Notebookcheck

Test: Samsung Galaxy S10 5G - En superladdad S10 med en toppmodern nyhet

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 07/31/2019

Först! Samsung utannonserade Galaxy S10 5G på MWC 19, men det har tagit lite tid för den att komma till Europa. Den är större, har fler kameror och har ett större batteri än sina S10-syskon, men några saker har också uteslutits. Samsung har heller inte lyckats bli av med de problem som resten av S10-serien lider av. Läs vidare i den här detaljerade recensionen för att få reda på mer.

Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Galaxy S Serie)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 9820
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G76 MP12
Minne
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4x, 2,093 MHz
Skärm
6.7 tum 19:9, 3040 x 1440 pixlar 502 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, 10 punkters multitouch, Dual Edge Dynamic AMOLED, OLED, glansig: ja, HDR
Hårddisk
256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 226.1 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning och USB Typ C, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyrosensor, Geomagnetisk sensor, Hall-sensor, Hjärtfrekvens-sensor, Närhetssensor, MST, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo, Ant+, Samsung DeX
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, Samsung Exynos 5100 5G Modem: GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+: 850, 900, 1,880, 1,900, 2,010, 2,100, AWS. LTE Cat. 20: Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 66. 5G: N78., LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.9 x 162.6 x 77.1
Batteri
17.33 Wh, 4500 mAh Litiumjon, 3.85 V
Operativsystem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Dual-pixel autofokus, 77°, f/1.5 och f/2.4, 1/2.55", 1.4 μm, OIS). 12 MPix teleobjektiv, 2x förstoring, PDAF, 45°, f/2.4, 1/3.6", OIS. 16 MPix ultravidvinkelslins, fixfokus, 123°, f/2.2, 1/3.1". ToF-kamera (f/1.2, 1/6.0". UHD-video
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (Dual-pixel autofokus, 80°, f/1.9, 1/3.24". ToF-kamera (f/1.6, 1/6.0"); Camera2 API: Fullständigt
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, One UI 1.1, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: Kropp – 1.55 W/kg, Huvud - 0.264 W/kg. VoLTE, VoWiFi, IP68-certifiering, Bixby, fanless
Vikt
198 g
Pris
1199 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

174.6 mm 85.4 mm 8.2 mm 232 g162.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.8 mm 206 g162.6 mm 77.1 mm 7.9 mm 198 g159.2 mm 73.4 mm 7.9 mm 178 g157.6 mm 74.1 mm 7.8 mm 198 g157.5 mm 77.4 mm 7.7 mm 208 g155.3 mm 76.6 mm 7.99 mm 181 g
Den vanliga DeX-hemskärmen
Den vanliga DeX-hemskärmen
Multi-tasking med DeX
Multi-tasking med DeX
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (min: 561, max: 684) MBit/s ∼100% +12%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
624 MBit/s ∼99% +10%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
613 (min: 284, max: 694) MBit/s ∼97% +8%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
578 (min: 474, max: 617) MBit/s ∼91% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
567 (min: 371, max: 667) MBit/s ∼90%
Huawei Mate 20 X
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
566 (min: 514, max: 586) MBit/s ∼89% 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
467 (min: 375, max: 519) MBit/s ∼74% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=416)
224 MBit/s ∼35% -60%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 20 X
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (min: 564, max: 663) MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
602 MBit/s ∼95% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
548 (min: 399, max: 599) MBit/s ∼87%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
527 (min: 481, max: 556) MBit/s ∼83% -4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
502 (min: 465, max: 517) MBit/s ∼79% -8%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (min: 438, max: 506) MBit/s ∼74% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
457 (min: 398, max: 508) MBit/s ∼72% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=416)
213 MBit/s ∼34% -61%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø567 (371-667)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø548 (399-599)
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Översikt
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cykeltur runt en sjö
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cykeltur runt en sjö
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Slinga
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 - Slinga
GPS-test: Samsung Galaxy S10 5G – Cykeltur runt en sjö
GPS-test: Samsung Galaxy S10 5G – Cykeltur runt en sjö
GPS-test: Samsung Galaxy S10 5G - Slinga
GPS-test: Samsung Galaxy S10 5G - Slinga
 

