Notebookcheck

Test: Xiaomi Redmi 5A Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Felicitas Krohn (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 07/24/2018

Small all-rounder. Med Redmi 5A erbjuder Xiaomi en billig och kompakt Android-telefon som är lämplig för enkla applikationer och prismedvetna köpare. I den här recensionen avslöjar vi vad man kan förvänta sig av en enhet på 5 tum för under 1.000 kronor.

Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Redmi Serie)
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 308
Minne
2048 MB 
Skärm
5 tum 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixlar 294 PPI, kapacitiv, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infraröd, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD, upp till 128 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: accelerometer, närhetssensor, microUSB
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, 2G GSM (2/3/5/8), 3G WCDMA (1/2/5/8), 4G TDD-LTE (38/40), 4G FDD-LTE (1/3/4/5/7/8/20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.4 x 140.4 x 70.1
Batteri
3000 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, LED-blixt, [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.0
Övrigt
Högtalare: 1 högtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, SIM-verktyg, USB-laddare, MicroUSB-kabel, MIUI Global 9.1, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värde (kropp): 1,234 W/kg, SAR-värde (huvud): 0,530 W/kg, fanless
Vikt
137 g, Strömförsörjning: 55 g
Pris
100 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Xiaomi Redmi 5A

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=302)
210 MBit/s ∼100% +346%
Umidigi A1 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s ∼27% +18%
Nokia 2
Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 8 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 MBit/s ∼26% +18%
Huawei Y6 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50.5 MBit/s ∼24% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.1 MBit/s ∼22%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45 MBit/s ∼21% -4%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=302)
205 MBit/s ∼100% +318%
Umidigi A1 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.8 MBit/s ∼27% +14%
Nokia 2
Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 8 GB eMMC Flash
54.2 MBit/s ∼26% +11%
Huawei Y6 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.2 MBit/s ∼25% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49 MBit/s ∼24%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.7 MBit/s ∼23% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Xiaomi Redmi 5A - Testkarta
Xiaomi Redmi 5A - Testkarta (Detalj)
534
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
537
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 537 cd/m² Medel: 498.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.75 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 84 %
Mitt på batteriet: 503 cd/m²
Kontrast: 689:1 (Svärta: 0.73 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.44 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
96.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.451
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Honor 7A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Umidigi A1 Pro
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Nokia 2
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Huawei Y6 2018
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Screen
33%
37%
7%
13%
Brightness middle
503
417
-17%
594
18%
527
5%
483
-4%
Brightness
499
395
-21%
570
14%
503
1%
460
-8%
Brightness Distribution
84
88
5%
86
2%
91
8%
88
5%
Black Level *
0.73
0.18
75%
0.22
70%
0.68
7%
0.4
45%
Contrast
689
2317
236%
2700
292%
775
12%
1208
75%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.44
6.46
-19%
6.63
-22%
5.3
3%
5.8
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.01
10.72
-7%
13.99
-40%
9.2
8%
12.6
-26%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.8
5.8
15%
9.2
-35%
5.8
15%
5
26%
Gamma
2.451 90%
2.423 91%
2.24 98%
2.12 104%
2.6 85%
CCT
6590 99%
7839 83%
8663 75%
7894 82%
7709 84%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.42

