Notebookcheck

Test: Huawei Y6 2018 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Wimmer (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 05/30/2018

Fortfarande billig. Huawei Y6 2018 är en enhet som ger mycket styrka för pengarna. Den ser modern ut och har en hyfsad skärm, men kan den krönas till kung över budgetenheterna?

Huawei Y6 2018 (Y Serie)
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 308
Minne
2048 MB 
Skärm
5.7 tum 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixlar 282 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD-kort upp till 256 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Närhetssensor, Positionssensor, USB-OTG
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.8 x 152.4 x 73
Batteri
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix Kontrast-Autofokus (AF), LED-blixt, Video i upp till 1080p/30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix LED-blixt
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare på enhetens undersida, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Laddare, USB-kabel, SIM-Verktyg, HiCare, Game Suite, Phone Clone, App Gallery, Tips, Teman, 24 Månader Garanti, Bandbredd Nerladdning/Uppladdning: 150 Mbps/50 Mbps LTE; SAR-värden: 0.31 W/kg (Huvud), 0.5 W/kg (Kropp), fanless
Vikt
150 g, Strömförsörjning: 50 g
Pris
149 Kr

 

Huawei Y6 2018
Huawei Y6 2018
Huawei Y6 2018
Huawei Y6 2018
Huawei Y6 2018
Huawei Y6 2018
Huawei Y6 2018

