Notebookcheck

Test: Xiaomi Redmi 7A Smartphone – Telefonen med ett reapris

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 08/16/2019

Förvånansvärt billig. Xiaomi Redmi 7A går att få tag på för 1.000 kronor. Redan dess föregångare hade mycket att erbjuda med tanke på sitt låga pris. Men vid en första anblick verkar Redmi 7A inte direkt erbjuda några större förändringar. Har den fortfarande ett bra förhållande mellan pris och prestanda?

Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Redmi Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Minne
2048 MB 
Skärm
5.45 tum 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixlar 295 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, , 9.6 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 256 GB, dedikerad plats, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, närhetssensor, kompass
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM, UMTS, LTE (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/38/40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.6 x 146.3 x 70.4
Batteri
4000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/2.2, 1.12µm, Fasdetekterande autofokus, LED-blixt, video @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Övrigt
Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, AC-adapter, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, 24 Månader Garanti, FM-radio, LED för notiser (en färg), SAR-värden: 0.557 W/kg (Huvud), 1.166 W/kg (Kropp), LTE Cat 4/5 (150 / 75 Mbps), fanless
Vikt
165 g, Strömförsörjning: 75 g
Pris
100 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Xiaomi Redmi 7A

Storleksjämförelse

153.6 mm 77.6 mm 9.7 mm 174 g152.4 mm 73 mm 7.8 mm 150 g147 mm 71 mm 9 mm 150 g146.3 mm 70.4 mm 9.6 mm 165 g147.5 mm 71.5 mm 8.3 mm 145 g147.1 mm 70.8 mm 8.5 mm 146 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=452)
230 MBit/s ∼100% +283%
Huawei Y5 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 16 GB eMMC Flash
63 (min: 56, max: 61) MBit/s ∼27% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Adreno 505, 439, 16 GB eMMC Flash
60 (min: 52, max: 64) MBit/s ∼26%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
59.6 (min: 56, max: 61) MBit/s ∼26% -1%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.5 (min: 49, max: 57) MBit/s ∼24% -7%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 (min: 29, max: 54) MBit/s ∼21% -19%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45 MBit/s ∼20% -25%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=452)
218 MBit/s ∼100% +305%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
56.6 (min: 29, max: 61) MBit/s ∼26% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 (min: 52, max: 59) MBit/s ∼26% +4%
Huawei Y5 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 16 GB eMMC Flash
55.5 (min: 52, max: 59) MBit/s ∼25% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Adreno 505, 439, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.8 (min: 25, max: 57) MBit/s ∼25%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
52.7 (min: 27, max: 58) MBit/s ∼24% -2%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.7 MBit/s ∼21% -13%
010203040506070Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø58.2 (52-64)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø53 (25-57)
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bro
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bro
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Fält
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Fält
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 7A – Översikt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 7A – Översikt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 7A – Bro
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 7A – Bro
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 7A – Fält
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 7A – Fält

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Foto av vår testkarta
Foto av vår testkarta
Testkartan i detalj
Color Checker-färger. Den nedre halvan av varje ruta visar referensfärgen.
482
cd/m²
505
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
531
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
534
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 534 cd/m² Medel: 506.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.5 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 533 cd/m²
Kontrast: 888:1 (Svärta: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 7.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
94.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.212
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Honor 7A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Nokia 2.1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Motorola Moto E5 Play
IPS, 960x480, 5.2
Huawei Y5 2019
IPS, 1520x720, 5.71
Screen
21%
25%
6%
-28%
6%
Brightness middle
533
404
-24%
417
-22%
338
-37%
369
-31%
630
18%
Brightness
506
400
-21%
395
-22%
327
-35%
358
-29%
593
17%
Brightness Distribution
88
82
-7%
88
0%
82
-7%
81
-8%
88
0%
Black Level *
0.6
0.26
57%
0.18
70%
0.27
55%
0.4
33%
0.66
-10%
Contrast
888
1554
75%
2317
161%
1252
41%
923
4%
955
8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.6
4.28
24%
6.46
-15%
5.36
4%
9.75
-74%
5.79
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.4
9.97
13%
10.72
6%
9.77
14%
18.28
-60%
9.54
16%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.4
3.5
53%
5.8
22%
6.2
16%
11.8
-59%
7
5%
Gamma
2.212 99%
2.213 99%
2.423 91%
2.345 94%
2.057 107%
2.176 101%
CCT
7974 82%
6899 94%
7839 83%
8460 77%
11971 54%
8420 77%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
78.6

