Notebookcheck

Test: Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro - Massor av funktioner och kraft till reapris (Sammanfattning)

Mittenskikts-löpare. Utmärkt prestanda i förhållande till priset - något som inte bara är typiskt för Xiaomis Redmi-serie utan gäller i ännu större utsträckning för Poco-telefonerna. Poco X3 Pro är inget undantag: för 2.500 kronor får du en snabb Snapdragon SoC, en IPS-skärm på 6.7 tum med bilduppdatering i 120 Hz, en fyrdubbel kamera, 6 GB RAM samt 128 GB UFS 3.1-lagring.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
, , , , , ,
sökrelation
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Poco X Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 8 x - 3 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 640
Minne
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4X
Skärm
6.67 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 395 PPI, Kapacitiv, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, glansig: ja, 120 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107.4 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Närhetssensor, Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Elektronisk kompass, 2x2 MIMO, Camera2 API Level 3, DRM Widevine L1, Huvud SAR 0.573 W/kg, Kropp SAR 0.899 W/kg
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), 4G/LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.4 x 165.3 x 76.8
Batteri
5160 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (1/2", f/1.79, 1.6 µm, autofokus); 8 MP ultra-vidvinkelskamera (f/2.2, FOV 119°); 2 MP makrokamera (f/2.4); 2 MP djupsensor (f/2.4); video i upp till [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.2
Övrigt
Högtalare: Dubbla, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Laddare på 33 Watt, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Skyddsfodral, Användarmanual, Garantikort, MIUI 12, 12 Månader Garanti, fanless
Vikt
215 g, Strömförsörjning: 86 g
Pris
250 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85 %
06/2021
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
SD 860, Adreno 640
215 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
81 %
01/2021
Motorola Moto G 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
212 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
80 %
01/2021
Oppo A73 5G
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
177 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
82 %
04/2021
realme 8 Pro
SD 720G, Adreno 618
176 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.40"2400x1080
83 %
04/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52
SD 720G, Adreno 618
189 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
84 %
04/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
SD 732G, Adreno 618
193 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080

Storleksjämförelse

166.1 mm 76.1 mm 9.9 mm 212 g165.3 mm 76.8 mm 9.4 mm 215 g164 mm 76.5 mm 8.1 mm 193 g162 mm 75 mm 7.9 mm 177 g161 mm 74 mm 8 mm 176 g159.9 mm 75.1 mm 8.4 mm 189 g
SDCardreader Transfer Speed - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
15.75 MB/s ∼100%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580859047.951.549.452.752.852.250.645.944.341.539.542.84843.139.242.839.941.538.238.736.435.144.739.634.939.736.546.243.537.144.740.442.539.344.143.545.932.838.44042.540.437.947.346.840.134.644.450.442.343.6434549.641.845.437.738.847.542.546.242.144.844.744.542.541.144.342.339.946.841.743.142.745.441.836.638.64245.346.841.246.43942.437.945.243.940.745.748.142.640.63542.540.246.644.946.640.641.743.940.537.246.242.14436.239.138.640.542.138.539.641.743.8414144.944.645.338.739.540.842.743.642.344.147.951.549.452.752.852.250.645.944.341.539.542.84843.139.242.839.941.538.238.736.435.144.739.634.939.736.546.243.537.144.740.442.539.344.143.545.932.838.44042.540.437.947.346.840.134.644.450.442.343.6434549.641.845.437.738.847.542.546.242.144.844.744.542.541.144.342.339.946.841.743.142.745.441.836.638.64245.346.841.246.43942.437.945.243.940.745.748.142.640.63542.540.246.644.946.640.641.743.940.537.246.242.14436.239.138.640.542.138.539.641.743.8414144.944.645.338.739.540.842.743.642.344.141.887.887.885.580.584.688.565.688.588.986.888.187.185.985.481.479.880.787.788.488.28587.985.588.988.18880.578.583.178.573.587.687.383.688.187.186.686.788.987.884.587.488.787.887.686.380.182.788.486.486.987.884.981.186.482.679.987.585.38586.485.787.689.786.187.184.387.886.687.783.379.888.786.184.390.781.883.886.987.686.186.786.488.288.585.987.385.487.688.783.882.886.886.485.887.686.584.384.988.186.187.28687.486.283.885.783.785.383.887.284.685.587.388.48587.288.384.187.883.387.388.885.28679.894Tooltip
; Sequential write: Ø42.6 (32.8-52.8)
; Sequential read: Ø85.3 (41.8-94)
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
665 (603min - 673max) MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
652 (326min - 669max) MBit/s ∼98%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=293, last 2 years)
401 MBit/s ∼60% -38%
Oppo A73 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (323min - 361max) MBit/s ∼51% -48%
realme 8 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
323 (279min - 332max) MBit/s ∼49% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
283 (148min - 297max) MBit/s ∼43% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
282 (141min - 293max) MBit/s ∼42% -57%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (481min - 662max) MBit/s ∼100% +29%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
486 (425min - 550max) MBit/s ∼77%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=293, last 2 years)
409 MBit/s ∼65% -16%
Oppo A73 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
340 (313min - 353max) MBit/s ∼54% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
331 (158min - 339max) MBit/s ∼53% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
310 (271min - 334max) MBit/s ∼49% -36%
realme 8 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
304 (218min - 328max) MBit/s ∼48% -37%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665441430467466487506511477495468479472465506510507481538550480425475521493527442458525481471441430467466487506511477495468479472465506510507481538550480425475521493527442458525481471326655652667654645638646643645639643653657645656655649658657655649669655650662658652656647Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø485 (425-550)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø641 (326-669)
GPS Test: Sammanfattning
GPS Test: Sammanfattning
GPS Test: Sjö
GPS Test: Sjö
GPS Test: Vägskäl
GPS Test: Vägskäl

