Test: Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Mi A2 Lite) Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Name: Test: Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Mi A2 Lite) Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Item: Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro
Rating: 84
Author: Marcus Herbrich

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 08/20/2018

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Ett jack här, ett jack där - det är jack överallt. I och med Xiaomi's Redmi-serie har förra årets "innovation" från Cupertino nått telefonerna i den billigare delen av mittenskiktet. Redmi 6 har enastående prestanda i kombination med – eller snarare trots – jacket i skärmens övre tredjedel. Vår detaljerade recension har mer information om hur Xiaomi's telefon presterar och besvarar frågan om huruvida det är värt att importera denna mittenskiktstelefon.

Test device courtesy of tradingshenzhen.com

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Redmi Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 625

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 506

Minne

4096 MB

Skärm

5.84 tum 19:9, 2280 x 1080 pixlar 432 PPI, kapacitiv multitouch-skärm, LCD IPS, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 51.4 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, 1 Infraröd, Ljudanslutningar: hörlursanslutning (3.5 mm), Kortläsare: microUSB upp till 256 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: accelerationssensor, gyroskop, närhetssensor, kompass, Trippeltråg (2x nano-SIM, 1x SD-kort), OTG, status-LED, Miracast, ansiktsupplåsning

Nätverk

802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, nätverksstandard 4G/FDD LTE - 2100MHz(1)/1800MHz(3)/850MHz(5)/2600MHz(7)/900MHz(8) nätverksstandard 3G/WCDMA 850/900/1900/2100MHz nätverksstandard 2G/GSM 900/1800/1900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.8 x 149.3 x 71.7

Batteri

4000 mAh Litiumpolymer

Operativsystem

Android 8.1 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix 12+5MP, f/2.2, fasdetekterande AF, LED-blixt, Video @1080p/30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Övrigt

Högtalare: monohögtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt, nätadapter, micro-USB kabel, modulär nätadapter, MiUI, 12 Månader Garanti, SAR: 0.94 W/kg (kropp), 0.74 W/kg (huvud), fanless

Vikt

178 g, Strömförsörjning: 65 g

Pris

180 Kr

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Storleksjämförelse

Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» T opp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 939, n=427)	226 MBit/s ∼100% +93%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	121 MBit/s ∼54% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	117 MBit/s ∼52%
Xiaomi Black Shark Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	116 MBit/s ∼51% -1%
LG K11 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash	46.1 MBit/s ∼20% -61%
Honor 7C Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	46 MBit/s ∼20% -61%
Wiko View Max PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash	45.6 MBit/s ∼20% -61%
HTC Desire 12 Plus Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	45 MBit/s ∼20% -62%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 703, n=427)	216 MBit/s ∼100% +82%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	119 MBit/s ∼55%
Xiaomi Black Shark Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	117 MBit/s ∼54% -2%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	108 MBit/s ∼50% -9%
LG K11 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash	58.6 MBit/s ∼27% -51%
Honor 7C Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	53 MBit/s ∼25% -55%
Wiko View Max PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash	48.1 MBit/s ∼22% -60%
HTC Desire 12 Plus Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	46.8 MBit/s ∼22% -61%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


516 cd/m²	550 cd/m²	551 cd/m²
518 cd/m²	554 cd/m²	529 cd/m²
529 cd/m²	564 cd/m²	533 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 564 cd/m² Medel: 538.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.37 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 554 cd/m²
Kontrast: 908:1 (Svärta: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.86 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.281

	Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro LCD IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84	HTC Desire 12 Plus IPS, 1440x720, 6	Wiko View Max IPS, 1440x720, 5.99	Honor 7C IPS, 1440x720, 5.99	Motorola Moto G5s Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5	LG K11 IPS, 1280x720, 5.3	Xiaomi Black Shark IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Screen		-9%	-28%	-12%	16%	-45%	0%
Brightness middle	554	418 -25%	515 -7%	392 -29%	512 -8%	394 -29%	549 -1%
Brightness	538	414 -23%	498 -7%	403 -25%	500 -7%	385 -28%	541 1%
Brightness Distribution	91	93 2%	90 -1%	85 -7%	90 -1%	93 2%	95 4%
Black Level *	0.61	0.7 -15%	0.48 21%	0.61 -0%	0.35 43%	0.66 -8%	0.42 31%
Contrast	908	597 -34%	1073 18%	643 -29%	1463 61%	597 -34%	1307 44%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	4.86	4.2 14%	7.8 -60%	5.4 -11%	4.6 5%	8.2 -69%	6.08 -25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	8.46	8.3 2%	15.87 -88%	9.7 -15%	7.6 10%	21.5 -154%	10.69 -26%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	5.3	4.7 11%	10.6 -100%	4.2 21%	3.8 28%	7.5 -42%	6.6 -25%
Gamma	2.281 ^96%	2.27 ^97%	2.246 ^98%	2.59 ^85%	2.11 ^104%	2.6 ^85%	2.305 ^95%
CCT	7770 ^84%	7394 ^88%	9715 ^67%	6734 ^97%	6952 ^93%	7581 ^86%	8399 ^77%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2404 Hz

≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2404 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2404 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9378 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.7 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	68348 Points ∼30%
Wiko View Max	31018 Points ∼13% -55%
Honor 7C	54731 Points ∼24% -20%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	63746 Points ∼28% -7%
LG K11	39898 Points ∼17% -42%
Xiaomi Black Shark	230642 Points ∼100% +237%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (59867 - 68348, n=17)	63396 Points ∼27% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (5600 - 293444, n=489)	87523 Points ∼38% +28%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	79099 Points ∼27%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	56497 Points ∼19% -29%
Wiko View Max	39765 Points ∼14% -50%
Honor 7C	71167 Points ∼25% -10%
LG K11	Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Black Shark	290397 Points ∼100% +267%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (65759 - 81789, n=6)	76418 Points ∼26% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 459850, n=285)	139075 Points ∼48% +76%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	4828 Points ∼58%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	4759 Points ∼57% -1%
Wiko View Max	Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 7C	4736 Points ∼57% -2%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	5035 Points ∼61% +4%
LG K11	3249 Points ∼39% -33%
Xiaomi Black Shark	8309 Points ∼100% +72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4626 - 5558, n=14)	4894 Points ∼59% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 11440, n=367)	5225 Points ∼63% +8%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	5716 Points ∼98%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	5393 Points ∼92% -6%
Honor 7C	5656 Points ∼97% -1%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	5656 Points ∼97% -1%
LG K11	4241 Points ∼72% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4596 - 7846, n=16)	5855 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 14439, n=538)	5652 Points ∼97% -1%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	753 Points ∼61%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	756 Points ∼61% 0%
Wiko View Max	10 Points ∼1% -99%
Honor 7C	10 Points ∼1% -99%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	679 Points ∼55% -10%
LG K11	679 Points ∼55% -10%
Xiaomi Black Shark	1243 Points ∼100% +65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (649 - 958, n=17)	772 Points ∼62% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=621)	751 Points ∼60% 0%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	999 Points ∼17%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	965 Points ∼17% -3%
Wiko View Max	149 Points ∼3% -85%
Honor 7C	955 Points ∼16% -4%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	986 Points ∼17% -1%
LG K11	487 Points ∼8% -51%
Xiaomi Black Shark	5846 Points ∼100% +485%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (968 - 1026, n=17)	1008 Points ∼17% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=621)	1986 Points ∼34% +99%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	996 Points ∼35%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	849 Points ∼30% -15%
Wiko View Max	683 Points ∼24% -31%
Honor 7C	1522 Points ∼53% +53%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	584 Points ∼20% -41%
LG K11	728 Points ∼25% -27%
Xiaomi Black Shark	2871 Points ∼100% +188%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (584 - 1553, n=17)	1018 Points ∼35% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 7500, n=621)	1487 Points ∼52% +49%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	3154 Points ∼44%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	2898 Points ∼41% -8%
Wiko View Max	1122 Points ∼16% -64%
Honor 7C	2665 Points ∼38% -16%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	2914 Points ∼41% -8%
LG K11	1599 Points ∼23% -49%
Xiaomi Black Shark	7105 Points ∼100% +125%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1960 - 3261, n=17)	2819 Points ∼40% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=621)	2910 Points ∼41% -8%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	1170 Points ∼34%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	1158 Points ∼33% -1%
Wiko View Max	182 Points ∼5% -84%
Honor 7C	442 Points ∼13% -62%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	1033 Points ∼30% -12%
LG K11	787 Points ∼23% -33%
Xiaomi Black Shark	3489 Points ∼100% +198%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1019 - 1362, n=17)	1206 Points ∼35% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 6097, n=621)	1460 Points ∼42% +25%

Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	3644 Points ∼27%
Wiko View Max	1125 Points ∼8% -69%
Honor 7C	2800 Points ∼21% -23%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	2628 Points ∼19% -28%
LG K11	1559 Points ∼11% -57%
Xiaomi Black Shark	13620 Points ∼100% +274%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (2628 - 3678, n=10)	3281 Points ∼24% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=317)	4676 Points ∼34% +28%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	4369 Points ∼52%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	3272 Points ∼39% -25%
Wiko View Max	1664 Points ∼20% -62%
Honor 7C	3913 Points ∼46% -10%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	4308 Points ∼51% -1%
LG K11	2259 Points ∼27% -48%
Xiaomi Black Shark	8453 Points ∼100% +93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3148 - 4396, n=12)	4171 Points ∼49% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=376)	4682 Points ∼55% +7%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	880 Points ∼36%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	741 Points ∼30% -16%
Wiko View Max	585 Points ∼24% -34%
Honor 7C	758 Points ∼31% -14%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	841 Points ∼35% -4%
LG K11	609 Points ∼25% -31%
Xiaomi Black Shark	2437 Points ∼100% +177%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (841 - 881, n=12)	866 Points ∼36% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4824, n=376)	1413 Points ∼58% +61%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	2104 Points ∼62%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	1521 Points ∼45% -28%
Wiko View Max	530 Points ∼16% -75%
Honor 7C	1817 Points ∼53% -14%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	2021 Points ∼59% -4%
LG K11	1233 Points ∼36% -41%
Xiaomi Black Shark	3408 Points ∼100% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1636 - 2177, n=17)	1958 Points ∼57% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (486 - 4320, n=454)	1849 Points ∼54% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	392 Points ∼8%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	367 Points ∼7% -6%
Wiko View Max	67 Points ∼1% -83%
Honor 7C	366 Points ∼7% -7%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	379 Points ∼7% -3%
LG K11	252 Points ∼5% -36%
Xiaomi Black Shark	5220 Points ∼100% +1232%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (372 - 397, n=17)	384 Points ∼7% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 6362, n=454)	1423 Points ∼27% +263%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	479 Points ∼10%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	441 Points ∼9% -8%
Wiko View Max	83 Points ∼2% -83%
Honor 7C	445 Points ∼10% -7%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	463 Points ∼10% -3%
LG K11	306 Points ∼7% -36%
Xiaomi Black Shark	4668 Points ∼100% +875%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (452 - 484, n=17)	467 Points ∼10% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 5734, n=455)	1372 Points ∼29% +186%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	2098 Points ∼61%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	1504 Points ∼44% -28%
Wiko View Max	524 Points ∼15% -75%
Honor 7C	1809 Points ∼53% -14%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	2016 Points ∼59% -4%
LG K11	1127 Points ∼33% -46%
Xiaomi Black Shark	3443 Points ∼100% +64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1631 - 2157, n=17)	1968 Points ∼57% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 4454, n=494)	1714 Points ∼50% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	743 Points ∼9%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	716 Points ∼9% -4%
Wiko View Max	108 Points ∼1% -85%
Honor 7C	713 Points ∼9% -4%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	723 Points ∼9% -3%
LG K11	381 Points ∼5% -49%
Xiaomi Black Shark	8312 Points ∼100% +1019%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (390 - 751, n=17)	710 Points ∼9% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 10008, n=493)	1844 Points ∼22% +148%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	867 Points ∼14%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	810 Points ∼13% -7%
Wiko View Max	131 Points ∼2% -85%
Honor 7C	824 Points ∼13% -5%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	843 Points ∼13% -3%
LG K11	447 Points ∼7% -48%
