Notebookcheck

Test: Xiaomi Redmi 8 - Xiaomis budgettelefon sätter en ny standard (Sammanfattning)

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 01/26/2020

Evolution av Redmi 8. Vid vardagsanvändning visar sig oväntat stora skillnader mellan Redmi 8 och dess syskon Redmi 8A. Nedan kommer vi att diskutera på vilka områden den billiga Redmi 8 är bättre än Redmi 8A och varför det rekommenderade priset på ca 1.150 kronor är prisvärt.

Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Redmi Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
6.22 tum 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixlar 270 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS LCD, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 49 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD-kort på upp till 512 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Närhetssensor, Kompass, USB Typ C, Miracast, status-LED, FM-radio, IR-sändare
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B20, B38, B40., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.4 x 156.5 x 75.4
Batteri
5000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix Dubbel: 12 MP (f/1.8, 1/2.55", 1.4 µm) + 2 MP, Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix , f/2.0, 1.12 µm
Övrigt
Högtalare: Mono, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Laddare, USB-C kabel, SIM-verktyg, Hölje, MIUI 11, 12 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: Kropp - 1.48 W/kg, Huvud - 0.231 W/kg. LTE Cat 4/5 (150/75 Mbps), fanless
Vikt
188 g, Strömförsörjning: 70 g
Pris
140 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Enhetsjämförelse

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
76 %
01/2020
Xiaomi Redmi 8
SD 439, Adreno 505
188 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.22"1520x720
75 %
11/2019
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
SD 439, Adreno 505
188 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.22"1520x720
81 %
04/2019
Nokia 4.2
SD 439, Adreno 505
161 g32 GB eMMC Flash5.71"1520x720
76 %
07/2019
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2
141 g32 GB eMMC Flash5.8"1560x720
75 %
10/2019
LG K50
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
170 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.26"1520x720
81 %
06/2019
Wiko View 3
Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320
178 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.26"1520x720
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Xiaomi Redmi 8

Storleksjämförelse

161.3 mm 77 mm 8.7 mm 170 g159 mm 76.5 mm 8.2 mm 178 g156.5 mm 75.4 mm 9.4 mm 188 g156.5 mm 75.4 mm 9.4 mm 188 g148.95 mm 71.3 mm 8.39 mm 161 g147.4 mm 69.7 mm 8.4 mm 141 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1014, n=504)
244 MBit/s ∼100% +334%
Wiko View 3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash
70 (min: 57, max: 83) MBit/s ∼29% +25%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
60 (min: 47, max: 67) MBit/s ∼25% +7%
LG K50
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
60 (min: 53, max: 57) MBit/s ∼25% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Adreno 505, SD 439, 64 GB eMMC Flash
56.2 (min: 47, max: 58) MBit/s ∼23%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Adreno 505, SD 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
56 (min: 54, max: 58) MBit/s ∼23% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, SD 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 (min: 35, max: 52) MBit/s ∼22% -6%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 966, n=504)
227 MBit/s ∼100% +352%
LG K50
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.9 (min: 51, max: 59) MBit/s ∼25% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Adreno 505, SD 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.3 (min: 49, max: 60) MBit/s ∼24% +10%
Wiko View 3
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55 (min: 47, max: 62) MBit/s ∼24% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Adreno 505, SD 439, 64 GB eMMC Flash
50.2 (min: 24, max: 56) MBit/s ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39.7 (min: 23, max: 50) MBit/s ∼17% -21%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, SD 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
35.2 (min: 24, max: 40) MBit/s ∼16% -30%
0102030405060Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø53.3 (47-58)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø49.4 (24-56)
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cykeltur runt en sjö
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cykeltur runt en sjö
GPS-test: Xiaomi Redmi 8 - Översikt
GPS-test: Xiaomi Redmi 8 - Översikt
GPS-test: Xiaomi Redmi 8 - Loop
GPS-test: Xiaomi Redmi 8 - Loop
GPS-test: Xiaomi Redmi 8 - Cykeltur runt en sjö
GPS-test: Xiaomi Redmi 8 - Cykeltur runt en sjö
Automatiskt läge
Automatiskt läge
Porträttläge
Porträttläge
Automatiskt läge
Automatiskt läge med AI aktiverat

