Notebookcheck

Test: Sony Xperia 10 Plus Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 04/28/2019

Sonys nästa drag. Med sin nya smartphonedesign har denna tillverkare från fjärran östern äntligen lyckats ta det som kunderna verkligen önskat i beaktande utan att behöva ge upp sin egen identitet. Läs vidare i vår recension för att få reda på hur Xperia 10 Plus med sin 21:9-skärm står sig mot konkurrensen.

Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Xperia Serie)
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 509
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
6.5 tum 21:9, 2520 x 1080 pixlar 422 PPI, Kapacitiv, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD (upp till 512GB, FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, närhetssensor, kompass
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850/900/1800/1900), 3G UMTS/HSPA+ (1/2/5/8), 4G LTE (1/2/3/5/7/8/20/28/32/38), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.3 x 167 x 73
Batteri
3000 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix 12+8MP Exmor RS-bildsensor, 1/2,8”+1/4", 1.25+1.12 μm, 76,3+44,6°, f/1.75+f/2.4
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 1/4", 1,12 µm, 84°, f/2.0
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2 högtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, USB-nätadapter, USB typ C-kabel, stereo-headset, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värde (Huvud): 0.72 W/kg, SAR-värde (Kropp): 1,49 W/kg, fanless
Vikt
180 g, Strömförsörjning: 56 g
Pris
430 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Sony Xperia 10 Plus

Storleksjämförelse

167 mm 73 mm 8.3 mm 180 g162.5 mm 77 mm 7.8 mm 183 g155.5 mm 75.2 mm 8.8 mm 182 g156.5 mm 76.5 mm 6.75 mm 156 g154.8 mm 75.8 mm 8 mm 180 g153 mm 75.7 mm 7.9 mm 155 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
675 (min: 630, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100% +113%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
612 (min: 580, max: 635) MBit/s ∼91% +93%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
584 (min: 557, max: 605) MBit/s ∼87% +84%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
317 (min: 163, max: 343) MBit/s ∼47%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 273, max: 341) MBit/s ∼46% -2%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
232 MBit/s ∼34% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=409)
222 MBit/s ∼33% -30%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
655 (min: 619, max: 692) MBit/s ∼100% +328%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 (min: 598, max: 665) MBit/s ∼99% +323%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
300 (min: 169, max: 367) MBit/s ∼46% +96%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
285 (min: 249, max: 304) MBit/s ∼44% +86%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
237 MBit/s ∼36% +55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=409)
212 MBit/s ∼32% +39%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
153 (min: 133, max: 180) MBit/s ∼23%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø311 (163-343)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø153 (133-180)
GNSS - Sony Xperia 10 Plus
GNSS - Sony Xperia 10 Plus
GNSS - Sony Xperia 10 Plus
GNSS - Sony Xperia 10 Plus
GNSS - Sony Xperia 10 Plus
GNSS - Sony Xperia 10 Plus
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Sony Xperia 10 Plus - Testkarta
Sony Xperia 10 Plus - Testkarta (Detaljer)
589
cd/m²
592
cd/m²
570
cd/m²
570
cd/m²
572
cd/m²
580
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
572
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 592 cd/m² Medel: 579.7 cd/m² Minimum: 5.99 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 572 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1430:1 (Svärta: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 7.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
95.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
IPS, 2520x1080, 6.5
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
OLED, 2220x1080, 6.3
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6
Nokia 8.1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
2246x1080, 6.2
Screen
30%
11%
-6%
-2%
4%
Brightness middle
572
553
-3%
489
-15%
446
-22%
567
-1%
601
5%
Brightness
580
553
-5%
486
-16%
451
-22%
547
-6%
565
-3%
Brightness Distribution
96
96
0%
93
-3%
93
-3%
92
-4%
90
-6%
Black Level *
0.4
0.34
15%
0.61
-53%
0.6
-50%
Contrast
1430
1438
1%
930
-35%
1002
-30%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
2.2
51%
3.8
16%
6.58
-46%
4.39
2%
3.4
24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
12.2
5.1
58%
7.1
42%
11.94
2%
7.28
40%
6.1
50%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.9
1.7
78%
4.4
44%
3.6
54%
4.9
38%
4.4
44%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.06 107%
2.22 99%
2.199 100%
2.248 98%
2.25 98%
CCT
8726 74%
6434 101%
7213 90%
7116 91%
7642 85%
7493 87%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2358 Hz ≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9429 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.8 ms rise
↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.2 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4278 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5542 Points ∼39% +30%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14369 Points ∼100% +236%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4501 Points ∼31% +5%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6813 Points ∼47% +59%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14160 Points ∼99% +231%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13496 Points ∼94% +215%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (4278 - 5041, n=11)
4505 Points ∼31% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=307)
4559 Points ∼32% +7%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4804 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5826 Points ∼63% +21%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9182 Points ∼100% +91%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4941 Points ∼54% +3%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5856 Points ∼64% +22%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9014 Points ∼98% +88%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8849 Points ∼96% +84%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (4781 - 5426, n=11)
4960 Points ∼54% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=362)
4549 Points ∼50% -5%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1346 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1601 Points ∼65% +19%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2468 Points ∼100% +83%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1330 Points ∼54% -1%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1799 Points ∼73% +34%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2457 Points ∼100% +83%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2425 Points ∼98% +80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (1323 - 1506, n=11)
1351 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=364)
1354 Points ∼55% +1%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6018 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5789 Points ∼69% -4%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8101 Points ∼96% +35%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5640 Points ∼67% -6%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6887 Points ∼82% +14%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8430 Points ∼100% +40%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8365 Points ∼99% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (5611 - 6277, n=11)
5291 Points ∼63% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=357)
4997 Points ∼59% -17%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7181 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
6338 Points ∼60% -12%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9664 Points ∼91% +35%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6457 Points ∼61% -10%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8309 Points ∼79% +16%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
10571 Points ∼100% +47%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9971 Points ∼94% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (6040 - 7618, n=10)
6617 Points ∼63% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=525)
5466 Points ∼52% -24%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2282 Points ∼94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
 
