Notebookcheck Logo

Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED recension: Multimedia-bärbar dator med extrem CPU-prestanda

Core i9-13980HX och RTX 4070 Laptop. Asus erbjuder en kraftfull maskin för kreativa användare i ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED. Intels Core i9-13980HX och den bärbara datorn GeForce RTX 4070 tar hand om prestandarelaterade frågor, men den nya 120 Hz OLED-panelen är inte helt övertygande.

Asus riktar sig främst till kreativa användare med ProArt Studiobook 16 och erbjuder en extra inmatningsfunktion i DialPad. Den nuvarande Studiobook 16 OLED 2023 använder Intels snabbaste mobila processor,Core i9-13980HX, i kombination med den nya GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop.skärmen har också förändrats, eftersom 4K OLED har bytts ut mot en 3K pekskärmsmodell med 120 Hz. Vår testenhet är high-end-modellen med 64 GB RAM och en 4 TB PCIe SSD för 3999 EUR (4380 USD). Alternativt finns det också en variant med RTX 4070 Laptop, 32 GB RAM och en 2 TB SSD för 3499 EUR (3800 USD) eller en RTX 4060 bärbar datormed 32 GB RAM och en 1 TB SSD för 2 999 EUR (3300 USD).

Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 (ProArt StudioBook 16 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i9-13980HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.6 GHz, 170 W PL2 / Short Burst, 130 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 2175 MHz, Minne: 2000 MHz, 130 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 535.98, Optimus
Minne
64 GB 
, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, 2 Slots, max. 64 GB
Skärm
16.00 tum 16:10, 3200 x 2000 pixlar 236 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, glansig: ja, 120 Hz
Moderkort
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Hårddisk
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47, 4096 GB 
, 3717 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH - cAVS
Anslutningar
2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm Stereo, Kortläsare: SD Express 7.0
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 23.9 x 356 x 271
Batteri
90 Wh, 5845 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webbkamera: 1080p with Privacy Shutter & IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Quad speakers, Tangentbord: Chiclet 1.4mm travel, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 240W PSU, Mouse, Stylus, MyAsus, ProArt Creator Hub, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.434 kg, Strömförsörjning: 737 g
Pris
4000 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.1 %
06/2023
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg23.9 mm16.00"3200x2000
86.2 %
03/2023
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg18 mm16.00"3840x2400
89.4 %
04/2023
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
1.8 kg16.5 mm16.00"2880x1800
89.2 %
04/2023
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
3 kg21.3 mm17.30"3840x2160
93.7 %
03/2023
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
M2 Max, M2 Max 38-Core GPU
2.2 kg16.8 mm16.20"3456x2234
88 %
04/2023
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg29.7 mm16.00"2560x1600

Case - ProArt är återhållsam

Asus använder svart plast för ProArt Studiobook 16, vilket känns ganska högkvalitativt. Det enda problemet är de släta ytorna, som är mycket mottagliga för fingeravtryck. Överlag är designen mycket återhållsam och bortsett från ProArt-logotypen på locket finns det inga andra visuella accenter. Så snart du öppnar locket fångar den stora DialPad under tangentbordet omedelbart ditt öga. Locket sitter något framför basenheten, men detta möjliggör också en maximal öppningsvinkel på nästan 180 grader

Stabiliteten är utmärkt, både för basenheten och locket. Inga knarrande ljud hörs vid vridbelastning och inget kan heller bucklas till. Gångjärnen är väljusterade: de förhindrar effektivt att enheten kränger och håller skärmen säkert på plats. Endast vid mycket små vinklar (mindre än 20 grader) stängs locket av sig självt på grund av vikten.

Med en vikt på knappt 2,5 kg är Studiobook inte lätt och på grund av sin storlek inte heller särskilt portabel. Notebooken ryms fortfarande i stora ryggsäckar, men tar naturligtvis mycket plats som en 16-tummare. Den är också den största 16-tummaren i jämförelsegruppen och inte heller mycket mindre än 17-tummare. Den bärbara datorn är också ganska tjock på cirka 2,5 cm och överträffas bara avZephyrus Duomed sin andra skärm. För 240-watts strömförsörjningen måste du räkna med ytterligare 740 gram för transport.

Storleksjämförelse

399 mm 284 mm 21.3 mm 3 kg355 mm 266 mm 29.7 mm 2.7 kg356 mm 271 mm 23.9 mm 2.4 kg355.7 mm 248.1 mm 16.8 mm 2.2 kg354 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg355.4 mm 250.4 mm 16.5 mm 1.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Utrustning - Thunderbolt 4 och HDMI 2.1

Portarna är fördelade över de främre områdena på båda sidorna och baksidan. De flesta USB-portarna finns på framsidan till höger, vilket kan bli trångt när de är fullt upptagna. Å andra sidan har Asus placerat strömuttaget, Ethernet-porten och HDMI-utgången på baksidan, där de inte är i vägen.

Vänster: USB-A 3.2 Gen.2 (10 GBit/s), 3,5 mm ljud, SD-kortläsare
Vänster: USB-A 3.2 Gen.2 (10 GBit/s), 3,5 mm ljud, SD-kortläsare
Höger: 2x USB-C 4.0 med Thunderbolt 4 (40 GBit/s, DisplayPort ALT-läge, PowerDelivery), USB-A 3.2 Gen.2 (10 GBit/s), plats för säkerhetslås
Höger: 2x USB-C 4.0 med Thunderbolt 4 (40 GBit/s, DisplayPort ALT-läge, PowerDelivery), USB-A 3.2 Gen.2 (10 GBit/s), plats för säkerhetslås
Bak: HDMI 2.1, strömförsörjning, 2,5 GBit/s Ethernet
Bak: HDMI 2.1, strömförsörjning, 2,5 GBit/s Ethernet

SD-kortläsare

På vänster sida finns den fullfjädrade SD-kortläsaren, som bara uppnår genomsnittliga överföringshastigheter via vårt referenskort (Angelbird AV Pro V60). Mycket mer är möjligt här, som tävlingen visar.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
196 MB/s +166%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
182 MB/s +147%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
181.2 (133.5min - 187.53max) MB/s +146%
Average of class Multimedia
  (17.6 - 205, n=66, last 2 years)
93.3 MB/s +27%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
74 MB/s 0%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
73.7 MB/s
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
66.3 (64.96min - 66.37max) MB/s -10%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
269 MB/s +224%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
222 MB/s +167%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
188.81 MB/s +127%
Average of class Multimedia
  (16.8 - 266, n=62, last 2 years)
122.6 MB/s +48%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
83.1 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
83 MB/s 0%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
75.43 MB/s -9%

Kommunikation

WLAN-modul under den primära SSD-enheten
WLAN-modul under den primära SSD-enheten

Asus installerar Intels moderna AX211 WLAN-modul, som är placerad under den primära SSD-enheten och kan bytas ut. I tandem med vår referensrouter från Asus är överföringshastigheterna mycket höga och stabila. Vi upplevde inga problem med WLAN-stabiliteten under vår granskning. En 2,5 Gbit/s Ethernet-port för trådbundna nätverk finns också på baksidan.

Networking
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1612 (min: 1550) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1735 (min: 1691) MBit/s ∼100%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1444 (min: 745) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1611 (min: 805) MBit/s ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1493 (min: 1452) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1638 (min: 1438) MBit/s ∼94%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW)
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
946 (min: 894) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
888 MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1596 (min: 1244) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1554 (min: 783) MBit/s ∼86%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1730 (min: 1700) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1803 (min: 1749) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
MediaTek RZ616
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1767 (min: 1634) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1738 (min: 1633) MBit/s ∼96%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1612 (1550-1667)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1735 (1691-1753)

Webbkamera

Webbkameran på 1080p tar hyfsade bilder i bra ljusförhållanden, men de är också något förvrängda. En IR-modul är också installerad, som stöder ansiktsigenkänning via Windows Hello.

