Notebookcheck

Test: Motorola Moto G6 Plus Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Mike Wobker (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 06/08/2018

G som i galant. Motorola marknadsför toppmodellen i G6-serien som en telefon med en förträfflig kamera och utmärkt prestanda. För en kostnad på 3.000 kronor har Moto G6 Plus mycket att erbjuda. Exakt vad det innebär kommer förklaras i vår detaljerade recension.

Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Moto Serie)
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 508
Minne
4096 MB 
Skärm
5.9 tum 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixlar 409 PPI, kapacitiv, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 52 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD (upp till 128 GB), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: gyroskop, närhetssensor, magnetometer, ultraljud
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/EDGE (850/900/1800/1900 MHz) UMTS/HSPA+ (850/900/1900/2100 MHz) 4G LTE (Kat. 13 DL/5 UL) (1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8 x 160 x 75.5
Batteri
3200 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix + 5 MPix ƒ/1.7 bländare
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: 1 högtalare på framsidan, Tangentbord: på skärmen, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, skyddsfodral i silikon, SIM-verktyg, 15 watts USB-nätadapter, USB Typ C-kabel, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR huvud: 0.445 W/kg, SAR kropp: 1.407 W/kg, fanless
Vikt
167 g, Strömförsörjning: 78 g

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
394 MBit/s ∼100% +27%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
310 MBit/s ∼79%
Sony Xperia XA2
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s ∼78% 0%
Nokia 6 2018
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
289 MBit/s ∼73% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (30.5 - 939, n=243)
189 MBit/s ∼48% -39%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s ∼31% -61%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 MBit/s ∼100% +105%
Nokia 6 2018
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
345 MBit/s ∼54% +11%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
311 MBit/s ∼49%
Sony Xperia XA2
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
289 MBit/s ∼45% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 703, n=243)
185 MBit/s ∼29% -41%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
108 MBit/s ∼17% -65%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Motorola Moto G6 Plus

