.619.954.219.648.431.683.21.654.2median 19.5median 64.60.67.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zephyrus M GM501Acer Predator Triton 700
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Predator Triton 700 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.6 / 1.6 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 16 / 19 / 26 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 103 / 223 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-1%
-33%
28%
21%
-21%
-11%
Idle Minimum *
16
18
-13%
28
-75%
10
37%
12
25%
21 (9 - 31, n=54)
-31%
20.1 (3.9 - 113, n=610)
-26%
Idle Average *
19
23
-21%
33
-74%
13
32%
16
16%
26.4 (14 - 38.6, n=54)
-39%
25.7 (6.8 - 119, n=610)
-35%
Idle Maximum *
26
31
-19%
41
-58%
20
23%
21
19%
31.8 (19 - 49.2, n=54)
-22%
30.7 (8.3 - 122, n=610)
-18%
Load Average *
103
79
23%
94
9%
79
23%
85
17%
118 (82 - 234, n=54)
-15%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=601)
-1%
Load Maximum *
223
196
12%
222
-0%
165
26%
162
27%
219 (170 - 309, n=54)
2%
166 (21.9 - 590, n=600)
26%
Witcher 3 ultra *
164
148
10%
160
2%
120
27%
128
22%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
3tim 57min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
2tim 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
2tim 39min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 10min
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, 55 Wh
Asus Zephyrus GX501
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 50 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 700
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 54 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15X
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 94.2 Wh
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 52.4 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-24%
-21%
185%
29%
40%
Reader / Idle
237
188
-21%
150
-37%
781
230%
340
43%
333 (39 - 1174, n=599)
41%
H.264
159
132
-17%
106
-33%
456
187%
229
44%
244 (88 - 506, n=124)
53%
WiFi v1.3
164
130
-21%
144
-12%
491
199%
232
41%
251 (78 - 622, n=273)
53%
Load
70
44
-37%
70
0%
157
124%
61
-13%
78.6 (18 - 202, n=565)
12%

För

+ val mellan G-Sync och Optimus
+ tunt, högkvalitativt hölje
+ förstklassig prestanda
+ bra inmatningsenheter
+ hyfsat ljud
+ RGB-bakgrundsbelysning
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ 144-Hz panel
+ NVMe SSD

Emot

- GTX 1070 Max-Q hade passat konceptet bättre
- irriterande startljud (kan stängas av i BIOS)
- hög ljudutveckling vid belastning
- kort batteritid på grund av litet batteri
- ingen RJ45-LAN, ingen kortläsare
ROG Zephyrus M GM501, test unit provided by Asus Germany
ROG Zephyrus M GM501, test unit provided by Asus Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Om du behöver välja mellan ROG Zephyrus GX501VI (GTX 1080 Max-Q) och ROG Zephyrus M GM501GS (GeForce GTX 1070) så hade vi personligen valt det senare alternativet. Även om GM501 är betydligt mer högljudd när den kör 3D-applikationer så är den mycket billigare samtidigt som den erbjuder nästan identisk spelprestanda och har, tycker vi, bättre inmatningsenheter. 144 Hz-skärmen har hög kontrast och stöd för G-Sync, och möjligheten till grafik-byte (Optimus) är också en stark anledning till köp.

Tyvärr kan GM501 inte klara av särskilt långa batteritider på grund av sin Optimus-teknik. Den hade behövt ett större batteri. På grund av det förblir Aero 15X nummer 1 när det kommer till portabla toppskikts-laptops på 15 tum. Konkurrensen från Acer (Predator Triton 700) samt MSI:s GS63VR kan hållas i shack av vår Zephyrus M. Gamers som reser mycket och förväntar sig hög prestanda såväl som ett tunt, behagligt lätt och snyggt hölje borde bli nöjda med GM501.

Intels sexkärniga arkitektur, som vi nu för första gången har testat i en mobil enhet, garanterar en generös ökning i prestandan hos applikationer med stöd för flera kärnor. Detta behövdes verkligen efter att AMD släppt Ryzen-baserade chips med sex och åtta kärnor. Eller som man säger: Konkurrens är bra för affärerna.

Förresten, recensioner för den splitter nya MSI GS65 och den uppdaterade Gigabyte Aero 15X (båda med Coffee Lake) kommer snart finnas tillgängliga - och dom kommer troligen vara starka konkurrenter till Zephyrus M.

Asus Zephyrus M GM501 - 04/02/2018 v6
Florian Glaser

Design
86 / 98 → 87%
Tangentbord
81%
Mus
75%
Anslutningar
59 / 81 → 73%
Vikt
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Batteri
67%
Skärm
85%
Spelprestanda
97%
Programprestanda
97%
Temperatur
80 / 95 → 84%
Ljudnivå
73 / 90 → 81%
Audio
80%
Medel
78%
86%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501
Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070, Full-HD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Florian Glaser, 2018-04- 4 (Update: 2018-04- 4)