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 384.6 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 384.6 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 384.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9259 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3068 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2471 Points ∼52% -19%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2820 Points ∼60% -8%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1602 Points ∼34% -48%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1635 Points ∼35% -47%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2436 Points ∼52% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3068 - 3267, n=3)
3192 Points ∼68% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=384)
4726 Points ∼100% +54%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
863 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
825 Points ∼58% -4%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
675 Points ∼47% -22%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
636 Points ∼45% -26%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
647 Points ∼45% -25%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
839 Points ∼59% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (863 - 903, n=3)
886 Points ∼62% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=384)
1426 Points ∼100% +65%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
4594 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
3892 Points ∼73% -15%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3146 Points ∼59% -32%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3209 Points ∼60% -30%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4195 Points ∼78% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (4594 - 4791, n=3)
4669 Points ∼87% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=390)
5345 Points ∼100% +16%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
5880 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6194 Points ∼100% +5%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
5109 Points ∼82% -13%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
4152 Points ∼67% -29%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
5616 Points ∼91% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (5880 - 6228, n=3)
6104 Points ∼99% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14946, n=558)
5797 Points ∼94% -1%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
2134 Points ∼80%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1868 Points ∼70% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (2134 - 2172, n=3)
2152 Points ∼80% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=70)
2675 Points ∼100% +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
408 Points ∼15%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
210 Points ∼8% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (401 - 412, n=3)
407 Points ∼15% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=70)
2744 Points ∼100% +573%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
497 Points ∼20%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
262 Points ∼10% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (490 - 502, n=3)
496 Points ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=70)
2497 Points ∼100% +402%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1595 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
763 Points ∼38% -52%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1301 Points ∼66% -18%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
940 Points ∼47% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1500 - 1657, n=3)
1584 Points ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4683, n=398)
1986 Points ∼100% +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
419 Points ∼23%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
260 Points ∼14% -38%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
304 Points ∼17% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
250 Points ∼14% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (413 - 419, n=3)
417 Points ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=398)
1798 Points ∼100% +329%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
501 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
305 Points ∼18% -39%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
366 Points ∼22% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
299 Points ∼18% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (492 - 502, n=3)
498 Points ∼30% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=399)
1668 Points ∼100% +233%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1594 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
807 Points ∼43% -49%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1285 Points ∼68% -19%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
885 Points ∼47% -44%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
877 Points ∼46% -45%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
924 Points ∼49% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1516 - 1594, n=3)
1567 Points ∼83% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=426)
1897 Points ∼100% +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
730 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
445 Points ∼19% -39%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
530 Points ∼22% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
250 Points ∼10% -66%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
249 Points ∼10% -66%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
451 Points ∼19% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (712 - 732, n=3)
725 Points ∼30% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=426)
2401 Points ∼100% +229%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
830 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
494 Points ∼25% -40%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
610 Points ∼30% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
297 Points ∼15% -64%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
296 Points ∼15% -64%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
509 Points ∼25% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (807 - 832, n=3)
823 Points ∼41% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=426)
2014 Points ∼100% +143%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1610 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
828 Points ∼44% -49%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1232 Points ∼65% -23%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
918 Points ∼48% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1575 - 1651, n=3)
1612 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4519, n=478)
1894 Points ∼100% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
370 Points ∼25%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
225 Points ∼15% -39%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
254 Points ∼17% -31%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
197 Points ∼13% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (366 - 370, n=3)
369 Points ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=478)
1488 Points ∼100% +302%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
446 Points ∼31%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
268 Points ∼19% -40%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
308 Points ∼22% -31%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
239 Points ∼17% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (441 - 447, n=3)
445 Points ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=479)
1432 Points ∼100% +221%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1579 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
840 Points ∼48% -47%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1259 Points ∼72% -20%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
892 Points ∼51% -44%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
819 Points ∼47% -48%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
911 Points ∼52% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1568 - 1596, n=3)
1581 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4540, n=518)
1758 Points ∼100% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
724 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
403 Points ∼21% -44%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
535 Points ∼27% -26%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
46 Points ∼2% -94%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
199 Points ∼10% -73%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
362 Points ∼19% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (704 - 724, n=3)
717 Points ∼37% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=517)
