Notebookcheck

Test: Sony Xperia 10 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 04/29/2019

Fickbiograf. Sony försöker bryta ny mark på smartphonemarknaden med nya Xperia-enheter. Xperia 10 är deras senaste försök att slå sig in på mittenskiktssektorn och telefonen är utrustad med en Snapdragon 630 SoC och en skärm på 6 tum som har ett 21:9-bildförhållande. Det sistnämna gör att enheten kan hålla sitt fotavtryck på en minimal nivå men ändå ha en stor skärm. Läs vidare i den här detaljerade recensionen för att få reda på hur Xperia 10 presterar i våra tester och hur den står sig mot sina konkurrenter från mittenskiktet.

Sony Xperia 10 (Xperia Serie)
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 508
Minne
3072 MB 
, 3 GB
Skärm
6 tum 21:9, 2520 x 1080 pixlar 457 PPI, Kapacitiv multitouch, IPS LCD, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 46.8 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: upp till 512 GB microSD-kort, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Kompass, Hall-sensor, Närhetssensor, USB Typ C, OTG, Miracast, Status-LED, FM-radio
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B2, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B5, B7, B8, B20, B28, B32, B38., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.4 x 156 x 68
Batteri
2870 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix , f/2.0, 27 mm, 1/3", 1.12 μm. 5MP vidvinkels-sensor, f/2.4, 22 mm, 1/4", 1.4 μm. Camera2 API Level: Limited
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix , f/2.0, 24 mm, 1/4", 1.12 μm
Övrigt
Högtalare: Mono, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, modulär nätadapter, USB-kabel, hörlurar, Sony UI, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: 1.31 W/kg – Kropp, 0.9 W/kg – Huvud. LTE Cat.12: 600 Mbps/100 Mbps. DRM Widevine: L1, fanless
Vikt
162 g, Strömförsörjning: 44 g
Pris
350 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Sony Xperia 10
Sony Xperia 10
Sony Xperia 10
Sony Xperia 10
Sony Xperia 10
Sony Xperia 10
Sony Xperia 10
Sony Xperia 10
Sony Xperia 10
Sony Xperia 10

Storleksjämförelse

161.4 mm 76.9 mm 7.9 mm 178 g159.21 mm 75.21 mm 8.1 mm 186 g157 mm 75.3 mm 8 mm 172 g156 mm 68 mm 8.4 mm 162 g155.5 mm 75.2 mm 8.8 mm 182 g154.8 mm 75.8 mm 8 mm 180 g154.9 mm 74.8 mm 7.6 mm 175 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
675 (min: 630, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100% +102%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 444, max: 499) MBit/s ∼73% +47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
350 (min: 327, max: 361) MBit/s ∼52% +5%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 (min: 326, max: 341) MBit/s ∼49%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 273, max: 341) MBit/s ∼46% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (min: 265, max: 284) MBit/s ∼41% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=409)
222 MBit/s ∼33% -34%
Motorola Moto G7
Adreno 506, 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash
112 (min: 94, max: 118) MBit/s ∼17% -66%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 (min: 42, max: 58) MBit/s ∼8% -84%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 (min: 598, max: 665) MBit/s ∼100% +156%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
429 (min: 256, max: 448) MBit/s ∼66% +70%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (min: 164, max: 362) MBit/s ∼49% +26%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
300 (min: 169, max: 367) MBit/s ∼46% +19%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
253 (min: 128, max: 283) MBit/s ∼39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
238 (min: 189, max: 285) MBit/s ∼37% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=409)
212 MBit/s ∼33% -16%
Motorola Moto G7
Adreno 506, 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash
112 (min: 107, max: 117) MBit/s ∼17% -56%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 32 GB eMMC Flash
43.1 (min: 18, max: 66) MBit/s ∼7% -83%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø333 (326-341)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø248 (128-283)
GPS-Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Översikt
GPS-Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Översikt
GPS-Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cykeltur runt en sjö
GPS-Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cykeltur runt en sjö
GPS-Test: Garmin Edge 500 – En snäv kurva
GPS-Test: Garmin Edge 500 – En snäv kurva
GPS-Test: Sony Xperia 10 – Översikt
GPS-Test: Sony Xperia 10 – Översikt
GPS-Test: Sony Xperia 10 – Cykeltur runt en sjö
GPS-Test: Sony Xperia 10 – Cykeltur runt en sjö
GPS-Test: Sony Xperia 10 – En snäv kurva
GPS-Test: Sony Xperia 10 – En snäv kurva
Standard photo
Standard photo
Bokeh-läge
Bokeh-läge
HDR
HDR
Den inbyggda kamera-appen: Fotolägen
Den inbyggda kamera-appen: Fotolägen
Den inbyggda kamera-appen: Sökare
Den inbyggda kamera-appen: Sökare
Den inbyggda kamera-appen: Fotoalternativ
Den inbyggda kamera-appen: Fotoalternativ
Den inbyggda kamera-appen: Manuellt läge
Den inbyggda kamera-appen: Manuellt läge
Den inbyggda kamera-appen: Videoläge
Den inbyggda kamera-appen: Videoläge
Den inbyggda kamera-appen: Videoinställningar
Den inbyggda kamera-appen: Videoinställningar

