Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Honor 7A Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Extremt billig. Med 7A utlovar Honor en billig smartphone med en stor skärm. Dessutom har denna telefon några speciella funktioner såsom dual-SIM med en separat microSD-kortläsare och ett surround-läge. I vårt test får du reda på huruvida dessa bara är gimmicks eller om Honor 7A kan övertyga på riktigt.
Honor 7A (7 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 8 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Minne
3 GB 
Skärm
5.70 tum 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixlar 282 PPI, kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 11.4 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 256 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: accelerationssensor, närhetssensor, kompass, USB OTG
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (3/7/20/28/38/39/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.8 x 152.4 x 73
Batteri
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix kontrast-AF, LED-blixt, video @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.2, LED-blixt
Övrigt
Högtalare: monohögtalare på telefonens nedre kant, Tangentbord: virtuellt tangentbord, Laddare, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Honor, HiCare, game suite, 24 Månader Garanti, FM-radio, SAR-värden: 0.26 W/​kg (huvud), 0.88 W/​kg (kropp), LTE Cat 4 (50 Mbit/s uppladdning, 150 Mbit/s nedladdning), fanless
Vikt
150 g, Strömförsörjning: 49 g
Pris
139 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Honor 7A
Honor 7A
Honor 7A
Honor 7A
Honor 7A

Size Comparison

155 mm 77.5 mm 9.6 mm 198 g152.4 mm 73 mm 7.8 mm 150 g152.4 mm 73 mm 7.8 mm 150 g151 mm 74 mm 8.7 mm 180 g145.1 mm 69.1 mm 8.9 mm 173 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Sony Xperia L1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
88.6 MBit/s +90%
Umidigi A1 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.8 MBit/s +19%
Huawei Y6 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.2 MBit/s +12%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.8 MBit/s 0%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.7 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s +736%
Sony Xperia L1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
92.2 MBit/s +105%
Umidigi A1 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s +24%
Huawei Y6 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50.5 MBit/s +12%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
42.1 MBit/s -6%
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Översikt
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Översikt
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Skog
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Skog
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Bro
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Bro
Honor 7A GPS – Översikt
Honor 7A GPS – Översikt
Honor 7A GPS – Skog
Honor 7A GPS – Skog
Honor 7A GPS – Bro
Honor 7A GPS – Bro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
408
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
367
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 417 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 394.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.4 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 417 cd/m²
Kontrast: 2317:1 (Svärta: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
89.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.423
Honor 7A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.70
Huawei Y6 2018
IPS, 1440x720, 5.70
Umidigi A1 Pro
IPS, 1440x720, 5.50
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.50
Sony Xperia L1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.50
Screen
-17%
-2%
-9%
-19%
Brightness middle
417
483
16%
594
42%
425
2%
479
15%
Brightness
395
460
16%
570
44%
425
8%
478
21%
Brightness Distribution
88
88
0%
86
-2%
93
6%
94
7%
Black Level *
0.18
0.4
-122%
0.22
-22%
0.37
-106%
0.58
-222%
Contrast
2317
1208
-48%
2700
17%
1149
-50%
826
-64%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.46
5.8
10%
6.63
-3%
4.7
27%
4.5
30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.72
12.6
-18%
13.99
-31%
8.3
23%
7.5
30%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.8
5
14%
9.2
-59%
4.6
21%
4.1
29%
Gamma
2.423 91%
2.6 85%
2.24 98%
2.17 101%
2.03 108%
CCT
7839 83%
7709 84%
8663 75%
7445 87%
7139 91%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.42

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected ≤ 25 % brightness setting