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
ColorChecker
26.7 ∆E
49.8 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
60.2 ∆E
50.2 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
61.3 ∆E
61.3 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
73.3 ∆E
38 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
81 ∆E
67.9 ∆E
49.1 ∆E
34.6 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 8: 43.38 ∆E min: 12.22 - max: 80.98 ∆E
ColorChecker
7.2 ∆E
7 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 8: 5.14 ∆E min: 1.4 - max: 8.14 ∆E
Foto av vår testkarta
Foto av vår testkarta
Testkartan i detalj
Foto av testkartan taget vid 1 lux
470
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
524
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
539
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 554 cd/m² Medel: 516 cd/m² Minimum: 1.34 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 554 cd/m²
Kontrast: 2308:1 (Svärta: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
95.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17
Xiaomi Redmi 8
IPS LCD, 1520x720, 6.22
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
IPS, 1520x720, 6.22
Nokia 4.2
IPS, 1520x720, 5.71
Samsung Galaxy A20e
IPS, 1560x720, 5.8
LG K50
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Wiko View 3
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Screen
-47%
-54%
-82%
-45%
-28%
Brightness middle
554
441
-20%
445
-20%
475
-14%
489
-12%
574
4%
Brightness
516
421
-18%
424
-18%
473
-8%
453
-12%
552
7%
Brightness Distribution
85
89
5%
91
7%
93
9%
85
0%
91
7%
Black Level *
0.24
0.38
-58%
0.26
-8%
0.35
-46%
0.42
-75%
0.19
21%
Contrast
2308
1161
-50%
1712
-26%
1357
-41%
1164
-50%
3021
31%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.6
4.46
-72%
5.9
-127%
6.8
-162%
4.75
-83%
5.5
-112%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.9
8.01
-63%
9.3
-90%
13.4
-173%
7.75
-58%
9.5
-94%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.7
5.4
-100%
6.8
-152%
8.7
-222%
4.6
-70%
5
-85%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.146 103%
2.2 100%
2.33 94%
2.164 102%
2.1 105%
CCT
6814 95%
7901 82%
8443 77%
9385 69%
7510 87%
7610 85%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17159 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.8 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
68.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 33.2 ms rise
↘ 35.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).
Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
Points ∼0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
Points ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (143 - 3794, n=44)
1380 Points ∼100%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
252 Points ∼14%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
272 Points ∼15% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (252 - 272, n=3)
265 Points ∼15% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=52)
1756 Points ∼100% +597%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
812 Points ∼44%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
809 Points ∼44% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (809 - 836, n=3)
819 Points ∼45% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=64)
1831 Points ∼100% +125%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
176 Points ∼34%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
177 Points ∼34% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (176 - 177, n=3)
177 Points ∼34% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 1344, n=64)
522 Points ∼100% +197%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
4664 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
4708 Points ∼85% +1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4623 Points ∼84% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
5305 Points ∼96% +14%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4052 Points ∼73% -13%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
5135 Points ∼93% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (4412 - 4791, n=6)
4632 Points ∼84% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=438)
5517 Points ∼100% +18%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
6076 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
6026 Points ∼87% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6228 Points ∼90% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6902 Points ∼100% +14%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4635 Points ∼67% -24%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6912 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (5880 - 6228, n=6)
6095 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=601)
6014 Points ∼87% -1%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
2118 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
2135 Points ∼80% +1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2172 Points ∼81% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
2018 Points ∼76% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (2118 - 2172, n=6)
2139 Points ∼80% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=105)
2672 Points ∼100% +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
411 Points ∼15%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
406 Points ∼15% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
401 Points ∼14% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
498 Points ∼18% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (401 - 412, n=6)
407 Points ∼15% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=105)
2795 Points ∼100% +580%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
501 Points ∼20%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
495 Points ∼20% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
490 Points ∼19% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
598 Points ∼24% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (490 - 502, n=6)
496 Points ∼20% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=105)
2532 Points ∼100% +405%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1582 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1627 Points ∼80% +3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1500 Points ∼73% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1628 Points ∼80% +3%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
936 Points ∼46% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1500 - 1657, n=6)
1597 Points ∼78% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=444)
2043 Points ∼100% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
432 Points ∼23%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
418 Points ∼22% -3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
413 Points ∼22% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
440 Points ∼23% +2%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
434 Points ∼23% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (413 - 432, n=6)
420 Points ∼22% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9345, n=444)
1882 Points ∼100% +336%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
505 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
501 Points ∼29% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
492 Points ∼28% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
525 Points ∼30% +4%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
493 Points ∼28% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (492 - 505, n=6)
500 Points ∼29% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 7982, n=445)
1748 Points ∼100% +246%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1602 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1618 Points ∼83% +1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1516 Points ∼78% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1624 Points ∼83% +1%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
936 Points ∼48% -42%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
975 Points ∼50% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1516 - 1618, n=6)