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Foto av vår testkarta
Foto av vår testkarta
Testkartan i detalj
516
cd/m²
548
cd/m²
520
cd/m²
524
cd/m²
547
cd/m²
511
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 548 cd/m² Medel: 525.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5.57 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 547 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1519:1 (Svärta: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
97.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17
Sony Xperia 10
IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6
Motorola Moto G7
IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2
Nokia 8.1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
TFT, 1480x720, 6
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Xiaomi Mi 8
AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.21
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6
Screen
-15%
-10%
-11%
18%
4%
0%
36%
Brightness middle
547
471
-14%
567
4%
512
-6%
541
-1%
489
-11%
430
-21%
570
4%
Brightness
525
453
-14%
547
4%
508
-3%
540
3%
486
-7%
434
-17%
565
8%
Brightness Distribution
93
94
1%
92
-1%
95
2%
91
-2%
93
0%
94
1%
93
0%
Black Level *
0.36
0.5
-39%
0.61
-69%
0.28
22%
0.33
8%
0.34
6%
Contrast
1519
942
-38%
930
-39%
1829
20%
1639
8%
1438
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.6
5.5
-20%
4.39
5%
5.6
-22%
2.7
41%
3.8
17%
5.09
-11%
1.5
67%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
12.1
7.95
34%
7.28
40%
11.8
2%
4.6
62%
7.1
41%
8.05
33%
3.6
70%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.9
5
-28%
4.9
-26%
8
-105%
3.1
21%
4.4
-13%
3.3
15%
1.2
69%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.326 95%
2.248 98%
2.14 103%
2.26 97%
2.22 99%
2.257 97%
2.07 106%
CCT
7158 91%
7654 85%
7642 85%
7831 83%
6853 95%
7213 90%
7026 93%
6504 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2336 Hz ≤ 17 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2336 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2336 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9429 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CalMAN: Färgprecision – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, egen vitbalans
CalMAN: Färgprecision – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, egen vitbalans
CalMAN: Färgrymd – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, egen vitbalans
CalMAN: Färgrymd – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, egen vitbalans
CalMAN: Gråskala – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, egen vitbalans
CalMAN: Gråskala – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, egen vitbalans
CalMAN: Färgmättnad – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, egen vitbalans
CalMAN: Färgmättnad – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, egen vitbalans
CalMAN: Färgprecision – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, standard-vitbalans
CalMAN: Färgprecision – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, standard-vitbalans
CalMAN: Färgrymd – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, standard-vitbalans
CalMAN: Färgrymd – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, standard-vitbalans
CalMAN: Gråskala – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, standard-vitbalans
CalMAN: Gråskala – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, standard-vitbalans
CalMAN: Färgmättnad – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, standard-vitbalans
CalMAN: Färgmättnad – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, standard-vitbalans
CalMAN: Färgprecision – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, levande vitbalans
CalMAN: Färgprecision – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, levande vitbalans
CalMAN: Färgrymd – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, levande vitbalans
CalMAN: Färgrymd – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, levande vitbalans
CalMAN: Gråskala – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, levande vitbalans
CalMAN: Gråskala – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, levande vitbalans
CalMAN: Färgmättnad – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, levande vitbalans
CalMAN: Färgmättnad – sRGB-färgrymd som mål, levande vitbalans