2282 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1779 - 15735, n=44)
2435 Points ∼100% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
809 Points ∼33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
 
809 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (209 - 14536, n=44)
2471 Points ∼100% +205%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
944 Points ∼44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
 
944 Points ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (260 - 14786, n=47)
2125 Points ∼100% +125%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2345 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2774 Points ∼79% +18%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2257 Points ∼64% -4%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2384 Points ∼68% +2%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2534 Points ∼72% +8%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3515 Points ∼100% +50%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3512 Points ∼100% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (2258 - 2644, n=10)
2376 Points ∼68% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=372)
1830 Points ∼52% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
862 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1268 Points ∼22% +47%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4468 Points ∼78% +418%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
865 Points ∼15% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1845 Points ∼32% +114%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5747 Points ∼100% +567%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5641 Points ∼98% +554%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (645 - 872, n=10)
840 Points ∼15% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=372)
1598 Points ∼28% +85%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1003 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1433 Points ∼28% +43%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3669 Points ∼73% +266%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1008 Points ∼20% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1964 Points ∼39% +96%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5036 Points ∼100% +402%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4971 Points ∼99% +396%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (765 - 1016, n=10)
980 Points ∼19% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=375)
1484 Points ∼29% +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2352 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2645 Points ∼76% +12%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2832 Points ∼81% +20%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2384 Points ∼68% +1%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2516 Points ∼72% +7%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3486 Points ∼100% +48%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3148 Points ∼90% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (2343 - 2683, n=10)
2396 Points ∼69% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=386)
1805 Points ∼52% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1397 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1757 Points ∼21% +26%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6898 Points ∼83% +394%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1400 Points ∼17% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2855 Points ∼34% +104%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8352 Points ∼100% +498%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8291 Points ∼99% +493%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (1358 - 1406, n=10)
1396 Points ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=386)
2194 Points ∼26% +57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1536 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1898 Points ∼30% +24%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5230 Points ∼82% +240%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1541 Points ∼24% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2772 Points ∼43% +80%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6375 Points ∼100% +315%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6083 Points ∼95% +296%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (1525 - 1554, n=10)
1538 Points ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=387)
1860 Points ∼29% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2351 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2073 Points ∼60% -12%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2528 Points ∼73% +8%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2327 Points ∼67% -1%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2514 Points ∼72% +7%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3473 Points ∼100% +48%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3399 Points ∼98% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (2251 - 2634, n=10)
2360 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=448)
1760 Points ∼51% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
808 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1185 Points ∼23% +47%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4746 Points ∼92% +487%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
815 Points ∼16% +1%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1702 Points ∼33% +111%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5158 Points ∼100% +538%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5144 Points ∼100% +537%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (797 - 818, n=10)
812 Points ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=450)
1324 Points ∼26% +64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
946 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1354 Points ∼29% +43%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3972 Points ∼85% +320%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
953 Points ∼20% +1%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1834 Points ∼39% +94%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4656 Points ∼100% +392%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4617 Points ∼99% +388%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (946 - 962, n=11)
864 Points ∼19% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=458)
1262 Points ∼27% +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2349 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2741 Points ∼79% +17%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2720 Points ∼78% +16%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2337 Points ∼67% -1%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2467 Points ∼71% +5%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3482 Points ∼100% +48%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3392 Points ∼97% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (1349 - 2626, n=10)
2274 Points ∼65% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=480)
1667 Points ∼48% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1327 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1918 Points ∼23% +45%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8261 Points ∼100% +523%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1333 Points ∼16% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼33% +108%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8236 Points ∼100% +521%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8179 Points ∼99% +516%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (1313 - 1353, n=10)
