Notebookcheck

Test: Honor 7A Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Wimmer (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 07/24/2018

Extremt billig. Med 7A utlovar Honor en billig smartphone med en stor skärm. Dessutom har denna telefon några speciella funktioner såsom dual-SIM med en separat microSD-kortläsare och ett surround-läge. I vårt test får du reda på huruvida dessa bara är gimmicks eller om Honor 7A kan övertyga på riktigt.

Honor 7A (7 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Minne
3072 MB 
Skärm
5.7 tum 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixlar 282 PPI, kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 11.4 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 256 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: accelerationssensor, närhetssensor, kompass, USB OTG
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (3/7/20/28/38/39/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.8 x 152.4 x 73
Batteri
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix kontrast-AF, LED-blixt, video @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.2, LED-blixt
Övrigt
Högtalare: monohögtalare på telefonens nedre kant, Tangentbord: virtuellt tangentbord, Laddare, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Honor, HiCare, game suite, 24 Månader Garanti, FM-radio, SAR-värden: 0.26 W/​kg (huvud), 0.88 W/​kg (kropp), LTE Cat 4 (50 Mbit/s uppladdning, 150 Mbit/s nedladdning), fanless
Vikt
150 g, Strömförsörjning: 49 g
Pris
139 Kr

 

Honor 7A
Honor 7A
Honor 7A
Honor 7A
Honor 7A

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (30.5 - 939, n=243)
189 MBit/s ∼100% +320%
Sony Xperia L1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
92.2 MBit/s ∼49% +105%
Umidigi A1 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s ∼29% +24%
Huawei Y6 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50.5 MBit/s ∼27% +12%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45 MBit/s ∼24%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
42.1 MBit/s ∼22% -6%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 703, n=243)
185 MBit/s ∼100% +296%
Sony Xperia L1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
88.6 MBit/s ∼48% +90%
Umidigi A1 Pro
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.8 MBit/s ∼30% +19%
Huawei Y6 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.2 MBit/s ∼28% +12%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.8 MBit/s ∼25% 0%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.7 MBit/s ∼25%
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Översikt
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Översikt
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Skog
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Skog
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Bro
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Bro
Honor 7A GPS – Översikt
Honor 7A GPS – Översikt
Honor 7A GPS – Skog
Honor 7A GPS – Skog
Honor 7A GPS – Bro
Honor 7A GPS – Bro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
408
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
367
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 417 cd/m² Medel: 394.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.4 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 417 cd/m²
Kontrast: 2317:1 (Svärta: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.46 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
89.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.423
Honor 7A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Huawei Y6 2018
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Umidigi A1 Pro
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Sony Xperia L1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Screen
-17%
-2%
-9%
-19%
Brightness middle
417
483
16%
594
42%
425
2%
479
15%
Brightness
395
460
16%
570
44%
425
8%
478
21%
Brightness Distribution
88
88
0%
86
-2%
93
6%
94
7%
Black Level *
0.18
0.4
-122%
0.22
-22%
0.37
-106%
0.58
-222%
Contrast
2317
1208
-48%
2700
17%
1149
-50%
826
-64%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.46
5.8
10%
6.63
-3%
4.7
27%
4.5
30%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.72
12.6
-18%
13.99
-31%
8.3
23%
7.5
30%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.8
5
14%
9.2
-59%
4.6
21%
4.1
29%
Gamma
2.423 99%
2.6 92%
2.24 107%
2.17 111%
2.03 118%
CCT
7839 83%
7709 84%
8663 75%
7445 87%
7139 91%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.42

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected ≤ 25 % brightness setting