1588 Points ∼81% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5209, n=473)
1954 Points ∼100% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
735 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
725 Points ∼29% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
712 Points ∼29% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
659 Points ∼26% -10%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
701 Points ∼28% -5%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
452 Points ∼18% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (712 - 735, n=6)
727 Points ∼29% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=473)
2498 Points ∼100% +240%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
835 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
826 Points ∼39% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
807 Points ∼38% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
759 Points ∼36% -9%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
742 Points ∼35% -11%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
513 Points ∼24% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (807 - 835, n=6)
826 Points ∼39% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=473)
2105 Points ∼100% +152%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1598 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1657 Points ∼85% +4%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1575 Points ∼81% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1630 Points ∼84% +2%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
897 Points ∼46% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1575 - 1657, n=6)
1613 Points ∼83% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 4909, n=524)
1946 Points ∼100% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
372 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
369 Points ∼23% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
366 Points ∼23% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
443 Points ∼28% +19%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
257 Points ∼16% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (364 - 372, n=6)
369 Points ∼23% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=524)
1571 Points ∼100% +322%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
448 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
446 Points ∼30% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
441 Points ∼29% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
526 Points ∼35% +17%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
305 Points ∼20% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (439 - 448, n=6)
445 Points ∼30% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7012, n=525)
1504 Points ∼100% +236%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1602 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1654 Points ∼91% +3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1568 Points ∼86% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1646 Points ∼91% +3%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
911 Points ∼50% -43%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
943 Points ∼52% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1561 - 1654, n=6)
1593 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=565)
1814 Points ∼100% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
735 Points ∼36%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
719 Points ∼35% -2%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
704 Points ∼34% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
637 Points ∼31% -13%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
423 Points ∼21% -42%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
370 Points ∼18% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (704 - 735, n=6)
720 Points ∼35% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11488, n=564)
2053 Points ∼100% +179%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
835 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
822 Points ∼46% -2%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
802 Points ∼45% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
737 Points ∼42% -12%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
480 Points ∼27% -43%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
428 Points ∼24% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (802 - 835, n=6)
820 Points ∼46% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8866, n=567)
1774 Points ∼100% +112%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
23 fps ∼57%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
22 fps ∼55% -4%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
23 fps ∼57% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
20 fps ∼50% -13%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
19 fps ∼47% -17%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
20 fps ∼50% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (22 - 23, n=6)
22.8 fps ∼57% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=732)
40.1 fps ∼100% +74%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
35 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
34 fps ∼97% -3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
34 fps ∼97% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
31 fps ∼89% -11%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
26 fps ∼74% -26%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
27 fps ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (21 - 35, n=6)
32.2 fps ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=741)
29 fps ∼83% -17%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
9.8 fps ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
9.7 fps ∼42% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
9.8 fps ∼42% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11 fps ∼47% +12%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
9.8 fps ∼42% 0%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10 fps ∼43% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (9.7 - 19, n=6)
11.3 fps ∼48% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=636)
23.3 fps ∼100% +138%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
19 fps ∼94%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
18 fps ∼89% -5%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
18 fps ∼89% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
20 fps ∼99% +5%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
17 fps ∼84% -11%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
17 fps ∼84% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (9.3 - 19, n=6)
15.4 fps ∼76% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=645)
20.2 fps ∼100% +6%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
6.6 fps ∼35%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
6.4 fps ∼34% -3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.4 fps ∼34% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6.5 fps ∼34% -2%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6 fps ∼32% -9%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.2 fps ∼33% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (6.4 - 6.6, n=6)
6.43 fps ∼34% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=501)
18.9 fps ∼100% +186%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
14 fps ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
13 fps ∼74% -7%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13 fps ∼74% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
14 fps ∼80% 0%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10 fps ∼57% -29%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
11 fps ∼63% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (6 - 14, n=6)
12.2 fps ∼70% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=503)
17.5 fps ∼100% +25%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