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
64.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 28.4 ms rise
↘ 36.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.2 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3763 Points ∼26%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
4006 Points ∼28% +6%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6813 Points ∼47% +81%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
1411 Points ∼10% -63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5576 Points ∼39% +48%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14369 Points ∼100% +282%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13371 Points ∼93% +255%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4026 Points ∼28% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (2910 - 3956, n=12)
3718 Points ∼26% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=307)
4559 Points ∼32% +21%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3986 Points ∼43%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
4765 Points ∼52% +20%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5856 Points ∼64% +47%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
1801 Points ∼20% -55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5913 Points ∼64% +48%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9182 Points ∼100% +130%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8907 Points ∼97% +123%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4429 Points ∼48% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (2246 - 4234, n=13)
4009 Points ∼44% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=362)
4549 Points ∼50% +14%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
837 Points ∼34%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1256 Points ∼51% +50%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1799 Points ∼73% +115%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
644 Points ∼26% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1639 Points ∼66% +96%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2468 Points ∼100% +195%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2430 Points ∼98% +190%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1525 Points ∼62% +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (710 - 885, n=13)
853 Points ∼35% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=364)
1354 Points ∼55% +62%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5987 Points ∼74%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
6038 Points ∼75% +1%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6887 Points ∼85% +15%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
3243 Points ∼40% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6187 Points ∼76% +3%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8101 Points ∼100% +35%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7983 Points ∼99% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5387 Points ∼66% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (4636 - 5987, n=12)
4968 Points ∼61% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=357)
4997 Points ∼62% -17%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4948 Points ∼51%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
7187 Points ∼74% +45%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8309 Points ∼86% +68%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
4088 Points ∼42% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
6870 Points ∼71% +39%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9664 Points ∼100% +95%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9689 Points ∼100% +96%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5625 Points ∼58% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (4948 - 6264, n=13)
5632 Points ∼58% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=525)
5466 Points ∼56% +10%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2167 Points ∼89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
 
2167 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1779 - 15735, n=44)
2435 Points ∼100% +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
693 Points ∼28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
 
693 Points ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (209 - 14536, n=44)
2471 Points ∼100% +257%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
861 Points ∼41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
 