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8895 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 32 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41.4 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
46126 Points ∼65%
Huawei Y6 2018
39089 Points ∼55% -15%
Umidigi A1 Pro
36073 Points ∼51% -22%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
30619 Points ∼43% -34%
Sony Xperia L1
37495 Points ∼53% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (42798 - 47066, n=14)
45068 Points ∼64% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 230642, n=336)
70824 Points ∼100% +54%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
59990 Points ∼58%
Huawei Y6 2018
46710 Points ∼45% -22%
Umidigi A1 Pro
45868 Points ∼44% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (44992 - 59990, n=7)
56097 Points ∼54% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 290397, n=113)
103239 Points ∼100% +72%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
3892 Points ∼87%
Huawei Y6 2018
3629 Points ∼81% -7%
Umidigi A1 Pro
3159 Points ∼71% -19%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
2768 Points ∼62% -29%
Sony Xperia L1
3237 Points ∼73% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (3508 - 3892, n=12)
3702 Points ∼83% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (3138 - 8601, n=201)
4453 Points ∼100% +14%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
5109 Points ∼100%
Huawei Y6 2018
4756 Points ∼93% -7%
Umidigi A1 Pro
4330 Points ∼85% -15%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3624 Points ∼71% -29%
Sony Xperia L1
4285 Points ∼84% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (3347 - 5290, n=14)
4629 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2516 - 10264, n=365)
4677 Points ∼92% -8%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Honor 7A
705 Points ∼95%
Huawei Y6 2018
616 Points ∼83% -13%
Umidigi A1 Pro
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
620 Points ∼83% -12%
Sony Xperia L1
743 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (10 - 866, n=14)
461 Points ∼62% -35%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=441)
672 Points ∼90% -5%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 7A
739 Points ∼49%
Huawei Y6 2018
443 Points ∼29% -40%
Umidigi A1 Pro
184 Points ∼12% -75%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
208 Points ∼14% -72%
Sony Xperia L1
386 Points ∼26% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (715 - 788, n=14)
740 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=441)
1505 Points ∼100% +104%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 7A
1209 Points ∼100%
Huawei Y6 2018
1069 Points ∼88% -12%
Umidigi A1 Pro
802 Points ∼66% -34%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
591 Points ∼49% -51%
Sony Xperia L1
798 Points ∼66% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (530 - 1209, n=14)
771 Points ∼64% -36%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=441)
1124 Points ∼93% -7%
System (sort by value)
Honor 7A
1962 Points ∼87%
Huawei Y6 2018
1043 Points ∼46% -47%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1318 Points ∼59% -33%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1086 Points ∼48% -45%
Sony Xperia L1
1338 Points ∼60% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (1281 - 2154, n=14)
1714 Points ∼76% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=441)
2244 Points ∼100% +14%
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 7A
1055 Points ∼93%
Huawei Y6 2018
743 Points ∼66% -30%
Umidigi A1 Pro
208 Points ∼18% -80%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
536 Points ∼47% -49%
Sony Xperia L1
744 Points ∼66% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (263 - 1055, n=14)
701 Points ∼62% -34%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=444)
1134 Points ∼100% +7%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
2127 Points ∼56%
Huawei Y6 2018
1419 Points ∼37% -33%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1450 Points ∼38% -32%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
952 Points ∼25% -55%
Sony Xperia L1
1241 Points ∼32% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (1731 - 2224, n=9)
2029 Points ∼53% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14362, n=138)
3831 Points ∼100% +80%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
2820 Points ∼71%
Huawei Y6 2018
1939 Points ∼49% -31%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1852 Points ∼47% -34%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1562 Points ∼39% -45%
Sony Xperia L1
1875 Points ∼47% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2270 - 2889, n=12)
2593 Points ∼65% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1131 - 10558, n=185)
3970 Points ∼100% +41%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
675 Points ∼57%
Huawei Y6 2018
692 Points ∼59% +3%
Umidigi A1 Pro
665 Points ∼57% -1%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
556 Points ∼47% -18%
Sony Xperia L1
674 Points ∼57% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (619 - 681, n=12)
656 Points ∼56% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4265, n=186)
1175 Points ∼100% +74%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 7A
1232 Points ∼79%
Huawei Y6 2018
Points ∼0% -100%
Umidigi A1 Pro
531 Points ∼34% -57%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
783 Points ∼50% -36%
Sony Xperia L1
968 Points ∼62% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (1034 - 1360, n=14)
1199 Points ∼77% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (530 - 3669, n=290)
1554 Points ∼100% +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 7A
254 Points ∼24%
Huawei Y6 2018
Points ∼0% -100%
Umidigi A1 Pro
88 Points ∼8% -65%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
79 Points ∼7% -69%
Sony Xperia L1
149 Points ∼14% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (240 - 271, n=14)
251 Points ∼24% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (67 - 5220, n=290)
1056 Points ∼100% +316%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 7A
