Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Xiaomi Redmi S2 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

"S" står för Selfie. Xiaomis Redmi S2 förebådar ankomsten av en telefonserie med högkvalitativa framåtriktade kameror — designade med selfie-fantaster i åtanke. Som av en händelse är den även en av dom billigaste enheterna från denna Kinesiska tillverkare som kommer utrustad med en dual-kamera. Vad mer kan intresserade köpare vänta sig av Xiaomi Redmi S2? Läs vidare för att få reda på det.
Xiaomi Redmi S2 (Redmi Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Minne
4 GB 
Skärm
5.99 tum 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixlar 269 PPI, kapacitiv, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, finns också tillgänglig med 64 GB eMMC-lagring, 24 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infraröd, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5mm, Kortläsare: microSD, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: närhetssensor, accelerationssensor, gyroskop, kompass, Hall-sensor
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (800, 850, 900, 1800, 1900), 3G (850, 900, 1900, 2100), LTE (800, 850, 900, 1700, 1800, 2100, 2300, 2600), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.1 x 160.7 x 77.3
Batteri
3080 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix 12+5MP
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2 högtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, USB-laddare, microUSB-kabel, skyddsfodral i silikon, MIUI V9, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värde (huvud): 0.429 W/kg, (kropp): 1.577 W/kg, fanless
Vikt
170 g, Strömförsörjning: 55 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Redmi S2
Xiaomi Redmi S2
Xiaomi Redmi S2
Xiaomi Redmi S2
Xiaomi Redmi S2
Xiaomi Redmi S2
Xiaomi Redmi S2
Xiaomi Redmi S2
Xiaomi Redmi S2
Xiaomi Redmi S2
Xiaomi Redmi S2

Size Comparison

160.7 mm 77.3 mm 8.1 mm 170 g160 mm 75.5 mm 8 mm 167 g158.3 mm 76.7 mm 7.8 mm 155 g149.9 mm 70.9 mm 7.7 mm 162 g148.8 mm 75.8 mm 8.2 mm 175 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Nokia 6 2018
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
345 MBit/s +589%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
311 MBit/s +521%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
123 MBit/s +146%
Huawei Y7 2018
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
56.9 MBit/s +14%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.1 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s +692%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
310 MBit/s +553%
Nokia 6 2018
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
289 MBit/s +508%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 32 GB eMMC Flash
120 MBit/s +153%
Huawei Y7 2018
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55 MBit/s +16%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.5 MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi S2
Xiaomi Redmi S2
Xiaomi Redmi S2
Xiaomi Redmi S2
Xiaomi Redmi S2
Xiaomi Redmi S2
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520
Garmin Edge 520

