Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: 2021 HP Envy 14 - Tiger Lake, 16:10 och GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q i samma enhet (Sammanfattning)
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr (Envy 14 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i5-1135G7 4 x 2.4 - 4.2 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-UP3
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 4 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1035 MHz, Minne: 1250 MHz, 21.5 W TDP, GDDR6, 461.40, Optimus
Minne
16 GB
, DDR4-3200, Fastlött, Dubbla kanaler
Skärm
14.00 tum 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixlar 162 PPI, Kapacitiv, 10 punkter, AU Optronics AUOF392, IPS, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Moderkort
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Hårddisk
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ, 256 GB
Vikt
1.63 kg, Strömförsörjning: 420 g
Pris
1250 USD
Länkar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.5 % | 02/2021 | HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 84.2 % | 04/2021 | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.6 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2160 | |
| 85.1 % | 02/2021 | Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 89.4 % | 12/2020 | HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 17.2 mm | 13.50" | 1920x1280 | |
| 74.5 % | 06/2020 | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF i7-1065G7, GeForce MX230 | 1.8 kg | 21 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.3 % | 12/2020 | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel i7-10510U, GeForce MX350 | 1.5 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2160x1440 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB) | |
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1336 (1246-1419)
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1175 (526-1384)
18.8 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
25 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics AUOF392 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 453 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 391.7 cd/m² Minimum: 28.2 cd/m²Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 81 %
Mitt på batteriet: 412 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1288:1 (Svärta: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.88 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.96
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
76.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
77.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr AU Optronics AUOF392, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1200 | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5 B140ZAN01.7, IPS, 14.00, 3840x2160 | Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA AU Optronics B140HAN06.8, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 LG Philips LGD0663, IPS, 13.50, 1920x1280 | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF Chi Mei 140HCA, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel TV140WTM-NH0, IPS LED, 14.00, 2160x1440 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 6% | -6% | -9% | -43% | -8% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 77.1 | 87.4 13% | 69 -11% | 65.8 -15% | 41.84 -46% | 67.1 -13% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 99.9 0% | 99.1 -1% | 98.2 -2% | 62.3 -38% | 99.1 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 76.7 | 81.1 6% | 71 -7% | 67.9 -11% | 43.33 -44% | 69 -10% |
| Response Times | 20% | 4% | 7% | 33% | 45% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 61.2 ? | 48.4 ? 21% | 56.4 ? 8% | 62 ? -1% | 41 ? 33% | 37.6 ? 39% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 46 ? | 37.2 ? 19% | 46 ? -0% | 39.6 ? 14% | 31 ? 33% | 22.4 ? 51% |
| PWM Frequency | 2500 ? | 59520 ? | ||||
| Screen | -32% | 8% | -3% | -98% | -20% | |
| Brightness middle | 412 | 475.8 15% | 361.8 -12% | 443.5 8% | 226 -45% | 458 11% |
| Brightness | 392 | 463 18% | 351 -10% | 394 1% | 214 -45% | 448 14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 81 | 89 10% | 90 11% | 78 -4% | 92 14% | 89 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.44 -38% | 0.28 12% | 0.17 47% | 0.17 47% | 0.25 22% |
| Contrast | 1288 | 1081 -16% | 1292 0% | 2609 103% | 1329 3% | 1832 42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.88 | 3.81 -103% | 1.44 23% | 2.7 -44% | 5.21 -177% | 3.4 -81% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.06 | 6.96 -127% | 3.3 -8% | 4.36 -42% | 22.15 -624% | 6.7 -119% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.96 | 2.55 -30% | 1.24 37% | 2.61 -33% | 4.43 -126% | 1.7 13% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 4.1 -86% | 1.3 41% | 3.4 -55% | 3.27 -49% | 4.9 -123% |
| Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.14 103% | 2.15 102% | 2.09 105% | 2.36 93% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 6650 98% | 6564 99% | 6411 101% | 6144 106% | 6538 99% | 7704 84% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 68.7 | 72.4 5% | 64.9 -6% | 62.1 -10% | 40 -42% | 63.5 -8% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.8 | 99.9 0% | 99.3 -1% | 98.5 -1% | 62 -38% | 99.1 -1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-18% | 2% /
5% | -2% /
-3% | -36% /
-72% | 6% /
-10% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 61.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 31.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17942 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø919 (891.54-924.6)
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Intel Core i5-1035G7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø609 (588.11-736)