308 Points ∼30%
Huawei Y6 2018
Points ∼0% -100%
Umidigi A1 Pro
108 Points ∼11% -65%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
99 Points ∼10% -68%
Sony Xperia L1
184 Points ∼18% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (290 - 330, n=14)
304 Points ∼30% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (83 - 4732, n=298)
1012 Points ∼100% +229%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 7A
1259 Points ∼87%
Huawei Y6 2018
907 Points ∼62% -28%
Umidigi A1 Pro
537 Points ∼37% -57%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
753 Points ∼52% -40%
Sony Xperia L1
939 Points ∼65% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (1002 - 1339, n=14)
1201 Points ∼83% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (524 - 3642, n=321)
1455 Points ∼100% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 7A
535 Points ∼38%
Huawei Y6 2018
55 Points ∼4% -90%
Umidigi A1 Pro
140 Points ∼10% -74%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
133 Points ∼9% -75%
Sony Xperia L1
238 Points ∼17% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (483 - 535, n=14)
509 Points ∼36% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 8312, n=321)
1426 Points ∼100% +167%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 7A
613 Points ∼50%
Huawei Y6 2018
70 Points ∼6% -89%
Umidigi A1 Pro
168 Points ∼14% -73%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
163 Points ∼13% -73%
Sony Xperia L1
285 Points ∼23% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (554 - 613, n=14)
584 Points ∼48% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 6378, n=329)
1227 Points ∼100% +100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 7A
9249 Points ∼76%
Huawei Y6 2018
10344 Points ∼85% +12%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
8390 Points ∼69% -9%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
8390 Points ∼69% -9%
Sony Xperia L1
10767 Points ∼89% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (8973 - 10364, n=13)
9188 Points ∼76% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (5462 - 36494, n=476)
12164 Points ∼100% +32%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
9684 Points ∼62%
Huawei Y6 2018
5426 Points ∼35% -44%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3183 Points ∼20% -67%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3183 Points ∼20% -67%
Sony Xperia L1
6015 Points ∼39% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (9602 - 10271, n=13)
9751 Points ∼63% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=476)
15585 Points ∼100% +61%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 7A
9584 Points ∼71%
Huawei Y6 2018
6067 Points ∼45% -37%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3692 Points ∼27% -61%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3692 Points ∼27% -61%
Sony Xperia L1
6669 Points ∼50% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (9457 - 9977, n=14)
9611 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=477)
13472 Points ∼100% +41%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 7A
16 fps ∼59%
Huawei Y6 2018
7.7 fps ∼29% -52%
Umidigi A1 Pro
6 fps ∼22% -62%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
6 fps ∼22% -62%
Sony Xperia L1
11 fps ∼41% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (16 - 18, n=14)
16.4 fps ∼61% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=502)
27 fps ∼100% +69%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 7A
27 fps ∼100%
Huawei Y6 2018
14 fps ∼52% -48%
Umidigi A1 Pro
9.7 fps ∼36% -64%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
11 fps ∼41% -59%
Sony Xperia L1
19 fps ∼70% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (14 - 27, n=14)
20.4 fps ∼76% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=505)
23.5 fps ∼87% -13%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 7A
7.1 fps ∼49%
Huawei Y6 2018
2.8 fps ∼19% -61%
Umidigi A1 Pro
2.7 fps ∼19% -62%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
2.2 fps ∼15% -69%
Sony Xperia L1
4.1 fps ∼28% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (7.1 - 7.7, n=14)
7.19 fps ∼50% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=425)
14.4 fps ∼100% +103%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 7A
14 fps ∼97%
Huawei Y6 2018
5.9 fps ∼41% -58%
Umidigi A1 Pro
5.4 fps ∼37% -61%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
4.8 fps ∼33% -66%
Sony Xperia L1
8.8 fps ∼61% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (6.6 - 15, n=14)
10.7 fps ∼74% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=427)
14.5 fps ∼100% +4%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 7A
4.6 fps ∼37%
Huawei Y6 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1.6 fps ∼13% -65%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1.4 fps ∼11% -70%
Sony Xperia L1
2.6 fps ∼21% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2.2 - 4.9, n=14)
4.26 fps ∼34% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=288)
12.5 fps ∼100% +172%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 7A
10 fps ∼79%
Huawei Y6 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
Umidigi A1 Pro
3.3 fps ∼26% -67%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3.4 fps ∼27% -66%
Sony Xperia L1
6.3 fps ∼50% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (4.3 - 11, n=14)
7.49 fps ∼59% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (2.5 - 110, n=290)
12.6 fps ∼100% +26%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 7A
2.6 fps ∼31%
Huawei Y6 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
Umidigi A1 Pro
0.9 fps ∼11% -65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2.5 - 2.7, n=14)
2.55 fps ∼30% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.76 - 35, n=219)
8.51 fps ∼100% +227%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 7A
5.4 fps ∼69%
Huawei Y6 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
Umidigi A1 Pro
1.4 fps ∼18% -74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2.4 - 5.9, n=14)
4.01 fps ∼51% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 50, n=222)
7.82 fps ∼100% +45%

