Notebookcheck

Test: Schenker XMG Fusion 15 - Intels referensdesign utmanar konkurrenterna (Sammanfattning)

Intel och Schenker har skapat en tunn spellaptop med bra batteritid, massor av prestanda och ett portutbud på entusiastnivå. Kommer den sopa banan med konkurrerande alternativ från Razer, Acer, Gigabyte och Asus?
Sebastian Jentsch, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Andrea Grüblinger (översatt av Daniel Eriksson),
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19 (XMG Fusion 15 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-9750H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Kärna: 885 MHz, Minne: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, Forceware 430.81, Optimus Intel UHD 630
Minne
16384 MB 
, Corsair PC4-21300
Skärm
15.6 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, BOE NV156FHM-N4G, IPS, 144Hz, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Hårddisk
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, 500 GB 
, Raid 0 och 1
Ljudkort
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Anslutningar
2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Mikrofon, line-ut, Kortläsare: SD/SDHC/SDXC
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 20 x 356.4 x 233.7
Batteri
93 Wh, 8000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD-webbkamera, Kompatibel med Windows Hello
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix 1280x720
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Optomekaniskt tangentbord med tangentspecifik RGB-belysning, Tysta brytare, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Nätadapter på 230 watt, Control Center, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
1.89 kg, Strömförsörjning: 830 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15

Storleksjämförelse

360 mm 252 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg356.4 mm 233.7 mm 20 mm 1.9 kg356 mm 250 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.1 kg
Baksidan: RJ-45 (LAN), Thunderbolt 3/USB Typ C 3.1 Gen 2 (stöd för DisplayPort & G-Sync, ej Power Delivery, HDMI 2.0 HDCP 2.2)
Baksidan: RJ-45 (LAN), Thunderbolt 3/USB Typ C 3.1 Gen 2 (stöd för DisplayPort & G-Sync, ej Power Delivery, HDMI 2.0 HDCP 2.2)
Höger: USB Typ A 3.1 Gen 2, Hörlursanslutning, Mikrofonanslutning
Höger: USB Typ A 3.1 Gen 2, Hörlursanslutning, Mikrofonanslutning
Vänster: 2x USB Typ A 3.1 Gen 1, Kortläsare
Vänster: 2x USB Typ A 3.1 Gen 1, Kortläsare
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
197 MB/s ∼100% +154%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
181 MB/s ∼92% +133%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 212, n=274)
92.5 MB/s ∼47% +19%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77.6 MB/s ∼39%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s ∼100% +180%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198.2 MB/s ∼82% +129%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=272)
110 MB/s ∼45% +27%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86.4 MB/s ∼36%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
696 MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
694 MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s ∼98% +13%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼98% +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1620, n=307)
657 MBit/s ∼94% +9%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
603 (min: 531, max: 676) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼100% +12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼99% +11%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s ∼96% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1645, n=307)
612 MBit/s ∼90% 0%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
611 (min: 491, max: 652) MBit/s ∼89%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
554 MBit/s ∼81% -9%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø603 (531-676)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø614 (541-652)
325
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
BOE NV156FHM-N4G
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 331 cd/m² Medel: 309.4 cd/m² Minimum: 11.4 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 331 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1034:1 (Svärta: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9, calibrated: 1.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
BOE NV156FHM-N4G, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NV156FHM-N4K (BOE082A), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
6%
6%
-57%
-70%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8 (4, 4)
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
10%
5.2 (2.6, 2.6)
35%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
-90%
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
-110%
Response Time Black / White *
9 (5, 4)
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
2%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
-24%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
-24%
11.6 (7.2, 4.4)
-29%
PWM Frequency
23580 (24)
Screen
6%
12%
9%
8%
Brightness middle
331
286
-14%
288
-13%
266
-20%
314.7
-5%
Brightness
309
275
-11%
265
-14%
248
-20%
312
1%
Brightness Distribution
85
90
6%
84
-1%
89
5%
90
6%
Black Level *
0.32
0.37
-16%
0.22
31%
0.31
3%
0.38
-19%
Contrast
1034
773
-25%
1309
27%
858
-17%
828
-20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
2.19
51%
3.22
28%
2.78
38%
2.56
43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8
4.4
45%
6.26
22%
5.96
25%
4.89
39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.9
2.27
-19%
1.5
21%
0.91
52%
1.71
10%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.7
2.2
53%
3.43
27%
3.58
24%
3.4
28%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.41 91%
2.41 91%
2.46 89%
2.3 96%
CCT
7537 86%
6405 101%
7290 89%
7186 90%
6435 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
59
0%
60
2%
62
5%
60.7
3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
91
0%
93
2%
96
5%
94.6
4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
6% / 6%
9% / 11%
-24% / -1%
-31% / -4%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN Gråskala - Innan kalibrering
CalMAN Gråskala - Innan kalibrering
CalMAN Mättnads-svep - Innan kalibrering
CalMAN Mättnads-svep - Innan kalibrering
CalMAN Color Checker - Innan kalibrering
CalMAN Color Checker - Innan kalibrering
CalMAN Gråskala - Efter kalibrering
CalMAN Gråskala - Efter kalibrering
CalMAN Mättnads-svep - Efter kalibrering
CalMAN Mättnads-svep - Efter kalibrering
CalMAN Color Checker - Efter kalibrering
CalMAN Color Checker - Efter kalibrering