1332 Points ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=480)
1801 Points ∼22% +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1469 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2054 Points ∼33% +40%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5687 Points ∼90% +287%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1474 Points ∼23% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2691 Points ∼43% +83%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6293 Points ∼100% +328%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6252 Points ∼99% +326%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (1458 - 1493, n=10)
1476 Points ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=488)
1541 Points ∼24% +5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
18523 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34928 Points ∼99%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16939 Points ∼48%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14820 Points ∼42%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35290 Points ∼100%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34665 Points ∼98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (0 - 19365, n=11)
15577 Points ∼44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=640)
13636 Points ∼39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
29065 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
82125 Points ∼97%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
20908 Points ∼25%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
39655 Points ∼47%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
84681 Points ∼100%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
80166 Points ∼95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (0 - 20953, n=11)
18924 Points ∼22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11427 - 162695, n=640)
19988 Points ∼24%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
25783 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
63159 Points ∼98%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19873 Points ∼31%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
28895 Points ∼45%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
64592 Points ∼100%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
62063 Points ∼96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (0 - 20404, n=11)
18061 Points ∼28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11565 - 83518, n=641)
16573 Points ∼26%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
46 fps ∼31% +31%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
150 fps ∼100% +329%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
36 fps ∼24% +3%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
65 fps ∼43% +86%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
150 fps ∼100% +329%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
149 fps ∼99% +326%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (35 - 36, n=11)
35.6 fps ∼24% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=669)
35 fps ∼23% 0%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
30 fps ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
50 fps ∼83% +67%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +100%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼58% +17%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
57 fps ∼95% +90%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +100%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (30 - 40, n=11)
34.5 fps ∼58% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=672)
26.9 fps ∼45% -10%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
23 fps ∼28% +44%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
71 fps ∼87% +344%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼20% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
32 fps ∼39% +100%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
82 fps ∼100% +413%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
80 fps ∼98% +400%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (16 - 16, n=11)
16 fps ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=588)
19.3 fps ∼24% +21%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
13 fps ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
21 fps ∼36% +62%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58 fps ∼98% +346%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps ∼25% +15%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
31 fps ∼53% +138%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +354%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
55 fps ∼93% +323%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (13 - 18, n=11)
15 fps ∼25% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=593)
17.8 fps ∼30% +37%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
15 fps ∼25% +50%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼58% +250%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼17% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
23 fps ∼38% +130%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +500%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼98% +490%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (9.8 - 10, n=11)
9.98 fps ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=449)
15.9 fps ∼27% +59%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
8.4 fps ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
14 fps ∼26% +67%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
54 fps ∼100% +543%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
9.8 fps ∼18% +17%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
22 fps ∼41% +162%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
53 fps ∼98% +531%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
51 fps ∼94% +507%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (8.4 - 12, n=11)
9.81 fps ∼18% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=452)
15.2 fps ∼28% +81%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
3.2 fps ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
3 fps ∼13% -6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼96% +588%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8.2 fps ∼36% +156%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
23 fps ∼100% +619%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (2 - 4.4, n=8)
3.39 fps ∼15% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=152)
8.97 fps ∼39% +180%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.2 fps ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
4.8 fps ∼34% +118%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼100% +536%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5 fps ∼36% +127%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼100% +536%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (2.2 - 2.3, n=8)
2.21 fps ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=152)
6.2 fps ∼44% +182%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4.9 fps ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
7.5 fps ∼21% +53%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31 fps ∼86% +533%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼36% +165%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
36 fps ∼100% +635%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (4.9 - 6.9, n=8)
5.61 fps ∼16% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=154)
13.5 fps ∼38% +176%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.1 fps ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.6 fps ∼23% +41%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32 fps ∼86% +425%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14 fps ∼38% +130%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +507%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (5.4 - 6.1, n=8)