ColorChecker
11.4 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
10 ∆E
9 ∆E
12 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
7 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604: 10.07 ∆E min: 2.75 - max: 20.16 ∆E

Tillbehör

Vår testenhet levererades med Asus Pen 2.0 samt den trådlösa ProArt-musen MD300, som har en RRP på 180 USD. Precis som den bärbara datorn har musen en liten DialPad installerad på sidan. Huruvida du kan använda den på ett meningsfullt sätt beror på vilken programvara du använder. Det är lite irriterande att man måste installera ArmoryCrate för att justera musinställningarna och att man inte kan göra detta i ProArt Creator Hub. Vid testning fungerade musen perfekt och klickningarna var mycket exakta, men också högljudda. De tysta knapparna på Logitech-möss, till exempel, är mycket tystare.

Underhåll

Den nedre höljeskåpan sitter fast med 10 Torx-skruvar (T5) och är fortfarande mycket hårt åtdragen efter att dessa skruvar har tagits bort. Det enklaste sättet att bända upp locket är vid de bakre fläktutgångarna. Inuti dominerar det stora kylsystemet och underhållsalternativen är också mycket bra, allt från WLAN-modulen (under den primära SSD-enheten), två SO DIMM-kortplatser till de två M.2 2280-kortplatserna för SSD-enheter. Vad som också är slående här är hur mycket utrymme den extra DialPad tar upp

Intern struktur
Intern struktur
2x SO-DIMM
2x SO-DIMM
DialPad tar upp mycket utrymme
DialPad tar upp mycket utrymme

Inmatningsenheter - DialPad och numpad

Tangentbord

Tangentbordet har en rörelse på 1,4 mm och en dedikerad numpad. Skrivkänslan är hyfsad, men tangenterna är inte de tystaste och i synnerhet mellanslagstangenten är ganska högljudd. Layouten tar också lite tid att vänja sig vid, eftersom piltangenterna är stora, men har flyttats nedåt. Den enradiga Enter-tangenten är inte heller perfekt. Det finns en vit belysning i tre steg, men den aktiveras inte automatiskt via en sensor.

Inmatningsenheter
Inmatningsenheter
Stora och strukturerade piltangenter
Stora och strukturerade piltangenter
Bakgrundsbelysning för tangentbord
Bakgrundsbelysning för tangentbord

Pekplatta

Asus DialPad
Asus DialPad

Den stora pekplattan fungerar utmärkt och kan klickas överallt, vilket kännetecknas av ett fylligt och tyst klickljud. Den speciella funktionen är DialPad, en stor roterande tryckknapp mellan pekplattan och tangentbordet. Implementeringen med Adobe-apparna fungerar bra, men mus- och tangentkombinationen är vanligtvis snabbare. Vid normal skrivbordsanvändning kan ljusstyrka och volym också justeras via DialPad, men detta går mycket snabbare via de vanliga specialtangenterna eller F-tangenterna.

Display - OLED-panel vid 120 Hz

Subpixelstruktur
Subpixelstruktur

Asus satsar för närvarande fullt ut på OLED-skärmar och Studiobook är inget undantag. I motsats till föregångaren med sin 4K OLED-skärm används här en OLED-pekskärm med 3.200 x 2.000 pixlar och en högre frekvens på 120 Hz. Den subjektiva bildkvaliteten är mycket bra, men precis som i den nyligen granskade ZenBook Pro 14 verkar ljusa områden lite korniga vid närmare granskning, vilket beror på pekskiktet. Ljusstyrkan justeras inte automatiskt till det omgivande ljuset.

Vi fastställde en genomsnittlig ljusstyrka på 350 cd/m² i normalt SDR-läge, men tack vare det extremt låga svartvärdet för OLED-paneler är kontrastförhållandet mycket högt. I HDR-läge är maxvärdet nästan 580 cd/m² i ett litet bildutsnitt och cirka 480 cd/m² i en nästan helt vit bild. HDR-läget måste dock först aktiveras manuellt i Windows-inställningarna, varefter färgprofilerna inte längre kan användas. Det finns inga halos på OLED-paneler.

348
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
ATNA60BX01-1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 365 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 350.1 cd/m² Minimum: 0.6 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 95 %
Mitt på batteriet: 346 cd/m²
Kontrast: 17450:1 (Svärta: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
89.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16.00
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.00
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung ATNA60CL03-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16.00
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
AUO41A2 B173ZAN06.C, Mini LED, 3840x2160, 17.30
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.20
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NE160QDM-NM4, MiniLED, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display
3%
3%
-1%
-1%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
99.6
99.9
0%
99.9
0%
92
-8%
99
-1%
99.4
0%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
100
0%
99.1
-1%
100
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
89.4
96.4
8%
96.3
8%
94.07
5%
88.5
-1%
90.8
2%
Response Times
-155%
12%
-2281%
-4440%
40%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
0.59 ?(0.29, 0.3)
2 ?(1, 1)
-239%
0.49 ?(0.26, 0.23)
17%
46.4 ?(24, 22.4)
-7764%
80.5 ?(38.5, 42)
-13544%
15.2 ?(11.2, 4)
-2476%
Response Time Black / White *
0.79 ?(0.34, 0.45)
1.98 ?(0.5, 1.48)
-151%
0.65 ?(0.37, 0.28)
18%
0.62 ?(0.42, 0.2)
22%
47.2 ?(20.6, 26.6)
-5875%
19 ?(10.6, 8.4)
-2305%
PWM Frequency
240 ?(100)
60
-75%
240 ?(100)
0%
2400
900%
14880 ?(100, 500)
6100%
12000 ?(100)
4900%
Screen
-9%
-15%
-12%
370%
-15%
Brightness middle
349
389.97
12%
400
15%
397.29
14%
504
44%
712
104%
Brightness
350
395
13%
399
14%
392
12%
487
39%
703
101%
Brightness Distribution
95
97
2%
93
-2%
93
-2%
94
-1%
95
0%
Black Level *
0.02
0.03
-50%
0.03
-50%
0.02
-0%
0.001
95%
0.07
-250%
Contrast
17450
12999
-26%
13333
-24%
19865
14%
504000
2788%
10171
-42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.1
2
5%
2.3
-10%
2.52
-20%
1.5
29%
1.7
19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.5
4.1
25%
4.15
25%
3.91
29%
3.3
40%
4
27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.1
1.68
20%
1.66
21%
2.52
-20%
1.2
43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.2
2.23
-86%
2.7
-125%
2.78
-132%
2.1
-75%
2.8
-133%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.41 91%
2.266 97%
2.63 84%
2.25 98%
2.21 100%
CCT
6545 99%
6323 103%
7047 92%
6412 101%
6882 94%
6978 93%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-54% / -36%
0% / -6%
-765% / -463%
-1357% / -740%
9% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN gråskala (profil: DisplayP3, målfärgrymd: P3)
CalMAN gråskala (profil: DisplayP3, målfärgrymd: P3)
CalMAN Saturation (profil: DisplayP3, målfärgrymd: P3)
CalMAN Saturation (profil: DisplayP3, målfärgrymd: P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker (profil: DisplayP3, målfärgrymd: P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker (profil: DisplayP3, målfärgrymd: P3)

Som vanligt finns det flera färgprofiler i MyAsus-programvaran, där "Native" är förinställt som standard. Här är färgerna något övermättade, vilket bör resultera i en något kraftfullare bild i praktiken. Den mest exakta profilen är DisplayP3, som vi också använde för våra mätningar med den professionella CalMAN-mjukvaran (X-Rite i1 Pro 2). I grund och botten är resultaten redan mycket bra och det finns inga problem när det gäller färgkast eller färgtemperatur, även om vissa enskilda färger ligger över den viktiga avvikelsen på 3. Vi kunde inte korrigera detta med vår egen kalibrering, vilket är anledningen till att vi inte tillhandahåller en profil för nedladdning i det här specifika fallet. P3-färgrymden är helt täckt.

jämfört med sRGB
jämfört med sRGB
mot P3
mot P3
jämfört med AdobeRGB
jämfört med AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.79 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.34 ms rise
↘ 0.45 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.59 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.29 ms rise
↘ 0.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

PWM - 0% ljusstyrka
PWM - 0% ljusstyrka
PWM - 20% ljusstyrka
PWM - 20% ljusstyrka
PWM - 40% ljusstyrka
PWM - 40% ljusstyrka
PWM - 60% ljusstyrka (DC-dimning)
PWM - 60% ljusstyrka (DC-dimning)
PWM - 80% ljusstyrka (DC-dimning)
PWM - 80% ljusstyrka (DC-dimning)
PWM - 100% ljusstyrka (DC-dimning)
PWM - 100% ljusstyrka (DC-dimning)

DC-dimning används i ljusstyrkeområdet från 100 till 60%, och klassisk PWM-flimmer vid 240 Hz under det. Så snart ljusstyrkan sjunker under 60% visas en varning om att DC-dimning inte längre är tillgänglig. Som ett alternativ finns den så kallade flimmerfria OLED-dimningen tillgänglig i MyAsus-programvaran, som vi undersökte i vår recension av Zenbook S 13 OLED. Det är verkligen ett användbart tillägg, men det är också besvärligt att behöva gå igenom programvaran hela tiden.

