Notebookcheck

Test: Xiaomi Mi 8 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 03/19/2019

Mimimi? Xiaomis flaggskepp Mi 8 från 2018 är verkligen inte utdaterad och har fortfarande mycket att ge till ett riktigt lågt pris. Dags att ta reda på hur den står sig mot aktuella lyxtelefoner.

Xiaomi Mi 8 (Mi Serie)
Minne
6144 MB 
Skärm
6.21 tum 18.75:9, 2248 x 1080 pixlar 402 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, AMOLED, HDR10, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 115 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: Ljud genom USB-C, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: accelerometer, gyroskop, närhetssensor, kompass, barometer, ansiktsigenkänning (infraröd), USB-C (OTG)
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1,800/​1,900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8/​B34/​B39), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B20/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.6 x 154.9 x 74.8
Batteri
12.9 Wh, 3400 mAh Litiumpolymer, Quick Charge
Operativsystem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/1.8, fasdetekterande autofokus (dual-pixel), OIS, dubbel LED-blixt, video @2160p/30fps (kamera 1); 12.0 MP, f/2.4, skärpedjup, teleobjektiv (kamera 2)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix Video @1080p/​30fps
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare på nedre kanten, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Nätadapter, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Silikon-skydd, USB-C till 3.5 mm-adapter, MIUI, Cleanup, Mi Drop, 24 Månader Garanti, A-GPS (L1/​L5), GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo (E1/​E5a), QZSS (L1/​L5); SAR: 0.701W/​kg (Huvud), 1.662W/​kg (Kropp);LED för notiser; LTE-Cat 16 (1.015 Mbit/s Nedladdning, 100 Mbit/s Uppladdning), fanless
Vikt
175 g, Strömförsörjning: 65 g
Pris
419 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8

Storleksjämförelse

158 mm 73 mm 9.9 mm 193 g157.5 mm 74.8 mm 8.2 mm 185 g154.9 mm 74.8 mm 7.6 mm 175 g154.9 mm 74.8 mm 7.6 mm 175 g147.7 mm 68.7 mm 8.5 mm 163 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼100% +33%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
629 (min: 621, max: 638) MBit/s ∼96% +28%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
624 (min: 593, max: 636) MBit/s ∼96% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 MBit/s ∼94% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 444, max: 499) MBit/s ∼75%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=367)
219 MBit/s ∼34% -55%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 MBit/s ∼100% +43%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼84% +21%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
484 (min: 382, max: 499) MBit/s ∼79% +13%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
474 (min: 241, max: 497) MBit/s ∼77% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
429 (min: 256, max: 448) MBit/s ∼70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=367)
210 MBit/s ∼34% -51%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø490 (444-499)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø429 (256-448)
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Översikt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Trafikplats
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Trafikplats
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Överfart
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Överfart
GPS Xiaomi Mi 8 – Översikt
GPS Xiaomi Mi 8 – Översikt
GPS Xiaomi Mi 8 – Trafikplats
GPS Xiaomi Mi 8 – Trafikplats
GPS Xiaomi Mi 8 – Översikt
GPS Xiaomi Mi 8 – Översikt

