Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: LG Gram 14Z980 (i5-8250U) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 83 %
Mitt på batteriet: 333.8 cd/m²
Kontrast: 835:1 (Svärta: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.54 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.36
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94.7% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 LG Philips LP140WF7-SPG1, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 ID: AUO 282B B133ZAN Dell: 90NTH, IPS, 13.30, 3840x2160 | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Tianma XM, IPS, 13.90, 3000x2000 | HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000 LGD0588, IPS, 13.30, 3840x2160 | Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T AU Optronics B140HAN03.2, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB B139HAN03_0, IPS, 13.90, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 2% | 9% | -3% | -0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.7 | 64.7 0% | 65.9 2% | 71.9 11% | 64.5 0% | 64.3 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 94.3 | 93.1 -1% | 95.2 1% | 98.1 4% | 87.9 -7% | 94.6 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66 | 65.3 -1% | 67.6 2% | 73.1 11% | 64.4 -2% | 66.2 0% |
| Response Times | -39% | 3% | -24% | -12% | -2% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36.8 ? | 58 ? -58% | 40.4 ? -10% | 51.6 ? -40% | 44 ? -20% | 40.8 ? -11% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 36 ? -20% | 25.6 ? 15% | 32.4 ? -8% | 31 ? -3% | 27.6 ? 8% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | 6% | 12% | 20% | -14% | -20% | |
| Brightness middle | 333.8 | 404 21% | 442.7 33% | 329.8 -1% | 330 -1% | 316 -5% |
| Brightness | 307 | 389 27% | 428 39% | 318 4% | 285 -7% | 291 -5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 85 2% | 84 1% | 74 -11% | 78 -6% | 83 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.37 7% | 0.31 22% | 0.25 37% | 0.23 42% | 0.36 10% |
| Contrast | 835 | 1092 31% | 1428 71% | 1319 58% | 1435 72% | 878 5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.54 | 3.72 -5% | 2.24 37% | 2.37 33% | 5.77 -63% | 5.9 -67% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.8 | 7.38 -27% | 7.19 -24% | 4.08 30% | 10.46 -80% | 12.9 -122% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.36 | 2.06 13% | 1.11 53% | 3.18 -35% | 1.3 45% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 4.44 6% | 9.7 -106% | 2.8 40% | 7.61 -62% | 8.6 -83% |
| Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.34 94% | 1.42 155% | 2.145 103% | 2.46 89% | 2.1 105% |
| CCT | 6261 104% | 7095 92% | 6227 104% | 6441 101% | 7485 87% | 6854 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.2 | 60 -2% | 61.6 1% | 67 9% | 57 -7% | 60.7 -1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 94.7 | 93 -2% | 95 0% | 98 3% | 88 -7% | 94.5 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
-1% | 6% /
9% | 2% /
12% | -10% /
-12% | -7% /
-14% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (243 - 402, n=13) | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3218 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4520 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3463 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 55% | 104% | 68% | 188% | |
| Seq Read | 476.1 | 2035 327% | 2416 407% | 1501 215% | 2396 403% |
| Seq Write | 487.4 | 658 35% | 1170 140% | 630 29% | 1376 182% |
| 4K Read | 30.57 | 39.74 30% | 48.33 58% | 47.38 55% | 52.4 71% |
| 4K Write | 66.1 | 105.7 60% | 103.1 56% | 125.9 90% | 134.3 103% |
| 4K-64 Read | 352.9 | 461 31% | 1039 194% | 321.4 -9% | 876 148% |
| 4K-64 Write | 263.1 | 300.1 14% | 399.6 52% | 772 193% | 1529 481% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.092 | 0.061 34% | 0.058 37% | 0.091 1% | 0.029 68% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.055 | 0.051 7% | 0.036 35% | 0.046 16% | 0.027 51% |
| Score Read | 431 | 704 63% | 1329 208% | 519 20% | 1168 171% |
| Score Write | 378 | 471 25% | 620 64% | 961 154% | 1801 376% |
| Score Total | 1040 | 1479 42% | 2575 148% | 1719 65% | 3529 239% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 514 | 893 74% | 739 44% | 1248 143% | 1247 143% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 259.3 | 287.9 11% | 312.3 20% | 237.3 -8% | 460.2 77% |
| Copy Game MB/s | 521 | 618 19% | 486.3 -7% | 463 -11% | 1107 112% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T | |
| Honor Magicbook | |
| Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE | |
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| Honor Magicbook | |
| Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (927 - 2505, n=244) | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE | |
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| Honor Magicbook | |
| Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74 | |
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP930QAA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| Honor Magicbook | |
| Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74 | |