861 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (260 - 14786, n=47)
2125 Points ∼100% +147%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1664 Points ∼60%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2206 Points ∼80% +33%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2534 Points ∼92% +52%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2768 Points ∼100% +66%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2257 Points ∼82% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2215 Points ∼80% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1845 Points ∼67% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1664 - 1778, n=13)
1710 Points ∼62% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=372)
1830 Points ∼66% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
792 Points ∼18%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
467 Points ∼10% -41%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1845 Points ∼41% +133%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1262 Points ∼28% +59%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4468 Points ∼100% +464%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4471 Points ∼100% +465%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
629 Points ∼14% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (767 - 809, n=13)
797 Points ∼18% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=372)
1598 Points ∼36% +102%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
896 Points ∼24%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
566 Points ∼15% -37%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1964 Points ∼54% +119%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1436 Points ∼39% +60%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3669 Points ∼100% +309%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3646 Points ∼99% +307%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
737 Points ∼20% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (872 - 919, n=13)
904 Points ∼25% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=375)
1484 Points ∼40% +66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1732 Points ∼61%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2201 Points ∼78% +27%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2516 Points ∼89% +45%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
896 Points ∼32% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2772 Points ∼98% +60%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2832 Points ∼100% +64%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2181 Points ∼77% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1871 Points ∼66% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1657 - 1819, n=13)
1731 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=386)
1805 Points ∼64% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1299 Points ∼19%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
809 Points ∼12% -38%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2855 Points ∼41% +120%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
250 Points ∼4% -81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2006 Points ∼29% +54%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6898 Points ∼100% +431%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5328 Points ∼77% +310%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
954 Points ∼14% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1204 - 1332, n=13)
1302 Points ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=386)
2194 Points ∼32% +69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1375 Points ∼26%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
941 Points ∼18% -32%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2772 Points ∼53% +102%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
298 Points ∼6% -78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2073 Points ∼40% +51%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5230 Points ∼100% +280%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4034 Points ∼77% +193%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1071 Points ∼20% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1299 - 1415, n=13)
1379 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=387)
1860 Points ∼36% +35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1645 Points ∼61%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2251 Points ∼83% +37%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2514 Points ∼93% +53%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2708 Points ∼100% +65%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2528 Points ∼93% +54%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2137 Points ∼79% +30%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1821 Points ∼67% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1631 - 1822, n=13)
1734 Points ∼64% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=448)
1760 Points ∼65% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
704 Points ∼15%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
419 Points ∼9% -40%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1702 Points ∼36% +142%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1189 Points ∼25% +69%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4746 Points ∼100% +574%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4010 Points ∼84% +470%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
634 Points ∼13% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (704 - 729, n=13)
718 Points ∼15% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=450)
1324 Points ∼28% +88%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
809 Points ∼20%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
512 Points ∼13% -37%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1834 Points ∼46% +127%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1358 Points ∼34% +68%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3972 Points ∼100% +391%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3356 Points ∼84% +315%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
741 Points ∼19% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (809 - 839, n=13)
825 Points ∼21% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=458)
1262 Points ∼32% +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1687 Points ∼60%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2273 Points ∼80% +35%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2467 Points ∼87% +46%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
899 Points ∼32% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2834 Points ∼100% +68%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2720 Points ∼96% +61%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2124 Points ∼75% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1829 Points ∼65% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1687 - 1816, n=13)
1746 Points ∼62% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=480)
1667 Points ∼59% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1235 Points ∼15%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
780 Points ∼9% -37%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼33% +124%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
54 Points ∼1% -96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1925 Points ∼23% +56%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8261 Points ∼100% +569%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6243 Points ∼76% +406%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
845 Points ∼10% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1234 - 1289, n=13)
1258 Points ∼15% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=480)
1801 Points ∼22% +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1315 Points ∼23%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
913 Points ∼16% -31%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2691 Points ∼47% +105%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
68 Points ∼1% -95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2073 Points ∼36% +58%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5687 Points ∼100% +332%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4363 Points ∼77% +232%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