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Xiaomi Redmi S2 - Testkarta
Xiaomi Redmi S2 - Testkarta (detalj)
460
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
498
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
509
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
482
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 509 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 483.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.24 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Kontrast: 771:1 (Svärta: 0.65 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
94.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.309
Xiaomi Redmi S2
IPS, 1440x720, 5.99
Huawei Y7 2018
IPS, 1440x720, 5.99
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.90
Nokia 6 2018
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
Super AMOLED, 1480x720, 5.60
Screen
13%
38%
-14%
18%
Brightness middle
501
393
-22%
761
52%
417
-17%
453
-10%
Brightness
483
365
-24%
723
50%
421
-13%
459
-5%
Brightness Distribution
90
85
-6%
90
0%
88
-2%
93
3%
Black Level *
0.65
0.29
55%
0.69
-6%
0.61
6%
Contrast
771
1355
76%
1103
43%
684
-11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.74
5.28
8%
2.4
58%
6.1
-6%
2.6
55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.53
9
-6%
5.2
39%
11.2
-31%
9.2
-8%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.3
4.2
21%
1.8
66%
7.1
-34%
1.6
70%
Gamma
2.309 95%
2.6 85%
2.21 100%
2.16 102%
2.07 106%
CCT
7895 82%
7086 92%
6312 103%
8362 78%
6356 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17735 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.6 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Nokia 6 2018
72580 Points +18%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
71635 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (59867 - 68348, n=17)
63396 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
61486 Points
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
46779 Points -24%
Huawei Y7 2018
45687 Points -26%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Nokia 6 2018
90435 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
90347 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (65759 - 81789, n=6)
76418 Points
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
61794 Points
Huawei Y7 2018
59421 Points
Xiaomi Redmi S2
Points
PCMark for Android
Work performance score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4596 - 7846, n=16)
5855 Points +8%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5712 Points +5%
Nokia 6 2018
5484 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
5444 Points
Huawei Y7 2018
4918 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
4878 Points -10%
Work 2.0 performance score
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)
11690 Points +143%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4626 - 5558, n=14)
4894 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
4875 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
4804 Points
Nokia 6 2018
4719 Points -2%
Huawei Y7 2018
3874 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
3809 Points -21%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=154, last 2 years)
5974 Points +395%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1535 Points +27%
Nokia 6 2018
1504 Points +25%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
1208 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1019 - 1362, n=17)
1206 Points 0%
Huawei Y7 2018
1020 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
985 Points -18%
System
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)
9891 Points +243%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3249 Points +13%
Nokia 6 2018
3237 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
2882 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1960 - 3261, n=17)
2819 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
2201 Points -24%
Huawei Y7 2018
1906 Points -34%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)
6481 Points +755%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1213 Points +60%
Nokia 6 2018
1161 Points +53%
Huawei Y7 2018
1144 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
1096 Points +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (584 - 1553, n=17)
1018 Points +34%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
758 Points
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)
15117 Points +1388%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1523 Points +50%
Nokia 6 2018
1520 Points +50%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
1016 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (968 - 1026, n=17)
1008 Points -1%
Huawei Y7 2018
739 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
533 Points -48%
Web
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)
1530 Points +60%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
958 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
925 Points -3%
Nokia 6 2018
895 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (649 - 958, n=17)
772 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
732 Points -24%
Huawei Y7 2018
673 Points -30%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=85, last 2 years)
5349 Points +532%
Nokia 6 2018
883 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (841 - 881, n=12)
866 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
846 Points
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
822 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
732 Points -13%
Huawei Y7 2018
676 Points -20%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=85, last 2 years)
14534 Points +233%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
4366 Points
Nokia 6 2018
4210 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3148 - 4396, n=12)
4171 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
4011 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
3741 Points -14%
Huawei Y7 2018
2889 Points -34%
Compute RenderScript Score
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=66, last 2 years)
11272 Points +228%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3763 Points +9%
Nokia 6 2018
3690 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
3440 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (2628 - 3678, n=10)
3281 Points -5%
Huawei Y7 2018
2133 Points -38%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Nokia 6 2018
17030 Points +99%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
16818 Points +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (8541 - 14003, n=16)
13468 Points +58%
Huawei Y7 2018
9583 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
8541 Points
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
5537 Points -35%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Nokia 6 2018
18572 Points +142%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
18449 Points +141%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (7668 - 13491, n=16)
12957 Points +69%
Huawei Y7 2018
9713 Points +27%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
7668 Points
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
5376 Points -30%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (14195 - 16267, n=16)
15727 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
14195 Points
Nokia 6 2018
13196 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
12845 Points -10%
Huawei Y7 2018
9153 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
6184 Points -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=36, last 2 years)
3794 Points +338%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1348 Points +55%
Nokia 6 2018
1332 Points +54%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
867 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (476 - 876, n=17)
826 Points -5%
Huawei Y7 2018
603 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
325 Points -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=36, last 2 years)
4234 Points +471%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1258 Points +70%
Nokia 6 2018
1249 Points +68%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
742 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (390 - 751, n=17)
710 Points -4%
Huawei Y7 2018
524 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
264 Points -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=36, last 2 years)
3086 Points +45%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
2122 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1631 - 2157, n=17)
1968 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1802 Points -15%
Nokia 6 2018
1733 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
1705 Points -20%
Huawei Y7 2018
1280 Points -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=93, last 2 years)
2717 Points +466%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
833 Points +74%
Nokia 6 2018
814 Points +70%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
480 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (452 - 484, n=17)
467 Points -3%
Huawei Y7 2018
310 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
262 Points -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=93, last 2 years)
2712 Points +590%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
721 Points +83%
Nokia 6 2018
707 Points +80%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