I skuggan
I skuggan
I solen
I solen

Pekskärmen är mycket reflekterande utomhus, så du bör undvika reflexer från fönster eller ljuskällor både inomhus och utomhus. Det är inte lätt, särskilt inte när solen skiner. Betraktningsvinkelns stabilitet är överlag mycket bra. Det är bara i mycket extrema vinklar som det typiska OLED-blåsticket uppträder.

Stabilitet i betraktningsvinkeln
Stabilitet i betraktningsvinkeln

Prestanda - Raptor Lake-HX & Ada Lovelace

 
 
 

Villkor för testning

Olika energiprofiler finns tillgängliga i den förinstallerade ProArt Creator Hub, som vi har listat i tabellen nedan. Vi utförde mätningarna och riktmärkena mestadels i Performance-läget , men vi tittar också på effekterna av de andra två lägena i vissa avsnitt.

Energiprofil CPU-belastning GPU-belastning Stresstest Max. fläktvolym
Standard 157/80 watt 90 watt CPU: 30 watt
GPU: 80 watt
47,6 dB(A)
Prestanda 170/130 watt 130 watt CPU: 55 watt
GPU: 105 watt
56,7 dB(A)
Full hastighet 170/130 watt 130 watt CPU: 64 watt
95 watt
58,9 dB(A)

Processor - Core i9-13980HX

Intels nuvarande high-end-modell i Raptor Lake-serien för bärbara datorer, Core i9-13980HX, används som processor. Denna erbjuder 8 snabba prestandakärnor och 16 effektivitetskärnor, vilket är anledningen till att chipet kan bearbeta totalt 32 trådar samtidigt. I Studiobook förbrukar processorn upp till ~170 watt och planar ut på 130 watt efter några minuters ihållande belastning. I stora bärbara speldatorer arbetar processorn lite snabbare, men jämfört med jämförelsegruppen med normala Intel-processorer eller Apple M2 Max har Studiobook en stor fördel. När det gäller enkelkärnig prestanda är Core i9 också före den nya AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, men den senare erbjuder ännu mer prestanda i flerkärniga tester samtidigt som den också arbetar mer effektivt

.


Bortom sockeln finns det inte mycket kvar att se av den bärbara datorns prestandaförmåga eftersom processorn bara får förbruka en mager 34/26 watt här. I CB R23-multitestet får den bara 11 576 poäng, vilket motsvarar ett underskott på 63%. StudioBook är därmed långsammare på batteriström änMacBook Pro 16 med sin M2 Maxdär det inte finns någon prestandaminskning på batteriström. Fler CPU-riktmärken finns tillgängliga i vår teknikavdelning.

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

02805608401120140016801960224025202800308033603640392042004480476050405320Tooltip
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø4477 (4374.45-4604.05)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2829 (2772.58-2962.96)
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø1739 (1422.32-2515.18)
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2950 (2913.75-3025.49)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max: Ø2074 (2068.47-2081.27)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX: Ø5385 (5255.55-5554.01)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
83.3 pt
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
81.6 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
 
80.5 pt
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
61.4 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max -6!
Apple M2 Max
61.3 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
55.9 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
51.1 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
49.3 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
34521 (32987.6min - 34521.3max) Points +12%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
30789 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (28301 - 33052, n=11)
30305 Points -2%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
20385 Points -34%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
19188 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
15306 Points -50%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
14767 Points -52%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4624 - 30789, n=101, last 2 years)
14189 Points -54%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2110 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (1825 - 2169, n=9)
2081 Points -1%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
1940 Points -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2110, n=99, last 2 years)
1713 Points -19%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
1707 Points -19%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
1699 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
1698 Points -20%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
1625 Points -23%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
13457 Points +14%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
11768 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (10353 - 12437, n=10)
11540 Points -2%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
7716 Points -34%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
7254 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
5926 Points -50%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1783 - 11768, n=97, last 2 years)
5352 Points -55%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
4044 Points -66%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
812 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (717 - 825, n=10)
789 Points -3%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
756 Points -7%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
657 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
657 Points -19%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
651 Points -20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 812, n=97, last 2 years)
646 Points -20%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
460 Points -43%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
5554 (5255.55min - 5554.01max) Points +21%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (4358 - 5172, n=11)
4708 Points +2%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
4604 (4374.45min - 4604.05max) Points
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
3025 (2913.75min - 3025.49max) Points -34%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
2963 (2772.58min - 2962.96max) Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
2515 Points -45%
Average of class Multimedia
  (785 - 4703, n=106, last 2 years)
2321 Points -50%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
2074 (2068.47min, 2068.57P1 - 2081.27max) Points -55%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
308 Points
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
307 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (289 - 312, n=11)
303 Points -2%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
285 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (142.6 - 308, n=99, last 2 years)
251 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
246 Points -20%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
243 Points -21%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
239 Points -22%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (107 - 662, n=95, last 2 years)
265 Seconds * -148%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
221 Seconds * -107%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
172 Seconds * -61%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
166 Seconds * -55%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (97 - 136, n=10)
109.3 Seconds * -2%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
107 Seconds *
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
93 Seconds * +13%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
135927 MIPS +13%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
119900 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (104616 - 129804, n=10)
118278 MIPS -1%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
76501 MIPS -36%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
74386 MIPS -38%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
60842 MIPS -49%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20166 - 119900, n=90, last 2 years)
57411 MIPS -52%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
7319 MIPS +2%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
7163 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (6230 - 7163, n=10)
6915 MIPS -3%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
6225 MIPS -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3398 - 7163, n=90, last 2 years)
5639 MIPS -21%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
5570 MIPS -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
5510 MIPS -23%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (18475 - 22200, n=10)
20092 Points 0%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
20053 Points
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
19583 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
15348 Points -23%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
13796 Points -31%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
13731 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
11497 Points -43%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3828 - 23059, n=100, last 2 years)
11372 Points -43%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2137 Points
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
2132 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (1796 - 2139, n=10)
2051 Points -4%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
2043 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max
1978 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (926 - 2342, n=100, last 2 years)
1758 Points -18%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
1718 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
1692 Points -21%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
34.8 fps +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (27 - 33.4, n=9)
31.1 fps +2%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
30.5 fps
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
22.3 fps -27%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
21 fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
16.8 fps -45%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4.99 - 30.5, n=88, last 2 years)
15.6 fps -49%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
60.4 s * -37%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
57.8 s * -31%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
51.6 s * -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
49.6 s * -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 84.9, n=92, last 2 years)
48 s * -9%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
44.2 s *
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (35 - 51.4, n=10)
43 s * +3%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4934 sec * -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.489 sec * -28%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.3826 - 0.723, n=90, last 2 years)
0.4811 sec * -26%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4286 sec * -12%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
0.3982 sec * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (0.3793 - 0.4462, n=10)
0.3959 sec * -3%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX
0.3826 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
4604 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
268 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
308 Points
Hjälp
Performance Rating
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
97.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
 