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3Scene 4
Foto taget med standardlinsen
Foto taget med standardlinsen
Foto taget med optisk zoom
Foto taget med optisk zoom
Foto taget med ultravidvinkelslinsen
Foto taget med ultravidvinkelslinsen
Foto taget med optisk zoom
Foto av vår testkarta taget med standardkameran
Foto av vår testkarta taget med standardkameran
Testkartan i detalj
ColorChecker Passport: Den nedre halvan av varje färgområde visar referensfärgen
Foto av vår testkarta taget med standardkameran vid 1 lux
710
cd/m²
737
cd/m²
751
cd/m²
719
cd/m²
735
cd/m²
753
cd/m²
725
cd/m²
737
cd/m²
745
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
Dual Edge Dynamic AMOLED
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 753 cd/m² Medel: 734.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.62 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 735 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.9 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.09
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.7
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4
Huawei Mate 20 X
OLED, 2244x1080, 7.2
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
OnePlus 7 Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Apple iPhone Xs Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
LG G8s ThinQ
P-OLED, 2248x1080, 6.2
Screen
0%
11%
-37%
15%
14%
-13%
Brightness middle
735
710
-3%
421
-43%
402
-45%
586
-20%
656
-11%
539
-27%
Brightness
735
721
-2%
418
-43%
399
-46%
584
-21%
659
-10%
556
-24%
Brightness Distribution
94
97
3%
96
2%
92
-2%
97
3%
88
-6%
88
-6%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.9
3.7
5%
1.1
72%
4.1
-5%
1.39
64%
1.7
56%
3.78
3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.9
10.3
6%
2.2
80%
6.5
40%
2.7
75%
2.8
74%
6.95
36%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.4
1.5
-7%
1.4
-0%
3.7
-164%
1.6
-14%
1.7
-21%
2.2
-57%
Gamma
2.09 105%
2.1 105%
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
2.243 98%
1.998 110%
2.274 97%
CCT
6549 99%
6611 98%
6723 97%
7841 83%
6672 97%
6487 100%
6013 108%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9451 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CalMAN: Gråskala – Adaptiv profil (Justerad): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Gråskala – Adaptiv profil (Justerad): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Blandade färger – Adaptiv profil (Justerad): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Blandade färger – Adaptiv profil (Justerad): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Färgrymd – Adaptiv profil (Justerad): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Färgrymd – Adaptiv profil (Justerad): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Färgmättnad – Adaptiv profil (Justerad): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Färgmättnad – Adaptiv profil (Justerad): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Gråskala – Adaptiv profil (Standard): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Gråskala – Adaptiv profil (Standard): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Blandade färger – Adaptiv profil (Standard): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Blandade färger – Adaptiv profil (Standard): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Färgrymd – Adaptiv profil (Standard): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Färgrymd – Adaptiv profil (Standard): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Färgmättnad – Adaptiv profil (Standard): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Färgmättnad – Adaptiv profil (Standard): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Gråskala – Naturlig profil: sRGB färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Gråskala – Naturlig profil: sRGB färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Blandade färger – Naturlig profil: sRGB färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Blandade färger – Naturlig profil: sRGB färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Färgrymd – Naturlig profil: sRGB färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Färgrymd – Naturlig profil: sRGB färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Färgmättnad – Naturlig profil: sRGB färgrymd som mål
CalMAN: Färgmättnad – Naturlig profil: sRGB färgrymd som mål

