Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Asus ROG Chimera G703 (i7-7820HK, GTX 1080, Full HD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus G703 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus G703 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 80 %
Mitt på batteriet: 274 cd/m²
Kontrast: 945:1 (Svärta: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.99 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.79
ΔE Greyscale 4.14 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.58
| Asus G703 AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080 | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160 | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 1920x1080 | Alienware 17 R4 TN LED, 2560x1440 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 30% | -5% | 25% | -9% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.5 | 86.4 32% | 66 1% | 90.3 38% | 61.2 -7% |
| sRGB Coverage | 92.4 | 100 8% | 83.7 -9% | 99.6 8% | 82.9 -10% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.6 | 99.1 49% | 61.2 -8% | 86.8 30% | 60.5 -9% |
| Response Times | -136% | -153% | 37% | -42% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 17.6 ? | 44 ? -150% | 45 ? -156% | 11.6 ? 34% | 30 ? -70% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11.2 ? | 24.8 ? -121% | 28 ? -150% | 6.8 ? 39% | 12.8 ? -14% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | ||||
| Screen | 15% | 4% | 26% | -16% | |
| Brightness middle | 274 | 332 21% | 380 39% | 274 0% | 402.3 47% |
| Brightness | 268 | 313 17% | 362 35% | 262 -2% | 372 39% |
| Brightness Distribution | 80 | 88 10% | 91 14% | 87 9% | 86 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.28 3% | 0.37 -28% | 0.26 10% | 0.62 -114% |
| Contrast | 945 | 1186 26% | 1027 9% | 1054 12% | 649 -31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.99 | 3.86 3% | 4.12 -3% | 1.36 66% | 5.6 -40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.33 | 5.88 20% | 8.19 -12% | 4.1 44% | 9.8 -34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.79 | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.14 | 4.33 -5% | 3.95 5% | 0.64 85% | 4.7 -14% |
| Gamma | 2.58 85% | 2.41 91% | 2.47 89% | 2.19 100% | 2.14 103% |
| CCT | 7352 88% | 6595 99% | 6539 99% | 6551 99% | 7519 86% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 88 47% | 55 -8% | 77 28% | 53.7 -10% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 100 9% | 84 -9% | 100 9% | 82.2 -11% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -30% /
-2% | -51% /
-19% | 29% /
27% | -22% /
-18% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5944 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6016 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5035 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Asus G703 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0) | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0) | Alienware 17 R4 SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB | Average 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -7% | -30% | -9% | -44% | 0% | |
| Seq Read | 3177 | 2533 -20% | 2261 -29% | 3137 -1% | 1752 -45% | 3177 ? 0% |
| Seq Write | 2556 | 1771 -31% | 1338 -48% | 2352 -8% | 735 -71% | 2556 ? 0% |
| 4K Read | 47.61 | 43.65 -8% | 39.52 -17% | 50.1 5% | 35.61 -25% | 47.6 ? 0% |
| 4K Write | 148.4 | 139.5 -6% | 133.8 -10% | 128.8 -13% | 113.4 -24% | 148.4 ? 0% |
| Score Read | 1633 | 1716 5% | 1118 -32% | 1412 -14% | 831 -49% | 1633 ? 0% |
| Score Write | 1519 | 1615 6% | 930 -39% | 1289 -15% | 858 -44% | 1519 ? 0% |
| Score Total | 3962 | 4173 5% | 2581 -35% | 3392 -14% | 2072 -48% | 3962 ? 0% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 21293 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 35865 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17502 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=228, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| Asus G703 | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile (61.7 - 78.1, n=23) | |
| Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 148 | 77.9 | ||
| FIFA 18 (2017) | 357 | 348 | ||
| The Evil Within 2 (2017) | 78.3 | 76.1 | ||
| ELEX (2017) | 119 | 104 | ||
| Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) | 145 | 125 | ||
| Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 98 | 83 | ||
| Call of Duty WWII (2017) | 160 | 136 | ||
| Need for Speed Payback (2017) | 144 | 135 | ||
| Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) | 147 | 124 | ||
| Fortnite (2018) | 216 | 159 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 80 | |||
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 100 | 76.4 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 35 / 36 / 38 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 46 / 54 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Asus G703 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700 | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | Alienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | 5% | -2% | 1% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 28.2 6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 35 | 34 3% | 33 6% | 33 6% | 35.6 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 36 | 35 3% | 35 3% | 34 6% | 35.6 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 38 | 40 -5% | 37 3% | 38 -0% | 35.7 6% |
| Load Average * | 46 | 45 2% | 40 13% | 44 4% | 50.2 -9% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 52 -8% | 56 -17% | 50.2 -5% | |
| Load Maximum * | 54 | 60 -11% | 50 7% | 62 -15% | 50.2 7% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.9 °C / 1.6 F).
