Notebookcheck

Test: Xiaomi Redmi Go Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 04/01/2019

Är det binGo? Xiaomis första smartphone med Android Go, Redmi Go, är här. Förväntningarna på denna smartphone för 800 kronor är höga eftersom företaget hittills har lyckats med att om och om igen erbjuda utmärkt prestanda till ett bra pris. Fungerar det även i det allra billigaste prissegmentet?

Xiaomi Redmi Go (Redmi Serie)
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 308
Minne
1024 MB 
Skärm
5 tum 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixlar 294 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
8 GB eMMC Flash, 8 GB 
, 5 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 128 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, närhetssensor
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.1, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.35 x 140.4 x 70.1
Batteri
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.0, Kontrast-AF, LED-blixt, video @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.2
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare på den undre kanten, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Laddare, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, LTE Cat 4 (150Mbps/​50Mbps); SAR-värden: 0,579W/​kg (huvud), 1,497W/​kg (kropp); DRM Widevine: L3; ExFAT: nej, fanless
Vikt
137 g, Strömförsörjning: 57 g
Pris
79 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Redmi Go
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Xiaomi Redmi Go

Storleksjämförelse

148 mm 72 mm 9.1 mm 172 g146.7 mm 70.7 mm 9.6 mm 170 g146.5 mm 70.9 mm 8.3 mm 142 g140.4 mm 70.1 mm 8.35 mm 137 g133.6 mm 67.8 mm 9.5 mm 131 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=419)
223 MBit/s ∼100% +303%
Honor 7S
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
58.2 MBit/s ∼26% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 (min: 46, max: 58) MBit/s ∼25%
Nokia 1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 8 GB eMMC Flash
49.1 MBit/s ∼22% -11%
Blackview A20
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 8 GB eMMC Flash
44.4 MBit/s ∼20% -20%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
12.5 MBit/s ∼6% -77%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=419)
212 MBit/s ∼100% +275%
Honor 7S
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
59.9 MBit/s ∼28% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
56.6 (min: 48, max: 61) MBit/s ∼27%
Nokia 1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 8 GB eMMC Flash
51.2 MBit/s ∼24% -10%
Blackview A20
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 8 GB eMMC Flash
46 MBit/s ∼22% -19%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
14.6 MBit/s ∼7% -74%
010203040506070Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø55 (46-58)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø56.6 (48-61)
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Trafikplats
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Trafikplats
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bro
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bro
GPS Xiaomi Redmi Go – Översikt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi Go – Översikt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi Go – Trafikplats
GPS Xiaomi Redmi Go – Trafikplats
GPS Xiaomi Redmi Go – Bro
GPS Xiaomi Redmi Go – Bro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Testkarta
Testkarta
Testkarta (detaljer)
Testkarta (detaljer)
ColorChecker - Färger; referensfärgen i den nedre halvan av varje ruta.
ColorChecker - Färger; referensfärgen i den nedre halvan av varje ruta.
301
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
267
cd/m²
292
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
329
cd/m²
313
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 346 cd/m² Medel: 309.1 cd/m² Minimum: 5.07 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 77 %
Mitt på batteriet: 340 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1214:1 (Svärta: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.53 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
94% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.275
Xiaomi Redmi Go
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Nokia 1
IPS, 854x480, 4.5
Wiko Jerry 3
IPS, 960x480, 5.45
Honor 7S
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Blackview A20
IPS, 960x480, 5.5
Screen
15%
-24%
8%
-53%
Brightness middle
340
256
-25%
370
9%
422
24%
364
7%
Brightness
309
251
-19%
367
19%
417
35%
375
21%
Brightness Distribution
77
89
16%
90
17%
96
25%
90
17%
Black Level *
0.28
0.12
57%
0.4
-43%
0.58
-107%
0.71
-154%
Contrast
1214
2133
76%
925
-24%
728
-40%
513
-58%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.53
4.82
13%
8.58
-55%
3.29
41%
10.12
-83%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.87
11.75
-19%
16.5
-67%
6.91
30%
19.63
-99%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.4
5.2
19%
9.3
-45%
3.1
52%
11.1
-73%
Gamma
2.275 97%
2.3 96%
2.083 106%
2.219 99%
2.722 81%
CCT
8198 79%
7107 91%
9315 70%
6873 95%
10121 64%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 100 Hz ≤ 30 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9418 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1394 Points ∼31%
Nokia 1
Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024
943 Points ∼21% -32%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
875 Points ∼19% -37%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1172 Points ∼26% -16%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
858 Points ∼19% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (1113 - 1460, n=15)
1352 Points ∼30% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=317)
4565 Points ∼100% +227%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1634 Points ∼36%
Nokia 1
Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024
1252 Points ∼27% -23%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
1136 Points ∼25% -30%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1748 Points ∼38% +7%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
1160 Points ∼25% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (883 - 1939, n=17)
1752 Points ∼38% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=375)
4601 Points ∼100% +182%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
631 Points ∼46%
Nokia 1
Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024
492 Points ∼36% -22%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
431 Points ∼31% -32%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
644 Points ∼47% +2%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
427 Points ∼31% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (541 - 692, n=17)
654 Points ∼48% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=377)
1374 Points ∼100% +118%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3192 Points ∼63%
Nokia 1
Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024
2335 Points ∼46% -27%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
0 Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2467 Points ∼49% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (2829 - 3629, n=17)
3268 Points ∼65% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=373)