Legend

 
Honor 7A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Umidigi A1 Pro Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia L1 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (11.4 - 224, n=360)
33.7 Points ∼100% +83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (17.6 - 21.5, n=13)
19.3 Points ∼57% +5%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
18.55 Points ∼55% +1%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
18.394 Points ∼55%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
17.857 Points ∼53% -3%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
17.372 Points ∼52% -6%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
14.55 Points ∼43% -21%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=496)
5011 Points ∼100% +48%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
3389 Points ∼68%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
3191 Points ∼64% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2604 - 3438, n=14)
3176 Points ∼63% -6%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
2684 Points ∼54% -21%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
2582 Points ∼52% -24%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
2273 Points ∼45% -33%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
17405 ms * ∼100% -18%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
16192.4 ms * ∼93% -10%
Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66)
15718 ms * ∼90% -7%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
14709 ms * ∼85%
Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59)
12506.5 ms * ∼72% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (10396 - 14709, n=14)
12448 ms * ∼72% +15%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=515)
11883 ms * ∼68% +19%

* ... smaller is better

Honor 7A Huawei Y6 2018Umidigi A1 ProLenovo Moto E4 PlusSony Xperia L1Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-3%
-11%
8%
-49%
-39%
-8%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
58.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-10%
46.6
-29%
26.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-60%
36.9 (6.38 - 65.4, n=103)
-44%
43.8 (6.38 - 87.1, n=270)
-33%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
66.3
-22%
37.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-55%
55.3 (10.8 - 87.7, n=103)
-35%
62.1 (10.8 - 96.5, n=270)
-27%
Random Write 4KB
9.4
9
-4%
10.2
9%
29.4
213%
5.9
-37%
7.24 (0.49 - 37.9, n=217)
-23%
13.5 (0.14 - 164, n=549)
44%
Random Read 4KB
39.2
38.8
-1%
29.6
-24%
19.15
-51%
13.6
-65%
19.7 (2.49 - 61.7, n=217)
-50%
34.5 (1.59 - 173, n=549)
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB
72.5
65.6
-10%
44.4
-39%
42
-42%
40.2
-45%
40.8 (8.74 - 97.6, n=217)
-44%
71.7 (2.99 - 228, n=549)
-1%
Sequential Read 256KB
254.8
254.3
0%
269.2
6%
194.4
-24%
181.9
-29%
156 (9.66 - 294, n=217)
-39%
211 (12.1 - 832, n=549)
-17%
Hög belastning
 41.9 °C38.3 °C37.8 °C 
 41 °C38.1 °C39 °C 
 39.3 °C37.5 °C37.1 °C 
Max: 41.9 °C
Medel: 38.9 °C
35.6 °C38.3 °C42.3 °C
35.5 °C38.3 °C41.2 °C
35.6 °C37.8 °C39.1 °C
Max: 42.3 °C
Medel: 38.2 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  36.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.646.32538.438.73134.231.34037.326.5503031.86326.6288023.222.410021.221.11252121.616016.326.420016.636.725015.841.231513.546.340012.251.65001252.663011.75580010.558.710009.661.612509.563.61600965.320008.567.425008.569.231508.371.340008.269.350008.167.663008.165.180008.162.3100008.264.4125008.353.3160008.235.2SPL65.451.721.959.978.6N19.17.10.31239median 9.5Honor 7A median 58.7Delta2.812.134.336.235.645.231.341.937.232.83835.62825.726.525.724.624.122.523.62131.520.243.819.648.318.352.417.157.216.75916.260.916.262.515.467.115.269.515.272.21573.11574.115.375.515.374.415.273.815.27215.372.315.471.315.258.815.241.627.884.2155.7median 15.4Huawei Y6 2018median 62.51.813.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor 7A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Y6 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.05 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.3 / 1.6 / 2.9 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.7 / 6.4 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Umidigi A1 Pro
3150 mAh
Huawei Y6 2018
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
5000 mAh
Sony Xperia L1
2620 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-23%
-29%
20%
-8%
7%
13%
Idle Minimum *
1.3
1.8
-38%
1.7
-31%
0.89
32%
0.89
32%
0.824 (0.52 - 1.4, n=14)
37%
0.866 (0.2 - 3.4, n=576)
33%
Idle Average *
1.6
2.3
-44%
2.5
-56%
1.87
-17%
2.05
-28%
1.964 (1.4 - 4.17, n=14)
-23%
1.697 (0.6 - 6.2, n=575)
-6%
Idle Maximum *
2.9
3.2
-10%
3.2
-10%
1.98
32%
2.18
25%
2.14 (1.52 - 4.2, n=14)
26%
1.945 (0.74 - 6.6, n=576)
33%
Load Average *
3.7
4.7
-27%
5.2
-41%
3.04
18%
6.02
-63%
3.92 (2.85 - 7.5, n=14)
-6%
3.97 (0.8 - 10.8, n=570)
-7%
Load Maximum *
6.4
6
6%
6.8
-6%
4.01
37%
6.94
-8%
6.37 (4.88 - 13.7, n=14)
-0%
5.6 (1.2 - 14.2, n=570)
12%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10tim 57min
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Umidigi A1 Pro
3150 mAh
Huawei Y6 2018
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
5000 mAh
Sony Xperia L1
2620 mAh
Battery Runtime
-7%
-2%
20%
-14%
Reader / Idle
1329
1398
WiFi v1.3
657
608
-7%
643
-2%
788
20%
567
-14%
Load
279
223
H.264
702
656

