Notebookcheck

Test: Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Core i7-8750H, RTX 2070 Max-Q) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 02/28/2019

Karisma. Den tunna och kompakta Aero 15-X9 efterföljer den populära Aero 15X v8 som vi recenserade förra året. Denna nya spellaptop på 15.6 tum hanterar moderna AAA-spel smidigt på sin 144 Hz 1080p-skärm tack vare en Core i7-8750H processor, en RTX 2070 Max-Q GPU och 16 GB DDR4-2666 RAM. En NVMe SSD hjälper också till med att säkra gedigen systemprestanda samtidigt som en Thunderbolt 3-port ger dig möjligheten att ansluta en extern GPU om du skulle vilja använda ett desktop-grafikkort. Läs vidare för att få reda på hur den presterar i våra tester och huruvida den kan sätta en ny standard för tunna och lätta spellaptops.

Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Aero 15 Serie)
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Kärna: 885 MHz, Minne: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 256 bitars anslutning, ForceWare 417.71, Optimus
Minne
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2666, enkel kanal, två SODIMM-platser; en upptagen, maximalt 64 GB RAM
Skärm
15.6 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, LGD05C0, IPS, Full HD, X-Rite Pantone, 144 Hz, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel HM370
Hårddisk
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8, 1024 GB 
, NVMe. 2x M.2 Typ 2280; en plats upptagen
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Cannon Point-LP PCH - cAVS (Audio, Video, Speech)
Anslutningar
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm kombinerad anslutning för hörlurar och mikrofon, Kortläsare: SD/SDHC/SDXC, TPM 2.0
Nätverk
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 18.9 x 356 x 250
Batteri
94.24 Wh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2x 2 W stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Laddare på 230 W, XSplit Gamecaster, XSplit Broadcaster, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.12 kg
Pris
2800 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg358 mm 248 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg360 mm 268 mm 15.8 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.1 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
200 MB/s ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
191 MB/s ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=237)
92.3 MB/s ∼46% -54%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=235)
110 MB/s ∼45% -55%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
682 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼99%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
671 MBit/s ∼98% -1%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
660 MBit/s ∼96% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=247)
604 MBit/s ∼88% -11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
693 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s ∼99% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s ∼98%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s ∼96% -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s ∼95% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 730, n=247)
557 MBit/s ∼80% -18%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
379 MBit/s ∼55% -44%
247
cd/m²
239
cd/m²
248
cd/m²
238
cd/m²
250
cd/m²
241
cd/m²
221
cd/m²
213
cd/m²
218
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
LGD05C0
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 250 cd/m² Medel: 235 cd/m² Minimum: 7 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 250 cd/m²
Kontrast: 862:1 (Svärta: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.46 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.27 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
93% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.4
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Predator Triton 500
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
8%
41%
-1%
7%
35%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16.4 (8.8, 7.6)
16.8 (8.4, 8.4)
-2%
7.4 (3.8, 3.6)
55%
17.6 (9.2, 8.4)
-7%
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
-2%
8 (4, 4)
51%
Response Time Black / White *
13.6 (8.4, 5.2)
11.2 (6, 5.2)
18%
10 (4.4, 5.6)
26%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
6%
11.6 (7.2, 4.4)
15%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
18%
PWM Frequency
Screen
12%
-18%
-10%
-31%
-75%
Brightness middle
250
313
25%
294
18%
254
2%
314.7
26%
304
22%
Brightness
235
300
28%
275
17%
262
11%
312
33%
299
27%
Brightness Distribution
85
78
-8%
84
-1%
89
5%
90
6%
89
5%
Black Level *
0.29
0.33
-14%
0.24
17%
0.22
24%
0.38
-31%
0.27
7%
Contrast
862
948
10%
1225
42%
1155
34%
828
-4%
1126
31%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.46
1.29
12%
2.57
-76%
2.37
-62%
2.56
-75%
4.66
-219%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.47
2.04
17%
4.88
-98%
4.71
-91%
4.89
-98%
9.65
-291%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.27
0.69
46%
2.41
-90%
1.58
-24%
3.4
-168%
5.53
-335%
Gamma
2.4 92%
2.43 91%
2.5 88%
2.48 89%
2.3 96%
2.5 88%
CCT
6749 96%
6550 99%
6370 102%
6785 96%
6435 101%
8028 81%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
60
0%
59
-2%
60
0%
60.7
1%
60
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
94
1%
91
-2%
92
-1%
94.6
2%
93
0%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.14
1.84
1.71
1.72
Total Average (Program / Settings)
10% / 11%
12% / -8%
-6% / -9%
-12% / -25%
-20% / -57%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
13.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.8 ms rise
↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9457 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWinfo
Intel XTU
 
