Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Framework Laptop 13.5 - Om Microsoft skulle tillverka en reparerbar Surface Laptop skulle den se ut så här (Sammanfattning)
Framework Laptop 13.5 (Laptop Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-1165G7 4 x 2.8 - 4.7 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 28 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-UP3
Grafikkort
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Kärna: 1300 MHz, Minne: 2000 MHz, DDR4, 30.0.100.9684
Minne
16 GB
, Crucial DDR4-3200, 22-22-22-52, Enkel kanal
Skärm
13.50 tum 3:2, 2256 x 1504 pixlar 201 PPI, BOE CQ NE135FBM-N41, IPS, BOE095F, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Moderkort
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Hårddisk
Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 WDS100T1X0E, 1024 GB
Vikt
1.3 kg, Strömförsörjning: 328 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85.4 % | 08/2021 | Framework Laptop 13.5 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.85 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
| 89.5 % | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.50" | 3000x2000 | ||
| 84.7 % | 05/2021 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.5 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
| 87.3 % | 05/2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 11.5 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
| 85.7 % | HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U R7 5800U, Vega 8 | 1.5 kg | 18 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 84.7 % | 09/2022 | Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.3 kg | 18.2 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 (AV Pro UHS-II V60) | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U (AV Pro UHS-II V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 (AV Pro UHS-II V60) | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U (AV Pro UHS-II V60) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
Framework Laptop 13.5; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø914 (734-1050)
Framework Laptop 13.5; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø956 (902-1037)
8.7 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
7 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE CQ NE135FBM-N41 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 453 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 435.1 cd/m² Minimum: 10 cd/m²Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 449 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1151:1 (Svärta: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.34 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.96
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
70.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
| Framework Laptop 13.5 BOE CQ NE135FBM-N41, IPS, 13.50, 2256x1504 | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng Samsung SDC4148, OLED, 13.50, 3000x2000 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 LQ135P1JX51, IPS, 13.50, 2256x1504 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE LPM135M467, IPS, 13.50, 2256x1504 | HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U AUO4B2D, IPS, 13.30, 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AU Optronics B133HAN05.F, IPS, 13.30, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 28% | -4% | -41% | 1% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 69 | 99.9 45% | 64.7 -6% | 40.1 -42% | 69.7 1% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.3 | 100 1% | 97.2 -2% | 59.9 -40% | 99.2 0% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.3 | 96.1 37% | 66.9 -5% | 41.4 -41% | 71.4 2% | |
| Response Times | 95% | -12% | 19% | 17% | 18% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 55.6 ? | 2 ? 96% | 62.8 ? -13% | 53.6 ? 4% | 42.8 ? 23% | 46.8 ? 16% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 36 ? | 2 ? 94% | 39.8 ? -11% | 24 ? 33% | 32 ? 11% | 28.8 ? 20% |
| PWM Frequency | 250 ? | 21930 ? | ||||
| Screen | 346% | 10% | 27% | -62% | -12% | |
| Brightness middle | 449 | 370 -18% | 413 -8% | 466 4% | 304 -32% | 291.5 -35% |
| Brightness | 435 | 374 -14% | 400 -8% | 454 4% | 292 -33% | 294 -32% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 90 -3% | 94 1% | 94 1% | 89 -4% | 93 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.01 97% | 0.29 26% | 0.23 41% | 0.23 41% | 0.19 51% |
| Contrast | 1151 | 37000 3115% | 1424 24% | 2026 76% | 1322 15% | 1534 33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.34 | 2.57 -10% | 2.8 -20% | 2.1 10% | 5 -114% | 3.83 -64% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.07 | 4.52 36% | 7.2 -2% | 4.5 36% | 17.7 -150% | 8.43 -19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.96 | 2.31 -141% | 0.8 17% | 4.2 -338% | 1.07 -11% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 2.2 53% | 1.9 60% | 2.7 43% | 2.1 55% | 6.2 -32% |
| Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.36 93% | 2.12 104% | 2.08 106% | 2.03 108% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 6760 96% | 6154 106% | 6510 100% | 6210 105% | 6443 101% | 6469 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 85.8 | 61.6 | 61.1 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 97.2 | 94.9 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 156% /
242% | -2% /
4% | 23% /
25% | -29% /
-46% | 2% /
-5% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 55.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Framework Laptop 13.5 Intel Core i7-1165G7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø845 (812.27-850.43)