1951 Points ∼100% +169%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
823 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
456 Points ∼27% -45%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
613 Points ∼36% -26%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
58 Points ∼3% -93%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
239 Points ∼14% -71%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
418 Points ∼25% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (802 - 824, n=3)
816 Points ∼48% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8165, n=520)
1683 Points ∼100% +104%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
12673 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
14128 Points ∼94% +11%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9249 Points ∼62% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10427 Points ∼69% -18%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10784 Points ∼72% -15%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
15004 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (12096 - 12673, n=3)
12386 Points ∼83% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=678)
14251 Points ∼95% +12%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
13510 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6785 Points ∼30% -50%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9684 Points ∼43% -28%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5487 Points ∼25% -59%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5712 Points ∼26% -58%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7514 Points ∼34% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (13440 - 13615, n=3)
13522 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=676)
22294 Points ∼100% +65%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
13315 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7671 Points ∼43% -42%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9584 Points ∼53% -28%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6133 Points ∼34% -54%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6379 Points ∼35% -52%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
8452 Points ∼47% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (13192 - 13315, n=3)
13251 Points ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=676)
17997 Points ∼100% +35%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
23 fps ∼60%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
13 fps ∼34% -43%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
16 fps ∼42% -30%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼20% -67%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼20% -67%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
14 fps ∼37% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (23 - 23, n=3)
23 fps ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=696)
38.2 fps ∼100% +66%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
35 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
19 fps ∼54% -46%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
27 fps ∼77% -23%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
14 fps ∼40% -60%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
20 fps ∼57% -43%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
21 fps ∼60% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (34 - 35, n=3)
34.3 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=705)
28.2 fps ∼81% -19%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
19 fps ∼86%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.3 fps ∼29% -67%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
7.1 fps ∼32% -63%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
2.7 fps ∼12% -86%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
2.7 fps ∼12% -86%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
6.5 fps ∼30% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (9.8 - 19, n=3)
12.9 fps ∼59% -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=602)
22 fps ∼100% +16%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
9.9 fps ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
12 fps ∼62% +21%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
14 fps ∼72% +41%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6.1 fps ∼31% -38%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
11 fps ∼56% +11%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
12 fps ∼62% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (9.9 - 18, n=3)
15.3 fps ∼78% +55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=611)
19.5 fps ∼100% +97%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
6.4 fps ∼36%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4 fps ∼22% -37%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
4.6 fps ∼26% -28%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.3 fps ∼24% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (6.4 - 6.4, n=3)
6.4 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=468)
17.9 fps ∼100% +180%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
14 fps ∼83%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7.5 fps ∼45% -46%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
10 fps ∼60% -29%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7.8 fps ∼46% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (13 - 14, n=3)
13.3 fps ∼79% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=470)
16.8 fps ∼100% +20%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
4.1 fps ∼41%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.7 fps ∼27% -34%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.8 fps ∼28% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.9 - 4.1, n=3)
3.97 fps ∼39% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=191)
10.1 fps ∼100% +146%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1.2 fps ∼17%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
0.85 fps ∼12% -29%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
0.8 fps ∼11% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1.2 - 1.2, n=3)
1.2 fps ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=190)
7.01 fps ∼100% +484%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.3 fps ∼29%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.3 fps ∼29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (6.4 - 6.6, n=2)
6.5 fps ∼44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=195)
14.8 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.7 fps ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.3 (min: 4.3) fps ∼14% -38%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.3 fps ∼14% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.6 - 3.7, n=3)
3.67 fps ∼22% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=195)
16.5 fps ∼100% +346%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
3.5 fps ∼29%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.9 fps ∼16% -46%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.6 fps ∼21% -26%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2 fps ∼16% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.5 - 3.6, n=3)
3.53 fps ∼29% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=393)
12.2 fps ∼100% +249%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
7.3 fps ∼67%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.2 fps ∼29% -56%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
5.4 fps ∼50% -26%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
3.2 fps ∼29% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (7 - 7.3, n=3)
7.1 fps ∼65% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=397)
10.9 fps ∼100% +49%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
75175 Points ∼53%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
61753 Points ∼43% -18%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
59990 Points ∼42% -20%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
63421 Points ∼44% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (75175 - 79792, n=3)
77540 Points ∼54% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=295)
143117 Points ∼100% +90%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1083 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
733 Points ∼68% -32%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
705 Points ∼65% -35%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
649 Points ∼60% -40%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
720 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
775 Points ∼72% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (834 - 1083, n=3)
918 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=637)
761 Points ∼70% -30%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1007 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
482 Points ∼23% -52%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