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Testkarta
Testkarta
Testkarta (detaljer)
Testkarta (detaljer)
ColorChecker-färger; referensfärgen i den nedre halvan av varje ruta.
ColorChecker-färger; referensfärgen i den nedre halvan av varje ruta.
432
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
424
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 449 cd/m² Medel: 434.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.08 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 430 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.09 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
140.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.257
Xiaomi Mi 8
AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.21
OnePlus 6T
Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Super AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2
Samsung Galaxy S9
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8
Sony Xperia XZ3
OLED, 2880x1440, 6
Screen
24%
10%
37%
-10%
Brightness middle
430
437
2%
429
0%
529
23%
543
26%
Brightness
434
442
2%
432
0%
527
21%
542
25%
Brightness Distribution
94
95
1%
88
-6%
96
2%
92
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.09
2.21
57%
3.39
33%
1.4
72%
6.6
-30%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.05
4.27
47%
5.25
35%
4
50%
11
-37%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.3
2.1
36%
3.3
-0%
1.6
52%
4.7
-42%
Gamma
2.257 97%
2.307 95%
2.238 98%
2.16 102%
1.835 120%
CCT
7026 93%
6353 102%
7135 91%
6358 102%
6817 95%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 238 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 238 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 238 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9727 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.7 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13371 Points ∼94%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13341 Points ∼93% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14299 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
6219 Points ∼43% -53%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
13194 Points ∼92% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (10876 - 14489, n=24)
13591 Points ∼95% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (870 - 21070, n=249)
4625 Points ∼32% -65%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8907 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8995 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8548 Points ∼95% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
8786 Points ∼98% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7934 Points ∼88% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (7754 - 9231, n=26)
8697 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=302)
4444 Points ∼49% -50%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2430 Points ∼66%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2384 Points ∼65% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2441 Points ∼66% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
3688 Points ∼100% +52%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2272 Points ∼62% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2272 - 2500, n=26)
2416 Points ∼66% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (437 - 4824, n=303)
1308 Points ∼35% -46%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7983 Points ∼94%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8487 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7360 Points ∼87% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
5291 Points ∼62% -34%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (7983 - 9868, n=27)
8057 Points ∼95% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2828 - 9868, n=312)
4797 Points ∼57% -40%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9689 Points ∼84%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
10590 Points ∼92% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8967 Points ∼78% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
5736 Points ∼50% -41%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
11474 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (7998 - 13211, n=25)
10131 Points ∼88% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2695 - 13531, n=481)
5226 Points ∼46% -46%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2215 Points ∼59%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3681 Points ∼98% +66%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2227 Points ∼59% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
2590 Points ∼69% +17%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3764 Points ∼100% +70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2185 - 3764, n=27)
3074 Points ∼82% +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4439, n=327)
1776 Points ∼47% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4471 Points ∼76%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5877 Points ∼100% +31%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4209 Points ∼72% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
3697 Points ∼63% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5810 Points ∼99% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4133 - 8206, n=27)
5424 Points ∼92% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=327)
1521 Points ∼26% -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3646 Points ∼70%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5189 Points ∼100% +42%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3512 Points ∼68% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
3376 Points ∼65% -7%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5184 Points ∼100% +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3512 - 5200, n=27)
4591 Points ∼88% +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 5913, n=330)
1416 Points ∼27% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2181 Points ∼59%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3374 Points ∼92% +55%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2145 Points ∼58% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
2650 Points ∼72% +22%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3672 Points ∼100% +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2110 - 3763, n=26)
3084 Points ∼84% +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=342)
1753 Points ∼48% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5328 Points ∼63%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8397 Points ∼100% +58%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5922 Points ∼71% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
4843 Points ∼58% -9%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8369 Points ∼100% +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (5228 - 8451, n=26)
7641 Points ∼91% +43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=342)
2096 Points ∼25% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4034 Points ∼62%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6310 Points ∼97% +56%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4232 Points ∼65% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
4091 Points ∼63% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
6517 Points ∼100% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4034 - 6568, n=26)
5740 Points ∼88% +42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 7856, n=343)
1779 Points ∼27% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2137 Points ∼58%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3537 Points ∼96% +66%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2118 Points ∼57% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
2486 Points ∼67% +16%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3703 Points ∼100% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2118 - 3703, n=26)
3209 Points ∼87% +50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4216, n=403)
1707 Points ∼46% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4010 Points ∼77%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5241 Points ∼100% +31%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3742 Points ∼71% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
3553 Points ∼68% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5092 Points ∼97% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3488 - 5246, n=26)
4912 Points ∼94% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6355, n=405)
1249 Points ∼24% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3356 Points ∼71%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4734 Points ∼100% +41%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3197 Points ∼68% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
3244 Points ∼69% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
4700 Points ∼99% +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3197 - 4734, n=26)