4 fps ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.9 fps ∼39% -2%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.9 fps ∼39% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4.8 fps ∼48% +20%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.1 fps ∼41% +3%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.3 fps ∼43% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (2 - 4.1, n=6)
3.63 fps ∼36% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=236)
10.1 fps ∼100% +153%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1.2 fps ∼17%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1.2 fps ∼17% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1.2 fps ∼17% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1.4 fps ∼20% +17%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.4 fps ∼20% +17%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1.6 fps ∼23% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1.2 - 1.2, n=6)
1.2 fps ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 39, n=234)
7.1 fps ∼100% +492%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
6.7 fps ∼45%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
6.7 fps ∼45% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.6 fps ∼44% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
7.8 fps ∼52% +16%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.8 fps ∼45% +1%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
6.8 fps ∼45% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.5 - 6.7, n=5)
5.98 fps ∼40% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=240)
15 fps ∼100% +124%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
3.7 fps ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.6 fps ∼22% -3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.6 fps ∼22% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4 fps ∼24% +8%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.7 fps ∼22% 0%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.7 fps ∼28% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.6 - 3.7, n=6)
3.65 fps ∼22% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=240)
16.7 fps ∼100% +351%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
3.6 fps ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.5 fps ∼27% -3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.5 fps ∼27% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4.2 fps ∼33% +17%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2.8 fps ∼22% -22%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2.9 fps ∼23% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.5 - 3.6, n=6)
3.53 fps ∼28% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=426)
12.8 fps ∼100% +256%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
7.1 fps ∼62%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
7.1 fps ∼62% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
7 fps ∼61% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
8.6 fps ∼75% +21%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
3.9 fps ∼34% -45%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
4.7 fps ∼41% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.4 - 7.3, n=6)
6.48 fps ∼57% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=430)
11.4 fps ∼100% +61%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
849 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
821 Points ∼74% -3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
834 Points ∼75% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1106 Points ∼100% +30%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
703 Points ∼64% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (816 - 1083, n=6)
874 Points ∼79% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=668)
778 Points ∼70% -8%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1009 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
999 Points ∼45% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1000 Points ∼45% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
893 Points ∼40% -11%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
778 Points ∼35% -23%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
799 Points ∼36% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (995 - 1009, n=6)
1003 Points ∼45% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=668)
2206 Points ∼100% +119%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1287 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
758 Points ∼38% -41%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1316 Points ∼66% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
2008 Points ∼100% +56%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
661 Points ∼33% -49%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1019 Points ∼51% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (655 - 1335, n=6)
1102 Points ∼55% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=668)
1619 Points ∼81% +26%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
2587 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
2271 Points ∼67% -12%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2687 Points ∼80% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3372 Points ∼100% +30%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2165 Points ∼64% -16%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
2619 Points ∼78% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (2238 - 2687, n=6)
2511 Points ∼74% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=668)
3145 Points ∼93% +22%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
1294 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1090 Points ∼68% -16%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1310 Points ∼81% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1608 Points ∼100% +24%
LG K50
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
323 Points ∼20% -75%
Wiko View 3
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 3072
1106 Points ∼69% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1090 - 1312, n=6)
1236 Points ∼77% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=668)
1580 Points ∼98% +22%
AnTuTu v8
UX (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
11374 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
6969 Points ∼15% -39%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
16684 Points ∼36% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (6969 - 16684, n=4)
12860 Points ∼28% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6969 - 110361, n=53)
46667 Points ∼100% +310%
MEM (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
30734 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
27672 Points ∼55% -10%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
28689 Points ∼57% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (27672 - 30734, n=4)
29440 Points ∼58% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (16319 - 100390, n=53)
50474 Points ∼100% +64%
GPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
10803 Points ∼12%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
9258 Points ∼10% -14%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
9335 Points ∼10% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (9258 - 10803, n=4)
10049 Points ∼11% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5938 - 214615, n=53)
89526 Points ∼100% +729%
CPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
41690 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
40746 Points ∼43% -2%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
41127 Points ∼43% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (40746 - 41690, n=4)
41220 Points ∼43% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40620 - 178616, n=53)
94932 Points ∼100% +128%
Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 4096
94601 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
84645 Points ∼30% -11%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
95835 Points ∼34% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (84645 - 99193, n=4)
93569 Points ∼33% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (84645 - 599843, n=53)
