Notebookcheck

Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 03/17/2019

Galaktisk - 10 år av Samsung Galaxy S. S10+ är bara en av de fem telefoner som den Sydkoranska tillverkaren utannonserade under sin Galaxy UNPACKED-event, men den är för tillfället den största Galaxy S10-modellen som finns att förboka. S10+ har en stor och nästan kantlös Dynamisk AMOLED-skärm vars yta endast avbryts av hålen som innehåller de framåtriktade kamerorna. Det nya flaggskeppet drivs av en snabbare SoC, har fler och bättre kameror och kommer med 1 TB intern lagring. Läs vidare för att få reda på huruvida Samsung har gjort tillräckligt för att skapa en smartphone som är värdig att fira Galaxy S-seriens jubileum med.

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Galaxy S Serie)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 9820
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G76 MP12
Minne
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Skärm
6.4 tum 19:9, 3040 x 1440 pixlar 526 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, 10 punkters multitouch, Curved Dynamic AMOLED, OLED, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 462.5 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm kombinerad anslutning för hörlurar och mikrofon, Kortläsare: Upp till 512 GB microSD-kort; stöd för FAT, FAT32 och exFAT, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyrosensor, Geomagnetisk sensor, Hall-sensor, Hjärtrytm-sensor, Närhetssensor, MST, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo, Ant+, Samsung DeX
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, LTE Cat. 20, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.8 x 157.6 x 74.1
Batteri
15.79 Wh, 4100 mAh Litiumjon, QuickCharge 2.0, AFC, PD 3.0, Trådlös laddning (Qi)
Operativsystem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix , Dual-pixel autofokus, 77 °, f/1.5 och f/2.4, 1.4 μm, OIS. 12 MPix Teleobjektiv, 2x förstoring, PDAF, 45 °, f/2.4, OIS. 16 MPix Ultra-vidvinkel, Fast fokus, 123 °, f/2.2), Ultra HD-video
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix , Dual-pixel autofokus, 80 °, f/1.9. 8 MPix, RGB-djup, Fast fokus, 90 °, f/2.2
Övrigt
Högtalare: Dubbla högtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Laddare, USB-kabel, 2 OTG-adaptrar, AKG-headset, Snabbstartsguide, Säkerhetsinstruktioner, One UI, Galaxy App Store, 24 Månader Garanti, IP68-certifiering, SAR-värden: Kropp - 1.582 W/kg, Huvud - 0.516 W/kg, fanless
Vikt
198 g, Strömförsörjning: 57 g
Pris
1249 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

158 mm 80 mm 11.9 mm 236 g158.1 mm 73.8 mm 8.5 mm 189 g158.7 mm 75.8 mm 7.7 mm 169 g158 mm 76.7 mm 7.9 mm 184 g157.5 mm 74.8 mm 8.2 mm 185 g156.9 mm 72.4 mm 8.6 mm 189 g157.6 mm 74.1 mm 7.8 mm 198 g157.5 mm 77.4 mm 7.7 mm 208 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 MBit/s ∼100% +7%
LG V40 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 (min: 655, max: 698) MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 (min: 315, max: 645) MBit/s ∼94% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (min: 561, max: 684) MBit/s ∼94%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
629 (min: 621, max: 638) MBit/s ∼93% -1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
624 MBit/s ∼92% -1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 (min: 532, max: 642) MBit/s ∼91% -3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 100, max: 534) MBit/s ∼73% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 939, n=396)
219 MBit/s ∼32% -65%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
696 (min: 647, max: 714) MBit/s ∼100% +52%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 289, max: 805) MBit/s ∼95% +45%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 MBit/s ∼93% +42%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
602 MBit/s ∼86% +32%
LG V40 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
554 (min: 492, max: 579) MBit/s ∼80% +21%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
474 (min: 241, max: 497) MBit/s ∼68% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
457 (min: 398, max: 508) MBit/s ∼66%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
456 (min: 429, max: 468) MBit/s ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=396)
210 MBit/s ∼30% -54%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø632 (561-684)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø457 (398-508)
GPS-Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - Översikt
GPS-Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - Översikt
GPS-Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - Kurvor
GPS-Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - Kurvor
GPS-Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - Cirkulationsplats
GPS-Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - Cirkulationsplats
GPS-Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Översikt
GPS-Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Översikt
GPS-Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Kurvor
GPS-Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Kurvor
GPS-Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Cirkulationsplats
GPS-Test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Cirkulationsplats