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight scene 1Daylight scene 2Ultra wide-angle5x zoomLow-light photo
ColorChecker
11.1 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro: 8.22 ∆E min: 1.91 - max: 16.7 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.7 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
51.1 ∆E
42 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
52 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
36 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
48.4 ∆E
31 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
45.8 ∆E
40.7 ∆E
34 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro: 34.97 ∆E min: 13.55 - max: 51.98 ∆E
514
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
496
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
534
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
528
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Max: 567 cd/m² Medel: 524.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.15 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 567 cd/m²
Kontrast: 995:1 (Svärta: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
95.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Motorola Moto G 5G
LTPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.70
Oppo A73 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
realme 8 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Samsung Galaxy A52
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
-30%
-64%
-126%
-42%
-2%
Brightness middle
567
586
3%
527
-7%
581
2%
694
22%
653
15%
Brightness
524
565
8%
499
-5%
563
7%
696
33%
651
24%
Brightness Distribution
87
88
1%
87
0%
86
-1%
98
13%
98
13%
Black Level *
0.57
0.61
-7%
0.38
33%
Contrast
995
961
-3%
1387
39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1
1.74
-74%
3.5
-250%
4.34
-334%
2
-100%
1.2
-20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.1
4.09
-95%
7.3
-248%
7.15
-240%
6.7
-219%
2.9
-38%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.7
3
-76%
2.9
-71%
4.9
-188%
1.7
-0%
1.8
-6%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.244 98%
2.29 96%
2.327 95%
2.1 105%
2.25 98%
CCT
6343 102%
6000 108%
6502 100%
7658 85%
6440 101%
6426 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2404 Hz ≤ 38 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2404 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 38 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2404 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9726 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.2 ms rise
↘ 27.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.2 ms).
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
728 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
657 Points ∼90% -10%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
516 Points ∼71% -29%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
570 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
545 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
563 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
728 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=217, last 2 years)
559 Points ∼77% -23%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
2657 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1987 Points ∼75% -25%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1638 Points ∼62% -38%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1694 Points ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1622 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1728 Points ∼65% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
2657 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=217, last 2 years)
1923 Points ∼72% -28%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
2324 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1143 Points ∼49% -51%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1198 Points ∼52% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1176 Points ∼51% -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1182 Points ∼51% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
2324 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=109, last 2 years)
2032 Points ∼87% -13%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
2668 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1245 Points ∼47% -53%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1537 Points ∼58% -42%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1237 Points ∼46% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1226 Points ∼46% -54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1293 Points ∼48% -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
2668 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=113, last 2 years)
2125 Points ∼80% -20%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
9794 Points ∼92%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
10673 Points ∼100%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
9668 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
9898 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8543 Points ∼80%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=231, last 2 years)
9896 Points ∼93%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
11699 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
11699 Points ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
8076 Points ∼69% -31%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
7395 Points ∼63% -37%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
8463 Points ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
8411 Points ∼72% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8688 Points ∼74% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
  (11699 - 11699, n=2)
11699 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=265, last 2 years)
7803 Points ∼67% -33%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
39807 Points ∼99%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
23548 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
40241 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=217, last 2 years)
39378 Points ∼98%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
54788 Points ∼97%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
29682 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
49743 Points ∼88%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=217, last 2 years)
56697 Points ∼100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
20351 Points ∼84%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
13664 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
24117 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8324 - 59268, n=217, last 2 years)
22969 Points ∼95%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3998 Points ∼99%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3521 Points ∼88%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3678 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3683 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4021 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=258, last 2 years)
3323 Points ∼83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4097 Points ∼97%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3694 Points ∼87%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3839 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3853 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4232 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=258, last 2 years)
3904 Points ∼92%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3657 Points ∼100%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3024 Points ∼83%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3208 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3190 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3375 Points ∼92%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=258, last 2 years)
2719 Points ∼74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
7752 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4098 Points ∼53% -47%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3377 Points ∼44% -56%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3782 Points ∼49% -51%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3783 Points ∼49% -51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3887 Points ∼50% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
7752 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=270, last 2 years)
3809 Points ∼49% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
12070 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4211 Points ∼35% -65%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3497 Points ∼29% -71%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