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18284 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

System-info: CPU-Z CPU
System-info: CPU-Z cache
System-info: CPU-Z Moderkort
System-info: CPU-Z Minne
System-info: CPU-Z SPD
System-info: CPU-Z Grafik
System-info: GPU-Z
System-info: GPU-Z Intel UHD Graphics
System-info: HWiNFO
System-info: Intel XTU
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300Tooltip
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1225 (1188.53-1294.79)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1066 (1053.71-1188.07)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1007 (976.09-1115.02)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø922 (913.2-999)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
189 Points ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H
183 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=79)
183 Points ∼97% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
177 Points ∼94% -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points ∼93% -4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 215, n=563)
159 Points ∼84% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H
1294 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
1188 Points ∼92% -8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1182 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (932 - 1306, n=82)
1171 Points ∼90% -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1115 Points ∼86% -14%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
999 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=567)
870 Points ∼67% -33%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1294 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
183 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
114.77 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Hjälp
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
7357 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
7314 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (4938 - 8220, n=10)
7064 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
6936 Points ∼94% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
6888 Points ∼94% -6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6708 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1764 - 11245, n=253)
6462 Points ∼88% -12%
Productivity
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
7695 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
7661 Points ∼100% +2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7547 Points ∼98% +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
7515 Points ∼98% 0%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
7490 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (6834 - 7754, n=10)
7388 Points ∼96% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (4175 - 9077, n=254)
7242 Points ∼94% -3%
Essentials
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
9534 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
9472 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (9140 - 9741, n=10)
9401 Points ∼99% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
9366 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
9231 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (4892 - 11266, n=255)
8664 Points ∼91% -9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8517 Points ∼89% -11%
Score
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5784 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5746 Points ∼99% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5697 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
5654 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (5115 - 5991, n=10)
5637 Points ∼97% -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=257)
5291 Points ∼91% -9%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
6035 Points ∼100% +6%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5694 Points ∼94%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5607 Points ∼93% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (4520 - 6035, n=7)
5523 Points ∼92% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6593, n=421)
5073 Points ∼84% -11%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
4890 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
4851 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (3638 - 5661, n=7)
4692 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=438)
4274 Points ∼87% -13%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4150 Points ∼85% -15%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4890 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5931 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5694 poäng
Hjälp
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
7%
15%
14%
-8%
21%
Write 4K
106.47
97.04
-9%
108.8
2%
115.5
8%
93.88
-12%
145 (99.3 - 197, n=13)
36%
Read 4K
42.24
49.58
17%
40.31
-5%
57.97
37%
40.56
-4%
47 (38.5 - 53.2, n=13)
11%
Write Seq
1465.81
1838
25%
2488
70%
1555
6%
1468
0%
1832 (1087 - 2900, n=13)
25%
Read Seq
1336.59
2421
81%
1916
43%
2590
94%
1540
15%
1815 (974 - 2929, n=13)
36%
Write 4K Q32T1
337.26
326.9
-3%
382.4
13%
369.3
10%
293.5
-13%
409 (311 - 557, n=13)
21%
Read 4K Q32T1
407.59
372.9
-9%
421.8
3%
441.7
8%
346
-15%
486 (351 - 648, n=13)
19%
Write Seq Q32T1
2932.8
1894
-35%
2542
-13%
1547
-47%
1941
-34%
3232 (2933 - 3280, n=13)
10%
Read Seq Q32T1
3235.3
2828
-13%
3320
3%
2969
-8%
3266
1%
3479 (3235 - 3565, n=13)
8%
AS SSD
-28%
-2%
-23%
-7%
4%
Copy Game MB/s
1216.28
1140.57
-6%
1200.14
-1%
1099 (787 - 1434, n=6)
-10%
Copy Program MB/s
511.09
454.24
-11%
525.53
3%
438 (243 - 570, n=6)
-14%
Copy ISO MB/s
1997.6
2085.95
4%
1974.98
-1%
1939 (1394 - 2728, n=6)
-3%
Score Total
4886
2896
-41%
4329
-11%
2870
-41%
4079
-17%
5051 (4379 - 5862, n=12)
3%
Score Write
2694
1528
-43%
1927
-28%
1141
-58%
2010
-25%
2534 (1902 - 2859, n=12)
-6%
Score Read
1454
923
-37%
1604
10%
1186
-18%
1362
-6%
1663 (1414 - 2359, n=12)
14%
Access Time Write *
0.031
0.04
-29%
0.065
-110%
0.033
-6%
0.0292 (0.023 - 0.037, n=12)
6%
Access Time Read *
0.063
0.08
-27%
0.042
33%
0.047
25%
0.0498 (0.033 - 0.092, n=12)
21%
4K-64 Write
2358.62
1253
-47%
1546.17
-34%
921.88
-61%
1717.43
-27%
2155 (1494 - 2444, n=12)
-9%
4K-64 Read
1159.12
623.93
-46%
1272.09
10%
875.61
-24%