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2
Foto taget med vidvinkelskameran
Foto taget med den vanliga kameran
Foto taget med vidvinkelskameran
Foto taget med vidvinkelskameran
Foto taget med vidvinkelskameran
Foto taget med den vanliga kameran
Foto taget med teleobjektivet
Foto taget med vidvinkelskameran
Foto taget med teleobjektivet
Foto taget med vidvinkelskameran
Foto taget med vidvinkelskameran
Foto taget med teleobjektivet
Foto av vår testkarta
Foto av vår testkarta
Testkartan i detalj
Foto av testkartan tagen med ultravidinkelslinsen
Foto av testkartan taget med teleobjektivet
715
cd/m²
719
cd/m²
729
cd/m²
726
cd/m²
710
cd/m²
725
cd/m²
732
cd/m²
708
cd/m²
726
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 732 cd/m² Medel: 721.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.58 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 97 %
Mitt på batteriet: 710 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
96.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.3
Apple iPhone Xs Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
Google Pixel 3 XL
AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.3
LG V40 ThinQ
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.4
OnePlus 6T
Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
Screen
4%
13%
15%
-6%
5%
-3%
Brightness middle
710
565
-20%
576
-19%
656
-8%
410
-42%
567
-20%
437
-38%
Brightness
721
571
-21%
582
-19%
659
-9%
413
-43%
559
-22%
442
-39%
Brightness Distribution
97
96
-1%
90
-7%
88
-9%
97
0%
89
-8%
95
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.7
2.3
38%
1.3
65%
1.7
54%
3.16
15%
3.3
11%
2.21
40%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.3
4.8
53%
3.5
66%
2.8
73%
5.5
47%
6.1
41%
4.27
59%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.5
1.9
-27%
1.6
-7%
1.7
-13%
1.7
-13%
1.1
27%
2.1
-40%
Gamma
2.1 105%
2.16 102%
2.18 101%
1.998 110%
2.219 99%
2.46 89%
2.307 95%
CCT
6611 98%
6332 103%
6561 99%
6487 100%
6653 98%
6495 100%
6353 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 235.8 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 235.8 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 235.8 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9533 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.4 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10177 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6202 Points ∼43% -39%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13519 Points ∼94% +33%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8938 Points ∼62% -12%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13341 Points ∼93% +31%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
10876 Points ∼75% +7%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14417 Points ∼100% +42%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (10128 - 10177, n=3)
10158 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=294)
4519 Points ∼31% -56%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10259 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
8963 Points ∼80% -13%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8687 Points ∼77% -15%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
10024 Points ∼89% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11244 Points ∼100% +10%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8995 Points ∼80% -12%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8292 Points ∼74% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8522 Points ∼76% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (10162 - 10553, n=3)
10325 Points ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=348)
4470 Points ∼40% -56%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4505 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3776 Points ∼79% -16%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2397 Points ∼50% -47%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3378 Points ∼71% -25%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4774 Points ∼100% +6%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2384 Points ∼50% -47%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2325 Points ∼49% -48%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2457 Points ∼51% -45%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4499 - 4506, n=3)
4503 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 4824, n=350)
1323 Points ∼28% -71%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7812 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5319 Points ∼58% -32%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8141 Points ∼88% +4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9225 Points ∼100% +18%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8487 Points ∼92% +9%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
9029 Points ∼98% +16%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8178 Points ∼89% +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (7595 - 7966, n=3)
7791 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 10450, n=342)
4921 Points ∼53% -37%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9793 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5822 Points ∼46% -41%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
10361 Points ∼83% +6%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
12535 Points ∼100% +28%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
10590 Points ∼84% +8%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
11180 Points ∼89% +14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9858 Points ∼79% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (9750 - 10008, n=3)
9850 Points ∼79% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4290 - 14439, n=510)
5373 Points ∼43% -45%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2925 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2546 Points ∼58% -13%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2809 Points ∼64% -4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4364 Points ∼100% +49%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2723 Points ∼62% -7%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3681 Points ∼84% +26%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3676 Points ∼84% +26%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2713 Points ∼62% -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (2925 - 3106, n=3)
3004 Points ∼69% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=357)
1811 Points ∼41% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5371 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3792 Points ∼65% -29%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4133 Points ∼70% -23%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4250 Points ∼72% -21%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4828 Points ∼82% -10%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5877 Points ∼100% +9%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5789 Points ∼99% +8%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5651 Points ∼96% +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (5358 - 5371, n=3)
