Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Quality does not have to be expensive. Med Redmi Note 5A Prime erbjuder Xiaomi en robust enhet på 5.5 tum till ett lågt pris. Utöver en selfiekamera på 16 MP kommer den med en infraröd sensor och kostar under 2.000 kronor. I den här recensionen klarar vi upp vilka kompromisser som har behövt göras på grund av dess låga rekommenderade pris.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime (Redmi Note 12 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Minne
3 GB 
Skärm
5.50 tum 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixlar 267 PPI, kapacitiv, native pen support, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 25 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infraröd, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm, Kortläsare: microSD, upp till 128 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, gyroskop, närhetssensor, kompass
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (B2/3/5/8), 3G WCDMA (B1/2/5/8), 4G FDD-LTE (B1/3/4/5/7/8/20), 4G TDD-LTE (B38/40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.7 x 153 x 76.2
Batteri
3080 mAh Litiumjon, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 32 tim, Standby 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 240 tim
Operativsystem
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, 1080p
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, LED-blixt, 1080p@30fps
Övrigt
Högtalare: 1 högtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, USB-laddare, MicroUSB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, MIUI Global 9.1, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värde (huvud): 0,504 W/kg, SAR-värde (kropp): 1,683 W/kg
Vikt
153 g, Strömförsörjning: 55 g
Pris
200 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime

Size comparison

158.1 mm 74.6 mm 8.8 mm 186 g158.2 mm 76.6 mm 8.4 mm 158 g153.5 mm 71.6 mm 8.5 mm 144 g153 mm 76.2 mm 7.7 mm 153 g147 mm 70.6 mm 8.8 mm 149 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Umidigi S2 Lite
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash
57.6 MBit/s +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.9 MBit/s
Alcatel 3X
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.1 MBit/s -1%
Gigaset GS185
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.7 MBit/s -4%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46.8 MBit/s -16%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s +599%
Umidigi S2 Lite
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash
56.5 MBit/s +5%
Alcatel 3X
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.7 MBit/s +2%
Gigaset GS185
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.7 MBit/s +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.8 MBit/s
HTC Desire 12 Plus
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
45 MBit/s -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Testkarta - Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Testkarta (detalj) - Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
474
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 480 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 463.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.67 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 469 cd/m²
Kontrast: 782:1 (Svärta: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.31 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
91.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.155
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
IPS, 1280x720, 5.50
Alcatel 3X
IPS, 1440x720, 5.70
HTC Desire 12 Plus
IPS, 1440x720, 6.00
Umidigi S2 Lite
IPS, 1440x720, 6.00
Gigaset GS185
IPS, 1440x720, 5.50
Screen
18%
-26%
1%
-43%
Brightness middle
469
429
-9%
418
-11%
701
49%
426
-9%
Brightness
464
421
-9%
414
-11%
720
55%
412
-11%
Brightness Distribution
92
84
-9%
93
1%
87
-5%
86
-7%
Black Level *
0.6
0.13
78%
0.7
-17%
0.5
17%
0.7
-17%
Contrast
782
3300
322%
597
-24%
1402
79%
609
-22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.31
4.86
-47%
4.2
-27%
4.97
-50%
5.3
-60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.68
8.83
-32%
8.3
-24%
13.31
-99%
10.2
-53%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.4
6
-150%
4.7
-96%
3.3
-38%
6.3
-163%
Gamma
2.155 102%
2.231 99%
2.27 97%
2.2 100%
2.4 92%
CCT
6626 98%
8103 80%
7394 88%
8056 81%
8073 81%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18110 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
45762 Points
Alcatel 3X
31718 Points -31%
Umidigi S2 Lite
43125 Points -6%
Gigaset GS185
37339 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (42643 - 46814, n=11)
44884 Points -2%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
57683 Points
Alcatel 3X
42032 Points -27%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
56497 Points -2%
Umidigi S2 Lite
56639 Points -2%
Gigaset GS185
45092 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (56672 - 59326, n=4)
57644 Points 0%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
Points
Alcatel 3X
4711 Points
HTC Desire 12 Plus
5393 Points
Umidigi S2 Lite
4371 Points
Gigaset GS185
3961 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (4316 - 5438, n=10)
4876 Points
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)
15091 Points
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
3702 Points
Alcatel 3X
3210 Points -13%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
4759 Points +29%
Umidigi S2 Lite
3348 Points -10%
Gigaset GS185
3229 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (3538 - 3928, n=11)
3737 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)
10872 Points +194%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
948 Points
Alcatel 3X
206 Points -78%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
1158 Points +22%
Umidigi S2 Lite
886 Points -7%
Gigaset GS185
676 Points -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (282 - 1072, n=9)
792 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=158, last 2 years)
5704 Points +502%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
1774 Points
Alcatel 3X
1302 Points -27%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
2898 Points +63%
Umidigi S2 Lite
1870 Points +5%
Gigaset GS185
1217 Points -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (1489 - 1980, n=9)
1734 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=158, last 2 years)
9621 Points +442%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
791 Points
Alcatel 3X
982 Points +24%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
849 Points +7%
Umidigi S2 Lite
840 Points +6%
Gigaset GS185
617 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (557 - 1224, n=9)
831 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12306, n=158, last 2 years)
6230 Points +688%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
788 Points
Alcatel 3X
150 Points -81%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
965 Points +22%
Umidigi S2 Lite
645 Points -18%
Gigaset GS185
440 Points -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (591 - 789, n=9)
759 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
13900 Points +1664%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
729 Points
Alcatel 3X
9 Points -99%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
756 Points +4%
Umidigi S2 Lite
607 Points -17%
Gigaset GS185
632 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (10 - 744, n=9)
543 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=158, last 2 years)
1487 Points +104%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
678 Points
Alcatel 3X
Points -100%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
741 Points +9%
Umidigi S2 Lite
624 Points -8%
Gigaset GS185
683 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (637 - 691, n=10)
663 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (800 - 9574, n=90, last 2 years)
5063 Points +647%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
2576 Points
Alcatel 3X
Points -100%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
3272 Points +27%
Umidigi S2 Lite
2671 Points +4%
Gigaset GS185
1871 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2210 - 2889, n=10)
2610 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=90, last 2 years)
13549 Points +426%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
2204 Points
Alcatel 3X
Points -100%
Umidigi S2 Lite
1762 Points -20%
Gigaset GS185
1460 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (1782 - 2512, n=8)
2115 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=70, last 2 years)
10590 Points +380%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
9915 Points
Alcatel 3X
3418 Points -66%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
12604 Points +27%
Umidigi S2 Lite
9774 Points -1%
Gigaset GS185
6125 Points -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (8137 - 9961, n=10)
9688 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
10202 Points
Alcatel 3X
2898 Points -72%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
12347 Points +21%
Umidigi S2 Lite
9716 Points -5%
Gigaset GS185
5474 Points -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (7924 - 10302, n=10)
9970 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
9027 Points
Alcatel 3X
9188 Points +2%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
13596 Points +51%
Umidigi S2 Lite
9984 Points +11%
Gigaset GS185
10496 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (7095 - 9345, n=10)
8887 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
602 Points
Alcatel 3X
151 Points -75%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
810 Points +35%
Umidigi S2 Lite
547 Points -9%
Gigaset GS185
68 Points -89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (465 - 635, n=11)
599 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=52, last 2 years)
3548 Points +489%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
533 Points
Alcatel 3X
125 Points -77%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
716 Points +34%
Umidigi S2 Lite
477 Points -11%
Gigaset GS185
54 Points -90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (404 - 566, n=11)
525 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=52, last 2 years)
3905 Points +633%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
1107 Points
Alcatel 3X
538 Points -51%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
1504 Points +36%
Umidigi S2 Lite
1127 Points +2%
Gigaset GS185
867 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (995 - 1360, n=11)
1188 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=52, last 2 years)
3005 Points +171%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
320 Points
Alcatel 3X
94 Points -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
441 Points +38%
Umidigi S2 Lite
378 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (230 - 341, n=11)
313 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=102, last 2 years)
2685 Points +739%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
265 Points
Alcatel 3X
76 Points -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
367 Points +38%
