Notebookcheck

Test: Nokia 1 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Wimmer (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 05/29/2018

Lilla nummer 1. Nokia 1 är instegsmodellen till smartphone-världen: under 1 000 kronor, ett litet format och till och med ett utbytbart batteri. I den här recensionen får du reda på om Nokia 1 är tillräckligt bra för vardaglig användning.

Nokia 1
Processor
Mediatek MT6737
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Minne
1024 MB 
Skärm
4.5 tum 16:9, 854 x 480 pixlar 218 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
8 GB eMMC Flash, 8 GB 
, 5.2 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 128 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Närhetssensor, FM-Radio
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.5 x 133.6 x 67.8
Batteri
8.2 Wh, 2150 mAh Litiumjon, removeable, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 9 tim, Standby 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 360 tim
Operativsystem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix Kontrast-autofokus (AF), LED-blixt, Video i upp till 720p/30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Monohögtalare på enhetens baksida, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Laddare, USB-kabel, Hörlurar, 24 Månader Garanti, Bandbredd Nerladdning/Uppladdning: 150 Mbps / 50 Mbps LTE; IP52-certifierad, SAR-värde: 0.66 W/kg (Huvud), 1.2 W/kg (Kropp), fanless
Vikt
131 g, Strömförsörjning: 40 g
Pris
100 Kr