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1095 (1087.31-1156.25)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1110 (1041.91-1133.72)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1004 (937.73-1119.73)
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø981 (927.26-1023.23)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø922 (913.2-999)
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø980 (961.82-1019.05)
CPU-klockfrekvenser under en loop av CB15 R15 Multi 64-bit
CPU-klockfrekvenser under en loop av CB15 R15 Multi 64-bit
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6351
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
33923
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
7870
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
166 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1156 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
91.06 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Hjälp
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points ∼100% +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼99% +5%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼99% +5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼99% +5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼94% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼94%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 212, n=494)
155 Points ∼88% -7%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1156 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1133 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
1120 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
1053 Points ∼91% -9%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1019 Points ∼88% -12%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
999 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=497)
812 Points ∼70% -30%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
6351 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.85 - 8872, n=423)
4827 Points ∼76% -24%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
33923 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.7 - 48808, n=423)
18221 Points ∼54% -46%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
21358 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (9307 - 27774, n=74)
16189 Points ∼76% -24%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
3741 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (2926 - 4825, n=74)
3704 Points ∼99% -1%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
17795 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (8085 - 26471, n=29)
15155 Points ∼85% -15%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
4692 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (3387 - 5744, n=29)
4476 Points ∼95% -5%
Geekbench 4.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (4116 - 32070, n=52)
18935 Points ∼100% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
18716 Points ∼99%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
4810 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (2131 - 6030, n=52)
4797 Points ∼100% 0%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (753 - 7545, n=179)
1215 ms * ∼100% -7%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
1138.1 ms * ∼94%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
1125.7 ms * ∼93% +1%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
33659 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (12288 - 49518, n=175)
33288 Points ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
30594 Points ∼91% -9%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
255.92 Points ∼100% +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (51.6 - 333, n=178)
249 Points ∼97% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
245.41 Points ∼96%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score
6400 poäng
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4338 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5111 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5645 poäng
Hjälp
PCMark 10 - Score
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
5883 Points ∼100% +10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points ∼92% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5353 Points ∼91%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=189)
5182 Points ∼88% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5170 Points ∼88% -3%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5095 Points ∼87% -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5059 Points ∼86% -5%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5706 Points ∼100% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5676 Points ∼99% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5645 Points ∼99%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5621 Points ∼99% 0%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5607 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=374)
5021 Points ∼88% -11%
Home Score Accelerated v2
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4665 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4620 Points ∼99% +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4504 Points ∼97% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
4338 Points ∼93%
Average of class Gaming
  (3638 - 6093, n=392)
4245 Points ∼91% -2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4150 Points ∼89% -4%
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
Sequential Read: 1975 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1428 MB/s
512K Read: 1092 MB/s
512K Write: 1305 MB/s
4K Read: 60.58 MB/s
4K Write: 126.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 566.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 435.5 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Acer Predator Triton 500
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-10%
-14%
1%
3%
23%
Write 4K
97.13
94.43
-3%
98.17
1%
95.3
-2%
93.88
-3%
93.6
-4%
Read 4K
53.66
37.65
-30%
39.43
-27%
40.13
-25%
40.56
-24%
38.82
-28%
Write Seq
1526
1335
-13%
1386
-9%
1883
23%
1468
-4%
2455
61%
Read Seq
2020
1404
-30%
1100
-46%
1322
-35%
1540
-24%
2107
4%
Write 4K Q32T1
285.6
268.6
-6%
270.3
-5%
309.9
9%
293.5
3%
298.7
5%
Read 4K Q32T1
321.8
332.8
3%
340.3
6%
353.7
10%
346
8%
338.7
5%
Write Seq Q32T1
1533
1375
-10%
1454
-5%
1919
25%
1941
27%
2902
89%
Read Seq Q32T1
2351
2627
12%
1681
-28%
2466
5%
3266
39%
3536
50%
3DMark 06 Standard
34534 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
16608 poäng
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
80496 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
31838 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15587 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
6400 poäng
Hjälp
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (1294 - 5942, n=44)
3888 Points ∼100% +9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3679 Points ∼95% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3557 Points ∼91%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6728 Points ∼100% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6562 Points ∼98%
Average of class Gaming
  (7775 - 13013, n=136)
5568 Points ∼83% -15%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18153 Points ∼100% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17598 Points ∼97%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
15156 Points ∼83% -14%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
14780 Points ∼81% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=519)
11159 Points ∼61% -37%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator Triton 500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28083 Points ∼100% +27%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22723 Points ∼81% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22089 Points ∼79%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
19162 Points ∼68% -13%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18687 Points ∼67% -15%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18296 Points ∼65% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=594)
13117 Points ∼47% -41%
låg med. hög ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 233.9217.9202.6127.7fps
GTA V (2015) 133.1123.192.954.2fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 177.7144.986.558.3fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 60.253.152.6fps
Destiny 2 (2017) 110.995.996.996.1fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 84.670.261.6fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 94737067fps
Darksiders III (2018) 102.268.265.364.9fps
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
76.5 (min: 63) fps ∼100% +31%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
68.9 fps ∼90% +18%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
58.3 (min: 48) fps ∼76%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
52.7 fps ∼69% -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
52.4 fps ∼68% -10%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
49.2 fps ∼64% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=288)
48.8 fps ∼64% -16%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
152.5 fps ∼100% +19%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
127.7 fps ∼84%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.7 - 266, n=328)
96.2 fps ∼63% -25%
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8; The Witcher 3: Ø51.3 (44-61)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; The Witcher 3: Ø62.2 (57-70)
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0); The Witcher 3: Ø76.1 (70-81)