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BQ Aquaris VS
Adreno 505, 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s ∼100% +454%
Average of class Smartphone
  (30.5 - 939, n=243)
189 MBit/s ∼68% +274%
Motorola Moto G5s
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s ∼43% +140%
Nokia 2
Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 8 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 MBit/s ∼20% +10%
Huawei Y6 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50.5 MBit/s ∼18%
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
43.6 MBit/s ∼16% -14%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BQ Aquaris VS
Adreno 505, 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash
230 MBit/s ∼100% +341%
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 703, n=243)
185 MBit/s ∼80% +254%
Motorola Moto G5s
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
111 MBit/s ∼48% +113%
Nokia 2
Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 8 GB eMMC Flash
54.2 MBit/s ∼24% +4%
Huawei Y6 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.2 MBit/s ∼23%
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s ∼21% -7%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – wooded areas
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – wooded areas
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Huawei Y6 2018 – overview
GPS Huawei Y6 2018 – overview
GPS Huawei Y6 2018 – wooded areas
GPS Huawei Y6 2018 – wooded areas
GPS Huawei Y6 2018 – bridge
GPS Huawei Y6 2018 – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
ColorChecker: The target color is in the bottom half of each area.
ColorChecker: The target color is in the bottom half of each area.
Photograph of our test chart.
Photograph of our test chart.
Test chart in detail.
Test chart in detail.
442
cd/m²
482
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 492 cd/m² Medel: 459.8 cd/m² Minimum: 4.2 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 444 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1208:1 (Svärta: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 4.42
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
93.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.6
Huawei Y6 2018
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Nokia 2
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Motorola Moto G5s
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
BQ Aquaris VS
IPS, 1280x720, 5.2
Huawei Y6 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Screen
-8%
6%
-1%
37%
Brightness middle
483
527
9%
490
1%
535
11%
438
-9%
Brightness
460
503
9%
502
9%
544
18%
432
-6%
Brightness Distribution
88
91
3%
92
5%
88
0%
90
2%
Black Level *
0.4
0.68
-70%
0.43
-8%
0.61
-53%
0.13
67%
Contrast
1208
775
-36%
1140
-6%
877
-27%
3369
179%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.8
5.3
9%
5.7
2%
5.3
9%
4.8
17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
12.6
9.2
27%
7.8
38%
11.1
12%
11.4
10%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.42
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5
5.8
-16%
4.7
6%
4
20%
3.2
36%
Gamma
2.6 92%
2.12 113%
2.4 100%
1.95 123%
2.23 108%
CCT
7709 84%
7894 82%
7526 86%
6800 96%
7090 92%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8895 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.8 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
23.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 9.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.4 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
39089 Points ∼55%
Nokia 2
24924 Points ∼35% -36%
Motorola Moto G5s
46370 Points ∼65% +19%
BQ Aquaris VS
44022 Points ∼62% +13%
Huawei Y6 2017
40981 Points ∼58% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (30924 - 39089, n=9)
36284 Points ∼51% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 230642, n=336)
70824 Points ∼100% +81%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
46710 Points ∼45%
BQ Aquaris VS
56906 Points ∼55% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (32557 - 46710, n=5)
42250 Points ∼41% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 290397, n=113)
103239 Points ∼100% +121%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
3629 Points ∼81%
Nokia 2
2304 Points ∼52% -37%
Motorola Moto G5s
3604 Points ∼81% -1%
BQ Aquaris VS
3648 Points ∼82% +1%
Huawei Y6 2017
3487 Points ∼78% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2986 - 3629, n=9)
3335 Points ∼75% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (3138 - 8601, n=201)
4453 Points ∼100% +23%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
4756 Points ∼100%
Nokia 2
3109 Points ∼65% -35%
Motorola Moto G5s
4669 Points ∼98% -2%
BQ Aquaris VS
4751 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei Y6 2017
4607 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3961 - 4813, n=9)
4528 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2516 - 10264, n=365)
4677 Points ∼98% -2%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
616 Points ∼84%
Nokia 2
9 Points ∼1% -99%
Motorola Moto G5s
703 Points ∼96% +14%
BQ Aquaris VS
680 Points ∼93% +10%
Huawei Y6 2017
734 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (616 - 802, n=9)
703 Points ∼96% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=441)
672 Points ∼92% +9%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
443 Points ∼29%
Nokia 2
251 Points ∼17% -43%
Motorola Moto G5s
723 Points ∼48% +63%
BQ Aquaris VS
786 Points ∼52% +77%
Huawei Y6 2017
386 Points ∼26% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (436 - 447, n=9)
441 Points ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=441)
1505 Points ∼100% +240%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
1069 Points ∼83%
Nokia 2
233 Points ∼18% -78%
Motorola Moto G5s