960 Points ∼17% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1315 - 1374, n=13)
1341 Points ∼24% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=488)
1541 Points ∼27% +17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
12437 Points ∼36%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
16647 Points ∼48% +34%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14820 Points ∼42% +19%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
10416 Points ∼30% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
19087 Points ∼55% +53%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34928 Points ∼100% +181%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
27858 Points ∼80% +124%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13914 Points ∼40% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (12437 - 13217, n=13)
12963 Points ∼37% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=640)
13636 Points ∼39% +10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
17878 Points ∼22%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
14475 Points ∼18% -19%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
39655 Points ∼48% +122%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
5447 Points ∼7% -70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
29496 Points ∼36% +65%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
82125 Points ∼100% +359%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
77203 Points ∼94% +332%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15567 Points ∼19% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (16508 - 18635, n=13)
18279 Points ∼22% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11427 - 162695, n=640)
19988 Points ∼24% +12%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
16290 Points ∼26%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
14907 Points ∼24% -8%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
28895 Points ∼46% +77%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
6093 Points ∼10% -63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
26308 Points ∼42% +61%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
63159 Points ∼100% +288%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
55397 Points ∼88% +240%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15167 Points ∼24% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (15466 - 17032, n=13)
16750 Points ∼27% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11565 - 83518, n=641)
16573 Points ∼26% +2%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
29 fps ∼19%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
24 fps ∼16% -17%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
65 fps ∼43% +124%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
7.6 fps ∼5% -74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
51 fps ∼34% +76%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
150 fps ∼100% +417%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
120 fps ∼80% +314%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (29 - 30, n=13)
29.7 fps ∼20% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=669)
35 fps ∼23% +21%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
25 fps ∼42%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
23 fps ∼38% -8%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
57 fps ∼95% +128%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
13 fps ∼22% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
44 fps ∼73% +76%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +140%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +140%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (25 - 31, n=13)
29.2 fps ∼49% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=672)
26.9 fps ∼45% +8%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
13 fps ∼18%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
10 fps ∼14% -23%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
32 fps ∼45% +146%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
2.8 fps ∼4% -78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
23 fps ∼32% +77%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
71 fps ∼100% +446%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
67 fps ∼94% +415%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (13 - 14, n=13)
13.8 fps ∼19% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=588)
19.3 fps ∼27% +48%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
11 fps ∼19%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
9.9 fps ∼17% -10%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
31 fps ∼53% +182%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
5.5 fps ∼9% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
20 fps ∼34% +82%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +427%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
56 fps ∼97% +409%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (11 - 15, n=13)
13.8 fps ∼24% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=593)
17.8 fps ∼31% +62%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
9.5 fps ∼20%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
6.9 fps ∼15% -27%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
23 fps ∼49% +142%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
15 fps ∼32% +58%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼74% +268%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
47 fps ∼100% +395%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (5.2 - 10, n=13)
9.38 fps ∼20% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=449)
15.9 fps ∼34% +67%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
7.8 fps ∼14%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
6.5 fps ∼12% -17%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
22 fps ∼41% +182%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
13 fps ∼24% +67%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
54 fps ∼100% +592%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
45 fps ∼83% +477%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (5.3 - 11, n=13)
9.36 fps ∼17% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=452)
15.2 fps ∼28% +95%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2.7 fps ∼12%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2 fps ∼9% -26%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8.2 fps ∼37% +204%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
4.8 fps ∼22% +78%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼100% +715%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼100% +715%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (2.7 - 3.2, n=4)
3.03 fps ∼14% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=152)
8.97 fps ∼41% +232%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1.7 fps ∼12%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1.2 fps ∼9% -29%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5 fps ∼36% +194%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
3.2 fps ∼23% +88%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼100% +724%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼100% +724%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1.7 - 1.9, n=4)
1.825 fps ∼13% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=152)
6.2 fps ∼44% +265%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.4 fps ∼13%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.6 fps ∼10% -18%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼37% +195%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
7.6 fps ∼22% +73%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31 fps ∼89% +605%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100% +695%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (4.4 - 5.4, n=4)
5.05 fps ∼14% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=154)
13.5 fps ∼39% +207%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.9 fps ∼14%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.9 fps ∼11% -20%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14 fps ∼41% +186%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.7 fps ∼26% +78%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32 fps ∼94% +553%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34 fps ∼100% +594%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (4.9 - 5.6, n=4)
