Test: Xiaomi Redmi Go Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Go
Brand: Xiaomi

Är det binGo? Xiaomis första smartphone med Android Go, Redmi Go, är här. Förväntningarna på denna smartphone för 800 kronor är höga eftersom företaget hittills har lyckats med att om och om igen erbjuda utmärkt prestanda till ett bra pris. Fungerar det även i det allra billigaste prissegmentet?

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 04/01/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Österreich

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi Go (Redmi Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) 4 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 308

Minne

1024 MB

Skärm

5.00 tum 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixlar 294 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

8 GB eMMC Flash, 8 GB

, 5 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 128 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, närhetssensor

Nätverk

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.35 x 140.4 x 70.1

Batteri

11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Litiumpolymer

Operativsystem

Android 8.1 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, Kontrast-AF, LED-blixt, video @1080p/30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2

Övrigt

Högtalare: Monohögtalare på den undre kanten, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Laddare, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, LTE Cat 4 (150Mbps/50Mbps); SAR-värden: 0,579W/kg (huvud), 1,497W/kg (kropp); DRM Widevine: L3; ExFAT: nej, fanless

Vikt

137 g, Strömförsörjning: 57 g

Pris

79 Kr

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Honor 7S PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	59.9 MBit/s +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Go Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash	56.6 (48^min - 61^max) MBit/s
Nokia 1 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 8 GB eMMC Flash	51.2 MBit/s -10%
Blackview A20 Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 8 GB eMMC Flash	46 MBit/s -19%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash	14.6 MBit/s -74%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s +579%
Honor 7S PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash	58.2 MBit/s +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Go Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash	55.4 (46^min - 58^max) MBit/s
Nokia 1 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 8 GB eMMC Flash	49.1 MBit/s -11%
Blackview A20 Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 8 GB eMMC Flash	44.4 MBit/s -20%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash	12.5 MBit/s -77%

Xiaomi Redmi Go; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø55 (46-58)

Xiaomi Redmi Go; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø56.6 (48-61)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

ColorChecker - Färger; referensfärgen i den nedre halvan av varje ruta.


301 cd/m²	346 cd/m²	267 cd/m²
292 cd/m²	340 cd/m²	305 cd/m²
289 cd/m²	329 cd/m²	313 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 346 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 309.1 cd/m² Minimum: 5.07 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 77 %
Mitt på batteriet: 340 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1214:1 (Svärta: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.53 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.275

	Xiaomi Redmi Go IPS, 1280x720, 5.00	Nokia 1 IPS, 854x480, 4.50	Wiko Jerry 3 IPS, 960x480, 5.45	Honor 7S IPS, 1440x720, 5.45	Blackview A20 IPS, 960x480, 5.50
Screen		15%	-24%	8%	-53%
Brightness middle	340	256 -25%	370 9%	422 24%	364 7%
Brightness	309	251 -19%	367 19%	417 35%	375 21%
Brightness Distribution	77	89 16%	90 17%	96 25%	90 17%
Black Level *	0.28	0.12 57%	0.4 -43%	0.58 -107%	0.71 -154%
Contrast	1214	2133 76%	925 -24%	728 -40%	513 -58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.53	4.82 13%	8.58 -55%	3.29 41%	10.12 -83%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.87	11.75 -19%	16.5 -67%	6.91 30%	19.63 -99%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.4	5.2 19%	9.3 -45%	3.1 52%	11.1 -73%
Gamma	2.275 ^97%	2.3 ^96%	2.083 ^106%	2.219 ^99%	2.722 ^81%
CCT	8198 ^79%	7107 ^91%	9315 ^70%	6873 ^95%	10121 ^64%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