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.1 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10192 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5759 Points ∼57% -43%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7553 Points ∼74% -26%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7470 Points ∼73% -27%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7442 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10177 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (10128 - 10192, n=4)
10167 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=314)
4571 Points ∼45% -55%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10489 Points ∼93%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9852 Points ∼88% -6%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10765 Points ∼96% +3%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10812 Points ∼96% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11244 Points ∼100% +7%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10274 Points ∼91% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10259 Points ∼91% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (10162 - 10553, n=4)
10366 Points ∼92% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=371)
4595 Points ∼41% -56%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4529 Points ∼95%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3234 Points ∼68% -29%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3476 Points ∼73% -23%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3472 Points ∼73% -23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4774 Points ∼100% +5%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3406 Points ∼71% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4505 Points ∼94% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4499 - 4529, n=4)
4510 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=373)
1371 Points ∼29% -70%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7704 Points ∼77%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7772 Points ∼78% +1%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9664 Points ∼97% +25%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9974 Points ∼100% +29%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9125 Points ∼91% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7812 Points ∼78% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (7595 - 7966, n=4)
7769 Points ∼78% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=367)
5030 Points ∼50% -35%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9557 Points ∼80%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9867 Points ∼83% +3%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11857 Points ∼100% +24%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
11766 Points ∼99% +23%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11890 Points ∼100% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9793 Points ∼82% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (9557 - 10008, n=4)
9777 Points ∼82% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=535)
5512 Points ∼46% -42%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2720 Points ∼82%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3134 Points ∼94% +15%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3317 Points ∼100% +22%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2794 Points ∼84% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2488 Points ∼75% -9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (2488 - 2720, n=2)
2604 Points ∼79% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2149 - 15735, n=51)
2391 Points ∼72% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5565 Points ∼96%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5779 Points ∼100% +4%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5794 Points ∼100% +4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4236 Points ∼73% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5530 Points ∼95% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (5530 - 5565, n=2)
5548 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 14536, n=51)
2471 Points ∼43% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4515 Points ∼91%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4866 Points ∼98% +8%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4969 Points ∼100% +10%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3800 Points ∼76% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4348 Points ∼88% -4%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4348 - 4515, n=2)
4432 Points ∼89% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 14786, n=54)
2134 Points ∼43% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3480 Points ∼79%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2517 Points ∼57% -28%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4235 Points ∼96% +22%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4429 Points ∼100% +27%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2723 Points ∼61% -22%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3309 Points ∼75% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2925 Points ∼66% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (2925 - 3480, n=4)
3123 Points ∼71% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=381)
1834 Points ∼41% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5418 Points ∼76%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4103 Points ∼58% -24%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7083 Points ∼100% +31%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7115 Points ∼100% +31%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4828 Points ∼68% -11%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5184 Points ∼73% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5371 Points ∼75% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (5358 - 5418, n=4)
5379 Points ∼76% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=381)
1612 Points ∼23% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4821 Points ∼77%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3599 Points ∼57% -25%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6162 Points ∼98% +28%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6270 Points ∼100% +30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4121 Points ∼66% -15%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4604 Points ∼73% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4529 Points ∼72% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4529 - 4821, n=4)
4630 Points ∼74% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=384)
1496 Points ∼24% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3513 Points ∼81%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2488 Points ∼57% -29%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4120 Points ∼95% +17%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4352 Points ∼100% +24%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2961 Points ∼68% -16%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3293 Points ∼76% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3087 Points ∼71% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (3077 - 3513, n=3)
3226 Points ∼74% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=396)
1810 Points ∼42% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5307 Points ∼51%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2536 Points ∼24% -52%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10279 Points ∼99% +94%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10420 Points ∼100% +96%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