4379 Points ∼93% +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5509, n=413)
1195 Points ∼25% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2124 Points ∼59%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3483 Points ∼97% +64%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2176 Points ∼60% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
2600 Points ∼72% +22%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3603 Points ∼100% +70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2124 - 3668, n=26)
3113 Points ∼86% +47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4215, n=436)
1611 Points ∼45% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6243 Points ∼75%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8272 Points ∼100% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6554 Points ∼79% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
4569 Points ∼55% -27%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8014 Points ∼97% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (5637 - 8312, n=26)
7752 Points ∼94% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 9963, n=436)
1698 Points ∼21% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4363 Points ∼69%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6336 Points ∼100% +45%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4529 Points ∼71% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
3911 Points ∼62% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
6300 Points ∼99% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4363 - 6454, n=26)
5804 Points ∼92% +33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7166, n=444)
1455 Points ∼23% -67%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
27858 Points ∼76%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35022 Points ∼95% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
30765 Points ∼84% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
26851 Points ∼73% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
36794 Points ∼100% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (15614 - 37475, n=26)
33217 Points ∼90% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3958 - 37475, n=596)
13315 Points ∼36% -52%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
77203 Points ∼91%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
84998 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
77003 Points ∼91% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
48433 Points ∼57% -37%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
83927 Points ∼99% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (53794 - 85487, n=26)
80421 Points ∼95% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1152 - 162695, n=596)
19063 Points ∼22% -75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
55397 Points ∼85%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
64534 Points ∼99% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
57711 Points ∼88% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
41093 Points ∼63% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
65330 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (34855 - 65330, n=26)
60999 Points ∼93% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2915 - 77599, n=597)
15973 Points ∼24% -71%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
120 fps ∼79%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
152 fps ∼100% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
102 fps ∼67% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
144 fps ∼95% +20%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
152 fps ∼100% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (98 - 152, n=27)
142 fps ∼93% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.4 - 251, n=621)
33.1 fps ∼22% -72%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼96%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58 fps ∼93% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (58 - 89, n=26)
62.2 fps ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11 - 120, n=624)
26 fps ∼42% -57%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
67 fps ∼81%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼71% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
54 fps ∼65% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
73 fps ∼88% +9%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
83 fps ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (54 - 83, n=26)
72.7 fps ∼88% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 132, n=540)
18 fps ∼22% -73%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
56 fps ∼95%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
51 fps ∼86% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
45 fps ∼76% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
50 fps ∼85% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (33 - 75, n=26)
54.5 fps ∼92% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 115, n=545)
16.9 fps ∼29% -70%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
47 fps ∼80%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32 fps ∼54% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
46 fps ∼78% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
57 fps ∼97% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (32 - 61, n=27)
53.7 fps ∼91% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.3 - 88, n=402)
15.1 fps ∼26% -68%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
45 fps ∼85%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
53 fps ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
29 fps ∼55% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
24 fps ∼45% -47%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
31 fps ∼58% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (21 - 59, n=26)
45.8 fps ∼86% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.8 - 110, n=405)
14.6 fps ∼28% -68%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
14 fps ∼64% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (12 - 25, n=16)
19 fps ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.7 - 59, n=106)
9.39 fps ∼43% -57%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼89%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼89% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
14 fps ∼89% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (11 - 31, n=16)
15.7 fps ∼100% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 31, n=106)
6.48 fps ∼41% -54%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34 fps ∼97% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
21 fps ∼60% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (16 - 40, n=16)
29.6 fps ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.5 - 59, n=107)
13.8 fps ∼39% -61%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34 fps ∼92%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +9%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
37 fps ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (29 - 38, n=15)
35.1 fps ∼95% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.75 - 63, n=106)
15.3 fps ∼41% -55%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
26 fps ∼74%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100% +35%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
25 fps ∼71% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
28 fps ∼80% +8%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
35 fps ∼100% +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (25 - 35, n=26)
33.4 fps ∼95% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.6 - 54, n=331)
10.3 fps ∼29% -60%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
28 fps ∼90%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31 fps ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
24 fps ∼77% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
14 fps ∼45% -50%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
19 fps ∼61% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (13 - 37, n=26)
28 fps ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 58, n=335)
9.31 fps ∼30% -67%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
294488 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
288062 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
243861 Points ∼83%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
292268 Points ∼99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (246366 - 299878, n=26)
277061 Points ∼94%
Average of class Smartphone
  (41483 - 374820, n=224)
124915 Points ∼42%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
234421 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
228939 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
232931 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
217950 Points ∼93% -7%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
226853 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (162183 - 242953, n=23)