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.7 - 939, n=211)
201 MBit/s ∼100% +309%
Nokia 2
Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 8 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 MBit/s ∼28% +13%
Gigaset GS170
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.4 MBit/s ∼25% +1%
Nokia 1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 8 GB eMMC Flash
49.1 MBit/s ∼24%
Lenovo Moto C
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
43.7 MBit/s ∼22% -11%
Lenovo B
Mali-T720, MT6735M, 8 GB eMMC Flash
39.5 MBit/s ∼20% -20%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.8 - 703, n=211)
194 MBit/s ∼100% +279%
Nokia 2
Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 8 GB eMMC Flash
54.2 MBit/s ∼28% +6%
Nokia 1
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 8 GB eMMC Flash
51.2 MBit/s ∼26%
Gigaset GS170
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.9 MBit/s ∼26% -3%
Lenovo B
Mali-T720, MT6735M, 8 GB eMMC Flash
47.7 MBit/s ∼25% -7%
Lenovo Moto C
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.2 MBit/s ∼24% -8%
GPS test – Garmin Edge 520: Overview
GPS test – Garmin Edge 520: Overview
GPS test – Garmin Edge 520: Route through a wooded area
GPS test – Garmin Edge 520: Route through a wooded area
GPS test – Garmin Edge 520: Route across a bridge
GPS test – Garmin Edge 520: Route across a bridge
GPS test – Nokia 1: Overview
GPS test – Nokia 1: Overview
GPS test – Nokia 1: Route through a wooded area
GPS test – Nokia 1: Route through a wooded area
GPS test – Nokia 1: Route across a bridge
GPS test – Nokia 1: Route across a bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
ColorChecker: The target colour is in the lower half of each area.
ColorChecker: The target colour is in the lower half of each area.
Photograph of our test chart
Photograph of our test chart
Test chart in detail
Test chart in detail
247
cd/m²
234
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
252
cd/m²
256
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
262
cd/m²
249
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 262 cd/m² Medel: 251.4 cd/m² Minimum: 13.3 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 257 cd/m²
Kontrast: 2133:1 (Svärta: 0.12 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.82 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
89.7% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.3
Nokia 1
IPS, 854x480, 4.5
Nokia 2
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Gigaset GS170
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Lenovo Moto C
TFT, 854x480, 5
Lenovo B
TN LED, 854x480, 4.5
Screen
-40%
-60%
-54%
-74%
Brightness middle
256
527
106%
418
63%
364
42%
309
21%
Brightness
251
503
100%
418
67%
355
41%
302
20%
Brightness Distribution
89
91
2%
92
3%
92
3%
96
8%
Black Level *
0.12
0.68
-467%
0.45
-275%
0.31
-158%
0.46
-283%
Contrast
2133
775
-64%
929
-56%
1174
-45%
672
-68%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.82
5.3
-10%
9.7
-101%
10.4
-116%
9.8
-103%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.75
9.2
22%
18.9
-61%
18
-53%
19.7
-68%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.2
5.8
-12%
11.3
-117%
12.7
-144%
11.5
-121%
Gamma
2.3 104%
2.12 113%
2.27 106%
2.04 118%
2.33 103%
CCT
7107 91%
7894 82%
10414 62%
12904 50%
12460 52%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10390 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.7 ms).
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 1
2335 Points ∼52%
Nokia 2
2304 Points ∼51% -1%
Gigaset GS170
2600 Points ∼57% +11%
Lenovo Moto C
2313 Points ∼51% -1%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (2313 - 2768, n=11)
2551 Points ∼56% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (4673 - 8601, n=170)
4525 Points ∼100% +94%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 1
3054 Points ∼65%
Nokia 2
3109 Points ∼66% +2%
Gigaset GS170
3344 Points ∼71% +9%
Lenovo Moto C
2877 Points ∼61% -6%
Lenovo B
2125 Points ∼45% -30%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (2415 - 3624, n=16)
3137 Points ∼67% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1908 - 10264, n=335)
4698 Points ∼100% +54%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 1
571 Points ∼85%
Nokia 2
9 Points ∼1% -98%
Gigaset GS170
558 Points ∼83% -2%
Lenovo Moto C
534 Points ∼79% -6%
Lenovo B
9 Points ∼1% -98%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (9 - 703, n=16)
375 Points ∼56% -34%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=410)
673 Points ∼100% +18%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 1
176 Points ∼12%
Nokia 2
251 Points ∼16% +43%
Gigaset GS170
210 Points ∼14% +19%
Lenovo Moto C
177 Points ∼12% +1%
Lenovo B
145 Points ∼9% -18%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (176 - 384, n=16)
216 Points ∼14% +23%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=410)
1530 Points ∼100% +769%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 1
505 Points ∼45%
Nokia 2
233 Points ∼21% -54%
Gigaset GS170
610 Points ∼55% +21%
Lenovo Moto C
419 Points ∼38% -17%
Lenovo B
311 Points ∼28% -38%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (419 - 942, n=16)
621 Points ∼56% +23%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4423, n=410)
1115 Points ∼100% +121%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 1
859 Points ∼39%
Nokia 2
901 Points ∼41% +5%
Gigaset GS170
1170 Points ∼53% +36%
Lenovo Moto C
883 Points ∼40% +3%
Lenovo B
799 Points ∼36% -7%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (859 - 1394, n=16)
1077 Points ∼49% +25%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=410)
2214 Points ∼100% +158%
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 1
457 Points ∼40%
Nokia 2
149 Points ∼13% -67%
Gigaset GS170
538 Points ∼48% +18%
Lenovo Moto C
432 Points ∼38% -5%
Lenovo B
136 Points ∼12% -70%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (176 - 588, n=16)