5366 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=357)
1547 Points ∼26% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4529 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3420 Points ∼66% -24%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3741 Points ∼72% -17%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4275 Points ∼82% -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4121 Points ∼79% -9%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5189 Points ∼100% +15%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5133 Points ∼99% +13%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4555 Points ∼88% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4529 - 4620, n=3)
4567 Points ∼88% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=360)
1445 Points ∼28% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3087 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2561 Points ∼58% -17%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2871 Points ∼65% -7%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4407 Points ∼100% +43%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2961 Points ∼67% -4%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3374 Points ∼77% +9%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3280 Points ∼74% +6%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2721 Points ∼62% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (3077 - 3087, n=2)
3082 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=373)
1784 Points ∼40% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4449 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4797 Points ∼46% +8%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6024 Points ∼58% +35%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5854 Points ∼56% +32%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
10374 Points ∼100% +133%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8397 Points ∼81% +89%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8380 Points ∼81% +88%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7609 Points ∼73% +71%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4449 - 4886, n=2)
4668 Points ∼45% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=373)
2132 Points ∼21% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4052 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4018 Points ∼60% -1%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4842 Points ∼73% +19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5456 Points ∼82% +35%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
6667 Points ∼100% +65%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6310 Points ∼95% +56%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
6228 Points ∼93% +54%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5438 Points ∼82% +34%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4052 - 4321, n=2)
4187 Points ∼63% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 7980, n=374)
1815 Points ∼27% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2977 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2469 Points ∼59% -17%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2740 Points ∼66% -8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4183 Points ∼100% +41%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3027 Points ∼72% +2%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3537 Points ∼85% +19%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3605 Points ∼86% +21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3620 Points ∼87% +22%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (2854 - 3005, n=3)
2945 Points ∼70% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4262, n=433)
1740 Points ∼42% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5186 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3582 Points ∼68% -31%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4275 Points ∼82% -18%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4206 Points ∼80% -19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3726 Points ∼71% -28%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5241 Points ∼100% +1%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5089 Points ∼97% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5190 Points ∼99% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (5176 - 5206, n=3)
5189 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=435)
1278 Points ∼24% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4452 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3256 Points ∼69% -27%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3802 Points ∼80% -15%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4201 Points ∼89% -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3544 Points ∼75% -20%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4734 Points ∼100% +6%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
4662 Points ∼98% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4734 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4383 - 4477, n=3)
4437 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=443)
1224 Points ∼26% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2875 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2496 Points ∼60% -13%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2731 Points ∼66% -5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4150 Points ∼100% +44%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2713 Points ∼65% -6%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3483 Points ∼84% +21%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3594 Points ∼87% +25%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2541 Points ∼61% -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (2875 - 2906, n=2)
2891 Points ∼70% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4240, n=467)
1646 Points ∼40% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5303 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4637 Points ∼56% -13%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6439 Points ∼78% +21%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5305 Points ∼64% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
7055 Points ∼85% +33%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8272 Points ∼100% +56%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7780 Points ∼94% +47%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8219 Points ∼99% +55%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4507 - 5303, n=2)