4008 Points ∼33% -67%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
4005 Points ∼33% -67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4038 Points ∼33% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
12070 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=270, last 2 years)
4799 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
3442 Points ∼100%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3014 Points ∼88% -12%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3160 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3167 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3372 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
3442 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=268, last 2 years)
2844 Points ∼83% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2798 Points ∼100%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2529 Points ∼90%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2590 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2577 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2783 Points ∼99%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=256, last 2 years)
2605 Points ∼93%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2549 Points ∼92%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2418 Points ∼87%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2462 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2450 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2694 Points ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=256, last 2 years)
2771 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3566 Points ∼100%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3011 Points ∼84%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3168 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3149 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3372 Points ∼95%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=256, last 2 years)
2764 Points ∼78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
6871 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2956 Points ∼43% -57%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2653 Points ∼39% -61%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2743 Points ∼40% -60%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2727 Points ∼40% -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2938 Points ∼43% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
6871 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=268, last 2 years)
3095 Points ∼45% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
8218 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2762 Points ∼34% -66%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2561 Points ∼31% -69%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2642 Points ∼32% -68%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2620 Points ∼32% -68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2832 Points ∼34% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
8218 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=268, last 2 years)
3443 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
4367 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3659 Points ∼84% -16%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3037 Points ∼70% -30%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3164 Points ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3184 Points ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3311 Points ∼76% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
4367 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=268, last 2 years)
2900 Points ∼66% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
5406 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2601 Points ∼48% -52%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2410 Points ∼45% -55%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2454 Points ∼45% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2437 Points ∼45% -55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2610 Points ∼48% -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
5406 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 6977, n=210, last 2 years)
2631 Points ∼49% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
6987 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2479 Points ∼35% -65%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2354 Points ∼34% -66%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2382 Points ∼34% -66%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2373 Points ∼34% -66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2562 Points ∼37% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
6987 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 11259, n=210, last 2 years)
2969 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
3017 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2876 Points ∼95% -5%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2631 Points ∼87% -13%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2747 Points ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2693 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2773 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
3017 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=210, last 2 years)
2645 Points ∼88% -12%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
3488 Points ∼95%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3658 Points ∼100% +5%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1233 Points ∼34% -65%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1052 Points ∼29% -70%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1052 Points ∼29% -70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1143 Points ∼31% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
3488 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=76, last 2 years)
2792 Points ∼76% -20%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
3455 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1098 Points ∼32% -68%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1207 Points ∼35% -65%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1052 Points ∼30% -70%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1044 Points ∼30% -70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1124 Points ∼33% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
3455 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 8672, n=73, last 2 years)
3045 Points ∼88% -12%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
119 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
55 fps ∼46% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
70 fps ∼59% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
81 fps ∼68% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
119 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=215, last 2 years)
55.8 fps ∼47% -53%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
184 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
90 fps ∼49% -51%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
67 fps ∼36% -64%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
77 fps ∼42% -58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
91 fps ∼49% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
184 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=215, last 2 years)
103 fps ∼56% -44%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
103 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
40 fps ∼39% -61%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
37 fps ∼36% -64%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
37 fps ∼36% -64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
40 fps ∼39% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
103 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=213, last 2 years)
44 fps ∼43% -57%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
110 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
45 fps ∼41% -59%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
37 fps ∼34% -66%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
39 fps ∼35% -65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
45 fps ∼41% -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
110 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=214, last 2 years)
60.6 fps ∼55% -45%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
74 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
29 fps ∼39% -61%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
24 fps ∼32% -68%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
27 fps ∼36% -64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼39% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
74 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=211, last 2 years)