10374 Points ∼100% +95%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6358 Points ∼61% +20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4449 Points ∼43% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4449 - 5307, n=3)
4881 Points ∼47% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=396)
2198 Points ∼21% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4766 Points ∼60%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2525 Points ∼32% -47%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7716 Points ∼97% +62%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7955 Points ∼100% +67%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
6667 Points ∼84% +40%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5268 Points ∼66% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4052 Points ∼51% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4052 - 4766, n=3)
4380 Points ∼55% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=397)
1868 Points ∼23% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3296 Points ∼81%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3751 Points ∼92% +14%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4093 Points ∼100% +24%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4063 Points ∼99% +23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3027 Points ∼74% -8%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3242 Points ∼79% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2977 Points ∼73% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (2854 - 3296, n=4)
3033 Points ∼74% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=457)
1768 Points ∼43% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5152 Points ∼81%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3528 Points ∼56% -32%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6356 Points ∼100% +23%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6248 Points ∼98% +21%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3726 Points ∼59% -28%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6040 Points ∼95% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5186 Points ∼82% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (5152 - 5206, n=4)
5180 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=459)
1337 Points ∼21% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4579 Points ∼81%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3575 Points ∼63% -22%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5661 Points ∼100% +24%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5581 Points ∼99% +22%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3544 Points ∼63% -23%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5068 Points ∼90% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4452 Points ∼79% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4383 - 4579, n=4)
4473 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=467)
1274 Points ∼23% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3448 Points ∼84%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3816 Points ∼93% +11%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3919 Points ∼96% +14%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4091 Points ∼100% +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2713 Points ∼66% -21%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3505 Points ∼86% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2875 Points ∼70% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (2875 - 3448, n=3)
3076 Points ∼75% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=490)
1677 Points ∼41% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
6058 Points ∼61%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2347 Points ∼24% -61%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9932 Points ∼100% +64%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9845 Points ∼99% +63%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
7055 Points ∼71% +16%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6122 Points ∼62% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5303 Points ∼53% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4507 - 6058, n=3)
5289 Points ∼53% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=490)
1811 Points ∼18% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5186 Points ∼69%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2567 Points ∼34% -51%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7407 Points ∼99% +43%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7501 Points ∼100% +45%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
5205 Points ∼69% 0%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5251 Points ∼70% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4465 Points ∼60% -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4015 - 5186, n=3)
4555 Points ∼61% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=498)
1553 Points ∼21% -70%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32308 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
19993 Points ∼62% -38%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
23877 Points ∼74% -26%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
26936 Points ∼83% -17%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
27717 Points ∼86% -14%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
30972 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32302 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (31297 - 32308, n=4)
32016 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=649)
13706 Points ∼42% -58%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
66990 Points ∼42%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
42579 Points ∼27% -36%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106799 Points ∼67% +59%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
106829 Points ∼67% +59%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
159735 Points ∼100% +138%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
97354 Points ∼61% +45%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
70318 Points ∼44% +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (66990 - 72022, n=4)
70156 Points ∼44% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7573 - 162695, n=649)
20196 Points ∼13% -70%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
54087 Points ∼70%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
34035 Points ∼44% -37%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60279 Points ∼78% +11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
64389 Points ∼83% +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
77599 Points ∼100% +43%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
65945 Points ∼85% +22%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55740 Points ∼72% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (54087 - 56465, n=4)
55454 Points ∼71% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8513 - 83518, n=650)
16718 Points ∼22% -69%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
97 fps ∼43%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
119 fps ∼53% +23%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
166 fps ∼73% +71%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
166 fps ∼73% +71%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
226 fps ∼100% +133%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
85 fps ∼38% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
96 fps ∼42% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (96 - 143, n=4)
119 fps ∼53% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=678)
35.2 fps ∼16% -64%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
59 fps ∼98%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
58 fps ∼97% -2%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
59 fps ∼98% 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