1125.76
-3%
1355 (1156 - 2050, n=12)
17%
4K Write
117.18
103.6
-12%
143.57
23%
126.51
8%
110.72
-6%
132 (99.1 - 166, n=12)
13%
4K Read
50.57
48.32
-4%
42.95
-15%
59.11
17%
52.31
3%
52.9 (30 - 62.3, n=12)
5%
Seq Write
2178.95
1711.53
-21%
2374.01
9%
923.81
-58%
1822.26
-16%
2470 (2081 - 2779, n=12)
13%
Seq Read
2438.1
2505.83
3%
2888.39
18%
2516.94
3%
1839.67
-25%
2547 (2172 - 2975, n=12)
4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-11% / -13%
7% / 6%
-5% / -10%
-8% / -7%
13% / 10%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3235.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2932.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 407.59 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 337.26 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1336.59 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1465.81 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 42.24 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 106.47 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
25259 Points ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
24267 Points ∼96% -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
22749 Points ∼90% -10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
22723 Points ∼90% -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
22005 Points ∼87% -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (13457 - 25259, n=23)
21355 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=666)
14092 Points ∼56% -44%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
20201 Points ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
19123 Points ∼95% -5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
18153 Points ∼90% -10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
18060 Points ∼89% -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
17335 Points ∼86% -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (11022 - 20201, n=24)
16818 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=589)
11830 Points ∼59% -41%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
125189 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
114431 Points ∼91% -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
112480 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
109473 Points ∼87% -13%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
106170 Points ∼85% -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (10944 - 125189, n=22)
85962 Points ∼69% -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=569)
69664 Points ∼56% -44%
3DMark 11 Performance
20181 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
39529 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17593 poäng
Hjälp
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
70.2 (min: 58) fps ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
68.9 fps ∼98% +4%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
66 fps ∼94%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
64.4 (min: 54) fps ∼92% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (57 - 80.8, n=23)
64.4 fps ∼92% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
64.1 fps ∼91% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=356)
51.6 fps ∼74% -22%
F1 2019 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
105 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (97 - 112, n=5)
104 fps ∼99% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
103 (min: 92) fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (10.8 - 152, n=31)
93.1 fps ∼89% -11%
Dirt Rally 2.0 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
79.1 (min: 64) fps ∼100% +2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
77.4 fps ∼98%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
75 (min: 53) fps ∼95% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (68.8 - 79.1, n=4)
74.4 fps ∼94% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 114, n=30)
70 fps ∼88% -10%
Anthem - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
79 (min: 64) fps ∼100% +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
75.7 (min: 49) fps ∼96% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (67.8 - 75.7, n=4)
71.9 fps ∼91% +2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
70.6 fps ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
  (24 - 112, n=21)
66.2 fps ∼84% -6%
Farming Simulator 19 - 1920x1080 Very High Preset
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
128.1 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (106 - 128, n=2)
117 fps ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.6 - 140, n=11)
75.1 fps ∼59% -41%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (57 - 85, n=9)
77.7 fps ∼100% +8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
74.2 fps ∼95% +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (23 - 124, n=76)
73.1 fps ∼94% +2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
72 fps ∼93%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
70.2 (min: 58) fps ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
68.9 fps ∼98% +4%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
66 fps ∼94%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
64.4 (min: 54) fps ∼92% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (57 - 80.8, n=23)
64.4 fps ∼92% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
64.1 fps ∼91% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=356)
51.6 fps ∼74% -22%
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB; The Witcher 3: Ø66 (59-73)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8; The Witcher 3: Ø51.3 (44-61)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; The Witcher 3: Ø62.2 (57-70)
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0); The Witcher 3: Ø76.1 (70-81)
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; The Witcher 3: Ø49.5 (46-53)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; The Witcher 3: Ø50.3 (45-54)
låg med. hög ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 66 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 77 72 fps
Farming Simulator 19 (2018) 128.1 fps
Anthem (2019) 70.6 fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 77.4 fps
F1 2019 (2019) 105 fps
Fläkten är avstängd helt och hållet i det tysta läget
Fläkten är avstängd helt och hållet i det tysta läget

