Notebookcheck

Intel behövs inte: Asus TUF FX505DT - Test med Ryzen 7 och GeForce GTX 1650

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 07/08/2019

Ett alternativ till Intel Core i5. Det visar sig att Nvidias mittenskiktsgrafikkort passar väldigt bra ihop med AMD:s senaste processorserie Ryzen H. Asus släpper ännu fler Intel-fria speldatorer som gamers med tight budget bör överväga.

Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 (TUF FX505 Serie)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop) - 4096 MB, Kärna: 1395 MHz, Minne: 2001 MHz, GDDR5, 430.86, Optimus
Minne
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2666, Enkel kanal, SK Hynix, 17-17-17-39
Skärm
15.6 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, Panda LM156LF-GL, IPS, NCP0036, 120 Hz, glansig: nej
Moderkort
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Hårddisk
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, 512 GB 
Ljudkort
AMD Raven - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm kombinerad ljudanslutning
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 26.8 x 360.4 x 262
Batteri
48 Wh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: 720p
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2 W stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, McAfee LifeSafe, Asus Armoury Crate, 12 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.23 kg, Strömförsörjning: 417 g
Pris
900 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

384 mm 262 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg363 mm 255 mm 27 mm 2.2 kg360.4 mm 262 mm 26.8 mm 2.2 kg359 mm 254 mm 21.7 mm 1.9 kg360 mm 252 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg
Framsidan: Inga portar
Framsidan: Inga portar
Vänster: AC-adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, HDMI 2.0, USB 2.0 Typ A, 2x USB Typ A 3.1 Gen. 1, 3.5 mm kombinerad ljudanslutning
Vänster: AC-adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, HDMI 2.0, USB 2.0 Typ A, 2x USB Typ A 3.1 Gen. 1, 3.5 mm kombinerad ljudanslutning
Baksidan: Inga portar
Baksidan: Inga portar
Höger: Kensington-lås
Höger: Kensington-lås
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
671 MBit/s ∼99% +15%
Asus FX504GD
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
657 MBit/s ∼97% +12%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
586 MBit/s ∼86%
Asus TUF FX505DY
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
324 MBit/s ∼48% -45%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s ∼100% +11%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼100% +11%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
617 MBit/s ∼90%
Asus FX504GD
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
614 MBit/s ∼90% 0%
Asus TUF FX505DY
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
267 MBit/s ∼39% -57%
283.7
cd/m²
274.6
cd/m²
274.8
cd/m²
258.4
cd/m²
286.2
cd/m²
257
cd/m²
240.5
cd/m²
274.1
cd/m²
252.5
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 286.2 cd/m² Medel: 266.9 cd/m² Minimum: 16.7 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 84 %
Mitt på batteriet: 286.2 cd/m²
Kontrast: 867:1 (Svärta: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.45 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 4.47
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
59.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 37.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Panda LM156LF-GL, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus FX504GD
AU Optronics B156HTN03.8, TN LED, 15.6, 1920x1080
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
LG LP156WFC-SPD1 (LGD0563), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus TUF FX505DY
Panda LM156LF-CL03, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GF63 8RC
AU Optronics B156HAN02.1, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
72%
4%
-18%
-30%
-4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
30.4 (14, 16.4)
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
76%
41.6 (19.6, 22)
-37%
42 (20.8, 21.2)
-38%
44.8 (18.8, 26)
-47%
33.2 (15.2, 18)
-9%
Response Time Black / White *
27.6 (17.6, 10)
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
68%
15.2 (10, 5.2)
45%
26.8 (16, 10.8)
3%
30.8 (17.6, 13.2)
-12%
27.2 (15.6, 11.6)
1%
PWM Frequency
20830 (30)
Screen
31%
-20%
13%
6%
0%
Brightness middle
286.2
286
0%
260
-9%
238
-17%
211.5
-26%
266.6
-7%
Brightness
267
275
3%
241
-10%
226
-15%
200
-25%
257
-4%
Brightness Distribution
84
90
7%
85
1%
83
-1%
82
-2%
89
6%
Black Level *
0.33
0.37
-12%
0.55
-67%
0.27
18%
0.23
30%
0.29
12%
Contrast
867
773
-11%
473
-45%
881
2%
920
6%
919
6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.45
2.19
60%
7
-28%
4.11
25%
3.92
28%
5.93
-9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
18.08
4.4
76%
22.52
-25%
6.89
62%
17.63
2%
16.28
10%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.47
2.27
49%
5.27
-18%
3.76
16%
4.16
7%
3.6
19%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.3
2.2
58%
6.1
-15%
1.78
66%
3.1
42%
6.8
-28%
Gamma
2.1 105%
2.41 91%
1.97 112%
2.41 91%
2.23 99%
2.43 91%
CCT
7679 85%
6405 101%
7894 82%
6311 103%
6578 99%
7192 90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37.6
59
57%
35.5
-6%
36
-4%
38.1
1%
37.6
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
59.1
91
54%
61
3%
57
-4%
60
2%
59.3
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
52% / 37%
-8% / -16%
-3% / 9%
-12% / 0%
-2% / -0%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.6 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9439 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830Tooltip
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø741 (732.32-778.15)
Asus TUF FX505DY Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø725 (718.93-754.96)
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø707 (700.72-757)
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAL + HGST ST1000LM049 1 TB HDD; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø823 (815.58-828.24)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Alienware m17 P37E
Intel Core i9-8950HK
191 Points ∼88% +22%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points ∼87% +20%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