281636 Points ∼100% +198%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=133)
37.1 Points ∼100% +122%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
21.488 Points ∼58% +29%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
16.678 Points ∼45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (15.9 - 16.9, n=5)
16.4 Points ∼44% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)
15.963 Points ∼43% -4%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
15.921 Points ∼43% -5%
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)
12.933 Points ∼35% -22%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=564)
43.6 Points ∼100% +70%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
39.076 Points ∼90% +53%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
27.086 Points ∼62% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (25.3 - 27.1, n=6)
26.3 Points ∼60% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
25.622 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)
25.252 Points ∼58% -1%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)
22.823 Points ∼52% -11%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=121)
40.6 runs/min ∼100% +133%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
21.63 runs/min ∼53% +24%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
18.23 runs/min ∼45% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (17.4 - 18.5, n=5)
18 runs/min ∼44% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)
17.4 runs/min ∼43% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
17.4 runs/min ∼43%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=196)
67.6 Points ∼100% +105%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
48 Points ∼71% +45%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
38 Points ∼56% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (32 - 38, n=6)
35.2 Points ∼52% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
33 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)
32 Points ∼47% -3%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)
26 Points ∼38% -21%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
7470 Points ∼100% +63%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=725)
7128 Points ∼95% +55%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
4810 Points ∼64% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (4512 - 4958, n=6)
4731 Points ∼63% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
4585 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)
4512 Points ∼60% -2%
LG K50 (Chrome 77)
4258 Points ∼57% -7%
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)
4114 Points ∼55% -10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG K50 (Chrome 77)
12799.1 ms * ∼100% -28%
Wiko View 3 (Chrome 75)
11757.3 ms * ∼92% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=750)
10258 ms * ∼80% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi 8A (Chrome 78)
10126.5 ms * ∼79% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79)
9976.3 ms * ∼78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (9768 - 10143, n=6)
9963 ms * ∼78% -0%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
9768.3 ms * ∼76% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
5546.4 ms * ∼43% +44%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi 8Xiaomi Redmi 8ANokia 4.2Samsung Galaxy A20eLG K50Wiko View 3Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
9%
-38%
5%
-9%
-8%
30%
23%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
61.7 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
65.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
64.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
58.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
63.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
57.9 (11.2 - 74.7, n=112)
-9%
50.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=470)
-21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
86.86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.9 (Tohsiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
86.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
79.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
78.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
81.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
76.9 (21.1 - 87.2, n=112)
-11%
68.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=470)
-21%
Random Write 4KB
7.33
15.8
116%
4.31
-41%
13.18
80%
12.03
64%
8.98
23%
25.5 (3.4 - 125, n=127)
248%
26.1 (0.14 - 259, n=802)
256%
Random Read 4KB
78.98
73.1
-7%
17.51
-78%
79.76
1%
52.12
-34%
55.23
-30%
55.8 (11.4 - 149, n=127)
-29%
51.3 (1.59 - 226, n=802)
-35%
Sequential Write 256KB
202.65
106.4
-47%
18.17
-91%
103.57
-49%
78.9
-61%
132.39
-35%
172 (40 - 254, n=127)
-15%
107 (2.99 - 729, n=802)
-47%
Sequential Read 256KB
285.66
282
-1%
220.39
-23%
300.36
5%
263.42
-8%
287.32
1%
274 (95.6 - 704, n=127)
-4%
295 (12.1 - 1781, n=802)
3%
PUBG Mobile
0102030Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø24.8 (22-26)
; Balanced: Ø23.9 (14-26)
Asphalt 9: Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø20.5 (13-31)
; Standard / low: Ø28.8 (20-31)
Hög belastning
 29.3 °C29.1 °C29.7 °C 
 28.7 °C28.8 °C30.7 °C 
 28.3 °C28.3 °C28.7 °C 
Max: 30.7 °C
Medel: 29.1 °C
26.2 °C26.8 °C29.5 °C
26.3 °C26.9 °C28.9 °C
26.7 °C27.4 °C27.4 °C
Max: 29.5 °C
Medel: 27.3 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  25.3 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.640.32527.523.93119.227.74023.225.75033.537.86325.624.78020.527.91002022.412519.227.216021.138.120016.742.725016.949.531515.954.740015.857.45001563.663014.166.980014.773.8100014.275.8125014.177.7160014.476.2200013.976.925001477.6315014.677400014.177.1500014.479.6630014.476.9800015.3761000014.976.61250015.877160001760.3SPL26.788.6N0.874.4median 14.9median 75.8Delta1.612.936.742.733.637.834.335.133.830.63933.534.831.43130.530.232.123.228.122.835.322.636.919.844.220.150.316.951.916.856.915.259.415.864.915.869.314.569.31570.914.17015.369.814.971.614.969.614.770.114.769.614.970.814.873.215.361.615.45227.881.6149.8median 15.3median 64.92.110.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi 8Samsung Galaxy A20e
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A20e audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.12 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.57 / 1.8 / 1.82 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 2.57 / 4.12 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi 8
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
5000 mAh
Nokia 4.2
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A20e
3000 mAh
LG K50
3500 mAh
Wiko View 3
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-41%
-15%
1%
4%
4%
-36%
-33%
Idle Minimum *
0.57
0.9
-58%
0.74
-30%
0.66
-16%
0.7
-23%
0.67
-18%
0.82 (0.57 - 1.28, n=6)
-44%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=818)
-54%
Idle Average *
1.8
1.8
-0%
1.9
-6%
1.63
9%
1
44%
1.73
4%
2.21 (1.6 - 4.5, n=6)
-23%
1.741 (0.6 - 6.2, n=817)
3%
Idle Maximum *
1.82
2.4
-32%
2.21
-21%
1.67
8%
1.8
1%
1.79
2%
2.49 (1.73 - 4.59, n=6)
-37%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=818)
-12%
Load Average *
2.57
4.3
-67%
3.04
-18%
2.77
-8%
2.4
7%
2.18
15%
3.78 (2.57 - 5.71, n=6)
-47%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=812)
-59%
Load Maximum *
4.12
6
-46%
4.15
-1%
3.66
11%
4.5
-9%
3.43
17%
5.24 (4.12 - 6.99, n=6)
-27%
5.99 (1.2 - 14.2, n=812)
-45%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
42tim 01min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
19tim 17min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13tim 18min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
5tim 08min
Xiaomi Redmi 8
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 8A
5000 mAh
Nokia 4.2
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A20e
3000 mAh
LG K50
3500 mAh
Wiko View 3
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
11%
-40%
-27%
-29%
-14%
Reader / Idle
2521
1903
-25%
1432
-43%
H.264
798
1193
49%
753
-6%
WiFi v1.3
1157
1145
-1%
696
-40%
715
-38%
822
-29%
995
-14%
Load
308
367
19%
250
-19%