403 Points ∼36% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=413)
1131 Points ∼100% +147%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Nokia 1
943 Points ∼24%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (938 - 1065, n=7)
988 Points ∼25% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (773 - 14362, n=108)
3998 Points ∼100% +324%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 1
1252 Points ∼30%
Nokia 2
1118 Points ∼27% -11%
Gigaset GS170
1595 Points ∼39% +27%
Lenovo Moto C
1254 Points ∼31% 0%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (1252 - 1595, n=10)
1470 Points ∼36% +17%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 10558, n=152)
4105 Points ∼100% +228%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 1
492 Points ∼40%
Nokia 2
423 Points ∼34% -14%
Gigaset GS170
581 Points ∼47% +18%
Lenovo Moto C
450 Points ∼37% -9%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (450 - 581, n=10)
534 Points ∼43% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4265, n=153)
1231 Points ∼100% +150%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 1
666 Points ∼43%
Gigaset GS170
772 Points ∼50% +16%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (666 - 946, n=13)
756 Points ∼49% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (585 - 3669, n=260)
1555 Points ∼100% +133%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 1
60 Points ∼5%
Gigaset GS170
74 Points ∼7% +23%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (60 - 220, n=13)
90.2 Points ∼8% +50%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 5212, n=260)
1096 Points ∼100% +1727%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 1
75 Points ∼7%
Gigaset GS170
93 Points ∼9% +24%
Lenovo B
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (75 - 265, n=13)
112 Points ∼11% +49%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 4732, n=268)
1042 Points ∼100% +1289%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 1
663 Points ∼46%
Nokia 2
539 Points ∼37% -19%
Gigaset GS170
781 Points ∼54% +18%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (663 - 781, n=12)
747 Points ∼52% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (581 - 3642, n=290)
1448 Points ∼100% +118%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 1
61 Points ∼4%
Nokia 2
120 Points ∼8% +97%
Gigaset GS170
227 Points ∼16% +272%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (61 - 227, n=12)
131 Points ∼9% +115%
Average of class Smartphone (54 - 8252, n=290)
1460 Points ∼100% +2293%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 1
76 Points ∼6%
Nokia 2
120 Points ∼10% +58%
Gigaset GS170
152 Points ∼12% +100%
Lenovo B
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (76 - 164, n=12)
150 Points ∼12% +97%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 6378, n=298)
1247 Points ∼100% +1541%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 2
7150 Points ∼59%
Gigaset GS170
8178 Points ∼68%
Lenovo Moto C
7209 Points ∼60%
Lenovo B
7072 Points ∼58%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (7209 - 11340, n=16)
8351 Points ∼69%
Average of class Smartphone (7733 - 36494, n=443)
12098 Points ∼100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 2
4150 Points ∼27%
Gigaset GS170
3167 Points ∼20%
Lenovo Moto C
2706 Points ∼17%
Lenovo B
2239 Points ∼14%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (2706 - 6147, n=16)
3364 Points ∼22%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=443)
15622 Points ∼100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 2
4577 Points ∼34%
Gigaset GS170
3666 Points ∼27%
Lenovo Moto C
3142 Points ∼23%
Lenovo B
2640 Points ∼20%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (3142 - 6843, n=16)
3874 Points ∼29%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=444)
13452 Points ∼100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 1
5.1 fps ∼19%
Nokia 2
5.4 fps ∼20% +6%
Gigaset GS170
6 fps ∼22% +18%
Lenovo Moto C
5.1 fps ∼19% 0%
Lenovo B
4.1 fps ∼15% -20%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (5.1 - 10, n=15)
6.12 fps ∼23% +20%
Average of class Smartphone (4.2 - 177, n=469)
27 fps ∼100% +429%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 1
14 fps ∼60%
Nokia 2
9.6 fps ∼41% -31%
Gigaset GS170
11 fps ∼47% -21%
Lenovo Moto C
13 fps ∼56% -7%
Lenovo B
11 fps ∼47% -21%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (6 - 14, n=15)
10.4 fps ∼44% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (7.5 - 120, n=472)
23.4 fps ∼100% +67%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 1
1.9 fps ∼13%
Nokia 2
1.6 fps ∼11% -16%
Gigaset GS170
2.2 fps ∼15% +16%
Lenovo Moto C
1.6 fps ∼11% -16%
Lenovo B
1.5 fps ∼10% -21%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (1.6 - 4.5, n=15)
2.43 fps ∼17% +28%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=394)
14.4 fps ∼100% +658%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 1
8 fps ∼55%
Nokia 2
4.4 fps ∼30% -45%
Gigaset GS170
4.8 fps ∼33% -40%
Lenovo Moto C
7.8 fps ∼54% -2%
Lenovo B
5.5 fps ∼38% -31%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (2.1 - 8, n=15)
4.69 fps ∼32% -41%
Average of class Smartphone (4.4 - 115, n=396)
14.5 fps ∼100% +81%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 1
1.2 fps ∼9%
Gigaset GS170
1.4 fps ∼11% +17%
Lenovo Moto C
5.5 fps ∼43% +358%
Lenovo B
1 fps ∼8% -17%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (1.2 - 5.5, n=15)
1.66 fps ∼13% +38%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=259)
12.8 fps ∼100% +967%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 1
6 fps ∼47%
Gigaset GS170
3.4 fps ∼27% -43%
Lenovo Moto C
1.2 fps ∼9% -80%
Lenovo B
4.2 fps ∼33% -30%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (1.2 - 14, n=15)
4.01 fps ∼31% -33%
Average of class Smartphone (3.3 - 110, n=261)
12.8 fps ∼100% +113%