100 Hz

≤ 30 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	631 Points
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024	492 Points -22%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	431 Points -32%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	644 Points +2%
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	427 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (541 - 692, n=18)	654 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)	5228 Points +729%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	1634 Points
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024	1252 Points -23%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	1136 Points -30%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1748 Points +7%
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	1160 Points -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (883 - 1939, n=18)	1761 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)	14045 Points +760%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	1394 Points
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024	943 Points -32%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	875 Points -37%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1172 Points -16%
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	858 Points -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1113 - 1460, n=16)	1345 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)	10872 Points +680%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	4050 Points
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024	3054 Points -25%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	2528 Points -38%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	Points -100%
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	2696 Points -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3681 - 5253, n=17)	4389 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)	15091 Points +273%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	3192 Points
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024	2335 Points -27%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	0 Points -100%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	2467 Points -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2829 - 3831, n=18)	3299 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)	10872 Points +241%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	6021 Points
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	2915 Points -52%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	4203 Points -30%
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	2924 Points -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2951 - 6526, n=18)	5908 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	5391 Points
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	2465 Points -54%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	4346 Points -19%
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	2470 Points -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2546 - 5778, n=18)	5330 Points -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	10188 Points
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	8065 Points -21%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	8269 Points -19%
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	8200 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3958 - 11927, n=18)	9933 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	55 Points
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024	76 Points +38%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	Points -100%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	152 Points +176%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (39 - 350, n=18)	86 Points +56%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)	3766 Points +6747%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	43 Points
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024	61 Points +42%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	Points -100%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	125 Points +191%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (31 - 297, n=18)	69.7 Points +62%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)	4186 Points +9635%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	878 Points
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024	663 Points -24%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	Points -100%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	620 Points -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (622 - 944, n=18)	869 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)	3082 Points +251%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	294 Points
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024	129 Points -56%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	Points -100%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	194 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (145 - 354, n=17)	288 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=113, last 2 years)	9235 Points +3041%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	248 Points
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024	105 Points -58%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	Points -100%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	162 Points -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (118 - 301, n=17)	244 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=112, last 2 years)	16095 Points +6390%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	853 Points
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024	614 Points -28%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	Points -100%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	629 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (375 - 916, n=17)	843 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=112, last 2 years)	4393 Points +415%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	13 fps
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024	14 fps +8%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	12 fps -8%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	10 fps -23%
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	10 fps -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (6.4 - 20, n=18)	13.4 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=182, last 2 years)	84.5 fps +550%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	7.6 fps
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024	5.1 fps -33%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	4.4 fps -42%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	6.1 fps -20%
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	4.4 fps -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3.4 - 7.8, n=18)	7.42 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=182, last 2 years)	247 fps +3150%

GFXBench 3.0 - on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	5.6 fps
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024	8 fps +43%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	fps -100%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	5.7 fps +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3.7 - 11, n=18)	5.97 fps +7%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=184, last 2 years)	72 fps +1186%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	37218 Points
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024	Points -100%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	23916 Points -36%
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	24802 Points -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (29054 - 39106, n=17)	36278 Points -3%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	207 Points
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024	457 Points +121%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	150 Points -28%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	217 Points +5%
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	418 Points +102%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (207 - 891, n=17)	642 Points +210%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)	5745 Points +2675%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	1210 Points
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024	859 Points -29%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	963 Points -20%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	1341 Points +11%
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	969 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1043 - 1477, n=17)	1274 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)	9678 Points +700%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	363 Points
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024	505 Points +39%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	373 Points +3%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	920 Points +153%
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	376 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (363 - 1372, n=17)	678 Points +87%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)	6250 Points +1622%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	426 Points
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024	176 Points -59%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	145 Points -66%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	187 Points -56%
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	145 Points -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (418 - 447, n=17)	437 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)	14101 Points +3210%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024	10 Points
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, Mali-T720 MP2, 1024	571 Points +5610%
Wiko Jerry 3 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	10 Points 0%
Honor 7S Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048	10 Points 0%
Blackview A20 Mediatek MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024	580 Points +5700%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (10 - 802, n=17)	611 Points +6010%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)	1494 Points +14840%

