Notebookcheck

Test: UMIDIGI A1 Pro Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Wimmer (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 06/26/2018

En billig start. UMIDIGI A1 Pro verkar vara ett riktigt kap. Enheten är smart designad, har en dualkamera och stödjer 5 Ghz WiFi-nätverk - saker vi inte hade förväntat oss från en enhet för 1.200 kronor. I den här recensionen får du reda på huruvida UMIDIGI A1 Pro lever upp till förväntningarna och i vilken utsträckning enheten är lämplig för dagligt bruk.

Umidigi A1 Pro
Processor
Mediatek MT6739
Grafikkort
PowerVR GE8100
Minne
3072 MB 
Skärm
5.5 tum 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixlar 293 PPI, kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.7 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD-kort upp till 256 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, Kompass, Ljussensor, Fingeravtrycksläsare, USB-C, USB-OTG
Nätverk
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B19/​B20/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.9 x 145.1 x 69.1
Batteri
11.8 Wh, 3150 mAh
Operativsystem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 13 MP, f/2.0, Kontrast-Autofokus (AF), dubbel LED-blixt, video i upp till 1080p
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix 5 MP, f/​2.4, skärpedjup (DOF)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare på enhetens undersida, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Quick Charge-nätadapter, USB-kabel, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless
Vikt
173 g, Strömförsörjning: 66 g
Pris
119 Kr

 