5.28 fps ∼16% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=153)
14.8 fps ∼44% +202%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5.3 fps ∼15%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.9 fps ∼11% -26%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼37% +145%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
9.1 fps ∼26% +72%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100% +560%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
26 fps ∼74% +391%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (5.3 - 5.6, n=13)
5.48 fps ∼16% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=378)
10.7 fps ∼31% +102%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.3 fps ∼13%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.6 fps ∼11% -16%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼36% +179%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
7.8 fps ∼24% +81%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +667%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
28 fps ∼85% +551%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (4.3 - 6, n=13)
5.48 fps ∼17% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=382)
9.65 fps ∼29% +124%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
88287 Points ∼34%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
108408 Points ∼41% +23%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
169262 Points ∼64% +92%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
41483 Points ∼16% -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
143352 Points ∼54% +62%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
263165 Points ∼100% +198%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
122826 Points ∼47% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (87300 - 90674, n=11)
89396 Points ∼34% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=270)
130378 Points ∼50% +48%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
815 Points ∼63%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1008 Points ∼78% +24%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1077 Points ∼83% +32%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
685 Points ∼53% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1086 Points ∼84% +33%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1296 Points ∼100% +59%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1292 Points ∼100% +59%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1090 Points ∼84% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (666 - 936, n=13)
859 Points ∼66% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=600)
741 Points ∼57% -9%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1409 Points ∼18%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1075 Points ∼14% -24%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
3086 Points ∼39% +119%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
446 Points ∼6% -68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2308 Points ∼29% +64%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7945 Points ∼100% +464%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7895 Points ∼99% +460%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1356 Points ∼17% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1409 - 1523, n=13)
1494 Points ∼19% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=600)
1942 Points ∼24% +38%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
983 Points ∼30%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1963 Points ∼60% +100%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2947 Points ∼90% +200%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
643 Points ∼20% -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2332 Points ∼72% +137%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3239 Points ∼99% +230%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3261 Points ∼100% +232%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2445 Points ∼75% +149%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (838 - 1405, n=13)
1199 Points ∼37% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=600)
1446 Points ∼44% +47%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3159 Points ∼48%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
4378 Points ∼66% +39%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5681 Points ∼86% +80%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
1239 Points ∼19% -61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5141 Points ∼78% +63%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6506 Points ∼98% +106%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6620 Points ∼100% +110%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4506 Points ∼68% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1763 - 3319, n=13)
3147 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=600)
2852 Points ∼43% -10%
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1374 Points ∼36%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1747 Points ∼45% +27%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2731 Points ∼71% +99%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
702 Points ∼18% -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2342 Points ∼61% +70%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3838 Points ∼100% +179%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3852 Points ∼100% +180%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2009 Points ∼52% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
  (1152 - 1570, n=13)
1479 Points ∼38% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=604)
1418 Points ∼37% +3%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (14.6 - 108, n=79)
30.7 Points ∼100% +89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
16.3 Points ∼53% 0%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
16.254 Points ∼53%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
83 Points ∼100% +113%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
72 Points ∼87% +85%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=132)
63.5 Points ∼77% +63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
61 Points ∼73% +56%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
58 Points ∼70% +49%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
57 Points ∼69% +46%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
39 Points ∼47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (35 - 39, n=5)
37.6 Points ∼45% -4%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72)
25 Points ∼30% -36%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
15086 Points ∼100% +210%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
14514 Points ∼96% +198%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
12717 Points ∼84% +161%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
10679 Points ∼71% +120%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
9165 Points ∼61% +88%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
8351 Points ∼55% +72%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=661)
6268 Points ∼42% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=13)
4963 Points ∼33% +2%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
4865 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72)
3374 Points ∼22% -31%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72)
13548.5 ms * ∼100% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=681)
10805 ms * ∼80% -5%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
10256.9 ms * ∼76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10257, n=13)
9702 ms * ∼72% +5%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
4900 ms * ∼36% +52%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
4122.8 ms * ∼30% +60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72)
3948 ms * ∼29% +62%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
3034.9 ms * ∼22% +70%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
2818 ms * ∼21% +73%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
2713.6 ms * ∼20% +74%