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	104.3 Points +545%
Honor 7S (Chrome 67)	17.54 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (15.5 - 18.7, n=16)	17.5 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)	16.16 Points
Nokia 1 (Chrome 66)	11.55 Points -29%
Blackview A20 (Chrome 67)	11.35 Points -30%
Wiko Jerry 3 (Chrome 67)	10.83 Points -33%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=210, last 2 years)	33573 Points +1292%
Honor 7S (Chrome 67)	3132 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2411 - 3374, n=17)	2952 Points +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)	2411 Points
Nokia 1 (Chrome 66)	1907 Points -21%
Blackview A20 (Chrome 67)	1769 Points -27%
Wiko Jerry 3 (Chrome 67)	1645 Points -32%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Wiko Jerry 3 (Chrome 67)	19458 ms * -40%
Blackview A20 (Chrome 67)	19213 ms * -38%
Nokia 1 (Chrome 66)	18927 ms * -36%
Honor 7S (Chrome 67)	17852 ms * -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)	13899 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (10742 - 16192, n=17)	13125 ms * +6%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years)	1599 ms * +88%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +455%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (24 - 28, n=5)	26 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)	24 Points

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Xiaomi Redmi Go (Chrome 72)	74 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (62 - 79, n=8)	71.3 Points -4%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Redmi Go	Nokia 1	Wiko Jerry 3	Honor 7S	Blackview A20	Average 8 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-25%	-48%	-1%	-76%	-56%	1243%
Sequential Read 256KB	289.3	208.3 -28%	117.1 -60%	237.6 -18%	90.2 -69%	128.8 ?(38.1 - 289, n=51) -55%	1505 ?(226 - 4512, n=215, last 2 years) 420%
Sequential Write 256KB	54.8	51.8 -5%	50.8 -7%	67.1 22%	8 -85%	22.1 ?(6.22 - 54.8, n=51) -60%	1112 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=215, last 2 years) 1929%
Random Read 4KB	45.4	25.7 -43%	24.18 -47%	39.69 -13%	11.3 -75%	18.1 ?(8 - 50.5, n=51) -60%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=215, last 2 years) 444%
Random Write 4KB	11.9	9.1 -24%	11.23 -6%	13.24 11%	3.4 -71%	5.35 ?(1.08 - 14, n=51) -55%	271 ?(13 - 709, n=215, last 2 years) 2177%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	84.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		16 ?(Kingston 32GB) -81%	80.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%	20.6 ?(Kingston 32GB) -76%	43.1 ?(16.3 - 84.2, n=21) -49%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	63.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		7.4 ?(Kingston 32GB) -88%	61.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	11.2 ?(Kingston 32GB) -82%	29.1 ?(11.2 - 63.4, n=21) -54%

Arena of Valor

Xiaomi Redmi Go; min; 1.27.1.2: Ø31 (23-32)

Xiaomi Redmi Go; high HD; 1.27.1.2: Ø30.9 (23-32)

Shadow Fight 3

Xiaomi Redmi Go; minimal; 1.17.0: Ø43.4 (20-53)

Xiaomi Redmi Go; high; 1.17.0: Ø34.2 (20-44)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