60 fps ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +2%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
58 fps ∼97% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (58 - 60, n=4)
59.3 fps ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=681)
27.1 fps ∼45% -54%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
85 fps ∼79%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
78 fps ∼73% -8%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼93% +18%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
101 fps ∼94% +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
107 fps ∼100% +26%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
50 fps ∼47% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼63% -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (67 - 85, n=4)
80.5 fps ∼75% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=597)
19.5 fps ∼18% -77%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼90%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
58 fps ∼98% +9%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
55 fps ∼93% +4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼100% +11%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps ∼86% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼90% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (53 - 59, n=4)
54.5 fps ∼92% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=602)
17.9 fps ∼30% -66%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼94%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
53 fps ∼75% -21%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
70 fps ∼99% +4%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
71 fps ∼100% +6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
69.3 fps ∼98% +3%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35 fps ∼49% -48%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼94% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (53 - 67, n=4)
60 fps ∼85% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=458)
16 fps ∼23% -76%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
37 fps ∼63%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
50 fps ∼85% +35%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
57 fps ∼97% +54%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
36 fps ∼61% -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
58.9 fps ∼100% +59%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼61% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
37 fps ∼63% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (30 - 53, n=4)
39.3 fps ∼67% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=461)
15.3 fps ∼26% -59%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼50%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
20 fps ∼62% +25%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25 fps ∼78% +56%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
15 fps ∼47% -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
32.1 fps ∼100% +101%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
14 fps ∼44% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼50% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (16 - 28, n=4)
19 fps ∼59% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=161)
8.94 fps ∼28% -44%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
13 fps ∼76% -24%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
17 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
16 fps ∼94% -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
16.3 fps ∼96% -4%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8.5 fps ∼50% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (16 - 17, n=4)
16.8 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=161)
6.25 fps ∼37% -63%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
26 fps ∼55%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
29 fps ∼62% +12%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼81% +46%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
23 fps ∼49% -12%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
47 fps ∼100% +81%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼47% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
26 fps ∼55% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (16 - 26, n=4)
23.3 fps ∼50% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=163)
13.5 fps ∼29% -48%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
46 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
30 fps ∼65% -35%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼91% -9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
36.8 fps ∼80% -20%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼48% -52%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
46 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (41 - 46, n=4)
44.3 fps ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=162)
14.9 fps ∼32% -68%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
43 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
28 fps ∼65% -35%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼98% -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
40 fps ∼93% -7%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼51% -49%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
43 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (35 - 43, n=4)
41 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=387)
10.8 fps ∼25% -75%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼62%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
28 fps ∼76% +22%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +61%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
21 fps ∼57% -9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
31 fps ∼84% +35%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
21 fps ∼57% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼62% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (23 - 40, n=4)
27.3 fps ∼74% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=391)
9.7 fps ∼26% -58%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
37.3 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32.26 (min: 8.31, max: 85.07) fps ∼86%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (32.3 - 33, n=3)
32.6 fps ∼87%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.53 - 37.4, n=61)
15.1 fps ∼40%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
22.73 fps ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
27.18 (min: 8.36, max: 46.5) fps ∼90%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (27.2 - 36.2, n=3)
30.2 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.91 - 36.2, n=56)
12.1 fps ∼40%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
36.29 fps ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
38.5 (min: 9.69, max: 72.94) fps ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (38.4 - 38.6, n=3)
38.5 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.2 - 38.6, n=56)
14.3 fps ∼37%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
327454 Points ∼88%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
273409 Points ∼74% -17%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
371848 Points ∼100% +14%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
369294 Points ∼99% +13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
302955 Points ∼81% -7%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
321145 Points ∼86% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
333277 Points ∼90% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (327454 - 333277, n=4)
329572 Points ∼89% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=280)
131786 Points ∼35% -60%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4969 Score ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4967 Score ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
 