656 Points ∼51% -39%
BQ Aquaris VS
773 Points ∼60% -28%
Huawei Y6 2017
1288 Points ∼100% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (582 - 1372, n=9)
807 Points ∼63% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=441)
1124 Points ∼87% +5%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
1043 Points ∼46%
Nokia 2
901 Points ∼40% -14%
Motorola Moto G5s
1553 Points ∼69% +49%
BQ Aquaris VS
1544 Points ∼69% +48%
Huawei Y6 2017
1354 Points ∼60% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1043 - 1477, n=9)
1310 Points ∼58% +26%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=441)
2244 Points ∼100% +115%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
743 Points ∼66%
Nokia 2
149 Points ∼13% -80%
Motorola Moto G5s
848 Points ∼75% +14%
BQ Aquaris VS
894 Points ∼79% +20%
Huawei Y6 2017
839 Points ∼74% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (371 - 891, n=9)
717 Points ∼63% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=444)
1134 Points ∼100% +53%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
1419 Points ∼37%
Motorola Moto G5s
1871 Points ∼49% +32%
BQ Aquaris VS
1808 Points ∼47% +27%
Huawei Y6 2017
1238 Points ∼32% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1113 - 1460, n=7)
1321 Points ∼34% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14362, n=138)
3831 Points ∼100% +170%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
1939 Points ∼49%
Nokia 2
1118 Points ∼28% -42%
Motorola Moto G5s
2270 Points ∼57% +17%
BQ Aquaris VS
2400 Points ∼60% +24%
Huawei Y6 2017
1903 Points ∼48% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1737 - 1939, n=9)
1867 Points ∼47% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1131 - 10558, n=185)
3970 Points ∼100% +105%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
692 Points ∼59%
Nokia 2
423 Points ∼36% -39%
Motorola Moto G5s
630 Points ∼54% -9%
BQ Aquaris VS
657 Points ∼56% -5%
Huawei Y6 2017
680 Points ∼58% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (642 - 692, n=9)
673 Points ∼57% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4265, n=186)
1175 Points ∼100% +70%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
907 Points ∼62%
Nokia 2
539 Points ∼37% -41%
Motorola Moto G5s
1158 Points ∼80% +28%
BQ Aquaris VS
1145 Points ∼79% +26%
Huawei Y6 2017
967 Points ∼66% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (622 - 907, n=9)
859 Points ∼59% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (524 - 3642, n=321)
1455 Points ∼100% +60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
55 Points ∼4%
Nokia 2
120 Points ∼8% +118%
Motorola Moto G5s
483 Points ∼34% +778%
BQ Aquaris VS
533 Points ∼37% +869%
Huawei Y6 2017
221 Points ∼15% +302%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (31 - 55, n=9)
44 Points ∼3% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 8312, n=321)
1426 Points ∼100% +2493%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
70 Points ∼6%
Nokia 2
120 Points ∼10% +71%
Motorola Moto G5s
555 Points ∼45% +693%
BQ Aquaris VS
605 Points ∼49% +764%
Huawei Y6 2017
267 Points ∼22% +281%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (39 - 70, n=9)
55.9 Points ∼5% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 6378, n=329)
1227 Points ∼100% +1653%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
10344 Points ∼85%
Nokia 2
7150 Points ∼59% -31%
Motorola Moto G5s
9045 Points ∼74% -13%
BQ Aquaris VS
9067 Points ∼75% -12%
Huawei Y6 2017
11088 Points ∼91% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (6656 - 10556, n=9)
10014 Points ∼82% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (5462 - 36494, n=476)
12164 Points ∼100% +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
5426 Points ∼35%
Nokia 2
4150 Points ∼27% -24%
Motorola Moto G5s
9626 Points ∼62% +77%
BQ Aquaris VS
10271 Points ∼66% +89%
Huawei Y6 2017
6184 Points ∼40% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2546 - 5547, n=9)
5164 Points ∼33% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=476)
15585 Points ∼100% +187%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
6067 Points ∼45%
Nokia 2
4577 Points ∼34% -25%
Motorola Moto G5s
9491 Points ∼70% +56%
BQ Aquaris VS
9977 Points ∼74% +64%
Huawei Y6 2017
6858 Points ∼51% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2951 - 6186, n=9)
5783 Points ∼43% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=477)
13472 Points ∼100% +122%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
7.7 fps ∼29%
Nokia 2
5.4 fps ∼20% -30%
Motorola Moto G5s
16 fps ∼59% +108%
BQ Aquaris VS
18 fps ∼67% +134%
Huawei Y6 2017
11 fps ∼41% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3.4 - 7.8, n=9)
7.21 fps ∼27% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=502)
27 fps ∼100% +251%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
14 fps ∼60%
Nokia 2
9.6 fps ∼41% -31%
Motorola Moto G5s
16 fps ∼68% +14%
BQ Aquaris VS
21 fps ∼89% +50%
Huawei Y6 2017
17 fps ∼72% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (6.4 - 14, n=9)
12.8 fps ∼54% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=505)
23.5 fps ∼100% +68%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
2.8 fps ∼19%
Nokia 2
1.6 fps ∼11% -43%
Motorola Moto G5s
7.1 fps ∼49% +154%
BQ Aquaris VS
7.7 fps ∼53% +175%
Huawei Y6 2017
3.9 fps ∼27% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1.3 - 2.8, n=9)
2.62 fps ∼18% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=425)
14.4 fps ∼100% +414%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
5.9 fps ∼39%
Nokia 2
4.4 fps ∼29% -25%
Motorola Moto G5s
7.4 fps ∼49% +25%
BQ Aquaris VS
15 fps ∼100% +154%
Huawei Y6 2017
8.1 fps ∼54% +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3.7 - 6.4, n=9)
5.61 fps ∼37% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=427)
14.5 fps ∼97% +146%