UMIDIGI A1 Pro
UMIDIGI A1 Pro
UMIDIGI A1 Pro
UMIDIGI A1 Pro
UMIDIGI A1 Pro

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi A1
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s ∼100% +325%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=259)
186 MBit/s ∼78% +234%
Sony Xperia L1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
92.2 MBit/s ∼39% +66%
Umidigi A1 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s ∼24%
Honor 6X
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.6 MBit/s ∼23% -2%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
42.1 MBit/s ∼18% -24%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi A1
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s ∼100% +325%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=259)
182 MBit/s ∼77% +226%
Sony Xperia L1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
88.6 MBit/s ∼37% +59%
Honor 6X
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash
57.9 MBit/s ∼24% +4%
Umidigi A1 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.8 MBit/s ∼24%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.8 MBit/s ∼20% -16%
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Skogsområde
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Skogsområde
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Bro
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 – Bro
GPS-test: UMIDIGI A1 Pro - Översikt
GPS-test: UMIDIGI A1 Pro - Översikt
GPS-test: UMIDIGI A1 Pro – Skogsområde
GPS-test: UMIDIGI A1 Pro – Skogsområde
GPS-test: UMIDIGI A1 Pro – Bro
GPS-test: UMIDIGI A1 Pro – Bro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
581
cd/m²
585
cd/m²
542
cd/m²
590
cd/m²
594
cd/m²
544
cd/m²
602
cd/m²
575
cd/m²
518
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 602 cd/m² Medel: 570.1 cd/m² Minimum: 23.3 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 598 cd/m²
Kontrast: 2700:1 (Svärta: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.63 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 9.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
96.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Umidigi A1 Pro
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Sony Xperia L1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Honor 6X
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Xiaomi Mi A1
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Screen
-16%
-17%
-2%
-6%
Brightness middle
594
479
-19%
547
-8%
503
-15%
425
-28%
Brightness
570
478
-16%
540
-5%
478
-16%
425
-25%
Brightness Distribution
86
94
9%
94
9%
88
2%
93
8%
Black Level *
0.22
0.58
-164%
0.57
-159%
0.37
-68%
0.37
-68%
Contrast
2700
826
-69%
960
-64%
1359
-50%
1149
-57%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.63
4.5
32%
5.1
23%
3.92
41%
4.7
29%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
13.99
7.5
46%
9.1
35%
7.86
44%
8.3
41%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
9.2
4.1
55%
6.2
33%
4.9
47%
4.6
50%
Gamma
2.24 107%
2.03 118%
2.09 115%
2.223 108%
2.17 111%
CCT
8663 75%
7139 91%
6546 99%
7884 82%
7445 87%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8813 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.3 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
36073 Points ∼51%
Sony Xperia L1
37495 Points ∼53% +4%
Honor 6X
56764 Points ∼80% +57%
Xiaomi Mi A1
63101 Points ∼89% +75%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
30619 Points ∼43% -15%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (31010 - 38060, n=8)
34493 Points ∼49% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 230642, n=350)
70775 Points ∼100% +96%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
45868 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi A1
77161 Points ∼77% +68%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (26874 - 46435, n=9)
41779 Points ∼41% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 290397, n=127)
100740 Points ∼100% +120%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
3159 Points ∼65%
Sony Xperia L1
3237 Points ∼66% +2%
Xiaomi Mi A1
4895 Points ∼100% +55%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
2768 Points ∼57% -12%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2814 - 3320, n=9)
2655 Points ∼54% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (2814 - 8601, n=214)
4398 Points ∼90% +39%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
4330 Points ∼76%
Sony Xperia L1
4285 Points ∼75% -1%
Honor 6X
4383 Points ∼77% +1%
Xiaomi Mi A1
5721 Points ∼100% +32%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3624 Points ∼63% -16%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (0 - 4711, n=7)
3112 Points ∼54% -28%
Average of class Smartphone (5960 - 10264, n=378)
4665 Points ∼82% +8%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
10 Points ∼1%
Sony Xperia L1
743 Points ∼83% +7330%
Honor 6X
720 Points ∼80% +7100%
Xiaomi Mi A1
895 Points ∼100% +8850%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