96.6 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71.5 pt
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
70.5 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
57.5 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
52.9 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
27340 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (21332 - 29553, n=9)
26707 KRay/s -2%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
19557 KRay/s -28%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
18385 KRay/s -33%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
14049 KRay/s -49%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3804 - 27411, n=88, last 2 years)
12788 KRay/s -53%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
136048 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (108001 - 148168, n=9)
132982 Points -2%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
95579 Points -30%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90834 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
69259 Points -49%
Average of class Multimedia
  (16379 - 136048, n=88, last 2 years)
65480 Points -52%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
6681 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (5264 - 7142, n=9)
6559 MB/s -2%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
4270 MB/s -36%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4187 MB/s -37%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
3247 MB/s -51%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1099 - 6681, n=88, last 2 years)
3047 MB/s -54%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (126758 - 143409, n=9)
138011 Points +3%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
134321 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
100136 Points -25%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
97006 Points -28%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95175 Points -29%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21547 - 134321, n=88, last 2 years)
92085 Points -31%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (13785 - 17117, n=9)
16075 Points +4%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15484 Points
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
10536 Points -32%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10485 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
9065 Points -41%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3099 - 15484, n=88, last 2 years)
9055 Points -42%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
68591 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (53398 - 73758, n=9)
66568 Points -3%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
48474 Points -29%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44967 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
34531 Points -50%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9602 - 68591, n=88, last 2 years)
33558 Points -51%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
149377 MB/s +16%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
128312 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (105169 - 136520, n=9)
126745 MB/s -1%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
83357 MB/s -35%
Average of class Multimedia
  (23702 - 169946, n=88, last 2 years)
76070 MB/s -41%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
67264 MB/s -48%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1901 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (1513 - 2039, n=9)
1894 MB/s 0%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
1198 MB/s -37%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1192 MB/s -37%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
997 MB/s -48%
Average of class Multimedia
  (302 - 1901, n=88, last 2 years)
868 MB/s -54%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (11431 - 16325, n=9)
14483 KRay/s +2%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
14155 KRay/s
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
10716 KRay/s -24%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9803 KRay/s -31%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
7496 KRay/s -47%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1996 - 14590, n=88, last 2 years)
6829 KRay/s -52%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
50488 MPixel/s +2%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49474 MPixel/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
48148 MPixel/s -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (37069 - 52949, n=9)
46025 MPixel/s -7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44611 MPixel/s -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7419 - 53918, n=88, last 2 years)
36824 MPixel/s -26%

Systemets prestanda

Systemets prestanda är utmärkt, både i de syntetiska referenserna och i praktiken. Inga problem uppstod heller under testningen.

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
9151 Points +22%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
8058 Points +8%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
7491 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
7491 Points 0%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7486 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6822 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4635 - 8670, n=85, last 2 years)
6602 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
12176 Points +11%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
11332 Points +4%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
10928 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
10928 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10544 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8480 - 12420, n=85, last 2 years)
10473 Points -4%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10215 Points -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
11833 Points +20%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10040 Points +2%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
9886 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
9886 Points 0%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9231 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5845 - 11186, n=85, last 2 years)
8709 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
8578 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
14432 Points +37%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
13575 Points +29%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11100 Points +5%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
10558 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
10558 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9527 Points -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4688 - 13548, n=85, last 2 years)
8686 Points -18%
CrossMark / Overall
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
2114 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
2114 Points 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2078 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1910 Points -10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1882 Points -11%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1745 Points -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1009 - 2146, n=91, last 2 years)
1701 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1569 Points -26%
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
1950 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
1950 Points 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1946 Points 0%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1781 Points -9%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1632 Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (971 - 2064, n=91, last 2 years)
1622 Points -17%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1618 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1479 Points -24%
CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z
2505 Points +4%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
2414 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
2414 Points 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2377 Points -2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1978 Points -18%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1948 Points -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1054 - 2865, n=91, last 2 years)
1893 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1691 Points -30%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1915 Points +6%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
1811 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
1811 Points 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1689 Points -7%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1533 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1495 Points -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (926 - 2171, n=91, last 2 years)
1462 Points -19%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1395 Points -23%
PCMark 10 Score
7491 poäng
Hjälp
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
74320 MB/s
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
73907 MB/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
71912 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (62189 - 80776, n=9)
71190 MB/s -4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66344 MB/s -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20513 - 94254, n=88, last 2 years)
61455 MB/s -17%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77376 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (62624 - 89096, n=9)
76728 MB/s -1%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
75425 MB/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
69534 MB/s -10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
68252 MB/s -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (22917 - 90142, n=88, last 2 years)
60555 MB/s -22%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
88988 MB/s +24%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
73602 MB/s +3%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71784 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (59912 - 79917, n=9)
69396 MB/s -3%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
68170 MB/s -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20226 - 95196, n=88, last 2 years)
63628 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Multimedia
  (75 - 346, n=87, last 2 years)
102.3 ns * -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
97.5 ns * -14%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94.4 ns * -10%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
90.6 ns * -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (79.4 - 93.2, n=9)
87.5 ns * -2%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85.6 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC-fördröjning

Studiobook är inte särskilt lämplig för ljudapplikationer i realtid. Höga latenser uppstod under den aktuella BIOS-versionen i vårt standardiserade latens-test.

LatencyMon - översikt
LatencyMon - översikt
LatencyMon - drivrutiner
LatencyMon - drivrutiner
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5418.4 μs * -168%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4545.9 μs * -124%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2750 μs * -36%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
2025.1 μs *
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1053.8 μs * +48%

* ... smaller is better

Lagringsenheter

Andra M.2 2880-kortplats
Andra M.2 2880-kortplats

En snabb PCIe 4.0 SSD från Phison används i vår testenhet, som erbjuder en enorm lagringskapacitet på 4 TB. Av detta är 3,63 TB fortfarande tillgängligt efter den första uppstarten. Enheten är mycket snabb med överföringshastigheter på mer än 7 GB/s och framför allt kan prestandan bibehållas konstant, även under permanent belastning. Detta är inte på något sätt standard. Studiobook 16 erbjuder dessutom ytterligare en M.2 2280-kortplats, som också är ansluten via det snabba PCIe 4.0-gränssnittet. Fler SSD-riktmärken listashär.

Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7071 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6274 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 588 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 572 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 70.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 181 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 579 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1112 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
83.9 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
76.1 pt
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
75.8 pt
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
 
