Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Acer Predator Triton 500 (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 304 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1126:1 (Svärta: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.66 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.72
ΔE Greyscale 5.53 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.5
| Acer Predator Triton 500 AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 2% | 1% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.2 | 63.5 -1% | 65.3 2% | 66.2 3% | 66.7 4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 92.6 | 93.1 1% | 94.9 2% | 92.1 -1% | 91.2 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.7 | 64.5 -2% | 66.3 1% | 67.2 2% | 66.7 2% |
| Response Times | -63% | -57% | -67% | 9% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 8 ? | 16.4 ? -105% | 16.8 ? -110% | 17.6 ? -120% | 7.4 ? 7% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11.2 ? | 13.6 ? -21% | 11.6 ? -4% | 12.8 ? -14% | 10 ? 11% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | 15% | 7% | 14% | 11% | |
| Brightness middle | 304 | 250 -18% | 314.7 4% | 254 -16% | 294 -3% |
| Brightness | 299 | 235 -21% | 312 4% | 262 -12% | 275 -8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 85 -4% | 90 1% | 89 0% | 84 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.29 -7% | 0.38 -41% | 0.22 19% | 0.24 11% |
| Contrast | 1126 | 862 -23% | 828 -26% | 1155 3% | 1225 9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.66 | 1.46 69% | 2.56 45% | 2.37 49% | 2.57 45% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.65 | 2.47 74% | 4.89 49% | 4.71 51% | 4.88 49% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.72 | 1.71 1% | 1.84 -7% | 2.14 -24% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.53 | 1.27 77% | 3.4 39% | 1.58 71% | 2.41 56% |
| Gamma | 2.5 88% | 2.4 92% | 2.3 96% | 2.48 89% | 2.5 88% |
| CCT | 8028 81% | 6749 96% | 6435 101% | 6785 96% | 6370 102% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 60 0% | 60.7 1% | 60 0% | 59 -2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 93 0% | 94.6 2% | 92 -1% | 91 -2% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -16% /
1% | -16% /
-2% | -17% /
2% | 7% /
9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| Acer Predator Triton 500 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0) | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -16% | 1% | -3% | -21% | |
| Score Total | 3770 | 2722 -28% | 4079 8% | 4122 9% | 3294 -13% |
| Seq Write | 2492 | 1471 -41% | 1822 -27% | 1834 -26% | 1261 -49% |
| Seq Read | 2913 | 2113 -27% | 1840 -37% | 1266 -57% | 903 -69% |
| 4K Write | 107.2 | 107.1 0% | 110.7 3% | 107.2 0% | 103.6 -3% |
| 4K Read | 38.7 | 55 42% | 52.3 35% | 48.94 26% | 40.02 3% |
| Score Write | 1435 | 957 -33% | 2010 40% | 2051 43% | 1515 6% |
| Score Read | 1558 | 1180 -24% | 1362 -13% | 1346 -14% | 1161 -25% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 20149 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (17.5 - 449, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=227, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 136 | 76.5 | ||
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 134 | 129 | ||
| Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 65 | 62 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 30 / 32 / 34 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 44 / 47 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | 9% | 2% | -9% | 7% | |
| off / environment * | 29 | 30 -3% | 28.8 1% | 30 -3% | 29 -0% | 24.1 ? 17% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30 | 32 -7% | 28.8 4% | 30 -0% | 33 -10% | 25.6 ? 15% |
| Idle Average * | 32 | 34 -6% | 28.8 10% | 31 3% | 34 -6% | 27.4 ? 14% |
| Idle Maximum * | 34 | 36 -6% | 29.4 14% | 34 -0% | 40 -18% | 30.7 ? 10% |
| Load Average * | 44 | 42 5% | 35.7 19% | 43 2% | 47 -7% | 43.1 ? 2% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 46 | 44 4% | 42.5 8% | 42 9% | 51 -11% | |
| Load Maximum * | 47 | 48 -2% | 45 4% | 44 6% | 53 -13% | 53.4 ? -14% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.1 °C / -18.2 F).
| Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 2% | 14% | 11% | 1% | 7% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 49 | 56 -14% | 49 -0% | 49 -0% | 54 -10% | 46 ? 6% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 58 | 66 -14% | 49 16% | 63 -9% | 60 -3% | 49.5 ? 15% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 33 | 27 18% | 25.4 23% | 24 27% | 30 9% | 31.4 ? 5% |
| Idle Bottom * | 33 | 27 18% | 27.2 18% | 25 24% | 30 9% | 32.5 ? 2% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Predator Triton 500 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Predator Triton 700 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.3 / 1.7 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 16 / 22 / 32 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
89 / 173 Watt |
   
| |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | 18% | 23% | -7% | -5% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 16 | 16 -0% | 10.4 35% | 7 56% | 17 -6% | 13.8 ? 14% |
| Idle Average * | 22 | 18 18% | 14.6 34% | 11 50% | 20 9% | 19.2 ? 13% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32 | 23 28% | 16.3 49% | 20 37% | 29 9% | 27 ? 16% |
| Load Average * | 89 | 88 1% | 88.5 1% | 98 -10% | 112 -26% | 111.3 ? -25% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 147 | 120 18% | 155.4 -6% | 132 10% | 152 -3% | |
| Load Maximum * | 173 | 167 3% | 182.4 -5% | 182 -5% | 211 -22% | 251 ? -45% |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 82 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 80 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 82 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 50 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 93% | 72% | 47% | -34% | 53% | |
| Reader / Idle | 335 | 549 64% | 682 104% | 507 51% | 213 -36% | 542 ? 62% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 190 | 382 101% | 387 104% | 362 91% | 157 -17% | 368 ? 94% |
| Load | 81 | 174 115% | 88 9% | 81 0% | 42 -48% | 84.1 ? 4% |
| H.264 | 364 | 356 | 397 ? |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Acer Predator Triton 500 missar precis omdömet "riktigt bra". Denna laptop på 15 tum uppfyller nästan alla kriterier som utmärker en modern spellaptop. Utöver en skärm med smal infattning och ett tunt hölje bör vi också nämna 144 Hz-skärmen som får poäng för sitt G-Sync stöd.
Triton 500 saknar heller inte prestanda. Versionen vi testade med Core i7-8750H och GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q kan hantera alla moderna spel i Full HD-upplösning utan problem.
Men det är obegripligt att Acer inte använder grafikbyte. I fråga om mobilitet hade Optimus verkligen varit en fördel. Vi kan se ytterligare brister i fråga om servicemöjligheter. Insidan är designad på ett sådant sätt att användaren knappt kan komma åt några komponenter alls (nyckelord: lagringslösningen och RAM-minnet).
Trots det är Triton 500 i vårt tycke betydligt mer framgångsrik än den äldre modellen Triton 700.
Acer Predator Triton 500
-
02/14/2019 v6(old)
Florian Glaser
Pricecompare