177 Points ∼81% +13%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H
176 Points ∼81% +12%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
Intel Core i7-8565U
174 Points ∼80% +11%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H
173 Points ∼79% +10%
MSI GF63 8RC
Intel Core i5-8300H
170 Points ∼78% +8%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
157 Points ∼72%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points ∼72% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
  (144 - 157, n=2)
151 Points ∼69% -4%
Asus TUF FX505DY
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
145 Points ∼67% -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points ∼39% +115%
Alienware m17 P37E
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1238 Points ∼28% +55%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1182 Points ∼27% +48%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H
1116 Points ∼26% +40%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
  (799 - 805, n=2)
802 Points ∼18% 0%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
799 Points ∼18%
MSI GF63 8RC
Intel Core i5-8300H
777 Points ∼18% -3%
Asus TUF FX505DY
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
757 Points ∼17% -5%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H
757 Points ∼17% -5%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points ∼17% -8%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
Intel Core i7-8565U
651 Points ∼15% -19%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
157 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
799 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
85.75 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Hjälp
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
6936 Points ∼62% +31%
Average of class Gaming
  (1764 - 11191, n=172)
6250 Points ∼56% +18%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5282 Points ∼47%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5178 Points ∼46% -2%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAL + HGST ST1000LM049 1 TB HDD
4665 Points ∼42% -12%
Asus TUF FX505DY
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4528 Points ∼40% -14%
Asus FX504GD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
3843 Points ∼34% -27%
Productivity
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
7661 Points ∼79% +18%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
7310 Points ∼75% +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (4175 - 8968, n=173)
7124 Points ∼73% +9%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
6518 Points ∼67%
Asus TUF FX505DY
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
6446 Points ∼67% -1%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAL + HGST ST1000LM049 1 TB HDD
6385 Points ∼66% -2%
Asus FX504GD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
5927 Points ∼61% -9%
Essentials
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
9231 Points ∼87% +10%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
8819 Points ∼83% +6%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAL + HGST ST1000LM049 1 TB HDD
8457 Points ∼79% +1%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8355 Points ∼78%
Average of class Gaming
  (4892 - 10668, n=174)
8345 Points ∼78% 0%
Asus TUF FX505DY
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
7949 Points ∼75% -5%
Asus FX504GD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
6583 Points ∼62% -21%
Score
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
5654 Points ∼73% +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=175)
5149 Points ∼66% +9%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4973 Points ∼64% +5%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4732 Points ∼61%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAL + HGST ST1000LM049 1 TB HDD
4527 Points ∼58% -4%
Asus TUF FX505DY
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4405 Points ∼57% -7%
Asus FX504GD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
3808 Points ∼49% -20%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus TUF FX505DY
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
5223 Points ∼80% +11%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAL + HGST ST1000LM049 1 TB HDD
5208 Points ∼80% +11%
Asus FX504GD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
5018 Points ∼77% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=361)
5006 Points ∼77% +6%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4701 Points ∼72%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus TUF FX505DY
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4560 Points ∼75% +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (3917 - 6093, n=379)
4239 Points ∼70% +8%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8300H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAL + HGST ST1000LM049 1 TB HDD
3931 Points ∼65% 0%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
3917 Points ∼64%
Asus FX504GD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
3909 Points ∼64% 0%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3917 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4701 poäng
Hjälp
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Asus TUF FX505DY
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU
Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11
AS SSD
7%
11%
-53%
5%
Copy Game MB/s
866.7
480.25
-45%
239.44
-72%
1029.3
19%
Copy Program MB/s
444.49
506.75
14%
141.68
-68%
485.8
9%
Copy ISO MB/s
942.16
1166.32
24%
321.28
-66%
1595.45
69%
Score Total
1717
1899
11%
1663
-3%
850
-50%
1495
-13%
Score Write
992
730
-26%
514
-48%
388
-61%
487
-51%
Score Read
472
762
61%
763
62%
305
-35%
679
44%
Access Time Write *
0.047
0.034
28%
0.038
19%
0.063
-34%
0.063
-34%
Access Time Read *
0.065
0.087
-34%
0.085
-31%
0.069
-6%
4K-64 Write
787.44
501.87
-36%
273.64
-65%
276.74
-65%
281.49
-64%
4K-64 Read
321.49
618.95
93%
536.48
67%
236.2
-27%
477.27
48%
4K Write
115.48
110.59
-4%
97.03
-16%
72.21
-37%
103.4
-10%
4K Read
48.22
37.55
-22%
46.1
-4%
19.47
-60%
40.03
-17%
Seq Write
888.5
1179.95
33%
1429.35
61%
390.22
-56%
1017.09
14%
Seq Read
1019.04
1058.74
4%
1808.33
77%
490.6
-52%
1616.93
59%