4967 Score ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (552 - 5025, n=58)
1911 Score ∼38%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1012 Points ∼58%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1239 Points ∼72% +22%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1431 Points ∼83% +41%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
1364 Points ∼79% +35%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
1731 Points ∼100% +71%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1171 Points ∼68% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1383 Points ∼80% +37%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (1012 - 1439, n=4)
1305 Points ∼75% +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=610)
743 Points ∼43% -27%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8981 Points ∼57%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5070 Points ∼32% -44%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9361 Points ∼60% +4%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9421 Points ∼60% +5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
15659 Points ∼100% +74%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8414 Points ∼54% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8401 Points ∼54% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (7361 - 8981, n=4)
8307 Points ∼53% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=610)
1964 Points ∼13% -78%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4502 Points ∼72%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5700 Points ∼91% +27%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6253 Points ∼100% +39%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5243 Points ∼84% +16%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
1815 Points ∼29% -60%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4324 Points ∼69% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4306 Points ∼69% -4%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4306 - 4570, n=4)
4463 Points ∼71% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=610)
1464 Points ∼23% -67%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7793 Points ∼67%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7923 Points ∼68% +2%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8652 Points ∼74% +11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9143 Points ∼78% +17%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11675 Points ∼100% +50%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8718 Points ∼75% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8344 Points ∼71% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (7476 - 8344, n=4)
7861 Points ∼67% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=610)
2880 Points ∼25% -63%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4226 Points ∼81%
Huawei Mate 20 X
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4104 Points ∼79% -3%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5188 Points ∼100% +23%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4982 Points ∼96% +18%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4895 Points ∼94% +16%
LG G8s ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4389 Points ∼85% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4520 Points ∼87% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4226 - 4548, n=4)
4404 Points ∼85% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=614)
1431 Points ∼28% -66%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1421 Points ∼59%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
1425 Points ∼59%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2407 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1928 Points ∼80%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (1927 - 1937, n=3)
1931 Points ∼80%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=102)
709 Points ∼29%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
62.5 Points ∼100% +41%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
53.783 Points ∼86% +21%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
52.718 Points ∼84% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samung Browser 9.2)
44.352 Points ∼71%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (44.1 - 44.4, n=2)
44.2 Points ∼71% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samung Browser 9.0)
44.128 Points ∼71% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (12.9 - 108, n=86)
31.2 Points ∼50% -30%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
66.3 runs/min ∼100% +16%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chome 75)
64.1 runs/min ∼97% +12%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74)
61.5 runs/min ∼93% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)
57 runs/min ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
56 runs/min ∼84% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (54 - 57, n=3)
55.7 runs/min ∼84% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=77)
35.1 runs/min ∼53% -38%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
155 Points ∼100% +35%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
115 Points ∼74% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
115 Points ∼74%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (115 - 115, n=2)
115 Points ∼74% 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
111 Points ∼72% -3%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
107 Points ∼69% -7%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
98 Points ∼63% -15%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)
86 Points ∼55% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=140)
63.8 Points ∼41% -45%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
43114 Points ∼100% +109%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
25640 Points ∼59% +24%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