Umidigi S2 Lite
317 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (188 - 281, n=11)
258 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=102, last 2 years)
2675 Points +909%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
1148 Points
Alcatel 3X
546 Points -52%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
1521 Points +32%
Umidigi S2 Lite
1170 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (1016 - 1340, n=11)
1192 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=102, last 2 years)
3127 Points +172%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
20 fps
Alcatel 3X
9 fps -55%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
34 fps +70%
Umidigi S2 Lite
25 fps +25%
Gigaset GS185
13 fps -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (9.7 - 28, n=11)
20.2 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=177, last 2 years)
83.6 fps +318%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
17 fps
Alcatel 3X
4.9 fps -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
21 fps +24%
Umidigi S2 Lite
17 fps 0%
Gigaset GS185
7.6 fps -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (11 - 25, n=11)
17 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=177, last 2 years)
243 fps +1329%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
15 fps
Alcatel 3X
5 fps -67%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
18 fps +20%
Umidigi S2 Lite
13 fps -13%
Gigaset GS185
5.6 fps -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (4.5 - 16, n=11)
11.1 fps -26%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=178, last 2 years)
71.3 fps +375%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
7.6 fps
Alcatel 3X
2.2 fps -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
9.2 fps +21%
Umidigi S2 Lite
6.9 fps -9%
Gigaset GS185
2.8 fps -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (4.6 - 15, n=11)
7.51 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=178, last 2 years)
137.9 fps +1714%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
11 fps
Alcatel 3X
3.1 fps -72%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
13 fps +18%
Umidigi S2 Lite
9.9 fps -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (3.5 - 12, n=11)
8.68 fps -21%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=178, last 2 years)
60.2 fps +447%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
4.9 fps
Alcatel 3X
1.3 fps -73%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
6 fps +22%
Umidigi S2 Lite
4.6 fps -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2.3 - 5, n=11)
4.11 fps -16%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=178, last 2 years)
97 fps +1880%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
5.6 fps
Alcatel 3X
1.6 fps -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
7 fps +25%
Umidigi S2 Lite
4.8 fps -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2.1 - 5.9, n=11)
4.21 fps -25%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=178, last 2 years)
42.9 fps +666%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
2.7 fps
Alcatel 3X
0.77 fps -71%
HTC Desire 12 Plus
3.4 fps +26%
Umidigi S2 Lite
2.4 fps -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2.1 - 2.8, n=11)
2.55 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=178, last 2 years)
58.6 fps +2070%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Alcatel 3X Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 12 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Umidigi S2 Lite Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS185 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (66.1 - 104.3, n=2, last 2 years)
85.2 Points +385%
HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67)
22.16 Points +26%
Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67)
19.18 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (16.5 - 20.6, n=11)
18.2 Points +4%
Gigaset GS185 (Chrome 66)
17.76 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime (Chrome 67)
17.55 Points
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67)
15.41 Points -12%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=202, last 2 years)
33355 Points +913%
HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67)
3993 Points +21%
Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67)
3506 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime (Chrome 67)
3293 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (2689 - 3314, n=11)
3112 Points -5%
Gigaset GS185 (Chrome 66)
3084 Points -6%
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67)
2838 Points -14%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Alcatel 3X (Chrome 67)
17275 ms * -27%
Gigaset GS185 (Chrome 66)
13666 ms * -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime (Chrome 67)
13586 ms *
Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67)
13114 ms * +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (11007 - 13586, n=11)
12667 ms * +7%
HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67)
11572 ms * +15%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=165, last 2 years)
1658 ms * +88%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A PrimeAlcatel 3XHTC Desire 12 PlusUmidigi S2 LiteGigaset GS185Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-19%
-2%
-19%
-25%
-6%
766%
Sequential Read 256KB
287.1
260.5
-9%
252.8
-12%
271
-6%
275.7
-4%
242 ?(25.8 - 452, n=247)
-16%
1468 ?(215 - 4512, n=210, last 2 years)
411%
Sequential Write 256KB
120.3
127.7
6%
135.6
13%
75
-38%
45.54
-62%
100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247)
-16%
1078 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=210, last 2 years)
796%
Random Read 4KB
47.87
26.05
-46%
65.7
37%
36.4
-24%
31.71
-34%
43.2 ?(3.59 - 117.2, n=247)
-10%
242 ?(22.2 - 543, n=210, last 2 years)
406%
Random Write 4KB
17.15
9.62
-44%
9.16
-47%
11.6
-32%
9.05
-47%
22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247)
31%
266 ?(13 - 709, n=210, last 2 years)
1451%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
83.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
77.5
-8%
84.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178)
-15%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
51.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
59.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
56.5
-6%
59.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178)
-12%
Hög belastning
 42.3 °C38.7 °C38.8 °C 
 40.9 °C37.5 °C40.6 °C 
 39.9 °C37.8 °C38.8 °C 
Max: 42.3 °C
Medel: 39.5 °C
34.9 °C39.4 °C42.6 °C
35.8 °C38.9 °C40 °C
35.9 °C38.9 °C39.5 °C
Max: 42.6 °C
Medel: 38.4 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  40.1 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202728.52525.938.53129.535.34031.441.65032.640.36324.124.98023.122.810024.123.312517.21916016.619.620016.830.425016.436.431514.138.340013.853.250013.657.763012.161.280011.563.8100011.566.7125011.267.8160011.266.7200011.268.4250011.271.2315011.169.3400011.269.6500011.269.3630011.466.3800011.464.41000011.360.21250011.449.51600011.432.6SPL66.757.96023.979.6N19.310.913.70.542.5median 11.5median 60.2median 36.8median 12.2median 61.1Delta4.615.623.111.718.542.643.938.437.734.228.337.330.93030.826.627.523.223.721.223.72123.916.326.416.630.115.833.113.539.412.246.81249.711.755.110.560.49.661.29.560958.18.558.28.561.58.364.48.268.48.167.78.1618.161.38.259.78.344.68.233.951.721.959.974.97.10.31231.5median 9.5median 55.1median 36median 53.24.5142421.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 5A PrimeUmidigi S2 Lite
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 61.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 61.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 61.1% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (116.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Umidigi S2 Lite audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.5 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.8 / 2.4 / 2.9 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4 / 6.3 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
3080 mAh
Alcatel 3X
3000 mAh
HTC Desire 12 Plus
2965 mAh
Umidigi S2 Lite
5100 mAh
Gigaset GS185
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-11%
31%
10%
35%
3%
13%
Idle Minimum *
1.8
2
-11%
0.68
62%
0.8
56%
0.54
70%
1.369 ?(0.57 - 4.02, n=11)
24%
0.894 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=157, last 2 years)
50%
Idle Average *
2.4
2.5
-4%
2.05
15%
1.6
33%
1.74
27%
2.55 ?(1.4 - 6, n=11)
-6%
1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=157, last 2 years)
39%
Idle Maximum *
2.9
3.2
-10%
2.12
27%
3.5
-21%
1.78
39%
2.86 ?(1.62 - 6.64, n=11)
1%
1.632 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=157, last 2 years)
44%
Load Average *
4
5.2
-30%
3
25%
4.6
-15%
3.55
11%
4.38 ?(2.89 - 7.34, n=11)
-10%
5.55 ?(2.4 - 16.5, n=157, last 2 years)
-39%
Load Maximum *
6.3
6.3
-0%
4.57
27%
6.5
-3%
4.66
26%
5.95 ?(4 - 9.6, n=11)
6%
8.23 ?(4.32 - 20.8, n=157, last 2 years)
-31%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
WiFi Websurfing
10tim 47min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime
3080 mAh
Alcatel 3X
3000 mAh
HTC Desire 12 Plus
2965 mAh
Umidigi S2 Lite
5100 mAh
Gigaset GS185
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
647
675
4%
545
-16%
645
0%
658
2%