För

+ Vacker design
+ Välbyggd
+ Bra fingeravtrycksläsare
+ Fullständig dual-SIM + microSD-kortplats
+ Riktigt lång batteritid
+ Bra kameror för en budgettelefon
+ Ljusstark och kontrastrik IPS-skärm...

Emot

- ...med en klasstypisk HD-upplösning
- Har bara Widevine L3-certifiering trots att en global version finns
- Klasstypisk prestanda
- Långsamt minne
- Saknar NFC

Omdöme - Xiaomi Redmi 8 sätter en ny standard för budgettelefoner

Recension av Xiaomi Redmi 8. Recensionsex från Trading Shenzhen.
Recension av Xiaomi Redmi 8. Recensionsex från Trading Shenzhen.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Redmi 8, som på papperet påminner mycket om Redmi 8A, är en betydande uppgradering från sitt syskon trots att de ser nästan likadana ut. Den förstnämnda har inte bara bättre kameror och en bättre högtalare utan också bättre anslutbarhet och en märkbart bättre skärm. Även om vi rekommenderade den billigare Redmi 8A när vi recenserade den så ger Redmi 8 ännu bättre valuta för pengarna. För att sammanfatta så sätter Xiaomis senaste Redmi-telefon en ny standard för telefoner under 1.200 kronor, särskilt eftersom den inte har några större brister.

Däremot har Xiaomi ändå fått kompromissa med en del saker, föga förvånande med tanke på enhetens låga pris. Redmi 8 är och förblir en instegstelefon. Således har Xiaomi utrustat den med en svag SoC, en lågupplöst skärm, eMMC-flashlagring och en långsam WiFi-modul. För bara 300 kronor mer är Redmi Note 8 ett värt alternativ till Redmi 8 då den erbjuder betydligt bättre prestanda för en väldigt liten prisökning.

Xiaomi Redmi 8 har mer än de flesta telefoner för under 1.200 kronor. Om priset är en begränsande faktor när du letar efter en ny telefon är Redmi 8 ett bra alternativ.

Xiaomi Redmi 8 - 01/20/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Design
82%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Mus
88%
Anslutningar
42 / 70 → 59%
Vikt
89%
Batteri
91%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
6 / 64 → 9%
Programprestanda
45 / 86 → 52%
Temperatur
95%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
52%
Medel
71%
76%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Redmi 8 - Xiaomis budgettelefon sätter en ny standard (Sammanfattning)
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-01-26 (Update: 2020-01-26)