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8964 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
36883 Points ∼49%
Honor 7A
46126 Points ∼61% +25%
Umidigi A1 Pro
36073 Points ∼47% -2%
Nokia 2
24924 Points ∼33% -32%
Huawei Y6 2018
39089 Points ∼51% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (30924 - 39106, n=11)
36649 Points ∼48% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=386)
76035 Points ∼100% +106%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
43861 Points ∼37%
Honor 7A
59990 Points ∼51% +37%
Umidigi A1 Pro
45868 Points ∼39% +5%
Huawei Y6 2018
46710 Points ∼39% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (32557 - 46710, n=6)
42950 Points ∼36% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=169)
118333 Points ∼100% +170%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
3402 Points ∼75%
Honor 7A
3892 Points ∼86% +14%
Umidigi A1 Pro
3159 Points ∼69% -7%
Nokia 2
2304 Points ∼51% -32%
Huawei Y6 2018
3629 Points ∼80% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2829 - 3629, n=11)
3272 Points ∼72% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=254)
4550 Points ∼100% +34%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
4559 Points ∼89%
Honor 7A
5109 Points ∼100% +12%
Umidigi A1 Pro
4330 Points ∼85% -5%
Nokia 2
3109 Points ∼61% -32%
Huawei Y6 2018
4756 Points ∼93% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (0 - 4813, n=11)
4040 Points ∼79% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=422)
4954 Points ∼97% +9%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
723 Points ∼100%
Honor 7A
705 Points ∼98% -2%
Umidigi A1 Pro
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Nokia 2
9 Points ∼1% -99%
Huawei Y6 2018
616 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (616 - 802, n=11)
694 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=498)
698 Points ∼97% -3%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
444 Points ∼26%
Honor 7A
739 Points ∼43% +66%
Umidigi A1 Pro
184 Points ∼11% -59%
Nokia 2
251 Points ∼14% -43%
Huawei Y6 2018
443 Points ∼25% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (428 - 447, n=11)
439 Points ∼25% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=498)
1738 Points ∼100% +291%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
762 Points ∼61%
Honor 7A
1209 Points ∼97% +59%
Umidigi A1 Pro
802 Points ∼64% +5%
Nokia 2
233 Points ∼19% -69%
Huawei Y6 2018
1069 Points ∼86% +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (502 - 1372, n=11)
778 Points ∼63% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=498)
1244 Points ∼100% +63%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
1463 Points ∼58%
Honor 7A
1962 Points ∼78% +34%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1318 Points ∼53% -10%
Nokia 2
901 Points ∼36% -38%
Huawei Y6 2018
1043 Points ∼42% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1043 - 1477, n=11)
1297 Points ∼52% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=498)
2508 Points ∼100% +71%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
774 Points ∼62%
Honor 7A
1055 Points ∼84% +36%
Umidigi A1 Pro
208 Points ∼17% -73%
Nokia 2
149 Points ∼12% -81%
Huawei Y6 2018
743 Points ∼59% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (371 - 891, n=11)
712 Points ∼57% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=502)
1254 Points ∼100% +62%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
1333 Points ∼29%
Honor 7A
2127 Points ∼47% +60%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1450 Points ∼32% +9%
Huawei Y6 2018
1419 Points ∼31% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1113 - 1460, n=9)
1337 Points ∼30% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=196)
4525 Points ∼100% +239%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
1874 Points ∼44%
Honor 7A
2820 Points ∼65% +50%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1852 Points ∼43% -1%
Nokia 2
1118 Points ∼26% -40%
Huawei Y6 2018
1939 Points ∼45% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (883 - 1939, n=11)
1753 Points ∼41% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=246)
4306 Points ∼100% +130%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
681 Points ∼54%
Honor 7A
675 Points ∼53% -1%
Umidigi A1 Pro
665 Points ∼52% -2%
Nokia 2
423 Points ∼33% -38%
Huawei Y6 2018
692 Points ∼55% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (541 - 692, n=11)
657 Points ∼52% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=247)
1269 Points ∼100% +86%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
903 Points ∼59%
Honor 7A
1259 Points ∼82% +39%
Umidigi A1 Pro
537 Points ∼35% -41%
Nokia 2
539 Points ∼35% -40%
Huawei Y6 2018
907 Points ∼59% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (622 - 907, n=11)
862 Points ∼56% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=383)
1538 Points ∼100% +70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
43 Points ∼3%
Honor 7A
535 Points ∼33% +1144%
Umidigi A1 Pro
140 Points ∼9% +226%
Nokia 2
120 Points ∼7% +179%
Huawei Y6 2018
55 Points ∼3% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (31 - 55, n=11)
45.2 Points ∼3% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=383)
1632 Points ∼100% +3695%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
55 Points ∼4%
Honor 7A
613 Points ∼44% +1015%
Umidigi A1 Pro
168 Points ∼12% +205%
Nokia 2
120 Points ∼9% +118%
Huawei Y6 2018
70 Points ∼5% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (39 - 70, n=11)
57.3 Points ∼4% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=391)
1387 Points ∼100% +2422%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
10556 Points ∼82%
Honor 7A
9249 Points ∼72% -12%
Nokia 2
7150 Points ∼56% -32%
Huawei Y6 2018
10344 Points ∼80% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3958 - 10556, n=11)
9501 Points ∼74% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=538)
12873 Points ∼100% +22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
5532 Points ∼31%
Honor 7A
9684 Points ∼54% +75%
Nokia 2
4150 Points ∼23% -25%
Huawei Y6 2018
5426 Points ∼30% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2546 - 5547, n=11)
5222 Points ∼29% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=538)
17989 Points ∼100% +225%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
6186 Points ∼41%
Honor 7A
9584 Points ∼63% +55%
Nokia 2
4577 Points ∼30% -26%
Huawei Y6 2018
6067 Points ∼40% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2951 - 6186, n=11)
5748 Points ∼38% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=539)
15106 Points ∼100% +144%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
7.7 fps ∼25%
Honor 7A
16 fps ∼51% +108%
Umidigi A1 Pro
6 fps ∼19% -22%
Nokia 2
5.4 fps ∼17% -30%