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 32 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
46126 Points
Huawei Y6 2018
39089 Points -15%
Umidigi A1 Pro
36073 Points -22%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
30619 Points -34%
Sony Xperia L1
37495 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (42798 - 47066, n=16)
45027 Points -2%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
59990 Points
Huawei Y6 2018
46710 Points -22%
Umidigi A1 Pro
45868 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (44992 - 59990, n=11)
56835 Points -5%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
5109 Points
Huawei Y6 2018
4756 Points -7%
Umidigi A1 Pro
4330 Points -15%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3624 Points -29%
Sony Xperia L1
4285 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (3347 - 5290, n=18)
4577 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)
15091 Points +195%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
3892 Points
Huawei Y6 2018
3629 Points -7%
Umidigi A1 Pro
3159 Points -19%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
2768 Points -29%
Sony Xperia L1
3237 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (3408 - 3892, n=16)
3668 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)
10872 Points +179%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 7A
1055 Points
Huawei Y6 2018
743 Points -30%
Umidigi A1 Pro
208 Points -80%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
536 Points -49%
Sony Xperia L1
744 Points -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (263 - 1055, n=17)
737 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points +446%
System (sort by value)
Honor 7A
1962 Points
Huawei Y6 2018
1043 Points -47%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1318 Points -33%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1086 Points -45%
Sony Xperia L1
1338 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (1281 - 2154, n=17)
1726 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points +393%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 7A
1209 Points
Huawei Y6 2018
1069 Points -12%
Umidigi A1 Pro
802 Points -34%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
591 Points -51%
Sony Xperia L1
798 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (530 - 1209, n=17)
769 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points +418%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 7A
739 Points
Huawei Y6 2018
443 Points -40%
Umidigi A1 Pro
184 Points -75%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
208 Points -72%
Sony Xperia L1
386 Points -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (715 - 788, n=17)
738 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points +1824%
Web (sort by value)
Honor 7A
705 Points
Huawei Y6 2018
616 Points -13%
Umidigi A1 Pro
10 Points -99%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
620 Points -12%
Sony Xperia L1
743 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (10 - 866, n=17)
499 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points +112%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
675 Points
Huawei Y6 2018
692 Points +3%
Umidigi A1 Pro
665 Points -1%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
556 Points -18%
Sony Xperia L1
674 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (619 - 685, n=16)
657 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)
5228 Points +675%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
2820 Points
Huawei Y6 2018
1939 Points -31%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1852 Points -34%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1562 Points -45%
Sony Xperia L1
1875 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2222 - 2889, n=16)
2553 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)
14045 Points +398%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
2127 Points
Huawei Y6 2018
1419 Points -33%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1450 Points -32%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
952 Points -55%
Sony Xperia L1
1241 Points -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (1731 - 2461, n=13)
2118 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)
10872 Points +411%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
9584 Points
Huawei Y6 2018
6067 Points -37%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3692 Points -61%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3692 Points -61%
Sony Xperia L1
6669 Points -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (9213 - 9977, n=18)
9559 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
9684 Points
Huawei Y6 2018
5426 Points -44%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3183 Points -67%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3183 Points -67%
Sony Xperia L1
6015 Points -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (9342 - 10271, n=17)
9707 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 7A
9249 Points
Huawei Y6 2018
10344 Points +12%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