4905 Points ∼59% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=467)
1743 Points ∼21% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4465 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3895 Points ∼61% -13%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4947 Points ∼78% +11%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4996 Points ∼79% +12%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
5205 Points ∼82% +17%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6336 Points ∼100% +42%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
6180 Points ∼98% +38%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5492 Points ∼87% +23%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4015 - 4465, n=2)
4240 Points ∼67% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7673, n=475)
1496 Points ∼24% -66%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32302 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
26226 Points ∼71% -19%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
30418 Points ∼83% -6%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
36755 Points ∼100% +14%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
27717 Points ∼75% -14%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35022 Points ∼95% +8%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
15614 Points ∼42% -52%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
36762 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (31297 - 32302, n=3)
31918 Points ∼87% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8253 - 45072, n=626)
13505 Points ∼37% -58%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
70318 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
46610 Points ∼29% -34%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
79818 Points ∼50% +14%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
67730 Points ∼42% -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
159735 Points ∼100% +127%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
84998 Points ∼53% +21%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
53794 Points ∼34% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
81502 Points ∼51% +16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (70318 - 72022, n=3)
71211 Points ∼45% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3585 - 162695, n=626)
19454 Points ∼12% -72%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55740 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
39745 Points ∼51% -29%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58651 Points ∼76% +5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
57047 Points ∼74% +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
77599 Points ∼100% +39%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
64534 Points ∼83% +16%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
34855 Points ∼45% -37%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
64152 Points ∼83% +15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (55524 - 56465, n=3)
55910 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4164 - 83518, n=627)
16275 Points ∼21% -71%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
96 fps ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
147 fps ∼65% +53%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
105 fps ∼46% +9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
120 fps ∼53% +25%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
226 fps ∼100% +135%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
152 fps ∼67% +58%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
140 fps ∼62% +46%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
150 fps ∼66% +56%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (96 - 143, n=3)
127 fps ∼56% +32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=652)
34 fps ∼15% -65%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
58 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
60 fps ∼98% +3%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼98% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
61 fps ∼100% +5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼98% +3%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼98% +3%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
60 fps ∼98% +3%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼98% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (58 - 60, n=3)
59.3 fps ∼97% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=655)
26.4 fps ∼43% -54%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
74 fps ∼69% +10%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼55% -12%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
73 fps ∼68% +9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
107 fps ∼100% +60%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼55% -12%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
56 fps ∼52% -16%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
71 fps ∼66% +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (67 - 85, n=3)
79 fps ∼74% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=571)
18.6 fps ∼17% -72%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
45 fps ∼76% -15%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
33 fps ∼56% -38%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
42 fps ∼71% -21%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼100% +11%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +11%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
37 fps ∼63% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58 fps ∼98% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (53 - 59, n=3)
55 fps ∼93% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=576)
17.3 fps ∼29% -67%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
47 fps ∼68% -30%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
41 fps ∼59% -39%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
29 fps ∼42% -57%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
69.3 fps ∼100% +3%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼85% -12%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
45 fps ∼65% -33%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58 fps ∼84% -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (53 - 67, n=3)
57.7 fps ∼83% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=433)
15.5 fps ∼22% -77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
37 fps ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
24 fps ∼41% -35%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
21 fps ∼36% -43%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
26 fps ∼44% -30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
58.9 fps ∼100% +59%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