Legend

 
Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS170 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto C Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo B Mediatek MT6735M, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 224, n=327)
34.7 Points ∼100% +200%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (11.6 - 21.9, n=16)
15.3 Points ∼44% +32%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)
14.342 Points ∼41% +24%
Lenovo B (Chrome 56)
12.64 Points ∼36% +9%
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60)
11.676 Points ∼34% +1%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)
11.607 Points ∼33% 0%
Nokia 1 (Chrome 66)
11.55 Points ∼33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=463)
5019 Points ∼100% +163%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (1730 - 3383, n=16)
2384 Points ∼47% +25%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)
2284 Points ∼46% +20%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)
1948 Points ∼39% +2%
Lenovo B (Chrome 56)
1929 Points ∼38% +1%
Nokia 1 (Chrome 66)
1907 Points ∼38%
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60)
1730 Points ∼34% -9%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60)
19879.3 ms * ∼100% -5%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)
19274.5 ms * ∼97% -2%
Nokia 1 (Chrome 66)
18927 ms * ∼95%
Lenovo B (Chrome 56)
18130 ms * ∼91% +4%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (10615 - 30114, n=16)
16902 ms * ∼85% +11%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)
16722.7 ms * ∼84% +12%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=482)
11875 ms * ∼60% +37%

* ... smaller is better

Nokia 1Nokia 2Gigaset GS170Lenovo Moto CLenovo BAverage 8 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-21%
-8%
-9%
-59%
-44%
27%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
21.34 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10.7
16.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
24.3 (12.7 - 61.2, n=17)
42.7 (8.29 - 87.1, n=240)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
37.41 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13.5
24.16 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
37.7 (16.3 - 81.9, n=17)
61 (13.5 - 96.5, n=240)
Random Write 4KB
9.1
8.1
-11%
10.45
15%
10.9
20%
4.2
-54%
5.07 (1.08 - 14, n=47)
-44%
13.2 (0.14 - 164, n=516)
45%
Random Read 4KB
25.7
17.44
-32%
18.34
-29%
18.37
-29%
12.4
-52%
17 (8 - 27.3, n=47)
-34%
33.6 (1.59 - 173, n=516)
31%
Sequential Write 256KB
51.8
50.77
-2%
44.79
-14%
44.55
-14%
8.1
-84%
21 (6.22 - 51.8, n=47)
-59%
69 (2.99 - 216, n=516)
33%
Sequential Read 256KB
208.3
131.15
-37%
197.86
-5%
179.28
-14%
115.6
-45%
124 (38.1 - 208, n=47)
-40%
207 (12.1 - 832, n=516)
-1%
Hög belastning
 33.3 °C28.9 °C27.5 °C 
 34.3 °C28.8 °C27.6 °C 
 32.7 °C28.5 °C27.6 °C 
Max: 34.3 °C
Medel: 29.9 °C
28 °C28.9 °C36 °C
28.3 °C29.2 °C35.6 °C
27.7 °C29.3 °C33.7 °C
Max: 36 °C
Medel: 30.7 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  44 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203039.62531.643.73132424034.947.15040.355.96328.8538028.149.81002741.512522.54016021.438.520021.232.425020.133.631518.440.140018.146.550019.950.463016.36180016.566100015.969.812501669160015.569.2200015.370.3250015.168315014.966.9400015.168.7500015.164.4630015.163.9800015.167.81000015.265.11250015.258.91600015.255.7SPL7328.179.4N28.61.143.1median 15.9Nokia 1median 63.9Delta1.91128.629.524.922.424.625.726.42330.831.723.623.420.222.119.922.817.619.819.128.819.128.617.434.716.941.616.847.815.153.916.560.915.668.91574.415.574.515.374.215.772.115.570.515.574.115.473.215.874.1167715.873.216.16116.157.117.36527.984.9158.7median 16Nokia 2median 650.616.1hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia 1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Nokia 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.5 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.5 / 2 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.5 / 4.3 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nokia 1
2150 mAh
Nokia 2
4100 mAh
Gigaset GS170
2500 mAh
Lenovo Moto C
2350 mAh
Lenovo B
2000 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6737
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
13%
12%
12%
-14%
-9%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.55
39%
0.54
40%
0.64
29%
0.877 (0.54 - 2.2, n=15)
3%
0.848 (0.2 - 3.4, n=543)
6%
Idle Average *
1.5
1.02
32%
1.56
-4%
0.96
36%
1.994 (1.35 - 3.4, n=15)
-33%
1.686 (0.6 - 6.2, n=542)
-12%
Idle Maximum *
2
1.09
45%
1.6
20%
1.33
33%
2.12 (1.39 - 3.5, n=15)
-6%
1.914 (0.74 - 6.6, n=543)
4%
Load Average *
3.5
4.48
-28%
3.18
9%
4.59
-31%
4.13 (2.18 - 6.51, n=15)
-18%
3.96 (0.8 - 10.8, n=537)
-13%
Load Maximum *
4.3
5.32
-24%
4.42
-3%
4.63
-8%
4.94 (3.61 - 6.96, n=15)
-15%
5.57 (1.2 - 14.2, n=537)
-30%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
9tim 12min
Nokia 1
2150 mAh
Nokia 2
4100 mAh
Gigaset GS170
2500 mAh
Lenovo Moto C
2350 mAh
Lenovo B
2000 mAh
Battery Runtime
52%
-20%
-6%
-20%
Reader / Idle
1159
WiFi v1.3
552
840
52%
442
-20%
517
-6%
442
-20%
Load
278
H.264
529