8390 Points -9%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
8390 Points -9%
Sony Xperia L1
10767 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (8253 - 10364, n=17)
9093 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 7A
613 Points
Huawei Y6 2018
70 Points -89%
Umidigi A1 Pro
168 Points -73%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
163 Points -73%
Sony Xperia L1
285 Points -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (554 - 613, n=18)
583 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)
3766 Points +514%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 7A
535 Points
Huawei Y6 2018
55 Points -90%
Umidigi A1 Pro
140 Points -74%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
133 Points -75%
Sony Xperia L1
238 Points -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (483 - 535, n=18)
509 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)
4186 Points +682%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 7A
1259 Points
Huawei Y6 2018
907 Points -28%
Umidigi A1 Pro
537 Points -57%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
753 Points -40%
Sony Xperia L1
939 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (1002 - 1339, n=18)
1182 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)
3082 Points +145%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 7A
308 Points
Huawei Y6 2018
Points -100%
Umidigi A1 Pro
108 Points -65%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
99 Points -68%
Sony Xperia L1
184 Points -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (284 - 330, n=18)
303 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=105, last 2 years)
2755 Points +794%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 7A
254 Points
Huawei Y6 2018
Points -100%
Umidigi A1 Pro
88 Points -65%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
79 Points -69%
Sony Xperia L1
149 Points -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (234 - 271, n=18)
250 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=105, last 2 years)
2751 Points +983%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 7A
1232 Points
Huawei Y6 2018
Points -100%
Umidigi A1 Pro
531 Points -57%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
783 Points -36%
Sony Xperia L1
968 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (1034 - 1360, n=18)
1178 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=105, last 2 years)
3163 Points +157%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 7A
27 fps
Huawei Y6 2018
14 fps -48%
Umidigi A1 Pro
9.7 fps -64%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
11 fps -59%
Sony Xperia L1
19 fps -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (14 - 27, n=17)
20.6 fps -24%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)
84.6 fps +213%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 7A
16 fps
Huawei Y6 2018
7.7 fps -52%
Umidigi A1 Pro
6 fps -62%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
6 fps -62%
Sony Xperia L1
11 fps -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (15 - 18, n=17)
16.3 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)
247 fps +1444%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 7A
14 fps
Huawei Y6 2018
5.9 fps -58%
Umidigi A1 Pro
5.4 fps -61%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
4.8 fps -66%
Sony Xperia L1
8.8 fps -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (6.6 - 15, n=17)
10.8 fps -23%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)
72.2 fps +416%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 7A
7.1 fps
Huawei Y6 2018
2.8 fps -61%
Umidigi A1 Pro
2.7 fps -62%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
2.2 fps -69%
Sony Xperia L1
4.1 fps -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (6.7 - 7.7, n=17)
7.14 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)
140.6 fps +1880%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 7A
10 fps
Huawei Y6 2018
fps -100%
Umidigi A1 Pro
3.3 fps -67%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3.4 fps -66%
Sony Xperia L1
6.3 fps -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (4.3 - 11, n=17)
7.58 fps -24%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)
60.9 fps +509%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 7A
4.6 fps
Huawei Y6 2018
fps -100%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1.6 fps -65%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1.4 fps -70%
Sony Xperia L1
2.6 fps -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2.2 - 4.9, n=17)
4.19 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)
99 fps +2052%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 7A
5.4 fps
Huawei Y6 2018
fps -100%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1.4 fps -74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2.4 - 5.9, n=17)
4.05 fps -25%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)
43.4 fps +704%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 7A
2.6 fps
Huawei Y6 2018
fps -100%
Umidigi A1 Pro
0.9 fps -65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2.4 - 2.7, n=17)
2.55 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)
59.9 fps +2204%