Huawei Y6 2018
7.7 fps ∼25% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3.4 - 7.8, n=11)
7.29 fps ∼23% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=563)
31.3 fps ∼100% +306%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
14 fps ∼52%
Honor 7A
27 fps ∼100% +93%
Umidigi A1 Pro
9.7 fps ∼36% -31%
Nokia 2
9.6 fps ∼36% -31%
Huawei Y6 2018
14 fps ∼52% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (6.4 - 14, n=11)
12.9 fps ∼48% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=566)
24.9 fps ∼92% +78%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
2.8 fps ∼17%
Honor 7A
7.1 fps ∼42% +154%
Umidigi A1 Pro
2.7 fps ∼16% -4%
Nokia 2
1.6 fps ∼10% -43%
Huawei Y6 2018
2.8 fps ∼17% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1.3 - 2.8, n=11)
2.65 fps ∼16% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=485)
16.8 fps ∼100% +500%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
6 fps ∼38%
Honor 7A
14 fps ∼88% +133%
Umidigi A1 Pro
5.4 fps ∼34% -10%
Nokia 2
4.4 fps ∼28% -27%
Huawei Y6 2018
5.9 fps ∼37% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3.7 - 6.4, n=11)
5.65 fps ∼35% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=488)
16 fps ∼100% +167%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Redmi 5A Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Umidigi A1 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=421)
36.7 Points ∼100% +105%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
18.55 Points ∼51% +3%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
18.394 Points ∼50% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)
17.927 Points ∼49%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
17.857 Points ∼49% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (15.9 - 18.7, n=10)
17.6 Points ∼48% -2%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)
11.607 Points ∼32% -35%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=556)
5550 Points ∼100% +72%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
3389 Points ∼61% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)
3224 Points ∼58%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
3191 Points ∼57% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2503 - 3289, n=11)
2953 Points ∼53% -8%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
2582 Points ∼47% -20%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)
1948 Points ∼35% -40%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)
19274.5 ms * ∼100% -47%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
16192.4 ms * ∼84% -23%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
15718 ms * ∼82% -20%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
14709 ms * ∼76% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)
13112.2 ms * ∼68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (10742 - 16192, n=11)
12977 ms * ∼67% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=577)
11486 ms * ∼60% +12%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi 5AHonor 7A Umidigi A1 ProNokia 2Huawei Y6 2018Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
5%
-8%
-22%
2%
-36%
8%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
58.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
61.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
37 (6.38 - 65.4, n=110)
-41%
45.4 (3.4 - 87.1, n=316)
-27%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
81.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
55.6 (10.8 - 87.7, n=110)
-35%
63.7 (8.2 - 96.5, n=316)
-25%
Random Write 4KB
9.28
9.4
1%
10.2
10%
8.1
-13%
9
-3%
7.33 (0.49 - 37.9, n=225)
-21%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=606)
73%
Random Read 4KB
42.32
39.2
-7%
29.6
-30%
17.44
-59%
38.8
-8%
19.9 (2.49 - 61.7, n=225)
-53%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=606)
-9%
Sequential Write 256KB
49.86
72.5
45%
44.4
-11%
50.77
2%
65.6
32%
41.5 (8.74 - 97.6, n=225)
-17%
79.7 (2.99 - 246, n=606)
60%
Sequential Read 256KB
293.76
254.8
-13%
269.2
-8%
131.15
-55%
254.3
-13%
157 (9.66 - 294, n=225)
-47%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=606)
-22%
Hög belastning
 42.5 °C39 °C39.4 °C 
 41.7 °C39.1 °C40.3 °C 
 40.6 °C38.9 °C40.4 °C 
Max: 42.5 °C
Medel: 40.2 °C
37.4 °C40.2 °C39.9 °C
37.4 °C39.9 °C39.7 °C
37.5 °C39.1 °C39.5 °C
Max: 40.2 °C
Medel: 39 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  37.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202727.82525.927.63129.532.24031.428.75032.634.26324.123.28023.122.710024.123.112517.21916016.623.620016.833.225016.438.731514.147.540013.85750013.662.763012.163.380011.564.2100011.566.9125011.265.5160011.263.5200011.264.7250011.265315011.166.2400011.266.1500011.266.7630011.465.2800011.466.81000011.360.81250011.450.31600011.441.8SPL6023.977.1N13.70.539.7median 11.4median 63.3Delta1.811.542.646.338.438.734.231.337.326.53031.826.62823.222.421.221.12121.616.326.416.636.715.841.213.546.312.251.61252.611.75510.558.79.661.69.563.6965.38.567.48.569.28.371.38.269.38.167.68.165.18.162.38.264.48.353.38.235.265.451.721.959.978.619.17.10.31239median 9.5median 58.72.812.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi 5AHonor 7A
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 5A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 7A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.1 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.2 / 1.5 / 1.8 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 2.9 / 4.8 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
3000 mAh
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Umidigi A1 Pro
3150 mAh
Nokia 2
4100 mAh
Huawei Y6 2018
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-27%
-54%
12%
-62%
-38%
-12%
Idle Minimum *
1.2
1.3
-8%
1.8
-50%
0.55
54%
1.7
-42%
1.245 (0.54 - 4.02, n=11)
-4%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=634)
27%
Idle Average *
1.5
1.6
-7%
2.3
-53%
1.02
32%
2.5
-67%
2.43 (1.2 - 6, n=11)
-62%
1.721 (0.6 - 6.2, n=633)
-15%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
2.9
-61%
3.2
-78%
1.09
39%
3.2
-78%
2.79 (1.62 - 6.64, n=11)
-55%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=634)
-11%
Load Average *
2.9
3.7
-28%
4.7
-62%
4.48
-54%
5.2
-79%
4.44 (2.9 - 9.6, n=11)
-53%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=628)
-39%
Load Maximum *
4.8
6.4
-33%
6
-25%
5.32
-11%
6.8
-42%
5.58 (4.3 - 7.34, n=11)
-16%
5.75 (1.2 - 14.2, n=628)
-20%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16tim 49min
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
3000 mAh
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Umidigi A1 Pro
3150 mAh
Nokia 2
4100 mAh
Huawei Y6 2018
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
1009
657
-35%
608
-40%
840
-17%
643
-36%