Xiaomi Black Shark	6324 Points ∼100% +629%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (476 - 876, n=17)	826 Points ∼13% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 7820, n=496)	1603 Points ∼25% +85%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	15870 Points ∼51%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	13596 Points ∼43% -14%
Wiko View Max	9264 Points ∼30% -42%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	15860 Points ∼51% 0%
LG K11	10285 Points ∼33% -35%
Xiaomi Black Shark	31384 Points ∼100% +98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (14195 - 16267, n=16)	15727 Points ∼50% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 45072, n=655)	13978 Points ∼45% -12%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	13369 Points ∼16%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	12347 Points ∼15% -8%
Wiko View Max	2892 Points ∼4% -78%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	13225 Points ∼16% -1%
LG K11	8177 Points ∼10% -39%
Xiaomi Black Shark	82423 Points ∼100% +517%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (7668 - 13491, n=16)	12957 Points ∼16% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 209204, n=653)	21146 Points ∼26% +58%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	13847 Points ∼23%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	12604 Points ∼21% -9%
Wiko View Max	3414 Points ∼6% -75%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	13732 Points ∼23% -1%
LG K11	8567 Points ∼14% -38%
Xiaomi Black Shark	60543 Points ∼100% +337%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (8541 - 14003, n=16)	13468 Points ∼22% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (662 - 97276, n=653)	17322 Points ∼29% +25%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	23 fps ∼15%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	21 fps ∼14% -9%
Wiko View Max	5 fps ∼3% -78%
Honor 7C	21 fps ∼14% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	23 fps ∼15% 0%
LG K11	13 fps ∼9% -43%
Xiaomi Black Shark	151 fps ∼100% +557%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (22 - 23, n=17)	22.9 fps ∼15% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=677)	36.9 fps ∼24% +60%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	21 fps ∼35%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	34 fps ∼57% +62%
Wiko View Max	8.2 fps ∼14% -61%
Honor 7C	34 fps ∼57% +62%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	19 fps ∼32% -10%
LG K11	22 fps ∼37% +5%
Xiaomi Black Shark	60 fps ∼100% +186%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (17 - 35, n=17)	22.9 fps ∼38% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 120, n=686)	27.7 fps ∼46% +32%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	9.9 fps ∼12%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	9.2 fps ∼11% -7%
Wiko View Max	2.2 fps ∼3% -78%
Honor 7C	9.2 fps ∼11% -7%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	9.8 fps ∼12% -1%
LG K11	5.3 fps ∼6% -46%
Xiaomi Black Shark	82 fps ∼100% +728%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 10, n=17)	9.43 fps ∼12% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 175, n=583)	21.1 fps ∼26% +113%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	9.4 fps ∼16%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	18 fps ∼31% +91%
Wiko View Max	4.5 fps ∼8% -52%
Honor 7C	18 fps ∼31% +91%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	10 fps ∼17% +6%
LG K11	11 fps ∼19% +17%
Xiaomi Black Shark	59 fps ∼100% +528%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (7.4 - 19, n=17)	10.6 fps ∼18% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 115, n=592)	19 fps ∼32% +102%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	6.5 fps ∼11%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	6 fps ∼10% -8%
Wiko View Max	1.3 fps ∼2% -80%
Honor 7C	6 fps ∼10% -8%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	6.4 fps ∼11% -2%
LG K11	3.5 fps ∼6% -46%
Xiaomi Black Shark	60 fps ∼100% +823%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.5 - 14, n=17)	6.66 fps ∼11% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=449)	17.3 fps ∼29% +166%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	6.1 fps ∼12%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	13 fps ∼25% +113%
Wiko View Max	2.8 fps ∼5% -54%
Honor 7C	13 fps ∼25% +113%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	6.9 fps ∼13% +13%
LG K11	8.6 fps ∼16% +41%
Xiaomi Black Shark	53 fps ∼100% +769%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 14, n=17)	6.52 fps ∼12% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=451)	16.4 fps ∼31% +169%

GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	3.5 fps ∼10%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	3.4 fps ∼10% -3%
Wiko View Max	0.76 fps ∼2% -78%
Honor 7C	3.3 fps ∼9% -6%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	3.5 fps ∼10% 0%
LG K11	1.9 fps ∼5% -46%
Xiaomi Black Shark	35 fps ∼100% +900%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.4 - 3.8, n=16)	3.52 fps ∼10% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 73, n=374)	11.8 fps ∼34% +237%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	3.6 fps ∼12%
HTC Desire 12 Plus	7 fps ∼23% +94%
Wiko View Max	1.3 fps ∼4% -64%
Honor 7C	7 fps ∼23% +94%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	3.8 fps ∼12% +6%
LG K11	4.3 fps ∼14% +19%
Xiaomi Black Shark	31 fps ∼100% +761%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 7.4, n=16)	3.98 fps ∼13% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 60, n=378)	10.6 fps ∼34% +194%

Legend

Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash

HTC Desire 12 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Wiko View Max Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Honor 7C Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto G5s Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash

LG K11 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 300, n=520)	40.5 Points ∼100% +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (21.3 - 31.8, n=17)	27.2 Points ∼67% +5%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62)	26.407 Points ∼65% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)	25.787 Points ∼64%
Honor 7C (Chrome 66)	22.35 Points ∼55% -13%
HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67)	22.158 Points ∼55% -14%
LG K11 (Chrome 67)	16.634 Points ∼41% -35%
Wiko View Max (Chrome 67)	15.571 Points ∼38% -40%
Xiaomi Black Shark	Points ∼0% -100%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)	13663 Points ∼100% +184%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49151, n=679)	6576 Points ∼48% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)	4808 Points ∼35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3781 - 4979, n=17)	4524 Points ∼33% -6%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62)	4456 Points ∼33% -7%
HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67)	3993 Points ∼29% -17%
Honor 7C (Chrome 66)	3470 Points ∼25% -28%
LG K11 (Chrome 67)	3397 Points ∼25% -29%
Wiko View Max (Chrome 67)	2781 Points ∼20% -42%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Wiko View Max (Chrome 67)	17558.2 ms * ∼100% -78%
LG K11 (Chrome 67)	14149.5 ms * ∼81% -43%
HTC Desire 12 Plus (Chrome 67)	11571.8 ms * ∼66% -17%
Honor 7C (Chrome 66)	11370 ms * ∼65% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (572 - 59466, n=704)	10649 ms * ∼61% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)	9879.9 ms * ∼56%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62)	9360.9 ms * ∼53% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (8028 - 12194, n=17)	9289 ms * ∼53% +6%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)	2287 ms * ∼13% +77%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)	246 Points ∼100% +126%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=328)	122 Points ∼50% +12%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Chrome 68)	109 Points ∼44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (60 - 113, n=12)	90.5 Points ∼37% -17%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro	HTC Desire 12 Plus	Wiko View Max	Honor 7C	Motorola Moto G5s Plus	LG K11	Xiaomi Black Shark	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-23%	-36%	-30%	-28%	-34%	77%	-21%	-34%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	62.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	59.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4%	60.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%	62.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	58.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%	61.11 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%		57.6 (11.2 - 74.7, n=98) -7%	49 (3.4 - 87.1, n=411) -21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	83.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	83.37 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	80.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%	83.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	79.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%	82.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%		76.3 (21.1 - 87.2, n=98) -9%	67.2 (8.1 - 96.5, n=411) -20%
Random Write 4KB	72.6	9.16 -87%	11.87 -84%	10 -86%	44.89 -38%	13.16 -82%	114.1 57%	24 (3.4 - 88.2, n=112) -67%	21.3 (0.14 - 250, n=730) -71%
Random Read 4KB	66.87	65.67 -2%	31.65 -53%	30 -55%	37.94 -43%	45.8 -32%	127.2 90%	54.3 (11.4 - 149, n=112) -19%	46.1 (1.59 - 196, n=730) -31%
Sequential Write 256KB	212.87	135.55 -36%	96.95 -54%	115 -46%	75.7 -64%	48.32 -77%	199.6 -6%	171 (40 - 246, n=112) -20%	94.6 (2.99 - 590, n=730) -56%
Sequential Read 256KB	278.66	252.8 -9%	229.39 -18%	297 7%	237.44 -15%	252.96 -9%	741.5 166%	273 (95.6 - 704, n=112) -2%	266 (12.1 - 1504, n=730) -5%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Inställningar	Värde
	high	30 fps