* ... smaller is better

Sony Xperia 10Motorola Moto G7Nokia 8.1Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018Xiaomi Redmi Note 7Xiaomi Pocophone F1Xiaomi Mi 8Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
78%
-6%
-9%
9%
41%
86%
2%
3%
-14%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
58.27 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
61.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
59.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
65.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
64.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
56.3 (58.4 - 74.7, n=100)
-12%
48.6 (9.5 - 87.1, n=403)
-24%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
84.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
76.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
83.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
78.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
74.3 (76.1 - 87.2, n=100)
-11%
66.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=403)
-20%
Random Write 4KB
14.39
75.6
425%
7.3
-49%
12.71
-12%
16.06
12%
17.81
24%
21
46%
15.45
7%
24.3 (3.4 - 88.2, n=109)
69%
20.1 (0.14 - 250, n=711)
40%
Random Read 4KB
53.12
69.3
30%
69.9
32%
64.64
22%
82.94
56%
101.01
90%
136.3
157%
83.98
58%
54.3 (11.4 - 149, n=109)
2%
44.8 (1.59 - 175, n=711)
-16%
Sequential Write 256KB
232.87
216
-7%
203.8
-12%
95.57
-59%
204.72
-12%
155.57
-33%
207.8
-11%
104.87
-55%
171 (40 - 246, n=109)
-27%
92.1 (2.99 - 503, n=711)
-60%
Sequential Read 256KB
273.8
297
8%
279.3
2%
292.87
7%
283.36
3%
705.38
158%
693.2
153%
295.76
8%
272 (95.6 - 704, n=109)
-1%
258 (12.1 - 1468, n=711)
-6%
PUBG Mobile
0102030Tooltip
: Ø24.7 (17-26)
Asphalt Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø24.5 (19-30)
; Standard / low: Ø28.8 (24-31)
Hög belastning
 37.7 °C36.1 °C30.1 °C 
 38.6 °C33.2 °C28.9 °C 
 35 °C32.5 °C29.3 °C 
Max: 38.6 °C
Medel: 33.5 °C
27.9 °C30.8 °C36.4 °C
27.6 °C29.4 °C36.6 °C
28.1 °C29.8 °C34.6 °C
Max: 36.6 °C
Medel: 31.2 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  36.3 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.234.62527.832.33124.125.24024.922.25033.336.26323.8278026.228.210026.229.712517.422.716017.231.520017.336.725016.44831516.255.840015.759.350014.664.763016.369.780013.472.4100013.872125014.371.7160013.874.1200014.372.8250014.673.6315013.776.8400014.578500014.476630014.374.8800014.671.81000014.669.61250014.561.81600014.846.6SPL26.786N0.864.6median 14.6median 69.7Delta1.412.638.735.637.138.733.733.337.433.436.336.828.329.923.726.423.224.12230.520.442.218.445.417.75017.354.817.759.218.161.62066.216.367.115.57514.17714.174.614.571.714.366.51565.214.765.816.965.815.369.21573.614.573.214.758.214.555.96727.983.419.4154.5median 15.5median 65.82.38.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSony Xperia 10Motorola Moto G7
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Sony Xperia 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Motorola Moto G7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.16 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.72 / 2.16 / 2.17 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.32 / 5.34 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Motorola Moto G7
3000 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
3300 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-22%
8%
-5%
-15%
-14%
-64%
-7%
-1%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
0.72
1.1
-53%
0.8
-11%
0.64
11%
0.61
15%
0.65
10%
1.5
-108%
0.71
1%
0.732 (0.35 - 1.4, n=13)
-2%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=743)
-22%
Idle Average *
2.16
1.8
17%
1.5
31%
1.81
16%
1.95
10%
1.97
9%
2.2
-2%
1.36
37%
1.835 (1 - 2.31, n=13)
15%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=742)
20%
Idle Maximum *
2.17
2.6
-20%
1.8
17%
1.91
12%
2.03
6%
2.01
7%
2.6
-20%
1.47
32%
2.16 (1.4 - 3.8, n=13)
-0%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=743)
7%
Load Average *
3.32
4.2
-27%
3.2
4%
4.88
-47%
4.56
-37%
4.29
-29%
6.1
-84%
5.13
-55%
3.81 (2.82 - 6.2, n=13)
-15%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=737)
-22%
Load Maximum *
5.34
6.8
-27%
5.4
-1%
6.38
-19%
9.15
-71%
9.05
-69%
10.9
-104%
7.89
-48%
5.62 (4.56 - 8, n=13)
-5%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=737)
-10%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
16tim 46min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
9tim 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10tim 20min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
3tim 53min
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Motorola Moto G7
3000 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
3300 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
32%
37%
40%
50%
51%
34%
28%
Reader / Idle
1006
1548
54%
1682
67%
2080
107%
1950
94%
2088
108%
1634
62%
1467
46%
H.264
620
819
32%
857
38%
706
14%
940
52%
936
51%
897
45%
836
35%
WiFi v1.3
541
798
48%
738
36%
651
20%
768
42%
808
49%
736
36%
605
12%
Load
233
219
-6%
246
6%
272
17%
259
11%
220
-6%
215
-8%
273
17%