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
702
cd/m²
735
cd/m²
718
cd/m²
717
cd/m²
761
cd/m²
757
cd/m²
687
cd/m²
744
cd/m²
684
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 761 cd/m² Medel: 722.8 cd/m² Minimum: 5.44 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 761 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1103:1 (Svärta: 0.69 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
92.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Sony Xperia XA2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Nokia 6 2018
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
HTC U11
Super LCD5, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
-29%
-71%
-85%
-6%
Brightness middle
761
512
-33%
513
-33%
417
-45%
482
-37%
Brightness
723
500
-31%
506
-30%
421
-42%
472
-35%
Brightness Distribution
90
90
0%
93
3%
88
-2%
90
0%
Black Level *
0.69
0.35
49%
0.42
39%
0.61
12%
0.33
52%
Contrast
1103
1463
33%
1221
11%
684
-38%
1461
32%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.4
4.6
-92%
5
-108%
6.1
-154%
3.2
-33%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.2
7.6
-46%
11.4
-119%
11.2
-115%
5.4
-4%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.8
3.8
-111%
7.8
-333%
7.1
-294%
2.2
-22%
Gamma
2.21 109%
2.11 114%
2.2 109%
2.16 111%
2.22 108%
CCT
6312 103%
6952 93%
7964 82%
8362 78%
6581 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2336 Hz ≤ 6 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2336 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 6 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2336 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8895 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
19.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.4 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.4 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
71635 Points ∼41%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
63746 Points ∼36% -11%
Sony Xperia XA2
71552 Points ∼41% 0%
Nokia 6 2018
72580 Points ∼41% +1%
HTC U11
175032 Points ∼100% +144%
Motorola Moto G6
59454 Points ∼34% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (68282 - 73617, n=7)
71179 Points ∼41% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 230642, n=336)
70824 Points ∼40% -1%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
90347 Points ∼88%
Sony Xperia XA2
89228 Points ∼86% -1%
Nokia 6 2018
90435 Points ∼88% 0%
Motorola Moto G6
71352 Points ∼69% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (87300 - 90435, n=5)
89332 Points ∼87% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 290397, n=113)
103239 Points ∼100% +14%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
4875 Points ∼71%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
5035 Points ∼74% +3%
Sony Xperia XA2
5006 Points ∼73% +3%
Nokia 6 2018
4719 Points ∼69% -3%
HTC U11
6828 Points ∼100% +40%
Motorola Moto G6
4552 Points ∼67% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4719 - 5085, n=7)
4923 Points ∼72% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3138 - 8601, n=201)
4453 Points ∼65% -9%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5712 Points ∼69%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
5656 Points ∼68% -1%
Sony Xperia XA2
5844 Points ∼70% +2%
Nokia 6 2018
5484 Points ∼66% -4%
HTC U11
8295 Points ∼100% +45%
Motorola Moto G6
5321 Points ∼64% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5083 - 6264, n=7)
5732 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2516 - 10264, n=365)
4677 Points ∼56% -18%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
925 Points ∼76%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
679 Points ∼56% -27%
Sony Xperia XA2
921 Points ∼75% 0%
Nokia 6 2018
895 Points ∼73% -3%
HTC U11
1221 Points ∼100% +32%
Motorola Moto G6
688 Points ∼56% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (766 - 925, n=7)
867 Points ∼71% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=441)
672 Points ∼55% -27%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1523 Points ∼25%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
986 Points ∼16% -35%
Sony Xperia XA2
1500 Points ∼25% -2%
Nokia 6 2018
1520 Points ∼25% 0%
HTC U11
5976 Points ∼100% +292%
Motorola Moto G6
965 Points ∼16% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1492 - 1523, n=7)
1509 Points ∼25% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=441)
1505 Points ∼25% -1%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1213 Points ∼58%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
584 Points ∼28% -52%
Sony Xperia XA2
1328 Points ∼64% +9%
Nokia 6 2018
1161 Points ∼56% -4%
HTC U11
2085 Points ∼100% +72%
Motorola Moto G6
770 Points ∼37% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (838 - 1405, n=7)
1236 Points ∼59% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=441)
1124 Points ∼54% -7%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3249 Points ∼58%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