739 Points ∼36% -27%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
428 Points ∼21% -57%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
418 Points ∼20% -58%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
471 Points ∼23% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1000 - 1009, n=3)
1005 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=637)
2081 Points ∼100% +107%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
655 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
607 Points ∼40% -7%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1209 Points ∼79% +85%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
502 Points ∼33% -23%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
490 Points ∼32% -25%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1421 Points ∼93% +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (655 - 1335, n=3)
1102 Points ∼72% +68%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=637)
1536 Points ∼100% +135%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
2238 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1434 Points ∼48% -36%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1962 Points ∼65% -12%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1228 Points ∼41% -45%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1241 Points ∼41% -45%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1798 Points ∼60% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (2238 - 2687, n=3)
2516 Points ∼84% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=637)
3007 Points ∼100% +34%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 2048
1124 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
745 Points ∼49% -34%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1055 Points ∼70% -6%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
643 Points ∼43% -43%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
654 Points ∼43% -42%
Huawei Y5 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
983 Points ∼65% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1124 - 1312, n=3)
1249 Points ∼83% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=637)
1507 Points ∼100% +34%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=108)
35.9 Points ∼100% +112%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)
16.911 Points ∼47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (15.9 - 16.9, n=2)
16.4 Points ∼46% -3%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)
15.682 Points ∼44% -7%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=96)
40.1 runs/min ∼100% +117%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chome 76)
18.45 runs/min ∼46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (18.2 - 18.5, n=2)
18.3 runs/min ∼46% -1%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chome 74)
14.7 runs/min ∼37% -20%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=166)
67.1 Points ∼100% +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (34 - 38, n=3)
36.3 Points ∼54% +7%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)
35 Points ∼52% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)
34 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
30 Points ∼45% -12%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=694)
6825 Points ∼100% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (4701 - 4958, n=3)
4823 Points ∼71% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)
4701 Points ∼69%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)
4603 Points ∼67% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
4332 Points ∼63% -8%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
3389 Points ∼50% -28%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
2503 Points ∼37% -47%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
2412 Points ∼35% -49%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
14709 ms * ∼100% -45%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
13821 ms * ∼94% -36%
Motorola Moto E5 Play
13477 ms * ∼92% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
10739.7 ms * ∼73% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=719)
10511 ms * ∼71% -4%
Huawei Y5 2019 (Chrome 74)
10364 ms * ∼70% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 7A (Chrome 76)
10142.7 ms * ∼69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (9768 - 10143, n=3)
9914 ms * ∼67% +2%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi 7AXiaomi Redmi 6AHonor 7A Nokia 2.1Motorola Moto E5 PlayHuawei Y5 2019Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
84%
-5%
0%
43%
1%
-38%
20%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
65.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
61.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
28.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-55%
63.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
39.4 (6.38 - 65.7, n=129)
-39%
49.3 (1.7 - 87.1, n=430)
-24%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
85.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
79.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
83.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
81.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
58.7 (8.1 - 87.7, n=129)
-31%
67.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=430)
-21%
Random Write 4KB
9.6
52.23
444%
9.4
-2%
13.45
40%
43.16
350%
13.1
36%
7.89 (0.49 - 44.9, n=247)
-18%
22.5 (0.14 - 250, n=754)
134%
Random Read 4KB
57.8
33.94
-41%
39.2
-32%
50.46
-13%
46.31
-20%
62.1
7%
21.3 (2.49 - 62.1, n=247)
-63%
47.9 (1.59 - 196, n=754)
-17%
Sequential Write 256KB
68.7
131.67
92%
72.5
6%
51.18
-26%
52.2
-24%
45.2
-34%
42.5 (8.74 - 106, n=247)
-38%
98.2 (2.99 - 590, n=754)
43%
Sequential Read 256KB
258
277.54
8%
254.8
-1%
288.26
12%
279
8%
272.1
5%
165 (9.66 - 294, n=247)
-36%
276 (12.1 - 1504, n=754)
7%
010203040Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.30.2.4: Ø29.9 (26-31)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.30.2.4: Ø29.9 (28-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.6.3a: Ø23.6 (15-30)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.6.3a: Ø25.7 (3-30)
Hög belastning
 40.5 °C38.3 °C37.5 °C 
 40.5 °C38.5 °C38.2 °C 
 40 °C38.9 °C38.2 °C 
Max: 40.5 °C
Medel: 39 °C
36.5 °C38.7 °C39.9 °C
36 °C38.5 °C39.9 °C
36.3 °C39.2 °C39.5 °C
Max: 39.9 °C
Medel: 38.3 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  35.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.938.22538.336.43131.8304034.135.1504439.76331.729.880252610026.729.512523.922.916021.832.620020.343.525019.65031518.855.340017.560.750020.16663019.771.280017.372.5100017.473.8125015.471.4160016.471.8200016.472.1250015.568.5315015.665.4400015.765500016.169.963001669.3800016.568.61000016.368.41250015.968.61600015.859SPL702969.782N25.31.223.752.9median 16.5median 68.4Delta28.936.945.536.544.937.239.137.641.231.73523.823.724.425.123.625.119.922.723.32418.430.718.238.215.845.114.653.415.557.21361.512.364.712.166.111.965.810.768.210.768.110.566.610.366.810.767.210.565.510.56510.663.210.662.510.553.710.641.461.552.561.424.177.814.68.214.50.639.8median 11.9median 62.53.412.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi 7AXiaomi Redmi 6A
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 7A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Redmi 6A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.5 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.6 / 2.2 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.9 / 5.4 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto E5 Play
2120 mAh
Huawei Y5 2019
3020 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
17%
-22%
16%
-3%
-10%
7%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.7
12%
1.3
-63%
0.7
12%
1.2
-50%
1.2
-50%
0.723 (0.63 - 0.8, n=3)
10%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=785)
-10%
Idle Average *
1.6
1.2
25%
1.6
-0%
1.2
25%
1.6
-0%
1.9
-19%
1.72 (1.6 - 1.9, n=3)
-8%
1.739 (0.6 - 6.2, n=784)
-9%
Idle Maximum *
2.2
2
9%
2.9
-32%
1.9
14%
2
9%
2.4
-9%
2.05 (1.73 - 2.21, n=3)
7%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=785)
8%
Load Average *
3.9
3.4
13%
3.7
5%
3.2
18%
3.6
8%
3.3
15%
3.37 (3.04 - 3.9, n=3)
14%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=779)
-4%
Load Maximum *
5.4
4
26%
6.4
-19%
4.8
11%
4.5
17%
4.6
15%
4.77 (4.15 - 5.4, n=3)
12%
5.93 (1.2 - 14.2, n=779)
-10%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
25tim 43min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14tim 13min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15tim 02min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 46min
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto E5 Play
2120 mAh
Huawei Y5 2019
3020 mAh
Battery Runtime
-11%
-23%
-5%
-55%
-17%
Reader / Idle
1543
1256
-19%
H.264
902
732
-19%
WiFi v1.3
853
761
-11%
657
-23%
809
-5%
382.9
-55%
709
-17%
Load
286
249
-13%