För

+ löstagbart batteri
+ lång batteritid
+ bakstycket går att byta ut
+ lågt pris
+ slimmat OS
+ många LTE-band
+ hyfsad GPS
+ hög kontrast och skärm med exakta färger
+ Dual-SIM
+ dedikerad microSD-kortplats

Emot

- problem med dataöverföring till PC
- inte alla microSD-kort är kompatibla
- frekvent märkbar ryckighet
- en viss fördröjd reaktion på inmatning
Nokia 1 recenseras. Testenhet från notebooksbilliger.de
Nokia 1 recenseras. Testenhet från notebooksbilliger.de

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Vad kan man förvänta sig från en smartphone som kostar under 1 000 kronor? Nokia 1 erbjuder inte prestanda i världsklass, men Nokia har byggt en telefon som klarar sig bra för sitt pris. Nokia 1 är för den som har låga krav på sin smartphone. I gengäld får man en smartphone med många positiva aspekter. Nokia 1 har en skaplig skärm med ett imponerande kontrastförhållande och bra färgnoggrannhet. Dess GPS är exakt, högtalarna låter bra och kamerorna är dugliga, även om dom presterar dålig vid låg belysning.

Sporadiskt lagg och ryckighet är irriterande och kommer ta ett tag att vänja sig vid. Men den nivån av prestanda kan man förvänta sig av en smartphone för under 1 000 kronor. Bra batteritid och ett utbytbart batteri kompenserar till viss del för den låga prestandan.

Nokia 1 är en skaplig budget-smartphone som får ut mesta möjliga av sina begränsade resurser. Dess löstagbara batteri, bra skärm och utbytbara skal imponerade på oss.

Den begränsade mängden intern lagring och RAM uppvägs av Android Oreo (Go Edition) som ger användaren mer lagringsutrymme och minne än traditionella Android. Det kan finnas problem med att utbyta information med en dator som du borde känna till. På den här prisnivån kommer det alltid att finnas kompromisser, men detta är ändå frustrerande. Nokia 1 är bara ca 200 kronor billigare men erbjuder mycket av vad Nokia 2 gör, om än med en mindre skärm och lägre upplöst optik.

Nokia 1 - 05/18/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Design
68%
Tangentbord
63 / 75 → 84%
Mus
74%
Anslutningar
33 / 60 → 55%
Vikt
94%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
81%
Spelprestanda
5 / 63 → 7%
Programprestanda
27 / 70 → 39%
Temperatur
93%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
53 / 91 → 58%
Camera
46%
Medel
64%
75%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Nokia 1 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Florian Wimmer, 2018-05-29 (Update: 2018-05-29)