53 fps ∼90% +43%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
25 fps ∼42% -32%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
56 fps ∼95% +51%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (30 - 53, n=3)
40 fps ∼68% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=436)
14.8 fps ∼25% -60%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼50%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
12 fps ∼37% -25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
19 fps ∼59% +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
32.1 fps ∼100% +101%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼69% +38%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
25 fps ∼78% +56%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (16 - 28, n=3)
20 fps ∼62% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=137)
8.81 fps ∼27% -45%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼100%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
12 fps ∼71% -29%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
13 fps ∼76% -24%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
16.3 fps ∼96% -4%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼82% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼82% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (16 - 17, n=3)
16.7 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=137)
6.06 fps ∼36% -64%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
26 fps ∼55%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
16 fps ∼34% -38%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
18 fps ∼38% -31%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
47 fps ∼100% +81%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34 fps ∼72% +31%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
40 fps ∼85% +54%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (16 - 26, n=3)
22.3 fps ∼47% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=138)
13.2 fps ∼28% -49%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
46 fps ∼100%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
30 fps ∼65% -35%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
33 fps ∼72% -28%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
36.8 fps ∼80% -20%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
37 fps ∼80% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
38 fps ∼83% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (41 - 46, n=3)
43.7 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=137)
14.6 fps ∼32% -68%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
43 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
28 fps ∼65% -35%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
26 fps ∼60% -40%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
31 fps ∼72% -28%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
40 fps ∼93% -7%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼81% -19%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
33 fps ∼77% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼81% -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (35 - 43, n=3)
40.3 fps ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=362)
10.4 fps ∼24% -76%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
14 fps ∼38% -39%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13 fps ∼35% -43%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
16 fps ∼43% -30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
31 fps ∼84% +35%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31 fps ∼84% +35%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
18 fps ∼49% -22%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +61%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (23 - 40, n=3)
28.7 fps ∼78% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=366)
9.39 fps ∼25% -59%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32.26 (min: 8.31, max: 85.07) fps ∼91%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
29.12 (min: 9.74, max: 74.17) fps ∼82% -10%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35.34 fps ∼100% +10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (32.3 - 33, n=3)
32.6 fps ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.09 - 651, n=58)
26.5 fps ∼75% -18%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
27.18 (min: 8.36, max: 46.5) fps ∼90%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
16.92 (min: 6.06, max: 28.78) fps ∼56% -38%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
29.68 fps ∼98% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (27.2 - 36.2, n=3)
30.2 fps ∼100% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 606, n=53)
23.6 fps ∼78% -13%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
38.5 (min: 9.69, max: 72.94) fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
25.57 (min: 7.38, max: 46.96) fps ∼66% -34%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32.86 fps ∼85% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (38.4 - 38.6, n=3)
38.5 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 739, n=53)
28.6 fps ∼74% -26%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
333277 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
250577 Points ∼75% -25%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
270884 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
300617 Points ∼90% -10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
302955 Points ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
294488 Points ∼88% -12%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
285269 Points ∼86% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
246366 Points ∼74% -26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (328111 - 333277, n=3)
330277 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (63421 - 374820, n=254)
126932 Points ∼38% -62%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
273655 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
222290 Points ∼81% -19%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
229374 Points ∼84% -16%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
250848 Points ∼92% -8%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
228939 Points ∼84% -16%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
215632 Points ∼79% -21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
226124 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (269219 - 274007, n=3)
272294 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23275 - 274007, n=460)
83838 Points ∼31% -69%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4967 Score ∼99%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5025 Score ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4716 Score ∼94% -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
 