620 Points ∼69% +6100%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (7 - 591, n=9)
74.1 Points ∼8% +641%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=453)
666 Points ∼74% +6560%
Graphics (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
184 Points ∼12%
Sony Xperia L1
386 Points ∼26% +110%
Honor 6X
819 Points ∼54% +345%
Xiaomi Mi A1
1012 Points ∼67% +450%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
208 Points ∼14% +13%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (18 - 188, n=9)
155 Points ∼10% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=453)
1510 Points ∼100% +721%
Memory (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
802 Points ∼45%
Sony Xperia L1
798 Points ∼45% 0%
Honor 6X
1779 Points ∼100% +122%
Xiaomi Mi A1
881 Points ∼50% +10%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
591 Points ∼33% -26%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (472 - 1034, n=9)
808 Points ∼45% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=453)
1124 Points ∼63% +40%
System (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
1318 Points ∼41%
Sony Xperia L1
1338 Points ∼42% +2%
Honor 6X
2721 Points ∼85% +106%
Xiaomi Mi A1
3187 Points ∼100% +142%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1086 Points ∼34% -18%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1113 - 1526, n=9)
1324 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=453)
2257 Points ∼71% +71%
Overall (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
208 Points ∼16%
Sony Xperia L1
744 Points ∼57% +258%
Honor 6X
1300 Points ∼100% +525%
Xiaomi Mi A1
1263 Points ∼97% +507%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
536 Points ∼41% +158%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (165 - 637, n=9)
248 Points ∼19% +19%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 4308, n=457)
1131 Points ∼87% +444%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
1450 Points ∼38%
Sony Xperia L1
1241 Points ∼32% -14%
Xiaomi Mi A1
3678 Points ∼95% +154%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
952 Points ∼25% -34%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1125 - 1451, n=8)
1131 Points ∼29% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14417, n=153)
3853 Points ∼100% +166%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
1852 Points ∼42%
Sony Xperia L1
1875 Points ∼43% +1%
Xiaomi Mi A1
4396 Points ∼100% +137%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1562 Points ∼36% -16%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1664 - 1852, n=8)
1556 Points ∼35% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 10558, n=200)
3952 Points ∼90% +113%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
665 Points ∼57%
Sony Xperia L1
674 Points ∼58% +1%
Xiaomi Mi A1
881 Points ∼76% +32%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
556 Points ∼48% -16%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (585 - 665, n=8)
558 Points ∼48% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4265, n=201)
1159 Points ∼100% +74%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
531 Points ∼26%
Sony Xperia L1
968 Points ∼47% +82%
Honor 6X
1440 Points ∼70% +171%
Xiaomi Mi A1
2070 Points ∼100% +290%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
783 Points ∼38% +47%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (500 - 589, n=9)
555 Points ∼27% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (500 - 3669, n=303)
1544 Points ∼75% +191%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
88 Points ∼8%
Sony Xperia L1
149 Points ∼14% +69%
Honor 6X
318 Points ∼30% +261%
Xiaomi Mi A1
388 Points ∼37% +341%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
79 Points ∼8% -10%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (67 - 92, n=9)
79.4 Points ∼8% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 5220, n=303)
1049 Points ∼100% +1092%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
108 Points ∼11%
Sony Xperia L1
184 Points ∼18% +70%
Honor 6X
385 Points ∼38% +256%
Xiaomi Mi A1
473 Points ∼47% +338%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
99 Points ∼10% -8%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (83 - 113, n=9)
98.1 Points ∼10% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (87 - 4734, n=311)
1006 Points ∼100% +831%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
537 Points ∼26%
Sony Xperia L1
939 Points ∼45% +75%
Honor 6X
1433 Points ∼69% +167%
Xiaomi Mi A1
2079 Points ∼100% +287%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
753 Points ∼36% +40%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (474 - 620, n=9)
556 Points ∼27% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (474 - 3642, n=334)
1449 Points ∼70% +170%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
140 Points ∼10%
Sony Xperia L1
238 Points ∼17% +70%
Honor 6X
468 Points ∼33% +234%
Xiaomi Mi A1
390 Points ∼27% +179%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