34.5 fps ∼47% -53%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
77 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
33 fps ∼43% -57%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
27 fps ∼35% -65%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
31 fps ∼40% -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
33 fps ∼43% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
77 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=211, last 2 years)
41.5 fps ∼54% -46%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
44 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
16 fps ∼36% -64%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
13 fps ∼30% -70%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
15 fps ∼34% -66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼39% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
44 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=210, last 2 years)
21.7 fps ∼49% -51%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
46 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
18 fps ∼39% -61%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
15 fps ∼33% -67%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼37% -63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
19 fps ∼41% -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
46 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=210, last 2 years)
24.8 fps ∼54% -46%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
45 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
17 fps ∼38% -62%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
15 fps ∼33% -67%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼38% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼38% -62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼40% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
45 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=271, last 2 years)
21.5 fps ∼48% -52%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
46 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
19 fps ∼41% -59%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
17 fps ∼37% -63%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
19 fps ∼41% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
19 fps ∼41% -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
21 fps ∼46% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
46 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=271, last 2 years)
24.8 fps ∼54% -46%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
29 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
11 fps ∼38% -62%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
9.2 fps ∼32% -68%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
11 fps ∼38% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
11 fps ∼38% -62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼38% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
29 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=272, last 2 years)
14.3 fps ∼49% -51%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
17 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7.5 fps ∼44% -56%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
6.1 fps ∼36% -64%
realme 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
7 fps ∼41% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
7.1 fps ∼42% -58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
7.4 fps ∼44% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
17 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=271, last 2 years)
9.81 fps ∼58% -42%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
483527 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
291387 Points ∼60% -40%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
253013 Points ∼52% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
288306 Points ∼60% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
292450 Points ∼60% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
483527 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=180, last 2 years)
333545 Points ∼69% -31%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
6950 Score ∼100%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2506 Score ∼36% -64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2538 Score ∼37% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
6950 Score ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 7649, n=56, last 2 years)
3290 Score ∼47% -53%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
46152 Points ∼83%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
13120 Points ∼24% -72%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
21348 Points ∼38% -54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4958 Points ∼9% -89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
46152 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 264766, n=55, last 2 years)
55606 Points ∼100% +20%
Basemark GPU 1.2
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
67.6 fps ∼100%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
23.47 fps ∼35% -65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
28.82 (1629min - 40.39max) fps ∼43% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
67.6 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.7 - 98.8, n=40, last 2 years)
37.3 fps ∼55% -45%
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
59.89 fps ∼100%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
20.93 fps ∼35% -65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
28.12 (16.2min - 63.34max) fps ∼47% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
59.9 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 74.1, n=39, last 2 years)
31.7 fps ∼53% -47%
1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
448.9 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
232.33 (92.39min - 1023.24max) fps ∼52% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
449 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (29.8 - 559, n=35, last 2 years)
228 fps ∼51% -49%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
64.92 fps ∼100%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
44.63 fps ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
28.78 (16.88min - 48.34max) fps ∼44% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
64.9 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.79 - 84.4, n=39, last 2 years)
35.8 fps ∼55% -45%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
57.37 fps ∼100%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
18.02 fps ∼31% -69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
25.21 (14.33min - 52.34max) fps ∼44% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
57.4 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.5 - 68.7, n=39, last 2 years)
29.8 fps ∼52% -48%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
5224 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3654 Points ∼70% -30%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3019 Points ∼58% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3287 Points ∼63% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3365 Points ∼64% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
5224 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=199, last 2 years)
3536 Points ∼68% -32%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
8549 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7064 Points ∼83% -17%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
5692 Points ∼67% -33%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
5783 Points ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
5972 Points ∼70% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
8549 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=199, last 2 years)
6486 Points ∼76% -24%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
5716 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4769 Points ∼83% -17%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
4185 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3845 Points ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4043 Points ∼71% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
5716 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=199, last 2 years)
4129 Points ∼72% -28%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
10549 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3987 Points ∼38% -62%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2687 Points ∼25% -75%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3830 Points ∼36% -64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4086 Points ∼39% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
10549 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=199, last 2 years)