För

+ stark prestanda
+ överkomligt pris
+ exakt GPS
+ skärm med hög kontrast
+ lång batteritid

Emot

- långsam WLAN
- skärmen har en blå ton
- skärmen är ganska mörk
- oattraktivt plasthölje
Test av Honor 7A. Recensionsex från notebooksbilliger.de
Test av Honor 7A. Recensionsex från notebooksbilliger.de

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Det är inte dom unika funktionerna som får Honor 7A att stå ut (Finns det egentligen någon som har 7 vänner som alla äger en Honor 7A och som träffar dem för att skapa en surround-system byggt av smartphones?) utan dess smala skärminfattning, höga prestanda, bra batteritid och exakta GPS. Kameran är dessutom acceptabla bilder, även om dom är ganska mörka. På så sätt får Honor 7A poäng för mer grundläggande dygder som gör en nöjd i vardagslivet snarare än för funktioner som passar bra i marknadsföring men som sällan används.

Faktum att Honor 7A är ganska billig gör det än mer imponerande att den presterar bra på så många områden. Det finns förstås också svagheter, som att skärmen inte är särskilt ljusstark, en märkbar blå ton efter leverans och ett plasthölje som är okej men knappast vinner några priser. Men detta är mindre detaljer jämfört med den goda prestationen i dom grundläggande grenarna.

Honor 7A kan övertyga på många områden: Den har bland annat massor av prestanda och bra batteritid till ett överkomligt pris.

Totalt sett är Honor 7A en billig smartphone med ett väldigt bra förhållande mellan pris och prestanda.

Honor 7A - 07/09/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Design
69%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
95%
Anslutningar
37 / 60 → 61%
Vikt
92%
Batteri
94%
Skärm
83%
Spelprestanda
20 / 63 → 31%
Programprestanda
44 / 70 → 63%
Temperatur
88%
Ljudnivå
100%
Camera
64%
Medel
71%
82%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Honor 7A Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Florian Wimmer, 2018-07-24 (Update: 2018-07-24)