SCHENKER XMG Core 14 Intel Core i5-1135G7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø435 (429.22-506.39)
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA Intel Core i7-1065G7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø587 (557.06-601.57)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5 Intel Core i7-1165G7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø699 (656.49-769.7)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (979 - 2382, n=62) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (375 - 527, n=62) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
| Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
| HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (431 - 941, n=65) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
| Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (141.4 - 205, n=61) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
| Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
| Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (1147 - 1428, n=58) | |
| Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
| HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
| HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3475 - 5472, n=58) | |
| Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (44.2 - 62.9, n=60) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
| HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Honor MagicBook 14, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (0.619 - 0.727, n=59) | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
| HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
| MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 | |
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3909 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5402 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5410 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr | |
| HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5 WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel Lite-On CA5-8D512 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 1% | -1% | -43% | 4% | |
| Seq Read | 2127 | 2068 -3% | 2088 -2% | 2074 -2% | 2933 38% |
| Seq Write | 1427 | 1414 -1% | 1311 -8% | 775 -46% | 810 -43% |
| 4K Read | 52.5 | 46.99 -10% | 58.2 11% | 37.81 -28% | 56.6 8% |
| 4K Write | 122.9 | 211.9 72% | 128.4 4% | 101.3 -18% | 147.6 20% |
| 4K-64 Read | 947 | 1027 8% | 1039 10% | 1265 34% | 856 -10% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1598 | 978 -39% | 1238 -23% | 383.5 -76% | 1099 -31% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.072 | 0.057 21% | 0.045 37% | 0.081 -13% | 0.046 36% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.09 | 0.066 27% | 0.088 2% | 0.263 -192% | 0.028 69% |
| Score Read | 1212 | 1281 6% | 1306 8% | 1510 25% | 1206 0% |
| Score Write | 1864 | 1331 -29% | 1497 -20% | 562 -70% | 1328 -29% |
| Score Total | 3674 | 3243 -12% | 3446 -6% | 2781 -24% | 3059 -17% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1605 | 1891 18% | 2248 40% | 716 -55% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 847 | 604 -29% | 559 -34% | 335.4 -60% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1632 | 1422 -13% | 1087 -33% | 484.8 -70% | |
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 3% | -3% | -3% | 23% | |
| Write 4K | 119.7 | 131.5 10% | 72.1 -40% | 159.6 33% | 161.8 35% |
| Read 4K | 45.28 | 36.83 -19% | 41.1 -9% | 53.5 18% | 60.6 34% |
| Write Seq | 1951 | 1614 -17% | 1949 0% | 1174 -40% | 2209 13% |
| Read Seq | 2252 | 2030 -10% | 1989 -12% | 1648 -27% | 2473 10% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 438.1 | 516 18% | 413.8 -6% | 420.8 -4% | 514 17% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 312.8 | 419.7 34% | 384.2 23% | 564 80% | 586 87% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2348 | 2705 15% | 2816 20% | 1231 -48% | 2205 -6% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3529 | 3390 -4% | 3534 0% | 2274 -36% | 3352 -5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
2% | -2% /
-2% | -23% /
-28% | 14% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3529 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2348 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
312.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
438.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2252 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1951 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
45.28 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
119.7 MB/s
DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 10940 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 23869 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7411 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3168 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ: Ø52.6 (48-56)
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
| GTA V (2015) | 156 | 145 | 88.1 | 45.3 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 156.8 | 90 | 53.6 | 31.5 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 128 | 116 | 109 | 105 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 90.1 | 46.3 | 32.5 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 86.8 | 73.5 | 62.7 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 188 | 76.5 | 62.2 | 53.6 |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF GeForce MX230, i7-1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Lite-On CA5-8D512 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -3% | 0% | -13% | -6% | |
| off / environment * | 25.9 | 26.7 -3% | 26.3 -2% | 30.3 -17% | 29.3 -13% |
| Idle Minimum * | 26 | 26.7 -3% | 26.5 -2% | 30.3 -17% | 29.3 -13% |
| Idle Average * | 26 | 26.7 -3% | 26.5 -2% | 30.3 -17% | 29.3 -13% |