4967 Score ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 5025, n=55)
1945 Score ∼39% -61%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1383 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
1109 Points ∼64% -20%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1228 Points ∼71% -11%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1424 Points ∼82% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
1731 Points ∼100% +25%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1398 Points ∼81% +1%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
1176 Points ∼68% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1400 Points ∼81% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (1383 - 1439, n=3)
1402 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=585)
732 Points ∼42% -47%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8401 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6370 Points ∼41% -24%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6726 Points ∼43% -20%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6273 Points ∼40% -25%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
15659 Points ∼100% +86%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7969 Points ∼51% -5%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7989 Points ∼51% -5%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7743 Points ∼49% -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (7361 - 8484, n=3)
8082 Points ∼52% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=585)
1883 Points ∼12% -78%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4306 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2625 Points ∼42% -39%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2910 Points ∼46% -32%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6283 Points ∼100% +46%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
1815 Points ∼29% -58%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4344 Points ∼69% +1%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2825 Points ∼45% -34%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3704 Points ∼59% -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4306 - 4570, n=3)
4450 Points ∼71% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 6283, n=585)
1406 Points ∼22% -67%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8344 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6413 Points ∼55% -23%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6717 Points ∼58% -19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8604 Points ∼74% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11675 Points ∼100% +40%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8156 Points ∼70% -2%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
4417 Points ∼38% -47%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8418 Points ∼72% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (7476 - 8344, n=3)
7884 Points ∼68% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=585)
2790 Points ∼24% -67%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4520 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3302 Points ∼67% -27%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3565 Points ∼73% -21%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4687 Points ∼96% +4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4895 Points ∼100% +8%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4458 Points ∼91% -1%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3291 Points ∼67% -27%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4288 Points ∼88% -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (4320 - 4548, n=3)
4463 Points ∼91% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=589)
1383 Points ∼28% -69%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1928 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
1481 Points ∼62% -23%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1571 Points ∼65% -19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2407 Points ∼100% +25%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1201 Points ∼50% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
  (1927 - 1937, n=3)
1931 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=96)
710 Points ∼29% -63%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
273.01 Points ∼100% +197%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
109.18 Points ∼40% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
91.774 Points ∼34%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (84 - 91.8, n=2)
87.9 Points ∼32% -4%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
86.123 Points ∼32% -6%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
82.61 Points ∼30% -10%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
75.8 Points ∼28% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
71.172 Points ∼26% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
69.59 Points ∼25% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (17.6 - 273, n=491)
38.2 Points ∼14% -58%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
43114 Points ∼100% +107%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
23285 Points ∼54% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
20849 Points ∼48%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (18697 - 20849, n=3)
19944 Points ∼46% -4%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
16824 Points ∼39% -19%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
16228 Points ∼38% -22%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
15906 Points ∼37% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
14760 Points ∼34% -29%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
13360 Points ∼31% -36%
Average of class Smartphone (3126 - 43280, n=646)
6099 Points ∼14% -71%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=665)
10916 ms * ∼100% -488%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
3179 ms * ∼29% -71%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
2785 ms * ∼26% -50%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
2361 ms * ∼22% -27%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
2281.6 ms * ∼21% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2059.7 ms * ∼19% -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1857 - 2240, n=3)
2007 ms * ∼18% -8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
1951.9 ms * ∼18% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
1856.6 ms * ∼17%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