2914 Points ∼52% -10%
Sony Xperia XA2
3256 Points ∼58% 0%
Nokia 6 2018
3237 Points ∼58% 0%
HTC U11
5570 Points ∼100% +71%
Motorola Moto G6
2560 Points ∼46% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (3215 - 3319, n=7)
3263 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=441)
2244 Points ∼40% -31%
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1535 Points ∼51%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
1033 Points ∼34% -33%
Sony Xperia XA2
1563 Points ∼52% +2%
Nokia 6 2018
1504 Points ∼50% -2%
HTC U11
3034 Points ∼100% +98%
Motorola Moto G6
1069 Points ∼35% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1368 - 1563, n=7)
1511 Points ∼50% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=444)
1134 Points ∼37% -26%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3763 Points ∼45%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
2628 Points ∼32% -30%
Nokia 6 2018
3690 Points ∼45% -2%
HTC U11
8281 Points ∼100% +120%
Motorola Moto G6
2777 Points ∼34% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (3690 - 3956, n=6)
3831 Points ∼46% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14362, n=138)
3831 Points ∼46% +2%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
4011 Points ∼62%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
4308 Points ∼67% +7%
Sony Xperia XA2
4170 Points ∼65% +4%
Nokia 6 2018
883 Points ∼14% -78%
HTC U11
6443 Points ∼100% +61%
Motorola Moto G6
3868 Points ∼60% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (883 - 4234, n=7)
3683 Points ∼57% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1131 - 10558, n=185)
3970 Points ∼62% -1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
822 Points ∼20%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
841 Points ∼20% +2%
Sony Xperia XA2
865 Points ∼21% +5%
Nokia 6 2018
4210 Points ∼100% +412%
HTC U11
1906 Points ∼45% +132%
Motorola Moto G6
743 Points ∼18% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (822 - 4210, n=7)
1339 Points ∼32% +63%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4265, n=186)
1175 Points ∼28% +43%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1822 Points ∼64%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
2021 Points ∼71% +11%
Sony Xperia XA2
1631 Points ∼57% -10%
Nokia 6 2018
1738 Points ∼61% -5%
HTC U11
2841 Points ∼100% +56%
Motorola Moto G6
1834 Points ∼65% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1631 - 1822, n=7)
1748 Points ∼62% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (530 - 3669, n=290)
1554 Points ∼55% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
721 Points ∼19%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
379 Points ∼10% -47%
Sony Xperia XA2
709 Points ∼18% -2%
Nokia 6 2018
707 Points ∼18% -2%
HTC U11
3883 Points ∼100% +439%
Motorola Moto G6
363 Points ∼9% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (707 - 729, n=7)
720 Points ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (67 - 5220, n=290)
1056 Points ∼27% +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
833 Points ∼23%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
463 Points ∼13% -44%
Sony Xperia XA2
811 Points ∼23% -3%
Nokia 6 2018
814 Points ∼23% -2%
HTC U11
3590 Points ∼100% +331%
Motorola Moto G6
442 Points ∼12% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (811 - 839, n=7)
829 Points ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (83 - 4732, n=298)
1012 Points ∼28% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1802 Points ∼64%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
2016 Points ∼71% +12%
Sony Xperia XA2
1737 Points ∼61% -4%
Nokia 6 2018
1733 Points ∼61% -4%
HTC U11
2832 Points ∼100% +57%
Motorola Moto G6
1803 Points ∼64% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1698 - 1816, n=7)
1755 Points ∼62% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (524 - 3642, n=321)
1455 Points ∼51% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1258 Points ∼21%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
723 Points ∼12% -43%
Sony Xperia XA2
1251 Points ∼21% -1%
Nokia 6 2018
1249 Points ∼21% -1%
HTC U11
5877 Points ∼100% +367%
Motorola Moto G6
690 Points ∼12% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1249 - 1289, n=7)
1260 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 8312, n=321)
1426 Points ∼24% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
1348 Points ∼28%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
843 Points ∼18% -37%
Sony Xperia XA2
1334 Points ∼28% -1%
Nokia 6 2018
1332 Points ∼28% -1%
HTC U11
4744 Points ∼100% +252%
Motorola Moto G6
800 Points ∼17% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1332 - 1374, n=7)
1344 Points ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 6378, n=329)
1227 Points ∼26% -9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
12845 Points ∼64%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
15860 Points ∼79% +23%
Sony Xperia XA2
13112 Points ∼65% +2%