För

+ fantastiskt pris i förhållande till prestandan
+ lång batteritid
+ höljet har en ergonomisk design
+ ljusstark skärm
+ bra högtalare
+ uppdaterad mjukvara

Emot

- aningen oprecis GPS
- dämpad röstkvalitet
- ingen fingeravtrycksläsare
- skärmen har dåligt kontrastförhållande

Omdöme – Så billig men ändå så kraftfull

Recension av Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Recension av Xiaomi Redmi 7A

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Xiaomis Redmi-telefoner är prissänkare - de fortsätter att flytta fram gränserna för sitt prisskikt: Redmi 7A kostar runt 1.000 kronor (beroende på konfiguration) och har funktioner som vi vanligtvis bara ser på telefoner som kostar dubbelt så mycket. Som exempel använder telefonen en Snapdragon 439, en kraftfull SoC som ger hög prestanda för pengarna. Riktigt lång batteritid, utmärkta högtalare och möjlighet till att spela spel rundar av uppsättningen av utmärkta funktioner. Kameran tar skapliga bilder, skärmen är ljusstark och värmeutvecklingen vid belastning går att tolerera. De nya färgalternativen ger Xiaomis telefon en fräsch och modern look och den är dessutom bekväm att hålla i. Tack vare en snabbladdningsfunktion laddas telefonen dessutom kvickt.

Det är en ganska stor samling styrkor för en såpass billig enhet och det finns knappt någon konkurrent i det här prisskiktet som kan matcha det. Telefonen slår till och med sin föregångare med längre batteritid och ökad prestanda. Det är synd att Redmi A-modellerna inte kommer med en fingeravtrycksläsare. Den har dessutom en oprecis GPS och röstkvaliteten låter en aning dämpad.

Om du letar efter en billig smartphone men ändå vill ha bra prestanda och lång batteritid kan Redmi 7A vara telefonen för dig.

Vi kan definitivt rekommendera Xiaomi Redmi 7A. Kolla bara så du köper en global version från en pålitlig återförsäljare, annars kan du få problem med AC-adaptern och garantin.

Xiaomi Redmi 7A - 08/08/2019 v6(old)
Florian Schmitt

Design
74%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
93%
Anslutningar
39 / 60 → 65%
Vikt
91%
Batteri
96%
Skärm
83%
Spelprestanda
32 / 63 → 50%
Programprestanda
50 / 70 → 71%
Temperatur
87%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
66 / 91 → 72%
Camera
63%
Medel
72%
83%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Redmi 7A Smartphone – Telefonen med ett reapris
Florian Schmitt, 2019-08-16 (Update: 2019-08-16)