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø827 (741.02-973.71)
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng Intel Core i7-1165G7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø687 (682.5-699.4)
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø611 (464.15-634.96)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (2525 - 6862, n=64) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1110 - 1539, n=59) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1302 - 1595, n=77) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-54N-79EY | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3078 - 5926, n=77) | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-54N-79EY | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1.39 - 8.47, n=80) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
| Acer Spin 5 SP513-54N-79EY | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21.5 - 88.1, n=78) | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (0.552 - 1.002, n=80) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| VAIO Z VJZ141C11L | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4531 - 5454, n=50) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8997 - 11505, n=50) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5570 - 7136, n=50) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4083 - 5550, n=50) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4768 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U | |
* ... smaller is better
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 WDS100T1X0E | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H) | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G | HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU | Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -76% | -81% | -69% | -76% | -101% | |
| Seq Read | 5613 | 1343 -76% | 1821 -68% | 1898 -66% | 1936 -66% | 1860 -67% |
| Seq Write | 4909 | 1222 -75% | 794 -84% | 1065 -78% | 1237 -75% | 500 -90% |
| 4K Read | 80.6 | 63.6 -21% | 47.54 -41% | 58 -28% | 40.35 -50% | 36.26 -55% |
| 4K Write | 256.6 | 107.8 -58% | 141.6 -45% | 200.7 -22% | 99.5 -61% | 118.6 -54% |
| 4K-64 Read | 2222 | 417.5 -81% | 782 -65% | 580 -74% | 645 -71% | 419 -81% |
| 4K-64 Write | 2050 | 496 -76% | 766 -63% | 779 -62% | 365.8 -82% | 219 -89% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.032 | 0.103 -222% | 0.191 -497% | 0.052 -63% | 0.104 -225% | 0.102 -219% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.044 | 0.043 2% | 0.027 39% | 0.16 -264% | 0.038 14% | 0.17 -286% |
| Score Read | 2864 | 615 -79% | 1012 -65% | 828 -71% | 879 -69% | 641 -78% |
| Score Write | 2797 | 726 -74% | 987 -65% | 1087 -61% | 589 -79% | 388 -86% |
| Score Total | 7098 | 1675 -76% | 2477 -65% | 2316 -67% | 1892 -73% | 1300 -82% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1926 | 334.9 -83% | 1243 -35% | 1659 -14% | 708 -63% | 880 -54% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 947 | 276.3 -71% | 628 -34% | 519 -45% | 132.1 -86% | 185.3 -80% |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1880 | 433.2 -77% | 976 -48% | 872 -54% | 326.7 -83% | 212.7 -89% |
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -42% | -67% | -49% | -67% | -68% | |
| Write 4K | 299.4 | 128.9 -57% | 118.2 -61% | 226.6 -24% | 86.7 -71% | 89.2 -70% |
| Read 4K | 87.6 | 140 60% | 37.54 -57% | 62.8 -28% | 32.45 -63% | 33.09 -62% |
| Write Seq | 5205 | 1422 -73% | 1017 -80% | 1296 -75% | 1235 -76% | 988 -81% |
| Read Seq | 4276 | 1660 -61% | 926 -78% | 1445 -66% | 1417 -67% | 1322 -69% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 846 | 475.1 -44% | 354.2 -58% | 545 -36% | 390.8 -54% | 332.6 -61% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 905 | 581 -36% | 352.6 -61% | 687 -24% | 291 -68% | 389.3 -57% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 5189 | 1793 -65% | 1174 -77% | 1483 -71% | 1384 -73% | 984 -81% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 6921 | 2536 -63% | 2261 -67% | 2334 -66% | 2350 -66% | 2461 -64% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -59% /
-64% | -74% /
-76% | -59% /
-62% | -72% /
-73% | -85% /
-89% |
* ... smaller is better
Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 WDS100T1X0E
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6921 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5189 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
905 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
846 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
4276 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
5205 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
87.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
299.4 MB/s
DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 5893 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 15999 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2361 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1361 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
| 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (14.9 - 56.5, n=175) | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.5 - 28, n=171) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8.15 - 27.8, n=164) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 | |
| Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U | |
| Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Witcher 3 FPS-tabell
Framework Laptop 13.5: Ø71 (62-75)