5046 Points ∼100% +58%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
4050 Points ∼73%
Nokia 1
Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024
3054 Points ∼55% -25%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2528 Points ∼46% -38%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2696 Points ∼49% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (4009 - 4813, n=17)
4080 Points ∼74% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=541)
5537 Points ∼100% +37%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
853 Points ∼47%
Nokia 1
Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024
614 Points ∼34% -28%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
629 Points ∼35% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (375 - 911, n=16)
839 Points ∼46% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=402)
1811 Points ∼100% +112%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
248 Points ∼11%
Nokia 1
Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024
105 Points ∼5% -58%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
162 Points ∼7% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (118 - 250, n=16)
240 Points ∼11% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=402)
2185 Points ∼100% +781%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
294 Points ∼16%
Nokia 1
Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024
129 Points ∼7% -56%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
194 Points ∼10% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (145 - 298, n=16)
284 Points ∼15% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=403)
1860 Points ∼100% +533%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
878 Points ∼52%
Nokia 1
Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024
663 Points ∼39% -24%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
620 Points ∼37% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (622 - 907, n=17)
865 Points ∼51% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=496)
1680 Points ∼100% +91%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
43 Points ∼2%
Nokia 1
Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024
61 Points ∼3% +42%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
125 Points ∼7% +191%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (31 - 199, n=17)
56.3 Points ∼3% +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=496)
1803 Points ∼100% +4093%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
55 Points ∼4%
Nokia 1
Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024
76 Points ∼5% +38%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
152 Points ∼10% +176%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (39 - 239, n=17)
70.5 Points ∼5% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=504)
1549 Points ∼100% +2716%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10188 Points ∼74%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
8065 Points ∼59% -21%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
8269 Points ∼60% -19%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
8200 Points ∼60% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (3958 - 10784, n=17)
9816 Points ∼72% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=654)
13712 Points ∼100% +35%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5391 Points ∼27%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2465 Points ∼12% -54%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
4346 Points ∼22% -19%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2470 Points ∼12% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (2546 - 5712, n=17)
5304 Points ∼26% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7567 - 162695, n=654)
20179 Points ∼100% +274%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6021 Points ∼36%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2915 Points ∼17% -52%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
4203 Points ∼25% -30%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2924 Points ∼17% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (2951 - 6379, n=17)
5871 Points ∼35% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8316 - 83518, n=655)
16716 Points ∼100% +178%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼22%
Nokia 1
Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024
5.1 fps ∼14% -33%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
4.4 fps ∼13% -42%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
6.1 fps ∼17% -20%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
4.4 fps ∼13% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (3.4 - 7.8, n=17)
7.41 fps ∼21% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=684)
35.2 fps ∼100% +363%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
13 fps ∼48%
Nokia 1
Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024
14 fps ∼52% +8%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
12 fps ∼44% -8%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
10 fps ∼37% -23%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
10 fps ∼37% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (6.4 - 20, n=17)
13.4 fps ∼49% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=687)
27.1 fps ∼100% +108%
GFXBench 3.0 - on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5.6 fps ∼31%
Nokia 1
Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024
8 fps ∼44% +43%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
5.7 fps ∼32% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (3.7 - 11, n=17)
5.94 fps ∼33% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=608)
18 fps ∼100% +221%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
37218 Points ∼43%
Nokia 1
Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
23916 Points ∼28% -36%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
24802 Points ∼29% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (29054 - 39106, n=17)
36278 Points ∼42% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23275 - 283270, n=486)
86413 Points ∼100% +132%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10 Points ∼1%
Nokia 1
Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024
571 Points ∼76% +5610%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
580 Points ∼78% +5700%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (10 - 802, n=17)
611 Points ∼82% +6010%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=616)
747 Points ∼100% +7370%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
426 Points ∼22%
Nokia 1
Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024
176 Points ∼9% -59%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
145 Points ∼7% -66%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
187 Points ∼10% -56%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
145 Points ∼7% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (418 - 447, n=17)
437 Points ∼22% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=616)
1965 Points ∼100% +361%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
363 Points ∼25%
Nokia 1
Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024
505 Points ∼34% +39%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