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
32 / 34 / 36 dB(A)
Hög belastning
42 / 48 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-4%
-7%
5%
10%
2%
3%
off / environment *
30
29
3%
29
3%
30
-0%
28.8
4%
29
3%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=293)
2%
Idle Minimum *
32
30
6%
33
-3%
30
6%
28.8
10%
30
6%
31.4 (28 - 41.7, n=716)
2%
Idle Average *
34
31
9%
34
-0%
31
9%
28.8
15%
32
6%
32.7 (28 - 46.6, n=716)
4%
Idle Maximum *
36
35
3%
40
-11%
34
6%
29.4
18%
34
6%
34.7 (28 - 51, n=716)
4%
Load Average *
42
49
-17%
47
-12%
43
-2%
35.7
15%
44
-5%
40.6 (30.3 - 58, n=717)
3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
44
51
-16%
51
-16%
42
5%
42.5
3%
46
-5%
Load Maximum *
48
54
-13%
53
-10%
44
8%
45
6%
47
2%
47.9 (38.9 - 64.1, n=717)
-0%

* ... smaller is better

 48 °C56 °C56 °C 
 39 °C45 °C40 °C 
 35 °C38 °C37 °C 
Max: 56 °C
Medel: 43.8 °C
64 °C66 °C59 °C
58 °C58 °C44 °C
41 °C40 °C39 °C
Max: 66 °C
Medel: 52.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  41 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 39.5 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 66 °C / 151 F, compared to the average of 42.1 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-9.2 °C / -16.6 F).
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
0%
-2%
9%
11%
-5%
3%
Maximum Upper Side *
56
53
5%
54
4%
49
12%
49
12%
49
12%
45.8 (28 - 68.8, n=682)
18%
Maximum Bottom *
66
65
2%
60
9%
63
5%
49
26%
58
12%
49.5 (25.9 - 78, n=680)
25%
Idle Upper Side *
27
26
4%
30
-11%
24
11%
25.4
6%
33
-22%
30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=633)
-14%
Idle Bottom *
27
30
-11%
30
-11%
25
7%
27.2
-1%
33
-22%
31.6 (21.1 - 50.3, n=631)
-17%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.440.32538.437.23129304035.2365028.527.56325.626.28026.225.910026.430.312523.234.41602348.120024.258.825023.761.73152063.24001962.350018.860630196880018.273.8100018.270.8125019.574160018.170.2200017.368.7250017.666.8315017.471.2400017.469.7500017.561630017.357.2800017.462.71000017.367.31250017.266.91600017.363.4SPL30.381.4N1.451median 18.2median 63.4Delta1.65.339.144.635.64028.430.433.537.726.428.525.527.429.23028.932.324.532.921.141.520.748.520.955.919.561.218.465.118.366.417.567.61867.918.665.317.469.216.765.817.264.517.365.917.26817.257.317.256.417.261.117.36617.262.217.259.61754.129.777.51.342.2median 17.4median 62.21.86.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigabyte Aero 15-X9Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.6 / 0.9 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 16 / 18 / 23 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 88 / 167 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-2%
-21%
13%
7%
-15%
-23%
Idle Minimum *
16
14
12%
17
-6%
7
56%
10.4
35%
16
-0%
19.6 (3.5 - 113, n=677)
-23%
Idle Average *
18
18
-0%
20
-11%
11
39%
14.6
19%
22
-22%
25 (6.8 - 119, n=677)
-39%
Idle Maximum *
23
22
4%
29
-26%
20
13%
16.3
29%
32
-39%
30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=677)
-31%
Load Average *
88
91
-3%
112
-27%
98
-11%
88.5
-1%
89
-1%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=668)
-18%
Load Maximum *
167
173
-4%
211
-26%
182
-9%
182.4
-9%
173
-4%
170 (21.9 - 590, n=667)
-2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
120
142
-18%
152
-27%
132
-10%
155.4
-30%
147
-23%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
9tim 9min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 44)
6tim 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6tim 04min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 54min
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 50 Wh
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500
8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
25%
-65%
-17%
-8%
-47%
-40%
Reader / Idle
549
762
39%
213
-61%
507
-8%
682
24%
335
-39%
342 (39 - 1174, n=649)
-38%
H.264
364
504
38%
356
-2%
252 (88 - 506, n=142)
-31%
WiFi v1.3
382
513
34%
157
-59%
362
-5%
387
1%
190
-50%
254 (78 - 622, n=340)
-34%
Load
174
156
-10%
42
-76%
81
-53%
88
-49%
81
-53%
79 (18 - 202, n=615)
-55%