Nokia 6 2018
13196 Points ∼66% +3%
HTC U11
20140 Points ∼100% +57%
Motorola Moto G6
13997 Points ∼69% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (12845 - 13196, n=7)
13001 Points ∼65% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (5462 - 36494, n=476)
12164 Points ∼60% -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
18449 Points ∼33%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
13225 Points ∼24% -28%
Sony Xperia XA2
18534 Points ∼33% 0%
Nokia 6 2018
18572 Points ∼33% +1%
HTC U11
55725 Points ∼100% +202%
Motorola Moto G6
12441 Points ∼22% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (18355 - 18572, n=7)
18470 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=476)
15585 Points ∼28% -16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
16818 Points ∼42%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
13732 Points ∼34% -18%
Sony Xperia XA2
16974 Points ∼42% +1%
Nokia 6 2018
17030 Points ∼43% +1%
HTC U11
40014 Points ∼100% +138%
Motorola Moto G6
12756 Points ∼32% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (16767 - 17030, n=7)
16891 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=477)
13472 Points ∼34% -20%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
30 fps ∼33%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
23 fps ∼25% -23%
Sony Xperia XA2
30 fps ∼33% 0%
Nokia 6 2018
30 fps ∼33% 0%
HTC U11
91 fps ∼100% +203%
Motorola Moto G6
22 fps ∼24% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (29 - 30, n=7)
29.9 fps ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=502)
27 fps ∼30% -10%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
28 fps ∼48%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
19 fps ∼33% -32%
Sony Xperia XA2
31 fps ∼53% +11%
Nokia 6 2018
31 fps ∼53% +11%
HTC U11
58 fps ∼100% +107%
Motorola Moto G6
20 fps ∼34% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (28 - 31, n=7)
30 fps ∼52% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=505)
23.5 fps ∼41% -16%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
14 fps ∼27%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
9.8 fps ∼19% -30%
Sony Xperia XA2
14 fps ∼27% 0%
Nokia 6 2018
14 fps ∼27% 0%
HTC U11
51 fps ∼100% +264%
Motorola Moto G6
9.4 fps ∼18% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (14 - 14, n=7)
14 fps ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=425)
14.4 fps ∼28% +3%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
13 fps ∼45%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
10 fps ∼34% -23%
Sony Xperia XA2
15 fps ∼52% +15%
Nokia 6 2018
15 fps ∼52% +15%
HTC U11
29 fps ∼100% +123%
Motorola Moto G6
8.9 fps ∼31% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 15, n=7)
14.4 fps ∼50% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=427)
14.5 fps ∼50% +12%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
9.8 fps ∼30%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
6.4 fps ∼19% -35%
Sony Xperia XA2
9.7 fps ∼29% -1%
Nokia 6 2018
9.8 fps ∼30% 0%
HTC U11
33 fps ∼100% +237%
Motorola Moto G6
6.1 fps ∼18% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 9.8, n=7)
9.07 fps ∼27% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=288)
12.5 fps ∼38% +28%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
9.4 fps ∼63%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
6.9 fps ∼46% -27%
Sony Xperia XA2
10 fps ∼67% +6%
Nokia 6 2018
10 fps ∼67% +6%
HTC U11
15 fps ∼100% +60%
Motorola Moto G6
5.8 fps ∼39% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (9.4 - 11, n=7)
10.1 fps ∼67% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (2.5 - 110, n=290)
12.6 fps ∼84% +34%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5.6 fps ∼23%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
3.5 fps ∼15% -37%
Sony Xperia XA2
5.5 fps ∼23% -2%
Nokia 6 2018
5.6 fps ∼23% 0%
HTC U11
24 fps ∼100% +329%
Motorola Moto G6
3.4 fps ∼14% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 5.6, n=7)
5.47 fps ∼23% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.76 - 35, n=219)
8.51 fps ∼35% +52%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
5.3 fps ∼41%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
3.8 fps ∼29% -28%
Sony Xperia XA2
6 fps ∼46% +13%
Nokia 6 2018
5.9 fps ∼45% +11%
HTC U11
13 fps ∼100% +145%
Motorola Moto G6
3.3 fps ∼25% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 6, n=7)
5.66 fps ∼44% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 50, n=222)
7.82 fps ∼60% +48%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
HTC U11
36.58 fps ∼100%
Motorola Moto G6
5.38 fps ∼15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
9.81 fps ∼27%
Average of class Smartphone (1.06 - 38.7, n=72)
12.1 fps ∼33%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
HTC U11
812 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G6
129 Points ∼16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
190 Points ∼23%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 1702, n=62)
573 Points ∼71%