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 75.9 | 45.1 | 22.1 | 12 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 109 | 66.1 | 41.2 | 38.2 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 29.4 | 15.7 | 12.1 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 41.3 | 36.5 | 29.5 |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 WDS100T1X0E | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H) | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G | Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US Vega 7, R5 5500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G | Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | 5% | 8% | 4% | -13% | |
| off / environment * | 23.9 | 26 -9% | 24.2 -1% | 25.1 -5% | 25.1 -5% | 30.7 -28% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23.9 | 26 -9% | 24.2 -1% | 25.1 -5% | 25.1 -5% | 30.7 -28% |
| Idle Average * | 23.9 | 26 -9% | 24.2 -1% | 25.1 -5% | 25.1 -5% | 30.7 -28% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.9 | 26 -9% | 24.2 -1% | 27.1 -13% | 25.1 -5% | 30.7 -28% |
| Load Average * | 45.6 | 37.5 18% | 39.5 13% | 32.7 28% | 41 10% | 38.8 15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.1 | 32.7 31% | 38.6 18% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 47.9 | 36.3 24% | 39.5 18% | 35.8 25% | 38.7 19% | 39.3 18% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 23.9 / 23.9 / 23.9 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 45.6 / 47.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 23.9 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-0.5 °C / -0.9 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-0.5 °C / -0.9 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Framework Laptop 13.5 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Strömförbrukning
| Av/Standby | 0.52 / 4 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 4.3 / 8.2 / 8.7 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
43.5 / 61.8 Watt |
   
| |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 WDS100T1X0E, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.50 | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H), OLED, 3000x2000, 13.50 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.50 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.50 | HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U R7 5800U, Vega 8, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US R5 5500U, Vega 7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -14% | 15% | 14% | 24% | 14% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.3 | 6.3 -47% | 2.6 40% | 3.9 9% | 3.2 26% | 5 -16% |
| Idle Average * | 8.2 | 11.2 -37% | 6 27% | 7.3 11% | 5.5 33% | 6.3 23% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.7 | 13.3 -53% | 8.2 6% | 10.3 -18% | 6.4 26% | 6.9 21% |
| Load Average * | 43.5 | 32 26% | 41.4 5% | 30.6 30% | 35.5 18% | 41.5 5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.5 | 25.5 41% | 36.4 16% | 33.2 24% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 61.8 | 35.6 42% | 64.1 -4% | 57.1 8% | 47.5 23% | 46.5 25% |
* ... smaller is better
Energiförbrukning: Witcher 3 / Stress-test
Framework Laptop 13.5; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø43.5 (41.7-50.5)
Framework Laptop 13.5; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø51.2 (47.9-61.9)
| Framework Laptop 13.5 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 Wh | HP Spectre x360 14-ea0378ng i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 66 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 13 i7 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 47.4 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga G1 20QA001RGE i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 44.5 Wh | HP ProBook x360 435 G8 R7-5800U R7 5800U, Vega 8, 45 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US R5 5500U, Vega 7, 60 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -3% | -5% | 6% | 19% | 65% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 478 | 466 -3% | 454 -5% | 506 6% | 567 19% | 791 65% |
| Reader / Idle | 803 | 1050 | ||||
| Load | 157 | 81 | 112 | 68 | 121 |
För
+ 4x USB-C 4.0 portar kompatibla med Power Delivery, DisplayPort och Thunderbolt
+ 3:2-skärm av hög kvalitet som täcker hela sRGB
+ Lätt att serva och portar som kan bytas ut
+ Bekvämt tangentbord och bekväm klickplatta
+ 1080p 60 FPS webbkamera
Emot
- Locket är svagt, böjbart och riskerar att gunga; ingen glasförstärkning
- Långsamma svart-vita och grå-grå responstider
- Ingen tryckkänslig skärm trots blank yta
- Har ej stöd för Windows Hello
- Gångjärnen kunde varit fastare
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Det händer ofta att datortillverkarna tar fram tunna och tjusiga laptops som är irriterande svåra, för att inte säga omöjliga, att reparera. Till och med enkla uppgraderingar av RAM eller lagring är något man oftast avråder från. Framework Laptop är ett bevis på att tunna och lätta modeller inte nödvändigtvis behöver offra möjligheten att utföra service eller vara utan unika funktioner som utbytbara portar med anledning av storlek och mobilitet.
Framework Laptop slår Surface Laptop på den sistnämndas hemmaplan. Den lyckas vara mindre, betydligt lättare att serva och har fler inbyggda portar utan att för den sakens skull offra prestanda och mobilitet.
Det finns saker med Framework Laptop som kunde varit bättre. I synnerhet är locket och gångjärnen svagare än på konkurrenter som Dell XPS 13, HP Spectre x360 14, Microsoft Surface Laptop eller Lenovo ThinkBook. Vidare låter fläkten mer vid högre belastning. Inget av detta är avgörande, men fastare gångjärn, en större och tystare kyllösning samt förstärkt glas från kant till kant till skärmen hade gjort Framework ännu bättre.
Framework Laptop 13.5
-
07/26/2021 v7
Allen Ngo
Office - Vägt medel
Pricecompare