393 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (372 - 397, n=17)
384 Points -2%
Huawei Y7 2018
255 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
211 Points -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=93, last 2 years)
3140 Points +50%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
2099 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1636 - 2177, n=17)
1958 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1822 Points -13%
Nokia 6 2018
1738 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
1709 Points -19%
Huawei Y7 2018
1258 Points -40%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)
86.1 fps +146%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
35 fps
Nokia 6 2018
31 fps -11%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
28 fps -20%
Huawei Y7 2018
27 fps -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (17 - 35, n=17)
22.9 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
19 fps -46%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)
257 fps +1068%
Nokia 6 2018
30 fps +36%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
30 fps +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (22 - 23, n=17)
22.9 fps +4%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
22 fps
Huawei Y7 2018
16 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
12 fps -45%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=172, last 2 years)
74.2 fps +312%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
18 fps
Nokia 6 2018
15 fps -17%
Huawei Y7 2018
14 fps -22%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
13 fps -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (7.4 - 19, n=17)
10.6 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
10 fps -44%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=172, last 2 years)
146.9 fps +1414%
Nokia 6 2018
14 fps +44%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
14 fps +44%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
9.7 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 10, n=17)
9.43 fps -3%
Huawei Y7 2018
7.1 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
5.4 fps -44%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=172, last 2 years)
63 fps +350%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
14 fps
Nokia 6 2018
10 fps -29%
Huawei Y7 2018
10 fps -29%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
9.4 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
6.9 fps -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 14, n=17)
6.52 fps -53%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=172, last 2 years)
103.5 fps +1517%
Nokia 6 2018
9.8 fps +53%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
9.8 fps +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.5 - 14, n=17)
6.66 fps +4%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
6.4 fps
Huawei Y7 2018
4.6 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
3.2 fps -50%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=172, last 2 years)
44.9 fps +507%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
7.4 fps
Nokia 6 2018
5.9 fps -20%
Huawei Y7 2018
5.4 fps -27%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5.3 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
4 fps -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 7.4, n=16)
3.98 fps -46%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=171, last 2 years)
62.5 fps +1636%
Nokia 6 2018
5.6 fps +56%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5.6 fps +56%
Xiaomi Redmi S2
3.6 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.4 - 3.8, n=16)
3.52 fps -2%
Huawei Y7 2018
2.6 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
2 fps -44%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Redmi S2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
28.17 Points +9%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
27.97 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (21.3 - 31.8, n=17)
27.2 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi S2 (Chrome 67)
25.93 Points
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
20.88 Points -19%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
17.86 Points -31%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=206, last 2 years)
33824 Points +614%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
5011 Points +6%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
4993 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi S2 (Chrome 67)
4737 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3781 - 4979, n=17)
4524 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
3739 Points -21%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
3363 Points -29%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
13541 ms * -35%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
11808 ms * -18%
Xiaomi Redmi S2 (Chrome 67)
10021 ms *
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
9923 ms * +1%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
9797 ms * +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (8028 - 12194, n=17)
9289 ms * +7%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=161, last 2 years)
1517 ms * +85%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Nokia 6 2018
117 Points +19%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
108 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi S2 (Chrome 67)
98 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (60 - 113, n=12)
90.5 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
89 Points -9%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)
82 Points -16%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi S2Huawei Y7 2018Motorola Moto G6 PlusNokia 6 2018Samsung Galaxy A6 2018Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-25%
17%
-16%
-27%
-22%
518%
Sequential Read 256KB
261.4
256
-2%
286.6
10%
272.6
4%
208.4
-20%
Sequential Write 256KB
117.7
71.5
-39%
216.1
84%
118.3
1%
100.6
-15%
100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247)
-15%
Random Read 4KB
52.5
38.8
-26%
58.4
11%
38.78
-26%
24.54
-53%
Random Write 4KB
68.7
9.5
-86%
62.8
-9%
15.3
-78%
10.68
-84%
22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247)
-67%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85
4%
83.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
83.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
81.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178)
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
61.5
1%
62.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
61.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
65.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178)
-13%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InställningarVärde
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Dead Trigger 2
 InställningarVärde
 high30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Hög belastning
 40.1 °C37.5 °C39.4 °C 
 41.4 °C37.2 °C39.8 °C 
 40.5 °C37.6 °C38.3 °C 
Max: 41.4 °C
Medel: 39.1 °C
36.4 °C38.5 °C39.1 °C
36 °C38.6 °C40.2 °C
35.9 °C38.2 °C39.4 °C
Max: 40.2 °C
Medel: 38 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  41 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202728.32525.9273129.529.74031.429.55032.630.66324.121.88023.122.110024.122.112517.217.216016.618.420016.82825016.436.331514.145.140013.855.950013.659.963012.163.380011.565.1100011.567.4125011.266.5160011.266.9200011.269.2250011.268.9315011.168.3400011.267.6500011.264.1630011.457.4800011.458.11000011.362.61250011.452.71600011.438SPL57.159.566.757.96023.978.2N10.612.319.310.913.70.539.8median 11.4median 59.5median 43median 34.4median 36.8median 12.2median 59Delta3.614.523.723.523.111.719.235.236.932.938.737.236.931.737.939.63728.335.427.332.926.93226.738.82443.220.947.220.951.319.556.218.563.517.566.817.569.615.772.815.872.416.675.615.87215.471.915.574.21671.215.880.71679.916.372.816.372.716.271.416.465.516.463.228.6871.167.8median 16.4median 71.22.26.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi S2Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi S2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.4 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 2 / 2.6 / 3.5 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 4.6 / 6.7 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Redmi S2
3080 mAh
Huawei Y7 2018
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Nokia 6 2018
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
26%
41%
44%
48%
31%
20%
Idle Minimum *
2
0.9
55%
0.5
75%
0.67
66%
0.81
59%
0.981 ?(0.49 - 2.2, n=17)
51%
Idle Average *
2.6
1.9
27%
1.78
32%
1.76
32%
1.26
52%
1.985 ?(0.87 - 3.92, n=17)
24%
Idle Maximum *
3.5
2.3
34%
1.81
48%
1.78
49%
1.3
63%
Load Average *
4.6
4.7
-2%
3.3
28%
2.82
39%
2.87
38%
Load Maximum *
6.7
5.7
15%
5.14
23%
4.56
32%
4.82
28%
5.38 ?(3.8 - 7.2, n=17)
20%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
WiFi Websurfing
18tim 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15tim 10min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 29min
Xiaomi Redmi S2
3080 mAh
Huawei Y7 2018
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Nokia 6 2018
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
35%
92%
88%
62%
H.264
910
687
-25%
542
-40%
675
-26%
868
-5%
WiFi v1.3
1127
624
-45%
702
-38%
942
-16%
608
-46%
Load
89
245
175%
404
354%
362
307%
301
238%
Reader / Idle
1305
1846
1833
1616