75.8 pt
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
71.5 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
71.2 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
56.4 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
3687 (3440.34min - 3686.58max) MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
3687 MB/s 0%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3482 (3374.87min - 3481.9max) MB/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3005 (2951.71min - 3004.87max) MB/s -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (756 - 4861, n=87, last 2 years)
2872 MB/s -22%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2756 (2741.19min - 2756.29max) MB/s -25%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2519 MB/s -32%
seq write
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
4250 (4204.35min - 4249.88max) MB/s +12%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
3783 MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
3783 MB/s 0%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3546 (3447.32min - 3545.9max) MB/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3530 (3501.32min - 3530max) MB/s -7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3291 (3216.4min - 3290.77max) MB/s -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (790 - 5709, n=87, last 2 years)
2977 MB/s -21%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
7048 (6068.56min - 7047.9max) MB/s 0%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
7020 (6541.02min - 7019.8max) MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
7020 MB/s 0%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
6935 (5510.15min - 6934.86max) MB/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6601 (5818.24min - 6601.01max) MB/s -6%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6546 MB/s -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1023 - 7121, n=87, last 2 years)
5217 MB/s -26%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
6454 (6410.36min - 6454.19max) MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
6454 MB/s 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6004 (5933.65min - 6004.3max) MB/s -7%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4934 (4868.24min - 4934.38max) MB/s -24%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4926 (4833.5min - 4926max) MB/s -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4886 (4877.24min - 4885.61max) MB/s -24%
Average of class Multimedia
  (871 - 6761, n=87, last 2 years)
3947 MB/s -39%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
77.2 (76.37min - 77.18max) MB/s +9%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
71.1 (70.39min - 71.1max) MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
71.1 MB/s 0%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
66.9 (50.9min - 66.86max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (14.6 - 149.1, n=87, last 2 years)
64.5 MB/s -9%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
64.3 (63.09min - 64.34max) MB/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
53.1 (52.47min - 53.13max) MB/s -25%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
313 (306.34min - 313.21max) MB/s +71%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
236 (234.84min - 236.4max) MB/s +29%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
214 (213.09min - 214.01max) MB/s +17%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
183.3 (141.67min - 183.25max) MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
183.3 MB/s 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (80.9 - 378, n=87, last 2 years)
178.7 MB/s -3%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
164.3 (163.26min - 164.34max) MB/s -10%
4k q32 t16 read
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4040 (4004.73min - 4039.52max) MB/s +482%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3523 (3416.03min - 3522.69max) MB/s +408%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2518 (2508.69min - 2518.06max) MB/s +263%
Average of class Multimedia
  (416 - 4358, n=87, last 2 years)
1350 MB/s +95%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1158 (1132.18min - 1157.71max) MB/s +67%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
694 (677.77min - 693.63max) MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
694 MB/s 0%
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3597 (3488.54min - 3597.4max) MB/s +545%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3539 (3520.81min - 3538.51max) MB/s +534%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2002 (1558.72min - 2002.2max) MB/s +259%
Average of class Multimedia
  (192.1 - 4074, n=87, last 2 years)
1067 MB/s +91%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
558 (516.09min - 558.29max) MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
558 MB/s 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
481 (462.66min - 481.19max) MB/s -14%
AS SSD
Score Total
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8046 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7141 Points +1%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
7095 Points
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
7095 Points 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6435 Points -9%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
5636 Points -21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2010 - 9972, n=84, last 2 years)
5067 Points -29%
Score Read
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2979 Points +90%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2447 Points +56%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1805 Points +15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (669 - 3501, n=84, last 2 years)
1695 Points +8%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
1570 Points
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
1570 Points 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1554 Points -1%
Score Write
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
4813 Points
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
4813 Points 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
4164 Points -13%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3543 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3504 Points -27%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3012 Points -37%
Average of class Multimedia
  (545 - 4813, n=84, last 2 years)
2567 Points -47%
Seq Read
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5689 MB/s +6%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
5350 MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
5350 MB/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4685.43 MB/s -12%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4582 MB/s -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1192 - 5730, n=84, last 2 years)
4005 MB/s -25%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3634 MB/s -32%
Seq Write
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3904 MB/s +24%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3608 MB/s +15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3440.79 MB/s +10%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
3138 MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
3138 MB/s 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (388 - 5175, n=84, last 2 years)
2553 MB/s -19%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2310 MB/s -26%
4K Read
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
74.1 MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
74.1 MB/s 0%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
72.4 MB/s -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30 - 98.5, n=84, last 2 years)
62.7 MB/s -15%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
61.3 MB/s -17%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
59.2 MB/s -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
57.42 MB/s -23%
4K Write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
288 MB/s +23%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
235 MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
235 MB/s 0%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
203.1 MB/s -14%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
189.7 MB/s -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (66.5 - 328, n=84, last 2 years)
188.5 MB/s -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
186.47 MB/s -21%
4K-64 Read
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2543 MB/s +165%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1920.85 MB/s +100%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1285 MB/s +34%
Average of class Multimedia
  (413 - 2989, n=84, last 2 years)
1231 MB/s +28%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
961 MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
961 MB/s 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
925 MB/s -4%
4K-64 Write
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
4265 MB/s
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
4265 MB/s 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3584 MB/s -16%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2979 MB/s -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2973.32 MB/s -30%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2493 MB/s -42%
Average of class Multimedia
  (281 - 4265, n=84, last 2 years)
2123 MB/s -50%
Access Time Read
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.079 ms * -119%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.018 - 0.168, n=84, last 2 years)
0.0578 ms * -61%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.048 ms * -33%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.041 ms * -14%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
0.036 ms *
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
0.036 ms * -0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
0.029 ms * +19%
Access Time Write
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.013 - 0.414, n=84, last 2 years)
0.05992 ms * -361%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.023 ms * -77%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
0.021 ms * -62%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.02 ms * -54%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.013 ms * -0%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
0.013 ms *
Average Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
  ()
0.013 ms * -0%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604: Ø6965 (6265.82-7020.84)

Grafik

GPU-Z Nvidia
GPU-Z Nvidia
GPU-Z Intel
GPU-Z Intel

Förutom processorns integrerade GPU (UHD Graphics) är den snabba Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop också installerad. Grafikomkopplingen sker via Optimus, men det finns ingen Advanced Optimus eller en MUX-omkopplare. Med en maximal TGP på 130 watt är detta en av de snabbaste 4070 bärbara modellerna, men den här siffran är lite vilseledande. Som vi såg i vår första recension av de nya mobila GPU: erna kan detta värde nås i syntetiska tester som FurMark, men spel är begränsat till cirka 105-110 watt eftersom GPU: n når sin maximala klocka här