24730 Points ∼57% +20%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
23830 Points ∼55% +15%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)
21208 Points ∼49% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
20849 Points ∼48% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)
20653 Points ∼48%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (18697 - 20849, n=4)
20121 Points ∼47% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=670)
6339 Points ∼15% -69%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=690)
10753 ms * ∼100% -490%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)
2145.4 ms * ∼20% -18%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
2036 ms * ∼19% -12%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
1965 ms * ∼18% -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1823 - 2240, n=4)
1961 ms * ∼18% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
1856.6 ms * ∼17% -2%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
1851.7 ms * ∼17% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)
1823.2 ms * ∼17%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
603.1 ms * ∼6% +67%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
273.01 Points ∼100% +200%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)
118.27 Points ∼43% +30%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)
94.144 Points ∼34% +4%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)
93.241 Points ∼34% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
91.774 Points ∼34% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)
90.876 Points ∼33%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (84 - 91.8, n=3)
88.9 Points ∼33% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 273, n=511)
39.1 Points ∼14% -57%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy S10 5GHuawei Mate 20 XZTE Axon 10 ProOnePlus 7 ProLG G8s ThinQSamsung Galaxy S10 PlusAverage 256 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
223%
202%
43%
-1%
-1%
81%
-53%
Random Write 4KB
23.79
237.63
899%
189.53
697%
24.8
4%
29.6
24%
22.7
-5%
98.1 (22.1 - 160, n=7)
312%
20.4 (0.14 - 250, n=720)
-14%
Random Read 4KB
134.96
144.44
7%
150.36
11%
174.1
29%
138
2%
135.16
0%
153 (127 - 174, n=7)
13%
45.2 (1.59 - 175, n=720)
-67%
Sequential Write 256KB
246.3
182.7
-26%
503.04
104%
387
57%
182.4
-26%
249.06
1%
245 (228 - 253, n=7)
-1%
92.9 (2.99 - 503, n=720)
-62%
Sequential Read 256KB
815.56
911.88
12%
768.93
-6%
1468
80%
791.1
-3%
811.17
-1%
807 (687 - 873, n=7)
-1%
261 (12.1 - 1468, n=720)
-68%
PUBG Mobile & Arena of Valor
0102030405060Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 0.13.0: Ø37.3 (28-41)
; Arena of Valor; 1.30.2.4: Ø57.2 (48-60)
Hög belastning
 34.2 °C33.2 °C31.2 °C 
 34.2 °C35.2 °C29.7 °C 
 33.8 °C33.2 °C29 °C 
Max: 35.2 °C
Medel: 32.6 °C
25.3 °C31 °C30.5 °C
27.7 °C30.3 °C31.8 °C
27.3 °C30 °C31.4 °C
Max: 31.8 °C
Medel: 29.5 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  25.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.735.32537.130.93128.122.64027.627.75037.533.96322.923.28023.823.810021.323.912519.133.916018.449.120017.949.225017.756.831517.965.640014.662.650015.96463015.26780016.266.810001471.512501575160014.774.8200014.475.6250014.676.6315014.277.1400014.778.6500014.675.3630014.974.7800015.1711000015.163.31250014.8591600015.159.5SPL27.286.7N0.966.9median 15.1median 66.8Delta1.410.731.137.329.230.42622.323.221.531.931.327.421.72921.624.224.818.4341851.817.450.714.456.115.859.716.360.815.461.114.763.516.265.514.77313.871.61474.314.473.914.176.414.674.114.672.714.470.514.469.214.863.715.259.214.758.614.849.726.984.10.955.6median 14.7median 63.51.49.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S10 5GHuawei Mate 20 X
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Mate 20 X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.08 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.66 / 1.82 / 1.83 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 6.11 / 9.81 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
4500 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 X
5000 mAh
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
4000 mAh
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-1%
23%
-13%
7%
-13%
-0%
8%
7%
Idle Minimum *
0.66
0.79
-20%
0.76
-15%
0.9
-36%
1
-52%
1.2
-82%
0.73
-11%
0.65 (0.6 - 0.73, n=4)
2%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=749)
-33%
Idle Average *
1.82
1.72
5%
1.15
37%
1.8
1%
1.4
23%
1.6
12%
1.53
16%
1.455 (1.2 - 1.82, n=4)
20%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=748)
5%
Idle Maximum *
1.83
1.83
-0%
1.18
36%
2.9
-58%
1.7
7%
2
-9%
2.07
-13%
1.675 (1.3 - 2.07, n=4)
8%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=749)
-10%
Load Average *
6.11
5.53
9%
3.95
35%
5.5
10%
4.6
25%
5
18%
6.03
1%
5.88 (5.2 - 6.17, n=4)
4%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=743)
34%
Load Maximum *
9.81
9.85
-0%
7.49
24%
8.2
16%
6.7
32%
10
-2%
9.18
6%
9.44 (8.55 - 10.2, n=4)
4%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=743)
40%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
39tim 00min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Samsung Browser 9.2)
8tim 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17tim 27min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
5tim 27min
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 X
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
LG G8s ThinQ
3550 mAh
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
4000 mAh
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-24%
5%
-15%
-16%
-6%
-8%
Reader / Idle
2340
1560
-33%
1984
-15%
1305
-44%
1689
-28%
1927
-18%
1745
-25%
H.264
1047
921
-12%
986
-6%
801
-23%
753
-28%
1068
2%
802
-23%
WiFi v1.3
533
483
-9%
786
47%
742
39%
693
30%
680
28%
768
44%
Load
327
187
-43%
300
-8%
223
-32%
203
-38%
217
-34%
236
-28%