För

+ microSD och två nanoSIM-kort samtidigt
+ 16 MP framåtriktad kamera
+ stabilt hölje
+ lång batteritid

Emot

- medioker huvudkamera
- appar kan inte lagras på microSD-kort
- ingen USB Typ C-anslutning
- medioker ljudkvalitet
Recenseras: Xiaomi Redmi S2. Recensionsex från notebooksbilliger.de.
Recenseras: Xiaomi Redmi S2. Recensionsex från notebooksbilliger.de.

I våra tester visar sig Redmi S2 vara en bra mittenskiktstelefon som stolt kan marschera genom leden av konkurrenter. För att attrahera selfie-fantaster har Xiaomi utrustat vår testenhet med en riktigt bra framåtriktad kamera; ett unikt säljargument jämfört med dess konkurrenter. Även huvudkameran lämpar sig för enstaka foton.

Prestandatesternas resultat kan intyga att telefonens goda systemprestanda borde vara tillräcklig för nästan varje tänkbart app-scenario. Den som letar efter ett kap eller gillar enheter med gedigen, grundläggande hårdvara kommer vara nöjd med Xiaomis senaste modell i Redmi-serien och kan med säkerhet tacka ja till detta erbjudande.

 Xiaomi Redmi S2 är en bra mittenskiktstelefon. Med sin högupplösta framåtriktade kamera är enheten inte bara lämplig för selfie-fantaster; tack vare god systemprestanda kan den även tilltala andra intresserade köpare.

Xiaomi Redmi S2 - 07/11/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker

Design
80%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
81%
Anslutningar
39 / 60 → 65%
Vikt
91%
Batteri
98%
Skärm
76%
Spelprestanda
28 / 63 → 44%
Programprestanda
51 / 70 → 72%
Temperatur
89%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Camera
71%
Medel
71%
81%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Redmi S2 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Mike Wobker, 2018-07-24 (Update: 2018-07-24)