* ... smaller is better

Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1732 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 958.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 340.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 237.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1564 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 983.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 56.96 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 137.5 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
7732 Points ∼54% +117%
Aorus 15 W9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H
6007 Points ∼42% +68%
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H
5931 Points ∼42% +66%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 3750H
4867 Points ∼34% +36%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
3572 Points ∼25% 0%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H
3568 Points ∼25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (3433 - 3700, n=8)
3519 Points ∼25% -1%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), 2700X
3492 Points ∼25% -2%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
2536 Points ∼18% -29%
Asus TUF FX505DY
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 3550H
1790 Points ∼13% -50%
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H
1597 Points ∼11% -55%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
862 Points ∼6% -76%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
19338 Points ∼48% +105%
Aorus 15 W9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H
15501 Points ∼38% +64%
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H
15164 Points ∼37% +61%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 3750H
13355 Points ∼33% +42%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
11483 Points ∼28% +22%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H
9428 Points ∼23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (9045 - 9428, n=8)
9263 Points ∼23% -2%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), 2700X
9195 Points ∼23% -2%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
7791 Points ∼19% -17%
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H
6356 Points ∼16% -33%
Asus TUF FX505DY
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 3550H
6327 Points ∼16% -33%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
2874 Points ∼7% -70%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
13742 Points ∼61% +101%
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H
11914 Points ∼53% +74%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), 2700X
11707 Points ∼52% +71%
Aorus 15 W9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H
9981 Points ∼44% +46%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (6528 - 12056, n=7)
9098 Points ∼40% +33%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
8540 Points ∼38% +25%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
7696 Points ∼34% +13%
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H
7025 Points ∼31% +3%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H
6838 Points ∼30%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 3750H
6644 Points ∼29% -3%
Asus TUF FX505DY
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 3550H
6447 Points ∼29% -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
3707 Points ∼16% -46%
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
26413 Points ∼52% +95%
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H
20862 Points ∼41% +54%
Aorus 15 W9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H
20464 Points ∼40% +51%
Asus ROG GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 3750H
17170 Points ∼34% +26%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
14550 Points ∼29% +7%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), 2700X
13759 Points ∼27% +1%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 3750H
13575 Points ∼27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (13004 - 13575, n=9)
13236 Points ∼26% -2%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
9466 Points ∼19% -30%
Asus TUF FX505DY
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 3550H
8181 Points ∼16% -40%
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H
7133 Points ∼14% -47%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8565U
3560 Points ∼7% -74%
3DMark 11 Performance
10963 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
21151 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
8154 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
3559 poäng
Hjälp
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
90 fps ∼100% +120%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
79 (min: 52) fps ∼88% +93%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
78 fps ∼87% +90%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)
76.7 fps ∼85% +87%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
65 fps ∼72% +59%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
49 fps ∼54% +20%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
44 (min: 9) fps ∼49% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (41 - 46, n=4)
44 fps ∼49% +7%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
41 fps ∼46%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
31 fps ∼34% -24%
Asus GL753VD
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
26 (min: 3) fps ∼29% -37%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
23 fps ∼26% -44%
1280x720 Lowest Preset
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
134 fps ∼100% +116%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
133 fps ∼99% +115%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)
126.8 fps ∼95% +105%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
95 (min: 65) fps ∼71% +53%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
93 fps ∼69% +50%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (57 - 128, n=3)
82.3 fps ∼61% +33%
Asus GL753VD
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
71 (min: 48) fps ∼53% +15%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
63 fps ∼47% +2%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
62 fps ∼46% 0%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
62 fps ∼46%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
54 fps ∼40% -13%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
72.7 (min: 61, max: 82) fps ∼100% +101%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
63 fps ∼87% +74%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)
62 (min: 43, max: 74) fps ∼85% +71%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
55.1 fps ∼76% +52%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
48.8 fps ∼67% +35%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
36.2 fps ∼50%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
35.4 (min: 28) fps ∼49% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
  (33.1 - 37.7, n=9)
35.2 fps ∼48% -3%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
25.8 fps ∼35% -29%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
20.6 fps ∼28% -43%
010203040506070