133 Points ∼9% -5%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (102 - 148, n=9)
123 Points ∼9% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (107 - 8312, n=334)
1423 Points ∼100% +916%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
168 Points ∼14%
Sony Xperia L1
285 Points ∼23% +70%
Honor 6X
550 Points ∼45% +227%
Xiaomi Mi A1
476 Points ∼39% +183%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
163 Points ∼13% -3%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (120 - 178, n=9)
148 Points ∼12% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (120 - 6378, n=342)
1223 Points ∼100% +628%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
10767 Points ∼68%
Honor 6X
13535 Points ∼86%
Honor 6X
13535 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi A1
15816 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
8390 Points ∼53%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
8390 Points ∼53%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (8269 - 10197, n=8)
9488 Points ∼60%
Average of class Smartphone (8065 - 36762, n=489)
12157 Points ∼77%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
6015 Points ∼39%
Honor 6X
11353 Points ∼73%
Honor 6X
11353 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Mi A1
13314 Points ∼85%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3183 Points ∼20%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3183 Points ∼20%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2891 - 4346, n=8)
3421 Points ∼22%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 113380, n=489)
15596 Points ∼100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia L1
6669 Points ∼48%
Honor 6X
11775 Points ∼85%
Honor 6X
11775 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi A1
13799 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3692 Points ∼27%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3692 Points ∼27%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (3410 - 4203, n=8)
3896 Points ∼28%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 64405, n=490)
13491 Points ∼98%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
6 fps ∼22%
Sony Xperia L1
11 fps ∼40% +83%
Honor 6X
18 fps ∼66% +200%
Xiaomi Mi A1
23 fps ∼84% +283%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
6 fps ∼22% 0%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (4.9 - 6.1, n=9)
5.63 fps ∼21% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=517)
27.4 fps ∼100% +357%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
9.7 fps ∼41%
Sony Xperia L1
19 fps ∼81% +96%
Honor 6X
19 fps ∼81% +96%
Xiaomi Mi A1
22 fps ∼93% +127%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
11 fps ∼47% +13%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (8.2 - 10, n=9)
9.29 fps ∼39% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=520)
23.6 fps ∼100% +143%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
2.7 fps ∼19%
Sony Xperia L1
4.1 fps ∼28% +52%
Honor 6X
4.6 fps ∼32% +70%
Xiaomi Mi A1
9.8 fps ∼68% +263%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
2.2 fps ∼15% -19%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2.2 - 2.8, n=9)
2.54 fps ∼18% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 88.2, n=440)
14.5 fps ∼100% +437%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
5.4 fps ∼37%
Sony Xperia L1
8.8 fps ∼60% +63%
Honor 6X
8.5 fps ∼58% +57%
Xiaomi Mi A1
9.5 fps ∼65% +76%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
4.8 fps ∼33% -11%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (4.4 - 5.7, n=9)
5.18 fps ∼35% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (4.4 - 115, n=442)
14.6 fps ∼100% +170%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
1.6 fps ∼13%
Sony Xperia L1
2.6 fps ∼21% +63%
Honor 6X
2.5 fps ∼20% +56%
Xiaomi Mi A1
6.4 fps ∼51% +300%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1.4 fps ∼11% -12%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1.3 - 1.6, n=9)
1.5 fps ∼12% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 60, n=304)
12.5 fps ∼100% +681%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
3.3 fps ∼26%
Sony Xperia L1
6.3 fps ∼50% +91%
Honor 6X
4.9 fps ∼39% +48%
Xiaomi Mi A1
6.3 fps ∼50% +91%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3.4 fps ∼27% +3%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2.6 - 3.6, n=9)
3.22 fps ∼26% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=306)
12.6 fps ∼100% +282%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
0.9 fps ∼11%
Honor 6X
2.8 fps ∼33% +211%
Xiaomi Mi A1
3.6 fps ∼42% +300%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (0.72 - 0.91, n=9)
0.846 fps ∼10% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 35, n=236)
8.57 fps ∼100% +852%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi A1 Pro
1.4 fps ∼18%
Honor 6X
3 fps ∼38% +114%
Xiaomi Mi A1
3.5 fps ∼45% +150%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (1.1 - 1.7, n=9)
1.456 fps ∼19% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 50, n=239)
7.84 fps ∼100% +460%