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
30 / 30 / 30 dB(A)
Hög belastning
46 / 51.6 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Emissions
Fan Noise
51.6
Noise
-9%
-5%
-8%
9%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.8
4%
Idle Minimum *
30
31
-3%
30
-0%
31
-3%
28.8
4%
Idle Average *
30
33
-10%
33
-10%
34
-13%
28.8
4%
Idle Maximum *
30
38
-27%
39
-30%
39
-30%
29.4
2%
Load Average *
46
50
-9%
45
2%
46
-0%
35.7
22%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51.5
53
-3%
49
5%
53
-3%
42.5
17%
Load Maximum *
51.6
56
-9%
51
1%
55
-7%
45
13%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-9% / -9%
-5% / -5%
-8% / -8%
9% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

 46 °C52.7 °C43.2 °C 
 27.6 °C45.3 °C28.6 °C 
 32.1 °C36.1 °C35.9 °C 
Max: 52.7 °C
Medel: 38.6 °C
41.6 °C50 °C44.1 °C
35.7 °C52.2 °C35.1 °C
33 °C36.1 °C33.3 °C
Max: 52.2 °C
Medel: 40.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  26.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 23.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.7 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 39.7 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.2 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 42.4 °C / 108 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.1 °C / 98.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-8.3 °C / -15 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.73132.72533.530.333.53138.231.638.24030.329.930.35034.831.234.86330.626.730.68025.326.625.31002624.72612528.123.828.116034.323.834.32003422.33425041.120.741.131548.320.148.340054.819.754.850056.619.256.663057.61957.680067.118.367.1100064.617.864.6125060.617.960.6160052.617.452.6200055.317.355.3250053.917.353.9315058.717.158.7400050.117.450.1500048.817.348.863005517.555800056.317.456.31000050.717.550.71250045.217.345.21600045.217.545.2SPL70.93070.9N25.71.325.7median 52.6median 17.8median 52.6Delta6.31.66.343.644.939.640.430.933.83542.828.335.92635.828.642.128.757.423.854.622.957.423.958.52560.92064.219.16417.965.117.372.516.97517.177.818.576.717.874.917.474.117.467.717.676.817.583.317.484.217.279.817.271.617.266.51769.216.863.43090.21.481.4median 17.5median 69.21.86hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSchenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.7 / 1.6 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 7.5 / 14.6 / 17 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 181 / 243 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IGZO, 1920x1080, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-61%
15%
-43%
8%
-29%
-47%
Idle Minimum *
7.5
24
-220%
7
7%
21
-180%
10.4
-39%
15.7 (5 - 46, n=20)
-109%
19.3 (1.9 - 113, n=743)
-157%
Idle Average *
14.6
27
-85%
12
18%
23
-58%
14.6
-0%
20.6 (12 - 59, n=20)
-41%
24.7 (6.6 - 119, n=743)
-69%
Idle Maximum *
17
33
-94%
22
-29%
32
-88%
16.3
4%
27 (16.3 - 65.5, n=20)
-59%
30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=743)
-78%
Load Average *
181
129
29%
86
52%
97
46%
88.5
51%
103 (83.4 - 181, n=20)
43%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=733)
43%
Load Maximum *
243
216
11%
177
27%
213
12%
182.4
25%
194 (120 - 243, n=20)
20%
174 (21.9 - 590, n=732)
28%
Witcher 3 ultra *
170
176
-4%
144
15%
148
13%
155.4
9%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
9tim 19min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6tim 00min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 28min
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 93 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 76 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q,  Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-35%
20%
40%
10%
34%
-32%
-5%
-25%
Reader / Idle
559
353
-37%
666
19%
545
-3%
682
22%
549
-2%
335
-40%
507
-9%
351 (39 - 1174, n=697)
-37%
WiFi v1.3
360
220
-39%
478
33%
421
17%
387
8%
382
6%
190
-47%
362
1%
261 (62 - 622, n=407)
-27%
Load
88
62
-30%
96
9%
181
106%
88
0%
174
98%
81
-8%
81
-8%
79.2 (18 - 202, n=664)
-10%
H.264
408
364
356
256 (88 - 508, n=151)