603.1 ms * ∼6% +68%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
155 Points ∼100% +35%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
124 Points ∼80% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
115 Points ∼74%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
115 Points ∼74% 0%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
100 Points ∼65% -13%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
94 Points ∼61% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
75 Points ∼48% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
64 Points ∼41% -44%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 161, n=118)
63.4 Points ∼41% -45%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
347 Points ∼100% +11%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
334 Points ∼96% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
314 Points ∼90%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (292 - 325, n=3)
310 Points ∼89% -1%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
287 Points ∼83% -9%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
267 Points ∼77% -15%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
260 Points ∼75% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
211 Points ∼61% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
164 Points ∼47% -48%
Average of class Smartphone (66 - 362, n=324)
119 Points ∼34% -62%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 71)
58.6 runs/min ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
56 runs/min ∼96%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (54 - 56, n=2)
55 runs/min ∼94% -2%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
46.4 runs/min ∼79% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=62)
33.3 runs/min ∼57% -41%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy S10 PlusSamsung Galaxy S9 PlusLG V40 ThinQHuawei Mate 20 ProOnePlus 6TGoogle Pixel 3 XLSony Xperia XZ2 PremiumAverage 512 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-0%
-2%
105%
-7%
111%
-24%
47%
-41%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
63.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
72.38 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
19%
30.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-50%
60.7
0%
48.3 (9.5 - 87.1, n=391)
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
84.88 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
16%
83.18 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
14%
34.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-53%
73
0%
66.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=391)
-9%
Random Write 4KB
22.7
22.74
0%
23.36
3%
157.84
595%
22
-3%
132.7
485%
21.75
-4%
87.4 (22.7 - 152, n=2)
285%
19.2 (0.14 - 250, n=695)
-15%
Random Read 4KB
135.16
129.68
-4%
130.13
-4%
157.42
16%
138.5
2%
120.8
-11%
135.99
1%
138 (135 - 142, n=2)
2%
43.8 (1.59 - 175, n=695)
-68%
Sequential Write 256KB
249.06
204.94
-18%
203.92
-18%
196.39
-21%
204.4
-18%
228.6
-8%
170.98
-31%
246 (243 - 249, n=2)
-1%
90.1 (2.99 - 392, n=695)
-64%
Sequential Read 256KB
811.17
818.69
1%
689.59
-15%
853.28
5%
735.3
-9%
632.6
-22%
748.59
-8%
768 (725 - 811, n=2)
-5%
254 (12.1 - 1468, n=695)
-69%
PUBG Mobile
01020304050Tooltip
; 0.11.0: Ø39.1 (14-42)
Asphalt 9
0102030Tooltip
; 1.4.1a: Ø29.1 (26-30)
Battle Bay
0102030405060Tooltip
; 4.3.22176: Ø59.6 (57-60)
Hög belastning
 35.8 °C36.9 °C36.3 °C 
 36.3 °C38 °C38.1 °C 
 37.2 °C39.3 °C37.1 °C 
Max: 39.3 °C
Medel: 37.2 °C
35.1 °C34.8 °C34.8 °C
34.7 °C35.6 °C35.2 °C
33.4 °C35.4 °C35.4 °C
Max: 35.6 °C
Medel: 34.9 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  33 °C | Rumstemperatur 20.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.832.62522.424.93122.724.94023.820.95030.930.96320.422.4802320.810021.123.412516.936.316017.853.320015.650.625014.855.631516.262.740014.364.550013.865.963013.769.880014.869.8100014.673.4125014.974.7160013.975.4200014.276.3250013.875.7315014.678.5400015.578.3500014.478.8630014.277.2800015.174.41000015.271.51250015.167.61600014.863.5SPL26.787.8N0.872.7median 14.8median 69.8Delta0.69.440.441.73634.540.928.533.230.441.14224.734.524.624.622.930.22038.717.545.718.849.818.951.11749.915.655.918.955.614.653.312.856.512.759.81264.31166.71168.91169.410.768.210.962.910.961.61162.711641161.911.158.111.152.862.324.877.215.60.637median 12median 58.135.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S10 PlusApple iPhone Xs Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone Xs Max audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.26 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.73 / 1.53 / 2.07 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 6.03 / 9.18 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
LG V40 ThinQ
3300 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Google Pixel 3 XL
3430 mAh
OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9820
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
32%
12%
-4%
8%
6%
14%
10%
7%
Idle Minimum *
0.73
0.68
7%
0.87
-19%
0.95
-30%
1
-37%
0.7
4%
0.7
4%
0.647 (0.6 - 0.73, n=3)
11%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=724)
-21%
Idle Average *
1.53
0.95
38%
1.39
9%
2.17
-42%
1.4
8%
1.4
8%
1.1
28%
1.333 (1.2 - 1.53, n=3)
13%
1.737 (0.6 - 6.2, n=723)
-14%
Idle Maximum *
2.07
1.09
47%
1.41
32%
2.25
-9%
1.7
18%
2
3%
2.1
-1%
1.623 (1.3 - 2.07, n=3)
22%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=724)
2%
Load Average *
6.03
4.58
24%
3.96
34%
4.47
26%
4.6
24%
4.8
20%
4.2
30%
5.8 (5.2 - 6.17, n=3)
4%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=718)
33%
Load Maximum *
9.18
5.16
44%
8.6
6%
6.15
33%
6.7
27%
9.5
-3%
8.3
10%
9.31 (8.55 - 10.2, n=3)
-1%
5.86 (1.2 - 14.2, n=718)
36%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
26tim 00min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
8tim 03min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15tim 21min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
3tim 07min
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
LG V40 ThinQ
3300 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh
Google Pixel 3 XL
3430 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
Battery Runtime
-2%
6%
29%
11%
35%
23%
-5%
Reader / Idle
1560
1343
-14%
1140
-27%
1747
12%
1305
-16%
1936
24%
1725
11%
1347
-14%
H.264
921
674
-27%
659
-28%
854
-7%
801
-13%
903
-2%
724
-21%
520
-44%
WiFi v1.3
483
521
8%
510
6%
767
59%
742
54%
865
79%
691
43%
547
13%
Load
187
237
27%
320
71%
282
51%
223
19%
261
40%
299
60%
235
26%