225534 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23275 - 274007, n=437)
81300 Points ∼35% -65%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1292 Points ∼92%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1398 Points ∼100% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1288 Points ∼92% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
1099 Points ∼79% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
1390 Points ∼99% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (1009 - 1613, n=25)
1345 Points ∼96% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=554)
720 Points ∼52% -44%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7895 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7969 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7965 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
6373 Points ∼80% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7989 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (5846 - 8001, n=25)
7792 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=554)
1840 Points ∼23% -77%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3261 Points ∼75%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4344 Points ∼100% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3521 Points ∼81% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
2669 Points ∼61% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2317 Points ∼53% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2193 - 5296, n=25)
3632 Points ∼84% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 6283, n=554)
1351 Points ∼31% -59%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6620 Points ∼81%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8156 Points ∼100% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6556 Points ∼80% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
6234 Points ∼76% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8135 Points ∼100% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4417 - 8613, n=25)
7632 Points ∼94% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=554)
2702 Points ∼33% -59%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3852 Points ∼86%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4458 Points ∼100% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3923 Points ∼88% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
3285 Points ∼74% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3804 Points ∼85% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3291 - 4693, n=25)
4104 Points ∼92% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=558)
1341 Points ∼30% -65%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
87.883 Points ∼100% +16%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
86.123 Points ∼98% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
80.876 Points ∼92% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
75.483 Points ∼86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (0 - 90.9, n=27)
74.3 Points ∼85% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
67.721 Points ∼77% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 273, n=470)
37.8 Points ∼43% -50%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
16982 Points ∼100% +13%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
16824 Points ∼99% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
15233 Points ∼90% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=27)
15104 Points ∼89% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
15086 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
14617 Points ∼86% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (4865 - 43280, n=614)
5907 Points ∼35% -61%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=633)
11115 ms * ∼100% -294%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=27)
2924 ms * ∼26% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
2818 ms * ∼25%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
2316.8 ms * ∼21% +18%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
2295 ms * ∼21% +19%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
2281.6 ms * ∼21% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2077.8 ms * ∼19% +26%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
98 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=17)
85 Points ∼87% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
83 Points ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone (24 - 161, n=90)
64.3 Points ∼66% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S9
63 Points ∼64% -24%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
260 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
251 Points ∼97% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
245 Points ∼94%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
238 Points ∼92% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (245 - 291, n=23)
235 Points ∼90% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
163 Points ∼63% -33%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 362, n=312)
117 Points ∼45% -52%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi 8OnePlus 6TXiaomi Mi 8 Explorer EditionSamsung Galaxy S9Sony Xperia XZ3Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
3%
2%
6%
-1%
81%
-51%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
30.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.5 (51.3 - 72.4, n=11)
47.4 (9.5 - 87.1, n=369)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
34.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.8 (73.2 - 85.4, n=11)
65.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=369)
Random Write 4KB
21
22
5%
22.65
8%
23.07
10%
22.22
6%
87.5 (19.5 - 250, n=25)
317%
18.5 (0.14 - 250, n=664)
-12%
Random Read 4KB
136.3
138.5
2%
135.21
-1%
131
-4%
135.67
0%
139 (117 - 158, n=25)
2%
41.9 (1.59 - 174, n=664)
-69%
Sequential Write 256KB
207.8
204.4
-2%
205.23
-1%
206.94
0%
196.14
-6%
200 (183 - 212, n=25)
-4%
87 (2.99 - 388, n=664)
-58%
Sequential Read 256KB
693.2
735.3
6%
691.65
0%
815.43
18%
680.98
-2%
760 (427 - 912, n=25)
10%
244 (12.1 - 912, n=664)
-65%
Arena of Valor
0102030405060Tooltip
; min; 1.27.1.2: Ø59.8 (56-60)
; high HD; 1.27.1.2: Ø59.8 (57-60)
Asphalt 9
0102030Tooltip
; High Quality; 1.4.1a: Ø29.5 (28-30)
; Standard / low; 1.4.1a: Ø29.3 (27-30)
Hög belastning
 41.7 °C38.4 °C36.7 °C 
 42.5 °C38.9 °C37.4 °C 
 41.6 °C38.4 °C36.7 °C 
Max: 42.5 °C
Medel: 39.1 °C
32.6 °C36 °C38.9 °C
33.5 °C37.4 °C39.7 °C
34.1 °C37.7 °C39.3 °C
Max: 39.7 °C
Medel: 36.6 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  42.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.737.72542.136.43130.529.14033.632.75038.134.86330.431.88025.224.810025.524.9125262916021.538.920020.144.625018.947.831517.85440018.35850019.162.663019.565.280017.366.5100015.767.2125014.369.6160015.871200014.874.9250015.470.7315014.766.8400014.361.3500014.768.4630014.870.7800014.267.5100001462.21250014.554.91600014.347.5SPL68.82881.2N22.2147.9median 15.7median 62.6Delta2.310.230.32938.131.328.52831.428.536.634.224.628.624.126.520.523.11927.316.939.919.151.416.652.413.9551559.514.659.112.357.411.858.611.863.811.968.611.469.511.27011.573.311.370.510.968.710.568.610.76610.665.210.566.410.655.710.638.964.357.22480.516.810.40.545.3median 11.8median 59.52.28.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 8OnePlus 6T
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 6T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 1.5 / 2.2 / 2.6 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 6.1 / 10.9 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi 8
3400 mAh
OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ3
3300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
35%
-14%
52%
40%
24%
33%
Idle Minimum *
1.5
0.7
53%
1.8
-20%
0.65
57%
0.8
47%
0.862 (0.42 - 1.8, n=26)
43%
0.884 (0.2 - 3.4, n=700)
41%
Idle Average *
2.2
1.1
50%
2.9
-32%
0.81
63%
1.2
45%
1.728 (0.67 - 2.9, n=26)
21%
1.738 (0.6 - 6.2, n=699)
21%
Idle Maximum *
2.6
2.1
19%
3.5
-35%
0.92
65%
1.5
42%
2.07 (0.87 - 3.5, n=26)
20%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=700)
22%
Load Average *
6.1
4.2
31%
4.8
21%
4.76
22%
4.8
21%
4.87 (3.56 - 7.41, n=26)
20%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=694)
33%
Load Maximum *
10.9
8.3
24%
11.2
-3%
5.16
53%
6.2
43%
9.27 (6.2 - 12.3, n=26)
15%
5.84 (1.2 - 14.2, n=694)
46%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
27tim 14min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12tim 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14tim 57min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
3tim 35min
Xiaomi Mi 8
3400 mAh
OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ3
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
15%
-7%
-30%
-31%
Reader / Idle
1634
1936
18%
1401
-14%
1182
-28%
1270
-22%
H.264
897
903
1%
921
3%
609
-32%
420
-53%
WiFi v1.3
736
865
18%
694
-6%
474
-36%
419
-43%
Load
215
261
21%
191
-11%
164
-24%
202
-6%