För

+ ljusstark IPS-skärm
+ högt kontrastförhållande
+ välbyggd
+ NFC
+ Bluetooth 5.0
+ bra fingeravtrycksläsare
+ hörlursanslutning

Emot

- ganska långsam SoC
- eMMC-lagring
- baksida i plast
- kamerorna var en besvikelse
- endast 3 GB RAM
Recension av Sony Xperia 10. Recensionsex från Sony Germany.
Recension av Sony Xperia 10. Recensionsex från Sony Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Sony Xperia 10 är ett intressant förslag. Den kommer att tilltala den som gillar kompakta smartphones eftersom 21:9-förhållandet gör den märkbart smalare än konkurrenterna.

Den förlängda IPS-skärmen har dock sina brister. Vår recensionsenhet var väldigt tung i toppen och många applikationer har inte stöd för 21:9, vilket gör att man istället får innehållet i 16:9. I appar som YouTube går det att zooma in på en majoritet av innehållet, men då slutar det med att du får en kraftigt beskärd bild eller video. I korthet hade det kunnat vara praktiskt med ett 21:9-bildförhållande, men för tillfället är det opraktiskt.

Sony har tagit ett steg i rätt riktning med sin nya Xperia-serie. Xperia 10 är en excentrisk och skaplig mittenskiktstelefon, men en utdaterad SoC gör att vi för tillfället anser den vara för dyr.

Skärmen är dock ett nöje att använda och den är tillräckligt ljusstark för alla omgivningar. Den är också kontrastrik och har god färgprecision, så innehållet ser levande ut. Vår recensionsenhet är dessutom välgjord och vi välkomnar att den har en hörlursanslutning och förmågan att skala upp ljud till nästan högupplöst kvalitet.

Men dess interna lagring, RAM och SoC passar snarare än enhet för 2.500 kronor än en för 3.500 kronor. Vi var heller inte förtjusta i plasthöljet även om det är mer hållbart än ett i metall eller glas. Sammanfattningsvis är Sony Xperia 10 en skaplig smartphone, men den hade varit ännu mer tilltalande om den hade kostat 1.000 kronor mindre.

Sony Xperia 10 - 04/15/2019 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Design
85%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 86%
Mus
91%
Anslutningar
46 / 60 → 76%
Vikt
91%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
85%
Spelprestanda
40 / 63 → 64%
Programprestanda
52 / 70 → 74%
Temperatur
91%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
66 / 91 → 72%
Camera
65%
Medel
74%
84%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Sony Xperia 10 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-04-29 (Update: 2019-04-29)