För

+ Turbo Boost är nästan alltid aktiv
+ bra spelprestanda
+ tangentbordet har bra återkoppling
+ responsiv 144 Hz-skärm
+ bra batteritid
+ många portar inklusive Thunderbolt och USB 3.1 Gen 2
+ snabbt WiFi från senaste generationen
+ riktigt bra mikrofon
+ lätt i förhållande till sin prestandaklass
+ lätt att underhålla, fläkten går att rengöra

Emot

- låter riktigt mycket vid belastning/spel
- täcker inte sRGB helt
- dålig webbkamera
Schenker Fusion 15: Spellaptop med en blygsam ultrabook-liknande design
Schenker Fusion 15: Spellaptop med en blygsam ultrabook-liknande design

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Den tekniska sidan har fått stor nytta av samarbetet mellan Intel och Schenker: Fusion 15 har mer prestanda än andra konkurrerande tunna spellaptops trots att de är utrustade med samma hårdvara. Det är i huvudsak processorn som drar nytta av detta, men skillnaden i spel är minimal. Detta speglar inte bara kyllösningen positivt utan säger också något om balansen mellan chippen och GPU:ns energibegränsningar.

Vår konfiguration av Fusion 15 (RTX 2070) kombinerar mobilitet och prestanda, som ofta står mot varandra, på ett sätt få andra enheter lyckas med.

Å andra sidan har den tunna 15-tumsdatorn förvånansvärt bra batteritid: Vi uppmätte en batteritid på sex till straxt över nio timmar i vårt WiFi-test respektive vid tomgång. Även om det finns andra enheter som kan matcha de siffrorna (Acer Predator Triton 500) kan de inte få ut samma prestanda ur komponenterna när datorn är ansluten till elnätet.

Höljet av aluminium/magnesium-legering väger hela 200 gram mindre än motsvarigheten i rent aluminium. Trots detta håller det blygsamma, matta och lätthanterliga höljet hög kvalitet.

Schenker kompromissar heller inte när det kommer till anslutbarhet, underhåll och möjlighet till uppgraderingar. En Thunderbolt-anslutning med stöd för DisplayPort och två M.2 2280-platser är båda imponerande.

Bristerna rör i huvudsak att den låter mycket vid belastning eller när man spelar spel. För kreativt arbete kan avsaknaden av fullständig sRGB-täckning och lågt kontrastförhållande också vara ett problem. Å andra sidan kommer inte gamers påverkas lika mycket av detta och kan istället uppskatta 144 Hz och korta responstider. Detta kompenserar nästan för det undermåliga kontrastförhållandet.

Om du letar efter ännu mer prestanda kanske inte tunn-och-lätt kategorin är för dig. Schenker och Intel har skapat en riktigt bra mix av mobilitet och prestanda.

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19 - 10/17/2019 v7
Sebastian Jentsch

Design
82 / 98 → 84%
Tangentbord
97%
Mus
96%
Anslutningar
60 / 80 → 75%
Vikt
64 / 10-66 → 97%
Batteri
69 / 95 → 72%
Skärm
84%
Spelprestanda
93%
Programprestanda
90%
Temperatur
80 / 95 → 84%
Ljudnivå
78 / 90 → 86%
Audio
46%
Camera
30 / 85 → 35%
Medel
75%
84%
Gaming - Vägt medel
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Schenker XMG Fusion 15 - Intels referensdesign utmanar konkurrenterna (Sammanfattning)
Sebastian Jentsch, 2019-10-14 (Update: 2019-10-14)