| Asus G703 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700 | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | Alienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 6% | 6% | -4% | 3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 55 | 41 25% | 44.2 20% | 46 16% | 49.6 10% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 54 | 48 11% | 43 20% | 57 -6% | 56 -4% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 29 | 30 -3% | 32.4 -12% | 34 -17% | 29.6 -2% |
| Idle Bottom * | 32 | 35 -9% | 32.8 -3% | 35 -9% | 29.2 9% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus G703 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.8 / 1.9 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 26 / 30 / 37 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
123 / 341 Watt |
   
| |
| Asus G703 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700 | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | Alienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -7% | 4% | -14% | -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 26 | 32 -23% | 27 -4% | 34 -31% | 37.5 -44% |
| Idle Average * | 30 | 38 -27% | 32 -7% | 41 -37% | 37.6 -25% |
| Idle Maximum * | 37 | 45 -22% | 41 -11% | 50 -35% | 37.6 -2% |
| Load Average * | 123 | 96 22% | 102 17% | 106 14% | 122.4 -0% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 257 | 237 8% | 257 -0% | 180.3 30% | |
| Load Maximum * | 341 | 331 3% | 248 27% | 320 6% | 277.4 19% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus G703 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 71 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700, 82 Wh | Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 88.8 Wh | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 75 Wh | Alienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 99 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 2% | 58% | 2% | 29% | 139% | |
| Reader / Idle | 200 | 164 -18% | 313 57% | 182 -9% | 276 38% | 546 ? 173% |
| H.264 | 143 | 148 3% | 204 43% | 148 3% | 400 ? 180% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 151 | 142 -6% | 251 66% | 144 -5% | 181 20% | 368 ? 144% |
| Load | 54 | 70 30% | 90 67% | 65 20% | 69 28% | 84.7 ? 57% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Så länge som det gäller kraftfulla desktop-alternativ så kan ROG Chimera G703 ta en plats på vinnarpodiet utan några problem.
Asus har satt ihop ett väldigt framgångsrikt paket här, som inte låter sig ta några större felsteg. Inte bara ser vi tillbaka på dom förstklassiga inmatningsenheterna (tangentbord inklusive RGB-belysning) utan även dom många anslutningarna (såsom Thunderbolt 3). Skärmen och ljudkvaliteten vet också hur man övertygar. I synnerhet IPS-skärmen med sin kombination av 144 Hz och G-Sync är ett riktigt argument för köp.
Prestandan går heller inte att klandra. För att rättfärdiga det rejäla inköpspriset så har Asus utrustat 17-tummaren med ett överflöd av toppskikts-komponenter, oavsett om det är GeForce GTX 1080 eller Core i7-7820HK, som kan erbjuda sin högsta prestanda tack vare överklockning. SSD-RAID och mängden RAM är också värda att notera.
På den negativa sidan måste vi ställa den höga vikten, tjocka designen, korta batteritiden och ljudnivån vid 3D-arbete (åtminstone när OC-funktionen är aktiv) mot G703.
Trots dessa svagheter så kommer ROG Chimera få en väldigt hög plats på vår Topp 10-lista över Spellaptops.
Asus G703
-
02/27/2018 v6(old)
Florian Glaser
Pricecompare