I benchmarks ligger RTX 4070 på den förväntade nivån bakomRTX 4080 bärbar dator och den 4090 bärbar datorjämfört med den gamla Studiobook 16 med sin RTX 3070 Ti,är försprånget på 7-15% inte så stort, så en uppgradering är inte riktigt värt det här. GPU-prestandan förblir stabil under permanent belastning, men prestandan är cirka 40% lägre i batteriläge (max. TGP 40 watt). Fler GPU-riktmärken finns tillgängliga på här.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
62240 Points +54%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
47145 Points +17%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
41480 Points +3%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
40331 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24229 - 45606, n=49)
40234 Points 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
36855 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
36220 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
22469 Points -44%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3505 - 60250, n=89, last 2 years)
18929 Points -53%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
47798 Points +67%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
36282 Points +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (16212 - 33451, n=48)
29156 Points +2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
28885 Points +1%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
28700 Points
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
27271 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
26769 Points -7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
26715 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
16174 Points -44%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1835 - 46022, n=90, last 2 years)
14005 Points -51%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
20033 Points +71%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
15051 Points +28%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
11798 Points +1%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
11730 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (6241 - 13336, n=48)
11728 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
10429 Points -11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
10307 Points -12%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
10236 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
5859 Points -50%
Average of class Multimedia
  (622 - 17620, n=90, last 2 years)
5310 Points -55%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
40668 Points +80%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple M2 Max
25103 Points +11%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
22642 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (17684 - 24275, n=8)
21519 Points -5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
21339 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1867 - 31403, n=39, last 2 years)
13102 Points -42%
Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
146413 Points +22%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
120093 Points
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
117970 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (17391 - 129366, n=47)
112282 Points -7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
112071 Points -7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
111799 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
106180 Points -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple M2 Max
71726 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
71151 Points -41%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10769 - 120093, n=99, last 2 years)
57593 Points -52%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
6841 Points -94%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 - GPU
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
1230 mpaths +107%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
812 mpaths +36%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
638 mpaths +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (500 - 686, n=33)
602 mpaths +1%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
595 mpaths
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
563 mpaths -5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
419 mpaths -30%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
404 mpaths -32%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
362 mpaths -39%
Average of class Multimedia
  (31 - 684, n=68, last 2 years)
249 mpaths -58%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU CUDA
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
1695 mpaths +45%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
1189 mpaths +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (120 - 1333, n=26)
1174 mpaths +1%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
1167 mpaths
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
858 mpaths -26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (209 - 1221, n=23, last 2 years)
829 mpaths -29%
GPU RTX
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
2272 mpaths +41%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
1744 mpaths +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (171 - 1868, n=26)
1630 mpaths +1%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
1607 mpaths
Average of class Multimedia
  (391 - 1738, n=22, last 2 years)
1290 mpaths -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
1123 mpaths -30%
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
140.08 fps +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (109.6 - 115.4, n=3)
113 fps +3%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
109.63 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (57.6 - 109.6, n=3, last 2 years)
75.9 fps -31%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
31.45 fps +38%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
22.75 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (20.7 - 23, n=3)
22.1 fps -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1.97 - 22.8, n=3, last 2 years)
9.31 fps -59%
Showcase (showcase-02)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
230.78 fps +108%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (111.2 - 122.2, n=3)
116.8 fps +5%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
111.17 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (27.7 - 111.2, n=3, last 2 years)
56.4 fps -49%
Medical (medical-02)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
120.28 fps +62%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (74.4 - 80.1, n=3)
77.5 fps +4%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
74.35 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (19.9 - 74.4, n=3, last 2 years)
40.8 fps -45%
Maya (maya-05)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
494.02 fps +55%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (319 - 356, n=3)
338 fps +6%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
319.16 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (63.6 - 319, n=3, last 2 years)
152.6 fps -52%
Energy (energy-02)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
70.56 fps +68%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
42.07 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (41 - 42.1, n=3)
41.7 fps -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.92 - 42.1, n=3, last 2 years)
19.3 fps -54%
Creo (creo-02)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
377.82 fps +57%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (241 - 263, n=3)
251 fps +4%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
241.03 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (49.1 - 241, n=3, last 2 years)
117.1 fps -51%
Catia (catia-05)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
266.33 fps +77%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (150.2 - 158.8, n=3)
154.3 fps +3%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
150.22 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (77 - 150.2, n=3, last 2 years)
104.3 fps -31%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
338.22 fps +57%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (216 - 243, n=3)
231 fps +7%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
215.97 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (55.7 - 216, n=3, last 2 years)
111.5 fps -48%
SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
426.16 fps +71%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (250 - 271, n=5)
258 fps +3%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
249.69 fps
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
199.4 fps -20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (17.2 - 250, n=4, last 2 years)
95.2 fps -62%
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
309.1 fps +1273%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
31.26 fps +39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (22 - 24.4, n=5)
22.7 fps +1%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
22.52 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (1.94 - 22.5, n=4, last 2 years)
7.55 fps -66%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
58.7 fps +69%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
55.09 fps +59%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32.2 - 36.9, n=5)
34.7 fps 0%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
34.67 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.05 - 34.7, n=4, last 2 years)
20.4 fps -41%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (355 - 408, n=5)
382 fps +5%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
363.61 fps
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
290 fps -20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (72 - 364, n=3, last 2 years)
220 fps -39%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
70.65 fps +68%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
67.9 fps +62%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (41.3 - 42.9, n=5)
42 fps 0%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
41.97 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.92 - 42, n=4, last 2 years)
18 fps -57%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
139.7 fps +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (108.9 - 121.2, n=5)
114.2 fps +1%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
113.27 fps 0%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
112.95 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (30.8 - 113, n=3, last 2 years)
66.9 fps -41%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
98.8 fps +56%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (63.5 - 68.6, n=5)
65.4 fps +3%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
63.45 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (15.7 - 63.5, n=4, last 2 years)
29.3 fps -54%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
17.84 fps -72%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
206.67 fps +113%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
123.1 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (96.9 - 99.9, n=5)
98.3 fps +1%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
96.87 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (20.3 - 96.9, n=4, last 2 years)
46.4 fps -52%
3DMark 11 Performance
35000 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
25949 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
12384 poäng
Hjälp
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Multimedia
  (19 - 99, n=45, last 2 years)
41.5 Seconds * -89%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
34 Seconds * -55%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
30 Seconds * -36%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
24 Seconds * -9%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
22 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18 - 28, n=47)
21.6 Seconds * +2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
21 Seconds * +5%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
20 Seconds * +9%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
13 Seconds * +41%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Multimedia
  (32 - 172, n=48, last 2 years)
76.5 Seconds * -113%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
61 Seconds * -69%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
46 Seconds * -28%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
44 Seconds * -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 172, n=51)
43.7 Seconds * -21%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
36 Seconds *
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
34 Seconds * +6%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
27 Seconds * +25%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
20 Seconds * +44%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL
Average of class Multimedia
  (29.6 - 132, n=8, last 2 years)
75.6 Seconds *
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple M2 Max
51.2 Seconds *
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (190 - 1374, n=83, last 2 years)
447 Seconds * -135%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
386 Seconds * -103%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple M2 Max
326 Seconds * -72%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
304 Seconds * -60%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 428, n=47)
289 Seconds * -52%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
285 Seconds * -50%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
279 Seconds * -47%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
263 Seconds * -38%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
190 Seconds *
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
147 Seconds * +23%

* ... smaller is better

Spelprestanda

Studiobook 16:s spelprestanda är mycket bra och även moderna titlar kan spelas i QHD-upplösning utan problem. Endast ray tracing kräver vanligtvis uppskalning för att kunna spelas smidigt. Ett bra exempel här är Cyberpunk 2077, där endast 26 FPS är möjligt med Ray Tracing Ultra-förinställningen, men detta blir 84 FPS med DLSS (inklusive Frame Generation). Naturligtvis kan hastighetsökningen variera beroende på titel och Cyberpunk är en flaggskeppstitel för DLSS. Spelprestandan förblir stabil under längre sessioner, men den övergripande fördelen jämfört med den gamla studioboken med dess RTX 3070 Ti är minimal.

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
98.3 pt
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
81.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) -1!
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
79 pt
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76.3 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75.8 pt
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
73.3 pt
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
57.3 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
41.4 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
39.3 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
178.6 (172min, 173P1) fps +67%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
159.7 fps +49%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
145 fps +35%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116 (48.5P0.1, 82.5P1) fps +8%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
107.1 (95min, 103P1) fps
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105.6 (95min, 95.44P1) fps -1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
89.9 (87min, 88P1) fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
60.1 (51min) fps -44%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=99, last 2 years)
50.6 fps -53%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
134 (7.27min, 90.9P1) fps +9%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
123.2 (3.96min, 76.9P1) fps 0%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
123 (8.87min, 83.3P1) fps
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
122.7 (6.05min, 66.7P1) fps 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
122.2 (8.62min, 83.3P1) fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
107.2 (3.65min, 71.4P1) fps -13%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
85.8 (21.2min, 52.6P1) fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
65.3 (21.8min, 35.7P1) fps -47%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4.24 - 123, n=88, last 2 years)
56.3 fps -54%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
169.6 fps +48%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
134 fps +17%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116.2 fps +1%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
114.7 fps
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
106.9 fps -7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
91.8 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
56.9 fps -50%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.53 - 141.8, n=89, last 2 years)
50.6 fps -56%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
333 (38min, 227P1) fps +133%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
269 (35.8min, 193.4P1) fps +89%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
204 (39min, 153.9P1) fps +43%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
183.8 (60.2min, 134.8P1) fps +29%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
183.3 (43.8min, 135P1) fps +28%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
160 (89.3min, 114P1) fps +12%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
142.7 (37.9min, 70.5P1) fps
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
103.9 (65min, 77.7P1) fps -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 233, n=86, last 2 years)
89.9 fps -37%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
179.7 (153.7min) fps +5%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
171.6 (147.3min) fps
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
159.2 (138.2min) fps -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
154.3 (130.7min) fps -10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
144.5 (123.6min) fps -16%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
136.2 (111min) fps -21%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
117 (97min) fps -32%
Average of class Multimedia
  (26.3 - 171.6, n=90, last 2 years)
101.6 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
73.5 (63.9min) fps -57%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
131.1 fps
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
117.8 fps -10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.3 fps -12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
111 fps -15%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
108.4 fps -17%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
106.1 fps -19%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
81.6 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
79 fps -40%
Average of class Multimedia
  (23 - 131.1, n=95, last 2 years)
68.4 fps -48%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
178.6 (172min, 173P1) fps +67%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
159.7 fps +49%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
145 fps +35%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116 (48.5P0.1, 82.5P1) fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69.8 - 133.7, n=50)
111.1 fps +4%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
107.1 (95min, 103P1) fps
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105.6 (95min, 95.44P1) fps -1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
89.9 (87min, 88P1) fps -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max, Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
76 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
60.1 (51min) fps -44%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 143.2, n=99, last 2 years)
50.6 fps -53%
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
130.6 (34.83min) fps +50%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
94.9 (33.7min) fps +9%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (48 - 110, n=24)
85.4 fps -2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84.75 (28.94min) fps -3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
81.3 (28.3min) fps -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
80.6 (38.91min) fps -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 103, n=44, last 2 years)
45.5 fps -48%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
44.4 (15.3min) fps -49%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
86 fps +59%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
63.39 (27.74min) fps +17%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
54 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (30 - 63.9, n=24)
53.4 fps -1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
53.28 (28.06min) fps -1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
51 (41.5min) fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
48.56 (11.82min) fps -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (15.6 - 89, n=24, last 2 years)
38.7 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
27.2 (22.1min) fps -50%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
149 fps +3%
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
145 fps
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
137 (118min) fps -6%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
136 (105min) fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (92 - 158, n=28)
129.4 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
71 (47min) fps -51%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18 - 145, n=59, last 2 years)
70.7 fps -51%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
60 fps -59%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117 fps
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
116 (88min) fps -1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (79 - 128, n=26)
109.2 fps -7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 H7600ZW
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
104 (89min) fps -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18 - 117, n=39, last 2 years)
64.9 fps -45%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
58 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
56 (46min) fps -52%
CPU/GPU-data Witcher 3 (Ultra-inställningar)
CPU/GPU-data Witcher 3 (Ultra-inställningar)