För

+ gedigen batteritid
+ bra förhållande mellan pris och prestanda
+ infraröd sensor

Emot

- skärm med lågt kontrastförhållande
- ingen USB Typ C
Recenseras: Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime. Recensionsex från:
Recenseras: Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime. Recensionsex från:

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime erbjuder ett gediget smartphone-paket för användare som lägger stor vikt vid en bra framåtriktad kamera. I dom flesta prestandatester överträffar denna Xiaomi-telefon enheter från samma prisskikt när det kommer till systemprestanda; det är bara grafiskt krävande applikationer som körs aningen långsammare på Redmi-telefonen.

Intresserade köpare får en smartphone med bra batteritid, en skärm på 5.5 tum och en hyfsad kamera. Redmi Note 5A Prime är mer än tillräckligt kapabel att hantera enstaka foton, enklare applikationer och mindre krävande spel.

Xiaomis Redmi Note 5A Prime är en bra smartphone för den genomsnittlige användaren och briljerar med ett bra förhållande mellan pris och prestanda.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime - 07/15/2018 v6(old)
Mike Wobker

Design
74%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
79%
Anslutningar
41 / 60 → 68%
Vikt
92%
Batteri
93%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
21 / 63 → 33%
Programprestanda
29 / 70 → 41%
Temperatur
89%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
88 / 91 → 97%
Camera
75%
Medel
72%
81%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A Prime Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Mike Wobker, 2018-07-24 (Update: 2018-07-24)