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NC0003GE | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213) | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1940 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8276 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1101 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1024x768 The Witcher 3 low | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (37 - 249, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8.8 - 50.9, n=64) | |
| 1366x768 The Witcher 3 medium | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (29 - 264, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8 - 27.9, n=29) | |
| 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 high | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11.2 - 92, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4.2 - 13.5, n=17) | |
| 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8 - 44.2, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2.97 - 5.2, n=7) | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 60.5 | 35.2 | 29.7 | 9.9 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 22.4 | 13.1 | 7.2 | |
| Rocket League (2017) | 56.7 | 31.6 | 21.4 |
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | -4% | 0% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 28.2 | 30.4 -8% | 27.9 1% | 29.3 -4% | 28.9 -2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.4 | 30.4 -7% | 27.9 2% | 29.3 -3% | 28.9 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 28.4 | 30.4 -7% | 27.9 2% | 29.3 -3% | 28.9 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.4 | 30.4 -7% | 27.9 2% | 29.7 -5% | 32.5 -14% |
| Load Average * | 35.7 | 31.7 11% | 36.2 -1% | 31.8 11% | 35.1 2% |
| Load Maximum * | 34.2 | 38.1 -11% | 45.2 -32% | 32.7 4% | 35.1 -3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 45 |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 28.4 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 35.7 / 34.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.2 °C / 84.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.9 °C / -1.7 F).
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.15 / 0.45 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 2.7 / 6 / 6.5 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
32.5 / 35.5 Watt |
   
| |
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.30 | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.90 | Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T i7-8565U, GeForce MX150, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.90 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -47% | -56% | -24% | -34% | -53% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.7 | 4.8 -78% | 3.5 -30% | 2.6 4% | 3.3 -22% | 3.8 -41% |
| Idle Average * | 6 | 8.6 -43% | 8.9 -48% | 5.6 7% | 6.8 -13% | 8.9 -48% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.5 | 10.4 -60% | 12.3 -89% | 7.3 -12% | 9.5 -46% | 11.9 -83% |
| Load Average * | 32.5 | 37.9 -17% | 54.2 -67% | 47 -45% | 40.8 -26% | 47.5 -46% |
| Load Maximum * | 35.5 | 48.5 -37% | 52.1 -47% | 61.8 -74% | 57 -61% | 52.5 -48% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.4 |
* ... smaller is better
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T i7-8565U, GeForce MX150, 50 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -32% | -28% | -33% | -31% | -27% | -34% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2238 | 1032 -54% | 1243 -44% | 1432 -36% | 1328 -41% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 720 | 498 -31% | 557 -23% | 424 -41% | 499 -31% | 550 -24% | 519 -28% |
| Load | 159 | 141 -11% | 133 -16% | 121 -24% | 124 -22% | 106 -33% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
De flesta som letar efter en Ultrabook tar antagligen först en titt på Dell, HP, Lenovo, Asus och Acer. Men utifrån vår erfarenhet med LG Gram 14 tycker vi den förtjänar samma uppmärksamhet som en XPS, Spectre eller ZenBook. LG:s lösning på 14 tum har två nyckelfördelar som de flesta konkurrenter inte har: en extraordinärt låg vikt på under 1 kg och en imponerande lång batteritid som ligger på en bra bit över 10 timmar. Bara dessa höjdpunkter kan vara nog för att locka användare som reser mycket och tycker att en skärm på 13 tum är för liten.
Det finns en lista över nackdelar och många är en konsekvens av den låga vikten. Som exempel saknar Gram 14 en del alternativ som ofta finns på andra Ultrabook-modeller vilket inkluderar Thunderbolt 3, NVMe, tryckkänslig skärm, matt panel, 4K UHD, Gorilla Glass och diskret grafik. I synnerhet bristen på Gorilla Glass-förstärkning gör att locket blir väldigt böjligt och mer mottagligt för skada. CPU-prestanda som ligger under genomsnittet, långsam laddning och svårigheter med service och underhåll begränsar systemets hållbarhet. Detta är en Ultrabook för resenärer snarare än en arbetshäst för kontoret som kommer vara ansluten till dockningsstationer och externa skärmar.
LG Gram 14 är en ohyllad och underskattad Ultrabook. Den som inte har ett behov av de många toppskiktsfunktioner eller anslutningsalternativ som brukar finnas på mer avancerade Ultrabook-modeller kommer verkligen gilla den superlätta Gram. Entusiaster eller digitala artister kommer däremot att önska något med mer CPU- och GPU-styrka.
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1
-
04/05/2019 v6(old)
Allen Ngo
Pricecompare