Legend

 
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Umidigi A1 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia L1 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)
104.3 Points +467%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (17.6 - 21.5, n=16)
19.1 Points +4%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
18.55 Points +1%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
18.39 Points
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
17.86 Points -3%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
17.37 Points -6%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
14.55 Points -21%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)
33503 Points +889%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
3389 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2604 - 3438, n=18)
3194 Points -6%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
3191 Points -6%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
2684 Points -21%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
2582 Points -24%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
2273 Points -33%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
17405 ms * -18%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
16192 ms * -10%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
15718 ms * -7%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
14709 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (10396 - 14709, n=18)
12677 ms * +14%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
12507 ms * +15%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * +89%

* ... smaller is better

Honor 7A Huawei Y6 2018Umidigi A1 ProLenovo Moto E4 PlusSony Xperia L1Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-3%
-11%
8%
-49%
-34%
1315%
Sequential Read 256KB
254.8
254.3
0%
269.2
6%
194.4
-24%
181.9
-29%
164.5 ?(9.66 - 294, n=256)
-35%
Sequential Write 256KB
72.5
65.6
-10%
44.4
-39%
42
-42%
40.2
-45%
Random Read 4KB
39.2
38.8
-1%
29.6
-24%
19.15
-51%
13.6
-65%
Random Write 4KB
9.4
9
-4%
10.2
9%
29.4
213%
5.9
-37%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
81 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
66.3
-22%
37.81 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-55%
59.1 ?(8.1 - 87.7, n=137)
-30%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
58.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-10%
46.6
-29%
26.25 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-60%
Hög belastning
 41.9 °C38.3 °C37.8 °C 
 41 °C38.1 °C39 °C 
 39.3 °C37.5 °C37.1 °C 
Max: 41.9 °C
Medel: 38.9 °C
35.6 °C38.3 °C42.3 °C
35.5 °C38.3 °C41.2 °C
35.6 °C37.8 °C39.1 °C
Max: 42.3 °C
Medel: 38.2 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  36.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.646.32538.438.73134.231.34037.326.5503031.86326.6288023.222.410021.221.11252121.616016.326.420016.636.725015.841.231513.546.340012.251.65001252.663011.75580010.558.710009.661.612509.563.61600965.320008.567.425008.569.231508.371.340008.269.350008.167.663008.165.180008.162.3100008.264.4125008.353.3160008.235.2SPL65.451.721.959.978.6N19.17.10.31239median 9.6median 55median 11.1median 36median 58.8Delta5.514.110.82419.834.336.235.645.231.341.937.232.83835.62825.726.525.724.624.122.523.62131.520.243.819.648.318.352.417.157.216.75916.260.916.262.515.467.115.269.515.272.21573.11574.115.375.515.374.415.273.815.27215.372.315.471.315.258.815.241.627.884.2155.7median 15.4median 62.51.812.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor 7A Huawei Y6 2018
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor 7A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 58.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 58.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 58.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (113.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei Y6 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.05 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.3 / 1.6 / 2.9 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.7 / 6.4 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Umidigi A1 Pro
3150 mAh
Huawei Y6 2018
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
5000 mAh
Sony Xperia L1
2620 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-23%
-29%
20%
-8%
3%
1%
Idle Minimum *
1.3
1.8
-38%
1.7
-31%
0.89
32%
0.89
32%
0.918 ?(0.52 - 1.88, n=18)
29%
Idle Average *
1.6
2.3
-44%
2.5
-56%
1.87
-17%
2.05
-28%
2.01 ?(1.4 - 4.17, n=18)
-26%
Idle Maximum *
2.9
3.2
-10%
3.2
-10%
1.98
32%
2.18
25%
Load Average *
3.7
4.7
-27%
5.2
-41%
3.04
18%
6.02
-63%
Load Maximum *
6.4
6
6%
6.8
-6%
4.01
37%
6.94
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
WiFi Websurfing
10tim 57min
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Umidigi A1 Pro
3150 mAh
Huawei Y6 2018
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
5000 mAh
Sony Xperia L1
2620 mAh
Battery Runtime
-7%
-2%
20%
-14%
WiFi v1.3
657
608
-7%
643
-2%
788
20%
567
-14%
Reader / Idle
1329
1398
H.264
702
656
Load
279
223

För

+ stark prestanda
+ överkomligt pris
+ exakt GPS
+ skärm med hög kontrast
+ lång batteritid

Emot

- långsam WLAN
- skärmen har en blå ton
- skärmen är ganska mörk
- oattraktivt plasthölje
Test av Honor 7A. Recensionsex från notebooksbilliger.de
Test av Honor 7A. Recensionsex från notebooksbilliger.de

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Det är inte dom unika funktionerna som får Honor 7A att stå ut (Finns det egentligen någon som har 7 vänner som alla äger en Honor 7A och som träffar dem för att skapa en surround-system byggt av smartphones?) utan dess smala skärminfattning, höga prestanda, bra batteritid och exakta GPS. Kameran är dessutom acceptabla bilder, även om dom är ganska mörka. På så sätt får Honor 7A poäng för mer grundläggande dygder som gör en nöjd i vardagslivet snarare än för funktioner som passar bra i marknadsföring men som sällan används.

Faktum att Honor 7A är ganska billig gör det än mer imponerande att den presterar bra på så många områden. Det finns förstås också svagheter, som att skärmen inte är särskilt ljusstark, en märkbar blå ton efter leverans och ett plasthölje som är okej men knappast vinner några priser. Men detta är mindre detaljer jämfört med den goda prestationen i dom grundläggande grenarna.

Honor 7A kan övertyga på många områden: Den har bland annat massor av prestanda och bra batteritid till ett överkomligt pris.

Totalt sett är Honor 7A en billig smartphone med ett väldigt bra förhållande mellan pris och prestanda.

Honor 7A - 07/09/2018 v6(old)
Florian Wimmer

Design
69%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
95%
Anslutningar
37 / 60 → 61%
Vikt
92%
Batteri
94%
Skärm
83%
Spelprestanda
20 / 63 → 31%
Programprestanda
44 / 70 → 63%
Temperatur
88%
Ljudnivå
100%
Camera
64%
Medel
71%
82%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Honor 7A Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Florian Wimmer, 2018-07-24 (Update: 2018-07-24)