För

+ utmärkt design
+ lyxiga material
+ snabb SoC
+ massor av RAM och lagring
+ utökningsbar lagring
+ dual-SIM
+ bra kameror
+ skaplig OLED-skärm
+ vattenresistent och dammsäker
+ USB 3.1 Typ C med stöd för DP, HDMI och OTG
+ bra stereohögtalare
+ utmärkt fingeravtrycksläsare
+ trådlös laddning

Emot

- batteritiden är en besvikelse
- inget stöd för eSIM
- WiFi-batteritiden är en besvikelse
- osäker ansiktsigenkänning
- dess SoC stryps vid ihållande belastning
- PWM
- inget stöd för aptX HD
Recension av Samsung Galaxy S10+. Recensionsex från Samsung Germany.
Recension av Samsung Galaxy S10+. Recensionsex från Samsung Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Samsung Galaxy S10+ är definitivt en värdig efterföljare till sin föregångare och är en sann flaggskeppstelefon. Men den senaste modellen i Galaxy S-serien är inte lika prisvärd som sin föregångare, i huvudsak på grund av att konkurrenterna har kommit ifatt den senaste året. Det bästa exemplet på detta är skärmen och kamerorna. Skärmen är utmärkt, men den har inte lika bra ljusstyrka och färgprecision som skärmarna på våra jämförelseenheter. Och även om kameran tar fantastiska bilder och spelar in utmärkt video så finns det bättre alternativ när det kommer till fotografering i situationer med lite ljus. Samsung har helt enkelt blivit lite för självgoda med sin kamerateknik de senaste två åren.

Exynos 9820 är också ett riktigt kraftpaket, men den kommer troligen att hamna efter Snapdragon 855 när den sistnämnda släpps senare under året. LTE-modemet är också snabbt, men vi hade uppskattat stöd för fler frekvensband. Även om Galaxy S10-enheterna är de snabbaste telefonerna som stödjer WiFi 6 så slukade modemet i vår testenhet för mycket energi, vilket behöver åtgärdas.

Samsung Galaxy S10+ följer många moderna tekniktrender och bygger framgångsrikt in dem i ett välavrundad paket, men den lyckas inte riktigt vara telefonen alla andra kommer att försöka slå under 2019.

Vi tycker fortfarande det är anmärkningsvärt att den saknar stöd för aptX HD. Även om LDAX är ett ännu mer högupplöst kodek så är det vid skrivande stund få hörlurar som stödjer det, så det är synd att Samsung fortsätter att överge aptX HD. Samsung utrustar dock fortfarande sina flaggskeppstelefoner med hörlursanslutningar, vilket man inte kan säga om de flesta andra tillverkare.

Den ultraljudsbaserade fingeravtrycksläsaren fungerade också bra under våra tester, även med våta eller oljiga händer, vilket var imponerande. Slutligen så erbjuder den nya Galaxy S10-serien en extremt stor mängd minne som dessutom kan utökas med ett microSD-kort på upp till 512 GB. Du får dock vara beredd att betala en del pengar om du vill göra detta.

I slutändan så kommer Galaxy S10+ inte direkt med något nytt till denna redan överfyllda marknad. Vi misstänker att Samsung har sparat de riktigt innovativa funktionerna till Galaxy Fold. Även om detta inte bör förringa vad som redan är en utmärkt smartphone bör det stå som en varning innan du gräver djupt i fickorna för att skaffa Samsungs senaste flaggskeppstelefon.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, 2019-03-17 (Update: 2019-03-18)