373 Points ∼25% +3%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
920 Points ∼62% +153%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
376 Points ∼26% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (363 - 1372, n=17)
678 Points ∼46% +87%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=616)
1473 Points ∼100% +306%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1210 Points ∼42%
Nokia 1
Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024
859 Points ∼30% -29%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
963 Points ∼33% -20%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1341 Points ∼46% +11%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
969 Points ∼34% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (1043 - 1477, n=17)
1274 Points ∼44% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=616)
2887 Points ∼100% +139%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
207 Points ∼14%
Nokia 1
Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024
457 Points ∼32% +121%
Wiko Jerry 3
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
150 Points ∼10% -28%
Honor 7S
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
217 Points ∼15% +5%
Blackview A20
Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
418 Points ∼29% +102%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (207 - 891, n=17)
642 Points ∼45% +210%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=620)
1437 Points ∼100% +594%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 273, n=516)
39.1 Points ∼100% +142%
Honor 7S (Chrome 67)
17.542 Points ∼45% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (15.5 - 18.7, n=16)
17.5 Points ∼45% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)
16.156 Points ∼41%
Nokia 1 (Chrome 66)
11.55 Points ∼30% -29%
Blackview A20 (Chrome 67)
11.351 Points ∼29% -30%
Wiko Jerry 3 (Chrome 67)
10.829 Points ∼28% -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=677)
6359 Points ∼100% +164%
Honor 7S (Chrome 67)
3132 Points ∼49% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2411 - 3374, n=17)
2952 Points ∼46% +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)
2411 Points ∼38%
Nokia 1 (Chrome 66)
1907 Points ∼30% -21%
Blackview A20 (Chrome 67)
1769 Points ∼28% -27%
Wiko Jerry 3 (Chrome 67)
1645 Points ∼26% -32%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Wiko Jerry 3 (Chrome 67)
19458 ms * ∼100% -40%
Blackview A20 (Chrome 67)
19213 ms * ∼99% -38%
Nokia 1 (Chrome 66)
18927 ms * ∼97% -36%
Honor 7S (Chrome 67)
17851.5 ms * ∼92% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)
13899 ms * ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (10742 - 16192, n=17)
13125 ms * ∼67% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=697)
10720 ms * ∼55% +23%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=147)
63 Points ∼100% +163%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (24 - 28, n=5)
26 Points ∼41% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)
24 Points ∼38%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Average of class Smartphone (66 - 362, n=332)
119 Points ∼100% +61%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)
74 Points ∼62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (62 - 79, n=8)
71.3 Points ∼60% -4%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi GoNokia 1Wiko Jerry 3Honor 7SBlackview A20Average 8 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-25%
-48%
-1%
-76%
-56%
15%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7.4 (Kingston 32GB)
-88%
61.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
11.2 (Kingston 32GB)
-82%
29.1 (11.2 - 63.4, n=21)
-54%
48.5 (9.5 - 87.1, n=409)
-24%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
16 (Kingston 32GB)
-81%
80.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
20.6 (Kingston 32GB)
-76%
43.1 (16.3 - 84.2, n=21)
-49%
66.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=409)
-21%
Random Write 4KB
11.9
9.1
-24%
11.23
-6%
13.24
11%
3.4
-71%
5.35 (1.08 - 14, n=51)
-55%
20.6 (0.14 - 250, n=725)
73%
Random Read 4KB
45.4
25.7
-43%
24.18
-47%
39.69
-13%
11.3
-75%
18.1 (8 - 50.5, n=51)
-60%
45.4 (1.59 - 175, n=725)
0%
Sequential Write 256KB
54.8
51.8
-5%
50.81
-7%
67.07
22%
8
-85%
22.1 (6.22 - 54.8, n=51)
-60%
93 (2.99 - 503, n=725)
70%
Sequential Read 256KB
289.3
208.3
-28%
117.14
-60%
237.57
-18%
90.2
-69%
129 (38.1 - 289, n=51)
-55%
262 (12.1 - 1468, n=725)
-9%
Arena of Valor
010203040Tooltip
; min; 1.27.1.2: Ø31 (23-32)
; high HD; 1.27.1.2: Ø30.9 (23-32)
Shadow Fight 3
0102030405060Tooltip
; high; 1.17.0: Ø34.2 (20-44)
; minimal; 1.17.0: Ø43.4 (20-53)
Hög belastning
 42.5 °C38.7 °C39.9 °C 
 41.3 °C38.4 °C40.9 °C 
 40.3 °C38.4 °C39.8 °C 
Max: 42.5 °C
Medel: 40 °C
35.5 °C37 °C40.6 °C
34.9 °C37 °C40.6 °C
34.3 °C37.3 °C39.4 °C
Max: 40.6 °C
Medel: 37.4 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  39.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.346.12549.352.93137.839.24037.539.55042.143.26335.336.48028.72910025.930.512529.128.816026.830.820023.438.525022.745.831522.151.940020.756.650020.965.363019.270.980018.672100019.970.3125018.371.3160018.674.6200017.975.8250017.975.5315017.572.2400017.561.8500017.463.1630017.368.9800017.569.81000017.567.71250017.659.41600017.652SPL68.830.883.7N22.41.554.9median 18.6median 65.3Delta2.410.93039.631.643.7324234.947.140.355.928.85328.149.82741.522.54021.438.521.232.420.133.618.440.118.146.519.950.416.36116.56615.969.8166915.569.215.370.315.16814.966.915.168.715.164.415.163.915.167.815.265.115.258.915.255.77328.179.428.61.143.1median 15.9median 63.91.911hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi GoNokia 1
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Go audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Nokia 1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.2 / 1.9 / 2.5 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.5 / 5.5 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Go
3000 mAh
Nokia 1
2150 mAh
Wiko Jerry 3
2500 mAh
Honor 7S
3020 mAh
Blackview A20
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
22%
4%
-48%
2%
-1%
12%
Idle Minimum *
1.2
0.9
25%
1
17%
2.5
-108%
1.1
8%
1.113 (0.54 - 4.02, n=17)
7%
0.878 (0.2 - 3.4, n=752)
27%
Idle Average *
1.9
1.5
21%
1.5
21%
3
-58%
1.5
21%
2.19 (1.2 - 6, n=17)
-15%
1.732 (0.6 - 6.2, n=751)
9%
Idle Maximum *
2.5
2
20%
2.3
8%
3.8
-52%
2.3
8%
2.55 (1.62 - 6.64, n=17)
-2%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=752)
19%
Load Average *
4.5
3.5
22%
5
-11%
5.4
-20%
4.8
-7%
4.32 (2.9 - 9.6, n=17)
4%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=746)
10%
Load Maximum *
5.5
4.3
22%
6.3
-15%
5.7
-4%
6.5
-18%
5.5 (4.3 - 7.34, n=17)
-0%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=746)
-7%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
26tim 04min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12tim 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15tim 16min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
3tim 33min
Xiaomi Redmi Go
3000 mAh
Nokia 1
2150 mAh
Wiko Jerry 3
2500 mAh
Honor 7S
3020 mAh
Blackview A20
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-26%
-47%
12%
-26%
Reader / Idle
1564
H.264
916
WiFi v1.3
749
552
-26%
394
-47%
840
12%
556
-26%
Load
213