Dead Trigger 2
	Inställningar	Värde
	high	30 fps

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


40.4 °C	37.7 °C	37 °C
40.6 °C	37.9 °C	37.3 °C
40.3 °C	37.9 °C	37.2 °C

Max: 40.6 °C
Medel: 38.5 °C


37.7 °C	38.6 °C	39.2 °C
37.8 °C	38.6 °C	39.5 °C
37.8 °C	38.3 °C	39.1 °C

Max: 39.5 °C
Medel: 38.5 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 42.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 7C audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0 / 0.5 Watt
Låg belastning	1.3 / 2.1 / 3.7 Watt
Hög belastning	4.5 / 6 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro 4000 mAh	HTC Desire 12 Plus 2965 mAh	Wiko View Max 4000 mAh	Honor 7C 3000 mAh	Motorola Moto G5s Plus 3000 mAh	LG K11 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Black Shark 4000 mAh
Power Consumption		30%	-66%	33%	28%	28%	6%
Idle Minimum *	1.3	0.68 48%	2.8 -115%	0.6 54%	0.83 36%	0.57 56%	0.8 38%
Idle Average *	2.1	2.05 2%	3.5 -67%	2.16 -3%	1.67 20%	1.48 30%	1.5 29%
Idle Maximum *	3.7	2.12 43%	6.3 -70%	2.24 39%	1.85 50%	1.54 58%	2.3 38%
Load Average *	4.5	3 33%	7 -56%	2.59 42%	3.47 23%	4.56 -1%	4.8 -7%
Load Maximum *	6	4.57 24%	7.4 -23%	4.11 31%	5.41 10%	6.16 -3%	10.1 -68%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		29tim 25min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		14tim 28min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		20tim 14min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		4tim 53min

	Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro 4000 mAh	HTC Desire 12 Plus 2965 mAh	Wiko View Max 4000 mAh	Honor 7C 3000 mAh	Motorola Moto G5s Plus 3000 mAh	LG K11 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Black Shark 4000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-37%	22%	-20%	13%	-15%	-18%
Reader / Idle	1765				1496 -15%		1753 -1%
H.264	1214						747 -38%
WiFi v1.3	868	545 -37%	1056 22%	693 -20%	974 12%	741 -15%	711 -18%
Load	293				419 43%		253 -14%

För

+ trippelt SIM-tråg

+ lång batteritid

+ elegant IPS-skärm

+ snabb eMMC-lagring

+ snabb ansiktsupplåsning + fingeravtrycksläsare

+ tillräcklig prestanda...

Emot

- ...men "gammal" SoC

- IPS-skärmens färgåtergivning

- ingen Typ C

- tillgängligheten - Kinesisk version

- anslutbarhet - Kinesisk version

Recenseras: Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro. Recensionsex från tradingshenzhen.com.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Redmi 6 Pro är en ganska välgjord smartphone som hör hemma i det billigare mittenskiktet. Släppet av Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite kommer introducera en seriös ny rival till den lokala smartphone-konkurrensen i prisskiktet under 2.000 kronor.

Redmi 6 Pro erbjuder mycket till ett lågt pris – men i Tyskland kan vi bara rekommendera ett köp av Android One-versionen.

Denna telefon från Xiaomi har en ljusstark IPS-skärm med väldigt stabila betraktningsvinklar. Dessutom har den en tilltalande kamera, snabb eMMC-lagring, lång batteritid, ett trippeltråg för dubbla SIM-kort och biometriska upplåsningsfunktioner som fungerar utmärkt. Vidare avslöjar varken dess systemprestanda, dess utseende eller hur den känns överhuvudtaget att denna smartphone bara kostar runt 1.800 kronor.

Monohögtalaren på enhetens undersida övertygade dock inte med sin kvalitet. Xiaomi kunde även ha installerat en mer uppdaterad processor i 2018 års modell. Lokal användning begränsas av att så få LTE-band stöds hos den Kinesiska versionen.

Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro - 2018-08-1408/14/2018 v6^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Design

81%

Tangentbord

65 / 75 → 87%

Mus

89%

Anslutningar

40 / 60 → 67%

Vikt

90%

Batteri

99%

Skärm

86%

Spelprestanda

28 / 63 → 45%

Programprestanda

53 / 70 → 75%

Temperatur

88%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

56 / 91 → 62%

Camera

74%

Medel

73%

84%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Test: Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro (Mi A2 Lite) Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Xiaomi Redmi 6 Pro audio analysis

Honor 7C audio analysis

För

Emot

Pricecompare