42.5 °C	38.7 °C	39.9 °C
41.3 °C	38.4 °C	40.9 °C
40.3 °C	38.4 °C	39.8 °C

Max: 42.5 °C
Medel: 40 °C


35.5 °C	37 °C	40.6 °C
34.9 °C	37 °C	40.6 °C
34.3 °C	37.3 °C	39.4 °C

Max: 40.6 °C
Medel: 37.4 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 39.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Go audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 69.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 69.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 69.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (128.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Nokia 1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 61.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 61.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 61.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (127.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Låg belastning	1.2 / 1.9 / 2.5 Watt
Hög belastning	4.5 / 5.5 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Xiaomi Redmi Go 3000 mAh	Nokia 1 2150 mAh	Wiko Jerry 3 2500 mAh	Honor 7S 3020 mAh	Blackview A20 3000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		22%	4%	-48%	2%	-1%	2%
Idle Minimum *	1.2	0.9 25%	1 17%	2.5 -108%	1.1 8%	1.113 ?(0.54 - 4.02, n=17) 7%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) 25%
Idle Average *	1.9	1.5 21%	1.5 21%	3 -58%	1.5 21%	2.19 ?(1.2 - 6, n=17) -15%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 24%
Idle Maximum *	2.5	2 20%	2.3 8%	3.8 -52%	2.3 8%	2.55 ?(1.62 - 6.64, n=17) -2%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 35%
Load Average *	4.5	3.5 22%	5 -11%	5.4 -20%	4.8 -7%	4.32 ?(2.9 - 9.6, n=17) 4%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -23%
Load Maximum *	5.5	4.3 22%	6.3 -15%	5.7 -4%	6.5 -18%	5.5 ?(4.3 - 7.34, n=17) -0%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -51%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		26tim 04min
WiFi Websurfing		12tim 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		15tim 16min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		3tim 33min

	Xiaomi Redmi Go 3000 mAh	Nokia 1 2150 mAh	Wiko Jerry 3 2500 mAh	Honor 7S 3020 mAh	Blackview A20 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-26%	-47%	12%	-26%
Reader / Idle	1564
H.264	916
WiFi v1.3	749	552 -26%	394 -47%	840 12%	556 -26%
Load	213

För

+ bra förhållande mellan pris och prestanda

+ bra batteritid

+ trevligt minne för sin klass

+ jämförelsevis många LTE-band

+ dedikerad microSD-plats

+ skaplig röstkvalitet

Emot

- ont om internt minne

- Android Go med bloatware från tillverkaren

- i en del länder finns ingen garanti från tillverkaren

- ganska mörk skärm

Omdöme – Lågt pris utan att vara Billig

Recenseras: Xiaomi Redmi Go. Recensionsex från Xiaomi Austria.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Xiaomi Redmi Go överraskar igen: Till ett riktigt lågt pris får man mer än man förväntar sig. Detta inkluderar högre prestanda, fler LTE-band och en bättre kamera än vad som är typiskt för den här klassen. Dessutom är chassit ganska stabilt och den har skaplig batteritid. Batteriet går dock inte att byta ut, vilket går på många andra billiga smartphones.

Det är synd att Xiaomi fyllde Googles smala Android Go med bloatware i form av en extra programstartare och förinstallerade appar: Med bara 8 GB internt minne räknas varje MB. Men det går ändå att utöka minnet på ett bekvämt sätt med ett microSD-kort, vilket till och med ger en trevlig respons. Dessutom går det att använda två SIM-kort samtidigt.

Xiaomi Redmi Go känns betydligt snabbare och mer prisvärd än priset antyder.

För att svara på vår ursprungliga fråga: Ja, det är en bingo - eller heter det bara bingo? Oavsett så sätter Xiaomi Redmi Go återigen en ny standard, till och med bland de billigaste telefonerna. Den som inte har så höga krav och kan tänka sig att omfamna den aningen oklara garantisituationen som råder i en del länder kommer att få mycket prestanda för pengarna.

Xiaomi Redmi Go - 2019-03-14 03/14/2019 v6^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Design

68%

Tangentbord

65 / 75 → 87%

Mus

91%

Anslutningar

35 / 60 → 58%

Vikt

93%

Batteri

96%

Skärm

82%

Spelprestanda

6 / 63 → 9%

Programprestanda

31 / 70 → 44%

Temperatur

87%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

55 / 91 → 60%

Camera

59%

Medel

67%

79%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Redmi Go Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Schmitt, 2019-04- 1 (Update: 2019-04- 2)

Test: Xiaomi Redmi Go Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Arena of Valor

Shadow Fight 3

Xiaomi Redmi Go audio analysis

Nokia 1 audio analysis

För

Emot

Omdöme – Lågt pris utan att vara Billig

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare