Notebookcheck

Test: HP Pavilion Gaming 15t (i7-8750H, GTX 1060 3 GB) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Besparingar. Hur mycket är en 144 Hz-skärm värd? Pavilion Gaming 15t är HP:s senaste bidrag till marknaden för spellaptops, designad för att tävla med enheter såsom Acers Helio 300 och Dells G7. Även om de flesta aspekter av denna laptop är bra (inklusive skärmen med hög bilduppdatering) så har HP gjort en del besparingar i sitt försök att tillverka den bästa billiga bärbara speldatorn.

HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000 (Pavilion 15 Serie)
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q - 3072 MB, Kärna: 1063 MHz, Minne: 2002 MHz, GDDR5, Nvidia Optimus
Minne
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2666 / PC4-21300, 1333.3 MHz, 2 x 8 GB
Skärm
15.6 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 144 Hz bilduppdatering, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel HM370
Hårddisk
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB 
, 512 GB PCIe SSD + 1 TB 5400 RPM HDD, 1406 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Anslutningar
4 USB 3.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Kombinerad Hörlurar/Mikrofon, Kortläsare: SD/SDHC/SDXC-Kortläsare i fullstorlek, Brightness Sensor
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 25.4 x 366 x 254
Batteri
70 Wh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2 x 2W, Bang & Olufsen, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, B&O Play Audio Control, HP JumpStart, 12 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.349 kg
Pris
1370 USD
Länkar

 

Vänster: 2x USB 3.0 (Gen 1) Typ A, Kensington-lås, aktivitets-LED, SD-kortläsare
Vänster: 2x USB 3.0 (Gen 1) Typ A, Kensington-lås, aktivitets-LED, SD-kortläsare
Höger: Hörlurar, Ethernet, HDMI 1.4, USB 3.0 (Gen 1) Typ A, USB 3.0 (Gen 1) Typ C, DC-in
Höger: Hörlurar, Ethernet, HDMI 1.4, USB 3.0 (Gen 1) Typ A, USB 3.0 (Gen 1) Typ C, DC-in
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=200)
89.9 MB/s ∼100% +13%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79.5 MB/s ∼88%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼87% -2%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
 
76.47 MB/s ∼85% -4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼85% -4%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.22 MB/s ∼29% -67%
Dell G7 15-7588
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
22.53 MB/s ∼25% -72%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=198)
109 MB/s ∼100% +33%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼80% +6%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
 
86.87 MB/s ∼80% +6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s ∼79% +5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.76 MB/s ∼75%
Dell G7 15-7588
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
34.51 MB/s ∼32% -58%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32.06 MB/s ∼29% -61%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
692 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
690 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
677 MBit/s ∼98%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
663 MBit/s ∼96% -2%
Dell G7 15-7588
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
660 MBit/s ∼95% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=167)
593 MBit/s ∼86% -12%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
513 MBit/s ∼74% -24%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Wireless AC 9462
326 MBit/s ∼47% -52%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
643 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Dell G7 15-7588
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
642 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
640 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
632 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
630 MBit/s ∼98%
Average of class Gaming
  (213 - 697, n=167)
529 MBit/s ∼82% -16%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
458 MBit/s ∼71% -27%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Wireless AC 9462
355 MBit/s ∼55% -44%
314.7
cd/m²
356.9
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
349.7
cd/m²
357.5
cd/m²
367.8
cd/m²
341.3
cd/m²
371.8
cd/m²
356.6
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 371.8 cd/m² Medel: 350.7 cd/m² Minimum: 16.58 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 357.5 cd/m²
Kontrast: 993:1 (Svärta: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.19 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 3.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.324
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Dell G7 15-7588
LG Philips LGD053F, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
B156HAN02.1, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus FX503VM-EH73
AU Optronics B156HAN06.1, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
BOE07A1, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
LG Philips LGD0590, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
-130%
-101%
-169%
-146%
-179%
-104%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
17.6 (9.2, 8.4)
38.8 (16, 22.8)
-120%
36 (18.8, 17.2)
-105%
43.6 (19.2, 24.4)
-148%
36.8 (19.6, 17.2)
-109%
47.2 (23.6, 23.6)
-168%
33.2 (16.4, 16.8)
-89%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 (6, 5.2)
26.8 (14.4, 12.4)
-139%
22 (10.4, 11.6)
-96%
32.4 (18, 14.4)
-189%
31.6 (18.4, 13.2)
-182%
32.4 (18, 14.4)
-189%
24.4 (13.6, 10.8)
-118%
PWM Frequency
122000 (95)
200 (99)
Screen
-61%
-20%
-34%
-34%
-14%
-35%
Brightness middle
357.5
250.9
-30%
365
2%
282.8
-21%
235.9
-34%
275
-23%
268.7
-25%
Brightness
351
246
-30%
341
-3%
264
-25%
235
-33%
254
-28%
246
-30%
Brightness Distribution
85
89
5%
89
5%
88
4%
91
7%
90
6%
82
-4%
Black Level *
0.36
0.34
6%
0.32
11%
0.42
-17%
0.27
25%
0.27
25%
0.42
-17%
Contrast
993
738
-26%
1141
15%
673
-32%
874
-12%
1019
3%
640
-36%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.19
7.34
-75%
6.51
-55%
4.93
-18%
4.81
-15%
4.62
-10%
4.79
-14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.97
28.66
-311%
12.32
-77%
17.65
-153%
21.55
-209%
8.05
-15%
18.13
-160%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.2
4.42
-38%
2.9
9%
4.07
-27%
3.59
-12%
4.31
-35%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.5
6.8
-94%
7.65
-119%
3.8
-9%
3.1
11%
4.31
-23%
3.1
11%
Gamma
2.324 95%
2.164 102%
2.64 83%
2.449 90%
2.31 95%
2.49 88%
2.28 96%
CCT
7028 92%
6780 96%
8066 81%
6112 106%
6984 93%
7000 93%
7049 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
36
-40%
56
-7%
36
-40%
36
-40%
38
-37%
38
-37%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
56
-38%
86
-5%
57
-37%
56
-38%
59
-35%
59
-35%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-96% / -72%
-61% / -33%
-102% / -55%
-90% / -52%
-97% / -39%
-70% / -45%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 8.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8811 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
185 Points ∼89% +6%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼85%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
173 Points ∼84% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=37)
173 Points ∼84% -1%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
Intel Core i7-8705G
165 Points ∼80% -6%
MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059
Intel Core i7-8550U
162 Points ∼78% -7%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points ∼75% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 207, n=405)
151 Points ∼73% -14%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
144 Points ∼70% -18%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
139 Points ∼67% -21%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
134 Points ∼65% -23%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1408 Points ∼45% +63%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1388 Points ∼45% +61%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=39)
1095 Points ∼35% +27%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
Intel Core i7-8750H
863 Points ∼28%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
805 Points ∼26% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1408, n=406)
736 Points ∼24% -15%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points ∼24% -15%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
Intel Core i7-8705G
707 Points ∼23% -18%
HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
623 Points ∼20% -28%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
589 Points ∼19% -32%
MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059
Intel Core i7-8550U
502 Points ∼16% -42%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.1 Points ∼90% +6%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.99 Points ∼85%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (1.92 - 2, n=27)
1.966 Points ∼84% -1%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.94 Points ∼83% -3%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
Intel Core i7-8705G
1.89 Points ∼81% -5%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points ∼78% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.34, n=402)
1.675 Points ∼72% -16%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1.63 Points ∼70% -18%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
1.58 Points ∼68% -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
15.76 Points ∼58% +65%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.13 Points ∼56% +59%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (9.54 - 13.4, n=27)
12.2 Points ∼45% +28%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
Intel Core i7-8750H
9.54 Points ∼35%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
8.68 Points ∼32% -9%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.17 Points ∼30% -14%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
Intel Core i7-8705G
7.59 Points ∼28% -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 15.8, n=503)
7.2 Points ∼27% -25%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
6.74 Points ∼25% -29%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
6978 Points ∼64%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (6292 - 6643, n=10)
6484 Points ∼60%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5939 Points ∼55%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.85 - 8872, n=397)
4707 Points ∼43%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
4382 Points ∼40%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
4286 Points ∼40%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
39380 Points ∼79%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (29952 - 35307, n=10)
33562 Points ∼67%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
29330 Points ∼59%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21978 Points ∼44%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.7 - 39382, n=397)
17271 Points ∼35%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
16509 Points ∼33%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
386.665 s * ∼5% -114%
Average of class Gaming
  (117 - 2331, n=201)
327 s * ∼4% -81%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
231.67 s * ∼3% -28%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
Intel Core i7-8750H
180.545 s * ∼2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (125 - 181, n=5)
154 s * ∼2% +15%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Average of class Gaming
  (-1 - 207000, n=2867)
3173 Seconds * ∼14% -523%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (1 - 10645, n=33)
2542 Seconds * ∼11% -399%
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
714.328 Seconds * ∼3% -40%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
677.2 Seconds * ∼3% -33%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
590.45 Seconds * ∼3% -16%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
Intel Core i7-8750H
509.122 Seconds * ∼2%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
481.1 Seconds * ∼2% +6%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.99 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
9.54 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
72.71 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
175 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
863 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
99.45 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Hjälp
PCMark 10 - Score
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
5285 Points ∼68% +12%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
  (4724 - 5285, n=3)
5064 Points ∼65% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 6620, n=107)
4921 Points ∼63% +4%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002
4856 Points ∼63% +3%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
4812 Points ∼62% +2%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4724 Points ∼61%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
4707 Points ∼61% 0%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8300H, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
4266 Points ∼55% -10%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
  (5308 - 5705, n=3)
5474 Points ∼84% +3%
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
5410 Points ∼83% +2%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
5369 Points ∼82% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
5362 Points ∼82% +1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND
5347 Points ∼82% +1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5308 Points ∼81%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002
5174 Points ∼79% -3%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8300H, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
5098 Points ∼78% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=302)
4908 Points ∼75% -8%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus FX503VM-EH73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002
7238 Points ∼76%
Average of class Gaming
  (2303 - 9529, n=223)
5475 Points ∼57%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8300H, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
5251 Points ∼55%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus FX503VM-EH73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002
4940 Points ∼81% +7%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4606 Points ∼76%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
  (3968 - 4650, n=3)
4408 Points ∼72% -4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND
4253 Points ∼70% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=320)
4213 Points ∼69% -9%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
4129 Points ∼68% -10%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
4109 Points ∼67% -11%
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
3968 Points ∼65% -14%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8300H, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
3896 Points ∼64% -15%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4606 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5308 poäng
Hjälp
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Dell G7 15-7588
SK hynix SC311 SATA
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
Hynix HFS128G39TND
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
Asus FX503VM-EH73
SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
 
AS SSD
-87%
-120%
-212%
-92%
-117%
-73%
-30%
Copy Game MB/s
223.18
122.59
898 (607 - 1110, n=11)
Copy Program MB/s
126.93
69.16
379 (233 - 481, n=11)
Copy ISO MB/s
460.77
170.54
1246 (917 - 1770, n=11)
Score Total
4113
528
-87%
811
-80%
838
-80%
798
-81%
670
-84%
703
-83%
3836 (2348 - 4771, n=18)
-7%
Score Write
2087
181
-91%
196
-91%
128
-94%
178
-91%
195
-91%
207
-90%
1636 (147 - 2147, n=18)
-22%
Score Read
1319
233
-82%
414
-69%
497
-62%
411
-69%
343
-74%
334
-75%
1460 (896 - 2125, n=18)
11%
Access Time Write *
0.038
0.068
-79%
0.259
-582%
0.287
-655%
0.09
-137%
0.227
-497%
0.057
-50%
0.1793 (0.027 - 2.52, n=18)
-372%
Access Time Read *
0.051
0.161
-216%
0.626
-1127%
0.17
-233%
0.177
-247%
0.113
-122%
0.0489 (0.029 - 0.073, n=18)
4%
4K-64 Write
1808.44
99.6
-94%
120.14
-93%
78.92
-96%
95.53
-95%
103.63
-94%
129.41
-93%
1386 (96.2 - 1866, n=18)
-23%
4K-64 Read
1160.14
158.76
-86%
336.56
-71%
335.26
-71%
343.35
-70%
187.79
-84%
257.66
-78%
1231 (735 - 1823, n=18)
6%
4K Write
95.91
59.82
-38%
62.73
-35%
35.74
-63%
46.48
-52%
79.31
-17%
63.47
-34%
98.9 (1.76 - 134, n=18)
3%
4K Read
35.03
23.66
-32%
26.5
-24%
38.71
11%
20.44
-42%
31.48
-10%
26.23
-25%
49 (31.7 - 58, n=18)
40%
Seq Write
1829.47
220.29
-88%
128.2
-93%
131.64
-93%
328.42
-82%
123.53
-93%
138.06
-92%
1509 (487 - 1991, n=18)
-18%
Seq Read
1234.66
505.64
-59%
512.95
-58%
1230.64
0%
476.33
-61%
1237.74
0%
502.66
-59%
1799 (1099 - 2469, n=18)
46%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2306 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1938 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 601.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 535 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 991.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1268 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 44.61 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 129.5 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
11842 Points ∼67% +1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
11735 Points ∼67%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
11101 Points ∼63% -5%
Dell G7 15-7588
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
10798 Points ∼61% -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
  (6212 - 11735, n=9)
8836 Points ∼50% -25%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
8405 Points ∼48% -28%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8300H
8215 Points ∼47% -30%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H
7739 Points ∼44% -34%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H
7385 Points ∼42% -37%
Average of class Gaming
  (510 - 14228, n=509)
6822 Points ∼39% -42%
1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
21380 Points ∼42% +64%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
18349 Points ∼36% +41%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8300H
15101 Points ∼30% +16%
Dell G7 15-7588
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
14487 Points ∼28% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
  (12970 - 14487, n=9)
13496 Points ∼26% +4%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
13030 Points ∼26%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=508)
11826 Points ∼23% -9%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
9632 Points ∼19% -26%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H
9266 Points ∼18% -29%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H
7693 Points ∼15% -41%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
16131 Points ∼40% +53%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
14427 Points ∼36% +37%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8300H
11968 Points ∼29% +14%
Dell G7 15-7588
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
11309 Points ∼28% +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
  (9992 - 11315, n=9)
10581 Points ∼26% +1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
10511 Points ∼26%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=435)
10251 Points ∼25% -2%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H
7576 Points ∼19% -28%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
7059 Points ∼17% -33%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H
6145 Points ∼15% -42%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
112332 Points ∼61% +51%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
95034 Points ∼51% +27%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8300H
82006 Points ∼44% +10%
Dell G7 15-7588
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
81015 Points ∼44% +9%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
74599 Points ∼40%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
  (42781 - 81015, n=9)
70227 Points ∼38% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=426)
61960 Points ∼34% -17%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H
49254 Points ∼27% -34%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H
38631 Points ∼21% -48%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
37915 Points ∼21% -49%
3DMark 06 Standard
34189 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
12774 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
31926 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9348 poäng
Hjälp
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253Tooltip
The Witcher 3 high
låg med. hög ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 327231215102fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 50fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 1681116354fps
Rocket League (2017) 250216155fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
32.2 / 32.4 / 32.4 dB(A)
Hög belastning
40.2 / 47.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 28.3 dB(A)
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Dell G7 15-7588
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
Asus FX503VM-EH73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8300H, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
Noise
2%
-1%
8%
1%
-5%
-6%
off / environment *
28.3
28.1
1%
29
-2%
28
1%
27.8
2%
29
-2%
28.2
-0%
Idle Minimum *
32.2
29
10%
29
10%
28
13%
29.6
8%
29
10%
33.5
-4%
Idle Average *
32.4
29
10%
31
4%
28
14%
29.6
9%
33
-2%
33.5
-3%
Idle Maximum *
32.4
29.2
10%
33
-2%
28.5
12%
29.6
9%
41
-27%
33.7
-4%
Load Average *
40.2
40.6
-1%
45
-12%
34.9
13%
37.3
7%
44
-9%
41
-2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
45
49.8
-11%
45
-0%
40
11%
49.8
-11%
47
-4%
52.3
-16%
Load Maximum *
47.2
49.8
-6%
51
-8%
49.6
-5%
53.7
-14%
49
-4%
52.3
-11%

* ... smaller is better

 38.8 °C46 °C41.4 °C 
 35 °C44 °C37 °C 
 29 °C27.6 °C30.4 °C 
Max: 46 °C
Medel: 36.6 °C
45 °C46.8 °C45.2 °C
38.4 °C52 °C41 °C
27.2 °C27.8 °C32.2 °C
Max: 52 °C
Medel: 39.5 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  47 °C | Rumstemperatur 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.837.72534.4363131.435.14033.4335031.933.56335.632.88030.730.910029.329.512528.729.516029.442.92002749.525026.655.331526.159.840025.761.150024.662.363024.866.180026.766.2100025.565.5125024.669.7160024.868.1200023.861.6250023.863.7315023.559400023.464.7500023.364.5630023.365800023.164.71000023.262.41250023.152.61600022.948.5SPL36.477.1N2.741.1median 24.6HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000median 62.3Delta1.66.735.14033.436.835.636.835.434.133.833.833.53132.531.930.431.730.135.229.645.328.551.927.859.327.259.626.657.525.858.725.265.52570.225.167.324.369.42467.523.968.123.76523.763.823.65923.666.323.371.423.374.823.170.32361.62359.536.480.32.748.4median 24.3Dell G7 15-7588median 63.81.66.3hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Dell G7 15-7588 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.12 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 6 / 11.2 / 13.3 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 89.2 / 134.5 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell G7 15-7588
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, SK hynix SC311 SATA, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Hynix HFS128G39TND, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus FX503VM-EH73
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
8300H, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
6%
3%
5%
-28%
-28%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
6
5.5
8%
6
-0%
4.5
25%
12.8
-113%
12
-100%
9.38
-56%
Idle Average *
11.2
7.6
32%
9
20%
10
11%
15.4
-38%
14
-25%
15.95
-42%
Idle Maximum *
13.3
9
32%
13
2%
13.8
-4%
15.9
-20%
18
-35%
18.46
-39%
Load Average *
89.2
94
-5%
95
-7%
92.5
-4%
78
13%
92
-3%
95.68
-7%
Load Maximum *
134.5
154.4
-15%
134
-0%
123.2
8%
143.4
-7%
142
-6%
156.98
-17%
Witcher 3 ultra *
101.9
116.3
-14%
102
-0%
108.1
-6%
107.3
-5%
100
2%
135.56
-33%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
7tim 58min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6tim 15min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 35min
HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Dell G7 15-7588
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 56 Wh
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6
8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 48 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 52.5 Wh
Asus FX503VM-EH73
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 64 Wh
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 70 Wh
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
8300H, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 41 Wh
Battery Runtime
32%
16%
-35%
-28%
27%
-45%
Reader / Idle
478
656
37%
710
49%
340
-29%
626
31%
315
-34%
WiFi v1.3
375
452
21%
354
-6%
245
-35%
276
-26%
514
37%
207
-45%
Load
95
132
39%
100
5%
67
-29%
106
12%
42
-56%

För

+ gedigen tangentbordsplatta
+ fast och responsivt tangentbord
+ skärmen har snabba responstider
+ ljusstark skärm
+ bra färgprecision för sitt pris
+ boot-enheten är snabbare än på de flesta budgetenheter
+ bra portutbud med Thunderbolt 3
+ kompaktare än andra spellaptops från mittenskiktet

Emot

- CPU- och GPU-prestandan ligger under genomsnittet
- bara 3 GB VRAM
- skört lock
- högljudd fläkt vid belastning
- höljet blir varmt vid spelande
- medioker batteritid
Recenseras: HP Pavilion Gaming 15t 3BJ31AV. Recensionsex från Computer Upgrade King
Recenseras: HP Pavilion Gaming 15t 3BJ31AV. Recensionsex från Computer Upgrade King

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

HP Pavilion Gaming 15t är en blandad kompott. Även om den lyckas med att ta en del trevliga funktioner till de bärbara speldatorernas mittenskikt så misslyckas den på andra sätt. Som exempel är ett alternativ för 144 Hz-skärm i princip unikt i det här prisskiktet vilket ger Pavilion Gaming 15t en rejäl fördel gentemot sina rivaler. Å andra sidan arbetar svag CPU-prestanda och värmestrypning mot denna laptop.

Pavilion Gaming 15t är i princip en budgetversion av HP Omen 15. Pavilion delar en del funktioner med Omen-serien, precis som 144 Hz-skärmen, och gör dem tillgängliga på en lägre prisnivå. Omen 15t har bättre konstruktionskvalitet och lyxigare komponenter, men den kostar också mer.

Utöver HP:s interna konkurrenter finns det två hinder i vägen för Pavilion Gaming 15t: Dell och Lenovo. Dell G7 och Lenovos Legion Y530 är båda utmärkta mittenskikts-laptops som erbjuder liknande prestanda till liknande priser. G7 har allt som Pavilion erbjuder tillsammans med bättre konstruktionskvalitet, längre batteritid, högre prestanda samt bättre värmehantering. Den stora fördelen med Pavilion Gaming 15t är dess höga bilduppdateringsfrekvens. Pavilion Gaming 15t är dessutom kompaktare och lättare än G7, vilket kan tilltala gamers på resande fot.

För att summera: HP har konstruerat en konkurrenskraftig laptop som misslyckas på en del nyckelområden men som ändå är en kompetent spelmaskin. Om du vill ha en budget-spelmaskin så finns det bättre alternativ på marknaden. Men om 144 Hz tilltalar dig kan det vara värt att lägga 1.000 - 2.000 kronor extra på Pavilion Gaming 15t.

HP Pavilion Gaming 15t-cx0000 - 09/15/2018 v6
Sam Medley

Design
75 / 98 → 77%
Tangentbord
82%
Mus
69%
Anslutningar
58 / 81 → 71%
Vikt
61 / 10-66 → 91%
Batteri
88%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
93%
Programprestanda
97%
Temperatur
85 / 95 → 89%
Ljudnivå
81 / 90 → 90%
Audio
55%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Medel
75%
83%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: HP Pavilion Gaming 15t (i7-8750H, GTX 1060 3 GB) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Sam Medley, 2018-09-24 (Update: 2018-09-24)