För

+ X-Rite Pantone-certifiering
+ 144 Hz-skärm
+ kompakt och lätt design
+ utmärkt konstruktionskvalitet
+ subtil design
+ tunn skärminfattning
+ tangentbord med RGB-bakgrundsbelysning
+ praktisk mjukvara
+ snabb NVMe SSD
+ en extra M.2 2280-plats
+ Thunderbolt 3

Emot

- enkelkanals-RAM
- irriterande fläktljud
- blir varm
- högtalarna kunde varit bättre
- sämre batteritid än sin föregångare
Recension av Gigabyte Aero 15-X9-7DE0310P. Recensionsex från Gigabyte Germany.
Recension av Gigabyte Aero 15-X9-7DE0310P. Recensionsex från Gigabyte Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 är en utmärkt spellaptop men den utgör egentligen bara en förfining jämfört med sin föregångare och lägger dessutom till ett par brister. En Core i7-8750H processor och en RTX-2070 Max-Q GPU är en vinnande kombination som är tillräckligt kraftfull för att hantera alla AAA-spel med maximala grafikinställningar i 1080p. Vidare säkrar en NVMe SSD att systemet körs smidigt även vid ihållande belastning. Enheten är också lätt att underhålla och uppgradera, vilket är en bonus.

Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 är bland de bästa i klassen när det kommer till tunna och lätta bärbara speldatorer, men den är inte riktigt lika imponerande som föregångaren var för ett år sedan.

På samma sätt imponerade 144 Hz IPS-skärmen på oss med en X-Rite Pantone-certifiering, stabila betraktningsvinklar och korta responstider. Men skärmen är en aning mörk, vilket resulterar i ett dåligt kontrastförhållande.

Tyvärr är batteritiden en besvikelse med tanke på vilket utmärkt exempel föregångaren var på den punkten. Vi hoppas att detta är en bugg som Gigabyte kan fixa. Vidare genererar den kraftigare GPU:n mer värme vilket gör att enheten blir för varm för att ha i knät om man spelar eller redigerar video. Att den håller kvar vid enkelkanals-RAM resulterar också i en prestanda-flaskhals vilket känns onödigt och bör vara lätt för Razer att åtgärda. Som tur är kan alla dessa problem, bortsett från de höga temperaturerna, förhoppningsvis gå att lösa. Den här enheten kostar för tillfället också flera tusen kronor mer än sin föregångare men kommer ändå bara med mindre förbättringar. Sammanfattningsvis är Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 en av de bästa tunna och lätta bärbara speldatorerna som går att köpa för pengar, men det höga priset och problemen vi noterat vid skrivande stund innebär att vi inte kan rekommendera den lika mycket som föregångaren.

Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 - 02/25/2019 v6
Sascha Mölck

Design
87 / 98 → 89%
Tangentbord
83%
Mus
78%
Anslutningar
70 / 81 → 87%
Vikt
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Batteri
87%
Skärm
90%
Spelprestanda
95%
Programprestanda
95%
Temperatur
72 / 95 → 75%
Ljudnivå
71 / 90 → 79%
Audio
74%
Medel
80%
87%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Core i7-8750H, RTX 2070 Max-Q) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Sascha Mölck, 2019-02-28 (Update: 2019-02-28)