5.93 fps ∼16% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=153)
14.8 fps ∼40% +143%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
9.1 fps ∼26% +44%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100% +456%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼18% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼37% +106%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100% +456%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100% +456%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (6.3 - 6.3, n=11)
6.3 fps ∼18% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=378)
10.7 fps ∼31% +70%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.1 fps ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.3 fps ∼25% +63%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +547%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼18% +18%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼36% +135%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31 fps ∼94% +508%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31 fps ∼94% +508%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (5.1 - 7.4, n=11)
6.01 fps ∼18% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=382)
9.65 fps ∼29% +89%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
117574 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
140878 Points ∼52% +20%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
263165 Points ∼97% +124%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
115656 Points ∼42% -2%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
169262 Points ∼62% +44%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
272546 Points ∼100% +132%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
266374 Points ∼98% +127%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (115565 - 138661, n=11)
118863 Points ∼44% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=270)
130378 Points ∼48% +11%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1046 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1105 Points ∼69% +6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1296 Points ∼80% +24%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1052 Points ∼65% +1%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1077 Points ∼67% +3%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1613 Points ∼100% +54%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1606 Points ∼100% +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (1018 - 1088, n=9)
1054 Points ∼65% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=600)
741 Points ∼46% -29%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1611 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2332 Points ∼29% +45%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7945 Points ∼100% +393%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1625 Points ∼20% +1%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
3086 Points ∼39% +92%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7860 Points ∼99% +388%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7777 Points ∼98% +383%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (1590 - 1625, n=9)
1605 Points ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=600)
1942 Points ∼24% +21%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1236 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2393 Points ∼61% +94%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3239 Points ∼83% +162%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2208 Points ∼56% +79%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2947 Points ∼75% +138%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3924 Points ∼100% +217%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3762 Points ∼96% +204%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (1236 - 2492, n=9)
1951 Points ∼50% +58%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=600)
1446 Points ∼37% +17%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4342 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5063 Points ∼63% +17%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6506 Points ∼81% +50%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4628 Points ∼57% +7%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5681 Points ∼70% +31%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8081 Points ∼100% +86%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8023 Points ∼99% +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (4320 - 5348, n=9)
4566 Points ∼57% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=600)
2852 Points ∼35% -34%
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1734 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2364 Points ∼53% +36%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3838 Points ∼86% +121%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2044 Points ∼46% +18%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2731 Points ∼61% +57%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4478 Points ∼100% +158%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4406 Points ∼98% +154%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (1734 - 2156, n=9)
1963 Points ∼44% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=604)
1418 Points ∼32% -18%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (14.6 - 108, n=79)
30.7 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
26 Points ∼85% 0%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
25.96 Points ∼85%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=71)
34.6 runs/min ∼100% +26%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
27.4 runs/min ∼79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
27.4 runs/min ∼79% 0%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
72 Points ∼100% +33%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=132)
63.5 Points ∼88% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
59 Points ∼82% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (54 - 61, n=8)
55.5 Points ∼77% +3%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
55 Points ∼76% +2%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
54 Points ∼75%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68, AI Boost ON)
16728 Points ∼100% +105%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68)
16635 Points ∼99% +104%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
14514 Points ∼87% +78%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
12717 Points ∼76% +56%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
10145 Points ∼61% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (8163 - 9746, n=11)
8657 Points ∼52% +6%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
8519 Points ∼51% +4%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
8163 Points ∼49%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=661)
6268 Points ∼37% -23%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=681)
10805 ms * ∼100% -128%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
4820 ms * ∼45% -2%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
4739 ms * ∼44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4105 - 4820, n=11)
4653 ms * ∼43% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
3841.8 (min: 1) ms * ∼36% +19%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
3034.9 ms * ∼28% +36%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
2713.6 ms * ∼25% +43%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68, AI Boost ON)
2277 ms * ∼21% +52%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68)
2264 ms * ∼21% +52%