För

+ bra förhållande mellan pris och prestanda
+ bra batteritid
+ trevligt minne för sin klass
+ jämförelsevis många LTE-band
+ dedikerad microSD-plats
+ skaplig röstkvalitet

Emot

- ont om internt minne
- Android Go med bloatware från tillverkaren
- i en del länder finns ingen garanti från tillverkaren
- ganska mörk skärm

Omdöme – Lågt pris utan att vara Billig

Recenseras: Xiaomi Redmi Go. Recensionsex från Xiaomi Austria.
Recenseras: Xiaomi Redmi Go. Recensionsex från Xiaomi Austria.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Xiaomi Redmi Go överraskar igen: Till ett riktigt lågt pris får man mer än man förväntar sig. Detta inkluderar högre prestanda, fler LTE-band och en bättre kamera än vad som är typiskt för den här klassen. Dessutom är chassit ganska stabilt och den har skaplig batteritid. Batteriet går dock inte att byta ut, vilket går på många andra billiga smartphones.

Det är synd att Xiaomi fyllde Googles smala Android Go med bloatware i form av en extra programstartare och förinstallerade appar: Med bara 8 GB internt minne räknas varje MB. Men det går ändå att utöka minnet på ett bekvämt sätt med ett microSD-kort, vilket till och med ger en trevlig respons. Dessutom går det att använda två SIM-kort samtidigt.

Xiaomi Redmi Go känns betydligt snabbare och mer prisvärd än priset antyder.

För att svara på vår ursprungliga fråga: Ja, det är en bingo - eller heter det bara bingo? Oavsett så sätter Xiaomi Redmi Go återigen en ny standard, till och med bland de billigaste telefonerna. Den som inte har så höga krav och kan tänka sig att omfamna den aningen oklara garantisituationen som råder i en del länder kommer att få mycket prestanda för pengarna.

Xiaomi Redmi Go - 03/14/2019 v6
Florian Schmitt

Design
68%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
91%
Anslutningar
35 / 60 → 58%
Vikt
93%
Batteri
96%
Skärm
82%
Spelprestanda
6 / 63 → 9%
Programprestanda
31 / 70 → 44%
Temperatur
87%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
55 / 91 → 60%
Camera
59%
Medel
67%
79%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Redmi Go Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Florian Schmitt, 2019-04- 1 (Update: 2019-04- 2)