Legend

 
Motorola Moto G6 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G5s Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Motorola Moto G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
69.51 Points ∼100% +149%
Average of class Smartphone (11.4 - 224, n=360)
33.7 Points ∼48% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=7)
28.5 Points ∼41% +2%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
28.167 Points ∼41% +1%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
27.971 Points ∼40%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
27.368 Points ∼39% -2%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62)
26.407 Points ∼38% -6%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
22.556 Points ∼32% -19%
Octane V2 - Total Score
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
11781 Points ∼100% +135%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
5011 Points ∼43%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=496)
5011 Points ∼43% 0%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
4993 Points ∼42% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5052, n=7)
4881 Points ∼41% -3%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
4771 Points ∼40% -5%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62)
4456 Points ∼38% -11%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
3943 Points ∼33% -21%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=515)
11883 ms * ∼100% -21%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
11751.4 ms * ∼99% -20%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
10235.7 ms * ∼86% -4%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
9922.7 ms * ∼84% -1%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
9796.9 ms * ∼82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10236, n=7)
9585 ms * ∼81% +2%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62)
9360.9 ms * ∼79% +4%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
2760.3 ms * ∼23% +72%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
162 Points ∼100% +50%
Nokia 6 2018
117 Points ∼72% +8%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66)
108 Points ∼67%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
106 Points ∼65% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (86 - 117, n=7)
103 Points ∼64% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=246)
99.4 Points ∼61% -8%
Motorola Moto G6 (Chrome 66)
90 Points ∼56% -17%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto G6 PlusMotorola Moto G5s PlusSony Xperia XA2Nokia 6 2018HTC U11Motorola Moto G6Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-26%
-24%
-27%
31%
-10%
-26%
-45%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
58.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
64.75 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
61.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
46.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-26%
61.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
51.9 (19.6 - 74.7, n=49)
-16%
43.8 (6.38 - 87.1, n=270)
-30%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
86.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
83.42 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
68.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-18%
75.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-10%
70.2 (21.1 - 86.9, n=49)
-16%
62.1 (10.8 - 96.5, n=270)
-26%
Random Write 4KB
62.76
44.89
-28%
13.82
-78%
15.3
-76%
79.97
27%
59.91
-5%
15.4 (3.4 - 71.1, n=57)
-75%
13.5 (0.14 - 164, n=549)
-78%
Random Read 4KB
58.39
37.94
-35%
43.07
-26%
38.78
-34%
91.45
57%
69.91
20%
48.1 (11.4 - 149, n=57)
-18%
34.5 (1.59 - 173, n=549)
-41%
Sequential Write 256KB
216.09
75.7
-65%
127.38
-41%
118.32
-45%
206.41
-4%
117.19
-46%
160 (40 - 216, n=57)
-26%
71.7 (2.99 - 228, n=549)
-67%
Sequential Read 256KB
286.64
237.44
-17%
271.46
-5%
272.59
-5%
717.33
150%
238.23
-17%
266 (115 - 704, n=57)
-7%
211 (12.1 - 832, n=549)
-26%
Temple Run 2
 InställningarVärde
 default60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Dead Trigger 2
 InställningarVärde
 high30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Hög belastning
 31.8 °C32.8 °C35.5 °C 
 31.6 °C32.4 °C35.5 °C 
 30.8 °C32 °C36 °C 
Max: 36 °C
Medel: 33.2 °C
31.4 °C31.8 °C31.1 °C
31.7 °C32.2 °C32.1 °C
31.7 °C31.6 °C31.8 °C
Max: 32.2 °C
Medel: 31.7 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  28 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.239.22532.937.43137.2384031.739.85039.639.96328.335.78027.32910026.931.712526.732.41602441.620020.948.925020.95431519.554.740018.563.350017.564.763017.567.380015.768.3100015.873.6125016.675.2160015.873.8200015.472.4250015.570.231501671.7400015.87750001677.5630016.378.3800016.372.81000016.276.21250016.471.11600016.460.5SPL28.686.3N1.167median 16.4Motorola Moto G6 Plusmedian 70.2Delta2.19.635.245.832.946.537.232.231.738.439.639.728.332.227.330.926.929.726.732.52433.620.939.120.947.319.551.118.559.217.568.517.566.715.768.515.872.916.673.615.87515.476.815.578.51676.715.876.41676.116.375.516.375.516.268.616.463.616.452.128.687.21.167.9median 16.4Nokia 6 2018median 68.52.112.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G6 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Nokia 6 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.11 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.5 / 1.78 / 1.81 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.3 / 5.14 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2
3300 mAh
Nokia 6 2018
3000 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto G6
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-14%
10%
-1%
-30%
2%
-11%
-21%
Idle Minimum *
0.5
0.83
-66%
0.39
22%
0.67
-34%
0.73
-46%
0.6
-20%
0.636 (0.39 - 0.84, n=7)
-27%
0.866 (0.2 - 3.4, n=576)
-73%
Idle Average *
1.78
1.67
6%
1.61
10%
1.76
1%
1.96
-10%
1.81
-2%
1.884 (1.51 - 2.31, n=7)
-6%
1.697 (0.6 - 6.2, n=575)
5%
Idle Maximum *
1.81
1.85
-2%
1.62
10%
1.78
2%
1.98
-9%
1.86
-3%
1.919 (1.57 - 2.33, n=7)
-6%
1.945 (0.74 - 6.6, n=576)
-7%
Load Average *
3.3
3.47
-5%
3.12
5%
2.82
15%
4.82
-46%
2.78
16%
3.65 (2.82 - 4.76, n=7)
-11%
3.97 (0.8 - 10.8, n=570)
-20%
Load Maximum *
5.14
5.41
-5%
4.92
4%
4.56
11%
7.15
-39%
4.04
21%
5.43 (4.56 - 6.73, n=7)
-6%
5.6 (1.2 - 14.2, n=570)
-9%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
30tim 46min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 66)
11tim 42min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9tim 02min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
6tim 44min
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s Plus
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2
3300 mAh
Nokia 6 2018
3000 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto G6
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
8%
19%
12%
-27%
-16%
Reader / Idle
1846
1496
-19%
2503
36%
1833
-1%
1250
-32%
1170
-37%
H.264
542
766
41%
675
25%
498
-8%
600
11%
WiFi v1.3
702
974
39%
886
26%
942
34%
560
-20%
553
-21%
Load
404
419
4%
298
-26%
362
-10%
212
-48%
338
-16%