För

+ lång batteritid
+ dual-SIM plus utökningsbar lagring
+ IR-sändare

Emot

- skärm med dåligt kontrastförhållande
- ingen USB Typ C
- utdaterat OS
Recenseras: Xiaomi Redmi 5A. Recensionsex från: notebooksbilliger.de
Recenseras: Xiaomi Redmi 5A. Recensionsex från: notebooksbilliger.de

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Xiaomi Redmi 5A är en kompakt enhet med ett oslagbart förhållande mellan pris och prestanda. Men den kan bara rekommenderas till den som inte behöver särskilt mycket kraft och i huvudsak kommer använda den för att ta en bild då och då eller för att sända meddelanden via WhatsApp. Med det sagt så levererar Redmi 5A tillräckligt med prestanda för att operativsystemet (Android 7.1) ska kännas smidigt.

Utöver fördelarna denna kompakta smartphone har finns det även några nackdelar. Skärmens kontrastförhållande och nivå av svärta är knappt uthärdliga och reflektioner gör det svårt att läsa av skärmens innehåll utomhus.

Xiaomi Redmi 5A är en gedigen smartphone som är väldigt lätt att hantera. Med en prislapp på under 1.000 kronor erbjuder den det bästa förhållandet mellan pris och prestanda i den här priskategorin.

Xiaomi Redmi 5A - 07/16/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Design
76%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 86%
Mus
79%
Anslutningar
37 / 60 → 61%
Vikt
93%
Batteri
100%
Skärm
83%
Spelprestanda
6 / 63 → 10%
Programprestanda
40 / 70 → 57%
Temperatur
88%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
87 / 91 → 96%
Camera
63%
Medel
71%
80%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Redmi 5A Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Mike Wobker, 2018-07-24 (Update: 2018-07-24)