Legend

 
Umidigi A1 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia L1 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 6X HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi A1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 224, n=372)
33.4 Points ∼100% +87%
Honor 6X (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
26.464 Points ∼79% +48%
Xiaomi Mi A1
26.077 Points ∼78% +46%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
17.857 Points ∼53%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
17.372 Points ∼52% -3%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (15.4 - 18.1, n=9)
16.8 Points ∼50% -6%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
14.55 Points ∼44% -19%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=508)
4996 Points ∼100% +57%
Xiaomi Mi A1
4756 Points ∼95% +49%
Honor 6X (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
4199 Points ∼84% +32%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
3191 Points ∼64%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2692 - 3202, n=9)
3006 Points ∼60% -6%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
2684 Points ∼54% -16%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
2273 Points ∼45% -29%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
17405 ms * ∼100% -11%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (15713 - 18154, n=9)
16863 ms * ∼97% -7%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
15718 ms * ∼90%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
12506.5 ms * ∼72% +20%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=527)
11914 ms * ∼68% +24%
Xiaomi Mi A1
9867.5 ms * ∼57% +37%
Honor 6X (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
9373.3 ms * ∼54% +40%

* ... smaller is better

Umidigi A1 ProSony Xperia L1Honor 6XXiaomi Mi A1Lenovo Moto E4 PlusAverage 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-41%
62%
82%
14%
-30%
8%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
58.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
26.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-55%
34.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-41%
57.9
-2%
46.6
-21%
37.1 (6.38 - 65.4, n=106)
-37%
43.9 (3.4 - 87.1, n=284)
-25%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
37.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-53%
52.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-36%
83.62
3%
66.3
-18%
55.4 (10.8 - 87.7, n=106)
-32%
62.3 (8.2 - 96.5, n=284)
-23%
Random Write 4KB
10.2
5.9
-42%
45.05
342%
7.19
-30%
29.4
188%
7.3 (0.49 - 37.9, n=221)
-28%
13.6 (0.14 - 164, n=566)
33%
Random Read 4KB
29.6
13.6
-54%
39.55
34%
78.05
164%
19.15
-35%
19.8 (2.49 - 61.7, n=221)
-33%
34.9 (1.59 - 173, n=566)
18%
Sequential Write 256KB
44.4
40.2
-9%
73.85
66%
202.45
356%
42
-5%
41.1 (8.74 - 97.6, n=221)
-7%
73.2 (2.99 - 228, n=566)
65%
Sequential Read 256KB
269.2
181.9
-32%
283.37
5%
277.43
3%
194.4
-28%
157 (9.66 - 294, n=221)
-42%
214 (12.1 - 832, n=566)
-21%
Hög belastning
 39.7 °C34.7 °C33 °C 
 38.9 °C34.5 °C33.6 °C 
 37.9 °C34.1 °C33.5 °C 
Max: 39.7 °C
Medel: 35.5 °C
31.2 °C34.5 °C39.6 °C
31.6 °C34.5 °C39.1 °C
32.2 °C33.9 °C36.2 °C
Max: 39.6 °C
Medel: 34.8 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  50.1 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.642.52538.438.53134.237.94037.332.7503029.36326.626.88023.222.210021.220.81252122.816016.31820016.624.625015.827.831513.534.340012.242.45001244.663011.750.180010.556.110009.660.512509.5631600963.620008.562.925008.563.331508.364.340008.266.150008.16963008.162.880008.157.9100008.259.9125008.346.2160008.229.7SPL21.959.975.4N0.31231.8median 9.5Umidigi A1 Promedian 56.1Delta2.81531.632.925.43325.333.532.932.933.635.331.638.328.428.5272820.833.42228.421.330.820.842.521.248.219.456.819.563.417.768.717.974.617.876.617.376.817.474.616.776.117.273.918.27417.979.617.682.317.784.217.877.417.973.518.172.218.2693089.41.379.4median 17.9Sony Xperia L1median 73.51.312.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Umidigi A1 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Sony Xperia L1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.5 / 1.6 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.8 / 2.3 / 3.2 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.7 / 6 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Umidigi A1 Pro
3150 mAh
Sony Xperia L1
2620 mAh
Honor 6X
3340 mAh
Xiaomi Mi A1
3080 mAh
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6739
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
10%
30%
-20%
35%
1%
27%
Idle Minimum *
1.8
0.89
51%
0.82
54%
2.2
-22%
0.89
51%
1.706 (1.13 - 2.8, n=9)
5%
0.872 (0.2 - 3.4, n=587)
52%
Idle Average *
2.3
2.05
11%
2
13%
2.8
-22%
1.87
19%
2.31 (1.7 - 3.5, n=9)
-0%
1.703 (0.6 - 6.2, n=586)
26%
Idle Maximum *
3.2
2.18
32%
2.03
37%
3.4
-6%
1.98
38%
3.15 (2 - 6.3, n=9)
2%
1.968 (0.74 - 6.6, n=587)
38%
Load Average *
4.7
6.02
-28%
3.34
29%
6.2
-32%
3.04
35%
4.93 (2.8 - 7, n=9)
-5%
3.99 (0.8 - 10.8, n=581)
15%
Load Maximum *
6
6.94
-16%
4.92
18%
7.2
-20%
4.01
33%
5.78 (3.5 - 7.4, n=9)
4%
5.63 (1.2 - 14.2, n=581)
6%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10tim 08min
Umidigi A1 Pro
3150 mAh
Sony Xperia L1
2620 mAh
Honor 6X
3340 mAh
Xiaomi Mi A1
3080 mAh
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-7%
57%
4%
30%
Reader / Idle
1398
2250
WiFi v1.3
608
567
-7%
957
57%
633
4%
788
30%
Load
223
375
H.264
656
885

För

+ tjusigt och stabilt hölje
+ 5 GHz WiFi
+ många LTE-frekvenser
+ snabbladdning (Quick Charge)
+ aktuell version av Android
+ exakt GPS
+ bra samtalskvalitet
+ dedikerad microSD-kortplats
+ Dual-SIM
+ ljusstark skärm med bra kontrastförhållande

Emot

- relativt hög energiförbrukning
- skärmen har en stark blå ton
- dålig kamera
- ljussensorn sätter ibland skärmens ljusstyrka för lågt
Recension av UMIDIGI A1 Pro.
Recension av UMIDIGI A1 Pro.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

UMIDIGI A1 Pro är en smartphone med många överraskningar. Bortsett från det fashionabla och robusta höljet så har A1 Pro en ljusstark skärm, snabbladdning (Quick Charge) och stöd för både 5 GHz WiFi och fjorton LTE-band. Dessa funktioner kompletteras av ett modernt 2:1-förhållande, skaplig samtalskvalitet och acceptabel batteritid. Vi hade inte förväntat oss allt detta i en telefon för 1.200 kronor.

UMIDIGI A1 Pro är en stark smartphone till ett överkompligt pris. Även om prestandan och kameran ligger på instegsnivå så går A1 Pro bortom förväntningarna med sin snabba laddning och ljusstarka skärm.

A1 Pro är ett riktigt kap. Det finns kompromisser rörande kamerans kvalitet och skärmens färgnoggrannhet, men du får kämpa för att hitta en bättre smartphone än UMIDIGI A1 Pro som erbjuder så mycket för så lite.

Umidigi A1 Pro - 06/22/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Design
88%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
88%
Anslutningar
41 / 60 → 69%
Vikt
90%
Batteri
93%
Skärm
83%
Spelprestanda
7 / 63 → 11%
Programprestanda
35 / 70 → 50%
Temperatur
90%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Camera
62%
Medel
69%
80%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: UMIDIGI A1 Pro Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Florian Wimmer, 2018-06-26 (Update: 2018-06-27)