| Idle Maximum * | 26 | 26.7 -3% | 26.5 -2% | 30.3 -17% | 30.8 -18% |
| Load Average * | 34.9 | 34 3% | 26.7 23% | 42.9 -23% | 35.7 -2% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 34.5 | 43.5 -26% | 40.7 -18% | 35.7 -3% | |
| Load Maximum * | 48.7 | 43.5 11% | 45.6 6% | 43.3 11% | 37.9 22% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 26 / 26 / 26 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 34.9 / 48.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 25.9 dB(A) | ||
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.4 °C / 84.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.6 °C / -1.1 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.4 °C / 84.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.6 °C / -1.1 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Strömförbrukning
| Av/Standby | 1.04 / 0.6 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 4.2 / 18.3 / 19.2 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
72.9 / 127.8 Watt |
   
| |
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.00 | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 14.00 | Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.50 | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF i7-1065G7, GeForce MX230, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel i7-10510U, GeForce MX350, Lite-On CA5-8D512, IPS LED, 2160x1440, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 33% | 39% | 51% | 39% | 33% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.2 | 4.5 -7% | 3.6 14% | 3 29% | 4.7 -12% | 3 29% |
| Idle Average * | 18.3 | 10.5 43% | 9.3 49% | 5.1 72% | 6.6 64% | 9 51% |
| Idle Maximum * | 19.2 | 10.6 45% | 10 48% | 6.4 67% | 5.9 69% | 11 43% |
| Load Average * | 72.9 | 44.2 39% | 40.6 44% | 39.6 46% | 56 23% | 60.8 17% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 61.5 | 45.8 26% | 44.3 28% | 39.6 36% | 56 9% | |
| Load Maximum * | 127.8 | 61.9 52% | 62.4 51% | 56.2 56% | 60.2 53% | 65.6 49% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Envy 14-eb0010nr i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, 63.3 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 9i 14ITL5 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 63.5 Wh | Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh | HP Spectre x360 14t-ea000 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 66 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF i7-1065G7, GeForce MX230, 42 Wh | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel i7-10510U, GeForce MX350, 56 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 26% | 68% | 34% | -27% | 24% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1661 | 2407 45% | 2205 33% | 2185 32% | 830 -50% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 649 | 658 1% | 505 -22% | 707 9% | 390 -40% | 768 18% |
| Load | 90 | 118 31% | 265 194% | 145 61% | 98 9% | 117 30% |
För
+ Stark CPU Turbo Boost prestanda
+ Hög prestanda i förhållande till volymen
+ Tysta fläktar vid låg belastning
+ Bekväma tangentbordsknappar
+ M.2 SSD som är lätt att komma åt
+ Förkalibrerad IPS-skärm
+ Stöd för USB-C laddning
+ Respektabel batteritid
+ Stöd för Thunderbolt 4
+ Robust designad bas
+ Webbkamera med skyddsöverdrag
Emot
- Aningen tyngre och tjockare än de flesta andra laptops på 14 tum
- Gångjärnen kunde varit fastare vid breda vinklar
- MicroSD-läsare istället för SD-läsare i full storlek
- Instabilt fläktljud vid belastning
- Fingeravtrycksläsaren ersätter en Ctrl-knapp
- Synligheten utomhus kunde varit bättre
- Fastlött RAM som inte går att uppgradera
- Klickplattans knappar känns svampiga
- Ingen plats för kabellås
- Hög DPC-latens
- Inget OLED-alternativ
- Ingen IR-kamera
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
I princip alla Ultrabook-modeller mindre än 15.6 tum med Core U-processorer har begränsad möjlighet att upprätthålla Turbo Boost och kommer antingen med integrerad- eller GeForce MX-grafik. Även om detta inte är ett problem för de flesta användarna får proffs som vill ha högre CPU- och GPU-prestanda oftast nöja sig med större modeller på 15.6 tum där det finns fler alternativ med GeForce GTX. 2021 års Envy 14 är en av få bärbara datorer på 14 tum som verkligen kan utnyttja de högre Turbo Boost-klockfrekvenserna från sin Tiger Lake och har stöd för samma GeForce GTX-alternativ som de större Spectre x360 15- och Dell XPS 15-serierna. Om du vill ha den snabbaste bärbara datorn på 14 tum som finns behöver du inte leta längre.
Envy 14 uppnår en bra balans mellan mobiliteten från en subnotebook på 14 tum och den höga prestandan från en multimedialaptop på 15.6 tum. Om du gör en hel del tungt grafikarbete samtidigt som du reser eller flyttar dig mellan olika lektioner passar den här kompakta HP-datorn perfekt.
Utöver den höga prestandan förtjänar andra fysiska egenskaper beröm, vilket inkluderar fasta tangentbordsknappar, enkel service och ett hälsosamt utbud av inbyggda portar. "Endast USB-C"-trenden med svårtillgängliga SSD-enheter gör att många andra laptops på 13 eller 14 tum behöver förlita sig väldigt mycket på USB-C adaptrar.
Systemet är inte perfekt, vilket vår långa lista över nackdelar visar. I synnerhet kunde gångjärnen varit fastare i breda vinklar samtidigt som bottenplattan kunde suttit tightare runt hörnena. En del gillar nog inte fingeravtrycksläsarens placering och IR-kameran saknar märkligt nog stöd för Windows Hello. Man får också förvänta sig mer fläktljud och högre temperaturer än på de flesta andra subnotebook-modeller vid krävande belastning, vilket inte är förvånande med tanke på den höga prestandan Envy 14 siktar på.
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
-
02/02/2021 v7
Allen Ngo
Multimedia - Vägt medel
Pricecompare