5466 Points ∼52% -48%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
1445 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1233 Points ∼85% -15%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1297 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1371 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1228 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
1445 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=199, last 2 years)
1252 Points ∼87% -13%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
62.028 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
62 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
54.419 Points ∼88% -12%
Motorola Moto G 5G (Chrome88)
52.751 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=182, last 2 years)
49.7 Points ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
49.472 Points ∼80% -20%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
34.002 Points ∼55% -45%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
110.16 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
110 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
94.658 Points ∼86% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
89.832 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=191, last 2 years)
88.1 Points ∼80% -20%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
70.069 Points ∼64% -36%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
59 runs/min ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
59 runs/min ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=162, last 2 years)
50.6 runs/min ∼86% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
43.2 runs/min ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
37.9 runs/min ∼64% -36%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
37.7 runs/min ∼64% -36%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
90 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
90 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
78 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=201, last 2 years)
77.1 Points ∼86% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
71 Points ∼79% -21%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
49 Points ∼54% -46%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
23902 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
23902 Points ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto G 5G (Chrome88)
17786 Points ∼74% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
17734 Points ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
17293 Points ∼72% -28%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=209, last 2 years)
17018 Points ∼71% -29%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
14886 Points ∼62% -38%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=212, last 2 years)
4185 ms * ∼100% -94%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
4059.1 ms * ∼97% -88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
2832.3 ms * ∼68% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
2532.1 ms * ∼61% -18%
Motorola Moto G 5G (Chrome88)
2467.7 ms * ∼59% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
2155 ms * ∼51% -0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
2154.8 ms * ∼51%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Poco X3 ProMotorola Moto G 5GOppo A73 5Grealme 8 ProSamsung Galaxy A52Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-30%
-50%
-58%
-43%
-42%
28%
-39%
Sequential Read 256KB
1330.34
821.9
-38%
859.98
-35%
474
-64%
511.13
-62%
511.55
-62%
1559 (1330 - 1730, n=16)
17%
729 (41.9 - 2037, n=277, last 2 years)
-45%
Sequential Write 256KB
527.22
243
-54%
193.04
-63%
191.7
-64%
267.14
-49%
267.99
-49%
765 (527 - 1095, n=16)
45%
316 (11.9 - 1321, n=277, last 2 years)
-40%
Random Read 4KB
203.15
157.8
-22%
102.16
-50%
98.5
-52%
135.54
-33%
146.52
-28%
235 (133 - 317, n=16)
16%
130 (13.5 - 325, n=277, last 2 years)
-36%
Random Write 4KB
176.9
167.8
-5%
88.11
-50%
84.8
-52%
127.27
-28%
126.65
-28%
235 (121 - 306, n=16)
33%
114 (4.97 - 330, n=277, last 2 years)
-36%
05101520253035404550556029302930303030303030302930303030302931293028293030303030303030302930303030303030303029303028303030303030303030303030303029303030303030302931293129303030303030293129312930303030303030303029302930303030302929252728303030302930303030303030303030302930302930303030303030303029303030292930302930293030303030303030293030303030293129302829303030303030303030293030303030303030302930302830303030303030303030303030302930303030303030293129312930303030303029312931293030303030303030302930293030303030292925272830303030293030303030303030303030293030293030303030303030302930303029293030575358516056606059515360606060596051606060596060606059605960606060605859605760595759586059606060596060605960605957605959445860605760606060606056606058575460606060605657575360606059606060606060596057606060605960575157575460606060605859606060606053596060606060556060606060605960606060605860293029303030303030303029303030303029312930282930303030303030303029303030303030303030293030283030303030303030303030303030293030303030303029312931293030303030302931293129303030303030303030293029303030303029292527283030303029303030303030303030303029303029303030303030303030293030302929303057535851605660605951536060606059605160606059606060605960596060606060585960576059575958605960606059606060596060595760595944586060576060606060605660605857546060606060565757536060605960606060606059605760606060596057515757546060606060585960606060605359606060606055606060606060596060606060586030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030293130303030303030302930313030293030303130302930303031303029303031303029303030303130293030303030312930303030303030303030303030303030293130303030303030303030302931303030303030303030303030303030303030293130303030302931303030303029312931Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.59.8: Ø29.8 (25-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.8.4a: Ø58.8 (44-60)
; PUBG Mobile; 1.4.0: Ø30 (29-31)
3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.4 (3313min - 3471max) % ∼100%
Hög belastning
 40.4 °C40.5 °C40.3 °C 
 39.1 °C39 °C40 °C 
 36.6 °C37.4 °C39.2 °C 
Max: 40.5 °C
Medel: 39.2 °C
37.7 °C38.8 °C39 °C
36.6 °C38.2 °C38.4 °C
36.4 °C37.6 °C37.9 °C
Max: 39 °C
Medel: 37.8 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  27.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.134252831.53124.124.14025.328503640.6632427.18020.62010014.52112510.32716013.646.220011.749.525011.454.231512.458.140010.161.450011.767.563011.567.580010.170.3100010.372.6125010.974.8160012.475.6200010.777.3250011.979.6315012.778400013.180.5500013.178.9630013.672.2800014.369.21000013.669.41250014.1651600014.663.1SPL24.588.3N0.570.9median 12.4median 69.2Delta1.39.8383628.933.923.837.825.337.73940.323.442.619.342.116.143.210.54415.345.71548.29.655.212.459.610.163.511.466.81171.514.574.610.97913.582.210.881.111.481.31280.712.580.91379.213.179.813.675.513.470.913.569.913.970.914.758.624.891.10.683.8median 13median 70.91.611.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco X3 ProOppo A73 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Oppo A73 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.17 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.79 / 2.21 / 2.26 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 6.17 / 10.09 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
5160 mAh
Motorola Moto G 5G
5000 mAh
Oppo A73 5G
4040 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
5020 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-5%
32%
27%
15%
0%
12%
Idle Minimum *
0.79
1.3
-65%
0.58
27%
0.88
-11%
1.05
-33%
0.79
-0%
0.931 (0.37 - 2.5, n=229, last 2 years)
-18%
Idle Average *
2.21
1.5
32%
1.86
16%
1.8
19%
1.8
19%
2.21
-0%
1.846 (0.82 - 3.94, n=229, last 2 years)
16%
Idle Maximum *
2.26
2.1
7%
1.88
17%
1.84
19%
1.85
18%
2.26
-0%
2.12 (0.85 - 4.2, n=229, last 2 years)
6%
Load Average *
6.17
7
-13%
3.1
50%
2.65
57%
4.2
32%
6.17
-0%
4.43 (2.1 - 8.4, n=229, last 2 years)
28%
Load Maximum *
10.09
8.9
12%
5.01
50%
4.86
52%
6.29
38%
10.1
-0%
7.22 (3.16 - 12.3, n=229, last 2 years)
28%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
39tim 32min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14tim 39min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16tim 13min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 36min
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
5160 mAh
Motorola Moto G 5G
5000 mAh
Oppo A73 5G
4040 mAh
realme 8 Pro
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A52
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
5020 mAh
Battery Runtime
20%
62%
14%
-2%
-5%
Reader / Idle
2372
2093
-12%
1489
-37%
H.264
973
1027
6%
1232
27%
WiFi v1.3
879
1056
20%
1426
62%
1006
14%
836
-5%
753
-14%
Load
276
289
5%
283
3%