Legend

 
Huawei Y6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris VS Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 2017 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (11.4 - 224, n=360)
33.7 Points ∼100% +82%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
18.661 Points ∼55% +1%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
18.55 Points ∼55%
BQ Aquaris VS (Chrome 65)
18.125 Points ∼54% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (15.9 - 18.7, n=8)
17.8 Points ∼53% -4%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
17.643 Points ∼52% -5%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)
11.607 Points ∼34% -37%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=496)
5011 Points ∼100% +94%
BQ Aquaris VS (Chrome 65)
3296 Points ∼66% +28%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
3092 Points ∼62% +20%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
3035 Points ∼61% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2582 - 3289, n=9)
2970 Points ∼59% +15%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
2582 Points ∼52%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)
1948 Points ∼39% -25%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)
19274.5 ms * ∼100% -19%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
16192.4 ms * ∼84%
BQ Aquaris VS (Chrome 65)
13612 ms * ∼71% +16%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
13057 ms * ∼68% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (10742 - 16192, n=9)
12912 ms * ∼67% +20%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
12254.8 ms * ∼64% +24%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=515)
11883 ms * ∼62% +27%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=246)
99.4 Points ∼100% +40%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
71 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (62 - 79, n=5)
68.6 Points ∼69% -3%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
65 Points ∼65% -8%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
61 Points ∼61% -14%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Y6 2018Nokia 2Motorola Moto G5sBQ Aquaris VSHuawei Y6 2017Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-24%
72%
28%
-4%
-37%
-5%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
61.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
62.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
59.41 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
26.4
-59%
36.9 (6.38 - 65.4, n=103)
-42%
43.8 (6.38 - 87.1, n=270)
-32%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
81.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
84.11 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
83.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
48.4
-43%
55.3 (10.8 - 87.7, n=103)
-35%
62.1 (10.8 - 96.5, n=270)
-27%
Random Write 4KB
9
8.1
-10%
46.2
413%
6.4
-29%
20.54
128%
7.24 (0.49 - 37.9, n=217)
-20%
13.5 (0.14 - 164, n=549)
50%
Random Read 4KB
38.8
17.44
-55%
40.6
5%
47.2
22%
25.93
-33%
19.7 (2.49 - 61.7, n=217)
-49%
34.5 (1.59 - 173, n=549)
-11%
Sequential Write 256KB
65.6
50.77
-23%
77.5
18%
185.9
183%
66.88
2%
40.8 (8.74 - 97.6, n=217)
-38%
71.7 (2.99 - 228, n=549)
9%
Sequential Read 256KB
254.3
131.15
-48%
259
2%
254.4
0%
202.55
-20%
156 (9.66 - 294, n=217)
-39%
211 (12.1 - 832, n=549)
-17%
Shadow Fight 3
 InställningarVärde
 high39 fps
 minimal41.5 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 InställningarVärde
 min31 fps
 high HD30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Hög belastning
 35.6 °C31.6 °C30.5 °C 
 35.8 °C31.2 °C31.5 °C 
 33.8 °C31.1 °C32.6 °C 
Max: 35.8 °C
Medel: 32.6 °C
28.8 °C29.7 °C33 °C
29 °C29.8 °C31.4 °C
28.9 °C30 °C31.3 °C
Max: 33 °C
Medel: 30.2 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  38.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.336.22535.645.23131.341.94037.232.8503835.6632825.78026.525.710024.624.112522.523.61602131.520020.243.825019.648.331518.352.440017.157.250016.75963016.260.980016.262.5100015.467.1125015.269.5160015.272.220001573.125001574.1315015.375.5400015.374.4500015.273.8630015.272800015.372.31000015.471.31250015.258.81600015.241.6SPL27.884.2N155.7median 15.4Huawei Y6 2018median 62.5Delta1.813.229.629.929.627.928.927.928.83028.836.647.836.630.534.230.525.726.325.724.528.524.528.131.728.138.536.238.530.423.430.436.121.736.14020.74043.919.643.947.52147.553.820.253.859.818.759.864.718.864.765.717.665.767.117.667.169.516.869.570.116.370.172.816.472.873.916.173.975.916.275.973.81673.870.315.970.370.216.170.273.61673.668.815.868.853.815.953.883.429.983.452.11.452.1median 65.7Huawei Y6 2017median 17.6median 65.711.52.711.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei Y6 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Y6 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.5 / 1.2 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.7 / 2.5 / 3.2 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 5.2 / 6.8 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Y6 2018
3000 mAh
Nokia 2
4100 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris VS
3100 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
46%
33%
41%
9%
32%
Idle Minimum *
1.7
0.55
68%
0.67
61%
0.61
64%
1.344 (0.54 - 4.02, n=9)
21%
0.866 (0.2 - 3.4, n=576)
49%
Idle Average *
2.5
1.02
59%
1.4
44%
1.7
32%
2.68 (1.5 - 6, n=9)
-7%
1.697 (0.6 - 6.2, n=575)
32%
Idle Maximum *
3.2
1.09
66%
1.52
52%
1.71
47%
2.98 (1.62 - 6.64, n=9)
7%
1.945 (0.74 - 6.6, n=576)
39%
Load Average *
5.2
4.48
14%
4.56
12%
3.02
42%
4.72 (2.9 - 9.6, n=9)
9%
3.97 (0.8 - 10.8, n=570)
24%
Load Maximum *
6.8
5.32
22%
7.05
-4%
5.31
22%
5.74 (4.3 - 7.34, n=9)
16%
5.6 (1.2 - 14.2, n=570)
18%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
22tim 9min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10tim 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11tim 42min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 39min
Huawei Y6 2018
3000 mAh
Nokia 2
4100 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris VS
3100 mAh
Huawei Y6 2017
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
31%
-13%
6%
6%
Reader / Idle
1329
1233
-7%
1522
15%
H.264
702
645
-8%
693
-1%
WiFi v1.3
643
840
31%
518
-19%
681
6%
654
2%
Load
279
225
-19%
302
8%