* ... smaller is better

Sony Xperia 10 PlusSamsung Galaxy A9 2018Xiaomi Pocophone F1Motorola Moto Z3 PlayNokia 8.1Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KLAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
18%
30%
62%
-11%
117%
-3%
-21%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
58.44 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
65.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
62.7
7%
58.27 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
66.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
14%
56.3 (58.4 - 74.7, n=100)
-4%
48.6 (9.5 - 87.1, n=403)
-17%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
83.7
0%
84.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
85.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
74.3 (76.1 - 87.2, n=100)
-11%
66.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=403)
-21%
Random Write 4KB
16.77
19.79
18%
17.81
6%
84.1
401%
7.3
-56%
96.6
476%
24.3 (3.4 - 88.2, n=109)
45%
20.1 (0.14 - 250, n=711)
20%
Random Read 4KB
77.67
116.76
50%
101.01
30%
60.6
-22%
69.9
-10%
124.05
60%
54.3 (11.4 - 149, n=109)
-30%
44.8 (1.59 - 175, n=711)
-42%
Sequential Write 256KB
205.19
194.65
-5%
155.57
-24%
182.5
-11%
203.8
-1%
193.18
-6%
171 (40 - 246, n=109)
-17%
92.1 (2.99 - 503, n=711)
-55%
Sequential Read 256KB
280.34
426.63
52%
705.38
152%
271.7
-3%
279.3
0%
721
157%
272 (95.6 - 704, n=109)
-3%
258 (12.1 - 1468, n=711)
-8%
PUBG Compare
0102030Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø24.7 (9-26)
; Balanced: Ø24.8 (10-26)
Arena of Valor
010203040Tooltip
; min: Ø32.2 (31-33)
; high HD: Ø31.1 (28-32)
Hög belastning
 40.8 °C37.5 °C31.6 °C 
 40.4 °C36.8 °C30.7 °C 
 36.9 °C34 °C30.8 °C 
Max: 40.8 °C
Medel: 35.5 °C
30.9 °C34.1 °C37.3 °C
29.9 °C32.3 °C38 °C
28.6 °C31.6 °C37.1 °C
Max: 38 °C
Medel: 33.3 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  29.7 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.235.52527.827.73124.127.24024.925.15033.337.86323.831.48026.224.810026.228.612517.423.416017.236.620017.340.225016.446.931516.253.740015.756.150014.659.663016.365.480013.470100013.870.5125014.373.2160013.872.8200014.374.6250014.676.4315013.779.7400014.579.4500014.476.5630014.374.1800014.6711000014.669.31250014.568.91600014.862.4SPL26.787.2N0.864.9median 14.6median 69.3Delta1.411.229.527.126.929.829.328.129.829.433.731.42324.323.125.524.223.516.92517.131.216.841.617.746.31549.414.956.217.555.414.854.414.258.213.960.314.66113.459.312.855.913.362.413.265.915.363.512.364.912.157.511.856.211.66011.656.511.547.525.954.273.40.7930.7median 14.2median 56.21.96.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSony Xperia 10 PlusMotorola Moto Z3 Play
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Motorola Moto Z3 Play audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.14 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.68 / 2.12 / 2.17 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.82 / 6.44 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
3800 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
3000 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-10%
-7%
-17%
12%
-53%
-20%
-0%
Idle Minimum *
0.68
1.06
-56%
0.65
4%
1.3
-91%
0.8
-18%
0.97
-43%
0.965 (0.6 - 1.75, n=11)
-42%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=743)
-29%
Idle Average *
2.12
1.94
8%
1.97
7%
2
6%
1.5
29%
2.52
-19%
2.21 (1.4 - 4.48, n=11)
-4%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=742)
18%
Idle Maximum *
2.17
1.98
9%
2.01
7%
2.7
-24%
1.8
17%
2.62
-21%
2.57 (2 - 4.5, n=11)
-18%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=743)
7%
Load Average *
3.82
3.56
7%
4.29
-12%
3.7
3%
3.2
16%
7.41
-94%
4.56 (3.65 - 7.92, n=11)
-19%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=737)
-6%
Load Maximum *
6.44
7.49
-16%
9.05
-41%
5.1
21%
5.4
16%
12.22
-90%
7.41 (5.1 - 13.6, n=11)
-15%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=737)
9%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
23tim 20min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10tim 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11tim 41min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 34min
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
3800 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
3000 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
28%
38%
1%
30%
2%
Reader / Idle
1400
1780
27%
2088
49%
1245
-11%
1682
20%
H.264
701
1005
43%
936
34%
648
-8%
857
22%
WiFi v1.3
635
689
9%
808
27%
595
-6%
738
16%
645
2%
Load
154
205
33%
220
43%
199
29%
246
60%