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø107.1 (95-113)
låg med. hög ultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 183.4 179 123 94.5
The Witcher 3 (2015) 249 107.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 215 192.8 184.4 171.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 162.4 114.7 85.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 181.6 164.3 131.1
Far Cry 5 (2018) 187 162 154 145 117
Strange Brigade (2018) 315 162.1 150.6 142.7 95.3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 153 103
F1 2021 (2021) 441 336 264 149.8 110.9
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 129 113 96 87 54
F1 22 (2022) 138.5 133.8 111.2 59.4 42.4
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) 102 72

Utsläpp - Högt, högre, studiobok

Buller

De två fläktarna är vanligtvis tysta under vardagliga uppgifter, men blir snabbt högljudda så snart antingen CPU eller GPU kommer under stress. Vi har listat värdena i tabellen nedan, men vi rekommenderar i allmänhet hörlurar eller headset när du spelar. Du kan hoppa över Full Speed-läget här, eftersom det bara blir högre och det inte finns någon prestandafördel. Inga andra elektroniska ljud, som t.ex. vinande spole, upptäcktes

Energiprofil 3DMark 06 Witcher 3 Cyberpoint 2077 Stresstest
Standard 43,6dB(A) 43,6dB(A) 47,6dB(A) 47,6dB(A)
Prestanda 43,6 dB(A) 43,6 dB(A) 47,6 dB(A) 47,6 dB(A)
Full hastighet 58,9 dB(A) 58,9 dB(A) 58,9 dB(A) 58,9 dB(A)

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
24.5 / 24.5 / 24.5 dB(A)
Hög belastning
47.6 / 56.7 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 24.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.542.239.736.834.435.62534.538.933.138.932.5313132.436.331.429.726.826.44032.637.432.629.52827.65029.337.129.327.426.625.56328.830.829.5282324.78032.232.626.223.719.620.410033.231.824.121.920.618.612533.331.228.824.919.21816031.830.727.123.81817.62003534.528.526.217.718.325036.936.633.629.319.921315383832.228.316.616.840039.74032.129.315.215.150041.34233.631.415.514.463041.140.932.830.213.512.680043.24234.33113.112.3100044.643.636.432.311.712125045.745.437.633.21111.9160047.946.938.434.810.912.1200046.645.937.433.210.912.7250046.645.137.232.610.911.9315044.443.436.331.811.212.2400045.243.835.130.911.712.4500044.143.334.431.111.912.5630042.642.433.629.112.312.7800042.642.53126.612.312.81000040.539.72721.912.212.61250037.436.323.11812.112.51600034.934.21916.811.412.6SPL56.755.947.643.624.525N11.310.86.14.50.60.7median 41.3median 42median 33.6median 29.3median 12.3median 12.6Delta4.64.543.82.71.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
Noise
-3%
6%
9%
13%
-9%
off / environment *
24.5
23
6%
25
-2%
24
2%
23.9
2%
23.9
2%
Idle Minimum *
24.5
23
6%
26
-6%
24
2%
23.9
2%
23.9
2%
Idle Average *
24.5
23
6%
27
-10%
24
2%
23.9
2%
32.9
-34%
Idle Maximum *
24.5
33.64
-37%
28
-14%
24
2%
23.9
2%
36.5
-49%
Load Average *
47.6
51.49
-8%
40
16%
34.49
28%
36.6
23%
42.9
10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
55.9
55.27
1%
39
30%
48.29
14%
35.1
37%
51.2
8%
Load Maximum *
56.7
55.24
3%
41
28%
49.66
12%
43.2
24%
56
1%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Yttemperaturerna är överlag oproblematiska, men datorns starka komponenter gör sig snabbt påminda, även i viloläge. Eftersom fläktarna inte körs här uppmätte vi mer än 30 °C. Under belastning är basenhetens ovansida fortfarande ganska bekväm med maximalt 45 °C och det finns inga begränsningar när du skriver. Undersidan når ett maximum på knappt 48 °C i mitten, vilket är anledningen till att du teoretiskt sett kan placera enheten i ditt knä (men det är osannolikt med tanke på storleken).

De två komponenterna planar ut mycket snabbt i stresstestet, varvid grafikkortet föredras av systemet och arbetar med cirka 105 watt, medan processorn fortfarande är ~55 watt. Ingen prestandaminskning direkt efter stresstestet registrerades.

Stresstest av CPU/GPU-data
Stresstest av CPU/GPU-data
 39.2 °C44.1 °C38.8 °C 
 36.2 °C39.8 °C34.1 °C 
 32.1 °C30.4 °C30.5 °C 
Max: 44.1 °C
Medel: 36.1 °C
47.6 °C48 °C47.9 °C
40.4 °C45.2 °C40.6 °C
33.5 °C34.2 °C32.1 °C
Max: 48 °C
Medel: 41.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  47.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.3 °C / 90.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.5 °C / -6.3 F).
Spänningsprovning av yttemperaturer (överst)
Spänningsprovning av yttemperaturer (överst)
Spänningsprovning av yttemperaturer (botten)
Spänningsprovning av yttemperaturer (botten)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Apple M2 Max, Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Heat
18%
18%
-1%
20%
7%
Maximum Upper Side *
44.1
41
7%
41
7%
47
-7%
44.2
-0%
44.2
-0%
Maximum Bottom *
48
47
2%
44
8%
54
-13%
42.9
11%
46.8
2%
Idle Upper Side *
32.7
23
30%
23
30%
30
8%
22.4
31%
29.2
11%
Idle Bottom *
34.9
23
34%
26
26%
32
8%
22.3
36%
30.2
13%

* ... smaller is better

Högtalare

Ljudsystemet består av fyra högtalare som ger bra ljudkvalitet. Även om det inte är tillräckligt för att konkurrera med MacBook Pro 16eftersom det fortfarande saknar lite tryck, är det ändå tillfredsställande överlag. Prestandan är tillräcklig för videor och lite bakgrundsmusik, och du kan inte höra mycket från högtalarna under spel ändå på grund av de högljudda fläktarna.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.442.52532.538.43126.836.4402840.85026.632.5632334.18019.635.210020.639.212519.245.81601851.620017.758.725019.965.231516.667.540015.267.950015.566.663013.570.180013.171.2100011.768.812501166.5160010.971.1200010.972.5250010.971.3315011.268.8400011.772.6500011.971.2630012.373800012.3761000012.277.81250012.173.41600011.465.2SPL24.584N0.662.6median 12.3median 68.8Delta2.74.328.728.427.529.2242528.33625.935.521.750.218.554.123.664.11766.815.868.719.172.816.673.716.675.210.573.712.573.511.773.29.674.910.274.310.175.710.475.310.576.411.176.211.574.211.972.212.370.912.470.412.570.512.669.312.568.211.867.423.986.10.573.8median 12.3median 73.52.52.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energihantering - StudioBook med kort batteritid

Strömförbrukning

240 watt strömförsörjning
240 watt strömförsörjning

På grund av den stora OLED-panelen och HX-processorn ensam är effektiviteten hos Studiobook 16 inte särskilt bra. Vi uppmätte mellan 12-21 watt i viloläge, beroende på ljusstyrka, även om det ibland når upp till 36 watt i HDR-läge. Under belastning finns det inga överraskningar: det stiger till cirka 200 watt under spel och planar ut på cirka 210 watt efter de första ~ 247 watt i stresstestet. Den medföljande 240-watts strömförsörjningen är därmed tillräckligt stor.