För

+ tunt hölje som ser modernt ut
+ högtalarna låter bra
+ håller sig sval
+ skärm med hög kontrast
+ billig

Emot

- ingen kompass, ingen fingeravtrycksläsare
- liten mängd intern lagring
- ingen 5 GHz WiFi
- mikrofonen slår av i handsfree-läge
- sporadisk ryckighet
- hög energiförbrukning
Huawei Y6 2018 recenseras: testenhet från Huawei Deutschland.
Huawei Y6 2018 recenseras: testenhet från Huawei Deutschland.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Huawei Y6 2018 är ett bra paket för ett billigt pris. Även om det går att spendera mer pengar på andra enheter kommer dom inte nödvändigtvis ha fler funktioner än vad Y6 2018 erbjuder. Y6 2018 levererar bra prestanda för pengarna. Skärmen är relativt ljusstark och har ett bra kontrastförhållande samtidigt som dess GPS är tillräckligt exakt för att använda Google Maps. Kamerorna tar även godkända bilder. Vidare låter högtalarna bra och enheten håller sig för det mesta sval vid belastning.

Det finns naturligtvis en del nackdelar hos en enhet för under 1 500 kronor: det finns ingen fingeravtrycksläsare eller kompass, energiförbrukningen är hög och det händer att ryckighet stör upplevelsen för användaren.

Huawei Y6 2018 är en bra enhet för den som vill spara lite pengar. Men förvänta dig inte mirakel.

Även om priset begränsar det beröm vi kan ge så får Y6 2018 ändå en rekommendation från oss. Huawei Y6 2018 ger helt enkelt bra prestanda och valuta för pengarna.

Huawei Y6 2018 - 05/17/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Design
79%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
78%
Anslutningar
35 / 60 → 59%
Vikt
92%
Batteri
93%
Skärm
83%
Spelprestanda
7 / 63 → 10%
Programprestanda
40 / 70 → 57%
Temperatur
93%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 61%
Camera
67%
Medel
68%
79%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Huawei Y6 2018 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Florian Wimmer, 2018-05-30 (Update: 2018-05-30)