För

+ ljusstark skärm
+ dual-SIM plus microSD är möjligt
+ bra kamera
+ bra GPS

Emot

- halt glas på baksidan
- kort WiFi-räckvidd
Recenseras: Motorola Moto G6 Plus. Recensionsenhet från Motorola Germany.
Recenseras: Motorola Moto G6 Plus. Recensionsenhet från Motorola Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Moto G6 Plus är kulmen av den aktuella Moto G6-serien från Motorola. På grund av det står hårdvaran ut kraftigt jämfört med dom andra G6-modellerna. I jämförelse med andra telefoner för runt 3.000 kronor så är det dock få områden där G6 Plus står ut, i huvudsak gäller det kameran och dom extra funktionerna som kommer av Moto-mjukvaran. Dom rena prestandavärdena är tyvärr inte tillräckliga för att försätta konkurrenterna i en besvärlig situation.

Motorola erbjuder en kraftfull mittenskikts-telefon med sin Moto G6 Plus. Men den tyngs inte bara ner av externa rivaler utan även av bra alternativ från Motorolas egna led.

Den som köper G6 Plus kommer få en smartphone som definitivt lever upp till förväntningarna på en mittenskikts-enhet. Budgetmedvetna köpare kanske skulle klara sig bättre med Moto G5s. Om den sämre kameran inte är särskilt viktig så är den telefonens prestanda nästan samma som den efterföljande modellens. Dessutom erbjuder andra tillverkare också kraftfulla telefoner för runt 3.000 kronor. I slutändan är det personlig preferens som kommer vara den avgörande faktorn för vilket enhet man bör välja.

Motorola Moto G6 Plus - 06/04/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Design
91%
Tangentbord
69 / 75 → 92%
Mus
92%
Anslutningar
45 / 60 → 75%
Vikt
91%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
89%
Spelprestanda
42 / 63 → 66%
Programprestanda
54 / 70 → 77%
Temperatur
92%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
71 / 91 → 78%
Camera
72%
Medel
77%
86%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Motorola Moto G6 Plus Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Mike Wobker, 2018-06- 8 (Update: 2018-06- 8)