För

+ Ljusstark IPS-skärm med bilduppdatering i 120 Hz
+ IP53-certifiering
+ UFS 3.1-lagring
+ NFC
+ Bra GPS
+ Snabb Snapdragon 860 SoC
+ Stereohögtalare
+ Bra batteritid

Emot

- Ej 5G
- Endast hybrid Dual-SIM
- Svag makrolins
- Stryps vid belastning

Omdöme - Mycket smartphone för 2.500 kronor

Recension av Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro. Recensionsex från Xiaomi Germany.
Recension av Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro. Recensionsex från Xiaomi Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Poco X3 Pro visar sig vara en värdig representant för Xiaomis Poco-serie, för även den ger mycket för pengarna. En höjdpunkt är att den har en Snapdragon 860 SoC, som är en aning utdaterad tekniskt sett men som har prestanda som ligger över genomsnittet för mittenskiktet.

Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro är en riktigt snabb mittenskiktstelefon med massor av funktioner till ett lågt pris.

Poco X3 Pro får också poäng för en IPS-skärm med bilduppdatering i 120 Hz, gedigen batteritid, snabb UFS 3.1-lagring samt en huvudkamera på 48 MP som tar bra bilder i dagsljus. Dessutom har den mindre viktiga men ändå trevliga detaljer som IP53-certifiering, 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, NFC, IR-sändare, notis-LED samt stereohögtalare.

Listan över brister är också ganska liten för Xiaomis smartphone: makrokameran på 2 MP känns knappt användbar på grund av den låga upplösningen och Poco X3 Pro kommer varken med 5G eller OLED-skärm. Vill man ha detta kan man till exempel titta på