För

+ snyggt och robust hölje
+ skaplig batteritid
+ rikligt med prestanda
+ lågt pris
+ kameror av hög kvalitet
+ HDR-skärm

Emot

- många appar som inte kan avinstalleras
- oprecis GPS
- tveksam garantisituation
- jämförelsevis hög energiförbrukning
Recenseras: Xiaomi Mi 8. Recensionsex från notebooksbilliger.de
Recenseras: Xiaomi Mi 8. Recensionsex från notebooksbilliger.de

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

När vi tidigare recenserade Mi 8 Explorer Edition tyckte vi den var ett gyllene exempel på en bra enhet i prisskiktet straxt under 4.000 kronor och detta gäller även Mi 8. Den är inte lika enastående och saknar en del bling (som en genomskinlig baksidespanel eller en fingeravtrycksläsare som är inbyggd i skärmen) men den erbjuder fortfarande väletablerade mittenskiktskomponenter till ett rimligt pris. Till och med många månader efter att telefonen släppts officiellt i väst så är den mycket billigare än många av sina konkurrenter, inklusive den självutnämnda flaggskeppsdödaren OnePlus 6T.

Den kanske inte når upp till de högsta förväntningarna och den högsta standarden - dess GPS är inte i närheten tillräckligt precis, WiFi-modemet är för långsamt och energiförbrukningen är för hög. Men vid användning till vardags känns den som en lyxig smartphone med ett rejält hölje, en kraftfull SoC, en HDR-kapabel AMOLED-skärm och skapliga inmatningsenheter.

Tack vare ett superbt förhållande mellan pris och prestanda håller Xiaomi Mi 8 vad den lovar.

Det finns egentligen bara två problem. För det första, tillverkarens garanti (eller brist på sådan) och faktum att man som köpare är begränsad till en eventuell återförsäljargaranti. För det andra, faktum att även om operativsystemet och mjukvaran den här gången har översatts riktigt bra så är mängden bloatware som inte går att avinstallera häpnadsväckande. Plus att om du gräver djupare i inställningarna blir det snabbt... låt oss säga unikt.

Totalt sätt förtjänar Xiaomi Mi 8 fortfarande vårt fulla stöd, inte bara för hur mycket man får ut per krona. Vi kan inte vänta på att få prova Xiaomi Mi 9, som bör dyka upp på vår tröskel inom ett par veckor.

Xiaomi Mi 8 - 03/11/2019 v6
Florian Schmitt

Design
87%
Tangentbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Mus
94%
Anslutningar
49 / 60 → 81%
Vikt
90%
Batteri
95%
Skärm
86%
Spelprestanda
61 / 63 → 97%
Programprestanda
73 / 70 → 100%
Temperatur
87%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 75%
Camera
80%
Medel
80%
88%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Mi 8 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Florian Schmitt, 2019-03-19 (Update: 2019-03-19)