För

+ bra känsla och konstruktion
+ det går att komma åt nano-SIM och microSD-kort utan verktyg
+ stor skärm i en telefon med rimlig storlek
+ kan ha dubbla SIM-kort och lagring samtidigt
+ Bluetooth 5.0 och USB Typ C-anslutning

Emot

- det virtuella tangentbordet är antingen för smalt eller för brett
- hårdvaran presterar en aning under genomsnittet
- endast USB 2.0-standard

Omdöme - Bra smartphone från Sony med en del svagheter

Recenseras: Sony Xperia 10 Plus. Recensionsex från:
Recenseras: Sony Xperia 10 Plus. Recensionsex från:

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Sony Xperia 10 Plus lyckades bemästra vardagliga uppgifter utan problem i vår recension. Kameran lämpar sig perfekt för en bild då och då och designen är en helt annan värld jämfört med Sonys äldre fyrkantiga designer. När man håller den i handen blir det uppenbart att denna enhet på 6.5 tum ändå passar små händer tack vare sitt 21:9-bildförhållande. Utöver det uppskattade vi att kunna använda två nano SIM-kort och ett microSD-kort samtidigt samt det faktum att inget verktyg krävdes för att byta ut dessa.

Sony Xperia 10 Plus imponerar med sin breda skärm och många appar kan dra nytta av den extra ytan. Den har riktigt bra design och kvalitet - det är bara prestandan som är en besvikelse då den hamnar en aning efter konkurrenterna på den punkten.

Men en del användare kommer kanske inte uppskatta det ovanliga bildförhållandet som får det virtuella tangentbordet att vara för litet i porträttläge och för brett i landskapsläge. Även om en del appar och spel anpassar sig till det bredare formatet så får man leva med svarta kanter i appar som inte stödjer det. Hårdvaruspecifikationerna ligger i mittenskiktet; men prestandan ligger närmare botten jämfört med konkurrenterna i den här klassen. Trots detta är det en riktigt tilltalande telefon som inte behöver gömma sig på grund av sitt utseende.

Sony Xperia 10 Plus - 04/15/2019 v6
Mike Wobker

Design
86%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 86%
Mus
91%
Anslutningar
43 / 60 → 71%
Vikt
90%
Batteri
93%
Skärm
85%
Spelprestanda
46 / 63 → 72%
Programprestanda
60 / 70 → 85%
Temperatur
90%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
66 / 91 → 72%
Camera
66%
Medel
75%
84%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Sony Xperia 10 Plus Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Mike Wobker, 2019-04-28 (Update: 2019-04-29)