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.24 / 0.54 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 12.8 / 19.9 / 20.3 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 131.4 / 246.8 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47, OLED, 3200x2000, 16.00
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.00
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16.00
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, Mini LED, 3840x2160, 17.30
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
M2 Max, M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.20
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, MiniLED, 2560x1600, 16.00
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
18%
61%
10%
34%
-35%
7%
41%
Idle Minimum *
12.8
11.8
8%
3
77%
13.9
-9%
5.2
59%
19.2
-50%
Idle Average *
19.9
16.1
19%
5
75%
20
-1%
16.5
17%
29.7
-49%
Idle Maximum *
20.3
17
16%
11
46%
20.6
-1%
16.8
17%
30.8
-52%
24.1 ?(9 - 55.4, n=41)
-19%
Load Average *
131.4
100.6
23%
72
45%
77
41%
113
14%
126
4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
196.5
158
20%
69.7
65%
162
18%
92
53%
258
-31%
Load Maximum *
246.8
192
22%
108
56%
216
12%
145
41%
330
-34%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø196.5 (178-212)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø213 (195.3-247)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø18.4 (12.9-25.5)

Power consumption with an external monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø195 (94.6-239)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø225 (212-230)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø83.2 (78.4-93.6)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø228 (221-240)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø195.7 (185.7-202)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø193.5 (178.3-205)
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø21.3 (12.6-35.5)

Batteritid

Med tanke på förbrukningshastigheten är det knappast förvånande att batteritiden inte är särskilt bra trots 90 Wh-batteriet. Som standard växlar den bärbara datorn till 60Hz-läge så snart du kopplar ur den. Trots detta registrerade vi bara 5,5 timmar i WLAN-testet vid 150 cd/m² (120 Hz: 5 timmar) och cirka 4,5 timmar vid full ljusstyrka (120 Hz: ~3,5 timmar). Videotestet pågår i knappt 6 timmar. En HDR-video med full ljusstyrka tömmer batteriet efter ~2:40 timmar och cirka en timme under belastning trots den minskade prestandan.

Drifttid för HDR-video
Drifttid för HDR-video
Laddningskurva
Laddningskurva
Batteritid
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 114)
5tim 34min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 114)
4tim 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5tim 58min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 05min
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 88 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
M2 Max, M2 Max 38-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
50%
86%
15%
127%
-26%
73%
H.264
358
442
23%
803
124%
334
-7%
1124
214%
230
-36%
WiFi v1.3
334
448
34%
576
72%
336
1%
887
166%
238
-29%
Load
65
126
94%
106
63%
98
51%
66
2%
57
-12%
Witcher 3 ultra
155

För

+ stabilt fall
+ mycket hög CPU-prestanda
+ mycket bra systemprestanda
+ 120Hz OLED med bra bildkvalitet
+ mjukvarulösning mot PWM-flimmer
+ bra inmatningsenheter med en extra knappsats
+ 2x SO DIMM & 2x PCIe 4.0 SSD

Emot

- OLED med ett något kornigt bildintryck på ljusa ytor
- mycket högljudda fläktar
- massiv prestandaförlust i batteriläge (särskilt CPU)
- kort batteritid
- PWM (om du använder den normala ljusstyrkan i Windows)
- begränsade HDR-funktioner

Omdöme - Studiobook 16 med svagheter i detaljerna

I recension: Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED. Testenheten tillhandahölls av Asus Tyskland.
I recension: Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED. Testenheten tillhandahölls av Asus Tyskland.

Den nya 2023 ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED erbjuder mycket prestanda och är en bra bärbar dator för kreativa användare överlag, även om det finns några svaga punkter i detaljerna. Först och främst är Core i9-13980HX, som Intels snabbaste mobila processor, erbjuder mycket CPU-kraft, men faller fortfarande bakom AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX när det gäller flerkärnig prestanda och effektivitet. Jämfört med Core i9-12900H av den gamla modellen, å andra sidan, erbjuder den betydligt mer prestanda. Detta gäller dock inte grafikkortet, eftersom RTX 4070 bärbar dator är bara något snabbare än RTX 3070 Ti, så uppgraderingen är inte riktigt värt det här. Andra kritikpunkter inkluderar konventionell kylning och fläktljud i synnerhet, eftersom enheten snabbt blir mycket högljudd. Åtminstone förblir temperaturerna inom gränserna.

OLED-skärmen har ändrats från 4K-panelen med 60 Hz till en 120 Hz pekskärm med en något lägre upplösning. Bildkvaliteten är i grunden mycket bra, men som andra OLED-pekskärmar från Asus verkar ljusa områden något korniga. Det finns också små färgavvikelser som vi inte kunde korrigera med vår egen kalibrering. OLED-skärmen har också en negativ inverkan på batteritiden. Mjukvarufunktionen mot PWM-flimmer är bra, men justeringar måste göras via mjukvaran varje gång, vilket är besvärligt.

Massor av kraft, men också högljudda fläktar: ProArt Studiobook 16 är utan tvekan en snabb enhet och DialPad kan ge mervärde för kreativa användare. Men 120 Hz OLED är inte helt övertygande.

Förutom pekskärmen erbjuder Studiobook 16 återigen den extra DialPad, som fungerar särskilt bra med Adobe-apparna och kan också erbjuda mervärde här. HDR-funktionerna är fortfarande begränsade, men det beror på Windows. HDR måste aktiveras manuellt och färgprofiler är då inte längre tillgängliga. Dessutom har mini LED-paneler en fördel när det gäller maximal ljusstyrka. Även om MacBook Pro 16 erbjuder betydligt mindre CPU-prestanda (åtminstone i nätdrift), är det fortfarande ett mycket bra val för kreativa användare och erbjuder betydligt längre batteritid vid daglig användning. Ännu mer prestanda erbjuds av ROG Zephyrus Duo 16, som är listad som en gamer, men som också är intressant för innehållsskapare tack vare den andra skärmen.

Pris och tillgänglighet

En variant av Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED (Intel Core i9-13980HX CPU, Nvidia Geforce RTX 4070 GPU, 32GB DDR5 SO-DIMM RAM, 1TB SSD) är tillgänglig via Amazon USA för $2499,99.

Priserna gäller från 29.06.23 och kan komma att ändras.

Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 - 06/27/2023 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Design
90 / 98 → 92%
Tangentbord
92%
Mus
94%
Anslutningar
73 / 80 → 92%
Vikt
60 / 20-72 → 77%
Batteri
66 / 95 → 69%
Skärm
89%
Spelprestanda
100 / 90 → 100%
Programprestanda
96 / 90 → 100%
Temperatur
59%
Ljudnivå
76 / 95 → 80%
Audio
89%
Camera
34 / 85 → 40%
Medel
78%
86%
Multimedia - Vägt medel

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED recension: Multimedia-bärbar dator med extrem CPU-prestanda
Andreas Osthoff, 2023-06-29 (Update: 2023-06-29)