För

+ utmärkt design
+ lyxiga material
+ imponerande kameror
+ riktigt ljusstark AMOLED-skärm
+ IP68-certifiering
+ 3D-ansiktsigenkänning
+ ultraljudsbaserad fingeravtrycksläsare
+ omvändbar trådlös laddning
+ ultrasnabb trådbunden laddning
+ hörlursanslutning
+ kraftfull SoC

Emot

- ryckig bilduppdatering i krävande spel
- SoC som stryps vid ihållande belastning
- PWM
- saknar aptX HD
- saknar microSD-kortplats
- skräniga högtalare
- batteritiden var en besvikelse
- bara enkel-SIM
- operatörsmärkt
- bloatware
Recension av Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (SM-G977B).
Recension av Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (SM-G977B).

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Det är fler saker än 5G-modemet som får Galaxy S10 5G att stå ut gentemot sina gelikar. Men modemet överskuggar många komponenter som annars hade varit trevliga att se på andra telefoner. Ett exempel är batteriet på 4.500 mAh, som är större än på alla motsvarande aktuella modeller med undantag för batteriet som sitter i Mate 20 X. 4.500 mAh är ett imponerande stort batteri på papperet, men 5G-modemet äter igenom det, vilket ger vår recensionsenhet en batteritid på under 10 timmar av WiFi-användning mellan laddningarna. Dessutom säljer Samsung för tillfället bara en operatörsmärkt version av S10 5G, vilket vi inte uppskattar.

Samsung vägrar dessutom fortfarande att inkludera stöd för aptX HD, och även om Exynos 9820 är en kraftfull SoC så klarar dess ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU inte av att spela krävande spel utan ryckighet. Vi förstår att detta är ett mindre problem, men vi förväntar oss ändå mer av en telefon som kostar 13.000 kronor. Det är också svårt att svälja att den saknar en microSD-kortplats, särskilt med tanke på att Samsung har inkluderat en sådan på alla andra modeller i S10-serien. Högtalarna kommer heller inte vinna några priser.

Samsung Galaxy S10 5G är en stark premiär för den nya mobilstandarden, men ett par krångligheter hindrar den från att överraska oss.

Generellt sett har S10 5G i princip alla funktioner man kan önska av ett modernt flaggskepp. Den gigantiska AMOLED-skärmen är extremt ljusstark med levande och exakt färgåtergivning. Samsung har också gjort ett utmärkt jobb med kamerorna och vi uppskattade att ToF-sensorer ingår. Den ultraljudsbaserade fingeravtrycksläsaren fungerar precis lika bra som den gjorde på S10 och S10+ och det är bra att ha 3D-ansiktsigenkänning som ett alternativ. Det är också trevligt med en 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning.

Galaxy S10 5G är ett utmärkt val om du letar efter en phablet, även om du bortser från möjligheten till 5G. Men den känns riktigt dyr bredvid sina S10-syskon samtidigt som några få men tydliga brister kan få den som är intresserad att istället leta på annat håll.

Samsung Galaxy S10 5G - 07/27/2019 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Design
92%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 90%
Mus
98%
Anslutningar
62 / 60 → 100%
Vikt
88%
Batteri
95%
Skärm
89%
Spelprestanda
68 / 63 → 100%
Programprestanda
79 / 70 → 100%
Temperatur
95%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
91%
Medel
84%
91%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy S10 5G - En superladdad S10 med en toppmodern nyhet
Daniel Schmidt, 2019-07-31 (Update: 2019-07-31)